Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Permit Number - D06-0053
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/12/2007 | PAUL MACHADO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | To: Patricia Gehlen DATE: January 12, 2007 CDRC/Zoning Manager Engineering Division SUBJECT: Tucson Old Pueblo Credit Union, 9725 E. Broadway Blvd. Development Plan D06-0053 (First Review) T14S, R15E, Section 11 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Development Plan. The Development Plan (DP) cannot be approved as submitted. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal. Development Plan: 1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the DP. 2. As per the Federal ADA requirements, all wheel chair ramps shall have the truncated domes instead of the standard grooves that are shown on COT SD 207. Aside from the Truncated Domes, all wheel chair ramps shall be constructed in accordance with COT SD 207. 3. This project is designated to be in a City of Tucson special flood hazard area. Revisions may be necessary to the site plan per the DR. 4. Contact the City of Tucson Transportation Dept. and coordinate with them for the proposed improvements along Broadway Blvd. Provide a sidewalk from the improvement plans to the building on the southside. 5. Label existing and future sight visibility triangles per D.S. 2-02.2.1.10. 6. Please list estimated cut & fill quantities per D.S. 2-02.2.1.17. 7. Please show dimensioned right-of-way, including any applicable Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Plan right-of-way per D.S. 2-02.2.1.19. 8. Add the basin(s) maintenance responsibility note per S.M.D.D.F.M. 2.3.1.6 C 1 and 2 to the TP/DP. 9. Dimension from street monument lines to existing and proposed curbs, sidewalks, driveways, and utility lines per D.S. 2-02.2.1.21. Show the future R/W width. 10. Show Development plan number (D06-0053) on all sheets per D.S. 2-02.2.1.29. 11. Show refuse container location, size, and access thereto fully dimensioned per D.S. 2-02.2.1.32 and D.S. 6-01.0. It appears the plan view shows a one-container enclosure, yet the detail of the enclosure shows it having 2 containers. Also check with John Clark at Environmental Services for the correct length needed for a two-container enclosure. Revise as required. 12. A permit or a private improvement agreement will be necessary for any work performed within the Right-of-way. Contact Permits and Codes at (520) 791-5100 for permit information. 13. Please show the proposed roof drainage patterns, 100% of the 10-year flow must be conveyed under the sidewalks including any other site drainage as well. Please provide supporting calculations to demonstrate compliance with D.S. 3-01.4.4. If the location(s) of the roof scuppers have not yet been decided, a general note indicating sidewalk scuppers will be used when the roof scuppers locations have been designed and located will suffice. 14. "A grading permit and Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans (SWPPP's) will be required for this project. Submit 3 sets of grading and SWPPP's with text; upon completion and submittal of a grading permit application. A grading permit may not be issued prior to site plan approval. Subsequent comments may be necessary, depending upon the nature and extent of revisions that occur to the plans". Drainage Report: 1. The DR was reviewed and found to adequate for Development plan purposes only. Final review and acceptance will be done at the grading plan stage. 2. This project is designated to be in a City of Tucson special flood hazard area. Revise the DR to reflect the requirements accordingly. 3. Provide a detail of the retention basin in the DR. 4. Add the basin maintenance responsibility note per S.M.D.D.F.M. 2.3.1.6 C 1 and 2 to the DR. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550 x1193 or Paul.Machado@ci.tucsonaz.govs Paul P. Machado Senior Engineering Associate City of Tucson/Development Services Department 201 N. Stone Avenue P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210 (520) 791-5550 x1193 office (520) 879-8010 fax C:/9725 E. Broadway Blvd. CDRC Credit Union |
| 01/17/2007 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES January 17, 2007 Antony C. Tsang A.C. Tsang Engineering Group, Inc. 4626 East Fort Lowell, suite S Tucson, Arizona 85712 Subject: D06-0053 Tucson Old Pueblo Credit Union Development Plan Dear Tony: Your submittal of November 16, 2006 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 7 Copies Revised Development Plan (Traffic, ESD, Landscape, Addressing, Zoning, Engineering, DSD) 4 Copies Revised Landscape Plan (Landscape, Zoning, Engineering, DSD) 2 Copies Revised NPPO Plan (Landscape, DSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 791-5608 extension 1179. Sincerely, Patricia Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 325-0979 dp-resubmittal |
| 11/14/2006 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 11/20/2006 | FRODRIG2 | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Approved | No comment |
