Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - DEV PLAN
Permit Number - D07-0030
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - DEV PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11/07/2007 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 11/14/2007 | FRODRIG2 | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | November 14, 2007 To: Hank Hulbert LEADS Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department ___________________________ From: Tom Porter, Sr. CEA (520-740-6579), representing the Pima County Departments of Wastewater Management and Environment Quality Subject: Circle K SWC E. Valencoa Road & S. Nogales HWY Tucson, AZ. Dev. Plan – 2nd Submittal D07-030 The proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. Obtain a letter from the PCWMD's Development Services Section, written within the past 90 days, stating that treatment and conveyance system capacity for the project is available in the downstream public sewerage system and provide a copy of that letter to this office. The required form to request such a letter may be found at: http://www.pima.gov/wwm/forms/docs/CapResponseRequest.pdf. The development plan for this project cannot be approved until a copy of this letter has been received by this office. 2nd request. Sheet 2: The existing public sewer line does not match what is shown in the Legend. Sheet 3: The existing public sewer should be shown running north thru the intersection and running along Valencia north of the property. 2nd request. This office will require a revised set of bluelines, and a response letter, addressing these comments. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. Pima County Code Title 13.20.030.A.2 requires that a wastewater review fee be paid for each submittal of the development plan. The fee for the first submittal is $166 plus $50 per sheet. For the second submittal, the review fee is $50 per sheet. For all subsequent submittals, the review fee is $39 per sheet. The next submittal of this project will be the third(3rd) submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $78.00 (made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER) must accompany the revised set of blue lines and response letter. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. If you have any questions regarding the above-mentioned comments, please contact me. |
| 11/23/2007 | KAROL ARAGONEZ | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Karol Aragonez Planner PROJECT: D07-0030 Circle K Store Development Plan TRANSMITTAL DATE: November 18, 2007 DUE DATE: December 7, 2007 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. List the rezoning case number C9-06-10 in the lower right corner next to the title block of all sheets of the landscape and NPPO plan. DS 2-05.2.1.K & DS 2-05.2.4.K 2. Please provide the MS&R building setback from both streets from back of future curb. Indicate location of future curb on development plan 3. It appears that the pedestrian connection made to Nogales Highway will be done during Phase 2. A pedestrian connection to the street must be provided within Phase 1 construction to meet the requirement of DS 2-08.4.1.A incase Phase 2 is never built out. DS 2-08.4.1.A 4. Please dimension the PAAL between the edge of the Phase 2 loading space and standard parking spaces to assure a twenty-four (24) foot wide PAAL has been provided/ 5. Please dimension the required five (5) foot wide access aisle measured from the front of the seventy-two (72) inch long bicycle parking space in Phase 1 and 2. DS 2-09.5.1, DS2-09.5.2, DS 2-09.5.4, & DS 2-09.6.2 6. Boundary line between the CUZ-1 and CUZ-2; and NCD-65 and NCD-75 could not be found on the development plan. Please provide. 7. Previous comment: The entire site is within the AEZ Airport Hazard District (AHD). No structure, use of land, or tree may exceed the height limitations by the Airport Hazard Districts within the Airport Environs Zone (AEZ). Refer to official maps established. Certain uses are prohibited from these districts as noted below and as determined by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). The height limits around Tucson International Airport are based on distances away from established ends of runways. Where two (2) or more height restrictions are placed on a parcel, the more restrictive height limit prevails. Height limit exceptions noted in Sec. 3.2.7.3 do not apply within the Airport Environs Zone (AEZ). LUC 2.8.5.11 Please add to the development plan the elevation of the highest point of the buildings or landscaping. This cannot exceed the end of runway elevation. 8. Please provide the maximum allowed FAR (0.90) and provided FAR as a separate note. LUC 3.2.3.2.B 9. A copy of provide documentation of right-of-way dedication as required by rezoning condition 2 will be provided prior to approval of the development plan. C9-06-10 Condition 2 10. Per rezoning condition 4 please provide copy of recorded airport disclosure statement. The statement must also be included as a note on the development plan. The development plan cannot be approved until provided. C9-06-10 Condition 4 11. Per rezoning condition crosswalks leading to the west and south as noted but there does not appear to be any openings within the proposed masonry walls to allow access into the neighborhoods. Please provide. C9-06-10 Condition 5 12. Please add note that mail is to be delivered to an area within a building please state so on the plan. DS 2-05.2.4.V 13. Please indicate how many of the provided accessible parking spaces are van accessible. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call David Rivera, (520) 791-5608. KAA S:\zoning review\karol\planning\cdrc\developmentplan\D07-0030dpr.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development plan and additional requested documents. |
