Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Permit Number - D07-0029
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06/27/2007 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 06/29/2007 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | >>> FireDSC FireDSC 06/29/2007 9:31 AM >>> Fire has approved D07-0029, Pad 6 at El Con. |
| 07/09/2007 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | 4350 E. Irvington Road, Tucson, AZ 85714 Post Office Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702 WR#184075 July 9, 2007 PSOMAS Attn: Pattie Davis 800 E Wetmore Rd, Suite 110 Tucson, Arizona 85719 Dear Ms. Davis: SUBJECT: El Con Pad 6 D07-0029 Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the development plan submitted June 28, 2007. It appears that there are no conflicts with the existing facilities within the boundaries of this proposed development. TEP will need a full set of approved site, electrical load, paving off-site improvements and irrigation plans. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. Any relocation costs will be billable to the customer. In order to apply for electric service, call the New Construction Department at (520) 918-8300. Submit a final set of plans including approved site, offsite and electrical load plans. Include a CD with the AutoCAD version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Your final plans should be sent to: Tucson Electric Power Company Attn: Ms. Mary Boice New Business Project Manager P. O. Box 711 (DB-101) Tucson, AZ 85702 520-917-8732 Please call the area Designer Mike Kaiser at (520) 918-8244, should you have any questions. Sincerely, Elizabeth Miranda Office Support Specialist Design/Build lm Enclosures cc: DSD_CDRC@tucsonaz.gov, City of Tucson (email) M. Kaiser, Tucson Electric Power |
| 07/13/2007 | TIM ROWE | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | July 13, 2007 To: Pattie Davis Psomas Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department ___________________________ From: Tom Porter, Sr. CEA (520-740-6579), representing the Pima County Departments of Wastewater Management and Environment Quality Subject: El Con Mall Dev. Plan - 1st Submittal D07-029 The proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. 1. Obtain a letter from the PCWMD's Development Services Section, written within the past 90 days, stating that treatment and conveyance system capacity for the project is available in the downstream public sewerage system and provide a copy of that letter to this office. The required form to request such a letter may be found at: http://www.pima.gov/wwm/forms/docs/CapResponseRequest.pdf. The development plan for this project cannot be approved until a copy of this letter has been received by this office. 2. All Sheets: Show the jurisdiction's case number, D07-029, in or near the title block of each sheet. This case number should be shown larger and bolder than any associated cross-reference numbers. 3. Sheet SPT.1A: Add a General Note that states: THIS PROJECT WILL HAVE ______ EXISTING AND______ PROPOSED WASTEWATER FIXTURE UNIT EQUIVALENTS PER TABLE 13.20.045(E)(1) IN PIMA COUNTY CODE 13.20.045(E). And fill in the blanks with the appropriate values. 4. Sheet SP1.1A: Add a General Note that states: THE ON-SITE SEWERS ARE EXISTING AND PRIVATE. NO NEW SEWERS ARE PROPOSED. 5. Sheet SP1.3: Show the size of private sewer line and include sewer directional flow arrows. 6. Sheet SP1.3: Mark the sewer lines on site as private. Also mark the section of pipe running to the proposed building as private BCS and show the pipe size/length/slope. 7. Sheet SP1.3: Include the rim and invert elevations for the manholes shown on property. Also mark the manholes as private. 8. Sheet SP1.4: The sewer line section running north of MH 7169-07 should be marked as private. This office will require a revised set of bluelines, and a response letter, addressing these comments. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. Pima County Code Title 13.20.030.A.2 requires that a wastewater review fee be paid for each submittal of the development plan. The fee for the first submittal is $166 plus $50 per sheet. For the second submittal, the review fee is $50 per sheet. For all subsequent submittals, the review fee is $39 per sheet. The next submittal of this project will be the second (2nd) submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $150.00 (made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER) must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. If you have any questions regarding the above-mentioned comments, please contact me. |
| 07/17/2007 | KAROL ARAGONEZ | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Karol Aragonez Planner PROJECT: D07-0029 El Con Pad 6 Development Plan TRANSMITTAL DATE: July 12, 2007 DUE DATE: July 26, 2007 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is June 27, 2008. 2. Case number D07-0029 has been assigned to this development plan (DP). Please place this number in the right corner of all sheets of the development plan, landscape plan, NPPO, and any other associated sheets. DS 2-05.2.2.B.2 3. Please draw all existing easements on the plan along with recordation information, location, width, and purpose. If an easement is no longer in use and scheduled to be vacated or has been abandoned, so indicate. If none exist provide response to reviewer's comments. Also if easements are purposed please draw, dimension and label as to their purpose and whether they will be public or private. If none exist provide response to reviewer's comments. DS 2-05.2.3.B & DS 2-05.2.4.G 4. Please add the proposed building height to the building footprints. DS 2-05.2.4.N 5. Please verify that the FAR calculations (C-1) have been revised to reflect what is proposed. 