Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Permit Number - D06-0052
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11/08/2006 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 11/16/2006 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | NO COMMENT D06-0052 A.C. TSANG ENGINEERING GROUP, INC. WASHINGTON FEDERAL SAVINGS -------------------------------------------------------- Confidentiality and Nondisclosure Notice: This email transmission and any attachments are intended for use by the person(s)/entity(ies) named above and may contain confidential/privileged information. Any unauthorized use, disclosure or distribution is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by e-mail, and delete or destroy all copies plus attachments. |
| 11/20/2006 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | 4350 E. Irvington Road, Tucson, AZ 85714 Post Office Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702 WR#173205 November 20, 2006 A.C. Tsang Engineering Group, Inc. Attn: Antony C. Tsang 4626 E Ft. Lowell , Suite S Tucson, Arizona 85712 Dear Mr. Tsang : SUBJECT: Washington Federal Savings D06-0052 Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the development plan submitted November 8, 2006. It appears that there are no conflicts with the existing facilities within the boundaries of this proposed development. TEP will need a full set of approved site, electrical load, paving off-site improvements and irrigation plans. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. Any relocation costs will be billable to the customer. In order to apply for electric service, call the New Construction Department at (520) 918-8300. Submit a final set of plans including approved site, offsite and electrical load plans. Include a CD with the AutoCAD version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Your final plans should be sent to: Tucson Electric Power Company Attn: Ms. Mary Boice New Business Project Manager P. O. Box 711 (DB-101) Tucson, AZ 85702 520-917-8732 Please call the area Designer Mike Kaiser at (520) 918-8244, should you have any questions. Sincerely, Elizabeth Miranda Office Support Specialist Design/Build lm Enclosures cc: P. Gehlen and F. Rodriguez, City of Tucson (email) M. Kaiser, Tucson Electric Power |
| 11/21/2006 | JOSE ORTIZ | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Denied | November 21, 2006 ACTIVITY NUMBER: D06-0052 PROJECT NAME: Washington Federal Savings PROJECT ADDRESS: 4910 E Broadway Blvd PROJECT REVIEWER: Jose E. Ortiz PE, Traffic Engineer Resubmittal Required: Traffic Engineering does not recommend approval of the Development Plan; therefore a revised Development Plan is required for re-submittal. The following items must be revised or added to the plat. 1. Include a response letter with the next submittal that states how all comments have been addressed. 2. List the recordation data, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts and sidewalks. (DS 2-05.2.2.D) 3. The Broadway entrance will be restricted to a right-in/right-out access point or an entry only with no exiting onto the frontage road. 4. If applicable, dimension the width of all ingress/egress points (Tucson City Code, Chapter 25, section 39 & 40) 5. A permit or a private improvement agreement will be necessary for any work performed within the Right-of-way. Contact Permits and Codes at (520) 791-5100 for permit information. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-4259 x305 or Jose.Ortiz@tucsonaz.gov |
| 11/28/2006 | KAROL ARAGONEZ | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Karol Aragonez Planner PROJECT: D06-0052 Washington Federal Savings Development Plan TRANSMITTAL DATE: November 28, 2006 DUE DATE: December 6, 2006 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is November 27, 2007 . 2. Within the location map please show the subject property centered within the one square mile. Additional rights-of-way will be required to be labeled accordingly. DS 2-05.2.1.D.1&2 3. Please include the contour interval with the north arrow/scale. DS 2-05.2.1.H 4. Please list the rezoning case number on all sheets of the landscape plan. DS 2-05.2.1.K 5. Case number D06-0052 has been assigned to this development plan (DP). Please place this number in the right corner of all sheets of the DP, landscape plan, NPPO, and any other associated sheets. DS 2-05.2.2.B.2 6. Please revise general note 2 to include "subject to 3.5.4.5.C", (payday loans supplement 37). LUC 3.5.4.5.C 7. Please draw all existing easements on the plan along with recordation information, location, width, and purpose. If an easement is no longer in use and scheduled to be vacated or has been abandoned, so indicate. If none exist provide response to reviewer's comments. Also if easements are purposed please draw, dimension and label as to their purpose and whether they will be public or private. If none exist provide response to reviewer's comments. DS 2-05.2.3.B & DS 2-05.2.4.G 8. Please