Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Permit Number - D07-0028
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06/26/2007 | FRODRIG2 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 06/28/2007 | TIM ROWE | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | June 27, 2007 To: Ken Perry EEC Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department ___________________________ From: Tom Porter, Sr. CEA (520-740-6579), representing the Pima County Departments of Wastewater Management and Environment Quality Subject: Target Fulfillment Center West Dev. Plan - 1st Submittal D07-028 The proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. 1. Obtain a letter from the PCWMD's Development Services Section, written within the past 90 days, stating that treatment and conveyance system capacity for the project is available in the downstream public sewerage system and provide a copy of that letter to this office. The required form to request such a letter may be found at: http://www.pima.gov/wwm/forms/docs/CapResponseRequest.pdf. The development plan for this project cannot be approved until a copy of this letter has been received by this office. 2. Show the jurisdiction's case number, D07-028, in or near the title block of each sheet. This case number should be shown larger and bolder than any associated cross-reference numbers. 3. Sheet 2: Add a General Note that states: THIS PROJECT WILL HAVE ______ EXISTING AND______ PROPOSED WASTEWATER FIXTURE UNIT EQUIVALENTS PER TABLE 13.20.045(E)(1) IN PIMA COUNTY CODE 13.20.045(E). And fill in the blanks with the appropriate values. 4. Sheet 3: Show the off-site proposed public sewer line running along Rita Rd . All public sewer elements (manholes cleanouts, mains and easements), that are located on this project or are less than 100' from this project, are identified with IMS numbers, construction plan number and easement descriptions and recording information. The IMS numbers and construction plan numbers, are the sewer element identification numbers, that may be found on PCWMD Maps and Records (5th floor) basemaps or at PCWMD and PCDOT MapGuide internet websites. 5. Sheet 3: Sewer directional flow arrows are missing on the sewer lines. 6. Sheet 3: The sewer line running in Rita Tech Pl. should be marked as public until it leaves the ROW then it can be clearly shown as private. 7. Sheet 3: The sewer line running south to SSMH #9 appears to run outside of the street. Provide easement recordation information if that is the case. Also where the sewer line runs east across the catch basin provide the sewer invert vs. basin invert. 8. Sheet 4: Where each of the 6" BCS connect with the 8" sewer line a manhole should be installed. 9. Sheet 4: For the cleanouts shown on plan the rim elevations should be given as well. 10. Sheet 5: Sewer directional flow arrows are missing on the sewer lines. 11. Sheets 3-5: Mark the manholes as private except for the manholes in Rita Tech Pl. which must be public. This office will require a revised set of bluelines, and a response letter, addressing these comments. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. Pima County Code Title 13.20.030.A.2 requires that a wastewater review fee be paid for each submittal of the development plan. The fee for the first submittal is $166 plus $50 per sheet. For the second submittal, the review fee is $50 per sheet. For all subsequent submittals, the review fee is $39 per sheet. The next submittal of this project will be the second (2nd) submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $200 (made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER) must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. If you have any questions regarding the above-mentioned comments, please contact me. |
| 07/03/2007 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Denied | D07-0028, EEC Drawings 16 Sheets Fire protection items on all sheets should be coordinated with the R.A.S.K. drawings. Items such as hydrants, fire risers, and fire lanes should be checked. Sheets 3 and 8 Hydrants appear to be in the fire lanes. They are on the opposite side of the lane from those shown on the fire protection drawings. Sheets 5 and 6 Hydrants should be adjacent to paved fire access lanes. Sheet 7 Hydrants north of column lines 3 and 12 cannot be behind truck parking, see IFC Section 508.5.4. R.A.S.K. drawings have one correctly located but the hydrant on column line 3 is still behind the truck parking. Sheets 7 and 8 Even security gates need to be 20 feet clear and have fire department lock box. Section 503.6.1 Security gates. Is hereby AMENDED by ADDING the following subsections: Section 503.6.1 Electric operating gates. Gates that use electric or other means of power to automatically open or unlock shall have a manual override system. Manual override controls shall be located on the entrance side of gate, or when power has failed, the gates(s) shall open and stay open until power is restored for normal operations. Section 503.6.2 Fire apparatus access road gates. Gates/barricades securing the fire apparatus access roads shall comply with all of the following criteria: 1. The minimum gate width shall be 20 feet (6096 mm) unobstructed. 