Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Permit Number - D07-0013
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 03/29/2007 | FRODRIG2 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 04/02/2007 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | NO COMMENT D07-0013 SOUTHWESTERN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, L.L.C. A-ATLAS DISCOUNT STORAGE -------------------------------------------------------- Confidentiality and Nondisclosure Notice: This email transmission and any attachments are intended for use by the person(s)/entity(ies) named above and may contain confidential/privileged information. Any unauthorized use, disclosure or distribution is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by email, and delete or destroy all copies plus attachments. |
| 04/02/2007 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 04/12/2007 | PAUL MACHADO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | To: Patricia Gehlen DATE: June 15, 2007 CDRC/Zoning Manager FROM: Paul Machado Engineering Division SUBJECT: A-Atlas Storage, 8300 E. Valencia Rd. Development Plan D07-0013 (First Review) T15S, R15E, Section 21 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Development Plan and Drainage Report. The Development Plan (DP) and Drainage Report (DR) cannot be approved as submitted. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal. Development Plan: 1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the DP. 2. There is a W.A.S.H. wash and an Intermediate Xeroraparian Habitat Ovenlay Zone on the property. An overlay zone submittal will be required through the zoning division. Contact Patricia Gehlen for overlay review requirements at 873-4919. The Overlay activity number must be noted in the lower right corner of each sheet of the tentative plat, landscape, and NPPO plans. All required elements of the W.A.S.H and Intermediate Xeroraparian Habitat as shown on the approved Overlay Zone plans must be added to the tentative plat, along with date of approval and any conditions placed on that approval. The tentative plat may not be approved prior to Overlay Zone application approval. (LUC 2.8.2) (LUC 2.8.1) (D.S. 2-12) (D.S. 9-04). 3. As per the Federal ADA requirements, all wheel chair ramps shall have the truncated domes instead of the standard grooves that are shown on COT SD 207. Aside from the Truncated Domes, all wheel chair ramps shall be constructed 4. Label existing and future sight visibility triangles per D.S. 2-02.2.1.10. 5. Show all points of egress and ingress including locations and width of driveways and parking area access lanes (P.A.A.L.) per D.S. 2-02.2.1.11. 6. Please label all vehicular, bicycle, pedestrian, and handicapped circulation clearly identified per D.S. 2-02.2.1.12. 7. Fully-dimensioned loading space(s) and maneuvering area(s) per D.S. 2-02.2.1.14. 8. Show the limits of the 100-year floodplain and water surface elevation per D.S. 2-02.2.1.15. 9. Please provide Drainage patterns and finished grades per D.S. 2-02.2.1.16. 10. Please list estimated cut & fill quantities per D.S. 2-02.2.1.17. 11. Please show dimensioned right-of-way, including any applicable Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Plan right-of-way per D.S. 2-02.2.1.19. 12. All easement of record must be graphically shown on the plan together with recording docket and page per D.S. 2-02.2.1.20. 13. Add the basin(s) maintenance responsibility note per S.M.D.D.F.M. 2.3.1.6 C 1 and 2 to the DP. 14. Dimension from street monument lines to existing and proposed curbs, sidewalks, driveways, and utility lines per D.S. 2-02.2.1.21. 15. Location and orientation of existing major physical features, such as railroad tracks and drainageways per D.S. 2-02.2.1.22. 16. Please provide existing topographic contours at intervals not exceeding two (2) feet and/or spot elevations as pertinent and Bench Mark based on City of Tucson Datum, including City Field Book and page number per D.S. 2-02.2.1.23. 17. Show all fences, walls, or vegetation for screening and sight visibility by type, material, height, location and spacing per D.S. 2-02.2.1.27. 18. Show Development plan number (D07-0013) on all sheets per D.S. 2-02.2.1.29. 19. Show refuse container location, size, and access thereto fully dimensioned per D.S. 2-02.2.1.32 and D.S. 6-01.0. 20. A permit or a private improvement agreement will be necessary for any work performed within the Right-of-way. Contact Permits and Codes at (520) 791-5100 for permit information. 