Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Permit Number - D07-0031
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 07/10/2007 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 07/11/2007 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 07/17/2007 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | ADOT has NO COMMENT D07-0031 INDEVCO A&E, INC. AERIS DENTAL -------------------------------------------------------- Confidentiality and Nondisclosure Notice: This email transmission and any attachments are intended for use by the person(s)/entity(ies) named above and may contain confidential/privileged information. Any unauthorized use, disclosure or distribution is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by email, and delete or destroy all copies plus attachments. |
| 07/18/2007 | TIM ROWE | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | July 17, 2007 To: Andrew Ogas Indevco Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department ___________________________ From: Tom Porter, Sr. CEA (520-740-6579), representing the Pima County Departments of Wastewater Management and Environment Quality Subject: Aeris Dental Dev. Plan - 1st Submittal D07-031 The proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. Obtain a letter from the PCWMD's Development Services Section, written within the past 90 days, stating that treatment and conveyance system capacity for the project is available in the downstream public sewerage system and provide a copy of that letter to this office. The required form to request such a letter may be found at: http://www.pima.gov/wwm/forms/docs/CapResponseRequest.pdf. The for this project cannot be approved until a copy of this letter has been received by this office. All Sheets: Show the jurisdiction's case number, D07-031, in or near the title block of each sheet. This case number should be shown larger and bolder than any associated cross-reference numbers. Sheet 1: Show the public and private sewer lines using different line-types, so that they can readily be distinguished from each other. Also, show and describe examples of these different linetypes in the legend on Sheet 1. Sheet 1: The sewer symbols in legend are not consistent with what is shown on the plan in Sheet. Also there is no symbol in the legend for existing manhole. Sheet 1:Add a General Note that states: THIS PROJECT WILL HAVE ______ EXISTING AND______ PROPOSED WASTEWATER FIXTURE UNIT EQUIVALENTS PER TABLE 13.20.045(E)(1) IN PIMA COUNTY CODE 13.20.045(E). And fill in the blanks with the appropriate values. Sheet 1: Add a General Note that states: ANY WASTEWATER DISCHARGED INTO THE PUBLIC SANITARY SEWERAGE SYSTEM SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE INDUSTRIAL WASTE ORDINANCE (PIMA COUNTY ORDINANCE NO. 1991-140, AS AMENDED). Sheet 1: Revise the wastewater management note to read as follows: THE ON-SITE SANITARY SEWERS WILL BE PRIVATE AND WILL BE CONSTRUCTED, OPERATED AND MAINTAINED ON A PRIVATE BASIS, AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH AN APPROVED OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE PLAN, IF REQUIRED. THE LOCATION AND METHOD OF CONNECTION TO AN EXISTING PUBLIC SANITARY SEWER IS SUBJECT TO REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT. Sheet 1: Add a Permitting Note that states: A PROJECT CONSTRUCTION PERMIT MUST BE SECURED FROM PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT BEFORE BEGINNING ANY WORK ON THIS PROJECT. Sheet 2: The rim and invert elevations should be shown for the existing public manholes. They should also be marked as public. Sheet 2: The existing private sewer line should be shown w/pipe size/slope and length of pipe. Also the private manhole rim and invert elevation should be shown. Sheet 2: The sewer line running to the building should be marked as BCS and the pipe slope/length and material of pipe should be shown. Cleanouts w/rim and invert elevations should be shown on the plan at all bends. This office will require a revised set of bluelines, and a response letter, addressing these comments. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. Pima County Code Title 13.20.030.A.2 requires that a wastewater review fee be paid for each submittal of the . The fee for the first submittal is $166 plus $50 per sheet. For the second submittal, the review fee is $50 per sheet. For all subsequent submittals, the review fee is $39 per sheet. The next submittal of this project will be the second (2nd) submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $100.00 (made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER) must accompany the revised set of blue lines and response letter. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. If you have any questions regarding the above-mentioned comments, please contact me. |
| 07/20/2007 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Approved | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN COMMENTS Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT D07-0031 Aeris Dental ( ) Tentative Plat (ü) Development Plan (ü) Landscape Plan ( ) Revised Plan/Plat ( ) Board of Adjustment ( ) Other CROSS REFERENCE: N/A NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Houghton Area Master Plan GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: N/A COMMENTS DUE BY: August 7, 2007 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: ( ) No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment (ü) Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions ( ) RCP Proposal Complies with Plan Policies ( ) See Additional Comments Attached ( ) No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on (ü) No Resubmittal Required ( ) Tentative Plat ( ) Development Plan ( ) Landscape Plan ( ) Other REVIEWER: J. Hershenhorn 791-4505 DATE: 7/16/07 |