2. Gates shall be of the swinging or sliding type. 3. Construction of gates shall be of materials that allow manual operation by one person. 4. Gate components shall be maintained in an operative condition at all times and replaced or repaired when defective. 5. Electric gates shall be equipped with a means of opening the gate by fire department personnel for emergency access on to the property or leaving the property. 6. Locking device specifications shall be submitted for approval to the fire code official. 7. Gates/barricades that are permanently secured for access reasons shall be posted with the approved fire access signs, on both sides of the gate/barricade. Signs can be mounted on gate or follow requirements under section Appendix D. Sheet 10 The hydrant that is on City water is missing from this area. Sheet 15 Road sections J and K need no-parking signs. Section D101 SIGNS Every fire apparatus access roadway required under the authority of this section shall be posted with signs installed at points not more than one-hundred (100) feet apart along the length of the required fire apparatus access roadway. The bottom of every such sign shall not be less than seven (7) feet or more than ten (10) feet from the ground surface level. Signs shall be posted to face the direction of travel. Construction, installation, and maintenance of the signs shall be done at no expense to the City. Materials and locations of each sign shall be indicated in the plans submitted to the fire department. Fire access signs shall conform to the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. The required sign shall be the international NO PARKING sign with a standard sign size (width and height) of 12 x 18 inches (300 x 450 mm), on a white reflective background. The international NO PARKING symbol shall be a black P, six inches high. Underneath the NO PARKING symbol, in one-and-five-eighths inch high and one-quarter inch stroke, in red lettering it shall read: FIRE ACCESS TOW-AWAY Only fire apparatus access roadways required under the authority of this section or as approved by the chief may be posted or identified with the approved sign shown above. Unauthorized signs shall be removed. Section D102 Roads. Roads 20 to 28 feet in width. Fire apparatus access roads 20 to 28 feet wide shall be posted on both sides as a fire lane. Roads greater than 28 and up to 36 feet in width. Fire apparatus access roads greater than 28 and up to 36 feet wide shall be posted on one side of the road as a fire lane. Exception: Roads 34 feet or wider with wedge curbs on both sides, need not to be posted. |
| 07/09/2007 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Denied | 4350 E. Irvington Road, Tucson, AZ 85714 Post Office Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702 WR#184029 July 9, 2007 Engineering & Environmental Consultants, Inc. Attn: Ken Perry 4625 E Ft. Lowell Road Tucson, Arizona 85712 Dear Mr. Perry: SUBJECT: Target Fulfillment Center West - Lots 1-7 D07-0028 Tucson Electric Power Company (TEP) has reviewed the plan submitted June 26, 2007. TEP is unable to approve the plan at this time. There are existing electrical facilities within the boundaries of this project. In order for TEP to approve the plan the facilities and easements must be depicted on the plans. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facility map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. All costs associated with the relocation of the facilities in conflict will be billable to the developer. Please resubmit two revised bluelines to City of Tucson for TEP's review. You may contact the area Designer, Steve Garcia, at 917-8739 should you have any questions. Sincerely, Elizabeth Miranda Office Specialist lm Enclosure cc: DSD_CDRC@tucsonaz.gov, City of Tucson S. Garcia, Tucson Electric Power |
