Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Permit Number - D07-0020
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 05/07/2007 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 05/11/2007 | JOSE ORTIZ | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | |
| 05/21/2007 | PATRICIA GILBERT | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | TO: Patricia Gehlen; CDRC Coordinator DATE: June 15, 2007 SUBJECT: Engineering review of the Commercial building for Mead Investments Development Plan. The activity number is D07-0020. SUMMARY: The Development Plan and Drainage Report were received by Engineering on May 7th,2007. Engineering has reviewed the received items and does not recommend approval of the Development Plan or the Drainage Report. RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: DEVELOPMENT PLAN, DRAINAGE REPORT GENERAL COMMENTS 1. The Drainage Report was reviewed for Development Plan purposes only. 2. A Grading Plan and Permit will be required. Proposed grading in excess of 5,000 yards is designated "engineered grading" and a soils engineering report is required with the Grading Plan submittal. Development Standards 11-01.4.1.C. The Soils Report must also address the requirements detailed in the Standards Manual for Drainage Design and Floodplain Management, SMDDFM, 14.2.6. 3. Proposed developments exceeding 1 acre of disturbance are subject to AzPDES requirements. 4. Proposed fills in excess of two feet above existing grade at any location in the outer one hundred feet of the developing site adjacent to residentially zoned property require the procedure outlined in Development Standards 11-01.8.1. This process must be complete prior to Grading Plan approval. The next submittal must address the following items: DEVELOPMENT PLAN 1. All lettering and dimensions shall be the equivalent of twelve (0.12") point or greater in size. The purpose of this requirement is to assure that all lettering is legible when reviewed and will maintain that legibility when reproduced and photographically reduced (microfilmed) for record-keeping purposes. DS 2-05.2.1.C. 2. Provide the section corners on the location map. DS 2-05.2.5.D.3. 3. Provide the development plan activity number, D07-0020, on the plan in the lower right hand corner of each sheet. DS 2-05.2.2.B.2. 4. Revise general note 5 to read legibly. DS 2-05.2.2.C.1a. 5. Identify in the legend the big bold dashed line found on sheet DP1.1 and DP1.2. DS 2-05.2.1.J. 6. Provide on sheet DP1.1 and DP1.2 site boundary information, including bearing in degrees, minutes, and seconds, with basis for bearing noted, together with distances in feet, to hundredths of a foot. DS 2-05.2.3.A. 7. All easements shall be drawn on the plan. The recordation information, location, width, and purpose of all easements on site will be stated. Blanket easements should be listed in the notes, together with recordation data and their proposed status. Should an easement not be in use and be proposed for vacation or have been abandoned, so indicate. However, should the easement be in conflict with any proposed building location, vacation of the easement is to occur prior to issuance of permits. Revise the plan appropriately. DS 2-05.2.3.B. 8. Remove all hatching from sheet DP1.1 and DP1.2. The hatching clutters the plan and will reduce legibility when reproduced and photographically reduced (microfilmed) for record-keeping purposes. It is clear the hatching is to help identify the new paving, that said for plan clarity leave the verbiage "existing paving," and the leaders that point to the existing paving limits. 9. From the street centerline of Tanque Verde Road dimension the width of the existing paving (front of existing curb) and the existing sidewalk location, if applicable. DS 2-05.2.3.C. 10. Be advised if there is not existing sidewalk within the ROW, sidewalk must be provided. All new development must provide a 6' sidewalk along an arterial street, three feet from back of curb. DS 3-013.3.A., DS 2-05.2.4.L. 11. Provide the recordation data of Tanque Verde Road. DS 2-05.2.3.C. 12. Provide the datum for the ground elevations; indicate City of Tucson field book number and page. DS 2-05.2.3.E. 13. Significant features such as existing walls shall be shown on the plan. Call out any existing walls, with height indicated on the plan. If the wall has wall openings to allow flow to go through show on plan and indicate sizing. DS 2-05.2.3.G. 14. Include on the site plan estimated cut and fill quantities. If cut and fill quantities equal zero, please note on the plan. DS 2-02.2.1.A.17. 