Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Permit Number - D07-0006
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 02/21/2007 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 03/01/2007 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | NO COMMENT D07-0006 LEADS, INC. TUTOR TIME DAYCARE -------------------------------------------------------- Confidentiality and Nondisclosure Notice: This email transmission and any attachments are intended for use by the person(s)/entity(ies) named above and may contain confidential/privileged information. Any unauthorized use, disclosure or distribution is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by email, and delete or destroy all copies plus attachments. |
| 03/06/2007 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | 4350 E. Irvington Road, Tucson, AZ 85714 Post Office Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702 WR#178080 March 6, 2007 LEADS, Inc. Attn: Hank Hulbert 2400 N Central Ave, Suite 203 Phoenix, Arizona 85004 Dear Mr. Hulbert : SUBJECT: Tutor Time Daycare D07-0006 Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the development plan submitted February 22, 2007. It appears that there are no conflicts with the existing facilities within the boundaries of this proposed development. TEP will need a full set of approved site, electrical load, paving off-site improvements and irrigation plans. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. Any relocation costs will be billable to the customer. In order to apply for electric service, call the New Construction Department at (520) 918-8300. Submit a final set of plans including approved site, offsite and electrical load plans. Include a CD with the AutoCAD version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Your final plans should be sent to: Tucson Electric Power Company Attn: Ms. Mary Boice New Business Project Manager P. O. Box 711 (DB-101) Tucson, AZ 85702 520-917-8732 Please call the area Designer Mike Kaiser at (520) 918-8244, should you have any questions. Sincerely, Elizabeth Miranda Office Support Specialist Design/Build lm Enclosures cc: P. Gehlen and F. Rodriguez, City of Tucson (email) M. Kaiser, Tucson Electric Power |
| 03/07/2007 | KAROL ARAGONEZ | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Karol Aragonez Planner PROJECT: D07-0006 Tutor Time Daycare Development Plan TRANSMITTAL DATE: March 7, 2007 DUE DATE: March 21, 2007 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is February 21, 2008. 2. All lettering and dimensions shall be the equivalent of twelve (0.12) point or greater. Please revise lettering that does not meet this requirement on sheets 2 of 4, 3 of 4, and 4 of 4. DS 2-05.2.1.C 3. Hatch pattern used to designate concrete interferes with dimensions and notes. Either remove pattern of change. 4. Please revise the project location map showing the subject site approximately centered within one square mile. Section corners are to be shown and labeled. DS 2-05.2.1.D.1 & 3 5. Within the title block please provide a brief legal description of the project site. DS 2-05.2.1.G.2 6. Please provide the contour interval with the north arrow and scale on sheets 2 of 4 and 3 of 4. DS 2-05.2.1.H 7. Please add the annexation case number (C15-88-1) and subdivision case number (S98-024) in the lower right corner, next to the title block on all sheets of the development plan, landscape plan, and NPPO. List as a note the conditions of annexation that are applicable to this site on the development plan and provide a separate letter detailing how compliance to those conditions were met. DS 2-05.2.1.K & DS 2-05.2.2.B.7 8. Case number D07-0006 has been assigned to this development plan (DP). Please place this number in the right corner of all sheets of the development plan, landscape plan, NPPO, and any other associated sheets. DS 2-05.2.2.B.2 9. Please add as a note the following "This project is designed to meet the overlay zones criteria: Sec. 2.8.3, Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Setback Zone and Sec. 2.8.4. Gateway Corridor Zone". DS 2-05.2.2.B.10 10. Please list the gross area of the site by square footage and acreage. DS 2-05.2.2.B.11 11. Please remove the Subdivision Coordinator approval block. This is not used on City projects. 12. Please draw all existing easements on the plan along with recordation information, location, width, and purpose. If an easement is no longer in use and scheduled to be vacated or has been abandoned, so indicate. If none exist provide response to reviewer's comments. Also if easements are purposed please draw, dimension and label as to their purpose and whether they will be public or private. If none exist provide response to reviewer's comments. DS 2-05.2.3.B & DS 2-05.2.4.G 13. Please provide the recordation information for both Hemisphere Loop Drive and Valencia Road. Provide the type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks for Valencia Road. Provide type and dimensioned curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks within Hemisphere Loop Drive. DS 2-05.2.3.C 14. It appears from assessors record that a split and reconfiguration of the original