Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Permit Number - D07-0023
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 05/22/2007 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 05/24/2007 | PAUL MACHADO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | To: Patricia Gehlen DATE: July 24, 2007 CDRC/Zoning Manager SUBJECT: Cutting Edge Fabrications, 8317 S. Camino De Cafe Development Plan D07-0023 (First Review) T15S, R15E, Section 27 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Development Plan and Drainage Report. The Development Plan (DP) and Drainage Report (DR) cannot be approved as submitted. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal. Development Plan: 1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the DP. 2. This project is in a balanced basin and requires retention as well as detention. A current DR is also required. 3. As per the Federal ADA requirements, all wheel chair ramps shall have the truncated domes instead of the standard grooves that are shown on COT SD 207. Aside from the Truncated Domes, all wheel chair ramps shall be constructed in accordance with COT SD 207. 4. Label existing and future sight visibility triangles per D.S. 2-02.2.1.10. 5. Show all points of egress and ingress including locations and width of driveways and parking area access lanes (P.A.A.L.) per D.S. 2-02.2.1.11. Show a cross-section of a typical area of the P.A.A.L. 6. Show the limits of the 100-year floodplain and water surface elevation per D.S. 2-02.2.1.15. 7. Please show dimensioned right-of-way, including any applicable Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Plan right-of-way per D.S. 2-02.2.1.19. 8. Add the basin(s) maintenance responsibility note per S.M.D.D.F.M. 2.3.1.6 C 1 and 2 to the DP. 9. Dimension from street monument lines to existing and proposed curbs, sidewalks, driveways, and utility lines per D.S. 2-02.2.1.21. 10. Location and orientation of existing major physical features, such as railroad tracks and drainageways per D.S. 2-02.2.1.22. 11. Show Development plan number (D07-0023) on all sheets per D.S. 2-02.2.1.29. 12. Show refuse container location, size, and access thereto fully dimensioned per D.S. 2-02.2.1.32 and D.S. 6-01.0. There must be a clear area of 10'x10' inside the refuse container from side to side and front to back. 13. A permit or a private improvement agreement will be necessary for any work performed within the Right-of-way. Contact Permits and Codes at (520) 791-5100 for permit information. 14. Please show a typical cross section of the P.A.A.L. or call out the percentage of slopes. Call out the GB at the D/W, if applicable. 15. Please show the proposed roof drainage patterns, 100% of the 10-year flow must be conveyed under the sidewalks including any other site drainage as well. Please provide supporting calculations to demonstrate compliance with D.S. 3-01.4.4. If the location(s) of the roof scuppers have not yet been decided, a general note indicating sidewalk scuppers will be used when the roof scuppers locations have been designed and located will suffice. 16. List the consulting engineer and the owner/developer on the plans with the pertinent information. 17. Add note: "Depress all landscaped areas 6" maximum for water harvesting". 18. A Stormwater pollution prevention plan is required. Contact Paul P. Machado at 791-5550 x1193 for additional information. 19. "A grading permit and Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans (SWPPP's) will be required for this project. Submit 3 sets of grading and SWPPP's with text, upon completion and submittal of a grading permit application. A grading permit may not be issued prior to site plan approval. Subsequent comments may be necessary, depending upon the nature and extent of revisions that occur to the plans". 20. The Basis of Bearing called out on the plans does not seen to match the plat of Rita/Brown. Address as necessary. Drainage Report: 1. The DR submitted is for the entire Rita Ranch Industrial, lots 1-42, submitted in 2002. A new and separate DR for the two lots being developed will be required. 2. This project is in a balanced basin. 3. The DR will include calculations pertaining to retention as well as detention. 4. A Drainage report is required for any site greater than one acre in size or for any site subject to detention requirements…..per S.M.D.D.F.M., chap. II, 2.1.2. 5. The content and format of the Drainage Report should follow S.M.D.D.F.M., chap. II, 2.2. 6. Show the project address or administration address on the cover sheet of the DR. 7. If applicable, add the basin(s) maintenance responsibility note and checklist per S.M.D.D.F.M. 2.3.1.6 C 1 and 2 to the DR. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 837-4932 or Paul.Machado@ci.tucsonaz.govs Paul P. Machado Senior Engineering Associate City of Tucson/Development Services Department 201 N. Stone Avenue P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210 (520) 837-4932 office (520) 879-8010 fax C:/8317 S. Camino De Cafe CDRC |
