Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - DEV PLAN
Permit Number - D07-0014
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - DEV PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08/17/2007 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 08/21/2007 | CDRC1 | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | August 21, 2007 To: Thomas Saylor-Brown, SBBL Architecture & Planning Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department ____________________________________ From: Tom Porter, Sr. CEA (520-740-6579), representing the Pima County Departments of Wastewater Management and Environmental Quality Subject: Sorrento Square Retail Center Development Plan - 2nd Submittal D07-0014 The proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. 1. Obtain a letter from the PCWMD's Development Services Section, written within the past 90 days, stating that treatment and conveyance system capacity for the project is available in the downstream public sewerage system and provide a copy of that letter to this office. The required form to request such a letter may be found at: http://www.pima.gov/wwm/forms/docs/CapResponseRequest.pdf. The development plan for this project cannot be approved until a copy of this letter has been received by this office. 2nd request. 2. Sheet 8, 9 & 10: The lines called HCS should be named BCS. The slope/length and material of pipe for the BCS should be shown for all BCS. 3. Sheet 8, 9 & 10: Show the rim and invert elevations for all of the cleanouts. 4. Sheet 8, 9 & 10: On-site public sewers may be used to sewer portions of this project but only if they provide public flow-through service. 5. Sheet 8, 9 & 10: A legal description and location map for the on-site public sewer easement will be required for review. The on-site public sewer easement must be created by separate instrument not by final plat because development of the property will proceed the recording of the final plat. The DP cannot be conditionally approved before we have approved the legal description and location map and the DP mylars may not be approved until after the easement is recorded and the recording information is shown on the DP mylars. 6. Sheet 9: The public sewer line extension to the east in the northernmost entrance onto Houghton Rd. is alright but the terminal manhole should be deeper (8-10' vs 6'). 7. Sheet 9: The public sewer line extension to the north should be in the westernmost entrance onto Golf Links not the easternmost due to the topography of the parcels on the north side of Golf Links. 8. Sheet 10: The IMS #'s for the existing MH's along Bonanza need to be shown.2nd request. 9. Sheet 10: Show the sewer line continuing west of New MH# 8. 10. Sheet 10: Provide a stabilized driving surface from Lurlene to MH#8 but do not extend it to MH#9 because it runs through an archeological site. Provide a copy of an archeological clearance letter for the archeological site. Provide the stabilized driving surface to MH#9 from the parking lot. 11. Sheet 11: The off-site public sewer line(1,447') in Lurlene Dr. is a " qualifying public sewer improvement" that will qualify this project for connection fee discounts. This office will require a revised set of bluelines, and a response letter, addressing these comments. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. Pima County Code Title 13.20.030.A.2 requires that a wastewater review fee be paid for each submittal of the development plan. The fee for the first submittal is $166 plus $50 per sheet. For the second submittal, the review fee is $50 per sheet. For all subsequent submittals, the review fee is $39 per sheet. The next submittal of this project will be the 3rd submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $156.00(made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER) must accompany the revised set of blue lines and response letter. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. If you have any questions regarding the above mentioned comments, please contact me . |
