Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Permit Number - D07-0036
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08/16/2007 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 08/23/2007 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | >>> "Douglas Kratina" <DKratina@azdot.gov> 08/23/2007 7:11 AM >>> ADOT has NO COMMENT on this Project D07-0036 PRESIDIO TERRACE |
| 08/28/2007 | TIM ROWE | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | August 27, 2007 To: Dowl Engineers Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department ___________________________ From: Tom Porter, Sr. CEA (520-740-6579), representing the Pima County Departments of Wastewater Management and Environment Quality Subject: Presidio Terrace, Lot 7 Dev. Plan - 1st Submittal D07-036 The proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. This project will be tributary to the Roger Road Wastewater Treatment Facility via the Santa Cruz Interceptor Obtain a letter from the PCWMD's Development Services Section, written within the past 90 days, stating that treatment and conveyance system capacity for the project is available in the downstream public sewerage system and provide a copy of that letter to this office. The required form to request such a letter may be found at: http://www.pima.gov/wwm/forms/docs/CapResponseRequest.pdf. The development plan for this project cannot be approved until a copy of this letter has been received by this office. All Sheets: Show the jurisdiction’s case number, D07-0036, in or near the title block of each sheet. This case number should be shown larger and bolder than any associated cross-reference numbers. Sheet DP.1: Revise General Note #13 to read as follows: THE ON-SITE SANITARY SEWERS WILL BE PRIVATE AND WILL BE CONSTRUCTED, OPERATED AND MAINTAINED ON A PRIVATE BASIS, AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH AN APPROVED OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE PLAN, IF REQUIRED. THE LOCATION AND METHOD OF CONNECTION TO AN EXISTING PUBLIC SANITARY SEWER IS SUBJECT TO REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT. Sheet DP.5: There is no legend for the sewer lines and cleanouts. Sheet DP.5: Show where the sewer line goes after MH#6352-01 and #9852-04. The line does not end abruptly at these manholes. Sheet DP.5: Show the plan# and size of pipe for all existing sewer lines shown on plan. Also mark the plan# for the private line running in Main Ave.. The private line should be shown w/ a different line type then the public lines and show this in the legend. Sheet DP.5: It is unclear if the sewer lines shown on this project are existing or proposed, this must be described in the legend. Sheet DP.5: If you are proposing to install 16” BCS please explain. The BCS should be shown as private from the point of connection to the public sewer. Sheet DP.5: With the size of sewer lines proposed on property(6” or more) manholes instead of cleanouts should be installed at all bends, intersections and ends of the line. Sheet DP.5: Each sewer line segment between manholes should be called out w/pipe size/length/material and slope. Sheet DP.5: The pipe line should not be shown running under the proposed buildings. Sheet DP.5: On the east side of project are you proposing to install a private manhole on the private sewer line running in Main Ave? If so a joint sewer use agreement will have to be obtained from the owner of the private sewer line. Sheet DP.5: Show the sewer directional flow arrows for both the public and proposed private sewer lines. Sheet DP.5: All proposed manholes and cleanouts must show rim and invert elevations. Sheet DP.5: The proposed sewer on property should be marked as private BCS. Sheet DP.5: The private BCS on east portion of lot goes from 6” to 4” w/o a cleanout. Need to show cleanout at transition and the line should not be shown under the buildings. This office will require a revised set of bluelines, and a response letter, addressing these comments. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. Pima County Code Title 13.20.030.A.2 requires that a wastewater review fee be paid for each submittal of the development plan. The fee for the first submittal is $166 plus $50 per sheet. For the second submittal, the review fee is $50 per sheet. For all subsequent submittals, the review fee is $39 per sheet. The next submittal of this project will be the second (2nd) submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $100.00 (made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER) must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. If you have any questions regarding the above-mentioned comments, please contact me. |
| 08/29/2007 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Denied | The opening between the garages must have a fire separation. It needs to meet the requirements of the property line or a type of contruction separation, whichever is greater. The construction type was given as I for the new garage. None was given for the existing. |