| 11/20/2006 | JOSE ORTIZ | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Denied | November 20, 2006 ACTIVITY NUMBER: S06-0053 PROJECT NAME: Tucson Old Pueblo Credit Union PROJECT ADDRESS: 9725 E Broadway Blvd. PROJECT REVIEWER: Jose E. Ortiz PE, Traffic Engineer Resubmittal Required: Traffic Engineering does not recommend approval of the Development Plan; therefore a revised Development Plan is required for re-submittal. The following items must be revised or added to the plat. 1. Include a response letter with the next submittal that states how all comments have been addressed. 2. List the ROW width, recordation data, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts and sidewalks. (DS 2-05.2.2.D) 3. A permit or a private improvement agreement will be necessary for any work performed within the Right-of-way. Contact Permits and Codes at (520) 791-5100 for permit information. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-4259 x305 or Jose.Ortiz@tucsonaz.gov |
| 11/29/2006 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | DATE: November 28, 2006 TO: Ferne Rodriguez, Development Services FROM: Glenn Hicks Parks and Recreation 791-4873 ext. 215 Glenn.Hicks@tucsonaz.gov CC: SUBJECT: D06-0053 Tucson Old Pueblo Credit Union: Development Plan(11-16-06) Staff has no comments. |
| 11/30/2006 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | NO COMMENT D06-0053 A.C. TSANG ENGINEERING GROUP, INC. TUCSON OLD PUEBLO CREDIT UNION -------------------------------------------------------- Confidentiality and Nondisclosure Notice: This email transmission and any attachments are intended for use by the person(s)/entity(ies) named above and may contain confidential/privileged information. Any unauthorized use, disclosure or distribution is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by email, and delete or destroy all copies plus attachments. |
| 12/01/2006 | FRODRIG2 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Approved | Transportation Information for Rezoning, Subdivision and Development Review Requests File Number Description Date Reviewed E Pima Association of Governments Sandra C. Holland, Data Services 177 N. Church Avenue, Suite 405 Tucson, AZ 85701 Phone: (520) 792-1093 Fax: (520) 620-6981 www.pagnet.org D06-0053 Tucson Old Pueblo Credit Union 11/30/2006 This analysis is designed to allow jurisdictional planning departments to further assess the traffic impacts of planned residential and commerical developments that PAG expects will generate more than 500 average daily trips. Nearby roadway data include planned improvements, existing and future volumes and capacities, and bus and bike accessibility. 1. Nearest Existing or Planned Major Street 2. Is a street improvement planned as part of PAG's 5-Year Transportation Improvement Program? See http://www.pagnet.org/tip/ for more information on the TIP planning process. Planned Action: STREET IDENTIFICATION 3. Existing (2005) Daily Traffic Volume (reported in ADT) See http://www.pagnet.org/TPD/DataTrends/ for more information. 4. Existing (2005) Daily Capacity (reported in ADT) 5. Existing (2005) Number of Lanes 8. Future (2030) Number of Lanes TRANSIT AND BIKEWAYS CONSIDERATIONS 10. Present Bus Service (Route, Frequency, Distance) 11. Existing or Planned Bikeway Remarks: Street Number 1 Street Number 2, if applicable. Year Year Planned Action: VOLUME/CAPACITY/TRAFFIC GENERATION CONSIDERATIONS 6. Future (2030) Daily Volume (reported in ADT) (Assuming planned transportation improvement projects are completed.) 7. Future (2030) Daily Capacity (reported in ADT) Broadway (Harrison to Stoner) No 0 11,484 2 22,160 66,480 22,320 6 1,174 Rt 8, 10mins, .5miles Bike route with striped shoulder 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9. Average daily traffic (ADT) forecasted as a result of the proposed development Transportation Information for Rezoning, Subdivision and Development Review Requests File Number Description Date Reviewed E Pima Association of Governments Sandra C. Holland, Data Services 177 N. Church Avenue, Suite 405 Tucson, AZ 85701 Phone: (520) 792-1093 Fax: (520) 620-6981 www.pagnet.org D06-0053 Tucson Old Pueblo Credit Union 11/30/2006 This analysis is designed to allow jurisdictional planning departments to further assess the traffic impacts of planned residential and commerical developments that PAG expects will generate more than 500 average daily trips. Nearby roadway data include planned improvements, existing and future volumes and capacities, and bus and bike accessibility. |
| 12/04/2006 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | 4350 E. Irvington Road, Tucson, AZ 85714 Post Office Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702 WR#173652 December 4, 2006 Dear Mr. Tsang: SUBJECT: TUCSON OLD PUEBLO CREDIT UNION D06-0053 Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the development plan submitted November 16, 2006 It appears that there are no conflicts with the existing facilities within the boundaries of this proposed development. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. Any relocation costs will be billable to the customer. In order to apply for electric service, call the New Construction Department at (520) 918-8300. Submit a final set of plans including approved site, offsite and electrical load plans. Include a CD with the AutoCAD version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Your final plans should be sent to: Tucson Electric Power Company Attn: Ms. Mary Boice New Business Project Manager P. O. Box 711 (DB-101) Tucson, AZ 85702 520-917-8732 Please call the area Designer Nancy DiMaria at (520) 918-8267, should you have any questions. Sincerely, Henrietta Noriega Office Specialist Design/Build hn Enclosures cc: P. Gehlen, City (Email) N. DiMaria, Tucson Electric Power |