6. The square footage provided on SPT.1 and SP1.2 (6,550 sq. ft.), SP1.3 (6501 sq. ft.), and on L1 (6587 sq. ft.) do not match. Please decide on the correct square footage for pad 6 and change plan according. If change alters parking calculations then revise as well. 7. Please dimension sidewalk areas north, south and west abutting building. 8. Please provide location of pedestrian connection/path to the main buildings of the El Con Mall from Pad 6. Per DS 2-08.3.1 a pedestrian connection is required to all areas within the development such as buildings, all bicycle and vehicle use areas, and all other common use areas. This path shall be an accessible route as well. 9. Please show all awnings along the south side of proposed building as indicated on elevations submitted by the architect on the development plan. Provide dimensions from the awning overhang to the existing/future curb location. Along street property lines roof overhangs or open structures may extend two (2) feet into the required perimeter yard. LUC 3.2.6.6.B.1 10. Per DS 2-08.4.1.B a sidewalk will be provided adjacent and parallel to any PAAL on the side where buildings are located. This would require the sidewalk to be extended along the west side of the proposed building. Please provide. 11. Bicycle parking provided on the DP does not meet the requirements of revised DS (Development Standard) 2-09. Per DS 2-09.4.1 Class 2 bicycle parking facilities will be located no more than fifty (50) feet from the main building entrance(s) and will be along the front side of the building as well as along other sides of the building that has an entrance. Bicycle access through the development will be separate from the pedestrian ways. Vehicular access may be used as bicycle access. Bicycle access to a parking facility may cross a pedestrian way at a right angle (DS2-09.3.2). 12. Please provide a detail of the proposed class 2 bicycle parking spaces. Single rack spaces placed in a row will allow a minimum of seventy-two (72) inch lengths per bicycle parking space and a minimum of thirty (30) inches between spaces of racks. A five (5) foot wide access aisle measured from the front or rear of the seventy-two (72) inch long parking space will be provided beside each row. Lighting will be provided such that all facilities are thoroughly illuminated and visible from adjacent sidewalks, parking lots, or buildings, during working hours. The surface of the facility can be surfaced the same as for motor vehicle parking or with a minimum of one (1) inch thickness of one-fourth (1/4) inch aggregate material. DS 2-09.5.1, DS2-09.5.2, DS 2-09.5.4, & DS 2-09.6.2 13. Please provide a detail of accessible ramp from the access aisle. Curb ramps shall be a minimum of three (3) feet in width, exclusive of flared sides. The curb ramp flares shall not be steeper than 1:10. Counter slopes of adjoining gutters and road surfaces immediately adjacent to the curb ramp shall not be steeper than 1:20. The adjacent surfaces at transitions at curb ramps to walks, gutters and streets shall be at the same level. All slopes are to be indicated on the plan/plat and associated details. ANSI 406.2, 3, & 4 14. Please add truncated domes to keynote 9 on sheet SP1.3. ANSI 406.12, ANSI 705 15. Please indicate the location and type of postal service to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements. If mail is to be delivered to an area within a building please state so on the plan. DS 2-05.2.4.V If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Karol Aragonez, (520) 791-5550, ext. 74960. KAA S:\zoning review\karol\planning\cdrc\developmentplan\D07-0029dp.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development plan and additional requested documents. |
| 07/23/2007 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | Revise to match any revisions made to the development plan. An additional submittal is required. DS 2-07.2.2 |
| 07/24/2007 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Approved | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: D07-0029 EL CON PAD 6/DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE: July 24, 2007 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and we hereby approve this project. APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITION: 1.) DELETE ADDRESS : 3485 E BROADWAY BL ON SHEET 1 OF MYLAR NOTE: 1.) Submit a 24 x 36 Reverse Reading Double Matte Photo Mylar of approved Development Plan to City Planning. Signed and dated Mylar will be forwarded to Pima County Addressing prior to assignment of addresses. 2.) All addresses will need to be displayed per Pima County Address Standards at the time of final inspection. jg |
| 07/27/2007 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Denied | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN COMMENTS Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT D07-0029 El Con Pad 6 07/26/07 ( ) Tentative Plat ( X ) Development Plan ( X ) Landscape Plan ( ) Revised Plan/Plat ( ) Board of Adjustment ( ) Other CROSS REFERENCE: C9-56-01, C9-74-32, C9-88-12 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Alvernon-Broadway GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: Gateway COMMENTS DUE BY: July 26, 2007 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: ( ) No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment ( ) Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions ( ) RCP Proposal Complies with Plan Policies ( X ) See Additional Comments Attached ( ) No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: ( X ) Resubmittal Required: ( ) Tentative Plat ( ) Development Plan ( ) Landscape Plan ( X ) Architectural Self-Certification Letter/ Elevations REVIEWER: JBeall 791-4505 DATE: 7/26/07 Comments 1) Please provide a copy of the architectural self-certification letter that states that the proposed development provides for continuity and consistency with the overall design and color theme that has been developed for the entire El Con Mall site. (Development Agreement VII) 2) Please provide elevations, as a courtesy, which show that the proposed development architectural design is 5-sided, showing all facades are to be designed with attention to architectural character and detail comparable to front façade, as the proposed development is along a major gateway arterial and the development plan indicates that the rear of the proposed building will face a public right-of-way. |