revise general note 24 to include "Sec. 2.8.4, Gateway Corridor Zone". DS 2-05.2.2.10 9. Per the MS&R Plan a future right-of-way width of one hundred and fifty (150) feet requires a pedestrian/utility area of twelve (12) feet in width. The DP shows that area as being eighteen (18) feet. Please verify with Engineering that pedestrian area along Broadway Boulevard does not have to be reduced to meet the requirements of the MS&R Plan. 10. This site contains two (2) separate parcels. Provide a Pima County Tax Parcel Combo and a record covenant regarding development and use of real property. Forms may be found at http://www.tucsonaz.gov/dsd/Forms_Fees___Maps/Applications/applications.html. If you have questions concerning this process please contact David Rivera at 791-5608. DS 2-05.2.4.A 11. Please add all existing zoning classifications on and adjacent to the property including across adjacent rights-of-way. (north C-1, south R-1, east R-3, and west O-3) DS 2-05.2.4.B 12. The minimum lane width leading to the drive through window is eleven (11) feet and must be clearly marked. No more than two car lengths may be less than the minimum width of eleven (11) feet. Please revise. DS 3-05.2.1.C.2.b 13. Please dimension the stacking spaces. The length of a stacking space is eighteen feet. DS 3-05.2.1.C.2.d 14. Please revise the parking detail for both standard and handicap parking to show the wheel stop curbing two and one half (2.5) feet from the front of the parking space. DS 3-05.2.3.C.2 15. Please provide a detail of handicap parking signage with verbiage as required by TDOT. The detail shall also indicate the height the sign will be posted which is required to be seven (7) feet. 16. Curb ramps shall be a minimum of three (3) feet in width, exclusive of flared sides. The curb ramp flares shall not be steeper than 1:10. Counter slopes of adjoining gutters and road surfaces immediately adjacent to the curb ramp shall not be steeper than 1:20. The adjacent surfaces at transitions at curb ramps to walks, gutters and streets shall be at the same level. Please verify with Engineering that the curb ramp at the north of the exit from the site onto Niven Avenue and connects to the pedestrian sidewalk leading into the site and the corner of Niven and Broadway meets this requirement. ANSI 406.2, 3, & 4 17. Detectable warnings (truncated domes) are required at marked crossings (crosswalks). All accessible curb ramps shall have truncated domes installed that shall be twenty-four (24) inches minimum in the direction of travel and extend the full width of the curb ramp or flush surface. The domes shall be located so the edge nearest the curb line is six (6) inches to eight (8) inches from the curb line. Please indicate that domes are being provided. ANSI 406.12, ANSI 705 18. Please revise general note 7. The note currently indicates the number of parking spaces as eighteen (18), yet the parking calculations and plan view on sheet 1 of 2 show the total number of spaces as seventeen (17). 19. The required setback for this use from adjacent R-3 zone is one and one half (1 1/2) the height of the proposed building wall from the property line (36 feet). Both plan view and cross section provided indicate the distance from the building to the property line as twenty-nine and one half (29.5) feet, not meeting the required setback of thirty-six (36) feet. Please revise. LUC 3.2.6.4 Perimeter Yard Width Matrix "DD" 20. Please dimension the proposed structure on the DP. DS 2-05.2.4.N 21. Please revise the off-street loading space length. The DP shows the length as thirty-two (32) feet. The require dimensions of the off-street loading space per LUC Table 3 (Sec. 3.4.5.3) is twelve (12) by thirty-five (35) feet. LUC 3.4.5.3 Table 3 22. Please add to general note 19 the maximum allowed FAR per the LUC (0.35). LUC 3.2.3.2.B 23. Please revise the bicycle parking calculations. The minimum number of required bicycle parking spaces is two (2), which can all be Class 2 when less than fifty (50) motor vehicle parking spaces are provided. Please revise general note 21 as well. LUC 3.3.3.5 & LUC 3.3.7.8.A 24. Please provide a dimensioned plan view detail for class 2 bicycle parking spaces. Be aware that that development standard 2-09 has been revised. Per DS 2-09.4.1 Class 2 bicycle parking facilities will be located no more than fifty (50) feet from the main building entrance(s) and will be along the front side of the building as well as along other sides of the building that has an entrance. The bicycle parking area will be separated from vehicular parking and drive areas by a barrier or sufficient distance to prevent damage to the bicycles (DS 2-09.4.3). Multiple rack bicycle parking require a minimum thirty (30) inches between outer spaces of posts or racks (DS 2-09.5.1.A) and provide a five (5) foot access aisle measured from the front or rear of the spaces. Please review the revised DS 2-09 and provide the necessary corrections to the bicycle parking as required. Once changes are provided and reviewed further comments may result. The revised DS may be found on the web at: http://www.tucsonaz.gov/dsd/Codes___Ordinances/DevStd209.pdf DS 2-05.2.4.Q 25. Please dimension the sidewalk from the edge of the space at the southwest corner of the building to the edge of the angled off-street loading space to assure that a minimum width of four (4) feet is being maintained. DS 2-08.5.1.A 26. Please provide dimensioned, color elevations of the proposed building to assist staff in determining compliance to rezoning condition 9. The elevation drawings are to be supplied to the Department of Urban Planning and Design to determine compliance. 