Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Permit Number - D07-0033
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 07/27/2007 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 08/01/2007 | TIM ROWE | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | July 27, 2007 To: Tracy Brown National Survey & Engineering Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department ___________________________ From: Tom Porter, Sr. CEA (520-740-6579), representing the Pima County Departments of Wastewater Management and Environment Quality Subject: Tucson Mall Expansion Dev. Plan - 1st Submittal D07-033 The proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. Obtain a letter from the PCWMD's Development Services Section, written within the past 90 days, stating that treatment and conveyance system capacity for the project is available in the downstream public sewerage system and provide a copy of that letter to this office. The required form to request such a letter may be found at: http://www.pima.gov/wwm/forms/docs/CapResponseRequest.pdf. The development plan for this project cannot be approved until a copy of this letter has been received by this office. All Sheets: Show the jurisdiction’s case number, D07-033, in or near the title block of each sheet. This case number should be shown larger and bolder than any associated cross-reference numbers. Sheet 1: Revise General Note #8 to read as follows: Add a General Note that states: THE ON-SITE SANITARY SEWERS WILL BE PRIVATE AND WILL BE CONSTRUCTED, OPERATED AND MAINTAINED ON A PRIVATE BASIS, AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH AN APPROVED OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE PLAN, IF REQUIRED. THE LOCATION AND METHOD OF CONNECTION TO AN EXISTING PUBLIC SANITARY SEWER IS SUBJECT TO REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT. Sheet 7: The existing 8” sewer must be marked as private or public. Also the existing to be removed must be marked as private or public. Sheet 7 and 8: The existing sewer manholes should be numbered and the rim and invert elevations should be shown. Sheet 7: The sewer cleanouts should be marked as private and the rim and invert elevations should be shown. Sheet 7: The proposed sewer line segments between manholes and cleanouts should be marked with length/slope and size of pipe. Sheet 7 and 8: Where the 8” and 6” sewer main is shown manholes must be located at all bends and intersections of the sewer line. Also where the sewer line goes from 4” to 8” a manhole would be recommended. Sheet 7 and 8: The sewer directional flow arrows need to be shown on plan. Sheet 7: All proposed manholes should be numbered/marked as private and rim and invert elevations should be shown. Sheet 8: The key note for S-103A appears to be incorrect. This office will require a revised set of bluelines, and a response letter, addressing these comments. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. Pima County Code Title 13.20.030.A.2 requires that a wastewater review fee be paid for each submittal of the development plan. The fee for the first submittal is $166 plus $50 per sheet. For the second submittal, the review fee is $50 per sheet. For all subsequent submittals, the review fee is $39 per sheet. The next submittal of this project will be the second (2nd) submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $150.00 (made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER) must accompany the revised set of blue lines and response letter. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. If you have any questions regarding the above-mentioned comments, please contact me. |
| 08/06/2007 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | ADOT has NO COMMENT D07-0033 National Survey & Engineering Tucson Mall Expansion -------------------------------------------------------- Confidentiality and Nondisclosure Notice: This email transmission and any attachments are intended for use by the person(s)/entity(ies) named above and may contain confidential/privileged information. Any unauthorized use, disclosure or distribution is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by email, and delete or destroy all copies plus attachments. |
| 08/20/2007 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approv-Cond | The parking deck must comply with BC 402.7 or have automatic fire sprinklers. |
| 08/24/2007 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: D07-0033 TUCSON MALL EXPANSION/DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE: August 24, 2007 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: Delete Suite numbers on all sheets. These do not reflect what is current with Pima County records. Is the intent of this project to construct 3 new Restaurants and a Retail Building? (Please call me at 740-6480 to clarify) Delete #150 from building labeled “2 Levels”. jg |
| 08/27/2007 | JOSE ORTIZ | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Denied | August 27, 2007 ACTIVITY NUMBER: D07-0033 PROJECT NAME: Tucson Mall Expansion PROJECT ADDRESS: 4500 N Oracle Rd PROJECT REVIEWER: Jose E. Ortiz PE, Traffic Engineer Resubmittal Required: Traffic Engineering does not recommend approval of the Development Plan; therefore a revised Development Plan is required for re-submittal. The following items must be revised or added to the development plan. 1. Include a response letter with the next submittal that states how all comments have been addressed. 2. Provide a Traffic Impact Analysis discussing warranted off-site improvements along Wetmore, Stone, and Oracle including intersection improvements at signalized locations. 3. A private improvement agreement (PIA) will be necessary for the proposed work to be performed within the Right-of-way. An approved tentative plat is required prior to applying for a PIA. Contact the PIA Coordinator for additional PIA information at 791-5550 ext. 1107. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-4259 x76730 or Jose.Ortiz@tucsonaz.gov |