15. The minimum width of a one-way PAAL is 12 feet. The plan view shows 11.6'. This does not meet the minimum standards. Revise the plan to meet minimum standards. DS 3-05.2.2.B.4. 16. Clarify on the plan if the one -way lane is for a drive through. If the one-way lane is a drive through lane, provide the required stacking spaces. (See zoning comment number 14. If it is not a drive through lane provide the required 5' pedestrian refuge area with a 4' sidewalk between the structure and the one-way PAAL. DS 2-08.4.1.B., DS 3-05.2.2.B.2. 17. For safety, provide in an appropriate area a "do not enter," sign for the one-way PAAL. 18. Dimension all sidewalks on the plan. The minimum width is 4 feet. DS 2-08.3.1. 19. Detectable warnings (truncated domes) are required at marked crossings (crosswalks). The area covered by the truncated domes shall be twenty-four (24) inch deep and extend the full width of the crosswalk, preceding the crosswalk, including the handicap access aisle. All accessible curb ramps shall have truncated domes installed that shall be twenty-four (24) inches minimum in the direction of travel and extend the full width of the curb ramp or flush surface. The domes shall be located so the edge nearest the curb line is six (6) inches to eight (8) inches from the curb line. Provide a detail on the plan and provide the locations on the plan view. ANSI 406.12, ANSI 705 20. The 10-year flow must be contained under the pedestrian circulation at all down spout locations. On the site plan provide flow arrows, the location of scuppers and roof down spouts. Provide details and add a note, "All roof down spouts on all structures must be routed under any adjacent sidewalk." DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.16, DS 2-08.4.1.E. 21. Label the 75' half ROW, "Future 75' half ROW." DS 2-05.2.4.D.4. 22. From the street centerline of Tanque Verde Road provide a dimension to the future curb and sidewalk location. Label accordingly. DS 2-05.2.4.F. 23. If any new easements are proposed; dimension, indicate whether private or public and the purpose (i.e. electrical, utility). DS 2-05.2.4.G. 24. Show the loading vehicle maneuverability for the required loading space. The minimum requirements for a 30' single unit vehicle is an outside radius of 42' and inside radius of 28'. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. 25. The sight visibility triangles shown on the plan do not have the correct length. For a near side SVT on an arterial road the length is 325' and the far side for an arterial road the length is 125'. Revise the plan accordingly. DS 2-05.2.4.R. 26. In addition to the above comment the keynotes depicting the existing and future SVTs are not shown on the plan view. Provide the appropriate keynote to the correct SVT location. DS 2-05.2.4.R. 27. Indicate a refuse enclosure detail as per D.S. 6-01.4.2. The base shall be a concrete slab with an inside clear dimension of ten (10) feet by ten (10) feet by five (5) inches thick. Steel pipes are required between the container and the enclosure's rear and side walls to prevent the container from damaging the enclosure while being serviced. Enclosure gates have a minimum opening of ten (10) feet. 28. The specific maintenance notes specified in the Standards Manual for Drainage Design and Floodplain Management, SMDDFM, 14.3 must be included on the Development Plan. 29. Provide on the plan the locations of on-site and of-site acceptance points of 100-year discharge points that is found on figure 3, the onsite drainage plan. 30. Revise keynote 4 to read existing 30' Scenic Corridor Buffer. 31. Depending on how each comment has been addressed, additional comments could be forthcoming. DRAINAGE REPORT COMMENTS 1. The 10-year flow must be contained under the pedestrian circulation at all down spout locations. Provide calculations, scupper details and discussion stating that the 10-year flow will be contained under the pedestrian circulation at all concentrated locations with. DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.16 2. The previously submitted drainage report (June 2001) only addressed the detention requirements for basins (watershed areas) for E, F and G. The basins (watershed areas) I and H were not included in the calculations. Provide calculations, discussion and appropriate structural details in the report for the area designated as basins I and H in the previously submitted drainage report. |