| 08/01/2007 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Indicate required screening for the loading zones located adjacent to the east property line. A 6-foot masonry screen wall is required per LUC Table 3.7.2-I. Also a 5-foot masonry screen wall is required to screen the parking lot area from the O-3 zoned properties to the east and to the south per LUC Table 3.7.2-I. 2. Within a vehicular use area every parking space shall be located within forty (40) feet of the trunk of a canopy tree (as measured from the center of the tree trunk) per LUC 3.7.2.3.A.1.a. Some of the parking spaces to the west of the proposed building do not meet this requirement. Revise as necessary. 3. Add the common name for Celtis pallida (Desert Hackberry) to the plant list on sheet L2. |
| 08/02/2007 | CDRC1 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Approved | >>> "Tom Cooney" <tCooney@pagnet.org> 08/01/2007 4:19 PM >>> CASE: D07-0031, AERIS DENTAL, DEVEL PLAN COMMENT: NO OBJECTIONS OR ADVERSE COMMENTS Vehicle Trip Generation: Daily: 439 PM Peak: 45 Please call if you have questions Tom Cooney, Travel Forecasting Manager Pima Association of Governments 177 N. Church Ave, #405 Tucson, AZ 85701 Tel: (520) 792-1093, Fax: (520) 620-6981 Web: www.PAGnet.org and www.RTAmobility.com |
| 08/02/2007 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Denied | 4350 E. Irvington Road, Tucson, AZ 85714 Post Office Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702 WR# 185264 August 2, 2007 Indevco A & E, Inc. Attn: Andrew L. Ogas 5995 E Grant Rd Ste. 111 Tucson, Arizona 85712 Dear Mr Ogas: SUBJECT: AERIS DENTAL D07-0031 Tucson Electric Power Company (TEP) has reviewed the plan submitted May 25, 2007. TEP is unable to approve the plan at this time. There are existing electrical facilities within the boundaries of this project that will need to be relocated. Existing transformer SRH-4 is located within the building pad for this development, transformer relocate, UG electric line relocation, and refeed of existing electric service will be required. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facility map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. All costs associated with the relocation of the facilities in conflict will be billable to the developer. Please resubmit two revised bluelines to City of Tucson Development Services Department for TEP's review. You may contact the area Designer, Steve Garcia at 917-8739 should you have any technical questions. Sincerely, Henrietta Noriega Office Specialist hn Enclosure cc: P. Gehlen and F. Rodriguez, City of Tucson (by e-mail) S. Garcia, Tucson Electric Power |
| 08/06/2007 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: D07-0031 AERIS DENTAL/DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE: 8/03/07 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: 1.) Label section corners on Location Map. 2.) Correct Rita Road to Rita Ranch Road (east of Houghton Road) on Location Map. 3.) Correct Rita Road to Rita Ranch Road on Sheet 2. es |
| 08/06/2007 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | DATE: August 06, 2007 TO: DSD_CDRC@ tucsonaz.gov FROM: Glenn Hicks Parks and Recreation 791-4873 ext. 215 Glenn.Hicks@tucsonaz.gov SUBJECT: D07-0031 Aeris Dental: Development Plan(7-10-07) Staff has no comments. |
| 08/06/2007 | CDRC1 | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Approved | D07-0031 AERIS DENTAL >>> Jim Stoyanoff 08/06/2007 2:33 PM >>> No comment. |
| 08/09/2007 | ANDY VERA | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Sheet DP.1, Refuse enclosure Gates must be equipped with the ability to be secured in the open position during service and when closed. DS 6-01.4.2.C.4. Demonstrate within detail & annotate, " positive locking with (bayonet) anchors, Qty-4, 1" dia. x 6" long galvanized pipe flush with concrete." Recommend gates open at 180 degrees where possible or minimum of 12' with anchors appropriately positioned. 2. Sheet DP.2, Site DP. A. Keynote 13 identifies as "proposed access ramp - type ll. Drawing appears to reflect as the refuse enclosure, if not, adequately show refuse enclosure on site plan and keynotes. Clarify. B. Show service vehicle turning radii for entering and exiting development from and to Rita Rd and circulation and manueverability within. Please correct on resubmittal. |
| 08/09/2007 | JOSE ORTIZ | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | |
| 08/10/2007 | TERRY STEVENS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Terry Stevens Lead Planner PROJECT: D07-0031 Aeris Dental Development Plan TRANSMITTAL: 08/10/07 DUE DATE: 08/07/07 COMMENTS: 1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is 08/06/08. 2. DS 2-05.2.1.D A small, project-location map shall be drawn on the first sheet of the development plan, preferably in the upper right corner. The map should cover approximately one (1) square mile, be drawn at a minimum scale of 3" = 1 mile, and provide the following information. 1. Section corners will be labeled. 3. DS 2-05.2.1.G The following title block information is to be provided, preferably in the lower right corner of the sheet. 1. The proposed name of the project or, if there is no name, the proposed tenant's name or the property address. 2. A brief legal description. 4. DS 2-05.2.1.K Applicable rezoning, annexation, or subdivision case numbers should be listed in the lower right corner, next to the title block. Annexation case # C9-84-84 is to be listed as per above. 5. DS 2-05.2.2.B.2 This project has been assigned the case number D07-0031. List the case number in the lower right corner next to the title block of all plan sheets including the Landscape and NPPO sheets. 6. DS 2-05.2.2.B.11 List the gross area of the site by square footage and acreage. 7. DS 2-05.2.3.B All easements shall be drawn on the plan. The recordation information (docket and page), location, width, and purpose of all easements on site will be stated. 8. DS 2-05.2.4.A Per County Assessors records there appears to have been a lot split done in 2007. Provide documentation indicating that the split has been approved by the DSD section of the City of Tucson. 9. DS 2-05.2.4.D The proposed turnaround (cul-de-sac) located on the adjacent vacant property will require to have a note indicating that any development of the vacant property adjoining the "turn around area" will require a separate development plan. Provide a copy of the documentation for the cross access agreement between the two properties. The access easement around the "turn around area" will require recordation information (docket and page) to be provided on the development plan. 10. DS 2-05.2.4.K The truncated domes indicated on the site plan and details are not located in the proper location. Truncated domes are required to be where the access aisle meets the landing of the handicap ramp with a depth of 24" and the full width of the landing. 11. DS 2-05.2.4.O Clearly indicate the maneuverability for vehicles in and out of the proposed loading zones. See engineering comments. Per LUC Sec. 3.4.4.1.B.2 on projects with more than one building loading spaces shall be provided for each building. Change the number of required loading zones in the notes from one to two. FYI: The loading zone requirement section of the LUC has been recently revised. See Sec 3.4.5 for the changes which may be of benefit in the design of this project. The loading zone for the 4800 sq.ft. building does not need to be a 12 x 35. 12. DS 2-05.2.4.P Provide on the detail for the handicap parking spaces and on the site plan the location of the handicap parking signs. Keep in mind that the signs cannot block pedestrian circulation or be in the overhang area for the parking space.. 13. DS 2-05.2.4.Q Please provide a plan view detail of the proposed class 1 and class 2 bicycle parking spaces. Single rack spaces placed in a row will allow a minimum of seventy -two (72) inch length per bicycle parking space and a minimum of thirty (30) inches between outer spaces of racks. A five (5) foot wide access aisle measured from the front or rear of the seventy-two (72) inch long parking space will be provided beside each row. Lighting will be provided such that all facilities are thoroughly illuminated and visible from adjacent sidewalks, parking lots, or buildings, during working hours. The surface of the facility can be surfaced the same as for motor vehicle parking or with a minimum of one (1) inch thickness of one-fourth (1/4) inch aggregate material. Provide a detail of the class 1 type bicycle locker. 14. DS 2-05.2.4.V Please indicate the location and type of postal service to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements. If mail is to be delivered to an area within a building please state so on the plan. 15. DS 2-05.2.4.W If applicable, provide location and types of existing or proposed signage, including wall, freestanding, pedestal, and billboards. 16. Depending on changes to the plan and responses to the above comments further comments may be forth coming. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Terry Stevens, (520) 837-4961 TLS C:\planning\cdrc\developmentplan\D07-0031dp.doc |
| 08/10/2007 | PGEHLEN1 | TUCSON WATER NEW AREA DEVELOPMENT | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 08/14/2007 | ED ABRIGO | PIMA COUNTY | ASSESSOR | Passed | |
| 09/14/2007 | PATRICIA GILBERT | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | TO: Patricia Gehlen; CDRC Coordinator DATE: September 14, 2007 SUBJECT: Engineering review of the Aeris Dental Development Plan. The activity number is D07-0031. SUMMARY: The Development Plan and Drainage Report were received by Engineering on July 10th, 2007. Engineering has reviewed the received items and does not recommend approval of the Development Plan or the Drainage Report. RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: DEVELOPMENT PLAN, DRAINAGE REPORT GENERAL COMMENTS 1. The Drainage Report was reviewed for Development Plan purposes only. 2. A Grading Plan and Permit may be required. Proposed grading in excess of 5,000 yards is designated "engineered grading" and a soils engineering report is required with the Grading Plan submittal. Development Standards 11-01.4.1.C. The Soils Report must also address the requirements detailed in the Standards Manual for Drainage Design and Floodplain Management, SMDDFM, 14.2.6. 3. Proposed developments exceeding 1 acre of disturbance are subject to AzPDES requirements. 