Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Number: D07-0035
Parcel: 11105063G

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - DEV PLAN

Permit Number - D07-0035
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - DEV PLAN
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
10/11/2007 FERNE RODRIGUEZ START PLANS SUBMITTED Completed
10/12/2007 FRODRIG2 PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER Approv-Cond October 12, 2007

To: Paul Dominguez
Arch West

Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager
City of Tucson Development Services Department

___________________________
From: Tom Porter, Sr. CEA (520-740-6579), representing the Pima County
Departments of Wastewater Management and Environment Quality

Subject: Mintec, Inc.
Dev. Plan – 2nd Submittal
D07-035


The proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use.

1. Sheet 1: Remove General Note #9.

Subject to the above, the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality and Wastewater Management Department hereby approve the above referenced submittal of the development plan. The required revision(s) may be shown on the Mylars.

Please note the following: Approval of the above referenced submittal does not authorize the construction of public or private sewer collection lines, or water distribution lines. Prior to the construction of such features, a Construction Authorization (Approval To Construct) may need to be obtained from the Pima County Environmental Quality.

Also, air quality activity permits must be secured by the developer or prime contractor from the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality before constructing, operating or engaging in an activity which may cause or contribute to air pollution.

If you have any questions regarding the above-mentioned comments, please contact me.
10/12/2007 JIM EGAN COT NON-DSD FIRE Approved
10/17/2007 KAY MARKS PIMA COUNTY ADDRESSING Approv-Cond 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL
TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207

KAY MARKS
ADDRESSING OFFICIAL
PH: 740-6480
FAX #: 740-6370


TO: CITY PLANNING
FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL
SUBJECT: D07-0035 MINTEC INC/REVISED DEVELOPMENT PLAN
DATE: October 15, 2007



The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and we hereby approve this project.

APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITION:
1. CORRECT FT. LOWELL ROAD TO FORT LOWELL ROAD ON MYLAR.

NOTE:

Submit a 24 x 36 Reverse Reading Double Matte Photo Mylar of approved Development Plan to City Planning. Signed and dated Mylar will be forwarded to Pima County Addressing prior to assignment of addresses.

All addresses will need to be displayed per Pima County Address Standards at the time of final inspection.


jg
10/17/2007 KAY MARKS PIMA COUNTY ADDRESSING Approv-Cond .
10/23/2007 KAROL ARAGONEZ ZONING REVIEW Denied CDRC TRANSMITTAL

TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office

FROM: Karol Aragonez
Planner

PROJECT: D07-0035
Mintec Inc
Development Plan

TRANSMITTAL DATE: October 23, 2007

DUE DATE: November 8, 2007

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed.

1. Please add dimensions of electric easements to keynotes 62 and 63.
DS 2-05.2.3.B

2. Please add width of existing curbing to keynote 4.
DS 2-05.2.3.C

3. Five (5) accessible spaces are required when the number of provided parking spaces are between 101-150. Of those five (5) spaces one (1) must be van accessible. Please revise parking calculations to reflect this.
2006 IBC Table 1106.1 and Sec. 1106.5

4. Please revise details 2/4 and 1/4. The area covered by the truncated domes shall be twenty-four (24) inch deep and extend the full width of the access aisle, preceding the access aisle in the direction of pedestrian travel. This would require expanding the landing to eight (8) feet in width.

5. The new loading space must meet the performance criteria of LUC 3.5.5.1.E which requires all work and activity in connection with, and secondary to, a manufacturing use, such as loading and unloading areas, docks, and platforms, shall be located entirely within a building or an area on the lot which is enclosed on all sides by a solid wall or fence six (6) feet in height. Such loading and unloading areas, docks, and platforms shall be located as far from any surrounding residential uses or zones as is reasonably possible. Please indicate how this is being met.
LUC 3.5.5.1.E

6. Please add to FAR calculation the provided percentage (0.22).

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Karol Aragonez, (520) 837-4960.