| 12/04/2006 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 12/04/2006 | JCLARK3 | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Denied | * No known landfill within 1000 feet of this development. * Development Plan only shows one single dumpster enclosure while the detail shows a double dumpster enclosure. * Detail of the double dumpster enclosure doesnot have sufficient width to allow the required 10' clear that is required for each dumpster. A width of 18'-4" is required between the sidewall protection to satisfy the 10' requirement. |
| 12/06/2006 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Add the CDRC case number and any related case numbers to the landscape and native plant preservation plans. DS 2-07.2.1.B 2) Vegetation or structures higher than thirty (30) inches must be located outside of the sight visibility triangle as noted on the plan. Show the SVT's on the landscape plan and relocate any vegetation that typically exceeds thirty inches. DS 2-06.3.7.B.1 3) Revise the native plant preservation plans to show the limits of grading. DS 2-15.3.4.A 4) Revise the landscape plans to show the limits of grading. DS 2-07.2.2.B.5 5) The loading area is required to be screened from the Stoner Avenue per LUC table 3.7.2-I. 6) The site is required to include screening per LUC Table 3.7.2-I. Revise as necessary to include the required screen long Stoner Avenue. 7) Revise the landscape plan plant list to define the abbreviation "RP" used on the plan. 8) All disturbed, grubbed, graded, or bladed areas not otherwise improved shall be landscaped, reseeded, or treated with an inorganic or organic ground cover to help reduce dust pollution. Revise landscape plan to comply. This comment is applicable to areas other than those currently identified on the plan. Areas such as the utility and drainage easements located in undisturbed areas may require a native seed mix LUC 3.7.2.7. DS 2-06.5.2.C 9) The Native Plant Preservation Plan shall affirm, by statement, conformance with the requirements of the Federal Endangered Species Act and the Arizona Native Plant Law. LUC 3.8.4.5 Add reference to the Arizona law in the general notes on the native plant preservation plan. 10) Show and identify existing plants to remain in place on the landscape plan. DS 2-07.2.2.A.1.e 11) Revise the Plant Preservation/Mitigation Totals table to include the "PIP" plants in the "Total On Site" calculation. DS 2-15.3.4.B 12) Fifty (50) percent or more of the area of the street landscape border must be covered with shrubs or vegetative ground cover. The required ground coverage must be achieved within two (2) years from the date of planting. LUC 3.7.2.4.A.5 We have calculated the proposed border along Broadway Boulevard at approximately 630 sq. ft., although at least 970 sq. ft. is required. Revise both borders as/if necessary. The following issues often affect coverage calculations A) The use of vegetation to satisfy the screen requirement is allowed only to provide for alternative treatment and is not in any way meant to imply that the vegetative screen can also be used to meet the landscape requirement. Screening plants are not calculated as part of the 50% vegetative groundcover requirement. B) Maximum Width. In situations where the street landscape border is wider than the minimum ten (10) foot requirement, the landscape border width needs to be determined for the purposes of calculating the fifty (50) percent vegetative coverage requirement. C) The values used for individual plants may be too high. The review is based on mature sizes of plants as published online in the University of Arizona Pima County Cooperative Extension Arid Plant List. RESUBMITTAL OF ALL PLANS IS REQUIRED |
| 12/07/2006 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: D06-0053 TUCSON OLD PUEBLO CREDIT UNION/DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE: December 6, 2006 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: Delete 26/60 from Location Map. Correct Bk 21, Pg. 2 to Bk 21, Pg 12 in Title Block. jg |
