Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - DEV PLAN
Permit Number - D07-0012
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - DEV PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06/29/2007 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 07/02/2007 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | >>> FireDSC FireDSC 07/02/2007 9:21 AM >>> The resubmittal is approved, July 2, 2007. |
| 07/05/2007 | CDRC1 | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | July 3, 2007 To: Pattie Davis, PSOMAS, Inc. Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department ____________________________________ From: Tom Porter, Sr. CEA (520-740-6579), representing the Pima County Departments of Wastewater Management and Environmental Quality Subject: Hampton Inn Development Plan - 2nd Submittal D07-0012 The proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. 1. Obtain a letter from the PCWMD's Development Services Section, written within the past 90 days, stating that treatment and conveyance system capacity for the project is available in the downstream public sewerage system and provide a copy of that letter to this office. The required form to request such a letter may be found at: http://www.pima.gov/wwm/forms/docs/CapResponseRequest.pdf. The development plan for this project cannot be approved until a copy of this letter has been received by this office. This office will require a revised set of blue lines, and a response letter, addressing these comments. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. Pima County Code Title 13.20.030.A.2 requires that a wastewater review fee be paid for each submittal of the development plan. The fee for the first submittal is $166 plus $50 per sheet. For the second submittal, the review fee is $50 per sheet. For all subsequent submittals, the review fee is $39 per sheet. The next submittal of this project will be the 3rd submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $39.00 (made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER) must accompany the revised set of blue lines and response letter. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. If you have any questions regarding the above mentioned comments, please contact me . |
| 07/23/2007 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) A screen wall is required along the south boundary of the site per LUC Table 3.7.2-I. Show and label any proposed walls on the development plan. Indicate any provions for drainage flow under or through the wall. 2) Screen the loading area from the R-1 parcel to the south. A 6' high wall is required for loading areas per LUC Table 3.7.2-I. 3) The project appears to impact areas within fifty feet of the Alamo Wash, a watercourse subject to the WASH Ordinance. A separate application may be required see TCC Sec. 29-17. Please contact Patricia Gehlen for additional information. 4) Improvements, such as drainage structures, may not interfere with required maintenance access or with facilities or trail routes recommended by City of Tucson Parks and Recreation. Obtain necessary approvals from Transportation and Parks and Recreation. RESUBMITTAL OF ALL PLANS IS REQUIRED. |
| 07/31/2007 | JOSE ORTIZ | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approv-Cond | July 31, 2007 ACTIVITY NUMBER: D07-0012 PROJECT NAME: Hampton Inn PROJECT ADDRESS: 251 S Wilmot Rd PROJECT REVIEWER: Jose E. Ortiz PE, Traffic Engineer Resubmittal Required: Traffic Engineering recommends a conditional approval of the Development Plan; therefore revisions to the development plan needs to be reflected on the mylars. The following items must be revised or added to the development plan. 1. Include a response letter with the next submittal that states how all comments have been addressed. 2. Provide keynotes calling out the new curb line and pavement for the proposed right turn lane. 3. COT Traffic Engineering prefers not having continuous right turn lanes. In this situation a sub-standard taper and 110' of storage is preferred over the continuous right turn lane. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-4259 x76730 or Jose.Ortiz@tucsonaz.gov |
| 07/31/2007 | KAROL ARAGONEZ | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Karol Aragonez Planner PROJECT: D07-0012 Hampton Inn Development Plan TRANSMITTAL DATE: July 31, 2007 DUE DATE: July 30, 2007 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. Once tax combo is finalized and recorded please provide a copy. This must be done prior to approval of the development plan. 2. Please dimension the PAAL north and south of the main entrance island (canopy entrance). Minimum two-way traffic aisles is twenty-four (24) feet DS 3-05.2.1.C.1 3. The required number of handicap parking spaces for the total number of spaces between 101-150 is five (5) Per 2003 IBC Table 1106.1. Please revise required HC parking space calculation. 4. Class 2 multiple rack spaces will allow a minimum of thirty (30) inches between outer spaces of racks. Please see figure 9 of DS 2-09.8.0. 5. All changes, modifications, and/or corrections must be made on all applicable plans including the development plan, landscape plan, and NPPO. Once changes, modifications, and/or corrections are made and reviewed further comments may result. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Karol Aragonez, (520) 837-4960. KAA S:\zoning review\karol\planning\cdrc\developmentplan\D07-0012dpr.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development plan and additional requested documents. |