21. Please show the proposed roof drainage patterns, 100% of the 10-year flow must be conveyed under the sidewalks including any other site drainage as well. Please provide supporting calculations to demonstrate compliance with D.S. 3-01.4.4. If the location(s) of the roof scuppers have not yet been decided, a general note indicating sidewalk scuppers will be used when the roof scuppers locations have been designed and located will suffice. 22. Add note: "Depress all landscaped areas 6" maximum for water harvesting". 23. "A grading permit and Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans (SWPPP's) will be required for this project. Submit 3 sets of grading and SWPPP's with text, upon completion and submittal of a grading permit application. A grading permit may not be issued prior to site plan approval. Subsequent comments may be necessary, depending upon the nature and extent of revisions that occur to the plans". Drainage Report: 1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the DR. 2. This review was performed for Tentative Plat purposes only. Final review and acceptance will done at the grading plan stage. 3. There is a W.A.S.H. wash and an Intermediate Xeroraparian Habitat Ovenlay Zone on the property. An overlay zone submittal will be required through the zoning division. Contact Patricia Gehlen for overlay review requirements at 873-4919. The Overlay activity number must be noted in the lower right corner of each sheet of the tentative plat, landscape, and NPPO plans. All required elements of the W.A.S.H and Intermediate Xeroraparian Habitat as shown on the approved Overlay Zone plans must be added to the tentative plat, along with date of approval and any conditions placed on that approval. The tentative plat may not be approved prior to Overlay Zone application approval. (LUC 2.8.2) (LUC 2.8.1) (D.S. 2-12) (D.S. 9-04). 4. If data from the Master Drainage Report for Rita Ranch was used than a statement in the DR will have to be added indicating that you have reviewed the data and agree with it's data. 5. The project is in a balanced basin and no drainage facilities have been built that were shown on the Master Drainage Report for Rita Ranch at this time. Therefore a permanent basin will be required. 6. Show the project address or administration address on the cover sheet of the DS. 7. If applicable, add the basin(s) maintenance responsibility note and checklist per S.M.D.D.F.M. 2.3.1.6 C 1 and 2 to the DR. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 837-4932 or Paul.Machado@ci.tucsonaz.govs Paul P. Machado Senior Engineering Associate City of Tucson/Development Services Department 201 N. Stone Avenue P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210 (520) 791-5550 x1193 office (520) 879-8010 fax C:/8300 E. Valencia Rd. CDRC |
| 04/13/2007 | JOSE ORTIZ | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | |
| 04/20/2007 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Approved | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN COMMENTS Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT D07-0013 A-Atlas Discount Storage 04/19/07 (XXXX) Tentative Plat () Development Plan (XXXX) Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment (XXXX) Other - NPPO CROSS REFERENCE: C9-84-84 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Esmond Station GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: COMMENTS DUE BY: 04/26/07 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment (XXXX) Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies with Plan Policies () See Additional Comments Attached () No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: () Resubmittal Required: () Tentative Plat () Development Plan () Landscape Plan () Other REVIEWER: drcorral 791-4505 DATE: 04/16/07 |
| 04/23/2007 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | 4350 E. Irvington Road, Tucson, AZ 85714 Post Office Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702 WR#179710 April 23, 2007 Dear Mr. Wollerman : SUBJECT: A-ATLAS DISCOUNT STORAGE D07-0013 Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the development plan submitted April 5, 2007. It appears that there are no conflicts with the existing facilities within the boundaries of this proposed development. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. In order to apply for electric service, call the New Construction Department at (520) 918-8300. Submit a final set of plans including approved site, offsite and electrical load plans. Include a CD with the AutoCAD version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Your final plans should be sent to: Tucson Electric Power Company Attn: Ms. Mary Boice New Business Project Manager P. O. Box 711 (DB-101) Tucson, AZ 85702 520-917-8732 Please call the area Designer Michael Riesgo at (520) 917-8764, should you have any questions. Sincerely, Henrietta Noriega Office Specialist Design/Build hn Enclosures cc: M. Riesgo, Tucson Electric Power P. Gehlen, City of Tucson (Email) |