| 05/24/2007 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approv-Cond | Fire lock boxes are required at gates. |
| 05/30/2007 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | ADOT has NO COMMENT D07-0023 THE BUILDING ENVIROMENT CUTTING EDGE FABRICATION -------------------------------------------------------- Confidentiality and Nondisclosure Notice: This email transmission and any attachments are intended for use by the person(s)/entity(ies) named above and may contain confidential/privileged information. Any unauthorized use, disclosure or distribution is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by email, and delete or destroy all copies plus attachments. |
| 06/01/2007 | TIM ROWE | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | June 1, 2007 To: Matthew Hamilton, The Built Environment Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department ____________________________________ From: Tom Porter, Sr. CEA (520-740-6579), representing the Pima County Departments of Wastewater Management and Environmental Quality Subject: Cutting Edge Fabrication Brown/Rita Ranch - Lots 1 & 2 Development Plan – 1st Submittal D07-0023 The proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. Obtain a letter from the PCWMD's Development Services Section, written within the past 90 days, stating that treatment and conveyance system capacity for the project is available in the downstream public sewerage system and provide a copy of that letter to this office. The required form to request such a letter may be found at: http://www.pima.gov/wwm/forms/docs/CapResponseRequest.pdf. The development plan for this project cannot be approved until a copy of this letter has been received by this office. All Sheets: Add the case number, D07-0023, to the title block of each sheet. This number should be shown larger or bolder than any cross reference numbers. No wastewater review fees will be charged for sheets where this is the only required revision. Sheet C1: Revise Note #14 so that it states: THIS PROJECT WILL HAVE ______ EXISTING AND______ PROPOSED WASTEWATER FIXTURE UNIT EQUIVALENTS PER TABLE 13.20.045(E)(1) IN PIMA COUNTY CODE 13.20.045(E). And fill in the blanks with the appropriate values. Sheet C1: Add a General Note that states: ANY WASTEWATER DISCHARGED INTO THE PUBLIC SANITARY SEWERAGE SYSTEM SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE INDUSTRIAL WASTE ORDINANCE (PIMA COUNTY ORDINANCE NO. 1991-140, AS AMENDED). Sheet 1: Add a Permitting Note that states: A PROJECT CONSTRUCTION PERMIT MUST BE SECURED FROM PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT BEFORE BEGINNING ANY WORK ON THIS PROJECT. Sheet C2: Show the public and private sewer lines using different line-types, so that they can readily be distinguished from each other. Also, show and describe examples of these different linetypes in the legend on Sheet 1.There should also be a difference between the existing and the proposed sewer line as well. Sheet C2: The IMS #’s for all existing manholes need to be shown on plan. Also the existing sewer line/manholes need to be marked as public and the plan # for the public sewer line should be shown. Show directional flow arrows on existing public sewer and private HCS. Sheet C2: The size/length/slope and material of HCS needs to be shown on plan. Sheet C2: Revise the plan to show cleanouts w/ rim and invert elevations at all bends in HCS. Also there should be a cleanout symbol in the legend on Sheet 1. SheetC 2: Revise the plan to show where the existing public sewer goes from sta. 150 on Camino de Café. The BCS needs to show size/slope/length and material. Also cleanouts need to be clearly marked w/rim and invert elevations. There should be a cleanout at every bend. The method of connection to the existing sewer should be shown. This office will require a revised set of bluelines, and a response letter, addressing these comments. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. Pima County Code Title 13.20.030.A.2 requires that a wastewater review fee be paid for each submittal of the development plan. The fee for the first submittal is $166 plus $50 per sheet. For the second submittal, the review fee is $50 per sheet. For all subsequent submittals, the review fee is $39 per sheet. The next submittal of this project will be the 2nd submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $100.00(made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER) must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. If you have any questions regarding the above mentioned comments, please contact me . |
