Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Permit Number - D06-0055
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11/29/2006 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 11/30/2006 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Denied | Provide fire lanes so no part of the building is over 150 feet from approved fire lane. Provide turn around as needed see IFC Section 503 as amended. Provide hydrants so no part of the building has a hose lay over 300 feet from a hydrant. See IFC Section 508 as amended. Automatic fire sprinklers may substitute for most of these requirements. |
| 12/01/2006 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | 4350 E. Irvington Road, Tucson, AZ 85714 Post Office Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702 WR#173869 December 1, 2006 Dear Mr. Scheibe: SUBJECT: SPRINGS GYMNASTICS D06-0055 Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the development plan submitted November 29, 2006 It appears that there are no conflicts with the existing facilities within the boundaries of this proposed development. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. Any relocation costs will be billable to the customer. In order to apply for electric service, call the New Construction Department at (520) 918-8300. Submit a final set of plans including approved site, offsite and electrical load plans. Include a CD with the AutoCAD version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Your final plans should be sent to: Tucson Electric Power Company Attn: Ms. Mary Boice New Business Project Manager P. O. Box 711 (DB-101) Tucson, AZ 85702 520-917-8732 Please call the area Designer Todd Stocksdale at (520) 917-8715, should you have any questions. Sincerely, Henrietta Noriega Office Specialist Design/Build hn Enclosures cc: F. Rodriguez, City (Email) T. Stocksdale, Tucson Electric Power |
| 12/01/2006 | PAUL MACHADO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | To: Patricia Gehlen DATE: December 1, 2006 CDRC/Zoning Manager SUBJECT: Springs Gymnastics, 9694 E. Rita Commerce Dr. Development Plan D06-0055 (First Review) T15S, R15E, Section 26 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Development Plan and Drainage Report. The Development Plan (DP) and Drainage Report (DR) cannot be approved as submitted. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal. Development Plan: 1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the DP. 2. The DP will not approved prior to the construction/completion of the temporary cul-de-sac. 3. Delete General note no. 5. Does not pertain to project. 4. As per the Federal ADA requirements, all wheel chair ramps shall have the truncated domes instead of the standard grooves that are shown on COT SD 207. Aside from the Truncated Domes, all wheel chair ramps shall be constructed in accordance with COT SD 207. 5. Label existing and future sight visibility triangles per D.S. 2-02.2.1.10. 6. Show all points of egress and ingress including locations and width of driveways and parking area access lanes (P.A.A.L.) per D.S. 2-02.2.1.11. 7. Please label all vehicular, bicycle, pedestrian, and handicapped circulation clearly identified per D.S. 2-02.2.1.12. 8. Fully-dimensioned loading space(s) and maneuvering area(s) per D.S. 2-02.2.1.14. 9. Please provide Drainage patterns and finished grades per D.S. 2-02.2.1.16. 10. Please list estimated cut & fill quantities per D.S. 2-02.2.1.17. 11. All easement of record must be graphically shown on the plan together with recording docket and page per D.S. 2-02.2.1.20. 12. Add the basin(s) maintenance responsibility note per S.M.D.D.F.M. 2.3.1.6 C 1 and 2 to the TP/DP. 13. Dimension from street monument lines to existing and proposed curbs, sidewalks, driveways, and utility lines per D.S. 2-02.2.1.21. 14. Location and orientation of existing major physical features, such as railroad tracks and drainageways per D.S. 2-02.2.1.22. 15. Please provide existing topographic contours at intervals not exceeding two (2) feet and/or spot elevations as pertinent and Bench Mark based on City of Tucson Datum, including City Field Book and page number per D.S. 2-02.2.1.23. Include the datum in the description, i.e.: NAVD 88 or NVGD 1929. Correct the title for the Basis of Elevation. 16. Show all fences, walls, or vegetation for screening and sight visibility by type, material, height, location and spacing per D.S. 2-02.2.1.27. 17. Show Development plan number (D06-0055) on all sheets per D.S. 2-02.2.1.29. 18. Show refuse container location, size, and access thereto fully dimensioned per D.S. 2-02.2.1.32 and D.S. 6-01.0. A 10'x10' clear area (bollard to bollard) inside the enclosure is required. 