| 08/28/2007 | DAVID MANN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 08/29/2007 | LAITH ALSHAMI | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | Laith Alshami, Engineering and Floodplain Review, 08/29/2007, TO: Patricia Gehlen FROM: Laith Alshami, P.E. CDRC Engineering SUBJECT: Sorrento Square Retail Center D07-0014, T14S, R15E, SECTION 26 RECEIVED: Development Plan, Landscape Plan, and Drainage Report on August 17, 2007 The subject submittal has been reviewed. We offer the following comments. Prepare a detailed response that explains the revisions that were made and references the exact location in the drainage report and on the Development Plan where the revisions were made: Drainage Report: 1. The proposed improvements still show some encroachments into the 100-year floodplain. Clarify what appears to be riprapped areas within the floodplain of the "Xeroriparian Intermediate Habitat" Wash. (see Figure 4). This encroachment appears to be unnecessary and can be pulled out of the regulatory floodplain area. Address this issue and revise as necessary. 2. Roof drainage shall be addressed, in details, on the grading plan and the drainage report submitted with the grading plan. According to D.S. 2-05.2.4.H.3. and D.S. 3-01.4.4.F. 10-year flow has to be completely conveyed under sidewalks when concentrated runoff crosses any sidewalk/walkway. Additionally, show the roof drainage direction on the drainage exhibits and the grading plan and provide sidewalk scuppers for the roof drains. Please be advised that the 10-year flow requirement does not apply to roof drainage. Roof drainage has to be discharged in its entirety to avoid prolonged ponding on the roof that might cause the roof to collapse. Demonstrate compliance with the sidewalk scupper requirement including design calculations. 3. The future conditions HEC RAS analysis does not appear to incorporate cross sections that include the proposed box culvert. The pre and post cross sections appear to be exactly the same. Revise as necessary and provide the cross section plots for existing and proposed conditions. 4. It does not appear that the proper hydraulic transitions upstream and downstream of the proposed box culvert were applied for the analyzed wash. Revise the analysis as necessary. 5. Building 11 appears to be closer to the waterharvesting area than the geotechnical report recommends. Either relocate the waterharvesting area to comply with the setback requirements or consult with LMT about the situation. LMT might have certain recommendations concerning this issue. Please be advised that the geotechnical report might need to be revised based on this comment. 6. Rezoning Condition #20 requires that all detention/retention basins shall have sediment traps. It appears that Basin "C" does not have a sediment trap. Revise. 7. Clarify how the proposed basin floors are designed in accordance with Detention/retention basins shall be designed in accordance with Rezoning Condition #21. Revise the basins accordingly and provide adequate number of spot elevations. 8. Due to Basins' "B" and "C" small size, provide them with access ramps that would facilitate their maintenance and allow access to a wheelbarrow. 9. The proposed development appears to encroach on jurisdictional 404 areas especially with the proposed box culvert crossing. Delineate the 404 jurisdictional area and submit the required 404 permit or clearance issued by the Army Corp of Engineers. 10. Please be advised for future reference that the drainage exhibits and the development plan/Tentative Plat shall provide additional construction details and dimensions (i.e. detention basins, inlets and outlets, scuppers, proposed channel lengths and widths, channel and maintenance ramp dimensions slopes, channel flow line, box culverts and pipe invert elevations, ponding water and erosion hazard setbacks, etc.). This information will facilitate the preparation and review of grading plans. Development Plan: 1. List, in the general notes, the proposed use of the property (D.S. 2-05.2.2.B.3.). 2. Show the parcel lines monuments and clarify if they are found or set. Provide the required survey information for all parcel line monuments. The response to this previous comment is not sufficient. 3. Verify, either on the plan or in written documentation, compliance with Rezoning conditions 2, 4, 6, 8, 11, 12, 15, 16, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24 and 25. The letter addressing the Rezoning Conditions compliance was not found in the submittal. Provide written documentation from TDOT verifying compliance. Please be advised that Houghton Road and Golf Links Road cross section details, shown on sheet 12/13, might need to be revised in accordance with the Rezoning Conditions and TDOT's requirements to verify compliance. 4. The 100-year floodplain does not appear to have been completely preserved as required by Rezoning Condition # 15. It appears that riprap has been proposed within the regulatory floodplain. Revise the Development Plan/Tentative Plat to demonstrate compliance. 