| 06/12/2007 | KAROL ARAGONEZ | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Karol Aragonez Planner PROJECT: D07-0023 Cutting Edge Fabrication Development Plan TRANSMITTAL DATE: June 7, 2007 DUE DATE: June 20, 2007 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is May 22, 2007. 2. Please make sure that all lettering on the development plan is the equivalent of twelve (0.12") point or greater in size. DS 2-05.2.1.C 3. Please include the contour interval with the north arrow on all applicable sheets of the development plan. DS 2-03.2.1.H 4. Please include the hatch pattern used to indicate those area on the site to be asphalt in the legend. DS 2-03.2.1.J 5. Please add annexation case number C9-84-84 and subdivision case number S99-049 in the lower right corner of all sheets of the development plan, landscape plan, and NPPO> DS 2-03.2.1.K 6. Case number D07-0023 has been assigned to this development plan. Please place this number in the right corner of all sheets of the development plan, landscape plan, NPPO, and any other associated sheets. DS 2-05.2.2.B.2 7. Please add all applicable annexation conditions (C9-84-84 Zoning Ordinance 6143) to the development plan and provide a separate response letter detailing compliance with those annexation conditions. DS 2-05.2.2.7 & DS 2-05.2.4.U 8. Please add as a general note the following: "The project is designed to meet the overlay zone criteria: Sec. 2.8.3, Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Setback Zone and Sec. 2.8.5, Airport Environs Zone (AEZ)". DS 2-05.2.2.B.10 9. Please draw all existing easements on the plan along with recordation information, location, width, and purpose. If an easement is no longer in use and scheduled to be vacated or has been abandoned, so indicate. If none exist provide response to reviewer's comments. Also if easements are purposed please draw, dimension and label as to their purpose and whether they will be public or private. If none exist provide response to reviewer's comments. DS 2-05.2.3.B & DS 2-05.2.4.G 10. Please provide the type and dimensioned width of existing paving and sidewalks within Old Vail Road and Camino De Cafe. Add the width of wedge curbing to keynote 14. DS 2-05.2.3.C 11. Please provide a copy of the Pima County Tax Parcel Combo and record a covenant regarding development and use of real property. DS 2-05.2.4.A 12. Please indicate in the Parking requirements on sheet C1 the number of handicap parking spaces that will be van accessible. 13. Please dimension the concrete Pads from the fencing at the north and east and from the corner of the covered loading area to the dumpster. This is to assure that a minimum width of twenty-four (24) feet is maintained for a two-way PAAL. If the PAAL in the rear is intended to be one-way, a minimum PAAL width of twelve (12) feet is required and the PAAL is to be clearly marked to indicate direction of travel. DS 3-05.2.1.C.1 14. A minimum distance of five (5) feet for a pedestrian refuge must be maintained between any enclosed structure and a PAAL and is to contain a sidewalk that is set back one (1) foot from the PAAL and physically separated from the PAAL. A refuge area is to be provided along the east portion of the structure abutting the PAAL DS 3-05.2.2.B.1 15. A minimum distance of one (1) foot must be maintained between any open structure and a PAAL. The one (1) foot setback is conditioned upon the pedestrian way(s) being designed at a location other than between the open structure and the PAAL. The distance is measured to the closest part of the structure such as the roof overhang. Please provide for the covered loading area. DS 3-05.2.2.B.2 16. A minimum distance of two (2) feet must be maintained between a PAAL and any wall, screen, or other obstruction, provided pedestrian activity is directed to another location. Please indicate this setback from the wall and fence along the north and east to the PAAL. DS 3-05.2.2.B.3 17. Please add note that gates will remain open during normal business hours to allow access to required parking for employees and visitors. 18. Detectable warnings (truncated domes) are required at marked crossings (crosswalks). The area covered by the truncated domes shall be twenty-four (24) inch deep and extend the full width of the crosswalk or access aisle, preceding the crosswalk or access aisle in the direction of pedestrian travel. The domes shall be located so the edge nearest the curb line is six (6) inches to eight (8) inches from the curb line. Please revise detail 3/C4 to reflect this requirement. ANSI 406.12, ANSI 705 19. Please show and label the future curb and sidewalk location within Old Vail Road. Per the MS&R cross-section the future pedestrian area is set ten (10) feet from the property line. DS 2-05.2.4.F 20. Please provide dimensions from the future curb location in Old Vail Road to the proposed building, from the adjacent travel lane in Camino De Cafe to the proposed building, and from the north and east property line to the nearest edge of the proposed building. DS 2-05.2.4.I 21. At least one (1) sidewalk will be provided to the project sight from each street on which the project has frontage, unless there is no vehicle access from a street because of a physical barrier, such as a drainageway or an unbroken security barrier. At minimum a sidewalk must be provided from the pedestrian path within Camino De Cafe and connect to the pedestrian path within the project sight. DS 2-08.4.1.A & D 22. All sidewalks are to be accessible and are to be flood free for all storm discharges of up to ten (10) year flood event. Sidewalks are to a minimum of four (4) feet wide and be installed to avoid any obstruction which decreases the minimum width to less than four (4) feet. All accessible routes shall consist of a walking surface with a slope not steeper than 1:20. The cross slope of a walking surface shall not be steeper than 1:48. All slopes are to be indicated on the plan/plat and associated details. ANSI 403.3, DS 2-08.4.1.B, DS 2-08.5.1.A & D 23. Curb ramps or diagonal curb ramps shall be provided at all pedestrian crossings of vehicle use areas and streets where accessible routes are required. They shall be located so they do not project into vehicular traffic lanes, parking spaces, or parking access aisles. Ramps shall be located or protected to prevent their obstruction by parked vehicles. ANSI 406 Curb ramps shall be a minimum of three (3) feet in width, exclusive of flared sides. The curb ramp flares shall not be steeper than 1:10. Counter slopes of adjoining gutters and road surfaces immediately adjacent to the curb ramp shall not be steeper than 1:20. The adjacent surfaces at transitions at curb ramps to walks, gutters and streets shall be at the same level. All slopes are to be indicated on the plan/plat and associated details. ANSI 406.2, 3, & 4 Detectable warnings (truncated domes) are required at marked crossings (crosswalks). The area covered by the truncated domes shall be twenty-four (24) inch deep and extend the full width of the crosswalk or access aisle, preceding the crosswalk or access aisle in the direction of pedestrian travel. 24. Per LUC Sec. 3.4.3.3, the required calculation for the required number of off-street loading spaces is based on the proposed land use and the size of the project which includes the GFA of the use and any outdoor area dedicated to the use, but excluding vehicle use areas. Areas within covered loading area and outdoor concrete pads if dedicated to the use as storage or work area must be included in the off-street loading calculation. This may require addition spaces be provided. Please respond and revise as necessary. LUC 3.4.3.3 25. Per DS 2-09.4.1 Class 2 bicycle parking facilities will be located no more than fifty (50) feet from the main building entrance(s) and will be along the front side of the building as well as along other sides of the building that has an entrance. Bicycle access through the development will be separate from the pedestrian ways. Vehicular access may be used as bicycle access. Bicycle access to a parking facility may cross a pedestrian way at a right angle (DS2-09.3.2). Lighting will be provided such that all facilities are thoroughly illuminated and visible from adjacent sidewalks, parking lots, or buildings, during working hours. The surface of the facility can be surfaced the same as for motor vehicle parking or with a minimum of one (1) inch thickness of one-fourth (1/4) inch aggregate material. Please indicate on the plan compliance to these requirements. DS 2-09.5.1, DS2-09.5.2, DS 2-09.5.4, & DS 2-09.6.2 26. Please indicate the location and type of postal service to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements. If mail is to be delivered to an area within a building please state so on the plan. DS 2-05.2.4.V 27. Indicate the locations and types of proposed signs (wall, freestanding, pedestal) to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements and those minimal locational requirements can be met. Also indicate if there are existing billboards on site. Billboards will be required to meet all LUC requirements as stated in LUC Sec. 3.5.4.26. If none exists please state so. DS 2-05.2.4.W & LUC 3.5.4.26 28. This site is within the ADC-2 and NCD-A-65-70 Ldn. Per LUC Sec. 2.8.5.8.B.1.c the maximum FAR allowed is 0.30 of the project site. Please revise the FAR calculation on sheet C1 and provide the provided FAR percentage for the proposed total building area (0.27) LUC 2.8.5.8.B.1.c 29. Please add the following notes to meet requirements of the Airport Environs Zone (AEZ) ADC-2 and NCD-A-65-70 Ldn: a) "No more than twenty (20) employees per acre of the site area at any time may be accommodated by intention, design, or in fact." b) "The Final Plat Brown/Rita Ranch, Lots 1-42, Bk. 54, Pg. 84 was recorded June 7, 2001 prior to January 1, 2005 allowing lot 1 & 2, which are less than five (5) acres, to be developed in conformance with all other requirements specified in LUC Sec. 2.8.5.8.B.1, 2, and 3." d) "Offices on site will be sound attenuated, to reduce the interior noise level by twenty-five (25) decibels, to 40-45 Ldn, per DS9-05.0." 30. All changes, modifications, and/or corrections must be made on all applicable plans including the development plan, landscape plan, and NPPO. Once changes, modifications, and/or corrections are made and reviewed further comments may result. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Karol Aragonez, (520) 791-5550, ext. 74960. KAA S:\zoning review\karol\planning\cdrc\developmentplan\D07-0023dp.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development plan and additional requested documents. |
