Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Permit Number - D07-0010
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 03/23/2007 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 03/26/2007 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | Please contact the Real Estate Division, Jim Rossi at # 791-4181 with regards to the permitted easements in the right of way. Although the PAD 10 calls for a 12' front and a 8' side easement to be permitted into the right of way, the City still needs to address these two easements with some documentation, ie: a Temporary Revocable or a permanent easement. |
| 03/27/2007 | JOSE ORTIZ | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Denied | Please contact the Real Estate Division, Jim Rossi at # 791-4181 with regards to the permitted easements in the right of way. Although the PAD 10 calls for a 12' front and a 8' side easement to be permitted into the right of way, the City still needs to address these two easements with some documentation, ie: a Temporary Revocable or a permanent easement. |
| 03/27/2007 | JOSE ORTIZ | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Denied | March 27, 2007 ACTIVITY NUMBER: D07-0010 PROJECT NAME: Commercial Lot/Block "B" PROJECT ADDRESS: 100 S Avenida Del Convento PROJECT REVIEWER: Jose E. Ortiz PE, Traffic Engineer Resubmittal Required: Traffic Engineering does not recommend approval of the Development Plan; therefore a revised Development Plan is required for re-submittal. The following items must be revised or added to the development plan. 1. Include a response letter with the next submittal that states how all comments have been addressed. 2. List the ROW width, recordation data, and show dimension width of paving, curbs, curb cuts and sidewalks. (DS 2-05.2.2.D) 3. To assist with the review and for clarity indicate what is existing and what is proposed or proposed by others. Consider placing in the legend the CAD line work used for proposed and existing. 4. The PIA for Congress has been revised therefore if applicable illustrate any changes to this development plan due to changes to the PIA (i.e. parking along Congress may have been modified, if so illustrate on this development plan). 5. If applicable, the access points shall have 18' radius curb returns. (DS 3-01.0 figure 6) 6. A permit or a private improvement agreement will be necessary for any work performed within the Right-of-way. Contact Permits and Codes at (520) 791-5100 for permit information. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-4259 x76730 or Jose.Ortiz@tucsonaz.gov |
| 04/03/2007 | DBELL1 | LANDFILL | ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES | Approved | |
| 04/04/2007 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | 4350 E. Irvington Road, Tucson, AZ 85714 Post Office Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702 WR#179328 April 4, 2007 Gallagher Witmer, Architect LLC Attn: Gallagher Witmer 320 E Speedway Blvd Tucson, Arizona 85705 Dear Mr. Witmer : SUBJECT: Commercial Lot/Block “B” D07-0010 Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the development plan submitted March 23, 2007. It appears that there are no conflicts with the existing facilities within the boundaries of this proposed development. TEP will need a full set of approved site, electrical load, paving off-site improvements and irrigation plans. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. Any relocation costs will be billable to the customer. In order to apply for electric service, call the New Construction Department at (520) 918-8300. Submit a final set of plans including approved site, offsite and electrical load plans. Include a CD with the AutoCAD version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Your final plans should be sent to: Tucson Electric Power Company Attn: Ms. Mary Boice New Business Project Manager P. O. Box 711 (DB-101) Tucson, AZ 85702 520-917-8732 Please call the area Designer Mike Kaiser at (520) 918-8244, should you have any questions. Sincerely, Elizabeth Miranda Office Support Specialist Design/Build lm Enclosures cc: P. Gehlen and F. Rodriguez, City of Tucson (email) M. Kaiser, Tucson Electric Power |
| 04/11/2007 | FRODRIG2 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Passed | CASE: D07-0010 COMMERCIAL LOT/BLOCK "B": DEVEL PLAN COMMENT: This case does not have regionally significant transportation impacts. Please call if you have questions or need additional information. Tom Cooney, Travel Forecasting Manager Pima Association of Governments 177 N. Church Ave, #405 Tucson, AZ 85701 Tel: (520) 792-1093, Fax: (520) 620-6981 Web: www.PAGnet.org and www.RTAmobility.com |