5. The property legal description includes two parcels, which do not appear to be delineated on the plan. Additionally, the legal description does not appear to be complete. Verify if the legals are accurate. The email correspondence was not included in the submittal. 6. Based on the recommendations of the Geotechnical Report, show the proposed slope and ponding water setback lines. Proposed buildings shall be located outside the said setbacks (D.S. 2-05.2.4.I.). 7. Show the ratio of all proposed slopes. Additionally, all proposed slope protection and stabilization shall be based on the recommendations of the geotechnical report. Demonstrate compliance with this requirement. Please be advised that not all slope ratios have been provided. 8. According to D.S. 2-05.2.4.H.3. and D.S. 3-01.4.4.F. 10-year flow has to be completely conveyed under sidewalks when the runoff crosses any sidewalk/walkway. This also applies to roof drainage. Demonstrate compliance with this requirement on the grading plan. 9. Delineate the 404 jurisdictional areas if applicable. 11. Please be advised for future reference that the drainage exhibits and the development plan/Tentative Plat shall provide additional construction details and dimensions (i.e. detention basins, inlets and outlets, scuppers, proposed channel lengths and widths, channel and maintenance ramp dimensions slopes, channel flow line, box culverts and pipe invert elevations, ponding water and erosion hazard setbacks, etc.). This information will facilitate the preparation and review of grading plans. 10. Revise the Development Plan in accordance with the Drainage Report revisions. Landscape Plan: The landscape plan is acceptable pertaining to Engineering review. Field modifications might be required to ensure compliance and safety. RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Revised Development Plan and Drainage Report |
| 08/29/2007 | GLYNDA ROTHWELL | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | 4350 E. Irvington Road, Tucson, AZ 85714 Post Office Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702 WR#180143 August 28, 2007 Dear Eric Fletcher : SUBJECT: SORRENTO SQUARE RETAIL CENTER D07-0014 Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the revised development plan submitted August 20, 2007 It appears that there are no conflicts with the existing facilities within the boundaries of this proposed development. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. In order to apply for electric service, call the New Construction Department at (520) 918-8300. Submit a final set of plans including approved site, offsite and electrical load plans. Include a CD with the AutoCAD version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Your final plans should be sent to: Tucson Electric Power Company Attn: Ms. Mary Boice New Business Project Manager P. O. Box 711 (DB-101) Tucson, AZ 85702 520-917-8732 Please call the area Designer Nancy DiMaria at (520) 918-8267, should you have any questions. Sincerely, Henrietta Noriega Office Specialist Design/Build hn Enclosures cc: N. DiMaria, Tucson Electric Power |
| 09/04/2007 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Approved | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: D07-0014 SORRENTO SQUARE RETAIL CENTER/DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE: 9/04/07 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and we hereby approve this project. 1.) Submit a 24 x 36 Reverse Reading Double Matte Photo Mylar of approved Development Plan to City Planning. Signed and dated Mylar will be forwarded to Pima County Addressing prior to assignment of addresses. 2.) All addresses will need to be displayed per Pima County Address Standards at the time of final inspection. ES |
| 09/11/2007 | KAROL ARAGONEZ | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Karol Aragonez Planner PROJECT: D07-0014 Sorrento Square Retail Center Development Plan TRANSMITTAL DATE: September 11, 2007 DUE DATE: September 17, 2007 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. Please note because the applicant is now submitting plan as a tentative plat new comments (1-7) have been generated. 1. A new subdivision case number should be assigned to this plan/plat. Please contact the CDRC Manager Patricia Gehlen as to what will be required. 2. Within the location map please identify subdivision plats by book and page number. DS 2-03.2.1.D.2 3. Within the title block please note the number of proposed lots. DS 2-03.2.1.G.2 4. Please add as a general note "The number of lots is _____". DS 2-03.2.2.4 5. Please add as a general note "Total miles of new public streets are zero (0), Total miles of new private streets are zero (0)". DS 2-03.2.2.B.1.b 6. A blanket cross access/parking easement will be required to cover the entire shopping center or each individual parcel will be required to provide separate calculations that demonstrate zoning compliance. Please provide. 