| 06/12/2007 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: D07-0023 CUTTING EDGE FABRICATION/DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE: June 12, 2007 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: Add recording Book and Page to Brown Rita Ranch in Legal Description. Delete Address information for Lot 1 and Lot 2. This project will use only one address. Delete all information from Address Block and leave blank. Delete Address Block from sheets 2 and 3. jg |
| 06/12/2007 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | 4350 E. Irvington Road, Tucson, AZ 85714 Post Office Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702 WR#182672 June 12, 2007 The Built Environment Attn: Matthew Hamilton 232 W 4th St. Tucson, AZ 85705 Dear Mr. Hamilton : SUBJECT: Cutting Edge Fabrication D07-0023 Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the development plan submitted June 6, 2007. It appears that there are no conflicts with the existing facilities within the boundaries of this proposed development. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. Any relocation costs will be billable to the customer. In order to apply for electric service, call the New Construction Department at (520) 918-8300. Submit a final set of plans including approved site, offsite and electrical load plans. Include a CD with the AutoCAD version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Your final plans should be sent to: Tucson Electric Power Company Attn: Ms. Mary Boice New Business Project Manager P. O. Box 711 (DB-101) Tucson, AZ 85702 520-917-8732 Please call the area Designer Steve Garcia at (520) 917-8739, should you have any questions. Sincerely, Henrietta Noriega Office Specialist Design/Build hn Enclosures cc: P. Gehlen, City of Tucson (email letter only) S. Garcia, Tucson Electric Power |
| 06/13/2007 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Approved | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN COMMENTS Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT D07-0023 Cutting Edge Fabrication (XXXX) Tentative Plat ( ) Development Plan (XXXX) Landscape Plan ( ) Revised Plan/Plat ( ) Board of Adjustment ( ) Other CROSS REFERENCE: C9-84-84 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Esmond Station GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: COMMENTS DUE BY: 06/20/07 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: ( ) No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment (XXXX) Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions ( ) RCP Proposal Complies with Plan Policies ( ) See Additional Comments Attached ( ) No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: ( ) Resubmittal Required: ( ) Tentative Plat ( ) Development Plan ( ) Landscape Plan ( ) Other REVIEWER: drcorral 791-4505 DATE: 6/12/07 |
| 06/15/2007 | JOSE ORTIZ | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Denied | June 15, 2007 ACTIVITY NUMBER: D07-0023 PROJECT NAME: Cutting Edge Fabrication PROJECT ADDRESS: 8317 S Camino De Cafe PROJECT REVIEWER: Jose E. Ortiz PE, Traffic Engineer Resubmittal Required: Traffic Engineering does not recommend approval of the Development Plan; therefore a revised Development Plan is required for re-submittal. The following items must be revised or added to the development plan. 1. Include a response letter with the next submittal that states how all comments have been addressed. 2. A permit or a private improvement agreement will be necessary for any work performed within the Right-of-way. Contact Permits and Codes at (520) 791-5100 for permit information. 3. The gate entrance shall remain open during working hours or adequate queuing shall be provided to prevent multiple vehicles from stacking into the public right of way due to the possibility of vehicles not having access through remote operated gate entries. 4. If the gate is to remain open during working hours then a note is needed on the plans stating so. 5. Illustrate the ROW width, and dimension width of paving, curbs, curb cuts and sidewalks. (DS 2-03.2.3.D) 6. The existing sidewalk appears to straddle the right of way/property line. Is this correctly depicted on the development plan? If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-4259 x76730 or Jose.Ortiz@tucsonaz.gov |
