Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Permit Number - D06-0058
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/09/2007 | GBONILL1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Approved | |
| 01/09/2007 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 01/10/2007 | JOSE ORTIZ | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | No off-site improvements proposed nor required; therefore Traffic approves this proposed development plan. |
| 01/12/2007 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | NO COMMENT D06-0058 MARK AREL ARCHITECTS, P.C. BURGER KING -------------------------------------------------------- Confidentiality and Nondisclosure Notice: This email transmission and any attachments are intended for use by the person(s)/entity(ies) named above and may contain confidential/privileged information. Any unauthorized use, disclosure or distribution is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by email, and delete or destroy all copies plus attachments. |
| 01/17/2007 | JCLARK3 | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Denied | * No known landfills within 1000 ft. of this development. * Detail does not show side wall protection. Per development standards 10 ft. clear area is required within side wall protection. * At the 45 degree angle of the south enclosure the ingress/egress for the service vehicle is in conflict w/parking medians shown to the south. * 14'x40' service area of the south enclosure is encrouching the 14'x40' service area of the north enclosure. * Restaurants generally have a grease storage container which may not be stored with the 10'x10' clear area for the dumpster. |
| 01/19/2007 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | DATE: January 19, 2007 TO: Ferne Rodriguez, Development Services FROM: Glenn Hicks Parks and Recreation 791-4873 ext. 215 Glenn.Hicks@tucsonaz.gov CC: SUBJECT: D06-0058 Burger King: Development Plan(1/08/07) Staff has no comments. |
| 01/22/2007 | FRODRIG2 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Approved | Transportation Information Rezoning, Plat, and Development Plan Reviews Provided by: Pima Association of Governments Data Services Department Kristen Zimmerman kzimmerman@pagnet.org www.pagnet.org This information is provided to assess the impact of the proposed development on surrounding traffic and roads. X City of Tucson, Development Services Department, Community Design Review Committee City of Tucson, Development Services Department, Rezoning Town of Marana Planning Department Case Number Date The transportation impact of this plan cannot be determined at this time: more detailed information regarding the nature of the development is required. This project has no associated transportation impacts. 953 Average number of daily trips (ADT) forecasted as a result of the proposed development 64,140 2-way capacity 45,330 Most recent (less than 3 years old) 2-way PAG traffic count If the above value is greater than 500 ADT, additional traffic and road impacts are noted below. STREET IDENTIFICATION Nearest existing major street Golf Links (Wilmot to Kolb) Is a road improvement planned as part of PAG's 5-Year Transportation Improvement Program? Yes X No (See http://www.pagnet.org/tip/ for more information on the TIP program.) VOLUME, CAPACITY, TRAFFIC GENERATION CONSIDERATIONS (See http://www.pagnet.org/TPD/DataTrends/ for more information on local traffic volumes.) 2005 2030 2005 2030 2005 2030 TRANSIT AND BIKEWAYS CONSIDERATIONS Existing bus service Rte 17, 30 min, 0 mi. 83 Express, 1 AM and 1 PM trip, 0 mi (Route, frequency, distance from proposed development) Existing bikeway Planned improvement Number of Road Capacity Daily Traffic Volume (ADT) D06-0058 1/21/2007 Estimated by PAG Traffic Model (ADT) Lanes 40,211 49,500 64,140 64,140 6 6 D06-0058.xls 1/21/2007 |
| 01/23/2007 | TIM ROWE | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | January 23, 2007 To: Mark Abel Architects, P.C. Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department From: Chandubhai C. Patel, P.E. Pima County Development Services Department Development Review Division (Wastewater) Subject: Burger King ( Rolling Hills Square ) Development Plan – 1st Submittal, D06-0058 The drawings for the proposed Development Plan for the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. ALL SHEETS. Add the project number, D06-0058 to the title block of each sheet. This number should be shown larger and bolder than any cross-reference numbers. ALL SHEETS. Show the name of the project in larger bold letters. SHEET 1. Add a general Note that reads: THIS PROJECT HAS --------- PROPOSED AND--------- EXISTING WASTEWATER FIXTURE UNIT EQUIVALENTS, PER TABLE 13.20.040(F)(1) in PIMA COUNTY CODE 13.20 Also, fill in the blanks in the above note. 4. SHEET 1. Add a Permitting Note that reads: A PROJECT CONSTRUCTION PERMIT MUST BE SECURED FROM THE PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT BEFORE BEGINNING ANY WORK ON THIS PROJECT. 5. SHEET 2. Provide a LEGEND, and show symbols for the proposed and existing private and/or public sewers. Use distinctively different line types for these sewers. These line types and the symbols should clearly match those used on Sheets 2 for depicting these types of sewer lines. 6. SHEET 1. REFERENCE SITE PLAN. This plan is totally illegible. Please provide an improved quality site plan which can be used to understand this project. 7. SHEET 2. Show the existing and proposed private/public sewer lines that will serve this project. Once you show the sewer lines, we will be able to provide our review comments for them. 8. We will require a revised set of drawings and a response letter addressing each comment. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. The next submittal of this project will be the 2nd submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $100.00 made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER must accompany the revised set of bluelines and the response letter. For any questions regarding the fee schedule, please go to http://www.pimaxpress.com/SubDivision/Documents/Fees.PDF where you may find the appropriate wastewater review fees at the bottom of page 1. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. If you have any questions regarding the above comments, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Chandubhai C. Patel, P.E. Civil Engineering Manager Telephone: (520) 740-6563 |
