Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - DEV PLAN
Permit Number - D06-0060
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - DEV PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 02/23/2007 | MARILYN KALTHOFF | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 02/28/2007 | JOSE ORTIZ | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | |
| 03/08/2007 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Denied | Provide new no-build easements or show revised property line setbacks and fire wall locations. If property lines are not moved or new easements made all walls less than 60 feet from a PL must be fire rated three hours. Walls less than 40 feet cannot have openings. |
| 03/09/2007 | FRODRIG2 | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | March 9, 2007 To: Wm. C. Schuiteman., AIA SBBL Architecture & Planning Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department From: Chandubhai C. Patel, P.E., Civil Engineering Manager Development Review Division (Wastewater) Pima County Development Services Department Subject: Midvale Commercial Center, Lot 2 Development Plan–2nd Submittal, D06-060 The drawings for the proposed Development Plan for the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. 1. SHEET DP1. Please make corrections as discussed in our meeting today. 2. SHEET DP 3. Please make corrections as discussed in our meeting today. Make sure the connection of the private sewer to the public sewer is shown including the invert elevation of the private sewer at the point of connection. 3. SHEET DP 4. The same comment as above applies to this drawing also. 4. We will require a revised set of drawings and a response letter addressing each comment. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. The next submittal of this project will be the 3rd submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $78.00 made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER must accompany the revised set of bluelines and the response letter. For any questions regarding the fee schedule, please go to http://www.pimaxpress.com/SubDivision/Documents/Fees.PDF where you may find the appropriate wastewater review fees at the bottom of page 1. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. If you have any questions regarding the above comments, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Chandubhai C. Patel, P.E. Telephone: (520) 740-6563 Copy: Project File |
| 03/21/2007 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Midvale Commercial Center D06-0060 Development plan (2nd Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: March 21, 2007 DUE DATE: March 23, 2007 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is January 01, 2008. 2. Zoning acknowledges that these easements will be either abandoned or redescribed. Provide the recordation information on the plan. D.S. 2-05.2.3.B There are electrical & water easements shown on the plan which run under structures, i.e. buildings, trash enclosures, These easements need to be relocated or abandoned. Provide documentation showing that these easements have been relocated or abandoned. 3. Zoning acknowledges the receipt of the Pima County Tax Parcel Combo and a recorded Covenant Regarding Development and Use of Real Property paper work. The Pima County Tax Parcel Combo does not appear to have been processed through the Pima County Assessor's office. It does not appear that the Covenant Regarding Development and Use of Real Property has been recorded with the Pima County Recorders office. Provide a completed Pima County Tax Parcel Combo and recorded Covenant Regarding Development and Use of Real Property. D.S. 2-05.2.4.A Provide a Pima County Tax Parcel Combo and a recorded Covenant Regarding Development and Use of Real Property for the property line that is proposed to be abandoned. On the plan remove the southern part of the property line, shown on the plan, that is proposed to be abandoned. 4. Zoning acknowledges what appears to be a crosswalk from near the northwest corner of building #7, show this as cross hatch for a crosswalk. This pedestrian access/access route, crosswalk running in front of the trash enclosure and loading zone D.S. 2-08.4.1.F, will require a Development Standard Modification Request (DSMR) which is supportable by zoning. D.S. 2-05.2.4.K The pedestrian access/access route shown at the northwest corner of building #7 provides an unsafe condition and also appears to encroach on the 24' PAAL, relocate. 5. Zoning acknowledges the striped area along the south side of building #10. The pedestrian access, crosswalk running in front of the loading zone D.S. 2-08.4.1.F, will require a DSMR which is supportable by zoning. D.S. 2-05.2.4.K Per D.S. 2-08.4.1.B provide a sidewalk along the south side of building #10. 6. Zoning acknowledges the addition of the crosswalk. This crosswalk needs to be aligned such that it does not form an inverted "Y". The crosswalks should converge at the curb access ramp. D.S. 2-05.2.4.K Provide a pedestrian access/access route from the proposed sidewalk shown at the southwest corner of building #6 across the entrance PAAL to the existing sidewalk to the south. 7. This comment has not been full addressed. See attached detail. D.S. 2-05.2.4.P Detail 2/DP5 Accessible Sign detail, the height of the sign from finished grade, pavement or sidewalk should be 7'-0". Also the lettering as called out on the sign is incorrect, see attached detail. 8. This comment has not been fully addressed. Provide a copy of the recorded cross access agreement. Provide recorded documentation that provides for the cross access across the property lines at the southwest corner of this site. The parcels in questions are 137-33-5730, where the existing billboard is located, and 137-34-0020. 