7. It appears that common areas have not been established over landscape buffers and the natural drainage way. Please provide document that establishes the responsibility of care and maintenance to be provided to these areas. 8. Please provide a separate response letter detailing compliance with rezoning conditions case number C9-06-03. DS 2-05.2.4.U 9. The numbers of motor vehicle parking spaces indicated in the parking calculations and the number shown in plan view appear not to match. Calculations now indicate 621 spaces but 707 are shown on the plan. Please verify and correct as needed. 10. Sheet DP1.3 indicates that there is 5670 sq. ft. of outdoor dining area. The plan view only shows areas added up to 4970 sq. ft. Please provide the location of the remainder of the outdoor dining areas. 11. Previous Comment: A minimum setback distance of five (5) feet for a pedestrian refuge area, which includes a four (4), foot sidewalk that is physically separated from the PAAL must be provided between and enclosed structure and a PAAL. This is required for building 1 along the south and west side of structure, the west side of building 6, the east side of building 6a, and the west side of building 8. DS 3-05.2.2.B.1 12. Once the DSMR has been approved please add the DSMR case number in the lower right corner of all sheets of the DP, landscape plan, and NPPO. As a note provide the case number, date of approval, what was approved and any conditions applied to the modification. 13. Previous Comment: Per DS 2-08.3.1 a continuous pedestrian circulation path must connect all buildings within a development, which is also an accessible route. This route will be a minimum four (4) foot wide concrete sidewalk. Please label or provide note indicating minimum sidewalk width through-out project site. Areas within this project that appear not connect to other areas of the project site is building 9 which does not connect to the rest of the site, and buildings 2-5 which does not connect to buildings 1 and 1a. Also the pedestrian connection from Houghton Road does not connect to buildings 1, 1a, and 6-8. Please revise. 14. Once the DSMR has been approved please add the DSMR case number in the lower right corner of all sheets of the DP, landscape plan, and NPPO. As a note provide the case number, date of approval, what was approved and any conditions applied to the modification. 15. Previous Comment: Please verify with Environmental Services if an additional dumpster is not required for building 5. It appears that the distance to the nearest dumpster at building 4 may be excessive. Per discussion with Andy Vera of Environmental Services, a dumpster that is closer to building 6 will be required. The nearest trash receptacle is two hundred and ten (210) feet to the west. Please contact Andy Vera to discuss this situation at (520) 791-3175. Scenic Corridor (SCZ) 16. Please add to the end of general note 5 on sheet DP4.0 and general note 44 on sheet DP1.0 "in Land Use Code Sec. 3.7.3, Screening Requirements". 17. Please correct the spelling of the word "length" in general note 10 on sheet DP4.0. 18. The Overlay Zone case number, T07SA00150 (no longer SCZ number), must be noted in the lower right corner of each sheet of the tentative plat, landscape, and NPPO plans. All required elements of the SCZ as shown on the approved Overlay Zone plan must be added to the tentative plat/development plan, along with date of approval and any conditions placed on that approval. The tentative plat may not be approved prior to Overlay Zone application approval. LUC 2.8.2 19. Please note the tentative plat/development plan can be submitted concurrently with the overlay zone to reduce the number of copies required for review. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Karol Aragonez, (520) 837-4960 KAA S:\zoning review\karol\planning\cdrc\developmentplan\D07-0014dp.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised tentative plat/development plan and additional requested documents. |