| 01/24/2007 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | 4350 E. Irvington Road, Tucson, AZ 85714 Post Office Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702 WR#175855 January 24, 2007 Dear Mr. Mark Abel : SUBJECT: Burger King D06-0058 Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the development plan submitted January 10, 2007. It appears that there are no conflicts with the existing facilities within the boundaries of this proposed development. TEP will require a written legal description and sketch for the 15’ X 15’, for the transformer and a 10’ strip easement for the existing service that crosses this property from the transformer based on TEP’s Land Department research. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. In order to apply for electric service, call the New Construction Department at (520) 918-8300. Submit a final set of plans including approved site, offsite and electrical load plans. Include a CD with the AutoCAD version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Your final plans should be sent to: Tucson Electric Power Company Attn: Ms. Mary Boice New Business Project Manager P. O. Box 711 (DB-101) Tucson, AZ 85702 520-917-8732 Please call the area Designer Nancy DiMaria at (520) 918-8267, should you have any questions. Sincerely, Henrietta Noriega Office Specialist Design/Build hn Enclosures cc: P. Gehlen, City of Tucson (Email) N. DiMaria, Tucson Electric Power |
| 01/29/2007 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: D06-0058 BURGER KING/DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE: January 29, 2007 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: Sheet DP-1 is too fuzzy and will not scan properly. Please provide a copy that is readable. Provide a “blank” Address Block in lower right corner of sheet DP-1 (min. size to be 3” x 5”). Label Section, Township and Range on Vicinity Map. Label Section Corners on Vicinity Map. jg |
| 02/01/2007 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) LUC 3.7.3.4 allows for shrubs in the sight visibility triangles up to 30" in height. We recommend that the note on L-2 be revised. 2) Per DS 2-06.3.8.D, trees with the potential for overhanging a walkway, driveway, bicycle path, parking space, or street must be of a type that, at maturity, provides a canopy with an understory height clearance of eight (8) feet. Revise note 26 on sheets L-1 & L-2. 3) Revise note 1 on L-1 & L-2. The plan does not propose right of way landscaping. 4) Note 30 on sheets L-1 & L-2 is not applicable. We suggest the following general note for plans in the City of Tucson: "landscaping may be placed in the public right-of-way, if the landscaping is approved by the City Engineer or designee and if it complies with the City Engineer's requirements on construction, irrigation, location, and plant type." Seperate permits are required. 5) Submit an irrigation plan. LUC 3.7.4.5.C, DS 2-06.5.4 & DS 2-07.2.2.C. RESUBMITTAL OF ALL PLANS IS REQUIRED. |
| 02/05/2007 | FRODRIG2 | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Approved | No comment |
| 02/08/2007 | SUZANNE BOHNET | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: February 8, 2007 To: Patricia Gehlen CDRC/Zoning Manager FROM: Suzanne Bohnet, CFM Engineering Division SUBJECT: 7006 E. Golf Links Rd. Burger King Rolling Hills Square Development Plan D06-0058 (First Review) T14S, R15E, Section 30 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Revised Development Plan. The Engineering Division has reviewed the Development Plan and does not recommend approval at this time. The following review comments must be addressed. Development Plan Comments: 1. Provide a legible Development Plan for the entire shopping center, currently referred to as "Development Plan Reference Only" DP-1. 2. Provide truncated domes at the curb access ramps (Keynote 11). Submit a revised Development Plan with a detailed response letter detailing how each comment has been addressed. Further comments may be forthcoming following review of any revisions. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550 x1188 or suzanne.bohnet@tucsonaz.gov. Suzanne Bohnet, CFM Engineering Associate |
| 02/09/2007 | PGEHLEN1 | TUCSON WATER NEW AREA DEVELOPMENT | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 02/09/2007 | ED ABRIGO | PIMA COUNTY | ASSESSOR | Passed | |
| 02/09/2007 | ROBERT YOUNG | PIMA COUNTY | PIMA CTY - DEV REVIEW | Passed | |
| 02/14/2007 | TERRY STEVENS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Terry Stevens Lead Planner PROJECT: D06-0058 Burger King Development Plan TRANSMITTAL: 02/14/07 DUE DATE: 02/06/07 COMMENTS: 1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is 02/05/08. 2. Provide a copy of the original stamped and approved Development Plan, D00-025, with all accompanying sheets relevant to the Burger King site. Provide information verifying that this shopping center meets the requirements of a shopping center in regards to parking. The requirements are that more than 50% of the shopping center GFA is being used as a retail space. If this is the case the parking can be 1:200 for the entire shopping center. See LUC Sec. 3.3.5.6.A. Providing the above information can reduce the number of required parking spaces for the proposed Burger King project.. This will then allow additional space for the required loading zone. See later comment regarding loading zones. 