Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - DEV PLAN
Permit Number - D07-0019
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - DEV PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 09/07/2007 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 09/10/2007 | CDRC1 | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | September 5, 2007 To: Jaime DeZubeldia, Olsson Associates Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department ____________________________________ From: Tom Porter, Sr. CEA (520-740-6579), representing the Pima County Departments of Wastewater Management and Environmental Quality Subject: The Lofts at Dorado Country Club Tentative Plat/Development Plan – 2nd Submittal D07-0019 The proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. Obtain a letter from the PCWMD's Development Services Section, written within the past 90 days, stating that treatment and conveyance system capacity for the project is available in the downstream public sewerage system and provide a copy of that letter to this office. The required form to request such a letter may be found at: http://www.pima.gov/wwm/forms/docs/CapResponseRequest.pdf. The development plan for this project cannot be approved until a copy of this letter has been received by this office. Not received in this submittal. Sheet 6: The existing sewer line pipe size and plan# are not clearly marked on the plan. The existing sewer line should be clearly marked as public. Also the existing sewer directional flow arrows are missing. Sheet 6: Clearly mark the sewer line easement with width and recordation information for the existing public sewer running across the property and adjacent property. Sheet 6: The IMS #’s shown for both existing public manholes on plan are identical. This is not possible since every public manhole has its own IMS#, please revise. Sheet 6: Show the easement recordation information for all public sewer easements. Also clearly point out the portion of sewer line to be abandoned and note that the easement will be released by separate instrument. Per Tim Rowe’s advice the process of abandonment with Pima County Real Property should begin as soon as possible. Sheet 6 and 7: Wherever the 6” BCS connects to the 8” main line a manhole should be proposed. This office will require a revised set of bluelines, and a response letter, addressing these comments. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. Pima County Code Title 13.20.030.A.2 requires that a wastewater review fee be paid for each submittal of the development plan. The fee for the first submittal is $166 plus $50 per sheet. For the second submittal, the review fee is $50 per sheet. For all subsequent submittals, the review fee is $39 per sheet. The next submittal of this project will be the 3rd submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $78.00(made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER) must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. If you have any questions regarding the above mentioned comments, please contact me . |
| 09/25/2007 | KAROL ARAGONEZ | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Karol Aragonez Planner PROJECT: D07-0019 The Lofts at Dorado Country Club Development Plan TRANSMITTAL DATE: September 21, 2007 DUE DATE: October 5, 2007 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. Within the location map please label the Rosehill Wash. DS 2-05.2.1.D.1 & 2 2. Please include the contour interval with the north arrow on all applicable pages of the development plan. DS 2-05.2.1.H 3. Please correct provided parking calculations. Totals provided under provided parking, garage and surface parking (562), and what is actually shown in plan (555) view does not match. Total number of garage spaces is three hundred and seventy-seven (377), surface parking totals one hundred and seventy-eight (178). The total will affect the bicycle parking calculations (44 required). 4. Please provide detail of handicap access ramp used for crossing PAALs. Curb ramps shall be a minimum of three (3) feet in width, exclusive of flared sides. The curb ramp flares shall not be steeper than 1:10. Counter slopes of adjoining gutters and road surfaces immediately adjacent to the curb ramp shall not be steeper than 1:20. The adjacent surfaces at transitions at curb ramps to walks, gutters and streets shall be at the same level. All slopes are to be indicated on the plan/plat and associated details. ANSI 406.2, 3, & 4 All accessible curb ramps shall have truncated domes installed that shall be twenty-four (24) inches minimum in the direction of travel and extend the full width of the curb ramp. The domes shall be located so the edge nearest the curb line is six (6) inches to eight (8) inches from the curb line. ANSI 406.12, ANSI 705 5. Please list the GFA of the Golf Clubhouse/Restaurant and Residence Clubhouse within the building footprint. 6. Class 2 bicycle parking facilities will be located no more than fifty (50) feet from the main building entrance(s) and will be along the front side of the building as well as along other sides of the building that has an entrance. 7. The type of rack proposed does not provide two-point support for bicycles. See DS 2-09.8.0 Figures 2-7 for acceptable and unacceptable rack types. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Karol Aragonez, (520) 837-4960. KAA S:\zoning review\karol\planning\cdrc\developmentplan\D07-0019dpr.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development plan and additional requested documents. |