19. A permit or a private improvement agreement will be necessary for any work performed within the Right-of-way. Contact Permits and Codes at (520) 791-5100 for permit information. 20. Please show a typical cross section of the P.A.A.L. or call out the percentage of slopes. Call out the GB at the D/W, if applicable. 21. Please show the proposed roof drainage patterns, 100% of the 10-year flow must be conveyed under the sidewalks including any other site drainage as well. Please provide supporting calculations to demonstrate compliance with D.S. 3-01.4.4. If the location(s) of the roof scuppers have not yet been decided, a general note indicating sidewalk scuppers will be used when the roof scuppers locations have been designed and located will suffice. Edit note to include any other site drainage under pedestrian paths. 22. Add note: "Depress all landscaped areas 6" maximum for water harvesting". Include depressed curb opening to allow water in to landscaped areas. 23. A Stormwater pollution prevention plan is required with the grading submittal. Contact Paul P. Machado at 791-5550 x1193 for additional information. 24. "A separate grading permit and Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans (SWPPP's) will be required for this project. Submit 4 sets of grading and SWPPP's with text, upon completion and submittal of a grading permit application. A grading permit may not be issued prior to site plan approval. Subsequent comments may be necessary, depending upon the nature and extent of revisions that occur to the plans". 25. The proposed temporary cul-de-sac is encroaching onto private property to the east. An agreement or easement will need to generated from the rightful owner in order to be able to use this land for the cul-de-sac. Provide documentation upon the next submittal. Drainage Report: 1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the DR. 2. This review was performed for Tentative Plat purposes only. Final review and acceptance will be at the grading plan stage. 3. Although it is stated in the DR that surrounding improvements will significantly reduce the amount of off-site water affecting the site, it will not be completely eliminated. All sites must accept and discharge at the historic points. Revise retention calculations in the DR. 4. If applicable, add the basin(s) maintenance responsibility note and checklist per S.M.D.D.F.M. 2.3.1.6 C 1 and 2 to the DR. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550 x1193 or Paul.Machado@ci.tucsonaz.govs Paul P. Machado Senior Engineering Associate City of Tucson/Development Services Department 201 N. Stone Avenue P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210 (520) 791-5550 x1193 office (520) 879-8010 fax C:/9694 E. Rita Commerce Dr. CDRC |
| 12/04/2006 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) For the calculation of plant growth coverage, two years' growth will be used as a base for shrubs and ground covers. Revise the coverage calculations as necessary. DS 2-06.3.5.b 2) The plants included for coverage in the street landscape borders would cover a maximum area of twenty square feet (assuming a five-foot diameter) in two years. Revise the calculations. 3) Dimension the length and width of landscape borders on the landscape plan per DS 2-07.2.2.A.2.f. The coverage requirements are based on the width of the border (the area between the property line and the required screen or building on the site). DS 2-06.3.4.C.2 4) Vegetation or structures higher than thirty (30) inches must be located outside of the sight visibility triangle. Show the SVT's on the landscape plan. DS 2-07.2.2 5) Revise the landscape plans to show and identify the limits of grading. DS 2-07.2.2.B.5 6) Revise the native plant preservation plans to show and identify the limits of grading. DS 2-15.3.4.A 7) Number all landscape, NPP, irrigation and related sheets. DS 2-05.2.0 8) The Native Plant Preservation Plan shall affirm, by a statement on the Plan, conformance with the requirements of the Federal Endangered Species Act and the Arizona Native Plant Law. LUC 3.8.4.5 Revise or add notes as necessary. 9) Revise the NPP plans regarding # 4. This PIP appears to be located in proposed driveway. Revise the inventory list and calculations as necessary. 10) Revise the landscape plan to show the location of all PIP and TOS plants. DS 2-15.3.4.B 11) Revise the landscape plan to include canopy trees in the street landscape border per LUC 3.7.2.4. The code requires one tree for every thirty-three foot segment and the spacing maximum spacing (by default) between trees cannot exceed sixty-six feet. 12) A vehicular use area must be provided with post barricades or wheel stop curbing designed to prevent parked vehicles from extending beyond the property lines; damaging adjacent landscaping, walls, or buildings and to prevent vehicles from driving onto unimproved portions of the site per DS 3-05.2.3.C. Revise the plans as necessary to provide required curbing. 