Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - DEV PLAN
Permit Number - D07-0013
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - DEV PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 09/19/2007 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 09/19/2007 | FRODRIG2 | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Approved | September 19, 2007 To: Steve Wollerman Southwestern Consulting Engineers, Inc. Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department ____________________________________ From: Tom Porter, Sr. CEA (520-740-6579), representing the Pima County Departments of Wastewater Management and Environmental Quality Subject: A-Atlas Discount Storage Development Plan – 3rd Submittal D07-0013 The proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. The Pima County Department of Environmental Quality and Wastewater Management Department hereby approve the above referenced submittal of the development plan as submitted. Please note the following: Approval of the above referenced submittal does not authorize the construction of public or private sewer collection lines, or water distribution lines. Prior to the construction of such features, a Construction Authorization (Approval To Construct) may need to be obtained from the Pima County Environmental Quality. Also, air quality activity permits must be secured by the developer or prime contractor from the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality before constructing, operating or engaging in an activity which may cause or contribute to air pollution. If you have any questions regarding the above mentioned comments, please contact me . |
| 10/03/2007 | KAROL ARAGONEZ | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Karol Aragonez Planner PROJECT: D07-0013 A-Atlas Discount Storage Development Plan Resubmittal TRANSMITTAL DATE: September 27, 2007 DUE DATE: October 17, 2007 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. Parking calculation still does not add up to what is shown on the DP. The total number of parking spaces now shown on the plan (243), the number of parking indicates on the cover sheet drawing (250), and the number of spaces provided in the parking calculations for both industrial and commercial uses (246) do not match. Please make the calculations and cover sheet count match to what is proposed on the DP. Please make sure that the counts provided within the circles matches what is shown on the plan. Some of them do not match. 2. A five (5) foot pedestrian refuge area that includes a four (4) foot physically separate sidewalk is required between any structure and a PAAL. This has not been provided as indicated in the response letter along the south side of Building 19. DS 3-05.2.2.B.1 3. The pedestrian path still angles in front of the dumpster east of building 6. Since pedestrian connectivity is provided to the north of the dumpster in front of building 7 the pedestrian paths angled in front of the dumpster is to be removed. 4. Please dimension the back-up spur at the end of row parking between buildings 7 and 10. The three (3) foot radii was shown but the spur depth of three (3) feet and the additional three (3) foot separation provided so vehicles do not extend unto the sidewalk area and potentially hit a pedestrian was not shown. Please provide. DS 3-05.2.2.D 5. Please add ten (10) foot dimension to the end parking space on the west abutting the security fence in the personal storage parking area and the parking space next to the dumpster west of building 10 north of the bicycle parking spaces. DS 3-05.2.1.B.3 6. In personal storage parking calculations please label required accessible space as "van accessible". 7. Please revise bicycle parking calculation. Other uses being proposed (Buildings and Grounds Maintenance, Funeral Services, Research and Development, Technical Service, and Trade Service and Repair Minor) require that the entire eight (8) percent be all Class 2. Revise bicycle parking calculation to twenty (20) spaces are to be required as Class 2 and eighteen (18) spaces Class 1 for a total of thirty-eight (38) spaces required and provide revised number of provided spaces. Break down the bicycle parking requirements as required for each principal use grouping that utilizes the same bicycle parking calculation. For example: Craftswork, general manufacturing, precision manufacturing, Processing and cleaning - 8%, 90% Class 1, 10% Class 2 Building and grounds maintenance, construction services, funeral service, research and product development, technical service, trade service and repair minor - 8% all Class 2 LUC 3.3.4 8. Bicycle parking provided on the DP does not meet the requirements of DS 2-09. Per DS 2-09.4.1 Class 2 bicycle parking facilities will be located no more than fifty (50) feet from the main building entrance(s) and will be along the front side of the building as well as along other sides of the building that has an entrance. This comment pertains to buildings 1-10. The bicycle parking depicted on the plan is clumped together and does not provide even distribution to buildings 1-10. Spaces provided in the parking area between buildings 6 and 10 are not within fifty (50) feet of any of the structures surrounding it. Please revise locations of Class 2 spaces. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Karol Aragonez, (520) 837-4960. KAA S:\zoning review\karol\planning\cdrc\developmentplan\D07-0013dpr1.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development plan and additional requested documents. |
| 10/05/2007 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | Offsite sewer and drainage easements may not be cleared until compliance with the Native Plant Preservation regulations has been verified. The Plant Inventory does not indicate the location and number (if any) of plants in these offsite easements. |
| 10/12/2007 | ANDY VERA | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Approved | 1. FOR FUTURE REFERNCE....Sheet C-14, Refuse gate, needs to state "positive locking and bayonet anchors" (not angles). |
| 10/12/2007 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES October 12, 2007 Steve Wollerman Southwestern Consulting Engineers, LLC 435 East 9th Street Tucson, Arizona 85705 Subject: D07-0013 A-Atlas Discount StorageDevelopment Plan Dear Steve: Your submittal of September 19, 2007 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 3 Copies Revised Development Plan (Landscape, Zoning, DSD) 3 Copies Revised Landscape Plan (Landscape, Zoning, DSD) 2 Copies Revised NPPO Plan (Landscape, DSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4919. Sincerely, Patricia Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 628-1062 |