| 08/28/2007 | WILLDAN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 08/28/2007 | WILLDAN | ZONING | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 08/28/2007 | ANDY VERA | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Denied | 1. No provisions shown or mentioned for on site refuse collection. Must comply with DS 6-01.0. Identify collection area for each new bldg, show service vehicle maneuverability within development, and provide refuse and recycle enclosure detail. 2. Site plan general notes mentions recycling. Recommend designing enclosures to accomodate both refuse and recycle containers to support the disposal needs of each building/business. Please clarify on resubmittal. |
| 08/28/2007 | WILLDAN | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 09/05/2007 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Denied | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT D07-0033 Tucson Mall Expansion 09/04/07 ( ) Tentative Plat (XXXX) Development Plan (XXXX) Landscape Plan ( ) Revised Plan/Plat ( ) Board of Adjustment ( ) Other - Elevations CROSS REFERENCE: Annexation C9-82-48, Ordinance No. 5651 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: North Stone GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: COMMENTS DUE BY: 8/24/07 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: ( ) No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment ( ) Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions ( ) RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies ( ) See Additional Comments Attached ( ) No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: (XXXX) Resubmittal Required: ( ) Tentative Plat ( ) Development Plan (XXXX) Landscape Plan (XXXX) Other - Elevations and Color Palette REVIEWER: D. R.Corral 791-4505 DATE: 8/31/07 The General Plan, North Stone Neighborhood Plan (NSNP), Design Guidelines Manual and the Stone Avenue Corridor: Measures for a Livable Corridor all provide guidance for the review of this development. 1. The Stone Avenue Corridor: Measures for a Livable Corridor states that design proposals for properties adjacent to Stone Avenue should demonstrate sensitivity to nearby neighborhoods. The NSNP also requires sensitivity to design and compatibility with existing area. The Design Guidelines Manual states this should be done through four-sided architecture and detail comparable to the front façade, with consistent design treatment, including but not limited to, comparable color palette, signs, rooflines, and materials. Please submit color elevations of all four sides of the proposed buildings. Please design side and rear building façades with attention to architectural character and detail comparable to the front façade. 2. The NSNP and the Design Guidelines Manual state that the use of vegetation should be used within the parking areas to reduce heat build-up. Please provide vegetation islands, which include shade trees, within the parking areas. 3. The General Plan and Design Guidelines Manual state that signs should be incorporated with and improve the aesthetics of a development. Plans also have policies that promote signage that is clear, but is not the dominant feature of the development. Please provide the desired sign package for the proposed uses. |
| 09/11/2007 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Denied | 4350 E. Irvington Road, Tucson, AZ 85714 Post Office Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702 WR#185703 September 11, 2007 National Survey & Engineering Attn: Tracy Brown 16745 W Bluemound Road Brookfield, WI 53005 Dear Ms. Brown: SUBJECT: Tucson Mall Expansion D07-0033 Tucson Electric Power Company (TEP) has reviewed the plan submitted July 31, 2007. TEP is unable to approve the plan at this time. There are existing electrical facilities within the boundaries of this project. In order for TEP to approve the plan the facilities and easements must be depicted on the plans. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facility map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. All costs associated with the relocation of the facilities in conflict will be billable to the developer. Please resubmit two revised bluelines to City of Tucson for TEP's review. You may contact the area Designer, Warren McElyea, at 918-8268 should you have any questions. Sincerely, Elizabeth Miranda Office Specialist lm Enclosure cc: DSD_CDRC@Tucsonaz.gov, City of Tucson W. McElyea, Tucson Electric Power |
| 09/12/2007 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | DATE: September 12, 2007 TO: DSD_CDRC@ tucsonaz.gov FROM: Glenn Hicks Parks and Recreation 791-4873 ext. 215 Glenn.Hicks@tucsonaz.gov SUBJECT: D07-0033 Tucson Mall Expansion: Development Plan Staff has no comments. |
| 09/13/2007 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES September 13, 2007 Tracy Brown, P.E. National Survey & Engineering 16745 West Bluemound Road Brookfield, WI 53005 Subject: D07-0033 Tucson Mall Expansion Development Plan Dear Tracy: Your submittal of July 31, 2007 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 7 Copies Revised Development Plan (Wastewater, Addressing, Traffic, ESD, DUPD, TEP, DSD) 2 Copies Revised Landscape Plan (DUPD, DSD) 2 Copies Color Elevations and Sign Package (DUPD, DSD) 2 Copies Traffic Impact Analysis (Traffic, DSD) PLEASE NOTE THAT THE ZONING, LANDSCAPE AND ENGINEERING REVIEWS ARE BEING DONE BY WILLDAN, THIRD PARTY. Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4919. Sincerely, Patricia Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: (262) 781-8466 |