Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: REVISION - DEV PLAN
Permit Number - D07-0014
Review Name: REVISION - DEV PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06/29/2010 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 06/30/2010 | LAITH ALSHAMI | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | Laith Alshami, Engineering and Floodplain Review, 07/14/2010, TO: Patricia Gehlen FROM: Laith Alshami, P.E. CDRC Engineering SUBJECT: Sorrento Square Retail Center, Revision for Quick Trip D07-0014, T14S, R15E, SECTION 26 RECEIVED: Development Plan, Landscape Plan, and Drainage Report for Quick Trip on June 29, 2010 The subject submittal has been reviewed. We offer the following comments. Prepare a detailed response that explains the revisions that were made and references the exact location in the drainage report and on the Development Plan where the revisions were made: Drainage Report: 1. The report states that the ponding depths in Basins B and C will be1' and 1.5' respectively. It is not clear if the harvested water in these basins will be drained out completely through the proposed drainage structures or the basins will actually pond at depths that exceed 6" for long periods of time. Since these basins will operate more like retention basins, verify that the basins soils percolation rates are acceptable. Provide a geotechnical Report that addresses this issue. 2. The report states that Basin B will be bled through a stormdrain which is designed by others. When will the stormdrain be designed and installed? It seems that in order for the basin to work properly, the stormdrain needs to be installed at the same time with the basin at the latest. Clarify this issue and provide the stormdrain design with the next submittal. 3. The design of the stormdrain for the fuel canopy is not included in the submittal. 4. The design of the proposed temporary channel to Detention Basin B, shall be included in the submittal. Include a discussion in the text and show on the drainage exhibits. Development Plan: 1. Show the third curb opening east of the fuel island (D.S 2-05.2.4.H.3.). 2. Show the waterharvesting basins grades (D.S 2-05.2.4.H.4.). 3. Sheet numbers are not consistent on all the sheets. Revise as needed. 4. Keynote #4 does not appear to have the correct description. 5. Show the locations of the cross sections and details, provided on Sheets DP5.0 through DP5.4, on the plan. 6. Additional construction details may be required on the Grading Plan. 7. Revise the Development Plan in accordance with the Drainage Report revisions. Landscape Plan: 1. The proposed changes do not affect Engineering and Floodplain Review previous approval. The Landscape Plan is acceptable pertaining to Engineering and Floodplain. RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Revised Development Plan and Drainage Report |
| 07/01/2010 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Denied | Fire Comments: There is no fire hydrant or fire sprinkler tap shown for the Quick Trip. |
| 07/08/2010 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | COT NON-DSD | TUCSON POLICE DEPARTMENT | Approved | >>> Rebecca Noel 07/08/2010 11:13 AM >>> I have no issues with this proposal. CSO Becky Noel #37968 Tucson Police Dept 837-7428 |
| 07/09/2010 | JOHN BEALL | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Approv-Cond | PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT COMMENTS Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT D07-0014 (REVISION) Quik Trip - Sorrento Square 7/9/10 ( ) Tentative Plat ( X ) Development Plan ( X ) Landscape Plan ( ) Revised Plan/Plat ( ) Board of Adjustment ( X ) Elevations CROSS REFERENCE: C9-06-03 and C9-09-13 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: South Pantano GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: Gateway and Scenic COMMENTS DUE BY: July 14, 2010 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: ( ) No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment ( ) Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions ( ) RCP Proposal Complies with Plan Policies ( X ) See Additional Comments Attached ( ) No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: ( X ) Resubmittal Required: ( ) Tentative Plat ( X ) Development Plan ( X ) Landscape Plan ( X ) Elevations with Color Palette Key REVIEWER: JBeall 791-4505 DATE: July 9, 2010 Comments, 1) Although applicant submitted an 8 ½ x 11 ½ Building Elevation and Canopy sheet for Building 11, please provide a separate sheet (DP4.1) to show elevations for Quik Trip building and canopy - to be submitted in black and white and full size as other Development Plan sheets. Elevation sheet to show all building façade sides with dimensions, and identify colors with a corresponding palette key that includes manufacture names, paint colors, identifies any non-glare roof material/lines and exterior materials. Note: Having a black and white elevation sheet (with color palette key) ensures the elevations meet Rezoning Condition 9, allowing full approval and archiving. |