KAA S:\zoning review\karol\planning\cdrc\developmentplan\D07-0035dp.doc

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development plan.
10/25/2007 ROGER HOWLETT COT NON-DSD COMMUNITY PLANNING Approved DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN COMMENTS

Regarding

SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application

CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT

D07-0035 Mintec. Inc. 10/25/07

() Tentative Plat
(XXXX) Development Plan
(XXXX) Landscape Plan
() Revised Plan/Plat
() Board of Adjustment
() Other

CROSS REFERENCE: C9-77-32

NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Grant-Alvernon

GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE:

COMMENTS DUE BY: 10/24/07

SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:

() No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment
() Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions
() RCP Proposal Complies with Plan Policies
() See Additional Comments Attached
(XXXX) No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: 09/10/07
() Resubmittal Required:
() Tentative Plat
() Development Plan
() Landscape Plan
() Other

REVIEWER: drcorral 791-4505 DATE: 10/24/07
10/25/2007 JOE LINVILLE LANDSCAPE REVIEW Approved
11/05/2007 PATRICIA GILBERT ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied TO: Patricia Gehlen; CDRC Coordinator DATE: November 5, 2007

SUBJECT: Engineering review of the Development Plan. The activity number is D07-0035.

SUMMARY: The Development Plan and Drainage Report were received by Engineering on October 11th, 2007. Engineering has reviewed the received items and does not recommend approval of the Development Plan or the Drainage Report.

RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: DEVELOPMENT PLAN

APPROVED: DRAINAGE STATEMENT

The next submittal must address the following items:

DEVELOPMENT PLAN

1. Six foot sidewalks are required in the ROW per the Major Streets and Route Plan. Revise keynote 71 to show 6' sidewalks. DS 2-05.2.4.F.

2. Be advised a grading permit is required. A separate grading plan review and approval is required.
11/14/2007 ANDY VERA ENV SVCS REVIEW Approved DP improvement calculations identify less than 25% overall improvements therefore not requiring onsite refuse/recycle storage and collection to be brought to current development standards.
11/14/2007 PATRICIA GEHLEN ZONING-DECISION LETTER REVIEW Approv-Cond COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES

November 14, 2007

Paul Dominguez
Archwest P.C.
1051 North Columbus Blvd. #103
Tucson, Arizona 85711

Subject: D07-0035 Mintec, Inc. Development Plan

Dear Paul:

Your submittal of October 11, 2007 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed:

ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED

3 Copies Revised Development Plan (Engineering, Zoning, DSD)

3 Copies Revised Landscape Plan (Engineering, Zoning, DSD)







Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4919.

Sincerely,


Patricia Gehlen
CDRC Manager

All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/

Via fax: 622-9655
11/14/2007 PATRICIA GEHLEN ZONING-DECISION LETTER REVIEW Approv-Cond COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
***REVISED***


December 13, 2007

Paul Dominguez
Archwest P.C.
1051 North Columbus Blvd. #103
Tucson, Arizona 85711

Subject: D07-0035 Mintec, Inc. Development Plan

Dear Paul:

The above referenced development plan has been CONDITIONALLY APPROVED by the Community Design Review Committee. Once the necessary corrections are made per the on-line comments, please submit the following documents for sign-off.

1 Double Matte right-reading Océ or Photo Mylar of the COMPLETE SET of the Development Plan, Landscape Plan, and the Native Plant Preservation Plan (if part of the original submittal).
AND
1 Double Matte right-reading Océ or Photo Mylar of the Development Plan.
AND
1 CD that contains all of the drainage/hydrology and other reports submitted for the review and approval of this plan.

The extra Double Matte right-reading Océ or Photo Mylar that you submit will be delivered to Pima County for permanent recording. Additional blackline copies will be made from the complete mylar set and distributed to various review agencies for their files. These copies will be ordered from the City's contracted print company and billed to you unless you already have an account at another printing company. Please let us know which printing company you would prefer to use and list them on your attached transmittal form when submitting your mylars to the CDRC office for sign-off approval. Your printing company will deliver the mylar and two (2) blackline copies to your office. If you are out of town you will need to contact the printing company for pick up or mailing arrangement options.

TO ENSURE A MORE RAPID REVIEW OF THE MYLARS, PLEASE HAVE THE CITY OF TUCSON APPROVAL STAMP PLACED ON EACH SHEET OF THE SUBMITTAL SET, PREFERABLY IN THE LOWER RIGHT HAND CORNER NEAR THE TITLE BLOCK. THE STAMP IS LOCATED AT http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/CDRC Rezoning/CDRC/CDRC Stamp/cdrc stamp.html.

Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4919.

Sincerely,



Patricia Gehlen
CDRC Manager

All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/

Via fax: 622-9655