| 09/14/2007 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Add the rezoning case number C9-06-03 to the landscape and native plant preservation plans. DS 2-07.2.1.B 2) A.The site contains regulatory floodplain areas that may contain riparian habitat. Per C9-06-03 the floodplain shall be preserved in it's natural state as shown on the Preliminary Development Plan. Revise the plans as necessary to comply. The PDP shows an access lane crossing the natural drainageway and miminmal disturbance where the floodplain extended north into the proposed parking area. B. DOT Traffic has indicated that they would be receptive to a different alignment for the northern driveway off of Houghton. This driveway is right in/right out therefore it does not need to align with the existing driveway on the eastside of Houghton. The consultant should consult with Traffic prior to the next submittal to ensure that the new driveway alignment meets DOT-Traffic requirements. 3) Revise the tentative plat/development plans to identify and delineate the Protected Riparian Area. The ERR indicates that the flood plain will serve as the limits of the Protected Riparian Area. 4) Where the Protected Riparian Area is on property that remains under the ownership of a single person or entity following the development, the Protected Riparian Area shall be protected through a conservation or public easement or other legal restriction upon further development. Revise the tentative plat/DP to document the required easement. Reference the recording information on the Tentative Plat/Development Plan 5) No grubbing, grading, or construction will occur on a project site which includes areas designated as Protected Riparian Area to be retained in a natural state until those designated areas are temporarily fenced. Identify Protected Riparian Areas on the NPP Plan. This is to be the same area protected per the comment above. 6) Call out the loading area screen west of Building 2 on the landscape plan. 7) Revise the NPP plan and landscape plans to limit grading or disturbance at the archaeological site as indicated on the Development Plan in the note regarding protective fencing. Grading should be restricted in these areas. Identify the fence location. LUC 2.8.2.4, C9-06-03 RESUBMITTAL OF ALL PLANS IS REQUIRED. |
| 09/19/2007 | FRODRIG2 | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Approv-Cond | >>> Jim Stoyanoff 09/17/2007 10:04 AM >>> As I understand it, this development plan will be converted to a subdivision final plat. Right of way for MS&R will be dedicated to the City by the final plat. Also, the one foot no access easement on the west and south perimeter will be shown on the final plat. Real Estate will need to be included in the final plat review. |
| 09/19/2007 | JOSE ORTIZ | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Denied | September 19, 2007 ACTIVITY NUMBER: D07-0014 PROJECT NAME: Sorrento Square Retail Center PROJECT ADDRESS: Golf Links Rd/Houghton Rd PROJECT REVIEWER: Jose E. Ortiz PE, Traffic Engineer Resubmittal Required: Traffic Engineering does not recommend approval of the Development Plan; therefore a revised Development Plan is required for re-submittal. The following items must be revised or added to the development plan. 1. Include a response letter with the next submittal that states how all comments have been addressed. 2. Comment 7 form our previous set of comments was not addressed "A meeting maybe in order to discuss possible vehicular conflicts created by the existing acceleration/merge lane (along Houghton in the southbound direction as motorists turn right off of Golf Links) and the proposed right turn lane into this development along Houghton. The Traffic Impact Analysis should discuss this issue and if possible provide recommendations for minimizing this conflict. " Vince Catalano and I will provide additional feedback prior to the next submittal of this Development Plan. 3. Comment 8 from our previous set of comments was not addressed. "Along Golf Links the proposed right turn/decel lane could create vehicular conflicts with exiting motorists from this development (using the right turn lane as an acceleration lane) with motorists decelerating off of Golf Links to enter this development, therefore provide a individual right turn lanes for each driveway." The TIA prepared by CLA recommends a continuous right turn lane, but the city would prefer to see separate right turn lanes for driveways 2 and driveway 3 along Golf Link Road. If needed coordinate with CLA prior to modifying the right turn lanes for acceptance by the traffic engineer. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-4259 x76730 or Jose.Ortiz@tucsonaz.gov |
