Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - DEV PLAN
Permit Number - D07-0029
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - DEV PLAN
Review Status: Completed
Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
01/02/2008 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Approved | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: David Rivera Principal Planner PROJECT: D07-0029 El Con Pad 6 Development Plan TRANSMITTAL DATE: January 2, 2008 DUE DATE: January 22, 2008 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. The Zoning Review Section approves the development plan for this project. However, should there be any changes requested by other CDRC members, the Zoning Review Section approval is void, and we request copies of the revised development plan to verify that those changes do not affect any zoning requirements. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call David Rivera, (520) 791-5608. C:\planning\cdrc\developmentplan\D070029dpa.doc |
01/17/2008 | ANDY VERA | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | 1. Trash enclosure detail does not accurately dimension measurements or the four rear wall protectors/bollards as exist and required. Correct to depict as follows: A. If using 6 inch bollards with the 2 inch separation from side wall, as indicated, then the inside clear measurement is 18 ft 8 in. not 18' 2". Inside wall to wall dimension is 20 ft. B. Outside enclosure width dimension should depict 21 ft 4 in. C. Outside enclosure length/depth = 10 ft. 8 in. to existing face of CMU wall. 13 ft. 2 in. to gate post plus whatever post dimension is for complete outside dimension. D. Inside clear dimension from rear bollard to front enclosure gates as shown should depict 11 ft. Please provide corrections as mentioned. If you have any questions you may contact Andy Vera at (520) 791-5543 ext 1212 or e-mail: Andy.Vera@tucsonaz.gov |
01/22/2008 | BIANCA RAMIREZ | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | TO: Patricia Gehlen; CDRC Coordinator DATE: January 22, 2008 SUBJECT: Engineering review of the El Con Pad 6 Development Plan. The activity number is D07-0029. SUMMARY: The Development Plan has been reviewed by the Engineering Department. The Enigineering Department does not recommend approval of the Development Plan at this time. The following must be addressed prior to approval. RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: DEVELOPMENT PLAN, The next submittal must address the following items: DEVELOPMENT PLAN 1. On sheet SP1.3 indicate if the 60' ½ ROW is existing, future or coincident. Label the ROW dimension accordingly. DS 2-02.2.3.C. Provide both existing and future ROW dimensions. Per paving plans existing ROW appears to be different than depicted. Verify that dimensions area accuratly reflected on developmen plan. The above comment is from the first review. The revisions show only the existing ROW dimension and shows a leader arrow to call out the existing/future curb location. It must be clear on the plan if the existing ROW dimension is also the future ROW dimension. To reiterate it must be clearly indicated on the plan if Broadway Blvd in this specific location is built out to the future ROW per the Major Streets and Route Plan. After researching the Department of Transportation Map Site it appears Broadway Blvd in this area is not built out to the future ROW. Verify and correct the plan appropriately. 2. Provide DSMR infomtion of development plan. 3. Complied 4. Complied 5. Provide appropriate text on sheet SP1.4 for Handicap Sign. Per TCC 20-222, provide a detail for the handicapped signage to be posted in front of the parking space, calling out a $518.00 fine. Contact me if you would like a copy of what the sign should look like. I would be happy to e-mail it. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 837-4928 or Bianca.Ramirez@tucsonaz.gov Bianca Ramirez Engineering Associate City of Tucson/Development Services Department 201 N. Stone Avenue P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210 (520) 837 - 4928 office (520) 879 - 8010 fax |
01/31/2008 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES January 31, 2008 Pattie Davis Psomas 800 East Wetmore Road, Suite 110 Tucson, Arizona 85719 Subject: D07-0029 El Con Pad 6 Development Plan Dear Pattie: The above referenced development plan has been CONDITIONALLY APPROVED by the Community Design Review Committee. Once the necessary corrections are made per on-line comments, please submit the following documents for sign-off. 1 Double Matte right-reading Océ or Photo Mylar of the COMPLETE SET of the Development Plan, Landscape Plan, and the Native Plant Preservation Plan (if part of the original submittal). AND 1 Double Matte right-reading Océ or Photo Mylar of the Development Plan. AND 1 CD that contains all of the drainage/hydrology and other reports submitted for the review and approval of this plan. The extra Double Matte right-reading Océ or Photo Mylar that you submit will be delivered to Pima County for permanent recording. Additional blackline copies will be made from the complete mylar set and distributed to various review agencies for their files. These copies will be ordered from the City's contracted print company and billed to you unless you already have an account at another printing company. Please let us know which printing company you would prefer to use and list them on your attached transmittal form when submitting your mylars to the CDRC office for sign-off approval. Your printing company will deliver the mylar and two (2) blackline copies to your office. If you are out of town you will need to contact the printing company for pick up or mailing arrangement options. TO ENSURE A MORE RAPID REVIEW OF THE MYLARS, PLEASE HAVE THE CITY OF TUCSON APPROVAL STAMP PLACED ON EACH SHEET OF THE SUBMITTAL SET, PREFERABLY IN THE LOWER RIGHT HAND CORNER NEAR THE TITLE BLOCK. THE STAMP IS LOCATED AT http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/CDRC Rezoning/CDRC/CDRC Stamp/cdrc stamp.htm THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN MYLARS MUST BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY ESD PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL TO THE CDRC OFFICE. APPROVAL MUST BE IN WRITING (E-MAIL IS OKAY). Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4919. Sincerely, Patricia Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 292-1290 |
01/31/2008 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Approved | per e-mail with John Beal |
12/20/2007 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed |