Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - DEV PLAN
Permit Number - D07-0034
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - DEV PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11/07/2007 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 11/14/2007 | FRODRIG2 | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | November 14, 2007 To: Chuck Schuiteman GD&A Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department ___________________________ From: Tom Porter, Sr. CEA (520-740-6579), representing the Pima County Departments of Wastewater Management and Environment Quality Subject: Country Club Industrial Park Dev. Plan – 2nd Submittal D07-034 The proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. Sheet 2: Show that MH#6096-01 was constructed under plan # G-94-046. 2nd request. Also some of the IMS #’/rim and invert elevations are missing for some of the public manholes shown on plan. Also the construction plan# and pipe size of the existing public sewer are missing for the southern portion of Country Club Rd. Sheet 2: Eliminate the New Public MH#1 which you call out on Country Club Rd. Sheet 2 & 4: Previous development plan and G-94-046 show that the two existing buildings and proposed building #3 will discharge to an on-site private lift station which discharges to MH#6096 via a private force main. Revise the drawing to show this and make sure to show all slopes/lengths/sizes and rim and invert elevations. 2nd request. The lift station has not been called out and the cleanouts/manholes in the same area have not been called out. Also the rim and invert elevations are missing for these sewer elements. Sheet 2: The callout for existing CO by proposed Bldg # 3 is missing. This office will require a revised set of bluelines, and a response letter, addressing these comments. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. Pima County Code Title 13.20.030.A.2 requires that a wastewater review fee be paid for each submittal of the development plan. The fee for the first submittal is $166 plus $50 per sheet. For the second submittal, the review fee is $50 per sheet. For all subsequent submittals, the review fee is $39 per sheet. The next submittal of this project will be the third(3rd) submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $39.00 (made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER) must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. If you have any questions regarding the above-mentioned comments, please contact me. |
| 11/27/2007 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 11/27/2007 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Approved | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: D07-0034 COUNTRY CLUB INDUSTRIAL/REVISED DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE: 11/27/07 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and we hereby approve this project. Submit a 24 x 36 Reverse Reading Double Matte Photo Mylar of approved Development Plan to City Planning. Signed and dated Mylar will be forwarded to Pima County Addressing prior to assignment of addresses. 2.) All addresses will need to be displayed per Pima County Address Standards at the time of final inspection. ES |
| 12/03/2007 | TERRY STEVENS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Terry Stevens Lead Planner PROJECT: D07-0034 Country Club Industrial Park Development Plan TRANSMITTAL: 12/03/07 DUE DATE: 12/07/07 COMMENTS: 1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is 09/05/08. 2. This comment has not been addressed. DS 2-05.2.2.B.3 In the "Site Data" portion of page 1 of 2 indicate the "subject to: " sections for the Commercial Storage and the Construction/Heavy Equipment Wholesaling for each zone (PI and I-1). Construction/Heavy Equipment Wholesaling Subject to: Sec. 3.5.5.1.H --(PI) Commercial Storage Subject to: Sec. 3.5.5.1.H-- (PI) Sec. 3.5.10.1-- (I1) 3. DS 2-05.2.4.I Zoning acknowledges that the abandonment of easements, tax parcel combination and the covenant regarding development and use of real property have been completed and recorded. Provide on the plan or in the notes the recording information (docket and page) for abandonment of easements. Provide a note stating that the covenant regarding development and use of real property has been completed and recorded. Provide docket and page recording information for the covenant in this note. 4. Ds 2-05.2.4.K This project is full code compliance for the entire site therefore clearly indicate that all existing handicap ramps meet the current code. Including truncated domes, location, slope, dimensions, etc. Clearly indicate the maximum slope of the handicap parking spaces and access aisles as per ANSI 117.1-2003 sec. 502.5 (max. 1:48) 5.. DS 2-05.2.4.P Provide a dimensioned detail of the new angled parking spaces located along the northwest side of building #1. See LUC Sec. 3.3.7.2 and table 3.3.7-I for criteria. Provide angle of the parking space also on the detail. 6. Depending on changes to the plan and responses to the above comments further comments may be forth coming. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Terry Stevens, (520) 837-4961 TLS C:\planning\cdrc\developmentplan\D07-0034-2dp.doc |
| 12/07/2007 | JOSE ORTIZ | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | |
| 12/10/2007 | ANDY VERA | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 12/11/2007 | CDRC1 | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Approv-Cond | >>> Jim Stoyanoff 12/10/2007 2:41 PM >>> Real Estate has the approval to abandon the 30' access easement and the one foot no access easement. I will be preparing documents for the Abandonment and the new one foot no access Easement. This should constitute a conditional approval with full approval upon recording of the documents. |