lots 17, 18, and 19 of Tucson International Gateway Center, Bk. 52, Pg. 56 was done and recorded in December of 2003. Please provide a copy of the COT Zoning approved land division and reconfiguration. If approval was not obtained this must be done prior to development plan approval. Please be aware that, if land division occurs and the number of lots falls within the definition of subdivision, a subdivision plat will be required. DS 2-05.2.4.A 15. Please provide wheel stop curbing for parking spaces to prevent vehicles from damaging adjacent landscaping and/or walls along the north and west boundaries. The wheel stop curbing is to be located two and one-half (2 1/2) feet from the front of the parking space. DS 3-05.2.3.C. 16. All accessible curb ramps including the flush entrances of buildings and access aisle to handicap parking spaces shall have truncated domes installed that shall be twenty-four (24) inches minimum in the direction of travel and extend the full width of the curb ramp or flush surface. The domes shall be located so the edge nearest the curb line is six (6) inches to eight (8) inches from the curb line. ANSI 406.12, ANSI 705 17. Signage for handicap parking will be posted no less than seven (7) feet from the bottom of the sign to top of curb per TDOT requirements. Please add note to Detail 4/4. 18. Please revise the parking calculation for handicap parking to state that a minimum of one (1) space of the required five will be van accessible. 2003 IBC Sec. 1106.5 19. At least one (1) sidewalk will be provided to the project site from each street on which the project has frontage. The sidewalk should be located to minimize any conflict with vehicular access to the project, shall be flood free for all discharges up to 10 year flood event, and be a minimum of four (4) feet wide with a slope that does not exceed 2%. The sidewalk will connect the internal pedestrian path to the path located in the adjacent street. Please provide. DS 2-08.4.1.A, D, and E & DS 2-08.5.1.A, D and E 20. Please provide the dimensions of the building on the building footprint. DS 2-05.2.4.N 21. Calculation for required number of off-street loading spaces is based on the Gross Floor Area (GFA) of the use, including any outdoor area dedicated to the use. A commercial building with a GFA between 25,000 and 30,000 square feet requires a minimum of two (2) off-street loading spaces measuring twelve (12) feet by thirty-five (35) feet. This does not include the outdoor area dedicated to the use. Please provide the required number of off-street loading spaces for this project based on the total GFA of building and outdoor area dedicated to the use, utilizing Table 3, LUC Sec. 3.4.5.3. The loading space shall be designed so that a delivery vehicle can be maneuvered in and out of the loading space. The size of the maneuvering area shall be based on national standards for turning radii required for vehicles for which the space is designed. Show all loading spaces, fully dimensioned, and provide the number of loading spaces required and the number provided. LUC 3.4.3.3, LUC 3.4.4.2.C, LUC 3.4.5.3, & DS 2-05.2.4.O 22. Please provide a plan view detail of the proposed class 2 bicycle parking spaces. Single rack spaces placed in a row will allow a minimum of seventy -two (72) inch length per bicycle parking space and a minimum of thirty (30) inches between outer spaces of racks. A five (5) foot wide access aisle measured from the front or rear of the seventy-two (72) inch long parking space will be provided beside each row. Lighting will be provided such that all facilities are thoroughly illuminated and visible from adjacent sidewalks, parking lots, or buildings, during working hours. The surface of the facility can be surfaced the same as for motor vehicle parking or with a minimum of one (1) inch thickness of one-fourth (1/4) inch aggregate material. DS 2-09.5.1, DS2-09.5.2, DS 2-09.5.4, & DS 2-09.6.2 The type of rack proposed does not provide two-point support for bicycles. Please review DS 2-09.8.0 Figure 2 - 7 for acceptable and unacceptable rack designs, Figure 8 for rack location, and Figure 9 for dimensional requirements. 23. Please indicate the location and type of postal service to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements. If mail is to be delivered to an area within a building please state so on the plan. DS 2-05.2.4.V 24. Indicate the locations and types of proposed signs (wall, freestanding, pedestal) to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements and that minimal locational requirements can be met. Also indicate if there are existing billboards on site. Billboards will be required to meet all LUC requirements as stated in LUC Sec. 3.5.4.26. If none exists please state so. DS 2-05.2.4.W & LUC 3.5.4.26 25. All changes, modifications, and/or corrections must be made on all applicable plans including the development plan, landscape plan, and NPPO. Once changes, modifications, and/or corrections are made and reviewed further comments may result. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Karol Aragonez, (520) 791-5550, ext. 1197. KAA S:\zoning review\karol\planning\cdrc\developmentplan\D07-0006dp.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development plan and additional requested documents. |