| 07/10/2007 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Denied | ADOT/Regional Traffic would like to know if a traffic study has been done for this project. If one has been done ADOT would like a copy for our files. If not, we will need some type of document on the impact of this project on the adjacent traffic interchange. Thank you DK. -------------------------------------------------------- Confidentiality and Nondisclosure Notice: This email transmission and any attachments are intended for use by the person(s)/entity(ies) named above and may contain confidential/privileged information. Any unauthorized use, disclosure or distribution is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by email, and delete or destroy all copies plus attachments. |
| 07/10/2007 | CDRC1 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Approved | CASE: D07-0028, TARGET FULFILLMENT CTR WEST DEVEL PLAN COMMENT: NO OBJECTIONS OR ADVERSE COMMENTS The proposed development could fall into more than one category. Trip generation information has been provided for each potential category. 1. Light Industrial Vehicle Trip Generation: Daily: 8,364 PM Peak: 1,176 2. Warehouse Vehicle Trip Generation: Daily: 5,952 PM Peak: 564 Please call if you have questions Tom Cooney, Travel Forecasting Manager Pima Association of Governments 177 N. Church Ave, #405 Tucson, AZ 85701 Tel: (520) 792-1093, Fax: (520) 620-6981 Web: www.PAGnet.org and www.RTAmobility.com |
| 07/11/2007 | MATT FLICK | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | The Development Plan has been reviewed and is NOT APPROVED. The following comments are offered: General: Insufficient horizontal control is provided for the channel and basin construction. Please provide additional horizontal dimensioning. Sheet 2: In appears there are also private streets in addition to public streets. Revise General Note #7 to include mileage of private streets. Sheet 2: Grading Note #24 should refer to the City of Tucson, not Pima County. Sheet 2: Grading Note #25 should refer to the City of Tucson, not Pima County. Sheet 3: There appears to be a gate southeast of the errant truck turnaround. Please call out and label as to type. Sheet 4: Please indicate flowrate for 6' curb opening located near truck parking. Sheet 8: Corrugated metal pipe is shown for the 36" pipes beneath Rita Park Place North. Please use RCP or other approved material for culverts within public right-of-way. Sheet 9: Corrugated metal pipe is shown for the 36" pipes beneath E Rita Park Place. Please use RCP or other approved material for culverts within public right-of-way. Sheet 10: Indicate size of curb opening and flowrate for flow at northeast corner of trailer parking storage area. Sheet 10: Indicate pavement material around guard house and security gate. Sheet 11: Indicate flowrate for curb opening at terminus of central access lane. Sheet 11: Locate riprap outfall at curb opening near northeast corner of trailer parking storage area. Sheet 13: Extend 6' sidewalk along Rita Road to southern property terminus. Sheet 15: Indicate 6' sidewalk width and distance from sidewalk to back of curb in Section L. Sheet 15: Indicate thicknesses in Section M. Sheet 16: Indicate ponding depth, wsel and bottom elevation for Sections D - F. DRAINAGE REPORT: The drainage report was reviewed for development plan and grading plan purposes and is CONDITIONALLY APPROVED upon correction of the following: Attachment 1: No figure was present in the pocket. Attachment 2 (WASH Ordinance): Please provide the attachment. Figure 5: Please correct flowrates and channel numbering as discussed. GRADING PLAN: The plan was reviewed for general grading compliance. In addition to the above comments, it should be noted that a SWPPP is necessary with the grading plan submittal. Please include a copy of the NOI in the SWPPP. |
| 07/11/2007 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Target Fulfillment Center West D07-0028 Development Plan (1st Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: July 11, 2007 DUE DATE: June 25, 2008 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a separate response letter for zoning, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is June 25, 2008. 2. DSD Zoning section has reviewed this plan as a development plan for the proposed Target Fulfillment Center only. The proposed lot split/lot line reconfigure may require a tentative/final plat. Remove all information regarding "SUBDIVISION" from this plan. 3. D.S. 2-05.2.2.B.1 General Note 1 should read "EXISTING ZONING IS I2 AND RX1". 4. D.S. 2-05.2.2.B.2 Add a note to the plan next to the "EXISTING ZONING" note which states "PROPOSED ZONING IS I1 AND C2". 5. D.S. 2-05.2.2.B.2 The "REZONING CONDITIONS (PER C9-00-23) listed on sheet 2 of 16 do not match the amended rezoning conditions, dated June 19, 2007. Revised the rezoning conditions. Provide a separate letter demonstrating how the rezoning conditions have been complied with. 6. D.S. 2-05.2.2.B.3 List the proposed use of the property. This project was reviewed as a "COMMERCIAL STORAGE" use. 7. D.S. 2-05.2.2.B.10 Add a note to the plan stating "THIS PROJECT IS DESIGNED TO MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE OVERLAY ZONES CRITERIA: SEC. 2.8.5, AIRPORT ENVIRONS ZONE (AEZ)". 