Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Permit Number - D07-0001
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/30/2007 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 01/31/2007 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 02/02/2007 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | DATE: February 01, 2007 TO: Ferne Rodriguez, Development Services FROM: Glenn Hicks Parks and Recreation 791-4873 ext. 215 Glenn.Hicks@tucsonaz.gov CC: Patricia Gehlen SUBJECT: D07-0001 Elliot Electronics Supply: Development Plan(1/30/07) Staff has no comments. |
| 02/05/2007 | JOSE ORTIZ | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Denied | February 5, 2007 ACTIVITY NUMBER: D07-0001 PROJECT NAME: Elliot Electronics Supply PROJECT ADDRESS: Tyndall Ave/23rd St PROJECT REVIEWER: Jose E. Ortiz PE, Traffic Engineer Resubmittal Required: Traffic Engineering does not recommend approval of the Development Plan; therefore a revised Development Plan is required for re-submittal. The following items must be revised or added to the development plan. 1. Include a response letter with the next submittal that states how all comments have been addressed. 2. Tucson City Code Chapter 25 Section 38 requires a minimum driveway separation of 12'. The location of the proposed driveway along Tyndall Ave may create future access constraints to the adjacent lot on the south due to the minimum frontage to Tyndall Ave from that southern lot. Please provide a cross access agreement so that the southern adjacent lot has future access, and to prevent future access constraints for the adjacent lot. If the adjacent lot is to be combined with this lot then provide documentation confirming the combo. 3. A permit or a private improvement agreement will be necessary for any work performed within the Right-of-way. Contact Permits and Codes at (520) 791-5100 for permit information. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-4259 x76730 or Jose.Ortiz@tucsonaz.gov |
| 02/08/2007 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | 4350 E. Irvington Road, Tucson, AZ 85714 Post Office Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702 WR#176951 February 7, 2007 Arquitecto E. J. Ornelas Attn: Eduardo Ornelas 100 N Stone, Suite 1002 Tucson, Arizona 85701 Dear Mr. Ornelas : SUBJECT: Elliot Electronics Supply D07-0001 Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the development plan submitted January 30, 2007. It appears that there are no conflicts with the existing facilities within the boundaries of this proposed development. TEP will need a full set of approved site, electrical load, paving off-site improvements and irrigation plans. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. Any relocation costs will be billable to the customer. In order to apply for electric service, call the New Construction Department at (520) 918-8300. Submit a final set of plans including approved site, offsite and electrical load plans. Include a CD with the AutoCAD version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Your final plans should be sent to: Tucson Electric Power Company Attn: Ms. Mary Boice New Business Project Manager P. O. Box 711 (DB-101) Tucson, AZ 85702 520-917-8732 Please call the area Designer Mike Kaiser at (520) 918-8244, should you have any questions. Sincerely, Elizabeth Miranda Office Support Specialist Design/Build lm Enclosures cc: P. Gehlen and F. Rodriguez, City of Tucson (email) M. Kaiser, Tucson Electric Power |
| 02/08/2007 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | NO COMMENT D07-0001 ARQUITECTO E. J. ORNELAS ELLIOT ELECTRONICS SUPPLY -------------------------------------------------------- Confidentiality and Nondisclosure Notice: This email transmission and any attachments are intended for use by the person(s)/entity(ies) named above and may contain confidential/privileged information. Any unauthorized use, disclosure or distribution is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by email, and delete or destroy all copies plus attachments. |
| 02/12/2007 | FRODRIG2 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Approved | Transportation Information Rezoning, Plat, and Development Plan Reviews Provided by: Pima Association of Governments Data Services Department Kristen Zimmerman kzimmerman@pagnet.org www.pagnet.org This information is provided to assess the impact of the proposed development on surrounding traffic and roads. X City of Tucson, Development Services Department, Community Design Review Committee City of Tucson, Development Services Department, Rezoning Town of Marana Planning Department Case Number Date The transportation impact of this plan cannot be determined at this time; more detailed information regarding the nature of the development is required. This project has no associated transportation impacts. 