Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Permit Number - D07-0017
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 04/18/2007 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 04/20/2007 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 04/23/2007 | DBELL1 | LANDFILL | ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES | Approved | Greater than 500 feet from the landfill |
| 04/27/2007 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | ADOT has NO COMMENT D07-0017 Rick Engineering Company, Inc. Puente Nuevo Plaza -------------------------------------------------------- Confidentiality and Nondisclosure Notice: This email transmission and any attachments are intended for use by the person(s)/entity(ies) named above and may contain confidential/privileged information. Any unauthorized use, disclosure or distribution is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by email, and delete or destroy all copies plus attachments. |
| 05/02/2007 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | 4350 E. Irvington Road, Tucson, AZ 85714 Post Office Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702 WR#180497 April 30, 2007 Rick Engineering Company, Inc. Attn: Tri Miller 1745 E River Road, Suite 101 Tucson, Arizona 85718 Dear Mr. Miller : SUBJECT: Puente Nuevo Plaza D07-0017 Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the development plan submitted April 18, 2007. It appears that there are no conflicts with the existing facilities within the boundaries of this proposed development. TEP will need a full set of approved site, electrical load, paving off-site improvements and irrigation plans. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. Any relocation costs will be billable to the customer. In order to apply for electric service, call the New Construction Department at (520) 918-8300. Submit a final set of plans including approved site, offsite and electrical load plans. Include a CD with the AutoCAD version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Your final plans should be sent to: Tucson Electric Power Company Attn: Ms. Mary Boice New Business Project Manager P. O. Box 711 (DB-101) Tucson, AZ 85702 520-917-8732 Please call the area Designer Warren McElyea at (520) 918-8268, should you have any questions. Sincerely, Elizabeth Miranda Office Support Specialist Design/Build lm Enclosures cc: P. Gehlen and F. Rodriguez, City of Tucson (email) W. McElyea, Tucson Electric Power |
| 05/07/2007 | FRODRIG2 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Approved | CASE: D07-0017, PUENTE NUEVO PLAZA DEVEL PLAN COMMENT: NO OBJECTIONS OR ADVERSE COMMENTS Please call if you have questions or need additional information. Tom Cooney, Travel Forecasting Manager Pima Association of Governments 177 N. Church Ave, #405 Tucson, AZ 85701 Tel: (520) 792-1093, Fax: (520) 620-6981 Web: www.PAGnet.org and www.RTAmobility.com |
| 05/09/2007 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: June 25, 2007 To: Patricia Gehlen CDRC/Zoning Manager FROM: Loren Makus, EIT Engineering Division SUBJECT: Puente Nuevo Plaza Development Plan D07-0017 (First Review) T13S, R14E, Section 27 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Revised Development Plan, Revised Drainage Report The development plan has been reviewed by the Engineering Division and we do not recommend approval at this time. The following comments must be addressed: Clarify whether this is a Tenative Plat/Development Plan or only a Development Plan. If this is a Tentative Plat, provide proposed parcel boundaries with necessary survey information. Provide the recordation data for the right-of-way dedication and all easements that are to be abandoned. (DS 2-05.2.3.B and C) and for all adjacent existing rights-of-way, including the alley and Longfellow Avenue. Provide boundary data for the parcel that will remain after the right-of-way dedications have been completed. Show by proposed spot elevations and proposed slopes that the rainfall on the site will be directed through the water harvesting areas to the maximum amount practicable. (LUC 3.7.4) The existing drainage from the site appears to sheet off the site and the proposed drainage show the site discharging to two points of concentration. Provide a clear discussion in the drainage report and in your response letter detailing the potential effects of the concentrated discharge to the alley adjacent to the project or revise the drainage scheme to provide for safe discharge from the site. Consider providing another pedestrian circulation route so solid waste and delivery vehicles do not back over the crosswalks. Clearly show enough grade information to establish the drainage patterns for the areas between the perimeter buildings and the property boundaries. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 520.837.4927 or loren.makus@tucsonaz.gov. Loren Makus, EIT Senior Engineering Associate |
