Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Permit Number - D07-0040
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 09/13/2007 | FRODRIG2 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 09/14/2007 | JASON GREEN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: October 9, 2007 SUBJECT: Valencia Dental Center Development Plan- Engineering Review TO: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager LOCATION: 295 W Valencia Road, T15S R13E Sec13 Ward 1 REVIEWERS: Jason Green, CFM ACTIVITY: D07-0040 SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Development Services Department has received and reviewed the proposed Development Plan, Drainage Statement (Stantec Consulting Inc., 06SEP07), and Landscape Plan. Engineering Division does not recommend approval of the Development Plan at this time. The Drainage Statement was reviewed for Development Plan purposes only. The following items need to be addressed: DEVELOPMENT PLAN: Per LUC 3.3.3.12, LUC 3.4.3.7, and LUC 3.7.1.2.B provide the expansion calculation for both the building expansion and parking area expansion to prove that the expansion ratio is below twenty-five (25) percent. Depending on results of calculation additional comments may be generated. 1) DS Sec.2-05.2.1.D.1: Revise the project location map on Sheet 1 to show the subject property approximately centered within the 1-square mile shown. 2) DS Sec.2-05.2.1.D.2: Revise the project location map on Sheet 1 to identify conditions within the square mile area shown, specifically the Valencia Wash adjacent to the property. 3) DS Sec.2-05.2.1.K: The correct Development Plan number (D07-0040) may be added to the lower right hand corner of the plan on all sheets. 4) DS Sec.2-05.2.2.B.10: Revise the general note section on Sheet 2 to add a note that reads "This project is designed to meet the overlay zones criteria; Sec.2.8.3, Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Setback Zone; Sec 2.8.4, Gateway Corridor Zone; and Sec 2.8.5, Airport Environs Zone (AEZ). 5) DS Sec.2-05.2.2.C.1.b: Revise General Note #7 on the Development Plan to accurately read; "Drainage will remain in it's natural state and will not be altered, disturbed, or obstructed other than as shown on this development plan." The word development must be substituted for site. 6) DS Sec.2-05.2.2.C.2.a: Provide the following note on the Development Plan to read; "This project is affected by the City of Tucson Floodplain Regulations." 7) DS Sec.2-05.2.2.C.2.b: Provide the following note on the Development Plan to read; "A floodplain use permit is required for any work proposed within the limits of the mapped 100-year floodplain of the Valencia Wash as shown on the Development Plan." This is applicable to the Phase II development and construction/redesign of the vehicular use area as proposed. 8) DS Sec.2-05.2.2.D.2: Provide the following Street and Roads Note on the Development Plan; "No structure or vegetation shall be located or maintained so as to interfere with the sight visibility triangles in accordance with the Development Standard 3-01.0." 9) DS Sec.2-05.2.3.B: Verify that all easements are drawn with recordation information, location, width, and purpose of on the Development Plan. A Title Report was not submitted for this project, but maybe required to verify if any easements affect this property. 10) DS Sec.2-03.2.3.C: Revise the Development Plan to provide the recordation information for the shown right-of-ways of Valencia Road and San Fernando Road. Label as public or private. 11) DS Sec.2-03.2.3.C: Revise the Development Plan to provide the dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalk for Valencia Road and San Fernando Road. 12) DS Sec.2-03.2.3.D: Revise the Development Plan to show the following information regarding the existing utilities: for the existing sewer line provide the pipe diameter and the invert and rim elevations of all manholes and clean outs. 13) DS Sec.2-03.2.3.F: Revise the Development Plan to label and dimension the existing storm drainage facilities adjacent to the property. Include the existing street grate along San Fernando Road and the existing culvert under Valencia Road. 14) DS Sec.2-03.2.3.I.1: Provide the water surface elevation (WSEL) for the 100-year floodplain limits of the Valencia Wash that is shown on the existing and proposed Development Plan to verify that the finished floor elevation is elevated 1-foot above the WSEL. Label the 100-year floodplain limits in plan view. 15) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.D.2: Revise the Development plan to indicate if the existing streets are public or private; provide the roadway widths, curbs, sidewalks and utility locations fully dimensioned. 16) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.D.3: Revise the Development Plan to show wheel stop barrier for the parking spaces located along any adjacent pedestrian circulation paths or landscape area. The barriers are to be set at 15.5-feet to accommodate the required 2.5-foot overhang to prevent encroachment or damage to the required clear 4-foot pedestrian path and/or landscape areas. 17) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.D.3: Depict and label the 25-feet radii concrete curbs per City of Tucson/Pima County Standard Detail 213 (PC/COT SD 213) at all of the driveway entrances. The curb returns must be labeled and dimensioned on the Development Plan. 18) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.D.3: Verify that the Development Plan reflects handicap access ramps with truncated domes (see ANSI 705.5. for design criteria) at all existing and proposed handicap ramp location. Please refer to this standard and the figures provided for additional curb access ramps requirements. 19) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.D.3: Verify that all existing and proposed PAAL widths meet the minimum 24-foot width requirement. Dimension all PAALs. Specifically at the PAAL adjacent to the existing canopy and the existing PAAL along the south portion of the property. A minimum of 24-feet is required for 2-way traffic and 12-feet for one way unless the PAAL is used as a fire access lane. 20) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.D.4: Provide the cross-access easement agreement required for the proposed PAAL and vehicular use area south of the existing building. If private easements are utilized protective covenants establishing the right of access is required. 21) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.F: Revise the Development Plan to label and dimension the future MS&R curb and sidewalk area for Valencia Road. 22) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.G: Verify the location of all proposed utilities and provide any applicable easements for sewer, electric, water, gas, etc. 23) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.H.1: Provide a cross section with details for the proposed water harvesting areas (WHA) that except onsite flows from the vehicular use areas. The detail should clearly show curb openings to allow the water to drain from the vehicular use area into the WHA. In the northwest corner the detail should clearly show how the water gets from the WHA to the existing culvert. 24) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.H.2: Clearly show drainage arrows for all vehicular use areas and for the roof drainage to demonstrate onsite drainage patterns. 25) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.K: Provide a continuous pedestrian circulation path that connects all public access areas of the existing and proposed buildings and the sidewalk area located on San Fernando Road and Valencia Road. Per DS Sec.2-08 sidewalks are to be flood free for all storm discharges of up to a ten (10) year flood, provide a revised Drainage Report showing calculations, sizing and a detail for all sidewalk scuppers along the pedestrian circulation paths located adjacent to the buildings. 26) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.K: Revise the site plan to show the minimum distance of 5-feet for a pedestrian refuge that must be maintained between any enclosed structure and the proposed PAAL. The pedestrian circulation is required to be a minimum 4-foot wide and set back 1-foot from the PAAL and must be physically separated from the PAAL with curbing or 6" raised concrete sidewalk. Provide a 1-foot setback between the roof overhang of the canopy and the PAAL. Provide this circulation on the westside of the existing building adjacent to the canopy. 27) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.L: Provide the dimensions, percent slope, handicap access ramps (with truncated domes), for all sidewalks abutting the right-of-way for both roads. 28) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.O: Label and dimension the maneuverability for all required loading zones on the subject property. 29) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.P: Provide a detail for all proposed parking spaces. A typical parking space detail shall be provided for both standard parking spaces and those for the physically disabled. Refer to DS Sec.3-05 for design criteria for parking spaces and access. Specifically the parking spaces under the existing canopy. 30) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.R: Revise the Development Plan to provide for the Sight Visibility Triangles (SVTs) per DS Sec.3-01.5.0 for all PAAL entrances and roadway intersections. Revise the landscape plan to reflect the SVTs shown on the Development Plan. 31) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.T: Provide the detail dimensions for the existing refuse containers, the enclosures must have a minimum inside clear dimension of 10 feet by 10 feet between the steel bollards that are required between the container and the enclosure's rear and sidewall. The inside clear dimensions must be shown from the face of the wall protectors. Refer to DS Sec.6-01.4.2 for specifications and requirements on access, placement of containers, bin enclosure and construction. 