| 08/31/2007 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | 4350 E. Irvington Road, Tucson, AZ 85714 Post Office Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702 WR#186546 August 31, 2006 Presidio Terrace, LLC Attn: Peggy Nooman 515 East 24th Street Tucson, Arizona 85713 Dear Ms. Nooman : SUBJECT: Presidio Terrace D07-0036 Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the development plan submitted August 16, 2007. It appears that there are no conflicts with the existing facilities within the boundaries of this proposed development Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. Any relocation costs will be billable to the customer. In order to apply for electric service, call the New Construction Department at (520) 918-8300. Submit a final set of plans including approved site, electrical load, paving off-site improvements and irrigation plans, if available include a CD with the AutoCAD version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Your final plans should be sent to: Tucson Electric Power Company Attn: Ms. Mary Boice New Business Project Manager P. O. Box 711 (DB-101) Tucson, AZ 85702 520-917-8732 Should you have any technical questions, please call the area Designer Mike Kaiser at (520) 918-8244. Sincerely, Elizabeth Miranda Office Support Specialist Design/Build lm Enclosures cc: DSD_CDRC@tucsonaz.gov, City of Tucson (email) M. Kaiser, Tucson Electric Power |
| 09/10/2007 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: D07-0036 PRESIDIO TERRACE / DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE: September 7, 2007 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: 1.) Please define the nature of THIS project. Will the structures be Townhomes or Apartments? Townhomes usually get platted as lots. 2.) Delete direction from all street names. 3.) Please schedule a meeting to discuss this project prior to further review. jg |
| 09/13/2007 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Indicate the types of plants proposed in planting schedule for plants labeled T-4 and S-1. 2. Grading, hydrology, and landscape structural plans are to be integrated to make maximum use of site storm water runoff for supplemental on-site irrigation purposes. The landscape plan shall indicate use of all runoff, from individual catch basins around single trees to basins accepting flow from an entire vehicular use area or roof area. LUC 3.7.4.3.B 3. Landscape improvements proposed in public right-of-way areas must be approved by the City Engineer or designee and comply with the City Engineer's requirements on construction, irrigation, location, and plant type. Provide verification, in writing, of any approvals obtained. Contact Gary Wittwer, DOT Landscape Architect at (520) 791-5100 for specific requirements. 4. Add the CDRC development plan case number (D07-036) to all sheets of the development plan and landscape plan. 5. The subject site is within the La Entrada PAD District 2 and is subject to the requirements of the La Entrada PAD document. 6. This project site lies within the RIO NUEVO AND DOWNTOWN (RND) ZONE and is subject to the requirements of LUC 2.8.10 and DS 9-05. 7. Demonstrate compliance with DS 9-05.4.3.B.1 by providing shade calculations which state the percent shading along pedestrian pathways. 8. Submit Application for Exception; for NPPO approval per DS 2-15.2.0.C |
| 09/13/2007 | CDRC1 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Approved | >>> "Tom Cooney" <tCooney@pagnet.org> 09/13/2007 11:09 AM >>> CASE: D07-0036, PRESIDIO TERRACE, DEVEL PLAN COMMENT: NO OBJECTIONS OR ADVERSE COMMENTS Vehicle Trip Generation: Daily: 1,114 PM Peak: 102 Please call if you have questions Tom Cooney, Travel Forecasting Manager Pima Association of Governments 177 N. Church Ave, #405 Tucson, AZ 85701 Tel: (520) 792-1093, Fax: (520) 620-6981 Web: www.PAGnet.org and www.RTAmobility.com |
| 09/13/2007 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Denied | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN COMMENTS Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT D07-0036 Presidio Terrace 09/12/07 ( ) Tentative Plat ( X ) Development Plan ( X ) Landscape Plan ( ) Revised Plan/Plat ( ) Board of Adjustment ( ) Other CROSS REFERENCE: C9-06-08 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: PAD-2 GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: COMMENTS DUE BY: September 14, 2007 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: ( ) No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment ( ) Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions ( ) RCP Proposal Complies with Plan Policies ( X ) See Additional Comments Attached ( ) No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: ( X ) Resubmittal Required: ( ) Tentative Plat ( X ) Development Plan ( ) Landscape Plan ( ) Other REVIEWER: JBeall 791-4505 DATE: 9/6/07 Comments 1) Provide dimensions on the Site Plan that indicates the proposed building pad for Presidio Terrace conforms to the amended Exhibit F. 2) Defer to Transportation for review and comments regarding vehicle access for site subject to the required Traffic Impact Study. |
