Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: REVISION - DEV PLAN
Permit Number - D06-0052
Review Name: REVISION - DEV PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06/08/2007 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 06/13/2007 | CDRC1 | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | June 12, 2007 TO: Antony C. Tsang, P.E. A.C. Tsang Engineering Group, Inc. THRU: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager City of Tucson, Development Services Department FROM: Felipe Ip, Sr Civil Eng. Assistant, Development Review Division Pima County Development Services Department SUBJECT: Washington Federal Savings Amended Development Plan - 3rd Submittal D06-052 The proposed sewer collection lines to serve the above-referenced development have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ), and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. 1. Show the public and private sewer lines using different line-types, so that they can readily be distinguished from each other. Revise the legend accordingly. 2. Revise the plan to show the size of the proposed HCS connection as NEW 4" HCS, as was shown on the previous plan submittal. 3. Revise the plan to show continuation of the 8" PUBLIC sewer main G-264 west of the existing MH 8864-03 on the 20' alley. Provide the pipe material of the sewer G-264 where the proposed HCS connects to the existing sewer. 4. Revise the plan to show the correct flow direction of the existing sewer on Niven Avenue south of public manhole 8864-03, which is north. 5. Revise the plan to show the existing public manholes MH8864-05 south of MH8864-03 and MH8864-02 west of MH8864-03. 6. Label all manholes with their Pima County IMS numbers and invert elevations. Existing public sewer information may be found on the PCWMD Maps and Records (5th floor) or on the PCWMD and PCDOT MapGuide internet websites. 7. This office will require a revised set of bluelines, and a response letter, addressing these comments. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. The next submittal of this project will be the 4th submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $39.00 (made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER) must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. If you have any questions regarding the above comments, please do not hesitate to contact me at 520-740-6707. Copy: Project File |
| 06/13/2007 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | >>> David Mann 06/13/2007 2:18 PM >>> Fire has approved D06-0052, Washington Federal Revision. |
| 06/15/2007 | JOSE ORTIZ | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | |
| 06/25/2007 | GLYNDA ROTHWELL | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | 4350 E. Irvington Road, Tucson, AZ 85714 Post Office Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702 WR#173205 June 25, 2007 AC Tsang Engineering Group, Inc. Attention: Mr. Antony Tsang 4626 E Ft. Lowell, Suite S Tucson, Arizona 85712 Dear Mr. Tsang : SUBJECT: Washington Federal Savings - Resubmittal S06-0052 Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the development plan submitted June 11, 2007. It appears that there are no conflicts with the existing facilities within the boundaries of this proposed development. TEP will need a full set of approved site, electrical load, paving off-site improvements and irrigation plans. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. Any relocation costs will be billable to the customer. In order to apply for electric service, call the New Construction Department at (520) 918-8300. Submit a final set of plans including approved site, offsite and electrical load plans. Include a CD with the AutoCAD version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Your final plans should be sent to: Tucson Electric Power Company Attn: Ms. Mary Boice New Business Project Manager P. O. Box 711 (DB-101) Tucson, AZ 85702 520-917-8732 Please call the area Designer Mike Kaiser at (520) 918-8244, should you have any questions. Sincerely, Elizabeth Miranda Office Support Specialist Design/Build lm Enclosures cc: DSD_CDRC@tucsonaz.gov, City of Tucson (email) M. Kaiser, Tucson Electric Power |
| 06/26/2007 | KAROL ARAGONEZ | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Karol Aragonez Planner PROJECT: D06-0052 Washington Federal Savings Development Plan Revision TRANSMITTAL DATE: June 25, 2007 DUE DATE: July 9, 2007 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. Please provide a copy of the cross access agreement between the project site and property to the east. If access is for future expansion to the east barricades, such as bollards will be required to prevent vehicles from accessing property now. 2. Please provide dimension of parking space abutting dumpster. When sides of a parking space abut a vertical structure over six (6) inches in height the parking space must be a minimum of ten (10) feet in width to allow passengers to enter and exit vehicle. DS 3-05.2.1.B.3 3. The parking calculation for the provided number of handicap parking spaces does not match the number shown in plan view. The development plan show two (2) spaces and the calculation indicates that there is only one (1) space provided. Please correct. Also add note in parking calculations that the provided handicap parking space is van accessible. 4. The handicap parking detail on sheet 2 does not match what is shown in plan view. The plan view show the access aisle as being seven (7) feet in width and the detail shows the aisle as being nine (9) feet in width. Please revise to match. 5. Please add note on plan view that identifies the existing building to be demolished as shown previously. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Karol Aragonez, (520) 791-5550, ext. 74960. KAA S:\zoning review\karol\planning\cdrc\developmentplan\D07-0052dprsub.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development plan and additional requested documents. |