| 07/13/2010 | TERRY STEVENS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Terry Stevens Lead Planner PROJECT: D07-0040 Sorrento Square Retail Center Development Plan - Revision TRANSMITTAL: 07/13/2010 DUE DATE: 07/14/10 COMMENTS: 1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is 06/28/2011. 2. DS 2-05.2.2.B.1, .2 List as a general note: Existing zoning is SR. Proposed zoning is C-1 and C-2. Revise general note #5. 3. DS 2-05.2.2.B.3 In the site data portion of sheet DP1.0 list the proposed use in the C-2 portion of the site as follows: General Merchandise Sales "31", subject to: Sec. 3.5.9.2.A 4. DS 2-05.2.2.B.10 Add to general note #23: Sec. 2.8.4, Gateway Corridor Zone 5. DS 2-05.2.4.B Clearly indicate the zoning boundaries of the C-1 portion and the C-2 portion of this site. 6. DS 2-05.2.4.C This plan appears to be a phased project. Provide calculations, setbacks, etc., to indicate that each phase complies with all requirements as a separate entity. Show and label any temporary improvements that may be needed to make the site function for each phase as one entity. Such as curbing or barriers to prevent vehicles from driving onto unimproved portions of the site along the access drives, parking calculations, FAR calculations, etc. 7. DS 2-05.2.4.N In the site data portion of DP 1.0 for the building height, clearly indicate conformance with rezoning condition #13 (C9-06-03). Buildings within 200' of the south and west property lines may exceed 20' in height. 8. DS 2-05.2.4.P The call out for the detail of the handicap parking spaces is indicated as detail 1/ DP5.5 should be Detail 1/DP5.4. Revise. Clearly indicate the required 2'-6" overhang area for the parking spaces north of the fuel service canopy. Require to prevent damage to the landscape border. Wheel stops may be required. 9. DS 2-05.2.4.P The Quik Trip portion of this site is in conjunction with the entire shopping center and parked accordingly. Therefore class one bicycle locker will be required. Clearly indicate on the plan the location of the required class one bicycle parking space. Provide a detail of the class bicycle locker. Or provide a note indicating that the class one bicycle space will be located within the building. Per DS 2-09.4.1 Proximity to Main Entrances, Class two bicycle parking facilities will be located no more than 50 feet form the main entrance. A DSMR may be applied for. If a DSMR is applied for and approved provide as a general note the case number, date of approval, what the DSMR is for and any conditions of approval. Provide the DSMR case number near the lower right corner of each sheet. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Terry Stevens, (520) 837-4961 TLS C:\planning\cdrc\developmentplan\D07-0014dp-r.doc |
| 07/13/2010 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Denied | SHEET DP1.0 1. In the general notes, please delete all reference to ADA and make reference to the 2006 IBC, Chapter 11 and ICC (ANSI 117.1, 2003 Edition) for all accessibility code requirements. a. Please revise all accessibility notes to comply with the above code reference. SHEET DP2.1 2. Please provide blow up of Marked Crossing from South side of Quick Trip to Senic Corridor. Show all required accessibility requirements as per ICC (ANSI 117.1), Sections 106, 405, 406.12, and 406.14. Show all dimensions, slopes, ramps, markings and detectable warnings as required. 3. Please provide blow up of Marked Crossing from Quick Trip dumpster to Building 8. Show all required accessibility requirements as per ICC (ANSI 117.1), Sections 106, 405, 406.12, 406.14 and 705. Show all dimensions, slopes, ramps, markings and detectable warnings as required. 4. Reference comments for Sheet DP5.4 for all curb ramps shown on this sheet. SHEET DP5.4 5. Detail 1/5.4: a. The note referencing brick pavers, Note 5, where is note 5? b. Please delete all reference to ADA and make reference to the 2006 IBC, Chapter 11 and ICC (ANSI 117.1, 2003 Edition) for all accessibility code requirements. 6. Detail 2/5.4: a. The bottom of the main accessible sign is to be mounted at 7'-0" to the bottom as per COT DOT requirements. 7. Detail 4/5.4: a. Show the dectectable warning strip at 2' wide only as per ICC (ANSI 117.1) Sections 406.12 and 705. b. The flared sides are to be no steeper than 1:10 slope as per Section 406.3. END OF REVIEW |