9. Provide a pedestrian access/access route, sidewalk, curb access ramp and crosswalk from the proposed sidewalk southeast of the southeast corner of Building #11which should run across the existing PAAL to the existing curb access ramp located directly east. D.S. 2-08.3.1. 10. Per our last meeting on Monday March 19, 2007 it was brought to our attention that an "AUTOMOTIVE - MAJOR SERVICE AND REPAIR" would most likely will be using building #10. This said revise the plan to show the correct use. 11. Zoning acknowledges receipt of a copy of the "EASEMENTS WITH COVENANTS AND RESTRICTIONS AFFECTION LAND ("ECR"). Zoning also acknowledges that it is not the responsibility of The City of Tucson, Zoning Department to enforce this covenant. This said there are numerous items within these covenants which effect development on the site i.e. parking requirements, building size and height, etc. Zoning brings this to your attention only to alert all parties of possible issues in regards to this project. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 791-5608 ext. 1180. C:\planning\cdrc\developmentplan\D06-0060dp.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development plan, tentative plat, final plat, CC&R's and additional requested documents. |
| 03/23/2007 | ELIZABETH EBERBACH | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | TO: Patricia Gehlen; CDRC Manager SUBJECT: Midvale Commercial Center Lot 2 Revised Development Plan Engineering Resubmittal Review REVIEWER: Elizabeth Eberbach ACTIVITY NUMBER: D06-0060 SUMMARY: The revised Development Plan Revision package has been reviewed. Development Services Department Engineering does not recommend approval of the Development Plan at this time. The drainage statement was reviewed for development plan purposes only. DEVELOPMENT PLAN COMMENTS: 1) City of Tucson Development Standards (DS) Section No.2-05.2.4.O, 2-02.2.1.A.14, 2-05.2.4.T: Loading vehicle and solid waste vehicle maneuverability must be clarified for locations near buildings 7, 10 and 11. Provide access for truck loading and clarify maneuverability by delineating inside and outside radii for turning movement for solid waste and loading vehicle access. Revise planview on sheet DP3. 2) DS Sec.2-05.2.3.B: Specifically respond to the following easement comments: a) All easements shall be drawn on the plan b) Proposed or existing utility easements shall not conflict with proposed building footprints. As discussed in prior meeting for this project, should an easement be in conflict with any proposed building location, one of the following must be accomplished specifically for proposed north building 6: i) change layout for north building 6, or ii) indicate water easement relocation, or iii) provide documentation from Utility of no interest, or iv) provide copy of docket and page of abandonment. c) Label the recordation information, location, width, and purpose of all easements on site. d) Blanket easements should be listed in the notes, together with recordation data and their proposed status. e) Should an easement not be in use and be proposed for vacation or have been abandoned, so indicate. 3) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.T: Revise detail 5 on sheet DP5 to show minimum 10-ft between rear bollards and enclosure gate. 4) DS Sec.2-05.2.3.H&E.1: Label more existing / as-built contours on Development Plan planview, provide proposed FFE's, and proposed drainage flow arrows. 5) DS Sec.2-05.2.3.F&2.4.H.7: Describe and label existing storm drainage facilities at southwest corner of project. Resubmittal is required. Submit response letter and revised Development Plan. The next submittal should address all the above items. If you have questions, call me at 791-5550, extension 2204. Elizabeth Eberbach, PE Civil Engineer Engineering Division Development Services |
| 03/23/2007 | ANDY VERA | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Denied | * Does not provide adequate service access (per DS 6-01.4.0) to the following enclosure areas: 1. South of bldg #10 and behind bldg #7- 14'x40' clear approach in conflict with curbing and/or bldg. 2. North of bldg #6 - Collection vehicle unable to manuever within parking lot due to insuffient turning radius. * The containers are positioned so that it impedes the continuous flow of traffic within development. * Enclosure detail #5 double unit requires a minimum 10ft clear between the rear wall protector and the front gates per DS. |
| 03/23/2007 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | 1) Revise the tree planter on the east side of Building 11 to meet the size requirements of LUC 3.7.2.3.A.1.c 2) Submit any revised plans for review. Revise the landscape plans as necessary to reflect changes to the development plan. DS 2-07.2.0 3) Landscape sheets 3 & 4 show portions of the Tract 2B landscape. These areas are labeled as "not a part". The plans should be revised to show the trees required per D99-061. Some are shown on the drawing, some are missing. |
| 03/27/2007 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES March 26, 2007 C. Schuiteman, AIA SBBL 1001 North Alvernon Way, Suite 105 Tucson, Arizona 85711-1019 Subject: D06-0060 Midvale Commercial Center Revised Development Plan Dear Mr. Schuiteman: Your submittal of February 26, 2007 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 7 Copies Revised Development Plan (ESD, Fire, Wastewater, Landscape, Zoning, Engineering, DSD) 4 Copies Revised Landscape Plan (Landscape, Zoning, Engineering, DSD) 2 Copies Recorded Lot Combination Covenant (Zoning, DSD) 2 Copies Recorded Cross Access and Parking Agreement(s) (Zoning, DSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 791-5608 extension 1179. Sincerely, Patricia Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 620-0535 |