| 06/29/2007 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Approved | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: D06-0052 WASHINGTON FEDERAL SAVINGS/REVISED DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE: June 28, 2007 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and we hereby approve this project. NOTE: 1.) Submit a 24 x 36 Reverse Reading Double Matte Photo Mylar of approved Development Plan to City Planning. Signed and dated Mylar will be forwarded to Pima County Addressing prior to assignment of addresses. 2.) All addresses will need to be displayed per Pima County Address Standards at the time of final inspection. jg |
| 07/03/2007 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Provide a screen for the loading area per LUC Table 3.7.2-I. 2) Per LUC 3.7.2.3.A.1.c the tree planting areas at the south and east boundaries are to be a minimum of four feet wide. Revise as necessary. |
| 07/05/2007 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Denied | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT D06-0052 Washington Federal Savings () Tentative Plat (X) Development Plan (X) Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other CROSS REFERENCE: C9-06-17 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Broadway – Craycroft Area Plan GATEWAY ROUTE: Yes COMMENTS DUE BY: 7/09/07 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment () Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies (X) See Additional Comments Attached () No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: (X) Resubmittal Required: () Tentative Plat (X) Development Plan (X) Landscape Plan (X) Other – Elevations and Color pallet REVIEWER: MSP 791-4505 DATE: 7/03/07 Department of Urban Planning and Design (DUPD) D06-0052 Washington Federal Savings: Revisions – Development Plan July 3, 2007 Staff offers the following comments: Staff approved the previous site design for case D06-0052. Since then there has been a change to the building footprint and location. Therefore a revised site layout has been submitted for staff’s approval. Proposed development plan (Dated REV. 6/1/07) relocated the drive through (bank teller window) lanes from being adjacent to the east building elevation to being adjacent to the south building elevation. Rezoning case C9-06-71, condition number 5, reads: All outdoor activities such as ATM machines shall be located a minimum of 50 feet from the eastern and southern property boundaries. Please provide location(s) (if any) of proposed ATM machines. Please provide location(s) (if any) of ATM machine(s). Location(s) shall comply with rezoning condition number 5. If no ATM is proposed, then please indicate so on sheet 1 of 2 of the development. Any future outdoor ATM services shall comply with rezoning requirements. 2. Staff believes there may have been a change to the requirements of loading zones that may benefit this site. Staff recommends the applicant contact the Department of Development Services, Division of Zoning Review, at 791-5550 to discuss the current loading zone requirements for this particular site. |
| 07/08/2007 | PATRICIA GILBERT | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | TO: Patricia Gehlen; CDRC Coordinator DATE: July 8, 2007 SUBJECT: Engineering review of the Development Plan. The activity number is D06-0052. SUMMARY: The Washington Federal Savings Development Plan and Drainage Report were received by Engineering on June 11th, 2007. Engineering has reviewed the received items and does not recommend approval of the Development Plan. GENERAL COMMENTS 1. A site application card (yellow card) with the CDRC approved development plan must be stamped with signatures for DSD site approval by the following reviewing sections; Fire, Zoning, Handi-cap, Engineering, and Landscape/NPPO. The development plan may be walked through for stamps and site card sign off. No fees are involved in re-stamping the development/tentative plat plans as an approved site plan. 2. Once the process above is complete submit a copy of the approved development plan stamped for site plan approval with two copies of the grading plan, the (green) grading application and a (blue) floodplain use permit application for the grading plan submittal. DEVELOPMENT PLAN COMMENT 1. A minimum setback distance of five (5) feet for a pedestrian refuge area must be maintained between any enclosed structure and a PAAL. Provide a minimum setback of 5' between the loading space and the structure. DS 3-05.2.2.B.1 |
| 07/12/2007 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES July 12, 2007 Antony C. Tsang A.C. Tsang Engineering Group, Inc. 4626 East Fort Lowell, suite S Tucson, Arizona 85712 Subject: D06-0052 Washington Federal Savings Revised Development Plan Dear Tony: Your submittal of June 11, 2007 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 7 Copies Revised Development Plan (Zoning, Landscape, ESD, Engineering, Wastewater, DUPD, DSD) 5 Copies Revised Landscape Plan (Zoning, Landscape, Engineering, DUPD, DSD) 2 Copies Cross Access Agreement (Zoning, DSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 791-5608 extension 1179. Sincerely, Patricia Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 325-0979 dp-resubmittal |
| 07/12/2007 | ANDY VERA | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Acess from Broadway frontage road does not provide adequate manuevering within development without having to back int ingress/egress then complete maneuver to approach enclosure area. DS 6-01.3.1A Does not provide sufficient turning radii for truck to exit onto Nevin Ave. without conflicting with vertical curbs and truncated domes. DS 6-01.0 figure 1 - Turning Radii Clarify 12ft exit lane regarding vertical curbing. Demonstrate turning radii of service vehicle within development. 2. Sheet 2 Dumpster enclosure detail Must identify on detail drawing and annotate materials for the purpose of securing the gates in the open postion during service and when closed. DS 6-01.4.2.C.4 i.e. positive locking with (bayonet) anchors & Qty - 4- 1" dia. X 6" long galvanized pipe flush with concrete. Please correct with resubmittal. |