| 07/14/2010 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Revise the NPP, Phasing and grading plans to correspond. 2) Submit the complete set of Landscape and NPP Plans. 3) Show the same area on the landscape plans as is indicated on the NPP, Phasing and Grading Plans. 4) Revise the landscape plan parking lot tree calculations to address rezoning condition 14. 5) Revise the landscape plans to show the limits of grading. DS 2-07.2.2.B.5 6) Show and identify existing plants to remain in place on the landscape plan per DS 2-07.2.2.A.1.e. Identify areas of existing vegetation to be preserved. 7) Revise the plans and notes to consistently and correctly identify the building or pad numbers. 8) Revise the water harvesting plan to calculate only portions of the site area for designation as catchment or sub-watershed area. Per DS 10-03.2.2 & 2.7 the catchment areas and impervious subwatersheds are to be areas of (within) the site. 9) Revise the water harvesting plans to distinguish between the water harvesting infiltration areas and subwatershed areas. Revise the calculations as necessary. 10) The catchment ratios in the development standard apply only to the water harvesting infiltration area and the impervious areas within the subject subwatershed. The calculations require revision. 11) Include total water demand and rainwater supply calculations for each Water Harvesting Infiltration Area at the site. DS 10-03.4.1.C 12) Revise the Water Harvesting spreadsheet to designate individual WHIA's and label these areas on the plans. 13) Revise the water harvesting plan to address maintenance requirements. DS 10-03.6.0 14) Indicate spot elevations for the bottoms of water harvesting structures, at spillways, and to define other grades as needed. DS 10-03.4.2.C.3.a)iii 15) Indicate the location of all surface or subsurface infiltration structures, pipelines, spillways, french drains, scuppers, curb cuts and other infrastructure elements needed to convey, store or overflow passively supplied water, or to control erosion on the water harvesting plan. |
| 07/14/2010 | JWILLIA4 | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | Case Number D07-0014 Sorrento Square Retail Center Development Plan Comments: Approved subject to the follow condition to be incorporated on the plans; The proposed Development Plan Case No D07-0014, for the Sorrento Square Retail Center. The Development plan must clearly show the proposed turning radius and maximum back-up distances for all solid waste and recyclable containers. All containers shown on the plan must indicate the intended use of containers if for solid waste or recycle collection. The plans must show a detail drawing of the on site solid waste and the recyclable containers enclosures as per the dimensions stated on City of Tucson Development Standard No. 6-01.0. Environmental Services Department Development Plan Review Reviewer: Tony Teran Office Phone (520) 837-3706 E-mail: Tony.Teran @tucsonaz.gov |
| 07/15/2010 | JOSE ORTIZ | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approv-Cond | TDOT-Traffic recommends a Conditional Approval of the Sorrento Square plat. The following needs to be provided prior to TDOT-Traffic final approval. A 'Covenant of Future Dedication' needs to be filed with the City of Tucson's Real Estate division for the potential right of way needs for the bus pad associated with the proposed bus pullout along Houghton Road. Work with Jim Stoyanoff or Jim Rossi in the preparation of the required documents. Provide a copy of the Covenant of Future Dedication to Patricia Gehlen and/or the Planning-Development Services Department. |
| 07/16/2010 | JWILLIA4 | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | PIMA COUNTY REGIONAL WASTEWATER RECLAMATION DEPARTMENT 201 NORTH STONE AVENUE TUCSON, ARIZONA 85701-1207 MICHAEL GRITZUK, P.E. PH: (520) 740-6500 DIRECTOR FAX: (520) 620-0135 July 14, 2010 To: Thomas Saylor-Brown, SBBL Architecture & Planning Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department ____________________________________ From: Tom Porter, Sr. CEA (520-740-6719), Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department Subject: Sorrento Square Retail Center Development Plan - 1st Submittal(Rev) D07-0014 The Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department (PCRWRD) has reviewed the proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project. The following comments are offered for your use: 1. We will send to your office via e-mail, a .pdf file containing a Sewer Service Agreement for the proposed number of wastewater fixture unit equivalents Upon receiving Owner(Applicant) or Title Company with address and Trust # from you we will generate the SSA. Three originals will need to be printed out from this file for notarized signatures by the Owner of Record. The three signed originals of the Agreement must be returned to this office in order to satisfy the necessary requirements needed to approve the Mylars of the Development Plan. 2nd Request. 