13) Locate plants within the retention basin per LUC 3.7.4.3. 14) Grading, hydrology, and landscape structural plans are to be integrated to make maximum use of site storm water runoff for supplemental on-site irrigation purposes. The landscape plan shall indicate use of all runoff, from individual catch basins around single trees to basins accepting flow from an entire vehicular use area or roof area. LUC 3.7.4.3.B Revise the plans to show water harvesting areas and to incorporate basins into planting details where appropriate. 15) Show locations of protective fencing required to protect any remaning natural areas. DS 2-06. Figure 1, DS 2-15.5.0 16) Revise the grading plan to identify the limits of grading and identify areas ro remain natural. DS 11-01.4.0 RESUBMITTAL OF ALL PLANS IS REQURED. |
| 12/04/2006 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: D06-0055 SPRINGS GYMNASTICS/DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE: December 4, 2006 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: 1.) To Title Block add brief legal description that includes Subdivision Name, Lot number and Book and Page. jg |
| 12/04/2006 | FRODRIG2 | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Approved | No comments |
| 12/04/2006 | JOSE ORTIZ | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Denied | December 4, 2006 ACTIVITY NUMBER: D06-0055 PROJECT NAME: Spring Gymnastic PROJECT ADDRESS: 9694 E Rita Commerce Dr PROJECT REVIEWER: Jose E. Ortiz PE, Traffic Engineer Resubmittal Required: Traffic Engineering does not recommend approval of the Development Plan; therefore a revised Development Plan is required for re-submittal. The following items must be revised or added to the plat. 1. Include a response letter with the next submittal that states how all comments have been addressed. 2. If applicable, illustrate and label future access points and future SVTs (DS 2-05.2.4.R). 3. List ROW width, recordation data, type, and dimension future width of paving, curbs, curb cuts and sidewalks along both Rita Commerce Drive and Distribution Way. (DS 2-05.2.2.D) 4. Is the temporary cul de sac existing or to be constructed for this development? If to be constructed with this development then a private improvement agreement (PIA) will be necessary for the proposed work to be performed within the Right-of-way. An approved development plan is required prior to applying for a PIA. Contact the PIA Coordinator for additional PIA information at 791-5550 ext. 1107. 5. If the cul de sac is existing then a permit for access will be necessary for any work performed within the Right-of-way. Contact Permits and Codes at (520) 791-5100 for permit information. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-4259 x305 or Jose.Ortiz@tucsonaz.gov |
| 12/05/2006 | JCLARK3 | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Denied | * No known landfill within 1000 feet of this development. * At the location of the enclosure as shown it does not appear that the service truck can service the dumpster and then back away and exit the site. Note: If the enclosure can be switched with the loading zone then the service trucks can utilize the PAAL to turnaround. * No provisions shown or discussed for recycling. * Enclosure detail requires a 10' clear area infront of the rear and side walls protection. |
| 12/05/2006 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Approved | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN COMMENTS Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT D06-0055 Springs Gymnastics 12/05/06 () Tentative Plat (XXXX) Development Plan () Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other CROSS REFERENCE: Annexation C9-84-84 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Esmond Station GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: COMMENTS DUE BY: 12/07/06 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment (XXXX) Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies with Plan Policies () See Additional Comments Attached () No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: () Resubmittal Required: () Tentative Plat () Development Plan () Landscape Plan () Other REVIEWER: D. R. Corral 791-4505 DATE: 12/05/06 |