| 05/21/2007 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | ADOT HAS NO COMMENT D07-0020 ROBISON ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTS COMMERCIAL BUILDING FOR MEAD INVES -------------------------------------------------------- Confidentiality and Nondisclosure Notice: This email transmission and any attachments are intended for use by the person(s)/entity(ies) named above and may contain confidential/privileged information. Any unauthorized use, disclosure or distribution is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by email, and delete or destroy all copies plus attachments. |
| 05/21/2007 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 05/22/2007 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | 4350 E. Irvington Road, Tucson, AZ 85714 Post Office Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702 WR#181418 May 22, 2007 Mead Investments, Inc. Attn: Ovis Mead 3428 E. Kleindale Tucson, AZ 85716 Dear Ovis Mead: SUBJECT: Commercial Building for Mead Investments, Inc D07-0020 Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the development plan submitted May 14, 2007 It appears that there are no conflicts with the existing facilities within the boundaries of this proposed development. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. In order to apply for electric service, call the New Construction Department at (520) 918-8300. Submit a final set of plans including approved site, offsite and electrical load plans. Include a CD with the AutoCAD version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Your final plans should be sent to: Tucson Electric Power Company Attn: Ms. Mary Boice New Business Project Manager P. O. Box 711 (DB-101) Tucson, AZ 85702 520-917-8732 Please call the area Designer Nancy DiMaria at (520) 918-8267, should you have any questions. Sincerely, Henrietta Noriega Office Specialist Design/Build hn Enclosures cc: |
| 05/22/2007 | TIM ROWE | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | May 22, 2007 To: Jaime DeZubeldia, Olsson Associates Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department ____________________________________ From: Tom Porter, Sr. CEA (520-740-6579), representing the Pima County Departments of Wastewater Management and Environmental Quality Subject: Commercial Building for Mead Investments, Inc. Development Plan – 1st Submittal D07-0020 The proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. Obtain a letter from the PCWMD's Development Services Section, written within the past 90 days, stating that treatment and conveyance system capacity for the project is available in the downstream public sewerage system and provide a copy of that letter to this office. The required form to request such a letter may be found at: http://www.pima.gov/wwm/forms/docs/CapResponseRequest.pdf. The development plan for this project cannot be approved until a copy of this letter has been received by this office. All Sheets: Add the case number, D07-0020, to the title block of each sheet. This number should be shown larger or bolder than any cross reference numbers. No wastewater review fees will be charged for sheets where this is the only required revision. Sheet 1: Add the following general note: THIS PROJECT WILL HAVE ______ EXISTING AND______ PROPOSED WASTEWATER FIXTURE UNIT EQUIVALENTS PER TABLE 13.20.045(E)(1) IN PIMA COUNTY CODE 13.20.045(E). And fill in the blanks with the appropriate values. Sheet 2: Show the public and private sewer lines using different line-types, so that they can readily be distinguished from each other. Also show and describe examples of these different line types in the legend on Sheet 2. All sewer elements must be marked as either PUBLIC or PRIVATE and also EXISTING or PROPOSED. Sheet 2: All public sewer elements (manholes and cleanouts), that are located on this project or are less than 100’ from this project, should be identified. The IMS numbers are the sewer element identification numbers that can be found on the PCWMD Maps and Records (5th floor) basemaps or on PCWMD and PCDOT MapGuide internet websites. Also the sewer plan # for the existing public sewer along Tanque Verde Rd.should be called out and the pipe size included. Sheet 2: In the legend there should be a symbol for cleanouts. The cleanouts on the plan should include the rim and invert elevations. There should be a cleanout a minimum of every 100’ and at all intersections and pipe bends. Sheet 2: The sewer lengths between cleanouts should include the pipe size/length of pipe and the slope. Also there should be sewer directional flow arrows on all sewer line segments. Sheet 4:The existing sewer line pipe size is not clearly