Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - DEV PLAN
Permit Number - D07-0028
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - DEV PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08/15/2007 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 08/20/2007 | CDRC1 | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | August 20, 2007 To: Ken Perry EEC Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department ___________________________ From: Tom Porter, Sr. CEA (520-740-6579), representing the Pima County Departments of Wastewater Management and Environment Quality Subject: Target Fulfillment Center West Dev. Plan - 2nd Submittal D07-028 The proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. 1. Obtain a letter from the PCWMD's Development Services Section, written within the past 90 days, stating that treatment and conveyance system capacity for the project is available in the downstream public sewerage system and provide a copy of that letter to this office. The required form to request such a letter may be found at: http://www.pima.gov/wwm/forms/docs/CapResponseRequest.pdf. The development plan for this project cannot be approved until a copy of this letter has been received by this office. 2nd Request. 2. Sheet 3,8,13 and 18: Show the off-site proposed public sewer line running along Rita Rd . All public sewer elements (manholes cleanouts, mains and easements), that are located on this project or are less than 100' from this project, are identified with IMS numbers, construction plan number and easement descriptions and recording information. The IMS numbers and construction plan numbers, are the sewer element identification numbers, that may be found on PCWMD Maps and Records (5th floor) basemaps or at PCWMD and PCDOT MapGuide internet websites.2nd request. The IMS #'s for the manholes are missing and also the rim and invert elevations. 3. Sheet 3, 8 and 13: Sewer directional flow arrows are missing on the sewer lines along Rita Rd. This office will require a revised set of bluelines, and a response letter, addressing these comments. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. Pima County Code Title 13.20.030.A.2 requires that a wastewater review fee be paid for each submittal of the development plan. The fee for the first submittal is $166 plus $50 per sheet. For the second submittal, the review fee is $50 per sheet. For all subsequent submittals, the review fee is $39 per sheet. The next submittal of this project will be the third(3rd) submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $78.00 (made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER) must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. If you have any questions regarding the above-mentioned comments, please contact me. |
| 08/21/2007 | PGEHLEN1 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Passed | |
| 08/22/2007 | ED ABRIGO | PIMA COUNTY | ASSESSOR | Approved | Office of the Pima County Assessor 115 N. Church Ave. Tucson, Arizona 85701 BILL STAPLES ASSESSOR TO: CDRC Office Subdivision Review City of Tucson (FAX# 791-5559) FROM: Rosanna Werner, Gis Cartographer Pima County Assessor's Office Mapping Department DATE: August 22, 2007 RE: Assessor's Review and Comments Regarding DEVELOPMENT PLAN: D007-0028 TARGET FULFILLMENT CENTER WEST * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * x Plat meets Assessor's Office requirements. _______ Plat does not meet Assessor's Office requirements. COMMENTS: THANK YOU FOR YOUR SUBMITTAL. ROSANNA WERNER |
| 08/23/2007 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Denied | D07-0028, EEC Drawings, 19 Sheets Fire protection items on all sheets should be coordinated with the R.A.S.K. drawings. Sheets 5 and 6 Hydrants should be adjacent to paved fire access lanes. They are still shown over 300 feet off the pavement. Sheet 7 Hydrant north of column lines 3 cannot be behind truck parking, see IFC Section 508.5.4. The hydrant is between the truck parking and basin and would have no access. Sheet 10 The hydrant that is on City water is missing from this area. The hydrant is shown on the R.A.S.K. drawings to allow the fire department to pump directly into the building system from Tucson Water. You could leave a Stortz connection on this hydrant to differentiate it from the other hydrants. Also see R.A.S.K. FP-3 for connection location. |
