Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Permit Number - D07-0021
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 05/15/2007 | MARILYN KALTHOFF | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 05/15/2007 | WILDAN | ZONING | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 05/15/2007 | WILDAN | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 05/15/2007 | WILLDAN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 05/24/2007 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approv-Cond | Sheet DP2-R0 shows red painted curb in some locations. The approved method for marking the Fire Lanes is signs per the Fire Code and the note on the cover sheet of these plans. |
| 05/25/2007 | FRODRIG2 | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | May 25, 2007 To: David Moon, Civil Consultants, Inc. Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department ____________________________________ From: Tom Porter, Sr. CEA (520-740-6579), representing the Pima County Departments of Wastewater Management and Environmental Quality Subject: Park Place Mall Rnovations Development Plan – 1st Submittal D07-0021 The proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. Obtain a letter from the PCWMD's Development Services Section, written within the past 90 days, stating that treatment and conveyance system capacity for the project is available in the downstream public sewerage system and provide a copy of that letter to this office. The required form to request such a letter may be found at: http://www.pima.gov/wwm/forms/docs/CapResponseRequest.pdf. The development plan for this project cannot be approved until a copy of this letter has been received by this office. All Sheets: Add the case number, D07-0021, to the title block of each sheet. This number should be shown larger or bolder than any cross reference numbers. No wastewater review fees will be charged for sheets where this is the only required revision. Sheet DP-1 & S-1: Add the following general note: THIS PROJECT WILL HAVE ______ EXISTING AND______ PROPOSED WASTEWATER FIXTURE UNIT EQUIVALENTS PER TABLE 13.20.045(E)(1) IN PIMA COUNTY CODE 13.20.045(E). And fill in the blanks with the appropriate values. Sheet DP-2 / Sheet 1/Sheet DP5-RO: Show the public and private sewer lines using different line-types, so that they can readily be distinguished from each other. Also show and describe examples of these different line types in the legend on Sheet 1. All sewer elements must be marked as either PUBLIC or PRIVATE and also EXISTING or PROPOSED. Sheet 1: The sewer directional flow arrows should be shown on the sewer lines. Sheet 1: The pipe size/slope/length of pipe between manholes or cleanouts/and pipe material need to be shown clearly on the plan for each proposed sewer segment. Also the manholes need to be marked as private. Sheet 1 & Sheet DP5-RO: All manholes both proposed and existing must be numbered. The proposed manholes should be numbered sequentially lower in number as the sewer goes downstream. Sheet DP5-RO: The sewer directional flow arrows should be shown on the sewer lines. The pipe size/slope/length of pipe between manholes or cleanouts/and pipe material need to be shown clearly on the plan for each proposed sewer segment. Also the manholes need to be marked as private. Sheet DP5-RO: Some of the BCS slopes shown on plan are excessive. DIP will have to be used for the BCS serving the proposed department store. Sheet DP5-RO: The unnumbered manhole at top of page by Macy’s is called out twice. Sheet DP5-RO: Where the 6” BCS connects to 8” sewer a manhole should be installed. Sheet DP-3 to DP-8: All manholes and cleanouts should show rim and invert elevations. Sheet DP-3 to DP-8: The pipe size/slope/length of pipe between manholes or cleanouts/and pipe material need to be shown clearly on the plan for each proposed sewer segment. Also the manholes need to be marked as private. Sheet DP-3 to DP-8: All manholes both proposed and existing must be numbered. The proposed manholes should be numbered sequentially lower in number as the sewer goes downstream. Sheet DP-3: The information for the unnumbered existing manhole near the existing Macy’s store is very hard to read. Please revise. Sheet DP-3: The manhole furthest east is not called out. Sheet DP-3 to DP-4: The public manholes shown on plan need to be marked as public and IMS #,s for each manhole needs to be shown. This office will require a revised set of bluelines, and a response letter, addressing these comments. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. Pima County Code Title 13.20.030.A.2 requires that a wastewater review fee be paid for each submittal of the development plan. The fee for the first submittal is $166 plus $50 per sheet. For the second submittal, the review fee is $100.00 per sheet. For all subsequent submittals, the review fee is $39 per sheet. The next submittal of this project will be the 2nd submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $550.00(made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER) must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. If you have any questions regarding the above mentioned comments, please contact me . |
| 05/25/2007 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Approved | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN COMMENTS Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT D07-0021 Park Place Mall Renovations 5/25/07 () Tentative Plat ( X ) Development Plan () Landscape Plan ( X ) Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other CROSS REFERENCE: C9-06-14, (Development Plan D98-057) NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Broadway-Craycroft GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: Gateway COMMENTS DUE BY: June 6, 2007 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment ( X ) Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies with Plan Policies () See Additional Comments Attached () No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: () Resubmittal Required: () Tentative Plat () Development Plan () Landscape Plan () Other REVIEWER: JBeall 791-4505 DATE: 5/23/07 |
| 05/31/2007 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES May 31, 2007 David Moon Civil Consultants, Inc. 3528 Vann Road, Sutie 105 Birmingham, Al 35235 Subject: D07-0021 Park Place Mall Renovation Development Plan Dear David: Your submittal of May 9, 2007 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 2 Copies Revised Development Plan (Wastewater, DSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 791-5608 extension 1179. Sincerely, Patricia Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: (205) 655-8366 dp-resubmittal |