32) DS Sec.11-01.2.1: Provide estimated cut and fill quantities on the Development Plan for grading plan purposes. 33) Review and approval from TDOT Permits and Codes for all improvements within the public right-of-way will be required. A right-of-way use permit application will be required prior to construction. Refer to the following links for TDOT Forms and applications: a) http://www.tucsonaz.gov/dsd/Forms_Fees___Maps/Applications/applications.html / b) http://www.dot.ci.tucson.az.us/engineering/pia.php c) Or contact Steve Tineo at 741-3115 for all additional questions regarding r-o-w. DRAINAGE REPORT: 34) DS Sec. 3-01.4.4.F: Provide a revised Drainage Report showing calculations that demonstrate that the 10-year flood flow is contained under the sidewalk at all scupper concentration points (including the pedestrian circulation paths adjacent to the building). Provide details and dimensions in plan view for the scuppers on the proposed Development Plan. GRADING PLAN: 35) DS Sec.11-01.2.1: A grading permit may be required for this project depending on the cut and fill quantities provided. A grading plan and a grading permit application will be required after Development Plan approval and prior to any construction activity. A grading permit may not be issued prior to Development Plan approval. 36) Please ensure that any future grading plan will be consistent with the Development Plan, Drainage Report, and geotechnical report. Grading standards may be accessed at: http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/DevStandsTOC.pdf 37) Arizona Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (AZPDES) requirements may be applicable to this project. Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans (SWPPP) and text addressing stormwater controls for all areas affected by construction activities related to this development might be required with a grading plan submittal. For further information, visit www.adeq.state.az.us/environ/water/permits/stormwater.html. GENERAL COMMENTS: Please provide a revised Development Plan and a revised Drainage Report that address the comments provided above. Include a comprehensive response letter addressing in detail responses to all of the above comments. Further comments may be generated upon resubmittal of the Development Plan and Drainage Report reviews. For any questions, or to schedule a meeting call me at 837-4929. Jason Green, CFM Senior Engineer Associate Engineering Division Development Services |
| 09/14/2007 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 09/19/2007 | ED ABRIGO | PIMA COUNTY | ASSESSOR | Approved | Office of the Pima County Assessor 115 N. Church Ave. Tucson, Arizona 85701 BILL STAPLES ASSESSOR TO: CDRC Office Subdivision Review City of Tucson (FAX# 791-5559) FROM: Gary Ault, Mapping Supervisor Pima County Assessor's Office Mapping Department DATE: September 19, 2007 RE: Assessor's Review and Comments Regarding DEVELOPMENT PLAN: D07-0040 VALENCIA DENTAL CENTER T151313 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * X Plat meets Assessor's Office requirements. _______ Plat does not meet Assessor's Office requirements. ROSANNA WERNER |
| 09/24/2007 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | ADOT has NO COMMENT on this project D07-0040 Stantec Consulting Inc. VALENCIA DENTAL CENTER -------------------------------------------------------- Confidentiality and Nondisclosure Notice: This email transmission and any attachments are intended for use by the person(s)/entity(ies) named above and may contain confidential/privileged information. Any unauthorized use, disclosure or distribution is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by email, and delete or destroy all copies plus attachments. |
| 09/24/2007 | TIM ROWE | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | September 20, 2007 To: Laura Lohner Stantec Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department ___________________________ From: Tom Porter, Sr. CEA (520-740-6579), representing the Pima County Departments of Wastewater Management and Environment Quality Subject: Valencia Dental Center Dev. Plan - 1st Submittal D07-040 The proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. This project will be tributary to the Roger Road Wastewater Treatment Facility via the Santa Cruz Interceptor. Per written guidance provided by the PCWMD Development Services Section, sufficient conveyance and treatment capacity exists in the downstream public sewerage system for this small project, and a formal capacity response letter from the PCWMD will not be required for this small project. All Sheets: Show the jurisdiction’s case number, D07-040, in or near the title block of each sheet. This case number should be shown larger and bolder than any associated cross-reference numbers. Sheet 1: Show the public and private sewer lines using different line-types, so that they can readily be distinguished from each other. Also, show and describe