| 12/19/2007 | ELIZABETH EBERBACH | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | TO: Patricia Gehlen; CDRC Manager SUBJECT: County Club Industrial Development Plan Resubmittal Engineering Review REVIEWER: Elizabeth Eberbach LOCATION: Lots 3 and 4 of County Club Industrial ACTIVITY NUMBER: D07-0034 SUMMARY: The revised Development Plan package, including a revised Drainage Statement, revised Landscape documents, and response letter, was received by Development Services Department Engineering. Some of the previous comments have not been completely addressed. Development Services Department Engineering has reviewed the received items and does not recommend approval of the Development Plan at this time. The Drainage Statement was reviewed for development plan purposes only. DRAINAGE REPORT COMMENTS: 1) City of Tucson Development Standards (DS) Section No.10-02.2.3.1.3.A.2: The project is within the Rodeo Wash Watershed, a critical basin management area. Address the following drainage comments: a) DS Sec.10-02.2.3.1.6.A.4.a: It is imperative that the outlet is currently constructed per plans, and a bleed pipe is provided to facilitate project completion if post construction percolation tests do not provide adequate drain down time. b) DS Sec.2-05.3.2.A: It was stated in the response letter that a bleed pipe exists for the basin yet none is shown on the development plan. Show pipe and provide pipe invert elevations on Development Plan, or, provide current infiltration test results for existing basin. c) Provide a geotechnical report discussing suitability and feasibility of soils for proposed project. The report should discuss existing geotechnical conditions, and proposed recommendations for foundations and pavement design. Also include recommendations for slope grades and minimum distances from foundations. The report shall have minimum setbacks for basins from structures. Infiltration test results will be required to be submitted if drain down is not provided with a bleed pipe. The geotechnical report shall specifically address all criteria listed in this section. See last sentence of this section for items 6 (c) & (d) regarding hydro-collapsing soils and 30-foot test boring for basin design. Show how infiltration rates shall meet Water Harvesting and Detention / Retention criteria per DS Sec.10-01.III.3.5.1.3.a. 2) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.D.1, general note 23: It was stated in the response letter that the existing 40-ft (industrial) ribbon curb at Country Club is to be replaced with 25-ft vertical curb as per discussions with Jose Ortiz in Traffic. Clarify extent of vertical curbing along Country Club in Drainage Report. Vertical curb may obstruct jurisdictional flows from the east that is to be directed to the basin. Discuss in Drainage Statement how this change will affect conveyance of stormwater runoff from Country Club. 3) Show water surface elevations every 200-ft along jurisdictional flow area in PAAL. 4) Provide wall opening calculations for any proposed walls along Country Club. DEVELOPMENT PLAN COMMENTS: 5) DS Sec.2-05.2.3.E, 2-05.2.1.H: It will be necessary to provide a local benchmark for basis of elevation for this project. Provide datum for vertical data and existing topographic contour lines since elevations do not match old plans. 6) DS Sec.2-05.2.1.J: Clarify lot corner monuments in legend so that they match planview. 7) DS Sec.11-01.9: Label and depict any proposed walls on plan view. Provide cross section(s), indicate with dimension, the location of property line such that any proposed walls are fully within the property limits including footer construction area. Also clarify height of proposed wall on sections, and label wall openings for drainage per drainage report. 8) In response letter state status of completion of conditions of rezoning. In particular, show whether conditions 3-5 are reflected in plan view for Country Club right-of-way. In response letter a document was referenced stating acceptance of completion of rezoning conditions; submit copy of this approval. 9) DS Sec.2-5.3.2.D: Proposed project may not obstruct flows. Clarify extents of curb along Country Club and provide elevations for top of curb and existing adjacent grades. Provide more existing elevations within and around existing basin especially near any inlets and outlets. 10) Address the following drainage related comments: a) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.H.3: Roof downspouts are shown; provide locations of sidewalk scuppers. b) DS Sec.2-05.2.3.I.2, 2-05.2.4.H.1: Address the remaining floodplain comments: i) Provide a more legible delineation line for the 100-year flood limits. ii) Clarify floodplain limits as it passes around basin. iii) Show detention/retention basin 100-year ponding limits. iv) Label water surface contour intervals. The linear distance between water surface contour intervals should not exceed 200 feet. 11) DS Sec.2-05.2.3.C: The following information regarding existing public right-of-way for Country Club shall be provided: the name, right-of-way width, recordation data, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks, preferably in a cross section for clarity. This information must be shown on the Development Plan. Specifically clarify, depict, and label extents of paving, extents of existing curb, type of curb, radii of existing curb, any existing sidewalk, along with other right-of-way information. 12) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.D.1: It was stated in the response letter that the existing 40-ft (industrial) ribbon curb at Country Club is to be replaced with 25-ft vertical curb as per discussions with Jose Ortiz in Traffic. Clarify extent of vertical curbing along Country Club on Development Planview. Vertical curb may obstruct jurisdictional stormwater runoff from the east that is to be directed to the basin; proposed design shall not be in conflict with drainage recommendations of revised drainage report. Resubmittal is required. The next submittal should address all the above items. Submit a revised Development Plan, revised Drainage Statement, response letter, and other documentation. If you have questions or would like to set up a meeting, call me at 837-4934. Elizabeth Eberbach, PE Civil Engineer Engineering Division Development Services Department |
| 12/20/2007 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES December 20, 2007 Chuck Schuiteman, AIA Gromatzky Dupree & Associates, Southwest, LLC 250 South Craycroft Road, Suite 200 Tucson, Arizona 85711 Subject: D07-0034 Country Club Industrial Park Development Plan Dear Chuck: Your submittal of November 7, 2007 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 5 Copies Revised Development Plan (Wastewater, Zoning, Real Estate, Engineering, DSD) 3 Copies Revised Landscape Plan (Zoning, Engineering, DSD) 2 Copies Revised Drainage Report (Engineering, DSD) Please note that TIA has conditions of approval that must be addressed on the resubmittal of these plans. Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4919. Sincerely, Patricia Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 881-4390 |