| 05/10/2007 | KAROL ARAGONEZ | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Karol Aragonez Planner PROJECT: D07-0017 Puente Nuevo Plaza Development Plan TRANSMITTAL DATE: May 9, 2007 DUE DATE: May 16, 2007 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is April 17, 2008. 2. Please provide the contour interval with the north arrow on all applicable sheets of the development plan. DS 2-05.2.1.H 3. Case number D07-0017 has been assigned to this development plan (DP). Please place this number in the right corner of all sheets of the development plan, landscape plan, NPPO, and any other associated sheets. DS 2-05.2.2.B.2 4. Please revise retail listed under proposed use to "General Merchandise Sales". DS 2-05.2.2.B.3 5. Please draw all existing easements on the plan along with recordation information, location, width, and purpose. If an easement is no longer in use and scheduled to be vacated or has been abandoned, so indicate. If none exist provide response to reviewer's comments. Also if easements are purposed please draw, dimension and label as to their purpose and whether they will be public or private. If none exist provide response to reviewer's comments. DS 2-05.2.3.B & DS 2-05.2.4.G 6. Please dimension all existing curbs and sidewalks Longfellow Avenue. DS 2-05.2.3.C 7. Please clarify if the one (1) foot dimension shown is the required setback per DS 3-05.2.2.B.2 or the actual overhang of the carport. DS 3-05.2.2.B.2 8. Please provide a detail of the carport. Supports for the carport cannot be greater than three and one-half (3 1/2) feet from the front of the parking space so that they not interfere with car doors. 9. Please label parking provided along the north property line as being covered. 10. A five (5) foot wide pedestrian refuge must be maintained between a PAAL and building. This refuge area will also include a four (4) foot wide sidewalk and be physically separated from the PAAL with a vertical curb. DS 3-05.2.2.B.1 & DS 2-08.4.1.B 11. Please provide a pedestrian connection direct from the site to the existing sidewalk within Longfellow Avenue as required by rezoning condition 10. Providing a connection within the right-of-way of Alvernon is not the intention of this rezoning condition. C9-06-31 Rezoning Condition 10 12. The placement of dumpsters and off-street loading that require access and maneuvering within the main entrances from Alvernon Way and Ft. Lowell would appear to create an unsafe situation for pedestrians using the crosswalks placed behind these areas and for incoming traffic where trucks would potentially block access into and out of the project site. Please verify with Engineering and Environmental Services if the placement meets their standards. 13. Please clarify if the symbol shown in front of the east four (4) parking spaces and west seven (7) along the north property line are bollards. If bollards are placed in front of the parking spaces this will reduce the length of the required eighteen (18) foot long parking space by not allowing the required two and one-half (2 1/2) foot overhang to occur. LUC 3.3.7.2.A 14. Please add keynote 6 to the north and east side of Building 4 and the between the off-street loading space and Building 4 on the west. Add keynote 6 to the north side of Building 2, and the north and west side of Building 3. Please note minimum sidewalk width is four (4) feet. 15. Rehabilitation and physical therapy require twenty (20) percent, but not less than one (1), of the portion of patient and visitor parking spaces to be accessible. Please provide separate parking calculations for the additional accessible spaces required or indicate that medical services will not include these uses. 2003 IBC Sec. 1106.4 16. Please revise the required number of van accessible spaces from one (1) to two (2). One (1) van accessible space is required for every six (6) or fraction thereof of HC spaces. 