| 06/15/2007 | CDRC1 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Approved | CASE: D07-0023, CUTTING EDGE FABRICATION: DEVEL PLAN COMMENT: NO OBJECTIONS OR ADVERSE COMMENTS Trip Generation: Daily: 108 PM Peak: 15 Please call if you have questions Tom Cooney, Travel Forecasting Manager Pima Association of Governments 177 N. Church Ave, #405 Tucson, AZ 85701 Tel: (520) 792-1093, Fax: (520) 620-6981 Web: www.PAGnet.org and www.RTAmobility.com |
| 06/18/2007 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Revise the Native Plant Preservation Plan to include a Native Plant Inventory per DS 2-15.3.1.A. The list shall include the identification number, genus and species, size and ratings for viability and transplantability. 2) Native Plant Viability and Transplantability Status shall be determined for each native plant. A rating for each plant is required. Separate ratings are required for each category. Revise the plant inventory list. DS 2-15.3.2 3) At least thirty (30) percent of each species of Viable Protected Native Plant shall be preserved-in-place or salvaged and transplanted on-site. Revise the plans as necessary to comply. LUC 3.8.3.A.3 4) All Protected Native Plants that require tagging and flagging shall be addressed per DS 2-15.5.0. Revise the notes to correspond with City standards. 5) All Viable Protected Native Plants shall be tagged with an embossed metal, or approved equal, inventory number. Add appropriate notes to the plans. 6) Revise the landscape plan to include the location and purpose of utility easements and other easements. Trees and shrubs are to be selected and located so that, at maturity, they do not interfere with existing on-site or off-site utility service lines or utility easements. Maintain appropriate setbacks from utility installations. LUC 3.7.2.6.B, DS 2-07.2.2.E.1 7) All plant material used for landscaping shall be selected from the Drought Tolerant Plant List in Development Standard 2-16.0. per LUC 3.7.2.2. Abronia villosa is no longer on the list and may only be used in oasis areas as described in LUC 3.7.2.2.C.3 8) Revise the notes for landscape requirements on sheet L-1 to reflect compliance with the current code requirement for canopy trees in vehicular use areas. LUC 3.7.2.3.A.1 9) Refer to table LUC 3.7.2-I for screening requirements applicable to loading areas. Show any required screening and define the loading areas on the landscape plans. RESUBMITTAL OF ALL PLANS IS REQUIRED. |
| 06/21/2007 | ED ABRIGO | PIMA COUNTY | ASSESSOR | Passed | |
| 06/21/2007 | FRODRIG2 | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Approved | >>> Jim Stoyanoff 06/21/2007 2:51 PM >>> No comment |
| 06/21/2007 | PGEHLEN1 | TUCSON WATER NEW AREA DEVELOPMENT | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 06/22/2007 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | DATE: June 21, 2007 TO: DSD_CDRC@ tucsonaz.gov FROM: Glenn Hicks Parks and Recreation 791-4873 ext. 215 Glenn.Hicks@tucsonaz.gov SUBJECT: D07-0023 Cutting Edge Fabrication: Development Plan Review No comments. |
| 06/25/2007 | ANDY VERA | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Sheet C4 detail 5 dumpster enclosure: A. Must provide a 10 ft. inside clear service area between the side wall protectors and between the rear wall protectors and the front gates. DS 6-01.4.1.B & 6-01.4.2.C.2. Recommend a 6 inch minimum separation between the wall and the wall protectors (steel pipes). B. Enclosure gates are not required if compound is screened from public and adjacent business view. However, if gates are installed details will require annotation of "positive locking with (bayonet) anchors for securing gates in the open position during service and when closed. DS 6-01.4.2.C.4 Recommend installing the gates to the face of the CMU wall or post with the ability to open a minimum of 180 degrees. 2. DP demonstrates adequate access and maneuverability within the development and service area. Please make appropriate corrections upon resubmittal. |
| 07/26/2007 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES July 26, 2007 Matthew Hamilton The Built Environment 232 West 4th Street Tucson, Arizona 85705 Subject: D07-0023 Cutting Edge Fabrication Development Plan Dear Matthew: Your submittal of May 23, 2007 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 9 Copies Revised Development Plan (Engineering, Fire, Wastewater, Zoning, Addressing, Traffic, Landscape, ESD, DSD) 4 Copies Revised Landscape Plan (Engineering, Zoning, Landscadpe, DSD) 2 Copies Revised NPPO Plan (Landscape, DSD) 2 Copies Revised Drainage Report (Engineering, DSD) 2 Copies Lot Combo Documents (Zoning, DSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4919. Sincerely, Patricia Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 624-3867 |