Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - DEV PLAN
Permit Number - D07-0003
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - DEV PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 05/10/2007 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 05/16/2007 | FRODRIG2 | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | May 15, 2007 TO: John Szafran, AIA DPA Architects , Inc. THRU: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager City of Tucson, Development Services Department FROM: Tom Porter., Civil Eng.Asst. Development Review Division (Wastewater) Pima County Development Services Department SUBJECT: Horizon Irrigation and Turf Solutions Development Plan – 2nd Submittal D07-003 The proposed sewer collection lines to serve the above-referenced development have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ), and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. SHEET DP-1. Show the size, slope, material and length of the proposed BCS. 2nd request. SHEET DP-1. The existing sewer manhole in the legend should be marked as public and the BCS in the legend should be marked as private. There should be a symbol for the existing public sewer line also. The cleanout symbol should be shown in the legend. SHEET DP-1. The rim and invert elevations for the private cleanouts on site should be shown. Also the rim and invert elevations for the proposed public sewer manholes should be shown. Show the sewer plan # for the Rita Ranch Lots 35-37. SHEET DP-1. The easement for the public sewer should be shown where the line and manhole enter the property in the west corner. Show the width of easement and recordation information SHEET DP-1. Show the invert elevation of the new BCS at its point of connection with the public sewer. 2nd request SHEET DP-1. Show the information pertaining to the point of connection of the new BCS to the public sewer under construction in East Old Vail Road . Show the Pima County plan number for this sewer with its size and slope, and show the necessary information about the existing manholes located immediately upstream and downstream of the planned connection point of the new sewer line. 2nd request. This office will require a revised set of bluelines, and a response letter, addressing these comments. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. Pima County Code Title 13.20.030.A.2 requires that a wastewater review fee be paid for each submittal of the development plan. The fee for the first submittal is $166 plus $50 per sheet. For the second submittal, the review fee is $50 per sheet. For all subsequent submittals, the review fee is $39 per sheet. The next submittal of this project will be the 3rd submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $50.00 (made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER) must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. If you have any questions regarding the above comments, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Tom Porter Telephone: (520) 740-6579 Copy: Project file |
| 05/24/2007 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Approved | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: D07-0003 HORIZON TURF & IRRIGATION/REVISED DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE: May 24, 2007 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and we hereby approve this project. NOTE: Submit a 24 x 36 Reverse Reading Double Matte Photo Mylar of approved Development Plan to City Planning. Signed and dated Mylar will be forwarded to Pima County Addressing prior to assignment of addresses. 2.) All addresses will need to be displayed per Pima County Address Standards at the time of final inspection. jg |
| 05/25/2007 | ANDY VERA | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Approved | 1. Acces and approach to refuse enclosure area work. Maneuverability within development good. 2. Enclosure detail on sheet A1.3 works. |
| 06/04/2007 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 06/07/2007 | TERRY STEVENS | ZONING | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Terry Stevens Lead Planner PROJECT: D07-0003 Horizon Turf and Irrigation Development Plan TRANSMITTAL: 06/07/07 DUE DATE: 06/08/07 COMMENTS: 1. The Zoning Review Section approves the development plan for this project, subject to the following changes on the sign-off copies. However, should there be any changes requested by other CDRC members, the Zoning Review Section approval is void, and we request copies of the revised development plan to verify that those changes do not affect any zoning requirements. 2. Indicate on detail 2-A1.2 for the handicap parking space the maximum allowed slope of 1:48 for the parking space and the access aisle as per ANSI 117.1-2003 Sec. 502.5. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Terry Stevens, (520) 837-4961 TLS C:\planning\cdrc\developmentplan\D07-0003cadp.doc |