| 09/14/2007 | CDRC1 | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Denied | >>> Jim Stoyanoff 09/14/2007 11:51 AM >>> Real Estate suggested that this development be converted to a subdivision plat. Please clarify how the steps/stairs in the cafe/restaurant will work with regards to the existing steps/stairs at the south/east corner of the Tucson Water parcel (shown on DP.5 & DP.6). This is not a real estate issue but it appears from the drawings that there may be some safety concerns. Please consult with Tucson Water on this common area/ stairs. |
| 09/17/2007 | PGEHLEN1 | TUCSON WATER NEW AREA DEVELOPMENT | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 09/17/2007 | JOSE ORTIZ | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Denied | September 17, 2007 ACTIVITY NUMBER: D07-0036 PROJECT NAME: Presidio Terrace PROJECT ADDRESS: 301 W Paseo Redondo PROJECT REVIEWER: Jose E. Ortiz PE, Traffic Engineer Resubmittal Required: Traffic Engineering does not recommend approval of the Development Plan; therefore a revised Development Plan is required for re-submittal. The following items must be revised or added to the development plan. 1. Include a response letter with the next submittal that states how all comments have been addressed. 2. Show and label the sight visibility triangle (DS 2-05.2.4.R). 3. Solid waste vehicles shall service the refuse area with minimal impacts to Granada Avenue. Provide an exhibit that illustrates solid waste vehicular movements when collecting solid waste to ensure minimal conflicts with northbound motorists along Granada Avenue. 4. Provide civil plan sheets that illustrate ROW width, and dimension width of paving, curbs, curb cuts and sidewalks. (DS 2-05.2.2.D) 5. The access point off of Granada shall have 25' radius curb returns. (DS 3-01.0 figure 6) 6. Provide the Traffic Impact Analysis that was prepared by CLA 7. A private improvement agreement (PIA) will be necessary for the proposed work to be performed within the Right-of-way. An approved tentative plat is required prior to applying for a PIA. Contact the PIA Coordinator for additional PIA information at 791-5550 ext. 1107. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-4259 x76730 or Jose.Ortiz@tucsonaz.gov |
| 09/17/2007 | ED ABRIGO | PIMA COUNTY | ASSESSOR | Passed | |
| 09/18/2007 | TERRY STEVENS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Terry Stevens Lead Planner PROJECT: D07-0036 Presidio Terrace Development Plan TRANSMITTAL: 09/18/07 DUE DATE: 09/14/07 COMMENTS: 1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is 09/13/08. 2. This plan as submitted does not meet DS 2-05 for format and content. Please review Development Standards 2-05, 2-08, 2-09, 3-01, 3-05, ANSI 117.1-2003 and the LUC for criteria required on a Development Plan and resubmit. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Terry Stevens, (520) 837-4961 TLS C:\planning\cdrc\developmentplan\D07-0036dp.doc |
| 09/19/2007 | ANDY VERA | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Denied | 1. DP.6 A. Clarify shared trash and recycling. B. Is the existing trash enclosure area going to support all new development included in the DP? C. Provide the dimensions for the existing and/or new enclosure site. D. Clarify intended service type, quantity, size, and frequency anticipated. E. What does 8 cu. ft and 20 cu. ft. suppose to indicate as shown? Recommend this site include provisions to accomodate for a centralized compactor (DS 6-01.4.3) for refuse and front-load dumpsters or roll-off for recycle. DS 6-01.3.0 & 6-01.4.0. Please clarify and correct on resubmittal. |
| 09/26/2007 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | DATE: September 25, 2007 TO: DSD_CDRC@ tucsonaz.gov FROM: Glenn Hicks Parks and Recreation 791-4873 ext. 215 Glenn.Hicks@tucsonaz.gov SUBJECT: D07-0036 Presidio Terrace: Development Plan 8-16-07 Staff has no comments. |
| 09/28/2007 | JASON GREEN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: September 28, 2007 SUBJECT: Presidio Terrace Development Plan- Engineering Review TO: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager LOCATION: 301 W Paseo Redondo, T14S R13E Sec12 Ward 1 REVIEWERS: Jason Green, CFM ACTIVITY: D07-0036 SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Development Services Department has received the proposed development plan (Sheets 1 through 8), Drainage Report (DOWL Engineers, 20JUL07) and landscape plan. Engineering Division has reviewed the submitted development plan and does not recommend approval of the development plan at this time. The following items need to be addressed: DRAINAGE REPORT: 1) Verify within the drainage report that the 10-year stormwater discharge is contained under all pedestrian circulation paths located adjacent to the proposed building and at the required sidewalk location located at concentration point B1. 