2003 IBC Sec. 1106.5 17. Please provide a detail of required curb ramps for crosswalks. Curb ramps shall be a minimum of three (3) feet in width, exclusive of flared sides. The curb ramp flares shall not be steeper than 1:10. Counter slopes of adjoining gutters and road surfaces immediately adjacent to the curb ramp shall not be steeper than 1:20. The adjacent surfaces at transitions at curb ramps to walks, gutters and streets shall be at the same level. All slopes are to be indicated on the plan/plat and associated details. ANSI 406.2, 3, & 4 All accessible curb ramps including the flush entrances of buildings shall have truncated domes installed that shall be twenty-four (24) inches minimum in the direction of travel and extend the full width of the curb ramp or flush surface. The domes shall be located so the edge nearest the curb line is six (6) inches to eight (8) inches from the curb line. ANSI 406.12, ANSI 705 18. Please add note to detail D/2 that handicap signage will be posted a minimum of seven (7) from the top of the curb to the bottom of the sign. TDOT 19. Bicycle parking provided on the DP does not meet the requirements of revised DS (Development Standard) 2-09. Per DS 2-09.4.1 Class 2 bicycle parking facilities will be located no more than fifty (50) feet from the main building entrance(s) and will be along the front side of the building as well as along other sides of the building that has an entrance. Bicycle access through the development will be separate from the pedestrian ways. Vehicular access may be used as bicycle access. Bicycle access to a parking facility may cross a pedestrian way at a right angle (DS2-09.3.2). Multiple rack bicycle parking require a minimum thirty (30) inches between outer spaces of posts or racks (DS 2-09.5.1.A). Please provide detail of type of Class 2 bicycle rack that is proposed. Please review DS 2-09.8.0 Figure 2 - 7 for acceptable and unacceptable rack designs, Figure 8 for rack location, and Figure 9 for dimensional requirements. 20. Please provide the location of required Class 1 bicycle parking on the development plan. 21. Please correct the height shown for building 4 from thirty-six (36) feet to the maximum allowed height of thirty (30) feet. LUC 3.2.3.2.B Development Designator 28 & 29 22. Please correct the required length of the loading zone for medical office use from fifty-five (55) feet to thirty-five (35) feet. LUC 3.4.5.4 23. Per rezoning condition 12 outdoor dumpster and loading zones shall be located a minimum of fifty (50) feet from any adjacent residentially zoned or used property. The dumpster and loading space located northeast of Building 1 appears to be closer than fifty (50) feet from the MH-1 zoned property to the east. Please provide a dimension from the east right-of-way line of Longfellow to the edge of the dumpster/loading space. If less than fifty (50) feet please relocate dumpster and loading space. C9-06-31 Rezoning Condition 12 & DS 2-05.2.4.U 24. Please provide colored, dimensioned elevations, colored details of signage, lighting, and screen walls for review by the Department of Urban Planning and Design (DUPD) architectural detail as required by rezoning condition 9. The development plan will not be approved until this information is provided and approved by DUPD. C9-06-31 Rezoning Condition 9 & DS 2-05.2.4.U 25. Please provide a wall detail illustrating compliance to rezoning condition 13. C9-06-31 Rezoning Condition 13 & DS 2-05.2.4.U 26. Please indicate the location of postal service to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements on the development plan. DS 2-05.2.4.V 27. Indicate the locations and types of proposed signs (wall, freestanding, pedestal) to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements and that minimal locational requirements can be met. Also indicate if there are existing billboards on site. Billboards will be required to meet all LUC requirements as stated in LUC Sec. 3.5.4.26. If none exists please state so in response letter. DS 2-05.2.4.W & LUC 3.5.4.26 If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Karol Aragonez, (520) 791-5550, ext. 74960. KAA S:\zoning review\karol\planning\cdrc\developmentplan\D07-0017dp.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development plan and additional requested documents. |
| 05/14/2007 | JOSE ORTIZ | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Denied | May 14, 2007 ACTIVITY NUMBER: D07-0017 PROJECT NAME: Puente Nuevo Plaza PROJECT ADDRESS: 3915 E Fort Lowell Rd PROJECT REVIEWER: Jose E. Ortiz PE, Traffic Engineer Resubmittal Required: Traffic Engineering does not recommend approval of the Development Plan; therefore a revised Development Plan is required for re-submittal. The following items must be revised or added to the development plan. 1. Include a response letter with the next submittal that states how all comments have been addressed. 2. A private improvement agreement (PIA) will be necessary for the proposed work to be performed within the Right-of-way. An approved tentative plat is required prior to applying for a PIA. Contact the PIA Coordinator for additional PIA information at 791-5550 ext. 1107. 3. Call out future and existing right of way on sheets 3 and 4. 4. In an effort to streamline the off site design, TDOT Traffic Engineering would like to sit down with the Engineering Consultant to discuss various options in off-site improvements. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-4259 x76730 or Jose.Ortiz@tucsonaz.gov |