| 04/17/2007 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 04/18/2007 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Approv-Cond | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: DO7-0010 COMMERCIAL LOT/BLOCK B/DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE: 4/18/07 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and we hereby approve this project. NOTE: Approved with the following condition: 1.) Correct Silver Bell Ave. to Silverbell Rd. on Location Map of mylar. Submit a 24 x 36 Reverse Reading Double Matte Photo Mylar of approved Development Plan to City Planning. Signed and dated Mylar will be forwarded to Pima County Addressing prior to assignment of addresses. All addresses will need to be displayed per Pima County Address Standards at the time of final inspection. es |
| 04/18/2007 | KAROL ARAGONEZ | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Karol Aragonez Planner PROJECT: D07-0010 Commercial Lot/Block "B" (Mercado District) Development Plan TRANSMITTAL DATE: April 17, 2007 DUE DATE: April 19, 2007 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is March 22, 2008. 2. Per the original request to the Department of Urban Planning and Design (DUPD) Commercial Lot /Block "A" would be utilized for overflow parking for this proposed project and temporary events. Please provide as part of this development plan proposed improvements to Commercial Lot /Block "A" since this was part of the proposal that the approval was based. 3. Please add note reading "The existing zoning is PAD-10". DS 2-05.2.2.B.1 4. Please remove the Chimney Height provided in the Site Calculations. This is not a requirement of the PAD to provide and is not subject to this review since chimneys are not being provided. 5. Case number D07-0010 has been assigned to this development plan (DP). Please place this number in the right corner of all sheets of the development plan, landscape plan, NPPO, and any other associated sheets. DS 2-05.2.2.B.2 6. Please revise the "Use section" under site calculations to provide the specific uses as permitted by the PAD under each use group and approved as part of original request made to DUPD. These uses were Alcoholic Beverage Services, Entertainment, Food Service, and Retail Sales. Listing just the use groups would imply that all uses within that group are allowed. PAD-10 page 9, Town Center 7. Please add note that reads "The project is subject is designed to meet the overlay zone criteria: Sec. 2.8.3, Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Setback Zone unless superceded by the criteria within the Menlo Park Mercado District Planned Area Development". DS 2-05.2.2.B.10 8. Please finish the FAR calculations by providing the percentage of proposed FAR. 9. Please draw all existing easements on the plan along with recordation information, location, width, and purpose. If an easement is no longer in use and scheduled to be vacated or has been abandoned, so indicate. If none exist provide response to reviewer's comments. Also if easements are purposed please draw, dimension and label as to their purpose and whether they will be public or private. If none exist provide response to reviewer's comments. DS 2-05.2.3.B & DS 2-05.2.4.G 10. Please provide the type and dimensioned widths of all existing paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks within Congress Street, Avenida Del Convento, and Paseo De Los Zanjeros as provided for in the PAD cross sections Congress Street "1", Residential 58'-35' "4", and Avenida Del Convento "5". DS 2-05.2.3.C & DS 2-05.2.4.D 11. Please dimension the width of Common Area "A". The subdivision plat indicates a width of eighteen (18) feet from edge of loading space to west and twenty-one (21) feet from Commercial Lot/Block "A" to south 12. Please label the existing zoning designation north of Congress Street (C-3). DS 2-05.2.4.B 13. Please dimension from the southwest corner of the dumpster to the west property line. Per the PAD the trash enclosure must be setback a minimum of three (3) feet from the lot line. This three (3) foot setback area shall also be an improved planter and maintained by the BOA. The current location of the refuse container is in back of the off-street loading space. Should a delivery vehicle and solid waste vehicle converge at the same time each will be impacted. DS 2-05.2.4.I & PAD-10 pg 40 14. Please dimension the MS&R setback (21 feet from north side of proposed bike lane) for Congress Street. 