| 03/07/2007 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 03/13/2007 | ANDY VERA | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Denied | * Approach to north enclosure will work. South enclosure does not provide the required 14'x40' clear approach per DS. The concrete header and parking spaces encroach into this area. * Turning radius for ingress/egress and within PAAL from west to south direction is not sufficient to allow trucks to manuever safely. Require a minimum 36' inside rear wheel and 50' outside front bumper. 52' radius as noted on plan does not work. Measures at 38'. * Enclosure detail must identify dimensions. Demontrate required 10 ft. inside clear, between side wall protectors and between rear wall protector and front gates. |
| 03/19/2007 | FRODRIG2 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Approved | Transportation Information Rezoning, Plat, and Development Plan Reviews Provided by: Pima Association of Governments Data Services Department Kristen Zimmerman kzimmerman@pagnet.org www.pagnet.org This information is provided to assess the impact of the proposed development on surrounding traffic and roads. ___X____________ City of Tucson, Development Services Department, Community Design Review Committee ___________________ City of Tucson, Development Services Department, Rezoning ___________________ Town of Marana Planning Department ___D07-0006________ Tutor Time Day Care ______3-16-2007________Date ___________________ The transportation impact of this plan cannot be determined at this time; more detailed information regarding the nature of the development is required. ___________________ This project has no associated transportation impacts. ___1,982_________ Average number of 2-way daily trips (ADT) forecasted as a result of the proposed development __64,140___________ 2-way capacity on nearest existing major street ___41,714__________ Most recent (less than 3 years old) 2-way PAG traffic count on nearest existing major street If the forecasted ADT is greater than 500 ADT, additional traffic and road considerations are noted below. STREET IDENTIFICATION Nearest existing major street _Valencia (Country Club - Palo Verde)__ Is a road improvement planned as part of PAG's 5-Year Transportation Improvement Program? _______ Yes __X___ No (See http://www.pagnet.org/tip/ for more information on the PAG TIP program.) VOLUME, CAPACITY, TRAFFIC GENERATION CONSIDERATIONS On Nearest Existing Major Street (See http://www.pagnet.org/TPD/DataTrends/ for more information on local traffic volumes.) ___41,719___________ 2005 Daily 2-way Traffic Volume (ADT) Estimated by PAG Traffic Model __81,175_________ 2030 Daily 2-way Traffic Volume (ADT) Predicted by PAG Traffic Model __64,140___________ 2005 2-way Road Capacity (ADT) __64,140___________ 2030 2-way Road Capacity (ADT) ____6___________ 2005 Number of Lanes ____6___________ 2030 Number of Lanes TRANSIT AND BIKEWAYS CONSIDERATIONS Existing bus service _Rte 11, 30 min, 0 mi_____ (Route, frequency, distance from proposed development) Existing bikeway __Bike route with striped shoulder_____ d07-0006.xls 3/16/2007 |
| 03/21/2007 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Any required storm water detention/retention basins shall be landscaped to enhance the natural configuration of the basin. Design criteria are set forth in Development Standard 10-01.0. Revise the landscape plan to show basins and note depths and percentage of side slope or slope ratio. 2) Revise the sheet L-1 of the landscape plan to define abbreviations that occur in the bufferyard descriptions. 3) Show all proposed screen walls or fences on the development and landscape plans. DS 2-05.2.4.X., DS 2-07.2.2.A.3 4) An unpaved planting area, which is a minimum of thirty-four (34) square feet in area and four (4) feet in width, must be provided for each canopy tree planter in the vehicular use area. Revise the development and landscape plans to clarify. LUC 3.7.2.3 5) All lettering and dimensions shall be the equivalent of twelve (0.12") point or greater in size. Revise L-3 and NPP 2 to comply. DS 2-05.2.1.A 6) Revise the landscape plan to show the extent of supplementary irrigation in each planting area provided by water harvesting methods. Show the amount and disposition of flow and indicate drainage points from buildings and paved areas. DS 2-07.2.2.C 7) Grading, hydrology, and landscape structural plans are to be integrated to make maximum use of site storm water runoff for supplemental on-site irrigation purposes. The landscape plan shall indicate use of all runoff, from individual catch basins around single trees to basins accepting flow from an entire vehicular use area or roof area. Provide depression in the landscape areas where appropriate and identify water harvesting areas. LUC 3.7.4.3.B 8) The area between the right-of-way line and sidewalk and the area between the sidewalk and the curb, if not covered with vegetation, shall be covered with an appropriate inorganic ground cover, such as decomposed granite. Revise the plans to clarify compliance. LUC 3.7.2.4.A.4 9) Revise the native plant preservation plan aerial photo to show limits of grading/disturbance and identify PIP plants either by unique symbols or with an indication of the location of preservation fencing. DS 2-15.5 RESUBMITTAL OF ALL PLANS IS REQUIRED |