| 05/16/2007 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | The Native Plant Preservation Application is approved. resubmittal of the Development and Landscape plans is required. 1) Show and identify all proposed screen walls on the landscape plans. DS 2-07.2.2.A.3 2) Revise the plans to screen all loading areas from adjacent street with a 6' high wall per LUC Table 3.7.2-I. 3) Trees and shrubs are to be selected and located so that, at maturity, they do not interfere with existing on-site or off-site utility service lines or utility easements. Revise the landscape plan if necessary to avoid conflicts with the proposed sewer line. LUC 3.7.2.6.B 4) Revise sheets 2 and 4 of the development plan to ensure that screen wall height information is consistent. 5) Signs are required to be designed and integrated into the landscape areas per C9-06-31. Show signage locations on the landscape plans. 6) Revise the landscape plan to indicate the minimum width and square footage of tree planters north of building 4. Provide details. DS 2-07.2.2.A.2.e, LUC 3.7.2.3.A.1.c 7) Revise the landscape plan to include slope ratios for retention and detention basins. Basin slopes in most instances are required to have slopes no steeper than 4:1 where depths exceed three feet; 3:1 for unprotected slopes and 2: 1 for protected slopes for depths less than three feet. DS 10-01.4 8) Any required storm water detention/retention basins shall be landscaped to enhance the natural configuration of the basin. Design criteria are set forth in Development Standard 10-01.0. LUC 3.7.4.3.A Show any proposed basins on the Development and Landscape Plans. 9) Add the CDRC case to the landscape and native plant preservation plans. DS 2-07.2.1.B |
| 05/16/2007 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: D07-0017 PUENTE NUEVO PLAZA/DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE: May 16, 2007 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: Correct Alvernon Road to Alvernon Way on sheets 3 thru 6. Correct Longfellow Ave to Longfellow Avenue on sheets 3 thru 5. Bolden the Building footprints on sheets 3 and 6. Label Condominium Units per Pima County Policy (100 series on 1st floor, 200 series on 2nd floor) and label in Title Block. jg |
| 05/17/2007 | FRODRIG2 | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Denied | Please provide Real Estate with any legal descriptions needed for right of way dedication per the re-zoning. |
| 05/17/2007 | PGEHLEN1 | TUCSON WATER NEW AREA DEVELOPMENT | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 05/17/2007 | ED ABRIGO | PIMA COUNTY | ASSESSOR | Passed | |
| 05/17/2007 | ROBERT YOUNG | PIMA COUNTY | PIMA CTY - DEV REVIEW | Passed | |
| 05/18/2007 | ANDY VERA | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Trash enclosure detail on sheet 2: Gates must have the ability to be secured in the open postion during refuse service. DS 6-01.4.2.4. Recommend to include annotation to "Construct door frames using", ... with positive locking and (bayonet) anchors, and quantity of four galvanized pipe 1in. dia. x 6in. long, to be flush with concrete (locate so gates can be secured in the open and closed positions). 2. Enclosures are positioned within the development so that they do not provide a continous flow for the service vehicle. DS 6-01.4.1.H. Recommend moving enclosure located by the Ft. lowell entrance/exit to the north side of the loading zone within the curbed island with the same angle. Please make appropriate changes for resubmittal. |