15. Structural improvements may not be placed in the MS&R right-of-way. Please remove the eight (8) foot building encroachment as indicated by keynote 11 along Congress Street since the PAD does not specifically discuss usage of the MS&R in this way. LUC 2.8.3.5 16. Within all development, a continuous pedestrian circulation path (4 foot wide concrete sidewalk) is required. The path must connect all public areas of the development and the pedestrian circulation path located in any adjacent street. All sidewalks will provide a minimum vertical clearance of eighty-four (84) inches. The cross slope of the sidewalk can not exceed two (2) percent and be designed to and constructed to convey the ten (10) year flood flows under the sidewalk/access. Please provide the location of interior sidewalks or indicate if the courtyard is to be paved with concrete, brick pavers, or equivalent material. DS 2-08.3.1, DS 2-08.4.1.D, and DS 2-08.5.1 17. Please indicate that the overhang encroachment along Avenida Del Convento and Paseo De Los Zanjeros will have a vertical clearance of eight-four (84) inches or greater. DS 2-08.5.1.B 18. The off-street loading space was not shown on the original request to DUPD. Please demonstrate that a delivery vehicle will be able to maneuver in and out of the proposed loading space. The size of the maneuvering area shall be based on national standards for turning radii required of the vehicles for which the loading spaces is designed, and have over head clearance of fifteen (15) feet. LUC 3.4.4.2.C & D Access is permitted from a private alley or side street but the actual maneuvering ability into the space was not addressed within the PAD. Per LUC Sec. 3.4.4.2.B an alley may be used for maneuvering of a delivery vehicle into, and out of, a loading space, only if the alley does not abut a residential zone or in this case the neighborhood general. 19. Please provide a typical parking space detail for both standard and handicap (HC) accessible. The detail for the HC accessible space should include the required HC signage, including its location and verbiage per TDOT requirements. 20. Required bicycle parking is required to be on-site per the PAD. Spaces shown within the right-of-way cannot count toward required bicycle parking. The twelve (12) required spaces must be placed onsite. PAD-10 pg 11 Please provide a plan view detail of the proposed class 2 bicycle parking spaces. Single rack spaces placed in a row will allow a minimum of seventy -two (72) inch length per bicycle parking space and a minimum of thirty (30) inches between outer spaces of racks. A five (5) foot wide access aisle measured from the front or rear of the seventy-two (72) inch long parking space will be provided beside each row. Lighting will be provided such that all facilities are thoroughly illuminated and visible from adjacent sidewalks, parking lots, or buildings, during working hours. The surface of the facility can be surfaced the same as for motor vehicle parking or with a minimum of one (1) inch thickness of one-fourth (1/4) inch aggregate material. DS 2-09.5.1, DS2-09.5.2, DS 2-09.5.4, & DS 2-09.6.2 In addition, per DS 2-09.4.1 Class 2 bicycle parking facilities will be located no more than fifty (50) feet from the main building entrance(s) and will be along the front side of the building as well as along other sides of the building that has an entrance. Please revise location of racks to meet this criterion. 21. Please show all sight visibility triangles on the DP, specifically for the private alley accessing onto Paseo De Los Zanjeros. DS 2-05.2.4.R 22. The current location of the refuse container is in back of the off-street loading space. Should a delivery vehicle and solid waste vehicle converge at the same time each will be impacted. Please relocate either the trash receptacle or loading space. 23. Please indicate the location and type of postal service to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements. Per PAD postal service pick-up and delivery for commercial uses will be provided at a centralized location on-site and within the PAD development. The facility will be an enclosed/sheltered area, open and accessible 24 hours. DS 2-05.2.4.V & PAD-10 pg 40 24. Per the original request to the Department of Urban Planning and Design (DUPD) for Commercial Lot /Block "A" & "B", the request talks about and show on the concept plan landscaping which appears to include oasis area and a splash pad. Per LUC Sec. 3.7.2.2.C.3 the allowance for an oasis area is equal to, but not more than two and one-half (2.5) percent of the site with general locational standards provided for in DS 2-06.0. Please provide the appropriate calculations and location requirements as specified by these sections. LUC 3.7.2.2.C.3 & DS 2-06.0 25. Per the original request to the Department of Urban Planning and Design (DUPD) for Commercial Lot /Block "A" & "B", the request talks about and show on the concept plan landscaping. Landscaping used within the development must meet requirements as specified in the PAD and LUC Division 7: Landscaping and Screening Regulations. 