| 11/23/2007 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: D07-0030 CIRCLE K STORE/REVISED DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE: 11/20/07 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: 1.) Correct 138-16-601F to 138-16-001F on sheet 1. 2.) Add: A development of a portion of Lots 1 and 6 of Golden Dawn Farms, Bk. 4, Pg. 98 to Title Block Legal Description. es |
| 11/27/2007 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. All lettering and dimensions shall be the equivalent of twelve (0.12") point or greater in size. Revise all sheets as necessary. DS 2-05.2.1.A 2. Add the rezoning case number (C9-06-10) to the lower right hand corner of all sheets. |
| 11/29/2007 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 12/03/2007 | JASON GREEN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: December 3, 2007 SUBJECT: Circle K Development Plan- 2nd Engineering Review TO: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager LOCATION: Parcel ID 138-16-001F, T15S R13E Sec13 Ward 1 REVIEWERS: Jason Green, CFM ACTIVITY: D07-0030 SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Development Services Department has received and reviewed the revised Development Plan, Drainage Statement (L.E.A.D.S., Inc., 28JUN07, revised 01NOV07) and Geotechnical Investigation Report (Forsee & Vann, Inc., 14SEP07). Engineering Division does not recommend approval of the Development Plan at this time. The Drainage Statement was reviewed for Development Plan purposes only. The following items need to be addressed: DRAINAGE STATEMENT: 1) The results of the required 30-foot-deep boring (DS Sec.10-02.14.2.6) should be examined to determine possible causes of slow infiltration or engineering measures needed to ensure infiltration. Threshold retention requirements may be waived in certain cases when stormwater retention is not feasible due to constraints imposed by subsurface conditions. In such cases detention criteria may be imposed in lieu of threshold retention requirements. The submitted geotechnical report did not address the required 30-foot boring, the report submitted shows the deepest boring to 20-feet and does not address Auger refusal at that depth and why the 30-foot boring was not tested. 2) Dry wells are highly discouraged due to substantial drywell failure within the City of Tucson. Floodplain Ordinance Tucson Code Section 26-10(c) states: The design of a detention or retention system, as reviewed and approved by the city engineer, shall include consideration of the degree of existing development within the basin and the capacity of the downstream drainage facilities. The systems will be designed with strict conformance to the public's health, safety and welfare. The effects of recharging storm runoff and possible pollution of the groundwater shall be evaluated for all systems employing infiltration systems, such as dry wells, in order to prevent contamination of the groundwater aquifer. Dry wells designed within gas stations do not satisfy a design that is in strict conformance with the public's health, safety or with a discussion or evidence on potential pollution of the groundwater aquifer. 3) Provide a geotechnical report that specifically assesses the proposed underground stormwater retention/detention system and dry wells beneath the pavement. The geotechnical report shall state whether the chambers are subject to collapsing or whether the pavement structure would be damaged from heavy traffic loads and provide a discussion on groundwater recharge for the proposed drywells. DEVELOPMENT PLAN: 4) DS Sec.2-03.2.3.C: The design for the intersection widening for Nogales Hwy and Valencia Road will be approved by the Engineering Division when the City of Tucson Department of Transportation gives their final approval of the development plan. Contact Tucson Department of Transportation, Jose Ortiz, for clarity. 5) DS Sec.2-05.2.3.C: Label the dimensioned r-o-w as the future or existing ½ r-o-w width for Valencia Road on the Development Plan. 6) DS Sec.2-05.2.3.C: Dimension from the centerline of Nogales Hwy the future curb and 6-foot sidewalk location to verify that there is room for this area when the future right-of-way and intersection widening is accounted for. 7) DS Sec.2-05.2.3.E: Provide the City of Tucson field book number and page with datum reference for the existing and proposed spot elevations and topography used on the Development Plan. If the City of Tucson Datum was taken off of a ALTA Survey by CEI Engineering Associates the field book number and page must still be referenced on the development plan and the survey should be provided. 8) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.D.3: Revise the Development Plan to correctly reflect the truncated domes locations at the handicap access ramps (see ANSI 705.5. for design criteria). Truncated Domes must be installed at the transition of the pedestrian circulation and vehicular use area. The development plan shows the truncated domes setback away from this transition in plan view, revise. Please refer to this standard and the figures provided for additional curb access ramps requirements. 9) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.E: Revise the Development Plan to show all right-of-way dedications, specifically the intersection widening. Label both Valencia Road and Nogales Hwy as an MS&R. Per the rezoning condition #2 please provide documentation of right-of-way dedication. 10) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.H: Dry wells are highly discouraged due to substantial drywell failure within the City of Tucson. Revise the Drainage Statement to include discussion on all requirements within DS 10-01.3.5.5 and 10-02.14.5 (1-10) for all systems, which utilize a method of subsurface disposal, i.e. dry wells and underground storage chambers. The Drainage Statement must meet or exceed the minimum criteria within both Development Standards and within the ADEQ Type 2.04 General Permit for drywells that drain areas at motor fuel dispensing facilities where motor fuels are used, stored or loaded. 11) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.K: Revise the development plan to label and dimension the minimum distance of 5-feet for the pedestrian refuge that connects the proposed buildings to Valencia Road. 12) DS Sec.2-08.4.1.A: Revise the pedestrian circulation from Nogales Hwy. It appears that the pedestrian circulation from Nogales Highway to the proposed building will be done during Phase 2. The access must be provided within Phase 1 construction to meet the requirement of DS 2-08.4.1.A incase Phase 2 is never built out. 13) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.T: Verify that the Trash Enclosure Detail on Sheet C-4 meets the minimum standards in DS Sec.6-01. Provide the minimum refuse enclosure requirements per DS Sec.6-01, Figure 3, for the required refuse enclosure dimensions and construction, refer to Environmental Services for further clarity. 14) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.U: Indicate graphically, where possible, and by notes, in all other instances, compliance with conditions of rezoning, specifically for engineering: a) Rezoning Condition # 2- The owner/developer shall dedicate the applicable r-o-w along Valencia Road and Nogales Hwy street frontage including applicable intersection widening. b) Rezoning Condition # 3- The owner/developer shall dedicate a 30-foot radius spandrel at the northeast corner of the site prior to development plan approval. Label and dimension the 30-foot radius on the plan. c) Rezoning Condition # 7- Prior to Development Plan approval, the Department of Transportation shall review the project for compliance with future Regional Transportation Authority limited Parkway requirements as it applies to Valencia Road. This approval is required prior to development plan approval. d) Rezoning Condition # 10- The owner/developer shall construct a bus pull-out/pull-through and a bus shelter on the Old Tucson-Nogales Hwy (US 89) as determined by the Department of Transportation. Provide approval for the proposed bus shelter shown on the Development Plan. e) Rezoning Condition # 16- The owner/developer shall provide for signal improvements at the intersection of Valencia Road and Nogales Hwy not to exceed $25,000. This must be done prior to Development Plan approval, contact Thomas Weiderman at 837-6617 for further clarification. 15) A private improvement agreement (PIA) is required for the proposed work within the public right-of-way. An approved site plan is required prior to applying for a PIA. Contact the PIA Coordinator for additional PIA information at 791-5550 ext. 1107. 16) Review and approval from TDOT Permits and Codes for all improvements within the public right-of-way will be required. A right-of-way use permit application will be required prior to construction. Refer to the following links for TDOT Forms and applications: a) http://www.tucsonaz.gov/dsd/Forms_Fees___Maps/Applications/applications.html / b) http://www.dot.ci.tucson.az.us/engineering/pia.php c) Or contact Thad Harveston at 741-3115 for all additional questions regarding r-o-w. GEOTECHNICAL REPORT: 17) DS Sec.10-02.14.2.6: A revised geotechnical evaluation needs to be submitted for review, addressing the following: a) Soils report should provide conformance with DS section 10-02.14.2.6 regarding 30-foot boring for the proposed retention systems, the report submitted shows the deepest boring to 20-feet, which does not address the required 30-foot. b) Provide infiltration rates for the underground detention/retention design. If underground stormwater chambers and dry wells are proposed for the retention requirements a pre- and post percolation test will be required to assure that the system drains within the required time limit of 12-hours. A discussion on groundwater recharge is required due to the proposed dry wells. 