| 04/24/2007 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: D07-0013 A-ATLAS DISCOUNT STORAGE/DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE: April 24, 2007 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: Delete Strickland Dr on sheets 1 and 2. (Streets cannot be named through the Development Plan process.) Provide a copy of the recorded deed for a parcel split prior to approval of this project. jg |
| 04/24/2007 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Refer to the sign code for regulations affecting the billboard proposed near Valencia Road. Any allowed billboards are required to include landscaping and screening per LUC Table 3.7.2-I. 2) Revise the development plan to clarify the number and location of parking spaces. The plans show more spaces than the number provided in the calculations. 3) Provide canopy trees per LUC Table 3.7.2.3.A for all provided parking spaces. Storage spaces are exempt. The development and landscape plans are required to distinguish between provided parking spaces and storage spaces. 4) Revise the label for the detention basin. It is only temporary if a subsequent plan supercedes the current design. 5) Provide fifty percent vegetative coverage for development proposed along Strickland Drive. LUC 3.7.2.4.A.5 6) Revise the native plant preservation plans to show/identify the limits of grading. DS 2-15.3.4.A Include limits around individual PIP's. 7) Revise the Overview section on sheet N-1. It appears that Cercidium microphyllum is predominate. 8) A vehicular use area must be provided with post barricades or wheel stop curbing designed to prevent parked vehicles from extending beyond the property lines, damaging adjacent landscaping and to prevent vehicles from driving onto unimproved portions of the site per DS 3-05.2.3.C. Revise the plans as necessary to provide the barrier for the portion of the vehicular use area abutting the Old Vail Road street landscape border and others where necessary. 9) Revise the plans to provide a 6' high screen for outdoor storage areas within 100 feet of Commercially zoned property and Old Vail Road. LUC Table 3.7.2-I. 10) Revise the landscape plan to show the extent of supplementary irrigation in each planting area provided by water harvesting methods. Show the amount and disposition of flow and indicate drainage points from buildings and paved areas. DS 2-07.2.2.C Grading, hydrology, and landscape structural plans are to be integrated to make maximum use of site storm water runoff for supplemental on-site irrigation purposes. The landscape plan shall indicate use of all runoff, from individual catch basins around single trees to basins accepting flow from an entire vehicular use area or roof area. LUC 3.7.4.3.B http://dot.tucsonaz.gov/stormwater/downloads/2006WaterHarvesting.pdf 11) Add the CDRC case number and any related case numbers to the landscape and native plant preservation plans. DS 2-07.2.1.B 12) Provide details/dimensions for tree planters between bldgs. 9 & 10 and east of building 6. Provide a detail for the standard planter also. DS 2-07.2.2.A.2.d 13) The plants proposed to meet the screening requirements should provide a continuous barrier at the required height. Caesalpinia pulcherrima and Calliandra californica do not always meet the standards due to growth habits, seasonal variations, and maintenance practices. Revise the plans to ensure complete screening. DS 2-06.3.5.A RESUBMITTAL OF ALL PLANS IS REQUIRED |
| 04/25/2007 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | DATE: April 24, 2007 TO: Ferne Rodriguez, Development Services FROM: Glenn Hicks Parks and Recreation 791-4873 ext. 215 Glenn.Hicks@tucsonaz.gov CC: Patricia Gehlen SUBJECT: D07-0013 A-Atlas Discount Storage: Development Plan Parks and Recreation has no comments |