examples of these different line types in the legend on Sheet 1. Currently there is no symbol in the legend for proposed sewer. Sheet 1: All public sewer elements (manholes and sewer mains), that are located on this project or are less than 100’ from this project, are identified with the wastewater plan and IMS numbers. The IMS numbers are the sewer element identification numbers that can be found on the PCWMD Maps and Records (5th floor) basemaps or on PCWMD and PCDOT MapGuide internet websites. Sheet 1: Show the sewer directional flow arrows on both the proposed and existing sewer lines. Sheet 1: Show the existing and any proposed new BCS lines. Sheet1: Show the pipe size of the existing public sewer line. Sheet 2: Add the General Note : THIS PROJECT WILL HAVE ______ EXISTING AND______ PROPOSED WASTEWATER FIXTURE UNIT EQUIVALENTS PER TABLE 13.20.045(E)(1) IN PIMA COUNTY CODE 13.20.045(E). And fill in the blanks with the appropriate values. This office will require a revised set of bluelines, and a response letter, addressing these comments. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. Pima County Code Title 13.20.030.A.2 requires that a wastewater review fee be paid for each submittal of the development plan. The fee for the first submittal is $166 plus $50 per sheet. For the second submittal, the review fee is $50 per sheet. For all subsequent submittals, the review fee is $39 per sheet. The next submittal of this project will be the second (2nd) submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $100 (made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER) must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. If you have any questions regarding the above-mentioned comments, please contact me. |
| 10/01/2007 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | 4350 E. Irvington Road, Tucson, AZ 85714 Post Office Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702 WR#188337 September 27, 2007 Dear Mr. Delph : SUBJECT: Valencia Dental Center D07-0040 Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the development plan submitted September 24, 2007 It appears that there are no conflicts with the existing facilities within the boundaries of this proposed development. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. All relocation costs will be billable to the customer. In order to apply for electric service, call the New Construction Department at (520) 918-8300. Submit a final set of plans including approved site, offsite and electrical load plans. Include a CD with the AutoCAD version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Your final plans should be sent to: Tucson Electric Power Company Attn: Ms. Mary Boice New Business Project Manager P. O. Box 711 (DB-101) Tucson, AZ 85702 520-917-8732 Please call the area Designer Steve Garcia at (520) 917-8739, should you have any questions. Sincerely, Henrietta Noriega Office Specialist Design/Build hn Enclosures cc:S. Garcia |
| 10/02/2007 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Approved | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: D07-0040 VALENCIA DENTAL CENTER/DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE: 10/02/07 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and we hereby approve this project. NOTE: Submit a 24 x 36 Reverse Reading Double Matte Photo Mylar of approved Development Plan to City Planning. Signed and dated Mylar will be forwarded to Pima County Addressing prior to assignment of addresses. 2.) All addresses will need to be displayed per Pima County Address Standards at the time of final inspection. ES |
| 10/03/2007 | JOSE ORTIZ | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | |
| 10/03/2007 | KAROL ARAGONEZ | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Karol Aragonez Planner PROJECT: D07-0040 Valencia Dental Center Development Plan TRANSMITTAL DATE: September 27, 2007 DUE DATE: October 11, 2007 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is September 13, 2008. 2. Within the location map please show the subject property approximately centered within the one (1) square mile area. DS 2-05.2.1.D.1 3. Case number D07-0040 has been assigned to this development plan (DP). Please place this number in the right corner of all sheets of the development plan, landscape plan, NPPO, and any other associated sheets. DS 2-05.2.2.B.2 4. Please add note that reads " This project is designed to meet the overlay zones criteria; Sec.2.8.3, Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Setback Zone; Sec 2.8.4, Gateway Corridor Zone; and Sec 2.8.5, Airport Environs Zone (AEZ). DS 2-05.2.2.B.10 5. Please provide the expansion calculation for both the building expansion and parking area expansion to prove that the expansion ratio is below twenty-five (25) percent. Depending on results of calculation additional comments may be generated. LUC 3.3.3.12, LUC 3.4.3.7, and LUC 3.7.1.2.B 6. Please add to general note 4 "subject to LUC Sec. 3.5.4.8.B 7. Please draw all existing easements on