| 05/21/2007 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Denied | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN COMMENTS Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT D07-0017 Puente Nuevo Plaza 05/18/07 () Tentative Plat (X) Development Plan (X) Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other CROSS REFERENCE: C9-06-31 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Northside Area Plan GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: NO COMMENTS DUE BY: May 16, 2007 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment () Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies with Plan Policies (X) See Additional Comments Attached () No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: (X) Resubmittal Required: () Tentative Plat (X) Development Plan (X) Landscape Plan () Other REVIEWER: msp 791-4505 DATE: May 15, 2007 Department of Urban Planning and Design Comments D07-0017 – Puente Nuevo Plaza April 14, 2007 Staff offers the following comments: Rezoning case, C9-06-31, condition #9, requires all building facades visible from right-of-way to be designed with attention to architectural character and detail with consistent design treatment, including but not limited to, comparable color palette, sighs, lighting, screen walls rooflines, and materials. Dimensioned elevations drawings shall be submitted at the time of development review. Please resubmit and revise development plan to include (color palette required) scaled, four-sided, and colored dimensioned elevations on all buildings, to document compliance with rezoning condition #9. Please revise development plan and landscape plan to meet the intent of rezoning condition # 10, which is to connect the on-site pedestrian circulation system directly to Longfellow Avenue and Alvernon Way frontage, not through the Fort Lowell frontage sidewalk system. Revise plans to provide multiple and direct pedestrian links using the on-site pedestrian circulation system-1), provide a pedestrian link from building #1 directly to Longfellow Avenue sidewalk system (not Fort Lowell Road), -2), provide a pedestrian link from Building #4, directly to Longfellow Avenue sidewalk system (not Fort Lowell Road), and -3), provide a direct pedestrian link from building #2, by use of the existing Alvernon Wash bridge to the Alvernon Way sidewalk system. The existing pedestrian bridge that crosses the Alvernon Wash shall be part of the pedestrian link between Alvernon Way and the on-site pedestrian circulation system. Please revise development plan and landscape plan to show all dumpsters and loading zones a minimum of 50 feet from any residentially zoned or used property. The dumpster and loading zone located at the southeast corner area of the site is less than 50 feet from the residentially zoned properties located east, across Longfellow Avenue. Please revise “Keynote #12” wherever it is shown in the development plan to include the following information, ..30” inch screen wall, minimum six inch fence block to be used. |
| 05/21/2007 | TIM ROWE | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | May 17, 2007 To: Bruce Paton, P.E. Rick Engineering Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department ____________________________________ From: Felipe Ip, Sr. Civil Eng. Assistant (520-740-6706), representing the Pima County Departments of Wastewater Management and Environmental Quality Subject: Tentative Plat/Development Plan Puente Nuevo Plaza 1st Submittal, D07-017 The proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. Obtain a letter from the PCWMD's Development Services Section, written within the past 90 days, stating that treatment and conveyance system capacity for the project is available in the downstream public sewerage system and provide a copy of that letter to this office. The required form to request such a letter may be found at: http://www.pima.gov/wwm/forms/docs/CapResponseRequest.pdf. The development plan for this project cannot be approved until a copy of this letter has been received by this office. All Sheets: Add the development case number, D07-017, to the title block of each sheet. This number should be shown larger or bolder than any cross reference numbers. No wastewater review fees will be charged for sheets where this is the only required revision. All Sheets: Revise the plan to show all applicable cross reference numbers (re-zonings, etc.) near the title block of each sheet. These numbers should be shown smaller and less bold than the case number D07-017. In regards to the wastewater Fixture Unit Equivalent (FUE) count, this property is the former site of TUSD Davidson Elementary School. The school originally had 155 FUE. The proposed project will have 350 FUE. Contact Ms. Yvonne Saurez or Mrs. Ilene Deckard at PCWMD (740-6500) to inquire if any fixture unit credits are available for this project. Sheet 1: Add a General Note so it states: THE REQUIRED OFF-SITE PUBLIC SANITARY SEWER LINE WILL BE DESIGNED AND CONSTRUCTED TO PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT STANDARDS. Sheet 6: Revise the plan so the line-type of the existing sewer matches that shown for existing sewer in the Legend block of Sheet 