27. Please indicate the location and type of postal service to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements. If mail is to be delivered to an area with a building please state so on the plan. DS 2-05.2.4.V 28. Indicate the locations and types of proposed signs (wall, freestanding, pedestal) to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements and that minimal locational requirements can be met. Also indicate if there are existing billboards on site. Billboards will be required to meet all LUC requirements as stated in LUC Sec. 3.5.4.26. If none exists please state so. DS 2-05.2.4.W & LUC 3.5.4.26 29. All changes, modifications, and/or corrections must be made on all applicable plans including the development plan, landscape plan, and NPPO. Once changes, modifications, and/or corrections are made and reviewed further comments may result. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Karol Aragonez, (520) 791-5550, ext. 1197. KAA S:\zoning review\karol\planning\cdrc\developmentplan\D06-0052dp.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development plan and additional requested documents. |
| 11/29/2006 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Revise the plans to comply with conditions of C9-06-17. Several conditions relate to landscaping, such as tree size and spacing, number of trees required, and decorative wall requirements. Provide a letter addressing specifically how each of the landscape related conditions are addressed. The plans currently do not comply with the conditions. 2) Revise the landscape plan such that plant materials located within SVT's consist of ground cover or low-growing vegetation of a species that will not grow higher than (30) inches. DW, LCA, NO & RP often exceed thirty inches in height and should be relocated. Trees may be planted within SVT's provided that: A) The trunk caliper, at maturity, will not exceed twelve (12) inches in diameter; B) The lowest branch of any tree is at least six (6) feet above the grade of the street (specify a standard trunk), and C) Trees are not planted in a line that could result in a solid wall effect when viewed from an angle. LUC 3.7.2.8 & DS 2-06 3) Revise the plans to provide screening along Niven Avenue. LUC Table 3.7.2-I 4) The required landscape borders do not meet the tree requirements of LUC 3.7.2.4 or the conditions of rezoning. Revise to add the required number of trees at the required spacing. 5) Revise the plans to provide the full ten-foot wide buffer required for the street landscape borders. The minimum width is ten feet, even at the intersection. Refuse storage and parking may not be located in the border. LUC 3.7.2.4. 6) Number the development plan sheets and reference any related case numbers on the landscape plan. 7) A minimum distance of two (2) feet must be maintained between a PAAL and any wall, screen, or other obstruction. DS 3-05.2.2.B.3 Revise the plans to comply where the thirty inch screen wall is adjacent to the PAAL. 8) Call out the proposed screening for the refuse storage area. LUC Table 3.7.2-I 9) The street landscape border coverage calculations require correction. Additional plants are required. Provide coverage for each type of plant if there is discrepancy. The plants shown on the plan will not provide the coverage indicated in the calculation within two years. DS 2-06.3.5.B 10) The area between the right-of-way line and sidewalk and the area between the sidewalk and the curb, if not covered with vegetation, shall be covered with an appropriate inorganic ground cover, such as decomposed granite. Revise the plans to clarify compliance. LUC 3.7.2.4.A.4 RESUBMITTAL OF ALL PLANS IS REQUIRED. The Native Plant Preservation application is approved. |
| 11/29/2006 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: D06-0052 WASHINGTON FEDERAL SAVINGS/DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE: November 29, 2006 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: In Title Block provide a brief legal description that includes Lots, Block, Subdivision, Book and Page. jg |
