Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - DEV PLAN
Permit Number - D07-0031
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - DEV PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10/12/2007 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 10/17/2007 | FRODRIG2 | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Approved | October 17, 2007 To: Andrew Ogas Indevco Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department ___________________________ From: Tom Porter, Sr. CEA (520-740-6579), representing the Pima County Departments of Wastewater Management and Environment Quality Subject: Aeris Dental Dev. Plan – 2nd Submittal(revised) D07-031 The proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. The Pima County Department of Environmental Quality and Wastewater Management Department hereby approve the above referenced submittal of the development plan as submitted. Please note the following: Approval of the above referenced submittal does not authorize the construction of public or private sewer collection lines, or water distribution lines. Prior to the construction of such features, a Construction Authorization (Approval To Construct) may need to be obtained from the Pima County Environmental Quality. Also, air quality activity permits must be secured by the developer or prime contractor from the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality before constructing, operating or engaging in an activity which may cause or contribute to air pollution. If you have any questions regarding the above-mentioned comments, please contact me. |
| 10/19/2007 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Approv-Cond | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: D07-0031 AERIS DENTAL/REVISED DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE: October 19, 2007 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and we hereby approve this project. NOTE: Submit a 24 x 36 Reverse Reading Double Matte Photo Mylar of approved Development Plan to City Planning. Signed and dated Mylar will be forwarded to Pima County Addressing prior to assignment of addresses. 2.) All addresses will need to be displayed per Pima County Address Standards at the time of final inspection. jg |
| 10/30/2007 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 11/02/2007 | GLYNDA ROTHWELL | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Denied | <<Aeris Dental WR#185264 D0-0031.doc>> SUBJECT: Aeris Dental D07-0031 Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the development plan submitted October 25, 2007 It appears that there are conflicts with the existing facilities within the boundaries of this proposed development. |
| 11/02/2007 | GLYNDA ROTHWELL | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Denied | 4350 E. Irvington Road, Tucson, AZ 85714 Post Office Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702 WR#185264 November 2, 2007 Dear : Andrew Ogas: SUBJECT: Aeris Dental D07-0031 Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the development plan submitted October 25, 2007 It appears that there are conflicts with the existing facilities within the boundaries of this proposed development. The existing transformer SRH-4 is located within the building pad for this development, transformer relocate, underground electric line relocation, and re-feed of existing electric service will be required. All relocation costs are billable to the customer. In order to apply for electric service, call the New Construction Department at (520) 918-8300. Submit a final set of plans including approved site, offsite and electrical load plans. Include a CD with the AutoCAD version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Your final plans should be sent to: Tucson Electric Power Company Attn: Ms. Mary Boice New Business Project Manager P. O. Box 711 (DB-101) Tucson, AZ 85702 520-917-8732 Please call the area Designer Steve Garcia at (520) 917-8739, should you have any questions. Sincerely, Henrietta Noriega Office Specialist Design/Build hn Enclosures cc: City of Tucson, (Email only) S. Garcia, Tucson Electric Power |
| 11/06/2007 | TERRY STEVENS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Terry Stevens Lead Planner PROJECT: D07-0031 Aeris Dental Development Plan TRANSMITTAL: 11/06/07 DUE DATE: 08/07/07 COMMENTS: 1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is 08/06/08. 2. This comment has not been addressed. DS 2-05.2.2.B.11 List the gross area of the site by square footage and acreage. Provide square footage and remove "more or less" 3. DS 2-05.2.3.B All easements shall be drawn on the plan. The recordation information (docket and page), location, width, and purpose of all easements on site will be stated. Note #1 & #39 indicates an existing electrical easement. Provide a space for the docket and page recording information for the abandonment of this easement. The docket and page information can then be filled in at a later time but must be provided prior to final approval of the development plan. 4. DS 2-05.2.4.A Per County Assessors records there appears to have been a lot split done in 2007. Provide documentation indicating that the split has been approved by the DSD section of the City of Tucson. I have spoken with Patricia Gehlen regarding the lot split question. The development plan by it self does not constitute a lot split. A separate walk through process is required to complete the lot split. The development plan as submitted can be used as part of the lot split submittal. Provide 3 copies of a drawing showing the entire parcel and the proposed split, legal descriptions of both parcels, a copy of the proposed development plan and submit for a lot split at DSD. 5. Provide distance and bearings for the north property line. 6. DS 2-05.2.4.D The proposed turnaround (cul-de-sac) located on the adjacent vacant property will require to have a note indicating that any development of the vacant property adjoining the "turn around area" will require a separate development plan. 7. This comment has not been addressed. DS 2-05.2.4.K The truncated domes indicated on the site plan and details are not located in the proper location. Truncated domes are required to be where the access aisle meets the landing of the handicap ramp with a depth of 24" and the full width of the landing. 