| 04/27/2007 | TIM ROWE | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | April 26, 2007 To: Steve Wollerman Southwestern Consulting Engineers, Inc. Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department ____________________________________ From: Tom Porter, Sr. CEA (520-740-6579), representing the Pima County Departments of Wastewater Management and Environmental Quality Subject: A-Atlas Discount Storage Development Plan – 1st Submittal D07-0013 The proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. Obtain a letter from the PCWMD's Development Services Section, written within the past 90 days, stating that treatment and conveyance system capacity for the project is available in the downstream public sewerage system and provide a copy of that letter to this office. The required form to request such a letter may be found at: http://www.pima.gov/wwm/forms/docs/CapResponseRequest.pdf. The development plan for this project cannot be approved until a copy of this letter has been received by this office. All Sheets: Add the case number, D07-0013, to the title block of each sheet. This number should be shown larger or bolder than any cross reference numbers. No wastewater review fees will be charged for sheets where this is the only required revision. Sheet 1: Show the existing and proposed private sewer lines using different line-types, so that they can readily be distinguished from each other. Also, show and describe examples of these different line types in the legend on Sheet 1. Sheet 1: Revise Note No. 8 to read as follows: THE ON-SITE SANITARY SEWERS WILL BE PRIVATE AND WILL BE CONSTRUCTED, OPERATED AND MAINTAINED ON A PRIVATE BASIS, AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH AN APPROVED OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE PLAN, IF REQUIRED. THE LOCATION AND METHOD OF CONNECTION TO AN EXISTING PUBLIC SANITARY SEWER IS SUBJECT TO REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT. Sheet 1: Revise Note No. 14 to read as follows: THIS PROJECT WILL HAVE ______ EXISTING AND______ PROPOSED WASTEWATER FIXTURE UNIT EQUIVALENTS PER TABLE 13.20.045(E)(1) IN PIMA COUNTY CODE 13.20.045(E). And fill in the blanks with the appropriate values. Sheet 1: Add a Permitting Note that states: A PROJECT CONSTRUCTION PERMIT MUST BE SECURED FROM PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT BEFORE BEGINNING ANY WORK ON THIS PROJECT. Sheet 2: Show pipe size/slope/length and material type for all BCS connections. Must have a minimum of 2% slope. Sheet 2: The BCS for Bldg #7 is shown as coming into MH#6 at an acute angle. Revise the BCS to go directly into the 8” sewer line at 90°. The same applies for the following buildings: #5, #4, #3, #2 and #1. Sheet 2: Please verify record of the existing private sewer shown on the plan. Sheet 2: Show the sewer line on plan from MH#5 to MH#4. Sheet 2: Revise the placement on plan for MH #3 rim and invert elevations to be shown together with the manhole number instead of separate. Sheet 2: Bldg. #11 appears to have no BCS connection. Sheet 2 & 3: The length of pipe and slope for existing private sewer are not clearly marked on plan. Revise to show more clearly on plan. Sheet 2 & 3: Mark the existing 8” sewer as PRIVATE. Sheet 2 & 3: Label all cleanouts clearly with rim and invert elevations. Keynote no. 24 appears to be pointing to cleanouts in front of Bldg #1 and there is no detail HF on sheet 5. This office will require a revised set of blue lines, and a response letter, addressing these comments. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. Pima County Code Title 13.20.030.A.2 requires that a wastewater review fee be paid for each submittal of the development plan. The fee for the first submittal is $166 plus $50 per sheet. For the second submittal, the review fee is $50 per sheet. For all subsequent submittals, the review fee is $39 per sheet. The next submittal of this project will be the 2nd submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $150 (made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER) must accompany the revised set of blue lines and response letter. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. If you have any questions regarding the above mentioned comments, please contact me . |
| 04/30/2007 | ANDY VERA | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Keynote #7 on page 3 states "new trash enclosure" but it is not identified/noted on plan. Provide proper identification referencing each trash enclosure within DP. 2. DP appears to identify 3 single enclosures for bldgs 1 thru 5 and one single plus one double enclosue for bldgs 6 thru 10. If the RV parking, contractors yard and the self storage are going to be under separate ownership/mgt from buildings 1 thru 10, each will also require its own refuse enclosure. Clarify. * Single enclosures between bldgs 2 & 3 and north of bldg 5 will need to be positioned at 30 degree or 45 degree angles in order to allow a continous flow for the service vehicle within the development. Per DS 6-01.4.1.H Each enclosure area will require a 14ft X 40ft clear approach. Per DS 6-014.1.C Encosure between bldg 1 & 2 is adequate as is. * Enclossure detail needs to provide a 10ft INSIDE clear between the side wall protectors and between the rear wall protector and the front gates. Detail demonstrates the 10ft clear area measured at the center of the wall protector. Also, enclosure door frame needs to be noted as "3x3x1/4 steel angle" not anchor. The enclosure gates must be constructed with the ability to secure them when open. Per DS 6.01.4.2.4 Recommend adding notes referencing "a quantity of (4) galvanized pipe 1in. diameter and 6 in. long, that will be flush w/concrete". Purpose is to allow the anchors to be placed into the galvanized sleeves in order to secure the gates in the closed and open positions. Correct resubmittal. |