| 12/07/2006 | TERRY STEVENS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Terry Stevens Lead Planner PROJECT: D06-0055 Springs Gymnastics Development Plan TRANSMITTAL: 12/07/06 DUE DATE: 12/07/06 COMMENTS: 1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is 12/06/07. 2. DS 2-05.2.1.K Provide the annexation case # C9-84-84 and the subdivision case number # C12-95-03 near the lower right corner, next to the title block on all sheets. 3. DS 2-05.2.2.B.2 This project has been assigned the case number D06-0055. List the case number in the lower right corner next to the title block of all plan sheets including the Landscape and NPPO sheets. 4. DS 2-05.2.2.B.3 The proposed use listed in the general notes should read as follows: Educational Use: Instructional School "34". 5. DS 2-05.2.2.B.10 Add a note stating that this project is designed to meet the following overlay zone(s) criteria: Sec. 2.8.5 Airport Environs Zone (AEZ). Clearly indicate on the site plan that this project is within the ADC-3 and the NCD-65 portions of the AEZ overlay zone. See following comments regarding requirements for ADC-3. Add a note in the general notes indicating that this proposed structure will be constructed with sound attenuation, to reduce the interior noise level to an Ldn of 45 or less. See LUC Sec. 2.8.5.6.A.1 Provide, as part of this submittal, a floor plan of the proposed structure with dimensions for each room. LUC Sec. 2.8.5.8.C.1.e requires any meeting space and function areas where people gather in excess of 5000 square feet in area must be located underground. 6. DS 2-05.2.3.B If applicable, All easements shall be drawn on the plan. The recordation information, location, width, and purpose of all easements on site will be stated. 7. DS 2-05.2.4.B Please clarify the surrounding zoning classifications. Enlarge type and possibly use a different font to clarify the zoning is I-1 not 1-1. 8. DS 2-05.2.4.D.3 Provide a detail of the backup spurs clearly indicating the required 3' curb radius and the 3'clear area behind the backup spur as per DS 3-05 Figure 2. DS 3-05.2.3.C.1 The vehicular use area (paved area) must be provided with curbing or post barricades to prevent vehicles from driving on to unimproved portions of the site. Missing along the east and south portions of the vehicular use area. The opening in the curbing near the loading zone must be provided with post barricades (provide on site plan with dimensions between posts) 9. DS 2-05.2.4.K See DS 2-08 for required pedestrian circulation criteria. DS 2-08.4.1.A At least one (1) sidewalk will be provided to a project from each street on which the project has frontage. Provide a sidewalk from Rita Commerce Dr. and Distribution Way with cross walks and handicap ramps where required. DS 2-08.4.1.B A sidewalk (minimum 4' in width) will be provided adjacent and parallel to any PAAL where buildings are located. The sidewalk along the east side of the building is required to extend to the southeast corner of the building. Per DS 3-05.2.2.B.1 a 5' pedestrian refuge area must be maintained between any enclosed structure and a PAAL. 10. DS 2-05.2.4.N Provide dimensions for the footprint of the building on page C-1. 11. DS 2-05.2.4.P Provide on the plan and in the calculations the number of required and provided handicap parking spaces. The number of required handicap parking spaces required when 56 parking spaces are provided per the IBC Sec. 1106.1 is a total of three (3) not two (2) as indicated on the plan. The number of van accessible handicap parking spaces required is one (1) for every six or fraction of six accessible parking spaces. See IBC Sec. 1106.5. Revise plan and calculations. 12. DS 2-05.2.4.Q The number of required bicycle parking spaces indicated is not correct. Per LUC Sec.3.3.4 Civic Use Group for Instructional Schools 8% of the provided number of parking spaces with 10% being class 1 and 90% being class 2 are required. The bicycle racks indicated on details 13 and 17 of Sheet C-3 do not meet the requirements of DS 2-09. See DS 2-09.2.2 for class 1 requirements and DS 2-09.2.3 for class 2 requirements. See DS 2-09.4 for location requirements for class 1 and class 2 bicycle parking spaces. Note: Class 2 bicycle parking spaces must be located within 50' of the main entrance and along other sides of the building which have entrances. See DS 2-09.5 for bicycle parking layout and security measures. Provide a detail clearly indicating the required clearances, parking area delineation, aisle widths, covering for class 1 parking spaces, surface materials 13. If applicable provide location and type of postal service to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements, such as pedestrian accessibility, utilities and landscaping. 14. If applicable, provide location and type of site lighting. 