Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - DEV PLAN
Permit Number - D07-0017
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - DEV PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 07/24/2007 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 07/25/2007 | FRODRIG2 | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Approv-Cond | July 25, 2007 To: Bruce Paton, P.E. Rick Engineering Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department ____________________________________ From: Tom Porter, Sr. Civil Eng. Assistant (520-740-6706), representing the Pima County Departments of Wastewater Management and Environmental Quality Subject: Tentative Plat/Development Plan Puente Nuevo Plaza 2nd Submittal, D07-017 The proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. Sheet 6: The manhole#1 is now located outside of the property. Why is there a proposed 10’ x 20’ sewer easement still shown on plan? Sheet 6: Revise the plan to show the sewer flow direction over each segment of all existing sewers. Sheet 6: 6-inch BCSs connecting directly to an 8-inch line are not allowed (4-inch BCS is okay). However if the plan requires 6” BCSs, they have to connect through a manhole on the proposed 8” private sewer (see comments Nos.14-20). Revise the plan to agree with such requirements. This is the 2nd request. Subject to the above, the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality and Wastewater Management Department hereby approve the above referenced submittal of the tentative or preliminary plat. The required revision(s) may be shown on the Mylars. Please note the following: Approval of the above referenced submittal does not authorize the construction of public or private sewer collection lines, or water distribution lines. Prior to the construction of such features, a Construction Authorization (Approval To Construct) may need to be obtained from the Pima County Environmental Quality. Also, air quality activity permits must be secured by the developer or prime contractor from the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality before constructing, operating or engaging in an activity which may cause or contribute to air pollution. If you have any questions regarding the above mentioned comments, please do not hesitate to contact me. CC: Project file |
| 08/07/2007 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Approved | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: D07-0017 PUENTE NUEVO PLAZA/REVISED DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE: 8/07/07 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and we hereby approve this project. Submit a 24 x 36 Reverse Reading Double Matte Photo Mylar of approved Development Plan to City Planning. Signed and dated Mylar will be forwarded to Pima County Addressing prior to assignment of addresses. 2.) All addresses will need to be displayed per Pima County Address Standards at the time of final inspection. ES |
| 08/08/2007 | KAROL ARAGONEZ | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Karol Aragonez Planner PROJECT: D07-0017 Puente Nuevo Plaza Development Plan Resubmittal TRANSMITTAL DATE: August 3, 2007 DUE DATE: August 21, 2007 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. Please provide the contour interval with the north arrow on all applicable sheets (3-7) of the development plan. DS 2-05.2.1.H 2. Please dimension Qwest easement on sheet 3 of 8. 3. A five (5) foot wide pedestrian refuge must be maintained between a PAAL and building. This refuge area will also include a four (4) foot wide sidewalk and be physically separated from the PAAL with a vertical curb. This is required between the west side of building 4 and the entrance PAAL. DS 3-05.2.2.B.1 & DS 2-08.4.1.B 4. Please show the end of the sidewalk along the north side of building 1 at the Alvernon Entrance. 5. Previous Comment: The placement of dumpsters and off-street loading that require access and maneuvering within the main entrances from Alvernon Way and Ft. Lowell would appear to create an unsafe situation for pedestrians using the crosswalks placed behind these areas and for incoming traffic where trucks would potentially block access into and out of the project site. Please verify with Engineering and Environmental Services if the placement meets their standards. This comment remain until revised refuse layout is approved by Environmental Services and Engineering. 6. Please add to proposed use under medical service that Rehabilitation and physical therapy are not permitted. 2003 IBC Sec. 1106.4 7. Per DS 2-09.4.1 Class 2 bicycle parking facilities will be located no more than fifty (50) feet from the main building entrance(s) and will be along the front side of the building as well as along other sides of the building that has an entrance. The size and configuration of the buildings would suggest multiple suites and with different entrances. Please provide rough location of all entrances to separate suites and provide Class 2 parking accordingly. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Karol Aragonez, (520) 837-4960. KAA S:\zoning review\karol\planning\cdrc\developmentplan\D07-0017dpr.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development plan and additional requested documents. |
| 08/10/2007 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | The following changes are required on the mylars. Resubmittal not required if no other revisions are made to the development plans. 1) Section I on sheet 2 of the Develoment plan does not appear to accomodate the landscaping proposed on sheet 3 of the landscape plan. Provide detail(s) for landscape plantings proposed along the northern part of the site in the drainage ditch. DS 2-07.2.2.D 2) Identify the location(s) where Section L on sheet 2 of the development plan applies. |
| 08/21/2007 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Approved | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN COMMENTS Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT D07-0017 Puente Nuevo Plaza 08/20/07 () Tentative Plat (X) Development Plan (X) Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other CROSS REFERENCE: C9-06-31 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Northside Area Plan GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: NO COMMENTS DUE BY: August 21, 2007 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment () Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies with Plan Policies () See Additional Comments Attached (X) No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: 5/15/07 REVIEWER: msp 791-4505 DATE: August 17, 2007 |
| 08/22/2007 | FRODRIG2 | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Approv-Cond | Alvernon Wash is shown on the plans as Pima County owned. It is not. This is a City owned wash and the bridge crossing at the north/west corner of the development on to Alvernon Way will need to be processed as a Bridge Easement. We will process this request under the file RES 2008-004. By City Policy the Real Estate Division will have to sell this easement to the developer. The Alternate Sales Policy will be used to value this easement and the value will be based on the Pima County Assessors land values for parcel 110-03-081C. Please submit to the Real Estate Division a legal description and sketch of the area of the bridge structure. Please include the square footage of the foot print of the bridge structure. |
| 08/22/2007 | FRODRIG2 | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Approv-Cond | Conditional approval upon recordation of the bridge easement. |
| 08/23/2007 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | DATE: September 11, 2007 To: Patricia Gehlen CDRC/Zoning Manager FROM: Loren Makus, EIT Engineering Division SUBJECT: Puente Nuevo Plaza Development Plan D07-0017 (Second Review) T13S, R14E, Section 27 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: None The development plan has been reviewed by the Engineering Division and we recommend approval at this time. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 520.837.4927 or loren.makus@tucsonaz.gov. Loren Makus, EIT Senior Engineering Associate |
| 08/23/2007 | JOSE ORTIZ | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | |
| 08/24/2007 | ANDY VERA | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Does not have a sufficient number of enclsoures to adequately service development. Recommend replacing the enclosure at the SW corner of bldg 3 as shown on previous drawing. Also, add an additonal refuse enclosure to the NE corner of development by bldg 3. Please correct on resubmittal. |
| 09/13/2007 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES September 13, 2007 Tri Miller Rick Engineering Company, Inc. 1745 East River Road, Suite 101 Tucson, Arizona 85718 Subject: D07-0017 Puente Nuevo Plaza Development Plan Dear Tri: Your submittal of July 24, 2007 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 6 Copies Revised Development Plan (Zoning, Landscape, Real Estate, ESD, Wastewater, DSD) 3 Copies Revised Landscape Plan (Zoning, Landscape, DSD) DUE TO THE COMPLEXITY OF SEVERAL OF THE "CONDITIONAL APPROVALS", AN ADDITIONAL SUBMITTAL IS REQUESTED. Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4919. Sincerely, Patricia Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 322-6956 dp-resubmittal |