26. Per the original request to the Department of Urban Planning and Design (DUPD) for Commercial Lot /Block "A" & "B", the request talks about and show on the concept plan landscaping which appears to include oasis area and a splash pad. Per LUC Sec. 3.7.4.4.A Ornamental water features, such as fountains or ponds, may be used if all the following conditions are met: a) The total water surface area does not exceed one (1) percent of the net site area of the development. b) The water feature is located within the oasis area. c) The sum of the square feet of water surface area and the square feet of turf area does not exceed the total allowed square feet for the oasis allowance. d) Water in moving water features is recycled through the feature. e) The water feature is designed to prevent water seepage or leaking. Please provide the necessary items to meet theses requirements. A separate landscape may be necessary to address these items as listed in comments 22-24. 27. All changes, modifications, and/or corrections must be made on all applicable plans including the development plan, landscape plan, and NPPO. Once changes, modifications, and/or corrections are made and reviewed further comments may result. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Karol Aragonez, (520) 791-5550, ext. 74960. KAA S:\zoning review\karol\planning\cdrc\developmentplan\D07-0010dp.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development plan and additional requested documents. |
| 04/19/2007 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | Please contact the Real Estate Division, Jim Rossi at # 791-4181 with regards to the permitted easements in the right of way. Although the PAD 10 calls for a 12' front and a 8' side easement to be permitted into the right of way, the City still needs to address these two easements with some documentation, ie: a Temporary Revocable or a permanent easement. |
| 04/19/2007 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | DATE: April 19, 2007 TO: Ferne Rodriguez, Development Services FROM: Glenn Hicks Parks and Recreation 791-4873 ext. 215 Glenn.Hicks@tucsonaz.gov CC: Patricia Gehlen SUBJECT: D07-0010 Commercial Lot/Block "B": Development Plan Staff has no comments. |
| 04/19/2007 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Denied | Please contact the Real Estate Division, Jim Rossi at # 791-4181 with regards to the permitted easements in the right of way. Although the PAD 10 calls for a 12' front and a 8' side easement to be permitted into the right of way, the City still needs to address these two easements with some documentation, ie: a Temporary Revocable or a permanent easement. |
| 04/19/2007 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Denied | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN COMMENTS Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT D07-0010 Commercial Lot/Block "B" 4/19/07 () Tentative Plat ( X ) Development Plan () Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other CROSS REFERENCE: S04-053, C9-04-07 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: PAD-10 Mercado District of Menlo Park GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: COMMENTS DUE BY: April 19, 2007 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment ( ) Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies with Plan Policies ( X ) See Additional Comments Attached () No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: ( X ) Resubmittal Required: () Tentative Plat (X) Development Plan (X) Landscape Plan () Other REVIEWER: JBeall 791-4505 DATE: 4/18/07 Comments The Development Plan notes that no vehicular parking is required for commercial use. Although the PAD document states that commercial parking is not required for the Town Center, the applicant in their request for a minor amendment to the PAD to allow for an interim use of Commercial Lots / Blocks “A” & “B” indicated that a portion of Commercial Lot / Block “A” would provide for additional parking for both daily use of the proposed market and for the overflow parking during a temporary event. Please provide as part of this development plan proposed parking improvements to Commercial Lot / Block “A” . The applicant in their request for a minor amendment to the PAD to allow for an interim use of Commercial Lots / Blocks “A” & “B” indicated that the site would further be developed with landscaping and covered walkways and that this project would provide an interim enhancement and destination point for this area. Please provide a landscape. The Development Plan notes that encroachment into City right-of-way is allowed. However, the PAD cross section for Congress Street indicates a five-foot sidewalk and five-foot width for tree planters. The Development Plan shows planters in an eight-foot area. Please clarify by showing a cross section of Congress Street and the proposed improvements, including delineation of property line and City right-of-way. The Development Plan indicates a loading zone of 20’ x 91’ just south of the proposed trash enclosure. Although the PAD allows for this use and design, it appears that there might be a vehicular circulation conflict if trash pickup occurs the same time as the loading zone is being use. Please provide more information that shows the circulation pattern for trash pickup and the loading zone area, i.e. detail. |