| 03/21/2007 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: D07-0006 TUTOR TIME DAYCARE/DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE: 3/20/07 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: Provide Legal Description on sheet 1. Include Portion of Lot 19, Tucson International Gateway Center, Book 52, Page 56. es |
| 03/21/2007 | FRODRIG2 | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Denied | There is a one foot no-access easement running along the south line of subject property that prohibits the proposed driveway on to Valencia Road. Along with the one foot no-access easement there is a 47' drainage easement that would be impacted by this proposed driveway. Real Estate defers to Traffic Engineering with regards to the proposed access driveway on Valencia. |
| 03/21/2007 | JOSE ORTIZ | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Denied | March 21, 2007 ACTIVITY NUMBER: D07-0006 PROJECT NAME: Tutor Time Daycare PROJECT ADDRESS: Valencia Rd/Hemisphere Loop PROJECT REVIEWER: Jose E. Ortiz PE, Traffic Engineer Resubmittal Required: Traffic Engineering does not recommend approval of the Development Plan; therefore a revised Development Plan is required for re-submittal. The following items must be revised or added to the development plan. 1. Include a response letter with the next submittal that states how all comments have been addressed. 2. The Valencia Road access is not permitted due to the 1' No Access Easement along the southern property line. Since the proposed development would have access off of Hemisphere Loop the Department of Transportation recommends that no access be permitted off of Valencia Road. This recommendation was established in an effort to follow the intent of the City's Access Management Guidelines, which limits the number conflict points such as driveways along the city's arterial roadways. 3. The access points shall have 18' radius curb returns along Hemisphere Loop. (DS 3-01.0 figure 6) 4. A permit or a private improvement agreement will be necessary for any work performed within the Right-of-way. Contact Permits and Codes at (520) 791-5100 for permit information. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-4259 x76730 or Jose.Ortiz@tucsonaz.gov |
| 03/21/2007 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Denied | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN COMMENTS Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT D07-0006 Tutor Time Daycare 03/20/07 () Tentative Plat ( X ) Development Plan () Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment ( ) Other CROSS REFERENCE: C15-88-01 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: General Plan GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: COMMENTS DUE BY: 03/21/07 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment () Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies with Plan Policies ( X ) See Additional Comments Attached () No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: ( X ) Resubmittal Required: ( ) Tentative Plat ( X ) Development Plan () Landscape Plan () Architectural Review Board Approval Letter REVIEWER: drcorral 791-4505 DATE: 03/20/07 Comments Per Ordinance #7090, please add a note to the General Notes section of the development plan to read as follows: Building Heights shall be limited to 39 feet. The following uses shall be prohibited: Carpenter Shop; Cigar Manufacturing (Custom Hand-Rolled); Sheetmetal or Tin Smithshop; Transfer or Express Services; Upholstery Shop, and Manufacturing over 25% of Floor Area. |
| 03/26/2007 | PGEHLEN1 | TUCSON WATER NEW AREA DEVELOPMENT | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 03/26/2007 | ED ABRIGO | PIMA COUNTY | ASSESSOR | Passed | |
| 03/30/2007 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Denied | DATE: March 29, 2007 TO: Ferne Rodriguez, Development Services FROM: Glenn Hicks Parks and Recreation 791-4873 ext. 215 Glenn.Hicks@tucsonaz.gov CC: Patricia Gehlen SUBJECT: D07-0006 Tutor Time Daycare: Development Plan Please indicate a non-motorized, public trail easement is being dedicated along the north side of the drainage channel along Valencia Rd. and for the length of the subject property. The easement should be 12 ft wide measured north from the top of the bank. |