8. This comment has not been addressed. Per LUC Sec. 3.4.4.1.B.2 on projects with more than one building loading spaces shall be provided for each building. Change the number of required loading zones in the notes from one to two. FYI: The loading zone requirement section of the LUC has been recently revised. See Sec 3.4.5 for the changes which may be of benefit in the design of this project. The loading zone for the 4800 sq.ft. building does not need to be a 12 x 35. The above comment appears to have been used on this plan. Clearly indicate the sizes of the required and provided loading zones in the notes. 9. DS 2-05.2.4.P The minimum height above grade to the bottom of the handicap parking sign is seven (7) feet per City of Tucson standards. Remove note stating signs are to be mounted on the wall in front of the parking spaces as it appears the signs are to be post mounted as indicated on the plan. 10. Depending on changes to the plan and responses to the above comments further comments may be forth coming. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Terry Stevens, (520) 837-4961 TLS C:\planning\cdrc\developmentplan\D07-0031-2dp.doc |
| 11/14/2007 | ANDY VERA | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Denied | 1. DP.1, 6 Refuse enclosure detail - Must identify cane bolt sleeves positioned within concrete where gates are closed and opened. Not shown just annotated. 2. Clarify intended turnaround for refuse service vehicle. A. Drawing shows a T-turnaround however has loading zones included which is therefore a conflict and not acceptable. B. Keynote (42) references cul-de-sac type turnaround as temporary. Please correct and clarify on resubmittal. If you have any questions you may contact Andy Vera at (520) 791-5543 ext 1212 or E-mail:Andy.Vera@tucsonaz.gov |
| 11/20/2007 | PATRICIA GILBERT | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | TO: Patricia Gehlen; CDRC Coordinator DATE: November 20, 2007 SUBJECT: Engineering review of the Aeris Dental Development Plan. The activity number is D07-0031. SUMMARY: The Development Plan and Drainage Report were received by Engineering on October 12th, 2007. Engineering has reviewed the received items and does not recommend approval of the Development Plan or the Drainage Report. RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: DEVELOPMENT PLAN, DRAINAGE REPORT GENERAL COMMENTS 1. The Drainage Report was reviewed for Development Plan purposes only. 2. A Grading Plan Review and Permit will be required. 3. Proposed developments exceeding 1 acre of disturbance are subject to AzPDES requirements. The next submittal must address the following items: DEVELOPMENT PLAN 1. Provide the site boundary information for the north property line. DS 2-05.2.3.A. 2. Keynote 1 indicates abandonment of the electrical easement. Provide the recordation data of the abandonement. Revise as necessary. Second request. DS 2-05.2.3.B. 3. Indicate the width for the existing sidewalk from the existing building to the sidewalk along Rita Ranch Road. DS 2-05.2.3.C. 4. The proposed turnaround located on the adjacent vacant property requires an access easement. Provide a copy of the documentation for the cross access agreement between the two properties and the easement recordation data on the plan. Indicate on the plan if the easement is public or private. DS 2-05.2.4.D. The above comment is from the previous review and appears to not be addressed. The response letter stated two copies of the access easement was submitted. The copies were not provided and the information was not provided on the plan. 5. Indicate in keynote 58 and 59 if the wall are existing or proposed. DS 2-05.2.3.G. 6. Provide the 100-year water surface elevation for the east offsite channel. DS 2-05.2.3.I.3. The above comment is from the previous review and has not been adequately addressed. It is acknowledged the plan shows the line weight for the 100 year water surface elevation (WSE), however the actual elevation has not been provided. Provide the actual elevation for the 100-year WSE. 7. Provide spot elevations and finish floor elevations (as applicable) for cross section A-A and B-B. DS 2-05.2.4.H.4. The above comment is from the previous review and has not been adequately addressed. Provide for cross section A-A at spot elevation at the property line and finish grades at the bottom of the channel and parking lot. Provide for cross section B-B a spot elevation at the property line. Revise. 8. The revised development plan must show roof drainage and location of all concentration points. If downspout locations cross pedestrian circulation areas the drainage report must provide calculations and detail for scupper sizing to show that the 10-year flow is contained under the sidewalk with the appropriate details provided on the development plan. The above comment is from the previous review and has not been adequately addressed. Show the location of roof drainage and concentration points at surface. If applicable provide suppers at the concentration points. DRAINAGE REPORT COMMENTS 1. The revised development plan must show roof drainage and location of all concentration points. If downspout locations cross pedestrian circulation areas the drainage report must provide calculations and detail for scupper sizing to show that the 10-year flow is contained under the sidewalk. If applicable provide information; see above comment 8. |
| 11/21/2007 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES November 21, 2007 Andrew L. Ogas Indevco A&E, Inc. 5995 East Grant Road, #111 Tucson, Arizona 85712 Subject: D07-0031 Aeris Dental Development Plan Dear Andrew: Your submittal of October 12, 2007 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 5 Copies Revised Development Plan (TEP, ESD, Zoning, Engineering, DSD) 4 Copies Revised Landscape Plan (Landscape, Zoning, Engineering, DSD) 2 Copies City Approved Lot Split Documents (Zoning, DSD) 2 Copies Revised Drainage Report (Engineering, DSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4919. Sincerely, Patricia Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 545-0092 |