| 04/20/2007 | ANDY VERA | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Denied | * Plan does not demonstrate adequate access and maneuverability for refuse service vehicle. DS 6-01.3 * The proposed refuse collection for this site will not work. Refer to DS 6-01.4.1. Re-submit DP and demonstrate on site refuse storage and collection within development. Provide the required 14ft x 40ft clear approach to enclosure area and demonstrate that the refuse service vehicle can safely maneuver within the development. * Provide enclosure construction detail. DS 6-01.4.2 |
| 04/20/2007 | PGEHLEN1 | TUCSON WATER NEW AREA DEVELOPMENT | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 04/20/2007 | ED ABRIGO | PIMA COUNTY | ASSESSOR | Passed | |
| 04/24/2007 | TIM ROWE | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | April 24, 2007 TO: Gallagher Witmer Gallagher Witmer, Architect LLC THRU: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department FROM: Chandubhai C. Patel, P.E., Civil Eng. Manager Development Review Division (Wastewater) Pima County Development Services Department SUBJECT: Commercial Lot/ Block “B”, Mercado District of Menlo Park Development Plan – 1st Submittal D07-010 The proposed sewer collection lines to serve the above-referenced development have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ), and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. ALL SHEETS. Add the project number, D07-010 to the title block of each sheet. This number should be shown larger or bolder than any cross-reference numbers. Provide a letter from PCWMD Development Services Section, written within the past 90 days, stating that the treatment and conveyance system capacity for this project is available. A capacity request form may be found at http://www.pima.gov/wwm/forms/docs/CapResponseRequest.pdf SHEET C-1. Add a Permitting Note that states: A PROJECT CONSTRUCTION PERMIT MUST BE SECURED FROM THE PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT BEFORE BEGINNING ANY WORK ON THIS PROJECT. 4. SHEET C-1 Show a Legend for property boundary , and use the same line type to show the property boundary on sheet C-2. 5. SHEET C-1 Show a legend for Proposed Private sewer, and use the same line type to show the proposed private sewer on sheet C-2. 6. SHEET C-1. The line type shown for the EXISTING PRIVATE SEWER in the Legend is different from that used on sheet C-2 for existing private sewer. Both the line types should be the same. 7 SHEET C-2. Use different symbols for the existing and proposed manholes. 8 SHEET C-2. Show the existing public sewer in the Congress Street using the same line type as per the LEGEND. 9. SHEET C-1. Show the information pertaining to the points of connection of the new BCS’s to the existing sewer line, showing the necessary information about the existing manholes ( IMS numbers, rim and invert elevations, etc.) located immediately upstream and downstream of the planned connection points of the new BCS’s. 10. SHEET C-2. Distinguish between the existing and new HCS’s using different line types, or labeling them appropriately. The line types shown for the existing and new sewer lines in the layout should be the same as that used in the LEGEND 11. SHEET C-2. It appears that you are not providing sewer service to all the buildings. Show how you will provide sewer service to every building 12. SHEET C-2. The Key Note no. 7 needs corrections. 13. We will require a revised set of drawings and a response letter addressing each comment. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. The next submittal of this project will be the 2nd submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $100.00 made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER must accompany the revised set of bluelines and the response letter. If you have any questions regarding the above comments, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Chandubhai C. Patel, P.E. Telephone: (520) 740-6563 Copy: Project file |
| 04/25/2007 | FRODRIG2 | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Denied | Please contact the Real Estate Division, Jim Rossi at # 791-4181 with regards to the permitted easements in the right of way. Although the PAD 10 calls for a 12' front and a 8' side easement to be permitted into the right of way, the City still needs to address these two easements with some documentation, ie: a Temporary Revocable or a permanent easement. |
| 04/25/2007 | FRODRIG2 | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Denied | Please contact the Real Estate Division, Jim Rossi at # 791-4181 with regards to the permitted easements in the right of way. Although the PAD 10 calls for a 12' front and a 8' side easement to be permitted into the right of way, the City still needs to address these two easements with some documentation, ie: a Temporary Revocable or a permanent easement. |
