Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - DEV PLAN
Permit Number - D07-0029
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - DEV PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10/16/2007 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 10/23/2007 | FRODRIG2 | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Approv-Cond | October 23, 2007 To: Pattie Davis Psomas Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department ___________________________ From: Tom Porter, Sr. CEA (520-740-6579), representing the Pima County Departments of Wastewater Management and Environment Quality Subject: El Con Mall Dev. Plan – 2nd Submittal D07-029 The proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. Sheet SP1.4: The MH 7169-07 should be marked as public. Subject to the above, the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality and Wastewater Management Department hereby approve the above referenced submittal of the development plan. The required revision(s) may be shown on the Mylars. Please note the following: Approval of the above referenced submittal does not authorize the construction of public or private sewer collection lines, or water distribution lines. Prior to the construction of such features, a Construction Authorization (Approval To Construct) may need to be obtained from the Pima County Environmental Quality. Also, air quality activity permits must be secured by the developer or prime contractor from the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality before constructing, operating or engaging in an activity which may cause or contribute to air pollution. If you have any questions regarding the above-mentioned comments, please contact me. |
| 10/25/2007 | KAROL ARAGONEZ | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Karol Aragonez Planner PROJECT: D07-0029 El Con Pad 6 Development Plan Resubmittal TRANSMITTAL DATE: October 24, 2007 DUE DATE: November 14, 2007 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. Previous Comment: Please provide location of pedestrian connection/path to the main buildings of the El Con Mall from Pad 6. Per DS 2-08.3.1 a pedestrian connection is required to all areas within the development such as buildings, all bicycle and vehicle use areas, and all other common use areas. This path shall be an accessible route as well. The use of pedestrian paths within the rights-of-way does not count toward on-site pedestrian connection/circulation as defined by DS 2-08.3.1. If a connection cannot be made on site then a DSMR will be required to modify this requirement. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call David Rivera, (520) 791-5608. KAA S:\zoning review\karol\planning\cdrc\developmentplan\D07-0029dpr.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development plan and additional requested documents. |
| 11/02/2007 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Approved | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN COMMENTS Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT D07-0029 El Con Pad 6 11/01/07 ( ) Tentative Plat ( X ) Development Plan ( X ) Landscape Plan ( ) Revised Plan/Plat ( ) Board of Adjustment ( ) Other CROSS REFERENCE: C9-56-01, C9-74-32, C9-88-12 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Alvernon-Broadway GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: Gateway COMMENTS DUE BY: November 14, 2007 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: ( ) No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment ( ) Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions ( ) RCP Proposal Complies with Plan Policies ( ) See Additional Comments Attached ( X ) Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: 7/26/07 ( ) Resubmittal Required: ( ) Tentative Plat ( ) Development Plan ( ) Landscape Plan ( ) Architectural Self-Certification Letter/ Elevations REVIEWER: JBeall 791-4505 DATE: 11/01/07 Comments 1) The applicant's response to staff and agency comments from the 2nd submittal also included the revised drawings for PAD 5 (Chick-Fil-A) of the El Con development. It should be noted that the revision to PAD 5 should include a copy of the architectural self-certification letter that states that the proposed revision to the development plan is still in continuity and consistency with the overall design and color theme that has been developed for the entire El Con Mall site. (Development Agreement VII); as well as provide an updated set of elevations for the second drive-thru window and new building footprint. DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN COMMENTS Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT D07-0029 El Con Pad 6 10/01/07 ( ) Tentative Plat ( X ) Development Plan ( X ) Landscape Plan ( ) Revised Plan/Plat ( ) Board of Adjustment ( ) Other CROSS REFERENCE: C9-56-01, C9-74-32, C9-88-12 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Alvernon-Broadway GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: Gateway COMMENTS DUE BY: SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: ( ) No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment ( ) Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions ( ) RCP Proposal Complies with Plan Policies ( ) See Additional Comments Attached ( X ) No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: 7/26/07 ( ) Resubmittal Required: ( ) Tentative Plat ( ) Development Plan ( ) Landscape Plan ( ) Architectural Self-Certification Letter/ Elevations REVIEWER: JBeall 791-4505 DATE: 9/17/07 DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN COMMENTS Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT D07-0029 El Con Pad 6 07/26/07 ( ) Tentative Plat ( X ) Development Plan ( X ) Landscape Plan ( ) Revised Plan/Plat ( ) Board of Adjustment ( ) Other CROSS REFERENCE: C9-56-01, C9-74-32, C9-88-12 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Alvernon-Broadway GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: Gateway COMMENTS DUE BY: July 26, 2007 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: ( ) No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment ( ) Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions ( ) RCP Proposal Complies with Plan Policies ( X ) See Additional Comments Attached ( ) No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: ( X ) Resubmittal Required: ( ) Tentative Plat ( ) Development Plan ( ) Landscape Plan ( X ) Architectural Self-Certification Letter/ Elevations REVIEWER: JBeall 791-4505 DATE: 7/26/07 Comments 1) Please provide a copy of the architectural self-certification letter that states that the proposed development provides for continuity and consistency with the overall design and color theme that has been developed for the entire El Con Mall site. (Development Agreement VII) 2) Please provide elevations, as a courtesy, which show that the proposed development architectural design is 5-sided, showing all facades are to be designed with attention to architectural character and detail comparable to front façade, as the proposed development is along a major gateway arterial and the development plan indicates that the rear of the proposed building will face a public right-of-way. |
| 11/03/2007 | PATRICIA GILBERT | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | TO: Patricia Gehlen; CDRC Coordinator DATE: November 3, 2007 SUBJECT: Engineering review of the El Con Pad 6 Development Plan. The activity number is D07-0029. SUMMARY: The Development Plan and Drainage Report were received by Engineering on October 17th, 2007. Engineering has reviewed the received items and does not recommend approval of the Development Plan or the Drainage Report. RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: DEVELOPMENT PLAN, APPROVED: DRAINAGE STATEMENT Please be advised an addendum to the drainage statement will be required if scupper calculations are required. The next submittal must address the following items: DEVELOPMENT PLAN 1. On sheet SP1.3 indicate if the 60' ½ ROW is existing, future or coincident. Label the ROW dimension accordingly. DS 2-02.2.3.C. The above comment is from the first review. The revisions show only the existing ROW dimension and shows a leader arrow to call out the existing/future curb location. It must be clear on the plan if the existing ROW dimension is also the future ROW dimension. To reiterate it must be clearly indicated on the plan if Broadway Blvd in this specific location is built out to the future ROW per the Major Streets and Route Plan. After researching the Department of Transportation Map Site it appears Broadway Blvd in this area is not built out to the future ROW. Verify and correct the plan appropriately. 2. Dimension the sidewalk areas surrounding the building. DS 2-08. The above comment is from the previous review. It is acknowledged dimensions have been provided for the sidewalk located on the south side of the building that leads to the sidewalk in the ROW. However it is not clear if sidewalk is provided from the front doors of the building to the sidewalk in the ROW. Sidewalk is not provided between the loading space and building and the retention basin and building. Please clearly indicate on the plan (sheet SP1.3) pedestrian circulation with at minimum a 4' sidewalk surrounding the building. 3. Provide the location of accessible pedestrian connection/path to the main buildings of the El Con Mall from Pad 6. A pedestrian connection is required to all areas within the development such as buildings, all bicycle and vehicle use areas, and all other common use areas. DS 2-08.3.1 4. Show the direction of drainage on the roof and provide the location of roof down spouts. If downspout locations cross pedestrian circulation areas provide calculations in the drainage report and on the plan a detail for scupper sizing to show that the 10-year flow is contained under the sidewalk. The above comment is from the previous review. It is acknowledged the response letter indicates the roof downspouts are on the west and east side of the building however it must be clear on the plan (sheet SP1.3). It is not clear where the downspouts are located. Indicate on the plan (sheet SP1.3) the location of the downspouts via keynote, leader call out, etc. Be advised if a sidewalk is provided in either location scuppers may be required. |
| 11/21/2007 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES November 21, 2007 Pattie Davis Psomas 800 East Wetmore Road, Suite 110 Tucson, Arizona 85719 Subject: D07-0029 El Con Pad 6 Development Plan Dear Pattie: Your submittal of October 17, 2007 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 4 Copies Revised Development Plan (Zoning, Engineering, ESD, DSD) 3 Copies Revised Landscape Plan (Zoning, Engineering, DSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4919. Sincerely, Patricia Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 292-1290 dp-resubmittal |
| 11/21/2007 | ANDY VERA | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | 1. SP1.4, Dumpster detail as shown works for single enclosure type. However, existing enclosure on site is a double wide that can accomodate for one refuse and recycle dumpster. It is highly recommended to retain existing double wide enclosure and add appropriate side wall protection and provide a 10 ft x 10 ft inside clear service area for each dumpster between the wall protection and the front gates. Enclosure detail design must include proper dimensions for double enclosure type. 2. Recommend installing a post in front of the enclosure on each side and attach the gate doors to the post. Also, gate doors be constructed of a minimum standard "3 in. x 3 in. x 1/4 in. thick welded steel angle iron with a type B metal deck", for better durability than the proposed wood deck. Please provide corrections on resubmittal. If you have any questions you may contact Andy Vera at (520) 791-5543 ext 1212 or e-mail: Andy.Vera@tucsonaz.gov |