399 Average number of daily trips (ADT) forecasted as a result of the proposed development 42,560 2-way capacity on nearest existing major street 36,693 Most recent (less than 3 years old) 2-way PAG traffic count on nearest existing major street If the forecasted ADT is greater than 500 ADT, additional traffic and road considerations are noted below. STREET IDENTIFICATION Nearest existing major street Is a road improvement planned as part of PAG's 5-Year Transportation Improvement Program? Yes No (See http://www.pagnet.org/tip/ for more information on the PAG TIP program.) VOLUME, CAPACITY, TRAFFIC GENERATION CONSIDERATIONS (See http://www.pagnet.org/TPD/DataTrends/ for more information on local traffic volumes.) 2005 2030 2005 2030 2005 2030 TRANSIT AND BIKEWAYS CONSIDERATIONS Existing bus service (Route, frequency, distance from proposed development) Existing bikeway Number of Road Capacity Daily Traffic Volume (ADT) D07-0001 2/2/2007 Estimated by PAG Traffic Model (ADT) Lanes 42,560 d07-0001.xls 2/2/2007 |
| 02/15/2007 | AVERA1 | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Denied | * No known landfills within 1000 ft of development. * No provisions shown for on site refuse/recycling collection as required per development standards section 6-01.4.1A |
| 02/16/2007 | TIM ROWE | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | February 14, 2007 To: Eduardo Ornelas E.J. Ornelas & Associates Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department From: Chandubhai C. Patel, P.E., Civil Engineering Manager Pima County Development Services Department Development Review Division (Wastewater) Subject: Elliot Electronic Supply Development Plan – 1st Submittal D07-001 The drawings for the proposed Development Plan for the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. ALL SHEETS. Add the project number, D07-001 to the title block of each sheet. This number should be shown larger and bolder than any cross-reference numbers. Provide a letter from PCWMD Development Services Section, written within the past 90 days, stating that the treatment and conveyance system capacity for this project is available. A capacity request form may be found at http://www.pima.gov/wwm/forms/docs/CapResponseRequest.pdf 3. SHEET 1. The notes shown on the left top side of the drawing need to be grouped under GENERAL NOTES and PERMITTING NOTES. 4. SHEET 1. In the Legend, show symbols for existing public sewer with manhole. Label the cleanout and sewer line as proposed cleanout and proposed sewer line. 5. SHEET 1. Add a Permitting Note that reads: A PROJECT CONSTRUCTION PERMIT MUST BE SECURED FROM THE PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT BEFORE BEGINNING ANY WORK ON THIS PROJECT. 6. SHEET 1. Show the slope and length of the proposed BCS. 7. SHEET 1. Show the rim and invert elevations of the proposed COs. 8. SHEET 1. Add a General Note that reads: ON-SITE SANITARY SEWERS WILL BE PRIVATEAND WILL BE CONSTRUCTED, OPERATED AND MAINTAINED ON APRIVATE BASIS. 9. SHEET 1. Show the information pertaining to the point of connection of the new 6-inch sewer line to an existing sewer line. If the existing sewer is a public sewer, label it as such, and show the Pima County plan number for this sewer with its size and slope, and show the necessary information about the existing manholes ( IMS number& rim and invert elevations) located immediately upstream and downstream of the planned connection point of the new sewer line. 10. SHEET 1. Label the 6-inch sewer line as PROPOSED BCS. 11. SHEET 1. Use different line types for existing and proposed sewers. 12. We will require a revised set of drawings and a response letter addressing each comment. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. The next submittal of this project will be the 2nd submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $50.00 made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER must accompany the revised set of bluelines and the response letter. For any questions regarding the fee schedule, please go to http://www.pimaxpress.com/SubDivision/Documents/Fees.PDF where you may find the appropriate wastewater review fees at the bottom of page 1. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. If you have any questions regarding the above comments, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Chandubhai C. Patel, P.E. Telephone: (520) 740-6563 Copy: Project File |
| 02/16/2007 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: D07-0001 ELLIOT ELECTRONICS SUPPLY/DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE: 2/16/07 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: Correct 23th Street to 24th Street in Location Map. Correct Legal Description to include Lots 1 and 2 and delete from Location Map. Completely spell out suffixes for 23rd and Tyndall on sheets 1 and 2. Provide “blank” Address Block on Sheet 1 (minimum size to be 3” X 5”). es |