| 06/11/2007 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES June 11, 2007 John Szafran, AIA Contact: R. Allan Johns, R.A. DPA Architects, Inc. 7272 East Indian School Road, Suite 214 Tucson, Arizona 85251 Subject: D07-0003 Horizon Turf and Irrigation Development Plan Dear John: Your submittal of May 11, 2007 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 3 Copies Revised Development Plan (Wastewater, Engineering, DSD) 2 Copies Revised Landscape Plan (Engineering, DSD) 2 Copies Revised Drainage Report (Engineering, DSD) Engineering Review was sent 2nd party to Sunrise Engineering. Should you have any questions, please call me at 791-5608 extension 1179. Sincerely, Patricia Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: (480) 941-3888 dp-resubmittal |
| 06/11/2007 | SUNRISE ENGINEERING | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | June 6, 2007 City of Tucson 201 N. Stone Ave. Tucson, Arizona 85726 RE: Plan Review: Hidden Turf and Irrigation Supply Center- 9337 E Old Vail Rd. Applicant: DPA Architects, Inc Sunrise Engineering’s Civil Engineering Plan Review Team has completed the 2nd review of the following documents on behalf of the City of Tucson Development Services Department: Plans: One (1) copy (7 sheets) with cover sheet dated April 19, 2007. These documents were reviewed only for their conformance to the City of Tucson Development Standards (Revised January 6, 2000). Some of the previous comments were responded to and the responses are sufficient, however some issues remain. These comments are as follows: Development Plan: (previously comment 2) “There is a discrepancy between the x-sections and details of the basin with the plan view on the plans. Revise as required.” The sections show a bottom elevation of 2952.5 on some sections and 2953 on others, plus the plan seems to indicate a bottom of 2953. Please clarify and be consistent. (previously comment 4) “Show the standard H/C ramps used at a curb return per COT standards at the project entrance.” Call out these ramps on the plans and reference the detail and standard details. (previously comment 6) “Label existing and future sight visibility triangles per D.S. 2-02.2.1.10. The fut. SVT’s are not shown correctly. Revise as required.” The plan shows future and proposed, what is the difference? Why is the future SVT drawn from the gas line to the PUE line? (previously comment 7) “Fully-dimensioned loading space(s) and maneuvering area(s) per D.S. 2-02.2.1.15.” Show the width of the parking spaces- ‘typ.’ is acceptable. (previously comment 9) “Please provide Drainage patterns and finished grades per D.S. 2-02.2.1.16.” Add elevations for retention/detention area in the front. Add spot elevations and show the scupper (it is called out, but not shown). (previously comment 13) “Dimension from street monument lines to existing and proposed curbs, sidewalks, driveways, and utility lines per D.S. 2-02.1.21.” The utility lines (gas, sewer, water) need to be dimensioned from the centerline of Old Vail Road. (previously comment 15) “Please provide existing topographic contours at intervals not exceeding two (2) feet and/or spot elevations as pertinent and Bench Mark based on City of Tucson Datum, including City Field Book and page number per D.S. 2-02.2.1.23.” Include Benchmark and associated information on sheet 1. (previously comment 17) “Show Development plan number (D07-0003) on all sheets per D.S. 2-02.2.1.22.” Add the third 0 to the number. See redlined plans. (previously comment 18) “Show refuse container location, size, and access thereto fully dimensioned per D.S. 2-02.2.1.32 and D.S. 6-01.0. They must be able to reverse 50’ straight back in a clear area. Revise as required.” Show the turning radii on the civil sheets as well as architectural sheets. Note: SWPP Plan was not included and therefore not reviewed. Check some of the slopes. One slope indicated 1.00%, but the two grades are even (flat). Show high points in the grading plan. Use a grade break symbol or line. Drainage Report See comments within Drainage Report. On Proposed Conditions Map, indicate the limits of each contributing area and high points. What material is in the unpaved area in the back? Is it dirt? Gravel? Please specify. At this time we do not recommend approval. If you have any questions regarding these comments, please contact the reviewer Stephanie Schramm at 520-723-8634, between 8:00 A.M. and 5:00 P.M., Monday through Friday. Sincerely, SUNRISE ENGINEERING, Civil Engineering Plan Review Team Stephanie Schramm, P.E. Project Manager |