marked on the plan. Also the sewer directional flow arrows are missing. Sheet 4: Clearly mark the sewer line easement with width and recordation information for the existing public sewer running across the property. Sheet 4: The last public manhole (furthest east ) needs to be labeled w/IMS # rim and invert elevations. Sheet 4: The two manholes labeled on the plan are both mislabeled. Please revise. Sheet 4: In to remove a section of the public sewer line approval must be granted from PCWMD. Contact Tim Rowe @ (520)740-6547. Sheet 4 & 5: Show all of the BCS connections to the buildings on plan. Show the slope/length/size and pipe material for all BCS. Also show the cleanouts with rim and invert elevations. Sheet 4 & 5: The Keynote 19 should be revised to read as follows: EXISTING SEWER LINE TO BE REMOVED. Sheet: 5: The IMS #’s w/rim and invert elevations for all existing manholes within 100’ of this project need to be shown on plan. The existing manholes at the south end of the project are not labeled. Sheet 5: The terminal sewer line segments marked as 8 and 12 must have a minimum slope of 1%. Please revise. Also the sewer line segments should be labeled as private in the sewer key notes. This office will require a revised set of bluelines, and a response letter, addressing these comments. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. Pima County Code Title 13.20.030.A.2 requires that a wastewater review fee be paid for each submittal of the development plan. The fee for the first submittal is $166 plus $50 per sheet. For the second submittal, the review fee is $50 per sheet. For all subsequent submittals, the review fee is $39 per sheet. The next submittal of this project will be the 2nd submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $150.00(made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER) must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. If you have any questions regarding the above mentioned comments, please contact me . |
| 05/22/2007 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | Congratulations, the Landscape Section recommends approval of the project subject to the following condition: Submit any revised plans for review. |
| 05/22/2007 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: D07-0020 COMMERCIAL BUILDING FOR MEAD INVEST/DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE: 5/22/07 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: Correct Parcel 218-A to 114-51-218A. Delete Building “W” and Building “E” on all sheets. Delete 9201 E. Tanque Verde Road. An address will be assigned to each building upon approval of this project. es |
| 05/23/2007 | FRODRIG2 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Approved | Pima Association Of Governments5/22/07CASE: D07-0020 COMM BLDG FOR MEAD INVES: DEVEL PLANCOMMENT: NO OBJECTIONS OR ADVERSE COMMENTSDescription/ITE CodeUnitsExpectedExpected PM PeakUnitsDaily TripsTrips - TotalTruck Terminal 030AcresGeneral Light Industrial 110TSF GrossMini Warehouse 151TSF GrossSingle Family Homes 210DUApartments 220DUCondo, Townhouse 230DUMobile Home Park 240DUAssisted Living 254DUAll Suites Hotel 311RoomsMotel 320RoomsHealth/Fitness Club 493TSF GrossChurch 560TSF GrossDaycare Center 565TSF GrossGeneral Office 710 (Equation)TSF GrossGeneral Office 710 (Rate)TSF GrossMedical Dental Office 720TSF GrossBuilding Materials/Lumber 812TSF GrossHardware/Paint Store 816TSF GrossNursery (Garden Center) 817TSF GrossShopping Center 820 (Equation)TSF GrossShopping Center 820 (Rate)TSF Gross417215Quality Restaurant 931TSF GrossHigh Turnover/Sit Down Rest. 932TSF Gross338133Fast Food w/o Drive Thru 933TSF GrossFast Food with Drive Thru 934TSF GrossDrive Thru Only 935TSF GrossNot AvailableService Station 944Fuel PositionServ.Station w/ Conven.Mkt 945Fuel PositionTire Store 848Service BaysNot AvailableSupermarket 850TSF GrossConvenien. Mkt (Open 24 hrs) 851TSF GrossConvenien. Mkt (Open 16 Hrs) 852TSF GrossNot AvailableConvenien. Mkt w/ Gas Pumps 853TSF GrossDiscount Club 861TSF GrossPharmacy/Drugstore w/ Drive-thru 881TSF GrossFurniture Store 890TSF GrossWalk-In Bank 911TSF GrossDrive-In Bank 912Drive-In LanesTOTAL55348Expected PM PeakDaily TripsTrips - TotalFor questions please contact:Tom Cooney, Travel Forecasting ManagerPima Association of Governments177 N. Church Ave, #405Tucson, AZ 85701Tel: (520) 792-1093, Fax: (520) 620-6981Web: www.PAGnet.org and www.RTAmobility.comTrip Generation Using Rates From The 7th Edition ITE Trip Generation Report |