| 04/30/2007 | FRODRIG2 | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Approved | No comment |
| 05/01/2007 | ED ABRIGO | PIMA COUNTY | ASSESSOR | Passed | |
| 05/01/2007 | PGEHLEN1 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Passed | |
| 05/01/2007 | PGEHLEN1 | TUCSON WATER NEW AREA DEVELOPMENT | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 05/02/2007 | KAROL ARAGONEZ | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Karol Aragonez Planner PROJECT: D07-0013 A-Atlas Discount Storage Development Plan TRANSMITTAL DATE: May 1, 2007 DUE DATE: April 26, 2007 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is March 29, 2008. 2. Within the title block please remove "Contractors Yard" as per our discussions. DS 2-05.2.1.G.1 3. Uses that are indicated on the development plan must meet minimum motor vehicle and bicycle parking, off-street loading, and AEZ criteria. From the list of proposed uses and parking calculations, please remove the following uses: Salvaging, Communication, Daycare, and Trade Service and Repair Major. These uses will require additional parking and/or special requirements to be done to the site which currently cannot be met as drawn. The applicant had expressed a desire to provide "Contractor's Yards". By the City's definition and the use described by the applicant this use would actually be "Commercial Storage". Parking calculations for this use would need to be provided. Per LUC Section 3.3.4 Storage Use Group, Commercial Storage requires one (1) space per five thousand (5000) sq. ft. of GFA plus one (1) space per five thousand (5000) sq. ft. of outdoor storage area for the first twenty thousand (20,000) of outdoor storage area plus one (1) space per ten thousand (10,000) sq. ft. of outdoor storage area for over twenty thousand (20,000) sq. ft. of outdoor storage area. The area of the site dedicated to commercial storage will need to provide separate calculations for motor vehicle and bicycle parking to demonstrate zoning compliance. Separate calculations for commercial storage shall also include those for bicycle parking and off-street loading based on area dedicated to the use. Landscape requirements will also be affected. 4. Please remove the words "Lot" from the commercial storage area. This would infer that the site was being subdivided into separate lots. 5. Please list annexation case number C9-84-84 in the lower right corner of the plan. List all applicable conditions of annexation on the development plan. Provide a separate response letter indicating compliance to applicable conditions of annexation as provided for in Ordinance 6143. DS 2-05.2.1.K, DS 2-05.2.2.B.7 & DS 2-05.2.4.U 6. Please clarify what case number S-84-06 is in lower right corner of development plan. If there is no significance please remove. 7. Case number D07-0013 has been assigned to this development plan (DP). Please place this number in the right corner of all sheets of the development plan, landscape plan, NPPO, and any other associated sheets. DS 2-05.2.2.B.2 8. Please provide a copy of the approved lot split, S06-043. DS 2-05.2.4.A 9. Please combine general notes 19, 25, and 26 into one note that reads "The project is designed to meet the overlay zones criteria: Sec. 2.8.3, Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Setback Zone; Sec. 2.8.4, Gateway Corridor Zone; and Sec. 2.8.5, Airport Environs Zone (AEZ)". DS 2-05.2.2.B.10 10. Please draw all existing easements on the plan along with recordation information, location, width, and purpose. If an easement is no longer in use and scheduled to be vacated or has been abandoned, so indicate. If none exist provide response to reviewer's comments. Also if easements are purposed please draw, dimension and label as to their purpose and whether they will be public or private. If none exist provide response to reviewer's comments. DS 2-05.2.3.B & DS 2-05.2.4.G 11. Please provide an ingress/egress easement for the entrance street (Strickland Drive). If done as a private street a common area would have to be created which would require the site to be developed as subdivision with both a tentative and final plat. 12. Please provide a cross access and parking agreement between the project site and properties to the west and south. This is required even if same owner owns properties. 