2) Provide a discussion within the drainage report for maximizing the water harvesting areas that will contain runoff from the vehicular use area and the onsite drainage. Consult the Water Harvesting Guidance Manual (Adopted October 18, 2005) for design guidelines. The manual is available online at http://dot.tucsonaz.gov/stormwater/downloads/2006WaterHarvesting.pdf. DEVELOPMENT PLAN: 3) The development plan as submitted does not meet the requirements within the Development Standards (DS) or Land Use Code for format and content. Please review DS Sec.2-05, 2-08, 3-01, 3-05, 6-01, 9-05, ANSI 117.1-2003 and the LUC for criteria required on a Development Plan for projects within the downtown Rio Nuevo District and resubmit for Engineering review. 4) Provide water-harvesting areas that will contain runoff from the vehicular use area and the onsite drainage. Consult the Water Harvesting Guidance Manual (Adopted October 18, 2005) for design guidelines. The manual is available online at http://dot.tucsonaz.gov/stormwater/downloads/2006WaterHarvesting.pdf. 5) DS Sec.6-01: Solid waste vehicles shall service the refuse area with minimal impacts to Granada Avenue. Provide an exhibit that illustrates solid waste vehicular movements when collecting solid waste to ensure minimal conflicts with northbound motorists along Granada Avenue. 6) DS Sec.6-01.3.0 & 6-01.4.0: Per Environmental Services Division it is recommend that this site include provisions to accommodate for a centralized compactor (DS 6-01.4.3) for refuse and front-load dumpsters or roll-off for recycle. 7) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.R: Revise the development plan to label and dimension the sight visibility triangle for the garage entrance at Granada Avenue. 8) DS Sec.2-05.2.2.D: Provide civil plan sheets that label and dimension the widths of the existing and future right-of-way, paving, curbs, curb cuts and the required sidewalks for all streets that front the proposed project. 6-foot sidewalks are required along the frontage of all MS&R roadways, 5-foot sidewalks are required along all other public roadways. 9) DS Sec.3-01.0 (figure 6): Provide and label the 25-feet radii concrete curbs per City of Tucson/Pima County Standard Detail 213 (PC/COT SD 213) at the entrance located on Granada Avenue. Refer to DS Sec.3-01.3.2.C and the Transportation Access Management Guidelines for street development standards. Per conversation with Tucson Department of Transportation (Jose Ortiz, P.E.) the 25-foot curb returns are required along the MS&R Street. GENERAL COMMENTS: Provide a revised development plan, drainage report, and landscape plan that addresses the comments provided above. Include a comprehensive response letter addressing in detail responses to all of the above comments. Further comments may be generated upon resubmittal of the development plan, drainage report, and landscape plan reviews. For any questions or to schedule a meeting, call me at 520-837-4929. Jason Green, CFM Senior Engineer Associate Engineering Division Development Services |
| 10/01/2007 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES October 1, 2007 Peggy Noonan Presidio Terrace LLC 515 East 24th Street Tucson, Arizona 85713 Subject: D07-0036 Presidio Terrace Development Plan Dear Peggy: Your submittal of August 16, 2007 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 11 Copies Revised Development Plan (Wastewater, Fire, Addressing, DUPD, Landscape, Real Estate, Traffic, Zoning, ESD, Engineering, DSD) 5 Copies Revised Landscape Plan (DUPD, Landscape, Zoning, Engineering, DSD) 2 Copies Revised NPPO Plan (Landscape, DSD) 2 Copies Revised Drainage Report (Engineering, DSD) 2 Copies Traffic Impact Analysis (Traffic, DSD) Since Tucson Water is not a CDRC review agency, a written response from the agency will be required to deal with comments from City of Tucson Real Estate. Should this plan be changed to a tentative plat, please let the CDRC office prior to resubmittal, as additional review agencies will have to be added to the next review. Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4919. Sincerely, Patricia Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 623-1482 |
| 10/01/2007 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | March 9, 2009 Peggy Noonan Presidio Terrace LLC 515 East 24th Street Tucson, AZ 85713 SUBJECT: CLOSURE OF CDRC FILE Development Plan Per Section 5.3.8.2.A, Expiration Dates, of the Land Use Code, "an applicant has one (1) year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A development plan application that has been in review for a period of one (1) year which has not been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a development plan for the property, a new development plan which complies with regulations in effect at that time must be submitted. The new submittal initiates a new one (1) year review period." Case # Case Name DSD Transmittal Date D07-0036 Dominos Mission/Drexel August 16, 2007 Please note that this case has been closed and that, in order to continue review of the project, new development plan/tentative plat application is required which comply with regulations in effect at the time of the new submittals. CDRC members should be advised of their ability to review the new applications per the current regulations. Thank you for your assistance. Sincerely, Patricia Y. Gehlen CDRC Manager xc: CDRC file D07-0036 ……. |