| 12/07/2006 | KAROL ARAGONEZ | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Karol Aragonez Planner PROJECT:D06-0053 Tucson Old Pueblo Credit Union Development Plan TRANSMITTAL DATE: December 7, 2006 DUE DATE: December 13, 2006 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is November 16, 2006. 2. All lettering and dimensions are to be the equivalent to twelve (0.12") point including spot elevations. Please revise. DS 2-05.2.1.C 3. Please center the project site within the location map. Provide additional street labels including Stoner Avenue, Harrision Road, Bonanza Avenue, etc. DS 2-05.2.1.D.1 & 2 4. Case number D06-0053 has been assigned to this development plan (DP). Please place this number in the right corner of all sheets of the development plan, landscape plan, NPPO, and any other associated sheets. DS 2-05.2.2.B.2 5. Please revise general note 2 changing the proposed use from Credit Union to "Financial Services Subject to LUC Sec. 3.5.4.5.A & C". DS 2-05.2.2.B.3 & LUC 2.5.3.2.A.6 6. Please add to general note 19 the maximum allowed FAR per Development Designator 28 (0.35). 7. Please revise general note 24 by removing the development standard section from the note. 8. Please revise general note 1 by adding the area of the site by square footage. DS 2-05.2.2.B.11 9. Please draw all existing easements on the plan along with recordation information, location, width, and purpose. If an easement is no longer in use and scheduled to be vacated or has been abandoned, so indicate. If none exist provide response to reviewer's comments. Also if easements are purposed please draw, dimension and label as to their purpose and whether they will be public or private. If none exist provide response to reviewer's comments. DS 2-05.2.3.B & DS 2-05.2.4.G 10. Please provide for both Broadway Boulevard and Stoner Avenue the recordation data, type and dimension width of paving. Provide the right-of-way width for Stoner Avenue. Provide the dimension from back of future curb to the property line along Broadway (12 feet). Dimension the proposed sidewalk in Stoner Avenue (5 feet) and Broadway Boulevard (6 feet). The placement of sidewalks and curbs per the MS&R cross-section for Broadway is required as part of new construction. DS 2-05.2.3.C & DS 3-01.3.3.A 11. Please add all existing zoning designations to the development plan, including across any adjacent rights-of-way. North C-1, east R-2, west C-1, south R-2 and R-1. DS 2-05.2.4.B 12. Please dimension the entrance drive from Stoner Avenue. Minimum two-way PAAL is twenty-four (24) feet. DS 3-05.2.1.C.1 13. The minimum drive-through width leading to the window is eleven (11) feet. The minimum drive-through lane width at the window is nine (9) feet. No more than two (2) car lengths may be less than the minimum width of eleven feet. The drive-through lane for stacking space 3 and four must be eleven feet in width. DS 3-05.2.1.C.2.b 14. Please label one of the drive-though lanes as being serviced by an automative teller only as required by LUC Sec. 3.5.4.5.A. 15. Please clarify on the development plan if the drive-through lanes are covered. If so show the outline of the covered area and provide a one (1) foot setback between the roof overhang and edge of the twelve (12) foot PAAL. DS 3-05.2.2.B.2 16. One-way PAALs are to be clearly marked with directional arrows. Directional signage is to be provided and shown on the development plan at the Broadway entrance to prevent traffic from entering the wrong way into the drive-through service. 17. A four (4) foot wide sidewalk must be provided from Broadway Boulevard connecting to the pedestrian circulation path located within the Broadway. Please provide. DS 2-08.4.1.A & D, DS 2-08.5.1.A 18. Please provide calculations on sheet 1 of 2 for required and provided handicap parking spaces. Of the twenty-six (26) standard parking spaces, two (2) must be accessible and of those two (2), one (1) must be van accessible ANSI 19. Please provide detail of proposed signage for handicap parking spaces per TDOT standards. The sign height shall be seven (7) feet. 20. Please either remove or correct general note 7 on sheet 2 of 2. The information provided in this note is incorrect per parking calculations provided on sheet 1 of 2. Either match or remove note. 21. Please correct details for typical parking and van accessible space. The wheel stop curbing is to be dimensioned two and one-half (2 1/2) feet from the front of the parking spaces. DS 3-05.2.3.C.2 22. Please explain the reason for the five (5) foot dimensioned area shown on the development plan east of the loading space. This same area is not shown on the landscape plan and is included as part of the planting area. 23. Please add to the off-street loading calculation the required space size, which is twelve (12) feet by thirty-five (35) feet. The space dimension must also be corrected on the plan view, which call out the space size as twelve (12) by thirty-two (32), which is incorrect. A radius may be required to allow large delivery vehicles to maneuver into the space. Please contact Engineering as to the proper radius that would be required. DS 2-05.2.4.O, LUC 3.4.5.3, and LUC 3.4.4.2.C 24. Please add to the bicycle parking calculations that the number of provided spaces are all Class 2 per LUC 3.3.7.8.A. Either remove or correct general note 21 to match bicycle calculations shown on sheet 1 of 2. 25. The type of rack proposed does not provide two-point support for bicycles. Please review DS 2-09.8.0 Figure 2 - 7 for acceptable and unacceptable rack designs, Figure 8 for rack location, and Figure 9 for dimensional requirements. 