| 11/30/2006 | FRODRIG2 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Approved | Transportation Information for Rezoning, Subdivision, and Development Requests Delivered to: Date Delivered: City of Tucson - Development Services 11/30/2006 Case Number Project Name Average number of daily trips (ADT) forecasted as a result of the proposed development This information is provided for jurisdictional planning departments to assess the impact of the proposed residential or commercial development on surrounding traffic patterns and roads. If the forecasted daily traffic exceeds 500 average daily trips, a more detailed analysis is also provided. D06-0052 479 Washington Federal Savings Pima Association of Governments Sandra C. Holland, Data Services 177 N. Church Ave., Suite 405, Tucson, Arizona 85701-1127 (520) 792-1093 FAX (520) 620-6981 |
| 11/30/2006 | FRODRIG2 | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Denied | Provide the Real Estate Division with a legal description for the additional two feet of right of way to be dedicated and a title report dated within 30 days of the subject parcels. Please mail these items directly to the Real Estate Division at 201 N. Stone Ave., 6th Floor, Tucson, AZ 85701 Attn: Jim Stoyanoff |
| 12/04/2006 | JCLARK3 | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Denied | * No known landfill within 1000 feet of this development. * Dumpster enclosure requires 10' clear between the sidewalls protection and between the rear wall protection and the gates. |
| 12/05/2006 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 12/05/2006 | PATRICIA GILBERT | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | TO: Patricia Gehlen; CDRC Coordinator DATE: December 5, 2006 SUBJECT: Engineering review of the Development Plan. The activity number is D06-0052. SUMMARY: The Washington Federal Savings Development Plan and Drainage Report were received by Engineering on November 8th, 2006. Engineering has reviewed the received items and does not recommend approval of the Development Plan or the Drainage Report. RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: DEVELOPMENT PLAN, DRAINAGE REPORT GENERAL COMMENTS 1. The Drainage Report was reviewed for Development Plan purposes only. 2. A Grading Plan and Permit may be required. 3. Proposed fills in excess of two feet above existing grade at any location in the outer one hundred feet of the developing site adjacent to residentially zoned property require the procedure outlined in Development Standards 11-01.8.1. This process must be complete prior to Grading Plan approval. 4. A floodplain use permit may be required. The next submittal must address the following items: DEVELOPMENT PLAN 1. The specific maintenance notes specified in the Standards Manual for Drainage Design and Floodplain Management, SMDDFM, 14.3 must be included on the Development Plan. 2. Place a note on the plan, "All roof downspouts shall be routed under any adjacent sidewalk". Sidewalks must be flood free for up to the ten year event. DS 2-08.4.1.E. 3. Provide a location map which meets the minimum requirements of D.S. 2-05.2.1.D, show the subject property approximately centered in the one (1) square mile area, identify conditions within the square mile area, such as major streets and watercourses, section, township and range, north arrow and scale. 4. The assigned case number for this project is D06-0052, provide this case number on all sheets of the development plan in the lower right hand corner of each sheet. DS 2-05.2.1.K. 5. Provide estimated cut and fill quantities on the development plan. DS 2-02.2.1.A.17. 6. The drainage report provides discussion of over 100 cfs within Niven Avenue. The drainage report has not provided delineation of this flood hazard area. This will be requested in the drainage report comments. Because this project may be impacted by regulatory flow, the notes found in DS 2-05.2.2.C.2. may apply. If these notes are applicable provide the appropriate revision. 7. In addition to the above comment the provisions of DS 2-05.2.3.I. may apply. At minimum the delineation of the flood hazard area must be shown on the plan. Revise the plan to show delineation of the flood hazard area. DS 2-05.2.4.H.6. 8. All easements shall be drawn on the plan. The recordation information, location, width, and purpose of all easements on site will be stated. Blanket easements should be listed in the notes, together with recordation data and their proposed status. Should an easement not be in use and be proposed for vacation or have been abandoned, so indicate. However, should the easement be in conflict with any proposed building location, vacation of the easement is to occur prior to issuance of permits. If applicable provide the required existing easement information on the plan. DS 2-05.2.3.B. 9. If applicable show on the plan any existing storm drainage facilities. DS 2-05.2.3.F. 10. Provide the recordation data for Broadway Blvd and Niven Avenue. DS 2-05.2.3.C. 11. The 2' of ROW that is to be dedicated in effort to meet Rezoning Condition number 2 must be recorded prior to approval of this review. Provide the docket and page of the recordation and remove the verbiage, "by separate instrument." 