13. Please provide the dimensioned width of pavement, curbs and sidewalks within Valencia and Old Vail Roads. Also provide for both streets the recordation data. DS 2-05.2.3.C 14. All new streets proposed, whether public or private, shall be designed in accordance with Development Standards 3-01.0 and based on the ADT projected for the project. Please verify with City Engineering on the specific cross section that will be required and revise cross-sections A/5, E/5, and H/5. ADTs of over 1000 are required to use DS 3-01.10.0 Figure 5, which includes parking lanes, twelve (12) foot travel lanes, five (5) foot wide sidewalks, and vertical curbing, totaling fifty-six (56) feet. 15. Provide a five (5) foot sidewalk and access ramps on the north side of Strickland between the road and parking spaces between buildings 6 and 10. Ramp connections must then be installed on opposite corners to provide continuous pedestrian path. 16. Within all details provided on sheet 5 of 6, two (2) foot wedge curbs are to be replaced with six (6) inch vertical curbing in order to provide a physical separation between the PAAL and pedestrian path. DS 2-08.4.1 17. The total number of parking spaces shown on the plan (255) and the number of spaces provided in the parking calculations for both industrial and commercial uses and personal storage (261) do not match. Please revise. 18. Per detail R/4 and P/4 parking spaces are to be twenty (20) feet long. For consistency, please make sure this length is provided in all applicable cross-sections on sheet 5 of 6, specifically cross-section E/5, H/5, I/5, K/5, and L/5. 19. Please verify that all personal storage units have direct vehicular access. If they do not the parking requirement will be one (1) space per four thousand (4000) sq. ft. of GFA. This is also true for off-street loading requirements for personal storage. If all units must have direct access off-street loading is not required. 20. As an FYI this site would qualify for a parking reduction under LUC Sec. 3.3.5.1 where the required number of parking spaces is ninety (90) percent of the sum of the amount required for each separate principal use 21. All sidewalks (except along Strickland Drive) will be a minimum of four (4) feet in width and be installed to avoid any obstruction, which decreases the minimum width to less than four (4) feet. Please revise cross-section D/5. DS 2-08.5.1.A 22. Sidewalks or pedestrian refuges areas may not be located between the vehicle use area within the building and the drive entrance into the building space and also to off-street loading spaces for Buildings 2, 9, and 10. This creates an unsafe situation for pedestrians. Please relocate overhead door entrances for buildings 1-10. DS 2-08.4.1.F 23. Pedestrian paths angled behind parking spaces, dumpsters and off-street loading spaces create an unsafe walking environment for pedestrians. Please reconfigure crosswalks so they do not angle behind spaces and dumspters. 24. Please correct the PAAL width in cross-section G/5. The half PAAL is shown as twelve (12) feet but the overall dimension is thirty (30) feet. 25. Please dimension all PAAL and vehicular spaces within the vehicle storage area. Angled spaces and PAALs must be conformance to LUC Table 3.3.7-I 26. A one-way PAAL within a development for storage must be a minimum of twenty (20) feet in width, with a minimum four (4) foot wide pedestrian refuge areas delineated on one (1) side of the PAAL. A two-way PAAL within a development for storage must be a minimum of thirty (30) feet in width, with a minimum four (4) foot wide pedestrian refuge area delineated on one (1) side of the PAAL. The cross sections provided (J/5) shows the pedestrian refuge area within the PAAL. The refuge is to be exclusive of the PAAL. Please revise. LUC 3.3.7.2.C.4 27. Please add a four (4) foot sidewalk and six (6) inch vertical curb and required handicap access ramps to pedestrian path that runs parallel to and abutting parking spaces between building 9 and 10. 28. Please add a crosswalk connection and access ramp to connect the personal storage to building 10. 29. Please remove access ramp and sidewalk at northwest corner of building 1. It does not provide a safe connection. 