1. Sheet 6: Revise the plan to provide a public sewer easement by final plat around the proposed manhole MH#1. Otherwise, revise the plan so that MH #1 is located outside of the project boundary line and that the full reach of the sewer that connects the project to the existing public sewer main E-78-03 at existing MH #8788-07 becomes PUBLIC and also MH#1 becomes PUBLIC. Sheet 6: Revise the plan to show the sewer flow direction over each segment of all existing and proposed sewers. Also, show the pipe material of the public sewer main E-78-03. Sheet 6: Revise the site plan to indicate the method of connection to the existing public manhole #8788-07 (COT/PC standard detail WWM 301). Call out existing and proposed invert elevations at manhole. At time of connection, a flow management plan may be required per COT/PC standard detail WWM A-5. Sheet 6: The proposed new sewer segment that connects the project to the existing public sewer main E-78-03 at existing MH #8788-07 is in public right-of-way will be constructed as a public sewer. Revise the site plan so that it shows: That proposed sewer segment identified as PUBLIC. All other proposed sewers should be identified as PRIVATE. Also see comment # 8. Sheet 6: Revise the plan to show the right-of-way or sewer easement with appropriate recording information for the area outside the project boundary where the proposed sewer segment connects to the existing 8” public sewer main E-78-03 at the public manhole MH#8788-07. Sheet 6: Label all proposed sewer building connections BCS. Sheet 6: 6-inch BCSs connecting directly to an 8-inch line are not allowed (4-inch BCS is okay). However if the plan requires 6” BCSs, they have to connect through a manhole on the proposed 8” private sewer (see comments Nos.14-20). Revise the plan to agree with such requirements. Sheet 6: Relocate the proposed MH#5 so that the 6” BCS from Cleanout (CO) #D connects at MH#5. Sheet 6: Relocate the proposed MH#4 so that the 6” BCS form CO #C connects at MH#4. Sheet 6: Relocate the proposed MH#7 so that the 6” BCS from CO #I connects at MH#7. Sheet 6: Relocate the proposed MH#6 so that the 6” BCS from CO #G connects at MH#6. Sheet 6: Revise the plan so that the 6” BCS from CO #B terminates at a manhole. Sheet 6: Revise the plan so that the 6” BCS from CO #E terminates at a manhole. Sheet 6: Revise the plan so that the 6” BCS from CO #H terminates at a manhole. Sheet 6: Revise the plan so it shows the abandoned sewer G-223 along Alvernon Road. Sheet 6: Revise the plan to show the continuation of existing sewer main E-78-03 coming from the east. Also, show the manholes downstream and upstream from the point of connection of proposed sewers to existing public sewer main E-78-03, with their IMS numbers, and rim and invert elevations. The IMS numbers are the sewer element identification numbers that can be found on the PCWMD Maps and Records (5th floor) basemaps or on PCWMD and PCDOT MapGuide internet websites. This office will require a revised set of bluelines, and a response letter, addressing these comments. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. The next submittal of this project will be the 2nd submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $100.00 (made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER) must accompany the revised set of bluelines and the response letter. If you have any questions regarding the above mentioned comments, please do not hesitate to contact me. CC: Project file |
| 05/29/2007 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | DATE: May 29, 2007 TO: Ferne Rodriguez, Development Services FROM: Glenn Hicks Parks and Recreation 791-4873 ext. 215 Glenn.Hicks@tucsonaz.gov CC: Patricia Gehlen SUBJECT: D07-0017 Puente Nuevo Plaza: Development Plan(4-11-07) Staff has no comments. |
| 06/26/2007 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES June 26, 2007 Tri Miller Rick Engineering Company, Inc. 1745 East River Road, Suite 101 Tucson, Arizona 85718 Subject: D07-0017 Puente Nuevo Plaza Development Plan Dear Tri: Your submittal of April 18, 2007 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 10 Copies Revised Development Plan (Engineering, Zoning, Traffic, Landscape, Addressing, Real Estate, ESD, Wastewater, DUPD, DSD) 5 Copies Revised Landscape Plan (Engineering, Zoning, Landscape, DUPD, DSD) 2 Copies Revised Drainage Report (Engineering, DSD) 2 Copies Colored Dimensioned Elevations (DUPD, DSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 791-5608 extension 1179. Sincerely, Patricia Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 322-6956 dp-resubmittal |