| 04/03/2007 | TIM ROWE | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | April 3, 2007 To: Hank Hulbert LEADS, Inc. Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department ____________________________________ From: Thomas Porter(520-740-6579) Sr. CEA, representing the Pima County Departments of Wastewater Management and Environmental Quality Subject: Tutor Time Development plan- 1st Submittal D07-0006 The proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. This project will be tributary to the Roger Road Wastewater Treatment Facility via the Southeast Interceptor. Obtain a letter from the PCWMD's Development Services Section, written within the past 90 days, stating that treatment and conveyance system capacity for the project is available in the downstream public sewerage system and provide a copy of that letter to this office. The required form to request such a letter may be found at: http://www.pima.gov/wwm/forms/docs/CapResponseRequest.pdf. The development plan for this project cannot be approved until a copy of this letter has been received by this office. Sheet 1: Change the General Note No. 5 to read as follows: THE ON-SITE SANITARY SEWERS WILL BE PRIVATE AND WILL BE CONSTRUCTED, OPERATED AND MAINTAINED ON A PRIVATE BASIS, AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH AN APPROVED OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE PLAN, IF REQUIRED. THE LOCATION AND METHOD OF CONNECTION TO AN EXISTING PUBLIC SANITARY SEWER IS SUBJECT TO REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT. Sheet 1: Add a General Note that states: ANY WASTEWATER DISCHARGED INTO THE PUBLIC SANITARY SEWERAGE SYSTEM SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE INDUSTRIAL WASTE ORDINANCE (PIMA COUNTY ORDINANCE NO. 1991-140, AS AMENDED). Sheet 1: Add a General Note that states: THIS PROJECT WILL HAVE ______ EXISTING AND______ PROPOSED WASTEWATER FIXTURE UNIT EQUIVALENTS PER TABLE 13.20.045(E)(1) IN PIMA COUNTY CODE 13.20.045(E). And fill in the blanks with the appropriate values. Sheets 1, 2 & 3: Show the public and private sewer lines using different line-types, so that they can readily be distinguished from each other. Also, show and describe examples of these different line types in the legend on Sheet 1. All Sheets: Add the case number, D07-006, to the title block of each sheet. This number should be shown larger or bolder than any cross reference numbers. No wastewater review fees will be charged for sheets where this is the only required revision. Sheets 2 & 3: The existing off-site manholes need to be labeled with the IMS numbers. Also the public sewer plan numbers for the existing off-site sewer lines need to be shown on this plan. Sheets 2 & 3: Flow directional arrows need to be shown on all sewer lines. Sheet 3: It does not appear to be necessary to use 12” sewer line at such a low slope of 0.21%. The pipe size should be decreased to no more the 8” & the slope should be increased to at least 0.44%. Sheet 3: Under Private Sewer Line Notes please clarify the initials POC. This office will require a revised set of bluelines, and a response letter, addressing these comments. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. Pima County Code Title 13.20.030.A.2 requires that a wastewater review fee be paid for each submittal of the development plan. The fee for the first submittal is $166 plus $50 per sheet. For the second submittal, the review fee is $50 per sheet. For all subsequent submittals, the review fee is $39 per sheet. The next submittal of this project will be the 2nd submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $150.00 (made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER) must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. If you have any questions regarding the above mentioned comments, please contact me. |
| 04/18/2007 | JASON GREEN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: April 18, 2007 SUBJECT: Tutor Time Daycare Development Plan- Engineering Review TO: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager LOCATION: Parcel ID: 140-29-212B; T15S R14E Sec09, Ward 5 REVIEWERS: Jason Green, CFM ACTIVITY: D07-0006 SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Development Services Department has received and reviewed the proposed development plan, landscape plan, and Drainage Statement (prepared by LEADS, Inc., dated 1-25-2007). The drainage statement was reviewed for development plan purposes only. The development plan is not approved at this time. Please address the following comments: DRAINAGE REPORT: 1) DS Sec.10-02.2.3.1.2.D: Provide the Master Drainage Report for Tucson International Gateway Center (Book 52, Page 056) showing any conditions for Phase development. The Master Drainage Report should show a future drainage scheme that takes into account the detention/retention requirements for this property. If the detention/retention requirements have not been satisfied a revised drainage report with calculations and detention/retention basin design for critical basin requirements are required for the proposed project. For critical basin design the on-site post developed discharge must be reduced by 15% of the existing discharge value and 5-year threshold retention must be contained onsite. 2) DS Sec.2-05.3.2.A & 10-01.2.2: Provide a geotechnical report with building setbacks from the existing channel, slope stability recommendations for channel design, slope stability, proposed spillway riprap recommendations and infiltration rates if basin design is required. Clarify if Master Drainage Report and approved geotechnical report address these comments. 