30. A five (5) foot pedestrian refuge area that includes a four (4) foot physically separate sidewalk is required between any structure and a PAAL. Please provide along the south side of Building 19. DS 3-05.2.2.B.1 31. A four (4) foot sidewalk is required between any parking space and a structure. Please add sidewalk to east side of Building 2-3, and 11 and provide striped pedestrian refuge along front of storage units along south. DS 2-08.4.1.C 32. Please provide a connection between Building 19 to the storage units and between each units along the northern portions of Buildings 12-18. Please relabel the most eastern self-storage building from 17 to 18. DS 2-08.3.1 33. A minimum two (2) foot distance must be maintained between a PAAL and any wall, screen, or other obstruction. Please provide along twenty (20) foot PAAL on west side of self-storage units. DS 3-05.2.2.B.3 34. Please provide the access ramp on detail R/6. Curb ramps shall be a minimum of three (3) feet in width, exclusive of flared sides. The curb ramp flares shall not be steeper than 1:10. Counter slopes of adjoining gutters and road surfaces immediately adjacent to the curb ramp shall not be steeper than 1:20. The adjacent surfaces at transitions at curb ramps to walks, gutters and streets shall be at the same level. All slopes are to be indicated on the plan/plat and associated details. The area covered by the truncated domes shall be twenty-four (24) inch deep and extend the full width of the crosswalk, preceding the crosswalk, including access aisles of handicapped motor vehicle parking spaces. ANSI 406.2, 3, & 4 35. Please provide van accessible ramp widths in detail R/6. Access aisle for van accessibility space is eight (8) feet. 36. Please dimension the back-up spur at the end of row parking between buildings 7 and 10. The spur will be a minimum of three (3) feet in depth, will have a three (3) foot radii, and will have a wheel barrier to prevent encroachment onto sidewalk. And additional three (3) foot separation should be provided so vehicles do not extend unto the sidewalk area and potentially hit a pedestrian. DS 3-05.2.2.D 37. The two end parking spaces abutting the security fence in the personal storage parking area must be a minimum of ten (10) feet in width to allow passenger s to enter and exit their vehicles. DS 3-05.2.1.B.3 38. Please provide all perimeter dimensions from property line to edge of structure. More specifically dimensions are need from the west property line to buildings 1-8, from the corners of building 17 and 19 to the northeast property line, and from buildings 1 and 20 to the south property line. DS 2-05.2.4.I 39. Please provide heights and dimension all building footprints within the project site. Provide the square footage and dimensions of the commercial storage units. DS 2-05.2.4.N 40. In industrial services/commercial services group parking calculations please add that of the nine (9) HC spaces provided two (2) will be "van accessible". Accessible spaces and access aisles shall be a minimum of sixteen (16) feet in width total. 41. In personal storage parking calculations please label required accessible space as "van accessible". Accessible space and access aisle shall be a minimum of sixteen (16) feet in width total. 42. Please provide bicycle parking calculations for commercial storage. Eight (8) percent of the provided motor vehicle parking spaces shall be bicycle parking. Of that amount ninety (90) percent shall be Class 1 and ten (10) percent shall be Class 2. 43. Please correct bicycle parking calculations for industrial and commercials group. Eight (8) percent of provided parking would require a total of twenty (20) bicycle parking spaces, of which, eighteen (18) would be Class 1 and two (2) would be Class 2. Because other uses being proposed require that the entire eight (8) percent be all Class 2, twenty (20) spaces are to be required as Class 2 and eighteen (18) spaces Class 1 for a total of thirty-eight (38) spaces required. Please add bicycle parking requirements as required for each principal use grouping that utilizes the same bicycle parking calculation. For example: General manufacturing, craftswork, precision manufacturing - 8%, 90% Class 1, 10% Class 2 Building and grounds maintenance, construction services, funeral services - 8% all Class 2 LUC 3.3.4 44. Please provide a detail of the Class 1 bicycle parking area that will be provided within each building and/or provide a detail of typical bicycle locker and locations. See DS 2-09.8.0 Figure 1 for acceptable bike locker designs. Please revise Class 1 note concerning location of spaces. To allow any use within buildings 1-10, each building must contain an area for Class 1 spaces. Lockers distributes throughout complex could require less spaces can be provided. 