| 09/28/2007 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Denied | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN COMMENTS Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT D07-0019 The Lofts at Dorado Country Club () Tentative Plat/Development Plan ( ) Development Plan () Landscape Plan ( ) Revised Plan/Plat ( ) Board of Adjustment () Other – Color Elevations CROSS REFERENCE: C9-06-21 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: General Plan GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: N/A COMMENTS DUE BY: October 5, 2007 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: ( ) No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment ( ) Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions ( ) RCP Proposal Complies with Plan Policies () See Additional Comments Attached ( ) No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: () Resubmittal Required: () Tentative Plat/Development Plan – wall detail included ( ) Development Plan ( ) Landscape Plan ( ) Other REVIEWER: J. Hershenhorn 791-4505 DATE: 9/27/07 Lofts at Dorado Country Club D07-0019 All of my previous review comments have been addressed, with the exception of the following: Leaving the existing screen wall along Speedway does not satisfy rezoning condition 17. Although it is an existing screen wall, it is considered part of the new development. Since it is visible from Speedway, it needs to be graffiti-resistant, and incorporate one or more visually interesting design treatments. It also needs to be architecturally consistent with the rest of the new development. Please provide a decorative wall detail on the development plan. The detail should include a label that the wall will be constructed of or painted with graffiti-resistant materials. |
| 09/28/2007 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: D07-0019 THE LOFTS AT DORADO COUNTRY CLUB/REVISED DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE: September 28, 2007 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: Condominium Units have been labeled as Apartment Units, please correct to the Condo format (see Address Standards below). ADDRESS STANDARDS 18.83.040 Condominiums: a) Condominium developments shall be assigned a situs address for each building. b) Individual living facilities in each building shall be assigned occupant identifiers (unit numbers): First floor units shall have 100 series numbers, second floor units shall have 200 series numbers, and additional floors shall be numbered accordingly. jg |
| 10/01/2007 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Add the Wash Overlay related case numbers to the landscape and native plant preservation plans. DS 2-07.2.1.B The WASH application is required to be approved prior to the Development Plan. 2) Revise the development plan and the Environmental Resource Report to include the same floodplain information, including the location of the 100-year flood limits for all flows of one hundred (100) cfs or more with 100-year flood water surface elevations. The plans currently do not show the same floodplain limits. 3) Ownership of the Protected Riparian Area shall be provided in one or more of the methods set forth in DS 2-13.2.6 to insure continued preservation of the area. Refer to the standards and revise the plans and provide additional documentation as appropriate. A conservation easement or similar instrument is required. 4) Revise the Development Plan to identify and delineate the new Protected Riparian Area (preservation and mitigation areas).This area should at least cover the mitigation areas within the WASH study area and drainage easement. Revise the plans as necessary. TCC 23A-51.2 5) Revise the native plant preservation plans to show the limits of grading/disturbance and identify preserved areas on the site. It is assumed that grading to create the new bank protection will be required. Show the limits accurately DS 2-15.3.4.A 6) The proposed vehicular use areas are required to be screened from adjacent parcels along the north and west sides of the site per LUC Table 3.7.2-I. Per LUC 3.7.3.6.D a partial exception may be granted if there is extensive landscape open space in conjunction with screening designs as required by the conditions of rezoning. Add plants in conjunction with the proposed water harvesting areas to provide enhanced screening. The east side qualifies for a partial exception per LUC 3.7.3.6.D. 7) Revise the development and landscape plan to indicate same screening treatment for the east side parking spaces. DS 2-07.2.0 8) Correct the Total Mitigation calculations for Prosopis velutina on NPPP 3. It appear that 35 is the minimum mitgation requirement. 9) Note the WASH Overlay case number and date of approval on the Development Plan (Gen. Note 32) |