2. The plan submitted does not match the conditionally approved plan submitted in October of 2008. Sheets DP3.0, DP3.2 and DP3.3 are all missing. This office will require a revised set of bluelines, and a response letter, addressing these comments. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. Pima County Code Title 13.20.030.A.2 requires that a wastewater review fee be paid for each submittal of the development plan. The fee for the first submittal is $166 plus $50 per sheet. For the second submittal, the review fee is $50 per sheet. For all subsequent submittals, the review fee is $39 per sheet. The next submittal of this project will be the second(2nd) submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $50.00 (made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER) must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. This comment letter has been reviewed and accepted for substantial conformance to Pima County Code Title 13 by: ___________________________ Chad Amateau, P.E., Civil Engineer PCRWRD, Planning Services Section, Development Liaison Unit cc: Chad Amateau, PE Kristin Borer, PE, DLU Manager DLU Project folder |
| 07/16/2010 | JOHN WILLIAMS | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES July 16, 2010 Thomas Sayler-Brown SBBL Architecture + Planning 1001 N. Alvernon Way Tucson, Arizona 85711 Subject: D07-0014 Sorrento Square Retail Center Development Plan Dear Thomas: Your submittal of June 29, 2010 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a set of 10 DETAILED cover letters explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 10 Copies Revised Development Plan (Engineering, Fire, Planning, HC Site, Zoning, Env Svcs, Landscape, Traffic, Wastewater, PDSD) 5 Copies Revised Landscape Plan (Engineering, Planning, Zoning, Landscape, PDSD) 2 Copies Elevations with Color Palette Key (Planning, PDSD) 2 Copies Revised Drainage Report (Engineering, PDSD) 1 Check Made out to "Pima County Treasurer" for $50.00 Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4917. Sincerely, John Williams Planning Technician All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: (520) 620-0535 |
| 07/16/2010 | JWILLIA4 | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | July 21, 2010 To: Thomas Saylor-Brown, SBBL Architecture & Planning Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department ____________________________________ From: Tom Porter, Sr. CEA (520-740-6719), Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department Subject: Sorrento Square Retail Center Development Plan – 1st Submittal(Rev) D07-0014 The Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department (PCRWRD) has reviewed the proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project. The following comments are offered for your use: We will send to your office via e-mail, a .pdf file containing a Sewer Service Agreement for the proposed number of wastewater fixture unit equivalents Upon receiving Owner(Applicant) or Title Company with address and Trust # from you we will generate the SSA. Three originals will need to be printed out from this file for notarized signatures by the Owner of Record. The three signed originals of the Agreement must be returned to this office in order to satisfy the necessary requirements needed to approve the Mylars of the Development Plan. 2nd Request. This office will require a revised set of bluelines, and a response letter, addressing these comments. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. Pima County Code Title 13.20.030.A.2 requires that a wastewater review fee be paid for each submittal of the development plan. The fee for the first submittal is $166 plus $50 per sheet. For the second submittal, the review fee is $50 per sheet. For all subsequent submittals, the review fee is $39 per sheet. The next submittal of this project will be the second(2nd) submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $50.00 (made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER) must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. This comment letter has been reviewed and accepted for substantial conformance to Pima County Code Title 13 by: ___________________________ Chad Amateau, P.E., Civil Engineer PCRWRD, Planning Services Section, Development Liaison Unit cc: Chad Amateau, PE Kristin Borer, PE, DLU Manager DLU Project folder |