| 05/24/2007 | KAROL ARAGONEZ | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Karol Aragonez Planner PROJECT: D07-0020 Commercial Bldg for Mead Investments Development Plan TRANSMITTAL DATE: May 23, 2007 DUE DATE: June 5, 2007 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is May 6, 2008. 2. All lettering and dimensions shall be the equivalent of twelve (0.12") point or greater in size. DS 2-05.2.1.C 3. Within the location map please identify section corners. DS 2-05.2.1.D.3 4. The legal description provided in the title block is to include the township, range, and section and abbreviations are to be written out. 5. Please include the contour interval with the north arrow on all applicable sheets of the development plan. DS 2-05.2.1.H 6. Case number D07-0020 has been assigned to this development plan (DP). Please place this number in the right corner of all sheets of the development plan, landscape plan, NPPO, and any other associated sheets. DS 2-05.2.2.B.2 7. Within the Code Review Sec. please correct the proposed use. Remove Food and Beverage Sales and replace with Food Service, Subject to 3.5.4.6.A. & C. Please clarify how much square footage is to be allocated to the different uses identified. Will the 4,000 sq. ft. building be half office and half retail or are tenants unknown at this time? DS 2-05.2.2.B.3 8. Provide a separate response letter detailing compliance with rezoning conditions. DS 2-05.2.2.B.6 & DS 2-05.2.4.U 9. Please draw all existing easements on the plan along with recordation information, location, width, and purpose. If an easement is no longer in use and scheduled to be vacated or has been abandoned, so indicate. If none exist provide response to reviewer's comments. Also if easements are purposed please draw, dimension and label as to their purpose and whether they will be public or private. If none exist provide response to reviewer's comments. DS 2-05.2.3.B & DS 2-05.2.4.G 10. Please provide the recordation data, type and dimensioned width of existing paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks within Tanque Verde Road. DS 2-05.2.3.C 11. Please provide the existing zoning designation on and adjacent to the project site including across Tanque Verde Road. Immediately north, east, and west is C-1, across Tanque Verde Road is R-1. Further to the east is R-3. DS 2-05.2.4.B 12. Please dimension the existing paved drive north of the proposed buildings. This drive must be a minimum of twenty-four (24) feet wide to access new ninety (90) degree parking spaces. Also dimension the drive east of the proposed buildings. This drive must also be a minimum of twenty-four (24) feet wide to provide two-way access. DS 3-05.2.1.C.1 & DS 3-05.6.0 Table 1 13. The one-way PAAL on the west side must be a minimum width of twelve (12) feet. Please revise. DS 3-05.2.1.C.1 14. Please clarify if the one-way PAAL is intended as a drive-through lane for the restaurant. If intended as a drive-through lane DS 3-05.2.1.C.2 must be demonstrated providing stacking area and capacity, minimum width and setbacks as required by DS 3-05.2.2.B.4. If not a drive-through lane, a minimum distance of five (5) feet for a pedestrian refuge area must be maintained between any enclosed structure and a PAAL. Within this refuge area a minimum four (4) foot sidewalk that is physically separate from the vehicle travel lane is to be provided. Please provide on the west side of the proposed restaurant building adjacent to the one-way PAAL. DS 3-05.2.2.B.2 & DS 2-08.4.1.B 15. Please dimension proposed wheel-stop curbing. When wheel stop curbing is used, it is to be located two and one-half (2 1/2) feet from the front of the parking space. DS 3-05.2.3.C.2 16. Signage indicating "no entry" into the one-way PAAL must be posted along with directional signage for the PAAL. 17. Please provide the width of the parking space (space 39) abutting the trash enclosure. When a parking space abuts a vertical barrier over six (6) inches, in height, the required width for the space is ten (10) feet to provide extra width to allow passengers to enter and exit their vehicles. DS 3-05.2.1.B.3 18. Please label and dimension the future MS&R curb location within Tanque Verde Road. DS 2-05.2.4.G 19. Please provide dimensions from the edge of the buildings to the adjacent property lines north, east, and west. Dimension the buildings from the future right-of-way line in Tanque Verde Road. The minimum setback from Tanque Verde Road is three (3) times the height of the proposed buildings (52 feet). LUC 3.2.6.4 Perimeter Yard Indicator DD & LUC 2.8.2.5.A 20. All accessible pedestrian routes shall consist of a