18) Provide a revised geotechnical report, or addendum, that specifically assesses the proposed underground stormwater retention/detention system with dry wells beneath the pavement. The geotechnical report shall state whether the chambers are subject to collapsing or whether the pavement structure would be damaged from heavy traffic loads. 19) Per Page 24 of the geotechnical report the percolation test results do not reflect an underground retention system. All percolation rates must be determined to meet the minimum requirements within DS Sec.10-01.3.5.5.3, Sec.10-01.3.5.5.4, DS Sec.10-02.14.5.8, and Sec.10-02.14.5.9. GRADING PLAN: 20) DS Sec.11-01.2.1: A grading permit will be required for this project. A grading plan and a grading permit application will be required after Development Plan approval and prior to any construction activity. A grading permit may not be issued prior to Development Plan approval. Subsequent comments may be necessary, depending upon the nature and extent of revisions that occur to the Development Plans 21) Please ensure that any future grading plan will be consistent with the Development Plan, Drainage Statement, and geotechnical report. Grading standards may be accessed at: http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/DevStandsTOC.pdf 22) Arizona Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (AZPDES) requirements are applicable to this project. Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans (SWPPP) and text addressing stormwater controls for all areas affected by construction activities related to this development will be required with a grading plan submittal. For further information, visit www.adeq.state.az.us/environ/water/permits/stormwater.html. 23) The SWPPP must meet or exceed the minimum criteria within the ADEQ Type 2.04 General Permit for drywells that drain areas at motor fuel dispensing facilities where motor fuels are used, stored or loaded. GENERAL COMMENTS: Please provide a revised Development Plan, a revised Drainage Statement, and a revised geotechnical report that address the comments provided above. Include a comprehensive response letter addressing in detail responses to all of the above comments. Further comments may be generated upon resubmittal of the Development Plan, Drainage Statement, and geotechnical report reviews. For any questions, or to schedule a meeting call me at 837-4929. Jason Green, CFM Senior Engineer Associate Engineering Division Development Services |
| 12/06/2007 | FRODRIG2 | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Denied | >>> Jim Stoyanoff 12/06/2007 9:25 AM >>> If the Transportation Dept determines any additional right of way is needed for turn lanes, bus pull out or any other transportation need, please submit the legal description with a sketch of the requested area to the Real Estate Division. Also, please include a title report dated within 30 days for the subject development. |
| 12/06/2007 | JOSE ORTIZ | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Denied | December 6, 2007 ACTIVITY NUMBER: D07-0030 PROJECT NAME: Circle K Store PROJECT ADDRESS: Valencia /Nogales SWC PROJECT REVIEWER: Jose E. Ortiz PE, Traffic Engineer Resubmittal Required: Traffic Engineering does not recommend approval of the Development Plan; therefore a revised Development Plan is required for re-submittal. The following items must be revised or added to the development plan. 1. Include a response letter with the next submittal that states how all comments have been addressed. 2. Additional right-of-way will need to be dedicated to accommodate the proposed bus shelter location along the West Side of Alvernon Road. Illustrate on the plans the additional right of way to be dedicated and coordinate these efforts with Real Estate. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-4259 x76730 or Jose.Ortiz@tucsonaz.gov |
| 12/10/2007 | ANDY VERA | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Move gate post to face of enclosure wall and allow a minimum 12 ft gate opening. Please correct on resubmittal. If you have any questions you may contact Andy Vera at (520) 791-5543 ext 1212 or e-mail: Andy.Vera@tucsonaz.gov |