| 02/27/2007 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Add the CDRC case number and any related case numbers (rezoning) to the landscape and native plant preservation plans. DS 2-07.2.1.B 2) Submit a copy of the Preliminary Development Plan and revise the plans to include a correct copy (per ordinance) of the conditions of rezoning. The included communication from the City Manager to the Mayor and Council is only a recommendation and is inappropriate for inclusion in the plan set. C9-89-30 3) The vehicular use area must be provided with post barricades or wheel stop curbing designed to prevent vehicles from extending beyond the property lines; damaging adjacent landscaping, walls, or buildings and to prevent vehicles from accessing the alley. DS 3-05.2.3.C., C9-89-30 Revise the plans to provide a barrier to protect the proposed wall along the south property boundary, to protect the interior landscape border, to protect all other unpaved or landscape areas and to prevent alley access. 4) Revise the landscape plan to show the ultimate size of plants indicated by the spread of canopy, circumference of shrubs, or spread of ground cover. Revise the landscape plan symbols for canopy trees to reflect the mature size of the species used. DS 2-07.2.2.A.1.c 5) Revise the landscape plan to indicate the minimum width and square footage of tree planters in vehicular use areas. Planters are to be measured from the inside edge of tree planters. DS 2-07.2.2.A.2.e, LUC 3.7.2.3.A.1.c 6) Dimension the width of landscape borders on the landscape plan per DS 2-07.2.2.A.2.f. 7) Submit an irrigation plan. LUC 3.7.4.5.C 8) Submit a native plant preservation plan prepared by a plant professional per DS 2-15.0 or an application for exception. LUC 3.8.4.2 9) Landscape plans shall include a summary of Native Plant Preservation requirements identify existing plants to remain in place on the landscape plan. DS 2-07.2.2.A.1.e 10) A Native Plant Preservation is required for plants in the adjacent right of way. Show any existing plants to remain in the right of way. 11) Revise the development and landscape plans to provide a thirty-inch high screen along the Tyndall Avenue frontage. LUC Table 3.7.2-I 12) Revise all plans to show the location of on-site refuse storage and provide appropriate landscaping and screening per LUC Table 3.7.2-I. DS 6-01.4.1 13) Revise the landscape plan to show the extent of supplementary irrigation in each planting area provided by water harvesting methods. Show the amount and disposition of flow and indicate drainage points from buildings and paved areas. DS 2-07.2.2.C RESUBMITTAL OF ALL PLANS IS REQUIRED |
| 02/28/2007 | FRODRIG2 | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Approved | No comment |
| 03/02/2007 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Approved | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN COMMENTS Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT D07-0001 Elliot Electronics Supply 03/02/07 () Tentative Plat (XXXX) Development Plan (XXXX) Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other CROSS REFERENCE: C9-89-30 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Greater South Park GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: COMMENTS DUE BY: 02/28/07 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment (XXXX) Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies with Plan Policies () See Additional Comments Attached () No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: () Resubmittal Required: () Tentative Plat () Development Plan () Landscape Plan () Other REVIEWER: drcorral 791-4505 DATE: 02/27/07 |
| 03/05/2007 | PGEHLEN1 | TUCSON WATER NEW AREA DEVELOPMENT | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 03/05/2007 | ED ABRIGO | PIMA COUNTY | ASSESSOR | Passed | |
| 03/14/2007 | TERRY STEVENS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Terry Stevens Lead Planner PROJECT: D07-0001 Elliot Electronics Supply Development Plan TRANSMITTAL: 03/14/07 DUE DATE: 2-28-07 COMMENTS: 1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is 02/27/08. 2. DS 2-05.2.2.A.1 List the names, addresses, and telephone numbers of the primary property owner of the site and developer of the project. 3. DS 2-05.2.2.B.1 List as a general note: "Existing zoning is ____." Number the general notes in order for easier reading. 4. DS 2-05.2.2.B.2 Case number D07-0001 has been assigned to this development plan (DP). Please place this number in the right corner of all sheets of the development plan, landscape plan, NPPO, and any other associated sheets. 5. DS2-05.2.2.B.3 The proposed use of this project is "General Merchandise Sales "34" subject to: 3.5.9.2.A." Remove all references to "Wholesale Use", including in the parking calculations. FYI: There is no such use group as "Retail/Wholesale Use Group." 6. DS 2-05.2.3.B If applicable, all easements shall be drawn on the plan. The recordation information, location, width, and purpose of all easements on site will be stated. 7. DS 2-05.2.4.A A lot combination has been recorded creating one lot. A Covenant Regarding Development and Use of Real Property will be required to be completed and recorded. This form is available on line at the City of Tucson web site. Provide docket and page recording information on the site plan. 8. DS 2-05.2.4.D.3 Provide a barrier along the east property line to prevent vehicular access. 