| 08/02/2007 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Denied | DATE: August 02, 2007 TO: DSD_CDRC@ tucsonaz.gov FROM: Glenn Hicks Parks and Recreation 791-4873 ext. 215 Glenn.Hicks@tucsonaz.gov SUBJECT: D07-0012 Hampton Inn: Development Plan(6-29-07) Denied. A depressed curb shown at the southeast corner of the site indicates a drainage channel from the parking area to Alamo Wash which will interfere with future trail use. The drainage must be placed below ground and a crossing must be provided over the channel. Provide details as to how this will be accomplished. |
| 08/06/2007 | ANDY VERA | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | 1. Dumpster detail pg 4, G. A. Rear corner bollards need to be positioned 2 ft from the side wall or 4 ft from center of the rear center bollard. B. Outside enclosure deminsion should read 13 ft. 4 in. not 14 ft. 2. Enclosure gates must include the ability to secure the gates in the open position during service and when closed. DS 6-01.4.2.C.4 Demonstrate on detail and annotate " Qty - 4 , 1 in. dia. x 6 in. long galvanized pipe flush w/concrete". Recommend gates be designed to open 180 degrees where possible or minimum 12 ft. 3. Access and approach remains good. Please make corrections on resubmittal. |
| 08/07/2007 | STANTEC | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | July 20, 2007 To: PSOMAS 800 Wetmore Road Suite 110 Tucson, Arizona 85719 Attn: Erin Loudermilk Cc: Jim Vogelsberg, Engineering Division City of Tucson Development Services Department 201 N. Stone Avenue, First Floor Tucson, Arizona 85701 Re: Hampton Inn 251 Wilmot Road City of Tucson No. D07-0012 Stantec Project No. 816-30015 (001) Plan review for the above-referenced project has been completed, per the City of Tucson Land Use Code Supplement 39, City of Tucson Development Standards revised Jan 6, 2000, City of Tucson Standard Manual for Drainage Design and Floodplain Management, Revised July 1998, and other regulations as required. This letter reflects comments to be addressed with a written response to each of the noted items indicating the action taken. In order to facilitate a shorter back-check time, we request that you please provide revised plans and calculations, clouding any changes that have been made. SCOPE OF REVIEW: The scope of this review covers civil engineering. Landscape, zoning and planning reviews are not part of this scope. All features were checked only to the extent allowed by the submittal provided. All portions of the project are assumed to meet or will meet other departmental requirements, conditions and concerns before permit approval. Development Standard 2-05.0 1. Per 2.4.J please provide capacity letter when available. Hydrology: 1. Per hydrology comment 3 in Stantec's letter from April 12, 2007 please address this in more detail per the comment. The south eastern portion of the site is sheet flow over the concrete header to a wall, the south western portion of the site discharges to a splash pad. 2. Per hydrology comment 8 in Stantec's letter from April 12, 2007 please address this in more detail per the comment. -End of Review- If you have any questions, please call (520) 750-7474. Sincerely, Stantec Consulting Inc. Matthew Connors Project Manager MC:mc Attachments: none |
| 08/07/2007 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES August 7, 2007 Pattie Davis PSOMAS 800 East Wetmore Road, Suite 110 Tucson, Arizona 85719 Subject: D07-0012 Hampton Inn Development Plan Dear Pattie: Your submittal of June 29, 2007 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 7 Copies Revised Development Plan (Landscape, Traffic, Zoning, Wastewater, ESD, Parks and Recreation, DSD) 4 Copies Revised Landscape Plan (Landscape, Zoning, Parks and Recreation, DSD) 2 Copies Lot Combo Covenant (Zoning, DSD) PLEASE NOTE THAT THE ENGINEERING REVIEW IS GOING THIRD PARTY REVIEW (STANTEC). THE ABOVE RESUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS DO NOT INCLUDE ITEMS NEEDED FOR THE ENGINEERING REVIEW. Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4919. Sincerely, Patricia Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 292-1290 dp-resubmittal |