4. Proposed fills in excess of two feet above existing grade at any location in the outer one hundred feet of the developing site adjacent to residentially zoned property require the procedure outlined in Development Standards 11-01.8.1. This process must be complete prior to Grading Plan approval. The next submittal must address the following items: DEVELOPMENT PLAN 1. Provide the section corners for the location map. DS 2-05.2.1.D.3. 2. Provide a title block with the information and required format found in DS 2-05.2.1.G. 3. Provide the development plan case number D07-0031 on all sheets of the development package and the cover page of the drainage report. 4. Provide the site boundary information for C1. DS 2-05.2.3.A. 5. Provide cut and fill quantities for the project. DS 2-02.2.1.A.17. 6. All easements shall be drawn on the plan. The recordation information, location, width, and purpose of all easements on site will be stated. Blanket easements should be listed in the notes, together with recordation data and their proposed status. Should an easement not be in use and be proposed for vacation or have been abandoned, so indicate. However, should the easement be in conflict with any proposed building location, vacation of the easement is to occur prior to issuance of permits. Keynote 1 indicates abandonment of the electrical easement. Provide the recordation data of the abandonement. Revise as necessary. DS 2-05.2.3.B. 7. Indicate the existing sidewalk width for Rita Road in keynote 6. DS 2-05.2.3.C. 8. The maneuverability for the vehicle utilizing the loading space looks limited. Show the loading vehicle maneuverability for the required loading space. The minimum requirements for a 30' single unit vehicle is an outside radius of 42' and inside radius of 28'. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. 9. The proposed turnaround located on the adjacent vacant property requires an access easement. Provide a copy of the documentation for the cross access agreement between the two properties and the easement recordation data on the plan. Indicate on the plan if the easement is public or private. DS 2-05.2.4.D. 10. Significant conditions on the site, such as major rock outcrops, structures, fences, walls, etc., shall be shown. These elements should be indicated in a different line weight than the proposed improvements and labeled to be removed or retained. Callout existing perimeter walls on the plan. DS 2-05.2.3.G. 11. In addition to the above comment, call out the existing drainage structure located at the entrance of the property. DS 2-05.2.3.G. 12. Provide the 100-year water surface elevation for the east offsite channel. DS 2-05.2.3.I.3. 13. Provide spot elevations and finish floor elevations (as applicable) for cross section A-A and B-B. DS 2-05.2.4.H.4. 14. Provide dimensions for keynote 18. DS 2-05.2.4.H.3. 15. Draw locations and indicate quantity of off-site runoff acceptance points and/or on-site runoff discharge points. DS 2-05.2.4.H.7. 16. The revised development plan must show roof drainage and location of all concentration points. If downspout locations cross pedestrian circulation areas the drainage report must provide calculations and detail for scupper sizing to show that the 10-year flow is contained under the sidewalk with the appropriate details provided on the development plan. 17. Place a note on the plan, "All roof downspouts shall be routed under any adjacent sidewalk". Sidewalks must be flood free for up to the ten year event. DS 2-08.4.1.E 18. The specific maintenance notes specified in the Standards Manual for Drainage Design and Floodplain Management, SMDDFM, 14.3 must be included on the Development Plan. 19. Additional comments could be forthcoming depending on how each comment has been addressed. DRAINAGE REPORT COMMENTS 1. The revised development plan must show roof drainage and location of all concentration points. If downspout locations cross pedestrian circulation areas the drainage report must provide calculations and detail for scupper sizing to show that the 10-year flow is contained under the sidewalk. 2. Section B, "Offsite Drainage," provides discussion on the existing channel located on the north side of the property. The discussion states the channel is not getting as much discharge as it was originally designed for due to the Richmond American Homes Development. Provide conformation either with the appropriate documentation from the original drainage report for Richmond American Holmes at Rita Ranch or a new analysis with calculations and discussion to further substantiate the discussion provided in Section B, "Offsite Drainage." 3. Provide on all submitted drainage maps (existing offsite, existing and proposed drainage maps) the 100-year discharge. DS 2-05.2.4.H.7. |
| 09/17/2007 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES September 17, 2007 Andrew L. Ogas Indevco A&E, Inc. 5995 East Grant Road, #111 Tucson, Arizona 85712 Subject: D07-0031 Aeris Dental Development Plan Dear Andrew: Your submittal of July 10, 2007 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 8 Copies Revised Development Plan (Wastewater, Landscape, TEP, Addressing, ESD, Zoning, Engineering, DSD) 4 Copies Revised Landscape Plan (Landscape, Zoning, Engineering, DSD) 2 Copies City Approved Lot Split Documents (Zoning, DSD) 2 Copies Revised Drainage Report (Engineering, DSD) 2 Copies Cross Access Agreement (Zoning, DSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4919. Sincerely, Patricia Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 545-0092 |