Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - DEV PLAN
Permit Number - D07-0004
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - DEV PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 04/19/2007 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 04/23/2007 | PAUL MACHADO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 05/02/2007 | FRODRIG2 | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Approved | May 1, 2007 To: Steven Gregor, Gregor Engineering Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Project Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department ____________________________________ From: Tom Porter (520-740-6579), representing the Pima County Departments of Wastewater Management and Environmental Quality Subject: Accurate Automotive Facility, 8283 E. Bowline Road Development Plan - 1st Submittal D07-004 The proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. The Pima County Department of Environmental Quality and Wastewater Management Department hereby approve the above referenced submittal of the development plan as submitted. Please note the following: Approval of the above referenced submittal does not authorize the construction of public or private sewer collection lines, or water distribution lines. Prior to the construction of such features, a Construction Authorization (Approval To Construct) may need to be obtained from the Pima County Environmental Quality. Also, air quality activity permits must be secured by the developer or prime contractor from the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality before constructing, operating or engaging in an activity which may cause or contribute to air pollution. If you have any questions regarding the above mentioned comments, please contact me at the telephone number shown under my signature on the first page of this letter CC: Project File |
| 05/15/2007 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 05/30/2007 | HEATHER THRALL | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Heather Thrall Senior Planner PROJECT: D07-0004 8283 E. Bowline Road, Accurate Automotive Repair Facility Development Plan, Revision - revision is greater than 25% GFA expansion 1st review, full code compliance TRANSMITTAL DATE: May 30, 2007 DUE DATE: May 17, 2007 COMMENTS: 1. Per DS 2-05.2.3.B, ensure all easements are on the plan with type and recordation. RESPONSE: I see the private drainage easement noted as number 6 -on the plan. It's noted as going to be abandoned - provide the recordation and a copy of the abandonment. 2. Per DS 2-05.2.4.A, please give a history of all splits/reconfigurations with city approval. Also, the final plat for this subdivision indicates that the lot area is only 20,460 square feet - yet the plan shows a possible 8,000 square feet gain of land area - please help identify if any changes or reconfigurations were done. RESPONSE: no documents supporting a lot split history were found. Please clarify? 3. Per DS 2-05.2.4.D.3, with regards to vehicular use area: A) dimension distance between screen wall along Bowline and adjacent back up spur, 3' is required (RESPONSE - provided less than 3', revise and provide 3'. B) Clarify if note 30 on the plan is in the correct place - it appears that there is a PROPOSED sidewalk outside of the future curb and that is not the correct place for it - are you making a current sidewalk and then in the future will have a future sidewalk?- (RESPONSE -where is future sidewalk if this is current sidewalk being removed in future? 4. Per DS 2-05.2.4.I, with regards to building setbacks/building issues: A) call out all door entries - to new addition too RESPONSE: please show garage door entries and widths B) call out height of new expansion - is it also 20 like existing building? RESPONSE: I'm sorry, I didn't find this note… 5. Per DS 2-05.2.4.K, with regards to pedestrian circulation: A) Provide truncated domes (early warning devices) per ANSI 705.5 - at all ramps and where transitioning from vehicular use area to pedestrian area. Because the parking area slopes upward to meet the sidewalk, a 2' wide strip of truncated domes needs to be provided along the full length of the sidewalk that abuts the parking area (from fence to screen wall). (RESPONSE: Full code compliance requires ANSI be brought up to current code requirements, please add truncated domes to detail per above) B) Provide pedestrian route to trash enclosure (RESPONSE: this is required) C) Provide a ramp with truncated domes at walk way where sidewalk transitions to pedestrian refuge in front of garage bays (RESPONSE: Full code compliance requires ANSI be brought up to current code requirements, please add) 6. Please provide a note that the gates will remain open during business hours to allow access to all required parking. RESPONSE: I'm sorry, I didn't find this note. Please add note and keynote. 7. Per DS 2-05.2.4.U, please provide a separate response letter advising how this project meets all requirements of the rezoning case C9-85-95. RESPONSE: I'm sorry, I didn't find a separate response letter. 8. Please note that further review comments may be forthcoming, depending upon responses provided. Should you have any questions on this review, please contact me via email at Heather.Thrall@tucsonaz.gov or at 791-4541x1156. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call (520) 791-5608. C:\planning\cdrc\developmentplan\D07-004 accurate automotive.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development plan, and additional requested documents. |
| 06/29/2007 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES June 29, 2007 Brett Hurtienne EIT Gregor Engineering, Inc. 5232 East Pima Street, Suite A Tucson, Arizona 85712 Subject: D07-0004 Accurate Automotive Facility Development Plan Dear Steven: Your submittal of April 20, 2007 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 2 Copies Revised Development Plan (Zoning, DSD) Copies Revised Landscape Plan (Zoning, DSD) 2 Copies Lot History Documents (Zoning, DSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4919. Sincerely, Patricia Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 319-1181 dp-resubmittal |