walking surface with a slope not steeper than 1:20. The cross slope of a walking surface shall not be steeper than 1:48. All slopes are to be indicated on the plan/plat and associated details. ANSI 403.3 21. A pedestrian path (4 ft. sidewalk) is required between parking spaces 51 and 52 and the proposed buildings. The areas within a development that must be connected by a pedestrian path include all motor vehicle parking areas. The path cannot cross behind the dumpster maneuvering area but placed to the west of the dumpster for a safe crossing. The crossing shall include required handicap ramps on either side of crosswalk. DS 2-08.3.1 22. Please dimension all sidewalks within site. Minimum width for sidewalks is four (4) feet and meets all requirements per Development Standard 2-08.5.1. DS 2-08.5.1. All sidewalks are to be flood free for all storm discharges of up to ten (10) year flood event. Sidewalks are to a minimum of four (4) feet wide and be installed to avoid any obstruction which decreases the minimum width to less than four (4) feet. The cross slope on all sidewalks will not exceed two (2) percent and is to be noted on the plan. DS 2-08.4.1.B, DS 2-08.5.1.A & D 23. Please provide details of proposed handicap access ramps used within the project site and right-of-way. Curb ramps shall be a minimum of three (3) feet in width, exclusive of flared sides. The curb ramp flares shall not be steeper than 1:10. Counter slopes of adjoining gutters and road surfaces immediately adjacent to the curb ramp shall not be steeper than 1:20. The adjacent surfaces at transitions at curb ramps to walks, gutters and streets shall be at the same level. All slopes are to be indicated on the plan/plat and associated details. ANSI 406.2, 3, & 4 Detectable warnings (truncated domes) are required at marked crossings (crosswalks). The area covered by the truncated domes shall be twenty-four (24) inch deep and extend the full width of the crosswalk, preceding the crosswalk, including access aisles of handicapped motor vehicle parking spaces. The domes shall be located so the edge nearest the curb line is six (6) inches to eight (8) inches from the curb line. ANSI 406.12, ANSI 705 24. On projects with more than one (1) building, loading spaces shall be provided for each building, based on the number of spaces required for the uses within each building. If more than one (1) use is located within the building, the loading space for each principal use shall be located in close proximity to the service entrance of the use it serves. Per this requirement at least one (1) additional loading space with possibly two (2) being required to service building W. This additional space would be a minimum of twelve (12) feet wide by thirty-five (35) feet long per LUC 3.4.5.3 and LUC 3.4.5.5. LUC 3.4.4.1.B.2 25. Please demonstrate maneuverability for all proposed off-street loading spaces on site. The size of the maneuvering area shall be based on national standards for turning radii required of the vehicle for which the space is designed. LUC 3.4.4.2.C 26. Please provide a typical parking detail for both standard and handicap parking spaces. DS 2-05.2.4.P 27. Please provide a copy of the cross access agreement between this site and the self-storage units and businesses to the west. 28. Because Administrative and Professional Office requires that seventy-five (75) percent of the required eight (8) percent of bicycle parking be Class 1 the bicycle parking calculation needs to be revised requiring a total of five (5) spaces, three (3) Class 1 and two (2) Class 2. Correct parking requirements and Code Review note 6c. LUC 3.3.4 29. Please provide a plan view detail of the proposed class 2 bicycle parking spaces. Single rack spaces placed in a row will allow a minimum of seventy -two (72) inch length per bicycle parking space and a minimum of thirty (30) inches between spaces of racks. A five (5) foot wide access aisle measured from the front or rear of the seventy-two (72) inch long parking space will be provided beside each row. Lighting will be provided such that all facilities are thoroughly illuminated and visible from adjacent sidewalks, parking lots, or buildings, during working hours. The surface of the facility can be surfaced the same as for motor vehicle parking or with a minimum of one (1) inch thickness of one-fourth (1/4) inch aggregate material. DS 2-09.5.1, DS2-09.5.2, DS 2-09.5.4, & DS 2-09.6.2 30. Bicycle parking provided on the DP does not meet the requirements of revised DS (Development Standard) 2-09. Per DS 2-09.4.1 Class 2 bicycle parking facilities will be located no more than fifty (50) feet from the main building entrance(s) and will be along the front side of the building as well as along other sides of the building that has an entrance. Bicycle access through the development will be separate from the pedestrian ways. Vehicular access may be used as bicycle access. Bicycle access to a parking facility may cross a pedestrian way at a right angle (DS2-09.3.2). Please refer to DS 2-09.8.0 Figures 1-7 for acceptable and unacceptable bike racks, Figure 8 for rack location, and Figure 9 for dimensional requirements. 