9. DS 2-05.2.4..I Revise the notes for the required and proposed setbacks to the requirements as per LUC Sec. 3.2.6.4. with a development designator of "DD". North-required 10', East ---required 0', South ---required 11/2 times the height of the structure, West----required 20' or 11/2 times the height of the structure. Provide the proposed setback in the notes and on the site plan. The indicated height of the structure is indicate on the site plan as 14'. In the notes the height is indicated as 15'. Clarify. Based on the structure height of 15' the required setback from the south property line is 22'-6". Revise plans and notes. Per rezoning case #C9-89-30 the maximum building height shall be twenty five (25) feet. Revise notes to indicate the correct maximum building height. Per rezoning case #C9-89-30 Storage shall be enclosed in the proposed building. Add a note to the site/development plan clearly indicating compliance with this rezoning condition. Provide a separate document clearly indicating how each of the rezoning conditions has been complied with. 10. DS 2-05.2.4.K Provide a pedestrian circulation path connecting to the sidewalk located along Tyndall Ave. Including sidewalk, crosswalk, handicap ramps, etc. See DS 2-08.3.1 Access ramps at crosswalks connecting to sidewalks must be provided. In addition Truncated Dome (early warning systems) must be added to all access ramps where transitioning from the pedestrian area to the vehicular use area or at HC access aisles transitioning to the sidewalk area. Provide a detail of the handicap ramp clearly indicating slopes and location of truncated domes. The truncated domes indicated in note #5 are to be located where the access aisle for the handicap parking space meets the landing and must be a minimum of 24" in width. 11. DS 2-05.2.4.N Provide dimensions on the footprint of the structure. 12. DS2-05.2.4.O Per LUC Sec. 3.4.5 for a Retail Trade Use Group (General Merchandise Sales) a loading zone per Sec. 3.4.5.3 is required. FYI: one 12 x 35 loading zone is all that is required. Revise note and plan if this smaller loading zone is to be used. 13. DS 2-05.2.4.P The parking calculations provided are for the incorrect use. General Merchandise Sales per LUC Sec.3.3.4 under the Retail Use Group requires parking spaces being provided at the rate of 1:200 sq. ft. of GFA. This project will require 45 parking spaces. A redesign of the project will be required or you may apply for parking space reduction through a Board of Adjustment Variance ( the variance may or may not be approved). Revise notes to correct the required and proposed parking space requirements. Provide on detail 1 of 3 the maximum slope of the handicap parking space and access aisle as per ANSI Standards. (maximum allowed 1:48) Provide a detail of the required handicap parking signage. FYI: The minimum distance from grade to the bottom of the handicap sign per City of Tucson standards is seven (7) feet. The handicap sign indicated on detail 1 of 3 cannot be located in the vehicle overhang area. Relocate. 14. DS 2-05.2.4.Q The required class 2 bicycle parking spaces cannot be located inside of the building. Two class 2 bicycle parking spaces are all that is required when less than 50 vehicle parking spaces are provided. Please provide a dimensioned detail class 2 bicycle parking spaces. Be aware that that development standard 2-09 has been revised. Once provided and reviewed further comments may result. The revised standards can be found at the DSD web site: http://www.tucsonaz.gov/dsd/Codes___Ordinances/DevStd209.pdf Please provide a plan view detail of the proposed class 2 bicycle parking spaces. Single rack spaces placed in a row will allow a minimum of seventy -two (72) inch length per bicycle parking space and a minimum of thirty (30) inches between outer spaces of racks. A five (5) foot wide access aisle measured from the front or rear of the seventy-two (72) inch long parking space will be provided beside each row. Lighting will be provided such that all facilities are thoroughly illuminated and visible from adjacent sidewalks, parking lots, or buildings, during working hours. The surface of the facility can be surfaced the same as for motor vehicle parking or with a minimum of one (1) inch thickness of one-fourth (1/4) inch aggregate material. DS 2-09.5.1, DS2-09.5.2, DS 2-09.5.4, & DS 2-09.6.2 Per DS 2-09.4.1 Class 2 bicycle parking facilities will be located no more than fifty (50) feet from the main building entrance(s) and will be along the front side of the building as well as along other sides of the building that has an entrance. Bicycle access through the development will be separate from the pedestrian ways. Vehicular access may be used as bicycle access. Bicycle access to a parking facility may cross a pedestrian way at a right angle (DS2-09.3.2). Multiple rack bicycle parking require a minimum thirty (30) inches between outer spaces of posts or racks (DS 2-09.5.1.A). Please review the revised DS 2-09 and provide the necessary corrections to the bicycle parking as required. Once changes are provided and reviewed further comments may result. The type of rack required must provide two-point support for bicycles. Please review DS 2-09.8.0 Figure 2 - 7 for acceptable and unacceptable rack designs, Figure 8 for rack location, and Figure 9 for dimensional requirements. Please review the revised DS 2-09 and provide the necessary corrections to the bicycle parking as required. Once changes are provided and reviewed further comments may result. 