8. D.S. 2-05.2.2.B.11 List the gross area of the site, Target project only, by square footage and acreage. 9. D.S. 2-05.2.3.B Show all easements of record on the plan. There are numerous easements shown on S01-006 Rita 244 block plat that will need to be abandoned under a separate instrument. Provide documentation of the abandonment. 10. D.S. 2-05.2.3.C Provide a dimension to the curb for Rita Road. 11. D.S. 2-05.2.4.A Clarify all lot lines and provide distance and bearings on all sheets. Please be aware that there are parcels shown on these plans, part of the proposed subdivision, that do not meet the minimum requirements for site area, five (5) acres, per LUC Sec. 2.8.5.8.C.1.c. 12. D.S. 2-05.2.4.A List the existing zoning for the parcel located to the north of the parcel called out as "STATE LAND RX1". Also list the zoning for the parcel called out as "SLIMFAST SITE". 13. D.S. 2-05.2.4.G If applicable show all proposed easements graphically on the plan and label as to their purposes and whether they will be public of private. 14. D.S. 2-05.2.4.I Provide building setback dimensions, from the building to all property lines, on the plan. 15. D.S. 2-05.2.4.K There does not appear to be a continuous pedestrian circulation/accessible route provided from the proposed street to the proposed building. The sidewalk shown appears to stop at the northwest corner of the largest parking area near the southwest corner of the proposed generator pad and then continues on from the east side of the proposed generator pad. Demonstrate on the plan how the continuous pedestrian circulation/accessible route is working in this area. 16. D.S. 2-05.2.4.K It is not clear how the disabled will gain access to the proposed building from the proposed street. Show all proposed curb access ramps on the plan. Detectable warnings (truncated domes) will be required at all curb access ramps. ICC/ANSI A117.1-2003 Sec. 406.13. Additional comments maybe forth coming. 17. D.S. 2-05.2.4.K It is not clear how the disabled will gain access to the sidewalk from the disabled vehicle parking space access aisles located along the south side of the building. Demonstrate on the plan how this access will work. 18. D.S. 2-05.2.4.K A sidewalk is required from the parking area located near the northwest corner of the parcel to the building. 19. D.S. 2-05.2.4.K Provide dimension for the widths of all proposed sidewalks. 20. D.S. 2-05.2.4.M Provide, as a note, the square footage of the each proposed structure and the specific use proposed. 21. D.S. 2-05.2.4.N Label the height and provide overall dimensions of each proposed structure on the plans. 22. D.S. 2-05.2.4.O Show all loading zones, fully dimensioned, and provide, as a note, the number of loading spaces required and the number provided. Per LUC Sec. 3.4.5.2 the dimensions for the required loading spaces for this project are twelve (12) feet by fifty-five (55) feet. Additional comments maybe forth coming. 23. D.S. 2-05.2.4.P As a note, provide calculations for the number of vehicle parking spaces required (include the ratio used), and the number provided, including the number of spaces required and provided for the physically disabled. Per LUC Sec. 3.3.4 STORAGE USE GROUP, Commercial Storage, the square footage of the areas listed as "TRAILER PARKING/STORAGE AREAS" will need to be included in the parking calculation or re-designated as "STAGING AREAS". Additional comments maybe forth coming. 24. D.S. 2-05.2.4.P Provide a typical parking space detail for standard parking spaces. 25. D.S. 2-05.2.4.P On the disabled parking space detail provide the maximum allowed surface slopes per ICC/ANSI A117.1-2003 Sec. 502.5. 26. D.S. 2-05.2.4.P Provide a detail for the required disabled signage. 27. D.S. 2-05.2.4.P Curb stops maybe required for all parking spaces located along the north side of the large parking area once the sidewalk width is verified, see comment 19. If the sidewalk is 6'-6" or wider no curb stops are required and the vehicle overhang must be shown and dimensioned on the plan 28. D.S. 2-05.2.4.Q Show, on the drawing, off-street bicycle parking locations. Provide a detail for both Class 1 & Class 2 bicycle parking which includes, materials for lighting and paving, type of security, dimensions, specific type of rack and the number of bicycles it supports. Additional comments maybe forth coming. 