the plan along with recordation information, location, width, and purpose. If an easement is no longer in use and scheduled to be vacated or has been abandoned, so indicate. If none exist provide response to reviewer's comments. Also if easements are purposed please draw, dimension and label as to their purpose and whether they will be public or private. If none exist provide response to reviewer's comments. DS 2-05.2.3.B & DS 2-05.2.4.G 8. Please provide the recordation data, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, and sidewalks within Valencia Road and San Fernando Road. DS 2-05.2.3.C 9. Parking spaces created under the existing drive-through canopy must be fully dimensioned, provide wheel stop curbing, and show a twenty-four (24) foot PAAL area to allow maneuvering as required by DS 3-05.0. · If vertical barriers exist that are higher than six (6) inches the width of the spaces must be increased to ten (10) feet (DS 3-05.2.1.B.3). · The PAAL to the west of the covered parking must be a minimum of twelve (12) feet in width if utilized as one-way and must be indicated on the plan, unless used as a fire lane in which case it must be a minimum of twenty (20) feet wide (DS 3-05.2.1.C.1). · There must also be a one (1) foot setback maintained between the roof overhang of the canopy and the PAAL (DS 3-05.2.2.B.2). · A four (4) foot wide sidewalk that is physically separate must be provided along the west side of the building between the PAAL and building and the parking spaces and the building (DS 2-08.4.1.B & C) 10. Parking calculations provided do not add up. Additional parking spaces required for total building is four (4) of which two (2) shall be accessible for a total of four (4). Proposed Phase I should be thirty-four (34) required of which two (2) are accessible for a total of thirty-four (34), not thirty-six (36). Proposed Phase II a total of fifty-nine (59) required of which four (4) are accessible for a total fifty-nine (59) provided. Please verify and correct. 11. Previous approved development plan provided a pedestrian connection from Valencia Road to the building. This required connection has been removed on the proposed development plan. Please provide this required connection as required by DS 2-08.4.1.A. 12. Truncated domes provided at the access aisles are not provided in the direction of travel onto the access aisle. Please relocate the domes. Revise detail 1/2 and B/2 on sheet 2/2. ANSI 705 13. The access ramp for the accessible parking southeast of the new addition is placed in front of a tree, blocking access. Please revise. 14. Please correct the proposed accessible sign height from five (5) feet to seven (7) feet as required by TDOT. 15. Please provide a four (4) foot wide sidewalk between the accessible parking southeast of the new addition and proposed addition. DS 2-08.4.1.C 16. Please add wheel-stop curbing for parking spaces abutting ten (10) foot landscape border and for the 5th and 6th parking space north of the new addition to prevent vehicles from overhanging sidewalk area and to prevent damage to plants. DS 3-05.2.3.C.1 17. Please provide a copy of cross access agreement between this site and that property owned by the church to the south. 18. Please clarify the use of the striped area to the east of the new addition. It is unclear what this area is intended for. 19. Within the new addition footprint please add the proposed height and provide the dimensions of the addition. DS 2-05.2.4.N 20. Previously approved development plans show a required off-street loading space south of the building where currently four (4) motor vehicle parking spaces are located. Per LUC Sec. 3.4.5.3 GFA between 1,500 sq. ft. and 10,000 sq. ft. of GFA requires one (1) twelve (12) by thirty-five (35) foot space. Please provide the location of this required space and add required off-street loading calculations. DS 2-05.2.4.O & LUC 3.4.5.3 21. Bicycle parking is based on the number of provided motor vehicle parking spaces (LUC 3.3.3.5). Each phase is to provide bicycle parking. Phase I requires three (3) spaces and can be all Class 2 (under 50 spaces). Phase II will require a total of five spaces of which fifty (50) percent must be Class 1 and fifty (50) percent must be Class 2. Three (3) Class 1 spaces would be provided at Phase II, which would then bring the total bicycle count to three (3) Class I and three (3) Class 2 (from Phase I). 22. Please provide location and detail of Class 1 bicycle parking spaces as provided in DS 2-09.2.2. 23. All new Class 2 bicycle parking spaces must be located no more than fifty (50) feet from the main building entrance(s) and will be along the front side of the building as well as along other sides of the building that has an entrance. Please make sure this is demonstrated on the plan. 24. Please revise detail 11/2. The Class 2 bicycle rack must be placed a minimum of thirty-six (36) inches from the edge of the rack to an adjacent wall. Please see DS 2-09.8.0 Figure 9. 