15. DS 2-05.2.4.V Please indicate the location and type of postal service to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements. If mail is to be delivered to an area within a building please state so on the plan. 16. DS 2-05.2.4.W Indicate the locations and types of proposed signs (wall, freestanding, pedestal) to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements and that minimal locational requirements can be met. Also indicate if there are existing billboards on site. Billboards will be required to meet all LUC requirements as stated in LUC Sec. 3.5.4.26. If none exists please state so. 17. Depending on changes to the plan and responses to the above comments further comments may be forth coming. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Terry Stevens, (520) 791-5550 ext. 2000. TLS C:\planning\cdrc\developmentplan\D07-0001dp.doc |
| 03/26/2007 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: March 26, 2007 To: Patricia Gehlen CDRC/Zoning Manager FROM: Loren Makus, EIT Engineering Division SUBJECT: Elliot Electronics Supply Development Plan D07-0001 (First Review) T14S, R14E, Section 19 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Revised Development Plan, Revised Drainage Statement The development plan has been reviewed by the Engineering Division and we do not recommend approval at this time. The following comments must be addressed: 1. Revise the drainage statement to allow offsite drainage to enter the site in the manner and location it has historically. 2. Revise the drainage statement and development plan to show the existing and proposed floodplain boundary. The floodplain is the area that is subject to inundation by a 1- percent chance storm where the discharge is at least 100 cubic feet per second. Add a note indicating that a floodplain use permit will be required for the development. (See Development Standard 2-05.2.2.C.2) 3. Show water surface contours at a minimum of two locatons. 4. DS 2-05.2.1 B. All mapped data on the development plan shall be drawn at an engineering scale having no more than forty (40) feet to the inch. This scale is the minimum accepted due to the detailed information required to show compliance. It also affords greater clarity after photographic reduction (microfilming) for record keeping purposes. 5. DS 2-05.2.1 H. List the contour interval near the north arrow. 6. Keynote 2 indicates that a driveway apron per standard detail 206 will be used. The plan view indicates curb returns. Revise the plans so the plan view matches the notes. 7. Show more existing and proposed spot elevations on the parcel. Show that drainage patterns will be achieved and positive drainage from the building will be provided. A grading permit will be required for this project. 8. Clearly indicate with section details, how the grades will be made from the street grade through the property. Show how the new street pavement and curbs will be accommodated. 9. Clearly show the water harvesting areas in the section details. Show sufficient grade information to show that the water harvesting areas will be level to collect water. Show how water will be directed to these areas. 10. Key note 4 doesn't appear to be used on the plan. Show the location on the plan where cans will be placed. Aerial photos inicate that there is vegetation within the alley. Show how alley access will be achieved. 11. Include the required drainage notes from the Development Standards. (DS 2-05.2.2.C) 12. Provide legend entries for all of the diagonal line drawing elements in the plan view. 13. Add the required streets notes from the Development Standard (DS 2-05.2.2.D) 14. Provide the correct bearings for the lot lines. The bearings shown appear to be shifted by about 90 degrees. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550 x1161 or loren.makus@tucsonaz.gov. Loren Makus, EIT Senior Engineering Associate |
| 03/27/2007 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES March 27, 2007 Eduardo J. Ornelas Arquitecto E. J. Ornelas 100 North Stone Avenue, #1002 Tucson, Arizona 85701 Subject: D07-0001 Elliot Electronics Supply Development Plan Dear Eduardo: Your submittal of January 30, 2007 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 8 Copies Revised Development Plan (Traffic, ESD, Wastewater, Addressing, Landscape, Zoning, Engineering, DSD) 4 Copies Revised Landscape Plan (Landscape, Zoning, Engineering, DSD) 2 Copies Revised NPPO Plan (Landscape, DSD) 2 Copies Revised Drainage Statement (Engineering, DSD) 2 Copies Recorded Lot Combo Covenant (Zoning, DSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 791-5608 extension 1179. Sincerely, Patricia Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 624-0747 dp-resubmittal |