29. D.S. 2-05.2.4.Q Provide, as a note, calculations on the number of bicycle spaces required and the number provided. 30. D.S. 2-05.2.4.R Show all sight visibility triangles (SVT) on the plan. 31. D.S. 2-05.2.4.T Show refuse collection areas, including locations of dumpsters fully dimensioned. 32. D.S. 2-05.2.4.U Once the correct rezoning conditions are provided on the plan, see comment 5, compliance with the conditions can be verified. 33. D.S. 2-05.2.4.W If applicable provide the location, type, size and height of existing and proposed freestanding signage and billboards. 34. Demonstrate on the plan how this project complies with the requirements of LUC Sections, 2.8.5.8.C, 2.8.5.9 and 2.8.5.11. 35. The parcel labeled as "SLIMFAST SITE" is no longer owned by SlimFast, revise to read "ARIZONA CANNING COMPANY". 36. Ensure that all changes to the development plan are reflected on the landscape plans. 37. Additional comments may be forth coming depending on how each comment has been addressed. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956. C:\planning\cdrc\developmentplan\D07-0028dp.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development plan and additional requested documents. |
| 07/11/2007 | ANDY VERA | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Denied | 1. No provisions mentioned or shown for refuse or recycle collection/disposal services. Required per DS 6-01.3 & 6-01.4. Recommend incorporating roll-off compactor equipment for garbage and recycle services to serve the needs of this project. Refer to DS 6-01.4.3 Please include with resubmittal. |
| 07/11/2007 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Denied | DATE: July 11, 2007 TO: DSD_CDRC@ tucsonaz.gov FROM: Glenn Hicks Parks and Recreation 791-4873 ext. 215 Glenn.Hicks@tucsonaz.gov SUBJECT: D07-028 Target Fulfillment Center West: Development Plan Review(6-26-07) Denied. Please schedule a meeting with Parks and Recreation to discuss the Julian Wash Linear Park. |
| 07/11/2007 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | The Landscape Section does not recommend approval at this time. General comments 1) Add the CDRC case number and any related case numbers to the landscape and native plant preservation plans. DS 2-07.2.1.B 2) Consult with Tucson Water on the potential of using reclaimed water for irrigation purposes in the future. LUC 3.7.4.2. 3) The vehicular use area must be provided with post barricades or wheel stop curbing designed to prevent parked vehicles from extending beyond the property lines; damaging adjacent landscaping, walls, or buildings and to prevent vehicles from driving onto unimproved portions of the site. per DS 3-05.2.3.C. Revise the plans as necessary where the required barrier is not proposed. 4) Revise the development plan to provide complete parking calculations. 5) Sheets 5 & 6 of the development plan indicate a chain link fence with razor wire using the same line defined in the legend on sheet 1 for a wrought iron fence. Please clarify. 6) Section L on sheet 15 of the development plan indicates the required Rita Road streetscape is to be constructed when each parcel is developed. The section could not be located on the drawing. The landscape plan show the streetscape and indicates that the additional required screening will be part of individual lot development. Please clarify. Graded areas on the site are required have the street landscape border per LUC 3.7.2.4 installed. Drainageways when constructed are also required to be landscaped per TCC 26-8(a)(3). 7) Provide information on the depth of basins 4,5,& 6 on sheet 16 of the development plan.. Basin slopes are required to have slopes no steeper than 4:1 where depths exceed three feet; 3:1 for unprotected slopes and 2: 1 for protected slopes for depths less than three feet. Revise as necessary. The depth of the basin is the actual measurement from the toe of the slope to the hinge point and may be greater than the differential between the basin bottom elevation and the WSEL. DS 10-01.4 8) The landscape plan sheet A4 shows a couple of PIP plants in the proposed driveway. Correct as necessary. 9) The landscape plan indicates that some of the native plant mitigation may be deferred to individual lots. Each phase of a project is required to comply with all requirements as a separate entity. It may be possible to post a bond to allow for installation at a later date. DS 2-05.2.4.C List the mitigation requirements in a summary for each lot on the first or second sheet. 