25. This site is within the AEZ Airport Hazard District (AHD) of the Tucson International Airport (TIA). The height of the proposed addition measured from the M.S.L. elevation at the end of the runway must be provided and cannot exceed the height as shown on the AEZ maps. Airport hazards as defined in LUC Sec. 6.2.1 are prohibited within the boundaries of the AHD. Please provide. 26. All changes, modifications, and/or corrections must be made on all applicable plans including the development plan, landscape plan, and NPPO. Once changes, modifications, and/or corrections are made and reviewed further comments may result. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Karol Aragonez, (520) 837-4960. KAA S:\zoning review\karol\planning\cdrc\developmentplan\D07-0040dp.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development plan and additional requested documents. |
| 10/04/2007 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Add the CDRC Development Plan case number (D07-040) to the lower right hand corner of all sheets of the Development Plan and Landscape Plan. DS 2-05.2.2.B.2 2. On sites where the gross floor area of the existing building(s) is ten thousand (10,000) square feet or less, expansions in square footage of land area, floor area, lot coverage, or vehicular use area as follows: If the expansion is less than 50%, the requirements of this Division apply only to the proposed expansion. Existing development on the site is subject to the zoning regulations in effect at the time the existing development received zoning approval per LUC 3.7.1.2.B If the expansion is 50% or greater, or if expansions as of February 15, 1991 cumulatively result in a 50% or greater expansion in land area, floor area, lot coverage, or vehicular use area, the requirements of this Division apply to the entire site per LUC 3.7.1.2.B. Provide a calculation of percent expansion of building floor area and vehicle use area on the development plan and submit a copy of the last approved landscape plan for the project site. Further comments may be necessary once copies of the approved landscape plan is provided and an expansion calculation is given. |
| 10/09/2007 | FRODRIG2 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Approved | CASE: D07-0040, VALENCIA DENTAL CENTER, DEVEL PLAN COMMENT: NO OBJECTIONS OR ADVERSE COMMENTS Vehicle Trip Generation: Daily: 245 PM Peak: 25 Please call if you have questions Tom Cooney, Travel Forecasting Manager Pima Association of Governments 177 N. Church Ave, #405 Tucson, AZ 85701 Tel: (520) 792-1093, Fax: (520) 620-6981 Web: www.PAGnet.org and www.RTAmobility.com |
| 10/11/2007 | FRODRIG2 | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Approved | >>> Jim Stoyanoff 10/10/2007 10:45 AM >>> No comment |
| 10/12/2007 | ANDY VERA | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 10/12/2007 | PGEHLEN1 | TUCSON WATER NEW AREA DEVELOPMENT | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 10/15/2007 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | DATE: October 12, 2007 TO: DSD_CDRC@ tucsonaz.gov FROM: Glenn Hicks Parks and Recreation 791-4873 ext. 215 Glenn.Hicks@tucsonaz.gov SUBJECT: D07-0040 Valencia Dental Center: Development Plan(9-14-07) Staff has no comments. |
| 10/18/2007 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES October 18, 2007 Laura Lohner Stantec Consulting Inc. 201 North Bonita Avenue, Suite 101 Tucson, Arizona 85745 Subject: D07-0040 Valencia Dental Center Development Plan Dear Laura: Your submittal of September 14, 2007 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 6 Copies Revised Development Plan (Engineering, Wastewater, Zoning, Landscape, DUPD, DSD) 5 Copies Revised Landscape Plan (Engineering, Zoning, Landscape, DUPD, DSD) 2 Copies Revised Drainage Report (Engineering, DSD) 2 Copies Cross Access Agreement (Zoning, DSD) 2 Copies Last Approved Landscape Plan (Landscape, DSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4919. Sincerely, Patricia Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 750-7470 |
| 10/18/2007 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Denied | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN COMMENTS Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT D07-0040 Valencia Dental Center 09/25/07 () Tentative Plat (XXXX) Development Plan (XXXX) Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other CROSS REFERENCE: C9-80-17 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: 12th Avenue/Valencia GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: COMMENTS DUE BY: 10/11/07 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment () Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies with Plan Policies () See Additional Comments Attached () No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: (XXXX) Resubmittal Required: () Tentative Plat (XXXX) Development Plan () Landscape Plan () Other REVIEWER: drcorral 791-4505 DATE: 9/19/07 1. Please add rezoning conditions to the general notes section of the development plan. |