3) DS Sec.10-2.2.3.1.5.B: Provide calculations with riprap designs for the proposed riprap erosion protection for the storm drains at the channel. The detail must show dimensions, riprap sizing, thickness, method of placement, filter fabric, and any geotechnical recommendations. DEVELOPMENT PLAN COMMENTS: 4) Delineate on the development plan the Xero-riparian habitat and the mapped Critical and Sensitive Biological Communities (Shaw 1986). No unnecessary development is allowed within these mapped riparian habitats unless approved by the Landscaping Division. Landscaping must approve the mitigation of any disturbance prior to development plan approval. 5) Tucson Code Chapter 26-11: Provide a Floodplain Use Permit with the next submittal for the encroachment into the Xero-riparian habitat and the mapped Critical and Sensitive Biological Communities (Shaw 1986). A FUP must be submitted with the development plan for approval. 6) DS Sec.2-05.2.1.C: Revise the development plan so that all lettering, site boundary information and survey information is the equivalent of twelve point or greater. The existing survey information is not legible. 7) DS Sec.2-05.2.1.D: Revise the project location map on Sheet C-1 to show the subject property approximately centered within one square mile area. Identify conditions within the square mile area, such as major watercourses (Rodeo and Earp Wash) and label section corners. 8) DS Sec.2-05.2.1.H: Reference the contour interval used for the existing and proposed topography. 9) DS Sec.2-05.2.1.K: Provide both the annexation case number (C15-88-1) and the rezoning case number (C09-82-106) in the lower right hand corner next to the title block on all sheets. 10) DS Sec.2-05.2.1.K: The correct development plan number (D07-0006) may be added to the lower right hand corner of the plan on all sheets. 11) DS Sec.2-05.2.2.B.10: Provide a General Note on the development plan stating that the project is designed to meet the criteria for 1) Major Streets and Routes setback Zone (MS&R) for Valencia Road and 2) Gateway Corridor Zone for Valencia Road. 12) DS Sec.2-05.2.2.D.1: Provide the following note on the development plan due to the deceleration lane required for Valencia Road; "All new public roads within and adjacent to this project will be constructed in accordance with the approved plans. Construction plans will be submitted to the City Engineer's Office for review and approval." 13) DS Sec.2-05.2.3.B: Verify that all easements are shown on the development plan. Specifically clarify the over head electric line and any associated easements. Provide the Limits of the 100-year floodplain boundary as shown in Book 52, Page 56. 14) DS Sec.2-05.2.3.C: Provide the recordation information for Valencia Road and Hemisphere Loop. Photo documentation is required for the existing 4-foot sidewalk and curb along Hemisphere Loop showing that the sidewalk is in good condition. If the sidewalk is missing in spots or is cracked and buckled a new 5-foot sidewalk will be required. 15) DS Sec.2-05.2.3.E: Provide the City of Tucson field book number and page with datum reference for the existing and proposed spot elevations and topography used on the development plan. 16) DS Sec.2-05.2.3.E.1: Revise the development plan to clarify the spot elevations on Sheet C-3. Provide all elevations in 12 point. 17) DS Sec.2-05.2.3.I.1: Provide the Master Drainage Report for the subject parcel to verify that the detention/retention requirements have been addressed. If critical basin detention and 5-year threshold retention requirements were not addressed in the Master Drainage Report for the subject parcel provide a drainage report with detention/retention calculations and basin design. The proposed development plan must match the requirements within the drainage report and geotechnical report. Label the 100-year floodplain limits for the existing drainage channel per the Subdivision plat, Book 52, Page 56. 18) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.E: Revise the development plan to label the existing and future right of way widths for both Valencia Road and Hemisphere Loop. 19) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.H.1: Provide the ponding limits at all catch basin locations to verify ponding depths within the vehicular use area. Provide the ponding limits within the "play area" that is used for stormwater harvesting to verify depths of flow. 20) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.H.2: Approval from TDOT Permits and Codes for the proposed culverts within the public right-of-way will be required. A right-of-way use permit application will be required prior to construction. Contact Steve Tineo at 741-3115 for all right-of-way requirements and permit applications. 21) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.H.3: Provide details for all storm drains and transitions of storm drains to the existing channel. Provide a detail for the channel inlet at the vehicular use area. 22) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.H.3: Provide a detail for the proposed culverts under the driveway entrance Valencia Road. Provide hydraulic calculation sheets with ponding limits to assure all weather access. 23) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.K: Provide a continuous pedestrian circulation path that connects all public access areas of the proposed building and the sidewalk areas located on Valencia Road and Hemisphere Loop. Per DS Sec.2-08 sidewalks are to be flood free for all storm discharges of up to a ten (10) year flood, provide a revised drainage report showing calculations, sizing and a detail for all sidewalk scuppers. 24) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.L: Revise the development plan and details to show existing or proposed sidewalks along abutting right-of-way. Revise dimensions on development plan to show the existing or proposed 6-foot wide sidewalk along Valencia Road. Per the adopted Mayor and Counsel policy all sidewalks along MS&R right-of-ways for arterial and collector streets require 6-foot wide sidewalks. All sidewalks must comply with ADA accessibility requirements. 25) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.T: Revise the detail dimensions for refuse containers, the enclosure must have a minimum inside clear dimension of 10 feet by 10 feet between the steel bollards that are required between the container and the enclosure's rear and sidewall. Refer to DS Sec.6-01.4.2 for specifications and requirements on access, placement of containers, bin enclosure and construction. 26) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.T: Show maneuverability for the refuse vehicles in plan view. Label and show the turning radius. 27) DS Sec.11-01.4.1.C.3: Provide the percent slope in the bottom of the existing channel to assure positive drainage to the proposed culverts under the access point. GRADING PLAN: 28) DS Sec.11-01.2.1: A grading permit may be required for this project after the revised development plan submittal review. A grading permit may not be issued prior to development plan approval. Subsequent comments may be necessary, depending upon the nature and extent of revisions that occur to the plans. 29) Please ensure the grading plan is consistent with the development plan and drainage report. Grading standards may be accessed at: http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/DevStandsTOC.pdf 30) Provide a General Note to reference conformance with City of Tucson Development Standard 11-01.0 (excavation and grading requirements). 31) Arizona Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (AZPDES) requirements are applicable to this project. Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans (SWPPP) and text addressing stormwater controls for all areas affected by construction activities related to this development will be required with a grading plan submittal. For further information, visit www.adeq.state.az.us/environ/water/permits/stormwater.html. GEOTECHNICAL REPORT: 32) DS Sec.10-02.14.2.6: A geotechnical evaluation needs to be submitted for review, addressing the following: a) Soils report should provide conformance with DS section 10-02.14.2.6 regarding 30-foot boring for basin, and provide discussion of potential for hydro-collapsible soils and any recommendation for setbacks from building to existing channel. b) The soils report shall provide identification / assessment of any potentially hazardous geotechnical areas, and state any geotechnical recommendations and whether there are special provisions for the soil preparation for this development. c) Provide slope stability recommendations for any proposed constructed slopes. d) Provide pavement structure design recommendations. e) Provide infiltration rates for detention/retention design if the Master Drainage Report does not address. GENERAL COMMENTS: Please provide a revised development plan, a revised drainage report, a geotechnical report and approval from DSD Landscaping Division that addresses the comments provided above. Include a comprehensive response letter addressing in detail responses to all of the above comments. Further comments may be generated upon resubmittal of the revised development plan, drainage report, geotechnical report and DSD Landscaping Division reviews. For any questions or to schedule a meeting, call me at 520-837-4929 (please note the new phone number for your records). Jason Green, CFM Senior Engineer Associate Engineering Division Development Services |
| 04/19/2007 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES April 19, 2007 Hank Hulbert Leads, Inc. 2400 North Central Avenue, Suite 203 Phoenix, Arizona 85004 Subject: D07-0006 Tutor Time DayCare Development Plan Dear Hank: Your submittal of February 22, 2007 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 11 Copies Revised Development Plan (Zoning, ESD, DUPD, Addressing, Traffic, Real Estate, Landscape, Parks and Recreation, Wastewater, Engineering, DSD) 6 Copies Revised Landscape Plan (Zoning, DUPD, Landscape, Parks and Recreation, Engineering, DSD) 2 Copies Revised NPPO Plan (Landscape, DSD) 2 Copies Revised Drainage Report (Engineering, DSD) 2 Copies City of Tucson Approved Lot Split Documents (Zoning, DSD) 2 Copies Geotechnical Report (Engineering, DSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 791-5608 extension 1179. Sincerely, Patricia Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: (602) 254-1700 |