45. Bicycle parking provided on the DP does not meet the requirements of DS 2-09. Per DS 2-09.4.1 Class 2 bicycle parking facilities will be located no more than fifty (50) feet from the main building entrance(s) and will be along the front side of the building as well as along other sides of the building that has an entrance. Bicycle access through the development will be separate from the pedestrian ways. Vehicular access may be used as bicycle access. Bicycle access to a parking facility may cross a pedestrian way at a right angle (DS2-09.3.2). This comment pertains to buildings 1-10 and commercial storage area. 46. Please revise general note 12 to provide proposed maximum height of all structures on site as defined by development designator "34". 47. Please add the off-street loading requirements for industrial and commercial group per Table 3 (LUC 3.4.5.3), one (1) space required for GFA between 1,500-10,000 sq. ft. to show that this requirement is being met. Also provide the required length and wide of both spaces and indicate that the most restrictive is being used. LUC 3.4.5.1 & LUC 3.4.5.3 48. Please revise outdoor use area for buildings 1-10. It appears that some of these areas show space that is unusable (sloped areas, landscaped areas, small spaces around loading spaces). Please refine. If used as presented some building will be required to provide two (2) off-street loading spaces as required by Table 3 (LUC 3.4.5.3) when outdoor area is divided among building groupings. 49. Additional off-street loading will be required for commercial storage based on area dedicated to the use. Please provide separate calculation for this principal use. 50. Please place bollards to separate loading areas from pedestrian sidewalks for buildings 2-5 to prevent trucks from backing over sidewalk area. 51. The site does not appear to provide for refuse collection for buildings 1-5. Please show all dumpster locations, screening locations and materials, and vehicle maneuvering areas, fully dimensioned. DS 2-05.2.4.T 52. Please indicate the location and type of postal service to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements. If mail is to be delivered to an area within a building please state so on the plan. DS 2-05.2.4.V 53. Indicate the locations and types of proposed signs (wall, freestanding, pedestal) to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements and that minimal locational requirements can be met. Also indicate if there are existing billboards on site. Existing and proposed billboards will be required to meet all LUC requirements as stated in LUC Sec. 3.5.4.26. Staff recommends the removal of any proposed billboards because of the additional landscaping, pedestrian, parking, and off-street loading that will be required DS 2-05.2.4.W & LUC 3.5.4.26 54. Please list as separate notes all subject to requirements for commercial storage as provided in LUC Sec. 3.5.10.1 55. Please clarify if motor vehicle and RV storage is part of personal storage or commercial storage and label. If defined, as part of commercial storage, outdoor storage is not allowed in a street perimeter yard (Old Vail Road) and would be required to be removed. LUC 3.5.10.1.B 56. Please list as separate notes all subject to requirements for craftswork, general manufacturing, precision manufacturing, processing and cleaning as provided in LUC Sec. 3.5.5.1.B, F, G, & H. 57. All changes, modifications, and/or corrections must be made on all applicable plans including the development plan, landscape plan, and NPPO. Once changes, modifications, and/or corrections are made and reviewed further comments may result. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Karol Aragonez, (520) 791-5550, ext. 74960. KAA S:\zoning review\karol\planning\cdrc\developmentplan\D07-0013dp.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development plan and additional requested documents. |
| 06/18/2007 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES June 18, 2007 Steve Wollerman Southwestern Consulting Engineers, LLC 435 East 9th Street Tucson, Arizona 85705 Subject: D07-0013 A-Atlas Discount StorageDevelopment Plan Dear Steve: Your submittal of March 30, 2007 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 7 Copies Revised Development Plan (Engineering, Landscape, Addressing, Wastewater, ESD, Zoning, DSD) 4 Copies Revised Landscape Plan (Engineering, Landscape, Zoning, DSD) 2 Copies Revised NPPO Plan (Landscape, DSD) 2 Copies Revised Drainage Report (Engineering, DSD) 2 Copies Approved Lot Split Documents (Zoning, DSD) 2 Copies Cross Access and Parking Agreement (Zoning, DSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 791-5608 extension 1179. Sincerely, Patricia Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 628-1062 |