31. Please indicate the location and type of postal service to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements. If mail is to be delivered to an area within a building please state so on the plan. DS 2-05.2.4.V 32. Indicate the locations and types of proposed signs (wall, freestanding, pedestal) to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements and that minimal locational requirements can be met. Also indicate if there are existing billboards on site. Billboards will be required to meet all LUC requirements as stated in LUC Sec. 3.5.4.26. If none exists please state so. DS 2-05.2.4.W & LUC 3.5.4.26 33. Please correct general note 4 and 5. The notes overlap making it difficult to read. 34. Please provide a copy of SCZ 01-07 to verify if this parcel was included in that review. If not a separate Special Application, review, and approval for the SCZ overlay is required. For more information the applicant must contact Patricia Gehlen at 791-5608 ext. 1179. The application form is on the DSD website at http://www.tucsonaz.gov/dsd/Forms_Fees___Maps/Applications/Overlay_Zone_Application.pdf SCZ Specific Comments 35. If required the new Overlay Zone case number must be noted in the lower right corner of each sheet of the tentative plat, landscape, and NPPO plans. All required elements of the SCZ (i.e. 30 foot buffer, view corridors, approved colors, etc.) as shown on the approved Overlay Zone plan must be added to the tentative plat, along with date of approval and any conditions placed on that approval. The tentative plat may not be approved prior to Overlay Zone application approval. (LUC 2.8.2) (LUC 2.8.1) (D.S. 2-12) (D.S. 9-04) 36. Please relabel keynote 4 as "30 foot undisturbed natural buffer to be preserved and maintained in it's natural state". 37. Please add and/or label the four hundred (400) foot SCZ corridor boundary to plat. 38. Please add the appropriate following notes to the tentative, development, or site plan plat. a) This development is subject to the review and approval of the special application for the Scenic Corridor Overlay. The Special application case number is (add case number). The special application has been reviewed and approved, approval date (add date). If there are conditions of approval then add to note. b) Maximum height of structures will be 1/3 the distance of the structure from the future right-of-way of Tanque Verde Road, not to exceed 30 feet. c) No grading beyond that is necessary for siting of buildings, drives, private yards, and structural improvements. All viable vegetation with a caliper of 4 inches or greater and all saguaro cacti will be preserved or relocated on the site per the Native Plant and Preservation Ordinance. d) Drainageways are to be maintained in their natural state. e) All new utilities for development on private property or public right-of-way along Tanque Verde Road will be underground. Trenching is permitted for the placement of utilities lines, if area is revegetated in accordance with Land Use Code Sec. 3.7.5.2.D f) Building or structure surfaces, which are visible from Tanque Verde Road will have natural earth tone colors, which are, predominate within the surrounding landscape. (Please note when using this note a color matrix is not required. It is suggested that specific color designations be removed from the tentative plat and overlay review plan unless SCZ-01-07 applies and has a color and material chart.) g) Fencing and freestanding walls facing Tanque Verde Road will meet material restrictions in Land Use Code Sec. 3.7.3, Screening Requirements. h) All areas between the MS & R right-of-way line and the existing street right-of-way that are disturbed by development shall be revegetated with native vegetation. i) All disturbed areas on the site that are visible from Tanque Verde Road and are not covered by permanent improvements shall be revegetated with native plants, plants from the Drought Tolerant Plant List, or a combination of both. j) Exposed cut and fill slopes shall be no greater than 1-foot rise or fall over a 3-foot length. 