| 12/11/2007 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Denied | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN COMMENTS Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT D07-0030 Circle K Store ( ) Tentative Plat (X) Development Plan (X) Landscape Plan ( ) Revised Plan/Plat ( ) Board of Adjustment ( ) Other CROSS REFERENCE: C9-06-10 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: 12th -Valencia Rd Area Plan GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: Yes COMMENTS DUE BY: December 7, 2007 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: ( ) No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment ( ) Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions ( ) RCP Proposal Complies with Plan Policies (X) See Additional Comments Attached ( ) No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: (X) Resubmittal Required: ( ) Tentative Plat (X) Development Plan (X) Landscape Plan ( ) Other REVIEWER: msp 791-4505 DATE: December 5, 2007 Department of Urban Planning and Design comments D07-0030 Circle K Store: Development Plan December 5, 2007 The following requests/comments by staff are a carry over from last review because these have not been addressed adequately, they are: 1. Please revise development plan and include as a general note the required documentation as outlined on rezoning case C9-0 6-10, condition # 4. Although the resubmittal letter from LEADS + CEI, dated November 5, 2007, indicates this request has been added to the DP, it has not been listed as a new general note on the DP. New note shall include the recordation information (docket & page) of this document. This is a requirement prior to DP approval. 2. As a requirement of compliance on rezoning case C9-06-10, condition # 9, please provide building four sided building elevations for "Building A." The sides and rear elevations of "Building A" will remain visible from both Valencia Road and the Nogales Highway until such time as Phase II and III are built out and until then, "Building A" will remain highly visible from all angles. Prior to DP approval Planning staff shall review for compliance of rezoning condition # 9, which requires the integrity of architectural design elements to be applied to all four-sides of the proposed building(s). Letter from LEADS + CEI, dated November 5, 2007, indicates this request will be submitted separately to the Planning Department for review. Planning staff is unable to approve DP until this review is completed. DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN COMMENTS Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT D07-0030 Circle K Store 08/09/07 ( ) Tentative Plat (X) Development Plan (X) Landscape Plan ( ) Revised Plan/Plat ( ) Board of Adjustment ( ) Other CROSS REFERENCE: C9-06-10 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: 12th -Valencia Rd Area Plan GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: Yes COMMENTS DUE BY: August 2, 2007 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: ( ) No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment ( ) Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions ( ) RCP Proposal Complies with Plan Policies (X) See Additional Comments Attached ( ) No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: (X) Resubmittal Required: ( ) Tentative Plat (X) Development Plan (X) Landscape Plan ( ) Other REVIEWER: msp 791-4505 DATE: August 2, 2007 Department of Urban Planning and Design comments D07-0030 Circle K Store: Development Plan August 2, 2007 3. Please revise development plan to include as part of the general notes/rezoning notes, rezoning case C9-06-10. List all rezoning conditions (1 through 24), write the conditions verbatim as approved by Mayor and Council. 4. Please revise development plan and include as a general note the required documentation as outlined on rezoning case C9-0 6-10, condition # 4. 5. Please revise development plan to provide on-site parking access lanes (PAALS) and the on-site pedestrian circulation system to meet rezoning case C9-06-10, condition # 5. 6. Please revise development plant to show future on-site access points for PAALs and for on-site pedestrian circulation between phase I, phase II, and phase III development. 7. As a requirement of compliance on rezoning case C9-06-10, condition # 9, please provide building four sided building elevations for "Building A." The sides and rear elevations of "Building A" will remain visible from both Valencia Road and the Nogales Highway until such time as Phase II and III are built out and until then, "Building A" will remain highly visible from all angles. |
| 12/12/2007 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES December 12, 2007 Hank Hulbert LEADS, Inc. 2400 North Central Avenue, Suite 203 Phoenix , Arizona 85004 Subject: D07-0030 Circle K Store Development Plan Dear Hank: Your submittal of November 7, 2007 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 10 Copies Revised Development Plan (Zoning, Landscape, Addressing, Traffic, Wastewater, Real Estate, ESD, DUPD, Engineering, DSD) 5 Copies Revised Landscape Plan (Zoning, Landscape, DUPD, Engineering, DSD) 2 Copies Revised Drainage Statement (Engineering, DSD) 2 Copies Revised Geotechnical Report (Engineering, DSD) 3 Copies Color Elevations (DUPD, Zoning, DSD) 2 Copies ROW dedication paperwork and Airport Disclosure Statement (Zoning, DSD) 2 Copies Title Report (Real Estate, DSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4919. Sincerely, Patricia Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: (602) 254-1700 |