26. Please provide a plan view detail of the proposed class 2 bicycle parking spaces. Single rack spaces placed in a row will allow a minimum of seventy -two (72) inch length per bicycle parking space and a minimum of thirty (30) inches between outer spaces of racks. A five (5) foot wide access aisle measured from the front or rear of the seventy-two (72) inch long parking space will be provided beside each row. Lighting will be provided such that all facilities are thoroughly illuminated and visible from adjacent sidewalks, parking lots, or buildings, during working hours. The surface of the facility can be surfaced the same as for motor vehicle parking or with a minimum of one (1) inch thickness of one-fourth (1/4) inch aggregate material. DS 2-09.5.1, DS2-09.5.2, DS 2-09.5.4, & DS 2-09.6.2 27. Please indicate the location and type of postal service to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements. If mail is to be delivered to an area within a building please state so on the plan. DS 2-05.2.4.V 28. Indicate the locations and types of proposed signs (wall, freestanding, pedestal) to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements and that minimal locational requirements can be met. Also indicate if there are existing billboards on site. Billboards will be required to meet all LUC requirements as stated in LUC Sec. 3.5.4.26. If none exists please state so. DS 2-05.2.4.W & LUC 3.5.4.26 29. All changes, modifications, and/or corrections must be made on all applicable plans including the development plan, landscape plan, and NPPO. Once changes, modifications, and/or corrections are made and reviewed further comments may result. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Karol Aragonez, (520) 791-5550, ext. 1197. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development plan and additional requested documents. |
| 12/19/2006 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Approved | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT D06-0053 Tucson Old Pueblo Credit Union 12/18/06 () Tentative Plat (XXXX) Development Plan (XXXX) Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other CROSS REFERENCE: NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Pantano East GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: COMMENTS DUE BY: 12/13/06 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment (XXXX) Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies () See Additional Comments Attached () No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: () Resubmittal Required: () Tentative Plat () Development Plan () Landscape Plan () Other REVIEWER: D.R. Corral 791-4505 DATE: December 7, 2006 |
| 12/19/2006 | TIM ROWE | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Approv-Cond | December 18, 2006 To: Tony Tsang, AC Tsang Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Project Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department ____________________________________ From: Michael J.Harrington (520-740-6579), representing the Pima County Departments of Wastewater Management and Environmental Quality Subject: Tucson Old Pueblo Credit Union Development Plan - 1st Submittal D06-0053 The proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. This project will be tributary to the Ina Road Water Pollution Control Facility via the Tanque Verde Interceptor. Per written guidance provided by the PCWMD Development Services Section, sufficient conveyance and treatment capacity exists in the downstream public sewerage system for this small project, and a formal capacity response letter from the PCWMD will not be required. All Sheets: Add the development plan case number, D06-0053, to the title block of each sheet. This number should be shown larger or bolder than any cross reference numbers. No wastewater review fees will be charged for sheets where this is the only required revision. Sheet 2: Revise General Note #16, so that it states: THIS PROJECT WILL HAVE ZERO EXISTING AND 60 PROPOSED WASTEWATER FIXTURE UNIT EQUIVALENTS PER TABLE 13.20.045(E)(1) IN PIMA COUNTY CODE 13.20.045(E). Subject to the above, the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality and Wastewater Management Department hereby approve the above referenced submittal of the development plan. The required revision(s) may be shown on the Mylars. Please note the following: Approval of the above referenced submittal does not authorize the construction of public or private sewer collection lines, or water distribution lines. Prior to the construction of such features, a Construction Authorization (Approval To Construct) may need to be obtained from the Pima County Environmental Quality. Also, air quality activity permits must be secured by the developer or prime contractor from the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality before constructing, operating or engaging in an activity which may cause or contribute to air pollution. If you have any questions regarding the above mentioned comments, please contact me at the telephone number shown under my signature on the first page of this letter CC: Project File |
| 12/21/2006 | ED ABRIGO | PIMA COUNTY | ASSESSOR | Passed | |
| 12/21/2006 | PGEHLEN1 | TUCSON WATER NEW AREA DEVELOPMENT | REVIEW | Passed |