10) Sheet B5 indicate PIP plants in the same locations as the basin slope. Verify that the required plant non-disturbance area can be maintained with grading in such close proximity. LUC 3.8.6.7 WASH and Floodplain 1) The project is subject to the provisions of the Watercourse, Amenities, Safety, and Habitat Ordinance (WASH), TCC 29. A separate application and review is required. Contact Patricia Gehlen/Zoning Manager at 837-4919 for submittal information. Submittal and approval of the WASH application is generally required prior to Development Plan approval and must be complete prior to development within the regulated area. 2) The site contains regulatory floodplain areas that may contain riparian habitat. Refer to DS 2-13 for the applicable preparation, submittal, and review procedures for development within areas that have environmentally valuable habitat in conformance with Article 1, Division 1, Floodplain and Erosion Hazard Area Regulations. 3) Submit an Environmental Resource Report (ERR) per DS 2-13.2.5.B.1 if encroachment is proposed in the regulatory area. The report will document (1) the areas that contain riparian and wildlife habitat that is to be preserved and (2) those areas without such habitat within the regulatory floodplain. 4) All tentative plats, development plans, site plans, plot plans or other plans providing for approval of development within property that includes any Regulated Area as defined in Development Standard 2-13.2.2.A shall identify and delineate the Regulated Areas and any Protected Riparian Areas. Revise the plans as necessary. 5) Where natural floodprone areas, such as washes, channels, drainageways, etc., exist within the development plan boundaries of the drawing, water surface contours for the 100-year flood with water surface elevations indicated must be shown and clearly labeled. 6) All development within the Protected Riparian Area shall be reviewed to insure that there is no unnecessary disturbance of the riparian resources. Refer to DS 2-13.2.5.B.2 for the section on Development Restrictions and revise the plans as necessary to comply. 7) Where any development encroaches within the Protected Riparian Areas, mitigation will be required. A mitigation report shall be submitted with the Environmental Resource Report demonstrating that the proposed mitigation is in conformance with this subsection and applicable codes. DS 2-13.2.5.C 8) Landscape plans are required to document compliance with the mitigation plan requirements. A summary of mitigation and preservation requirements shall be included on the plans. The plans shall show the location of mitigation areas; techniques used for mitigating impacts to, or preservation of, natural areas; specifications for restoration and revegetation of disturbed areas; and general compliance with the applicable standards. Revise as necessary. NPPO 1) Revise NPPO note 1 to correct the statement regarding riparian areas if the site includes areas described in DS 2-13.2.2.C or DS 2-13.2.3. 2) Revise the plan to describe the proposed NPPO compliance methodology. It appears that the Inventory methodology, the sample inventory methodology, and the plant appraisal method are all used. Fix or remove the erroneous title block reference LUC 3.8.6.1. Separate mitigation calculations are required for each methodology. 3) Provide an analysis of the site per DS 2-15.3.3.A that describes the approach. 4) Provide information on the NPPO Plan regarding the Appraisal Methodology Calculations on sheet 2 of the landscape plan. LUC 3.8.6.5.B 5) Submit the plant appraisal for Acacia constricta. The plant appraisal is to be prepared according to the most current methods and procedures accepted by the Council of Tree and Landscape Appraisers. Clarify how the average value was determined. LUC 3.8.6.3 6) Revise the NPPO to provide additional information on the sample methodology inventory areas. Clarify if the sample is intended to represent the whole site or a portion thereof, provide calculations. DS 2-15.3.1.A.4&5 7) Revise the NPPO plan to clarify how the sample data has been extrapolated for the sample methodology application area. 8) Revise the legend and symbols on sheet 1 of the NPPO plan to clarify the information presented on the key map. 9) Revise sheets 15 and 16 of the NPPO plan to include property/ROW lines. DS 2-15.3.1.A.3 10) Revise the NPPO/landscape plans to mitigate protected plants removed from Rita Road. These mitigation plants should be installed in the public right-of-way. Trees should be installed to shade the public sidewalks. City Engineer approval is required the ROW NPPO and landscape plans. LUC 3.7.2.9, LUC 3.7.5 11) Revise the Appraisal methodology calculations on sheet 2. 