15. If applicable provide location, type, height and size of existing or proposed signage including billboards. 16. Per LUC Sec. 2.8.5.8.C.1.b For building with in the ADC-3 overlay zone. The maximum Floor Area Ratio (FAR) for this use is limited to .20 not 2.00 as indicated in the notes. Revise notes. Per LUC Sec. 2.8.5.8.C.1.d For building with in the ADC-3 overlay zone. The maximum building height is sixty-two (62) feet not seventy-five (75) feet as indicated in the notes. Revise notes. 17. Depending on changes to the plan and responses to the above comments further comments may be forth coming. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Terry Stevens, (520) 791-5550 ext. 2000. TLS C:\planning\cdrc\developmentplan\D06-0055dp.doc |
| 12/08/2006 | TIM ROWE | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER December 8, 2006 TO: Wayne Scheibe Wayne Scheibe Architect. THRU: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager City of Tucson, Development Services Department FROM: Chandubhai C. Patel, P.E. Pima County Development Services Department Development Review Division (Wastewater) SUBJECT: Springs Gymnastics School Development Plan - 1st Submittal D06-055 The proposed sewer collection lines to serve the above-referenced development have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ), and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. 1. ALL SHEETS. Add the project number, D06-055 to the title block of each sheet. This number should be shown larger or bolder than any cross-reference numbers. 2. Provide a letter from PCWMD Development Services, written within the past 90 days, stating that the reatment and conveyance system capacity for this project is available. A capacity request form may be found at http://www.pima.gov/wwm/forms/docs/CapResponseRequest.pdf 3. SHEET 1 & 2. Show the size of the existing public sewer line located in Distribution Way, and its Pima County sewer plan number. 4. SHEET 1 & 2. Show the six digit Pima County manhole numbers for the existing public manholes located in Distribution Way upstream and downstream from the point of connection of the new BCS to this sewer line, with their rim and invert elevations. 5. SHEET 1 & 2. Label the new BCS, and show its size, length and slope. 6. SHEET 1 & 2. Show the rim and invert elevation of the cleanout and the invert elevation of the BCS where it connects the existing public sewer. 7. SHEET 1 & 2. Make the symbols of the cleanout and manholes on the sewer lines the same as those shown in the LEGEND. 8. Several General Notes for wastewater are required in a Development Plan. Please make yourself familiar with them and show these notes on the front page. 9. Several Permitting Notes are required for wastewater in a Development Plan. Please make yourself familiar with them and show these notes on the front page. 10. This project is proposing to construct a temporary cul-de-sac. Make sure this street does not obstruct the PCWMD's maintenance vehicles which might need to reach the manholes on the existing 8-inch public sewer line. 11. We will require a revised set of drawings and a response letter addressing each comment. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. The next submittal of this project will be the 2nd submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $100.00 made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER must accompany the revised set of bluelines and the response letter. For any questions regarding the fee schedule, please go to http://www.pimaxpress.com/SubDivision/Documents/Fees.PDF where you may find the appropriate wastewater review fees at the bottom of page 1. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. If you have any questions regarding the above comments, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Chandubhai C. Patel, P.E. Telephone: (520) 740-6563 Copy: Project file |
| 12/11/2006 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES December 11, 2006 Pete Palmer APN Builders PO Box 17928 Tucson, Arizona 85731-7928 Subject: D06-0055 Spring Gymnastics Development Plan Dear Pete: Your submittal of November 30, 2006 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 9 Copies Revised Development Plan (Fire, Engineering, Traffic, Landscape, Addressing, ESD, Zoning, Wastewater, DSD) 4 Copies Revised Landscape Plan (Engineering, Landscape, Zoning, DSD) 2 Copies Revised NPPO Plan (Landscape, DSD) 2 Copies Revised Drainage Report (Engineering, DSD) 2 Copies Floor Plans (Zoning, DSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 791-5608 extension 1179. Sincerely, Patricia Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 290-1370 |