| 10/02/2007 | JOSE ORTIZ | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | |
| 10/04/2007 | ANDY VERA | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Denied | 1. DP sheet 3, trash enclosure at sotuheast side of development does not provide adequate maneuverability to approach enclosure. DS 6-01.4.1.C. Service vehicle needs to be perpendicular to the enclosure at 10 ft. in front of the enclosure. Recommend positioning enclosure clockwise at a 30 degree angle or back 5 ft. to allow for adequate approach. 2. Identify all trash enclosures on DP. Appears to show a total of 3 single enclosures and 1 double enclosure. Clarify. 3. Sheet 7, Clarify cleanouts within trash enclosures (assuming they are trash enclosures since no keynote designation) shown on sewer plan. Single enclosures at southeast and southwest side of complex. 4. Sheet 10, trash enclosure detail. As mentioned in previous submittal comments, the enclosure gates must be equipped with the ability to be secured in the open and closed positions per DS 6-01.4.2.C.4. Show within detail and annotate appropriate anchors/cane bolts and sleeves flush with concrete for securing gates at minimum 12 ft opening. Recommend designing gates to open 180 degrees. Please correct on resubmittal. |
| 11/06/2007 | BIANCA RAMIREZ | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: November 6, 2007 SUBJECT: The Lofts at Dorado Country Club TO: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC/Zoning Manager LOCATION: 3301 E Speedway, T14S R15E Sec 6, Ward 2 REVIEWER: Bianca Ramirez, CFM ACTIVITY: D07-0019 (2nd Review) RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Revised Tentative Plat / Development Plan (Second Review) and Drainage Report (1st Review). The Tentative Plat / Development Plan have been reviewed by the Engineering Division and we do not recommend approval at this time. The following review comments must be addressed prior to approval: Tentative Plat / Development Plan: 1. Clarify the status of the existing utility easements. Abandoned easements acknowledged - clearly indicate where abandoned easements end. Provide recordation abandonment. Abandonment easement should not appear on final plat. 2. Modification of keynotes 2 and 5 acknowledged - Indication of truncated domes noted for all curb access ramps. Verify keynote 2 references correct SD - SD 203 noted. SD 203 is for concrete sidewalk new to existing connection. 3. Revise the typical street sections to provide 5 foot sidewalks along each proposed street. Clarify whether the sections are for streets or for PAALs. Four foot sidewalks are acceptable along PAALs. 4. Delineate the existing and proposed floodplains on the tentative plat/development plan. Acknowledge that FEMA 100-year floodplain has been added to sheets 5,8 and 9. Add FEMA 100-year floodplain to sheet 6t. Note that FEMA water surface elevations will be used to establish finish floor elevations until a letter of map revision is issued. The current FIRM indicates a water surface elevation of 2539 ft NGVD29 just north of Speedway. Provide datum used for finished floor elevations provided. 5. Show how a sediment trap is incorporated into the design of the retention/detention basin. Sediment trap acknowledged - provide detail illustrating that minimum sediment trap criteria has been met per Stormwater Retention/Detention Manual 3.4.2 Methods for Control of Sedimentation. 6. Show the proposed path on the tentative plat/development plan. The delineation of the path on the landscape plan seems to indicate that the path will enter the wash. 7. There are significant issues that remain to be decided as part of the WASH review. Additional comments may be forthcoming once the overlay issues have been resolved. 8. Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan will be required with grading permit submittal. Drainage Report: 1. Sec. 29-15(1).a: The location of the 100-year floodplain on, adjacent to, and a minimum of two hundred feet upstream and downstream of the proposed development. 2. Label Figures in Drainage Report. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 520.837.4928 or Bianca.Ramirez@tucsonaz.gov . Bianca C. Ramirez Engineering Associate City of Tucson/Development Services Department 201 N. Stone Avenue P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210 (520) 791-5550 x1193 office (520) 879-8010 fax |
| 11/07/2007 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES November 7, 2007 Jaime M. DeZubeldia Olsson Associates 3025 West Ina Road Tucson, Arizona 85741-2107 Subject: D07-019 Lofts @ Dorado Country Club Development Plan Dear Jamie: Your submittal of September 7, 2007 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 8 Copies Revised Development Plan (Zoning, Wastewater, Engineering, ESD, Landscape, DUPD, Addressing, DSD) 5 Copies Revised Landscape Plan (Zoning, Engineering, Landscape, DUPD, DSD) 2 Copies Revised NPPO Plan (Landscape, DSD) 2 Copies Revised Drainage Report (Engineering, DSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4919. Sincerely, Patricia Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 777-6728 |