| 05/02/2007 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Denied | ADOT has no comments on this portion of the proposed project. However, ADOT would like a copy of any traffic reports on this project for our files. If none are available the minimum of a Traffic statement will be needed. Thank you. TM. |
| 05/29/2007 | ELIZABETH EBERBACH | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | TO: Patricia Gehlen; CDRC Coordinator SUBJECT: Rio Nuevo Mercado Block B Re-submittal Engineering Review LOCATION: T14S R13E Section 14 REVIEWER: Elizabeth Eberbach ACTIVITY NUMBER: D07-0010 SUMMARY: The Development Plan was reviewed by Engineering. Engineering has reviewed the received items and does not recommend approval of the Development Plan at this time. DEVELOPMENT PLAN COMMENTS: 1) City of Tucson Development Standards (DS) Section No. 2-05.2.4.T: Two trash bins are indicated on the plan, although the pick-up area for the trash would need to be dragged to the pick-up area on the south side of the Mercado site which does not seem feasible as they are 300-gallon receptacle bins. For refuse collection areas, provide enclosed, accessible pick up area. Bollards within dumpster areas will need a minimum of 10-ft for the inside dimension, show dimension or notation. 2) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.G: Provide clarification in response letter and/or plan view for the following: a) Provide maneuverability on planview for design of the loading / commercial access showing width of access areas, and turning radius for the design vehicle. Clarify access from Paseo De Los Zanjeros. Provide detail for access ramp/entrance. Stripping will need to be shown on grading/site plan submittal. Explain whether the existing entrance ramp needs to be widened to the east to accommodate loading vehicles entering this area. b) Provide more information regarding outdoor cooking area, keynote 16. c) Clarify linetype for Block B boundary delineation. d) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.R: Revise SVT to show 20-ft leg for sight visibility triangles on plan view. Show SVT at Avenida del Convento and Congress. e) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.V: Indicate location and type of postal service to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements, such as pedestrian accessibility, utilities, and landscaping. f) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.L: Add symbol to legend or add notation regarding truncated domes for ADA ramps. g) Label surface treatment between proposed building structures. h) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.G: Assure planview show all current utility easements. Label any easements with dimensions and type of easement. i) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.H.4: Provide spot elevations and flow arrows showing surface drainage between building structures. j) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.H.2: Indicate proposed drainage solutions, such as origin, direction, and destination of flow and method of collecting and containing flow from the roof. Provide drainage report that indicates direction of roof drainage and location of where the stormwater will be directed to offsite. On revised Development Plan planview, show roof flow arrows, the locations of the roof downspouts, and locations and types of scuppers at sidewalks. 3) DS Sec.2-05.3.1.E: Submit copy of master drainage report or a statement from engineer stating that the project is designed to be in compliance with Mercado master drainage report. 4) DS Sec.2-05.2.3.C: Provide cross sections from onsite across adjacent streets, showing elevations in adjacent streets and proposed grades and FFE's on site. Label right-of-way width, dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks. Submit revised Development Plan, master drainage report, and response letter. In order to expedite second review call to set up a meeting to go over resubmittal. If you have any questions on the comments, please call me at 837-4934. Elizabeth Eberbach, PE Civil Engineer Engineering Division Development Services |
| 05/29/2007 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES May 29, 2007 Gallagher Witmer Gallagher Witmer, Architect LLC 320 E. Speedway Blvd. Tucson, Arizona 85705 Subject: D07-0010 Commercial Lot/Block B Development Plan Dear Gal: Your submittal of March 23, 2007 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 9 Copies Revised Development Plan (Traffic, Zoning, DUPD, ESD, Wastewater, Real Estate, ADOT, Engineering, DSD) 4 Copies Revised Landscape Plan (Zoning, DUPD, Engineering, DSD) 2 Copies Master Drainage Report (Engineering, DSD) 2 Copies Traffic Report/Traffic Statement (ADOT, DSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 791-5608 extension 1179. Sincerely, Patricia Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 882-4022 dp-resubmittal |