| 09/19/2007 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Denied | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN COMMENTS Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT D07-0014 Sorrento Square Retail Center 09/18/07 () Tentative Plat ( X ) Development Plan ( X ) Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other CROSS REFERENCE: C9-06-03 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: South Pantano GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: COMMENTS DUE BY: September 17, 2007 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment () Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies with Plan Policies ( X ) See Additional Comments Attached () No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: ( X ) Resubmittal Required: () Tentative Plat ( X ) Development Plan ( X ) Landscape Plan () Other REVIEWER: JBeall 791-4505 DATE: September 17, 2007 Comments 9. The pedestrian path with benches and trash containers is not clearly labeled. Please correct as the rezoning conditions call out for a pedestrian path along the natural drainageway on the property located on the southwest portion of the site. This pedestrian path shall be constructed of natural materials and incorporate benches and trash containers. Please show this on the development plan and identify in Keynotes section. (Rezoning Condition no. 16) 12. Rezoning Condition No. 35 calls out that Five Buildings along the west and southwest side of the project will have hours of operation, along with loading and delivery times, restricted to between 7:00 am and 11:00 pm. General Note #8 on DP1.3 addresses this, however only four buildings are called out in the note. Please explain. |
| 09/21/2007 | ANDY VERA | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Denied | 1. DP2.0, A. Refuse enclosure for building #3 is positioned so service vehicle must back into moving traffice/private street in order to maneuver south along PAAL. Not adequate. DS 6-01.4.1.I. Recommend moving enclosure back 20 ft to allow for safe maneuvering. B. Building #4 will require its own refuse enclosure. 2. DP2.2, Building #6 will require its own refuse enclosure. Enclosures must be positioned within the development so provide a continuous flow of traffic for collection vehicle. DS 6-01.4.1.H. 3. DP1.1. Double and single enclosure detail okay. Please correct on resubmittal. |
| 09/26/2007 | ED ABRIGO | PIMA COUNTY | ASSESSOR | Approv-Cond | Office of the Pima County Assessor 115 N. Church Ave. Tucson, Arizona 85701 BILL STAPLES ASSESSOR TO: CDRC Office Subdivision Review City of Tucson (FAX# 791-5559) FROM: Gary Ault, Mapping Supervisor Pima County Assessor's Office Mapping Department DATE: September 26, 2007 RE: Assessor's Review and Comments Regarding Tentative Plat D07-0014 SORRENTO SQUARE RETAIL CENTER T141526 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * X Plat meets Assessor's Office requirements. _______ Plat does not meet Assessor's Office requirements. COMMENTS: PLEASE MAKE THE FOLLOWING ADJUSTMENTS BY FINAL PLAT STAGE: 1. NAME OF SUB WITH LOT #'S, COMMON AREAS,BLOCKS, TOWNSHIP,RANGE AND SECTION SHOULD BE NOTED IN THE TITLE BLOCK ON EACH SHEET. 2. ADD MILES OF NEW STREETS TO GENERAL NOTES EVEN IF IT IS ZERO. 3. PARCEL BOUNDARIES SHOULD BE DEFINED WITH SOLID LINES INCLUDING COMMON AREAS. 4. ADD DIMS AND BEARINGS FOR ALL PARCEL LINES AND CURVE DATA FOR ALL CURVES. 5. IDENTIFY ADJOINING AREA EAST OF SUB AS "UNSUBDIVIDED". THANK YOU FOR YOUR SUBMITTAL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CALL ROSANNA WERNER AT 740-4390 NOTE: THE ASSESSOR'S CURRENT INVOLVEMENT IN PROCESSING ITS MANUAL MAPS TO DIGITAL FORMAT IS EXPEDITED GREATLY BY EXCHANGE OF DIGITAL DATA. IN THE COURSE OF RECORDING THIS SUBDIVISION YOUR ASSISTANCE IN PROVIDING THIS OFFICE WITH AN AUTOCAD COPY WOULD BE GREATLY APPRECIATED. THANK YOU FOR ANY DIGITAL DATA PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED. ROSANNA WERNER |
| 09/26/2007 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES September 26, 2007 Thomas Sayler-Brown SBBL Architecture and Planning 1001 North Alvernon Way, Suite 105 Tucson, Arizona 85711 Subject: D07-0014 Sorrento Square Retail Center Development Plan Dear Thomas: Your submittal of August 17, 2007 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 8 Copies Revised Development Plan (Wastewater, Engineering, Zoning, Landscape, DUPD, ESD, Traffic, DSD) 5 Copies Revised Landscape Plan (Engineering, Zoning, Landscape, DUPD, DSD) 2 Copies Revised NPPO Plan (Landscape, DSD) 2 Copies Revised Drainage Report (Engineering, DSD) 2 Copies Cross Parking/Access Agreement (Zoning, DSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4919. Sincerely, Patricia Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 620-0535 |