12. Indicate if the 75' ½ ROW dimension for Broadway Blvd is existing, future or coincident. If the 75' ½ ROW dimension is existing and future label as such. DS 2-02.2.3.C. 13. Dimension from the street centerline of Broadway Blvd to the future curb location. The future curb location is 12' from the future ROW line. Revise. 14. It appears the 6' future sidewalk is not in the correct location. Once the future curb location is shown on the plan verify the future sidewalk location. 3' is required between the back of curb and front of sidewalk. Revise if necessary. 15. Provide a dimension for the pavement width for the ½ ROW of Broadway Blvd (excluding the frontage road). 16. Indicate the corner of the frontage road off of Niven Avenue and Broadway Blvd. It is not clear on the plan view how the frontage road ties in with Niven Avenue. Revise as necessary. 17. Be aware the Department of Transportation prefers the entire 6' sidewalk to be new. If 2' is added to the 4' of sidewalk, the integrity of the concrete is minimized. Indicate on the development plan the entire 6' sidewalk will be new (proposed) 18. Demonstrate how the vehicle (truck) utilizing the loading space is going to maneuver out of the project? It appears the vehicle can access to the loading space but can not maneuver out of the space. Demonstrate on the plan view vehicle maneuverability to and from the loading space. DS 2-05.2.4.O. 19. All proposed easements (utility, drainage, access, etc.) are to be dimensioned and labeled as to their purposes and whether they will be public or private. Revise the plan if this standard is applicable. DS 2-05.2.4.G. 20. Indicate proposed ground elevations at different points or provide a preliminary grading plan to reference to future grading and site drainage. DS 2-05.2.4.H.4. 21. Show the direction of drainage on the roof of the structure. DS 2-05.2.4.H.2. 22. Grading, hydrology, landscape islands and borders are to be integrated in effort to make maximum use of stormwater runoff for supplemental irrigation purposes. Landscape islands and borders must provide water harvesting from the vehicle use area and the rooftops. Small curb opening must be provided to accept the surface stormwater. Revise the site plan to meet this criteria. LUC 3.7.4.3.B. 23. Dimension sidewalk between the parking space and the PAAL located at the southwest corner of the building. DS 2-05.2.4.K. 24. Two feet of the 8' block wall located on the south property line is located within the far side sight visibility triangle (SVT). Revise the plan to show the wall outside the far side SVT. 25. Provide 18' curb returns for the ingress/egress to Niven Avenue. TAMG 5.4. 26. Cross section BB shows the space between the PAAL and the new ROW line at a 8.5' width. This space is the required 10' street landscape border. Revise the cross section to provide a 10' dimension and label this space as the street landscape border. 27. The solid waste enclosure is encroaching into the required 10' street landscape border. Revise the plan to show the solid waste enclosure outside the 10' street landscape border. 28. Please note that subsequent comments may be necessary upon resubmittal, depending on the nature and extent of revisions that occur to the plans. DRAINAGE REPORT 1.Delineate the limits of the area containing the regulatory flood plain on an appropriate plan in the report. This information must also be provided on the development plan. SMDDFM 2.3.1.4.C.1. |
| 12/07/2006 | PGEHLEN1 | TUCSON WATER NEW AREA DEVELOPMENT | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 12/07/2006 | ED ABRIGO | PIMA COUNTY | ASSESSOR | Passed | |
| 12/11/2006 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | DATE: December 08, 2006 TO: Ferne Rodriguez, Development Services FROM: Glenn Hicks Parks and Recreation 791-4873 ext. 215 Glenn.Hicks@tucsonaz.gov CC: Patricia Gehlen SUBJECT: D06-0052 Washington Federal Savings: Development Plan Staff has no comments. |
| 12/14/2006 | TIM ROWE | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | December 14, 2006 TO: Antony C. Tsang, P.E. A.C. Tsang Engineering Group, Inc. THRU: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager City of Tucson, Development Services Department FROM: Chandubhai C. Patel, P.E. Pima County Development Services Department Development Review Division (Wastewater) SUBJECT: Washington Federal Savings Development Plan – 1st Submittal D06-052 The proposed sewer collection lines to serve the above-referenced development have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ), and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. ALL SHEETS. Add the project number, D06-052 to the title block of each sheet. This number should be shown larger or bolder than any cross-reference numbers. Provide a letter from PCWMD Development Services, written within the past 90 days, stating that the treatment and conveyance system capacity for this project is available. A capacity request form may