3. DS 2-05.2.1.D A small, project-location map shall be drawn on the first sheet of the development plan, preferably in the upper right corner. The map should cover approximately one (1) square mile, be drawn at a minimum scale of 3" = 1 mile, and provide the following information. 1. Identify conditions within the square mile area, such as major streets and watercourses. 2. Section, township, and range; section corners; north arrow; and the scale will be labeled. 4. DS 2-05.2.1.K Provide the rezoning case number (C9-72-37) near the lower right corner, next to the title block. Provide also the conditions of approval for the rezoning case. 5. DS 2-05.2.2.A, .1, .2 List the names, addresses, and telephone numbers of the developer of the project. 6. DS 2-05.2.2.B.1 The existing zoning as indicated (C2) is correct but the following note PAD is incorrect. This is not a Planned Area Development. Please remove from plan. 7. DS 2-05.2.2.B.2. This project has been assigned the Development Plan number D06-0058. Place this case number and the original Development Plan number D00-0025 near the lower right corner, next to the title block. 8. DS 2-05.2.2.B.3 List the proposed use of the property. The use per the LUC is "Food Services "30" subject to: 3.5.4.6.C and 3.5.13.5." 9. DS 2-05.2.2.B.10 Provide a note stating that this project is designed meet the overlay zone criteria: Sec. 2.8.3 Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Setback Zone. 10. DS 2-05.2.4.B Provide all existing zoning classifications on and adjacent to the project. 11. DS 2-05.2.4.D.3 The PAAL width between the existing curb at the most northwest parking space and the new center island does not appear to met the required 24' width. Provide dimension. 12. DS 2-05.2.4.F Provide the location of the future curb and future sight visibility triangles as per the MS&R criteria. 13. DS 2-05.2.4.K Provide a detail of the proposed handicap ramps, including ramp slope, width, landings, location and dimensions of truncated domes, etc. Access ramps at crosswalks connecting to sidewalks must be provided. In addition Truncated Dome (early warning systems) must be added to all access ramps where transitioning from the pedestrian area to the vehicular use area or at HC access aisles transitioning to the sidewalk area. 14. DS 2-05.2.4.N Provide on the footprint of the proposed structure the height and dimensions of the building. 15. DS 2-05.2.4.O Show the location and size of the required loading zone. Provide a note as to the number of required and provided loading zones. See LUC Sec.3.4.5. 16. DS 2-05.2.4.P Provide dimensioned details of a standard parking space and the handicap parking spaces. See ANSI A117.1-2003 for required sizes of a standard and van accessible handicap parking spaces. At least one of the handicap parking spaces must be van accessible. Provide a detail and location of the required handicap parking signage. FYI: The minimum height from grade to the bottom of the sign per City of Tucson standards is 7'-0". Revise the required and provided parking calculations based on comment #2. Per DS 3-05.2.1.C.2.c The minimum number of required stacking spaces for a facility with one drive through lane is six (6) vehicle spaces. Clearly indicate on the plan the location of all required stacking spaces. 17. DS 2-05.2.4.Q Show, on the drawing, off-street bicycle parking locations, including materials for lighting and paving, type of security, dimensions, specific type of rack and the number of bicycles it supports, and the location and type of directional signage. When adjacent to pedestrian paths, indicate the width of clearance available for the pedestrian area. For specifics, refer to Development Standard 2-09.0. Provide, as a note, calculations on the number of bicycle spaces required and the number provided. 18. DS 2-05.2.4.U Indicate graphically, where possible, and by notes, in all other instances, compliance with conditions of rezoning. 19. DS 2-05.2.4.V Indicate location and type of postal service to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements, such as pedestrian accessibility, utilities, and landscaping. 20. Depending on changes to the plan and responses to the above comments further comments may be forth coming. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Terry Stevens, (520) 791-5550 ext. 2000. TLS C:\planning\cdrc\developmentplan\D06-0058dp.doc |
| 02/16/2007 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Approved | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN COMMENTS Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT D06-0058 Burger King () Tentative Plat (XXXX Dvelopment Plan (XXXX) Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other CROSS REFERENCE: C9-72-37 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: South Pantano Area Plan GATEWAY ROUTE: Kolb/Golf Links COMMENTS DUE BY: 02/06/2007 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment (XXXX) Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies with Plan Policies () See Additional Comments Attached () No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: () Resubmittal Required: () Tentative Plat () Development Plan () Landscape Plan () Other REVIEWER: drcorral 791-4505 DATE: 01/26/07 |
| 02/22/2007 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES February 22, 2007 Mark Abel Architects, P.C. Mark Abel Architects, P.C. 21 E. Sixth Street, suite 320 Tempe, Arizona 85281 Subject: D06-0058 Burger King Development Plan Dear Mark: Your submittal of January 8, 2007 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 7 Copies Revised Development Plan (ESD, Wastewater, Addressing, Landscape, Engineering, Zoning, DSD) 4 Copies Revised Landscape Plan (Landscape, Engineering, Zoning, DSD) 2 Copies Last Approved Development Plan for Burger King (Zoning, DSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 791-5608 extension 1179. Sincerely, Patricia Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: (480) 838-1694 dp-resubmittal |