80% of the appraised value of Acacia constricta is to be used to replace that species on the site. The remaining 20% may be used to cover the costs for purchase and installation of other protected native plants that shall be planted in locations able to support their long-term health and survival and shall be planted in densities and configurations to approximate the natural character of the Sonoran Desert. LUC 3.8.6.3.B, LUC 3.8.6.6.B. 12) Revise the planting schedule data for Acacia constricta on sheet 2. The quantities should match the appraisal calculations as presented or revised. 13) Show required sight visibility triangles on the landscape plan. Plant materials located within SVT's should consist of ground cover or low-growing vegetation of a species that will not grow higher than (30) inches. However, trees may be planted within SVT's provided that: A) The trunk caliper, at maturity, will not exceed twelve (12) inches in diameter; B) The lowest branch of any tree is at least six (6) feet above the grade of the street, and C) Trees are not planted in a line that could result in a solid wall effect when viewed from an angle. Revise as necessary. LUC 3.7.2.8 & DS 2-06 14) Revise the landscape plan to include street names and lot numbers. DS 2-07.2.1.A Landscape Plan 1) Complete the area calculations on sheet 1. 2) Provide the square footage of the vehicular use area. DS 2-07.2.2.a.2.c 3) Revise the landscape plans to show the limits of grading. DS 2-07.2.2.B.5 4) Based on the site and native plant preservation plans, it appears that most of the site will be graded and cleared of vegetation. Revise the landscape plan to indicate proposed dust control methods in compliance with LUC 3.7.2.7. General note 3 indicates that containerized plants and 2" layer of decomposed granite will be used. Will this treatment be used on the entire site including basins and areas designated for future lot development? 5) Revise the spacing of canopy trees in the street landscape borders. Per LUC 3.7.2.4 one tree is required for every thirty-three foot segment. Thus, no the space between two adjacent trees cannot exceed sixty-six feet. 6) Revise sheet D7 to locate the proposed parking lot trees in the designated tree planters. LUC 3.7.2.3 7) Revise the native plant preservation plans to show/identify the limits of grading. DS 2-15.3.4.A 8) Landscape plans shall include a summary of plants required for mitigation. Show the total PIP, TOS, required mitigation for each species. DS 2-15.3.4.B 9) Revise the landscape plan to include a mitigation summary for riparian habitat removed from the 100 year floodplain. This summary is separate from the NPPO summary. DS 2-12.2.2.A.3.b 10) Indicate the slope ratios and any proposed or required stabilization materials on the landscape plan. Ensure that the proposed plantings are compatible with the drainage scheme. DS 2-07.2.2.B&D 11) Include the plant quantities for all species on the landscape plans. DS 2-07.2.0 |
| 07/11/2007 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: D07-0028 TARGET FULFILLMENT CENTER WEST/DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE: July 11, 2007 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: Add recording information for Rita 244 in Legal Description. Correct 141-22-004J to 141-22-006C. Correct 141-22-004H to 141-22-004L. Delete adjacent Docket/Page information. Correct all lot numbers to the existing Block number per current recorded plat. Provide copy of Combo Form for Blocks 2 thru 8 prior to approval of this project. Provide copy of recorded Abandonment of or vacated roads prior to approval of this project. Delete all interior street names. If the existing platted streets are abandoned or vacated, the Development Plan process cannot establish public streets. Delete direction from Rita Road on all sheets. jg |
| 07/11/2007 | CDRC1 | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Denied | >>> Jim Stoyanoff 07/11/2007 10:33 AM >>> The following items need to be addressed by separate instrument or by a subdivision plat before this development can be approved. 1.) Key Note no.# 1 on the Rita 244 plat, Book 55 at Page 71, shows a 10' Utility easement running along side the vacated rights of way that needs to be abandoned by all utility companies having an interest in the easement, a legal description for this utility easement will need to submitted to the Real Estate Division for document preparation to abandon Tucson Waters interest only. 2.) Key Note no.# 4 on the Rita 244 plat, Book 55 at Page 71 shows a Water line easement granted to Tucson Water, this too will need a separate legal description for document preparation. 3.) The new right of way as shown on the development plan will need to be surveyed and a legal description will need to be submitted to the Real Estate Division for document preparation. |