39. Regulations for signs are stipulated in Sec. 3-32, Scenic Route District, of Chapter 3, Advertising and Outdoor Signs, of the Tucson Code, and further supplemented by the following: a) On any conflicts in requirements between the LUC and Sec. 3-32, the more strict of the two prevails. b) Signs are to use colors, which are predominant within the surrounding landscape, such as desert and earth tones. c) No commercial advertising sign, except a sign pertaining to a use conducted on the premises or a sign advertising the sale or lease of the property upon which the sign is located, and no billboard shall be erected within four hundred (400) feet of the right-of-way line on any street or route designated "scenic". If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Karol Aragonez, (520) 791-5550, ext. 74960. KAA S:\zoning review\karol\planning\cdrc\developmentplan\D07-0020dp.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development plan and additional requested documents. |
| 05/25/2007 | ANDY VERA | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Denied | 1. One enclosure not sufficient for (2) separate buildings. Restaurant should have their own container due to food waste. Clarify if owner and/or property mgt will be managing waste removal of responsibility of individual tenants/bussiness owners. Recommend constructing a double wide refuse enclosure to accomodate for two dumpsters or add and additional single enclosure on site elsewhere. 2. No refuse enclosure detail provided. Refer to DS 6-01.4.0. A. Ensure enclosure is designed so provides a 10ft inside clear area between the side wall protectors and between the rear wall protectors and the front gates. DS 6-01.4.1.B & 6-01.4.2.C.2. Recommend mounting gates to the face of CMU wall or post so they do not encroach within the required clear area. Also, when at all possible, construct gates so they open a minimum of 180 degrees. B. Ensure gates are designed with the ability to secure in the open position during service. DS 6-01.4.2.C.4. Please make all corrections upon resubmittal. |
| 06/05/2007 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | DATE: June 5, 2007 TO: DSD_CDRC@ tucsonaz.gov FROM: Glenn Hicks Parks and Recreation 791-4873 ext. 215 Glenn.Hicks@tucsonaz.gov SUBJECT: D07-0020 Commercial Bldg for Mead Invest: Development Plan(5-7-07) Staff has no comments. |
| 06/06/2007 | PGEHLEN1 | TUCSON WATER NEW AREA DEVELOPMENT | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 06/06/2007 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Approved | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN COMMENTS Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT D07-0020 Commercial Buldg for Mead Invest. 06/06/07 () Tentative Plat (XXXX) Development Plan (XXXX) Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other CROSS REFERENCE: Annexation Ordinance 6090 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Bear Canyon Neighborhood Plan GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: Tanque Verde Road (Scenic) COMMENTS DUE BY: 6/05/07 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment (XXXX) Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies with Plan Policies () See Additional Comments Attached () No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: () Resubmittal Required: () Tentative Plat () Development Plan () Landscape Plan () Other REVIEWER: drcorral 791-4505 DATE: 06/04/07 |
| 06/06/2007 | FRODRIG2 | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Approved | No comment |
| 06/07/2007 | ED ABRIGO | PIMA COUNTY | ASSESSOR | Passed | |
| 06/07/2007 | ROBERT YOUNG | PIMA COUNTY | PIMA CTY - DEV REVIEW | Passed | |
| 06/19/2007 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES June 19, 2007 Sam H. Robison, Architect Robison Associates Architects 759 West Panorama Road Tucson, Arizona 85704 Subject: D07-0020 Commercial Building for Mead Investments, Inc. Development Plan Dear Sam: Your submittal of May 7, 2007 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 6 Copies Revised Development Plan (Engineering, Wastewater, Addressing, Zoning, ESD, DSD) 3 Copies Revised Landscape Plan (Engineering, Zoning, DSD) 2 Copies Revised Drainage Report (Engineering, DSD) 2 Copies Cross Access Agreement (Zoning, DSD) 2 Copies SCZ 01-07 (Zoning, DSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 791-5608 extension 1179. Sincerely, Patricia Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 742-1285 |