| 07/30/2007 | PATRICIA GILBERT | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | TO: Patricia Gehlen; CDRC Coordinator DATE: July 30, 2007 SUBJECT: Engineering review of the El Con Pad 6 Development Plan. The activity number is D07-0029. SUMMARY: The Development Plan and Drainage Report were received by Engineering on June 28th, 2007. Engineering has reviewed the received items and does not recommend approval of the Development Plan or the Drainage Report. RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: DEVELOPMENT PLAN, APPROVED: DRAINAGE STATEMENT Please be advised an addendum to the drainage statement will be required if scupper calculations are required. GENERAL COMMENTS 1. The Drainage Report was reviewed for Development Plan purposes only. 2. A Grading Plan and Permit could be required. 3. Proposed developments exceeding 1 acre of disturbance are subject to AzPDES requirements. 4. Proposed fills in excess of two feet above existing grade at any location in the outer one hundred feet of the developing site adjacent to residentially zoned property require the procedure outlined in Development Standards 11-01.8.1. This process must be complete prior to Grading Plan approval. The next submittal must address the following items: DEVELOPMENT PLAN 1. Provide the assigned activity number to the lower right hand corner of each sheet of the development plan package. DS 2-05.2.2. 2. Provide the following note per DS 2-05.2.2.D.2., "No structure or vegetation shall be located or maintained so as to interfere with the sight visibility triangles in accordance with Development Standard 3-01.0." 3. Indicate if the 60' ½ ROW is existing, future or coincident. Label the ROW dimension accordingly. DS 2-02.2.3.C. 4. Include on the development plan estimated cut and fill quantities. If cut and fill quantities equal zero, please note on the plan. DS 2-02.2.1.A.17. 5. Dimension the sidewalk areas surrounding the building. DS 2-08. 6. Provide the location of accessible pedestrian connection/path to the main buildings of the El Con Mall from Pad 6. A pedestrian connection is required to all areas within the development such as buildings, all bicycle and vehicle use areas, and all other common use areas. DS 2-08.3.1 7. Indicate on sheet SP1.3, in keynote 9, that truncated domes will be utilized. 8. Handicap curb access ramps are required to be constructed with truncated domes, per recent a Federal ADA requirement. Show a detail to the plan indicating all public and private handicap curb access ramps will have truncated domes. 9. Show solid waste provisions for Pad 6. Refer to Development Standard 6-01 for commercial provisions. 10. Show the direction of drainage on the roof and provide the location of roof down spouts. If downspout locations cross pedestrian circulation areas provide calculations in the drainage report and on the plan a detail for scupper sizing to show that the 10-year flow is contained under the sidewalk. |
| 07/31/2007 | JOSE ORTIZ | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | |
| 08/01/2007 | ANDY VERA | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Denied | 1. The existing enclosure on site does not currently meet with code. A. The refuse enclosure will require gates per DS 6-01.4.2.B. Gates must be equipped with the ability to be secured in the open position during service and when closed. DS 6-01.4.2.C.4. Not provided. Recommend annotation " Positive locking with (bayonet) anchors, Qty - 4, 1"dia. x 6" long galavanized pipe flush with concrete". Demostrate on plan and provide detail of enclosure. B. Gates must be mounted to the face of the CMU wall or post so that they do not encroach within the required 20 ft inside clear service area (10 ft X 10 ft per dumpster within the wall protection and the front gates). DS 6-01.4.1.B. Do not design gates with a center post. C. Currently there is no side wall protection within the enclosure. Required per DS 6-01.4.2.C.2. Add side wall protection and position them at 6 inches to center. D. Recommend mounting gates so they open a minimum of 180 degrees and swing over the vertical curb so opening is not restricted less than 20ft. Please correct on resubmittal. |
| 08/02/2007 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES August 2, 2007 Pattie Davis Psomas 800 East Wetmore Road, Suite 110 Tucson, Arizona 85719 Subject: D07-0029 El Con Pad 6 Development Plan Dear Pattie: Your submittal of June 28, 2007 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 6 Copies Revised Development Plan (Wastewater, Zoning, DUPD, Engineering, ESD, DSD) 4 Copies Revised Landscape Plan (Zoning, Engineering, DUPD, DSD) 2 Copies Elevations and letter (DUPD, DSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4919. Sincerely, Patricia Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 292-1290 dp-resubmittal |