| 08/24/2007 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | 1) Revise the landscape plans to remove the PRA delineations except where the PRA units are to be preserved. The intent of DS 2-13.2.3. is to designate and document preserved PRA. 2) Revise Figure G of the ERR to eliminate the appraisal column. 3) Obtain approval from the Department of Transportation for all right-of-way improvements. Revise the landscape plans to include the following standard notes for landscaping in the public right-of-way: All planting and irrigation that is proposed within the ROW must receive a permit prior to construction. Plans should be submitted to the City of Tucson Permits and Code section at 201 N. Stone, 4th floor. Once the permit has been approved, the applicant must call for a "Blue Stake " prior to the required pre-construction meeting with the City Landscape Architect, and prior to starting any work. It is the property owner's responsibility to keep the Sight Visibility Triangles (SVT), and the pedestrian access area clear of vegetation at all times, per Land Use Code (LUC) section 3.7.2.9. Final plant locations must be in compliance with all utility setback requirements. The owner understands that if the City of Tucson Transportation Department or any utility company needs to work within the ROW in the landscaped area, plants and irrigation may be destroyed without replacement or repair. The property owner assumes full liability for this landscape and irrigation, and any damage to roadway, sidewalk and utilities within the public right-of-way. The only private irrigation equipment that is allowed within the ROW is polyethylene type tubing and emitters that are not under constant pressure. All other equipment except for the water meter must be on site. 4) Add the WASH Case # and date of approval on the Development plan. DS 2-05.2.2.B.10 5) Revise the ERR and landscape plans regarding the Hilaria mutica on the site. Mitigation for removal of this species is required and the plans should be revised to clarify how the proposed mitigation will result in development of a habitat comparable to the existing conditions. DS 2-13.2.A.4, 2-13.2.5.B.o, 2-13.2.5.B.3.A.1 |
| 08/27/2007 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Target Fulfillment Center West D07-0028 Development Plan (2nd Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: August 27, 2007 DUE DATE: August 29, 2007 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a separate response letter for zoning, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is June 25, 2008. 2. This comment was not fully addressed. The existing zoning is hard zoning not "CONDITIONAL". Remove the word "CONDITIONAL" from General Note 1. Zoning acknowledges an error in regards to the existing zoning. The proposed Lot 11's existing zoning is I1, please revise the existing zoning to include the I1. D.S. 2-05.2.2.B.1 General Note 1 should read "EXISTING ZONING IS I2 AND RX1". 3. This comment was not fully addressed, provide a separate letter demonstrating how the rezoning conditions have been complied with. D.S. 2-05.2.2.B.2 The "REZONING CONDITIONS (PER C9-00-23) listed on sheet 2 of 16 do not match the amended rezoning conditions, dated June 19, 2007. Revised the rezoning conditions. Provide a separate letter demonstrating how the rezoning conditions have been complied with. 4. D.S. 2-05.2.2.B.3 Add the "Subject to: Sec 3.5.10.1" to General Note 3. 5. Zoning acknowledges the work is in progress to abandon easements. All easement abandonment needs to be completed prior to approval of this tentative plat/development plan. D.S. 2-05.2.3.B Show all easements of record on the plan. There are numerous easements shown on S01-006 Rita 244 block plat that will need to be abandoned under a separate instrument. Provide documentation of the abandonment. 6. Zoning is unable to find the dimension to the curb along Rita Road on sheet 3, please clarify. D.S. 2-05.2.3.C Provide a dimension to the curb for Rita Road. 7. D.S. 2-05.2.4.G & D.S. 2-03.2.4.J Zoning acknowledges that easements are proposed. Label the proposed water easements shown on sheet 3 as either public or private. Zoning was unable to find the proposed 40' drainage easement and the proposed 10' PUE's on the plan, please clarify. D.S. 2-05.2.4.G If applicable show all proposed easements graphically on the plan and label as to their purposes and whether they will be public of private. 8. This comment has not been fully addressed. Provide details for the proposed curb access ramps. Also provide the location of the detectable warnings on these details. D.S. 2-05.2.4.K It is not clear how the disabled will gain access to the proposed building from the proposed street. Show all proposed curb access ramps on the plan. Detectable warnings (truncated domes) will be required at all curb access ramps. ICC/ANSI A117.1-2003 Sec. 406.13. Additional comments maybe forth coming. 9. Zoning acknowledges Detail K, Sheet 16 and Detail D, Sheet 17. It appears that the curb is flush with the asphalt along the entire length of the handicapped parking spaces. Show the required detectable warnings (truncated domes) at each access aisles on detail K. D.S. 2-05.2.4.K It is not clear how the disabled will gain access to the sidewalk from the disabled vehicle parking space access aisles located along the south side of the building. Demonstrate on the plan how this access will work. 10. This comment was not addressed. Show the sidewalk that will provide the routing mentioned in your response to this comment. D.S. 2-05.2.4.K A sidewalk is required from the parking area located near the northwest corner of the parcel to the building. 11. This comment was not fully addressed. Per the plans there are two additional structures on site, guard house & pump house. Provide as a note the square footage of the each proposed structure and the specific use proposed. D.S. 2-05.2.4.M Provide, as a note, the square footage of the each proposed structure and the specific use proposed. 