be found at http://www.pima.gov/wwm/forms/docs/CapResponseRequest.pdf SHEET 1.Show a line symbol for the New Private Sewer Line in the LEGEND. SHEET 1. In the LEGEND, call out the EXISTING SEWER LINE as EXISTING PUBLIC SEWER LINE. SHEET 1. Show the six digit Pima County manhole numbers for the existing public manholes in the Alley, located immediately upstream and downstream of the planned connection point of the new sewer line. Also, show the invert elevation of the upstream manhole. SHEET 1. Show the Pima County plan number for the existing sewer with the size and slope of the sewer line. SHEET 1. Show the existing public sewer line in the Niven Avenue and show its Pima County plan number. SHEET 1. Show the recordation information, book and page number, by which the 20 –foot Alley was created. SHEET 1. Show the invert elevation of the 4-inch BCS where it connects to the existing sewer line. . We will require a revised set of drawings and a response letter addressing each comment. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. The next submittal of this project will be the 2nd submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $50.00 made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER must accompany the revised set of bluelines and the response letter. For any questions regarding the fee schedule, please go to http://www.pimaxpress.com/SubDivision/Documents/Fees.PDF where you may find the appropriate wastewater review fees at the bottom of page 1. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. If you have any questions regarding the above comments, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Chandubhai C. Patel, P.E. Telephone: (520) 740-6563 Copy: Project file |
| 12/19/2006 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES December 19, 2006 Antony C. Tsang A.C. Tsang Engineering Group, Inc. 4626 East Fort Lowell, suite S Tucson, Arizona 85712 Subject: D06-0052 Washington Federal Savings Development Plan Dear Tony: Your submittal of November 8, 2006 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 10 Copies Revised Development Plan (Traffic, Zoning, Addressing, Landscape, Real Estate, ESD, Engineering, Wastewater, DUPD, DSD) 5 Copies Revised Landscape Plan (Zoning, Landscape, Engineering, DUPD, DSD) 2 Copies Revised Drainage Report (Engineering, DSD) 2 Copies Recorded Lot Combo Form (Zoning, DSD) 3 Copies Color Elevations (Zoning, DUPD, DSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 791-5608 extension 1179. Sincerely, Patricia Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 325-0979 dp-resubmittal |
| 12/19/2006 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Denied | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT D06-0052 Washington Federal Savings 12/18/06 () Tentative Plat (XXXX) Development Plan (XXXX) Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other CROSS REFERENCE: C9-06-17 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Broadway – Craycroft Area Plan GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: COMMENTS DUE BY: 12/06/06 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment () Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies () See Additional Comments Attached () No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: (XXXX) Resubmittal Required: () Tentative Plat (XXXX) Development Plan (XXXX) Landscape Plan (XXXX) Other – Elevations and Color pallet REVIEWER: D.R. Corral for (MSP) 791-4505 DATE: 12/11/06 Per rezoning condition #9 which states “the proposed structure shall be designed with the same attention to architectural detail on the front, side and rear facades. Design elements shall include a variety of rooflines and color pallet reflecting natural desert shades.” Please submit elevations and color pallets to reflect how you will comply with this condition Per rezoning condition #8 which states “the owner/developer shall provide a landscape buffer that includes 24-inch box canopy trees, planted 25-feet on center, along the full length of the southern and eastern property boundaries. The landscape buffer shall include understory shrubs and groundcover plantings.” Based on the landscape plans, the trees appear to be spaced out every 30 feet from center for the southern and eastern property boundaries. Please submit a revised landscape plan showing trees spaced 25-feet on center for the southern and eastern property boundaries. Per rezoning condition #11 which states “All walls visible from a public right-of-way and/or adjacent to existing residential development, are to be graffiti-resistant and incorporate one (1) or more visually appealing design treatments, such as the use of two (2) or more decorative materials like stucco, tile, stone, or brick; a visually interesting design on the wall surface, varied wall alignments (jog, curve, notch, setback, etc.); and/or trees and shrubs in voids created by the wall variations. Please submit an elevation to reflect how this condition will be met. |