| 07/11/2007 | JOSE ORTIZ | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Denied | July 3, 2007 ACTIVITY NUMBER: D07-0028 PROJECT NAME: Target Fullfillment Center PROJECT ADDRESS: 9047 S Rita Rd PROJECT REVIEWER: Jose E. Ortiz PE, Traffic Engineer Resubmittal Required: Traffic Engineering does not recommend approval of the Development Plan; therefore a revised Development Plan is required for re-submittal. The following items must be revised or added to the development plan. 1. Include a response letter with the next submittal that states how all comments have been addressed. 2. Show and label all existing and future SVTs (DS 2-05.2.4.R) 3. Call out the radius on all curb returns. The access points shall have 25' radius curb returns along all major streets & route, and 18' radius curb returns along local to local/PAALS. (DS 3-01.0 figure 6) 4. Call out PAAL widths, minimum is 24'. 5. This plan does not seem to take into account the future intersection widening in accordance with the Major Streets and Routes plan. A 90' right of way section widens to 120' at major intersections such as E. Rita Tech Place and Rita Road. 6. Provide the Traffic Impact Analysis as required by the rezoning conditions. 7. A private improvement agreement (PIA) will be necessary for the proposed work to be performed within the Right-of-way. An approved tentative plat is required prior to applying for a PIA. Contact the PIA Coordinator for additional PIA information at 791-5550 ext. 1107. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-4259 x76730 or Jose.Ortiz@tucsonaz.gov |
| 07/12/2007 | PGEHLEN1 | TUCSON WATER NEW AREA DEVELOPMENT | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 07/12/2007 | ED ABRIGO | PIMA COUNTY | ASSESSOR | Passed | |
| 07/13/2007 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES July 13, 2007 Ken Perry Engineering & Environmental Consultants, Inc. (EEC) 4625 East Fort Lowell Road Tucson, Arizona 85712 Subject: D07-0028 Target Fulfillment Center West Development Plan Dear Ken: Your submittal of June 26, 2007 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 14 Copies Revised Development Plan (Wastewater, Fire, TEP, ADOT, ESD, Traffic, Zoning, Addressing, Real Estate, Engineering, Parks and Recreation, Landscape, Assessor, DSD) 5 Copies Revised Landscape Plan (Zoning, Engineering, Parks and Recreation, Landscape, DSD) 2 Copies Revised NPPO Plan (Landscape, DSD) 2 Copies Revised Drainage Report (Engineering, DSD) 3 Copies Traffic Impact Analysis (ADOT, Traffic, DSD) THE NEXT SUBMITTAL OF THIS PLAN MUST BE REVISED TO BE A DEVELOPMENT PLAN/TENTATIVE PLAT. PLEASE REFER TO DS 2-03 FOR TENTATIVE PLAT INFORMATION. SOME OF THE REVIEWERS COMMENTS WILL CHANGE ONCE A TENTATIVE PLAT IS SUBMITTED. THE PIMA COUNTY ASSESSORS OFFICE HAS BEEN ADDED BACK TO THE REVIEW SINCE THEY REVIEW PLATS BUT NOT DEVELOPMENT PLANS. Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4919. Sincerely, Patricia Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 321-0333 |
| 07/13/2007 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Approv-Cond | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN COMMENTS Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT D07-0028 Target Fulfillment Center 07/12/07 ( ) Tentative Plat (XXXX) Development Plan (XXXX) Landscape Plan ( ) Revised Plan/Plat ( ) Board of Adjustment ( ) Other CROSS REFERENCE: C9-00-23 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: General Plan GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: COMMENTS DUE BY: 7/15/07 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: ( ) No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment ( ) Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions ( ) RCP Proposal Complies with Plan Policies ( ) See Additional Comments Attached ( ) No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: (XXXXX) Resubmittal Required: ( ) Tentative Plat ( ) Development Plan ( ) Landscape Plan ( ) Other REVIEWER: drcorra 791-4505 DATE: 7/10/07 COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION COMMENTS D07-0028 Target Fulfillment Center This site is subject to the restrictions of Rezoning Case C9-0023 Please note comments below: 1. Rezoning Condition #1.B states "Provision for a hierarchy of streets, including a spine road that will facilitate access to Rita Road from the Sate Lands on the south and east boundaries of the rezoning site." Urban Planning & Design defers to the Transportation Department; however, suggests applicant indicate, with a note on the development plan, where spine roads facilitating access to Rita from the State Lands on the south and east boundaries will be. Such note to be reviewed by DSD. |