12. Zoning acknowledges the loading zones shown on the tentative plat/development plan. For your information if the loading docks meet the minimum requirements for the 12'x55' loading spaces they can count for the loading spaces. D.S. 2-05.2.4.O Show all loading zones, fully dimensioned, and provide, as a note, the number of loading spaces required and the number provided. Per LUC Sec. 3.4.5.2 the dimensions for the required loading spaces for this project are twelve (12) feet by fifty-five (55) feet. Additional comments maybe forth coming. 13. This comment has not been fully addressed. The parking calculation is not clear on how many vehicle parking spaces are required and provided. The vehicle parking calculation does not include the ratio used. If the area called out as "TRAILER PARKING/STORAGE AREAS" on the tentative plat/development plan is to remain, then provide the square footage of the outdoor storage area in the vehicle parking calculation, see parking requirements, see LUC Sec 3.3.4 STORAGE USE GROUP, Commercial Storage. D.S. 2-05.2.4.P As a note, provide calculations for the number of vehicle parking spaces required (include the ratio used), and the number provided, including the number of spaces required and provided for the physically disabled. Per LUC Sec. 3.3.4 STORAGE USE GROUP, Commercial Storage, the square footage of the areas listed as "TRAILER PARKING/STORAGE AREAS" will need to be included in the parking calculation or re-designated as "STAGING AREAS". Additional comments maybe forth coming. 14. D.S. 2-05.2.4.P Detail K, Sheet 16 provide a dimension for the location of the wheel stop, see D.S. 3-05.2.3.C.2. 15. This comment was not fully addressed. The vehicle overhang must be shown and dimensioned on the plan. D.S. 2-05.2.4.P Curb stops maybe required for all parking spaces located along the north side of the large parking area once the sidewalk width is verified, see comment 19. If the sidewalk is 6'-6" or wider no curb stops are required and the vehicle overhang must be shown and dimensioned on the plan 16. This comment has not been fully addressed. Provide materials for lighting, dimensioned layout, specific type of rack and the number of bicycles it supports on the details. D.S. 2-05.2.4.Q Show, on the drawing, off-street bicycle parking locations. Provide a detail for both Class 1 & Class 2 bicycle parking which includes, materials for lighting and paving, type of security, dimensions, specific type of rack and the number of bicycles it supports. Additional comments maybe forth coming. 17. Zoning acknowledges the bicycle parking calculation. Until the number of provided vehicle parking spaces is clearly defined, see comment 13, zoning is unable to verify that the bicycle parking calculation is correct. It appears that the number of required Class 1 and Class 2 bicycle parking spaces has been reversed. Per LUC Sec 3.3.4 STORAGE USE GROUP, Commercial Storage, of the eight (8) percent required bicycle parking, ninety (90) percent is required to be Class 1. D.S. 2-09.2.2 defines Class 1 - Long Term bicycle parking as lockers. Per LUC Sec 3.3.4 STORAGE USE GROUP, Commercial Storage, of the eight (8) percent required bicycle parking, ten (10) percent is required to be Class 2. D.S. 2-09.2.3 defines Class 2 - Short Term bicycle parking as a facility which provides a stationary object to which an operator can lock the bicycle. Revise the calculation. D.S. 2-05.2.4.Q Provide, as a note, calculations on the number of bicycle spaces required and the number provided. 18. Zoning acknowledges the information provided in the response letter. Provide the information on the tentative plat/development plan. Demonstrate on the plan how this project complies with the requirements of LUC Sections, 2.8.5.8.C, 2.8.5.9 and 2.8.5.11. 19. D.S. 2-03.2.1.G.2 Provide the total number of lots in the title block. 20. D.S. 2-03.2.2.B.9 Revise General note 24 to read, "This subdivision is subject to Ordinance No. 9430 which established zoning in the Rita Road Annexation Area". 21. D.S. 2-03.2.4.D Clearly delineate the proposed zoning boundaries on the tentative plat/development plan. 22. Ensure that all changes to the development plan are reflected on the landscape plans. 23. Additional comments may be forth coming depending on how each comment has been addressed. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956. C:\planning\cdrc\developmentplan\D07-0028dp-2nd.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development plan and additional requested documents. |
| 08/28/2007 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Denied | ADOT has these comments on this submittal; * In traffic impact analysis, why was the Houghton road interchange not referenced in the report? * What is the development's impact on the operation of the ramps in the interchange? * Will there be any need for signalizing the ramps, if not now, when and who will be responsible for their installation? * A signal study may be required for the T.I. * Why has the I-10 corridor study been not referenced in any part for the report? The future foot print of the T.I. may affect the south end of the development. * ADOT is not in agreement of the number and location of the proposed driveways; they may be too close to the interchange and right in and right out should be considered on the minor drives. If you have any questions or comment I can be reached at 388-4226. Thank you. -------------------------------------------------------- Confidentiality and Nondisclosure Notice: This email transmission and any attachments are intended for use by the person(s)/entity(ies) named above and may contain confidential/privileged information. Any unauthorized use, disclosure or distribution is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by email, and delete or destroy all copies plus attachments. |
| 08/28/2007 | ANDY VERA | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 08/28/2007 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: D07-0028 TARGET FULFILLMENT CENTER WEST/REVISED DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE: 8/28/07 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: Title Block should read: Target Fulfillment Center West, Lots 1-12. A Replat of Rita 244, recorded in Book 55, Page 71. Delete direction from all street names. Spell out all suffixes for all street names on applicable sheets. Correct Rita Park Place North to Target Way on all applicable sheets. Delete N. Access Drive on Sheet 9. es |
| 08/28/2007 | FRODRIG2 | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Approv-Cond | >>> Jim Stoyanoff 08/28/2007 11:01 AM >>> Be sure that General Note No.# 35 of this development plan is placed on the Dedication Page of the Final plat under General Notes. |
| 08/29/2007 | GLYNDA ROTHWELL | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Denied | 4350 E. Irvington Road, Tucson, AZ 85714 Post Office Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702 WR#184029 August 29, 2007 Engineering & Environmental Consultants, Inc. Attn: Ken Perry 4625 E Ft. Lowell Road Tucson, Arizona 85712 Dear Mr. Perry: SUBJECT: Target Fulfillment Center West – Lots 1-7 D07-0028 Tucson Electric Power Company (TEP) has reviewed the plan submitted August 21, 2007. TEP is unable to approve the plan at this time. There are existing electrical facilities within the boundaries of this project that must be identified. In order for TEP to approve the plan the facilities and easements must be depicted on the plans. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facility map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. All costs associated with the relocation of the facilities in conflict will be billable to the developer. Please resubmit two revised bluelines to City of Tucson for TEP’s review. You may contact the area Designer, Steve Garcia, at 917-8739 should you have any questions. Sincerely, Henrietta Noriega Office Specialist hn Enclosure cc: DSD_CDRC@tucsonaz.gov, City of Tucson S. Garcia, Tucson Electric Power |
| 08/29/2007 | JOSE ORTIZ | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approv-Cond | August 29, 2007 ACTIVITY NUMBER: D07-0028 PROJECT NAME: Target Fullfillment Center PROJECT ADDRESS: 9047 S Rita Rd PROJECT REVIEWER: Jose E. Ortiz PE, Traffic Engineer Resubmittal Required: Traffic Engineering recommends a conditional approval of the Development Plan. The following items need to be addressed prior to final approval. The following items must be revised or added to the development plan. 1. Include a response letter with the next submittal that states how all comments have been addressed. 2. Some of the radii's on the proposed curb returns along Rita Road are not being called out, and other call outs are drafted incorrectly at the Rita Road/Rita Tech Place intersection. 3. Schematically illustrate the final configuration of the east leg of the Rita Road/Rita Tech Place interchange. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-4259 x76730 or Jose.Ortiz@tucsonaz.gov |
| 08/29/2007 | MATT FLICK | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 08/31/2007 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | DATE: August 31, 2007 TO: DSD_CDRC@ tucsonaz.gov FROM: Glenn Hicks Parks and Recreation 791-4873 ext. 215 Glenn.Hicks@tucsonaz.gov SUBJECT: D07-0028 Target Fulfillment Center West: Development Plan Review(8-16-07) Approved. |
| 08/31/2007 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES August 31, 2007 Ken Perry Engineering & Environmental Consultants, Inc. (EEC) 4625 East Fort Lowell Road Tucson, Arizona 85712 Subject: D07-0028 Target Fulfillment Center West Development Plan Dear Ken: Your submittal of August 16, 2007 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 9 Copies Revised Development Plan (Wastewater, Fire, TEP, ADOT, Traffic, Zoning, Addressing, Landscape, DSD) 3 Copies Revised Landscape Plan (Zoning, Landscape, DSD) 2 Copies Revised ERR (Landscape, DSD) 2 Copies Traffic Impact Analysis (ADOT, DSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4919. Sincerely, Patricia Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 321-0333 |