Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - CORE REVIEW
Permit Number - D06-0050
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - CORE REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08/21/2008 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 08/22/2008 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC SITE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 08/22/2008 | PAUL MACHADO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 08/26/2008 | TERRY STEVENS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Terry Stevens Lead Planner PROJECT: D06-0050 5151 E. Broadway Blvd. Revision TRANSMITTAL: 08/26/2008 DUE DATE: 09/05/08 COMMENTS: 1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is 06/11/09. 2. DS 2-05.2.2.B.3 Clearly indicate on the foot print of the building the food services (restaurant) area and any expansions of this area. Provide expansion calculations. This includes any pervious expansions. If the total expansion exceeds 25% then full code compliance will be required for the entire site. 3. DS 2-05.2.4.Q In the bicycle parking calculations combine the new admin. offices together and provide the number of required class one and class two bicycle parking spaces based on LUC 3.3.4 requiring 75% class one and 25% class two bicycle parking spaces. In the bicycle parking calculations for the restaurant use provide the number of required class one and class two bicycle parking spaces as per LUC 3.3.4 requiring 50% class one and 50% class two bicycle parking spaces. Please provide a dimensioned detail for class 1 bicycle parking enclosures. Be aware that that development standard 2-09 has been revised Please provide a plan view detail of the proposed class 2 bicycle parking spaces. Single rack spaces placed in a row will allow a minimum of seventy -two (72) inch length per bicycle parking space and a minimum of thirty (30) inches between outer spaces of racks. A five (5) foot wide access aisle measured from the front or rear of the seventy-two (72) inch long parking space will be provided beside each row. Lighting will be provided such that all facilities are thoroughly illuminated and visible from adjacent sidewalks, parking lots, or buildings, during working hours. The surface of the facility can be surfaced the same as for motor vehicle parking or with a minimum of one (1) inch thickness of one-fourth (1/4) inch aggregate material. DS 2-09.5.1, DS2-09.5.2, DS 2-09.5.4, & DS 2-09.6.2 Bicycle parking provided on the DP does not meet the requirements of revised DS (Development Standard) 2-09. Per DS 2-09.4.1 Class 2 bicycle parking facilities will be located no more than fifty (50) feet from the main building entrance(s) and will be along the front side of the building as well as along other sides of the building that has an entrance. Space the class one and class two bicycle parking spaces through out the site. 4. Additional comments maybe forth coming based on changes to the plan and responses to the above comments. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Terry Stevens, (520) 837-4961 TLS C:\planning\cdrc\developmentplan\D06-0050-2dp.doc |
| 08/26/2008 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 08/26/2008 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Plant materials located within SVT's should consist of ground cover or low-growing vegetation of a species that will not grow higher than (30) inches. However, trees may be planted within SVT's provided that: A) The trunk caliper, at maturity, will not exceed twelve (12) inches in diameter; B) The lowest branch of any tree is at least six (6) feet above the grade of the street, and C) Trees are not planted in a line that could result in a solid wall effect when viewed from an angle. LUC 3.7.2.8 & DS 2-06 Some of the plants proposed within the SVT's, such as bear grass and red yucca may grow considerably higher than 30 inches. Revise landscape plan. 2. Revise the Development and Landscape Plans for consistency regarding the location and number of proposed loading areas. DS 2-07.2.1.A 3. Revise the Development and Landscape Plans to provide screening for all loading areas, including the northernmost loading area per LUC Table 3.7.2-I. |
| 08/27/2008 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Approv-Cond | August 27, 2008 To: John Lupo, P.E. Castro Engineering Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department _____________________________________________________ From: Tom Porter, Sr. CEA (520-740-6579), representing the Pima County Departments of Wastewater Management and Environmental Quality Subject: Pavilions at 5151 E Broadway Blvd Development Plan – 7th Submittal D06-0050 The drawings for the proposed Development Plan for the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. The Pima County Department of Environmental Quality and Wastewater Management Department hereby approve the above referenced submittal of the development plan as submitted. Please note the following: Approval of the above referenced submittal does not authorize the construction of public or private sewer collection lines, or water distribution lines. Prior to the construction of such features, a Construction Authorization (Approval To Construct) may need to be obtained from the Pima County Environmental Quality. Also, air quality activity permits must be secured by the developer or prime contractor from the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality before constructing, operating or engaging in an activity which may cause or contribute to air pollution. On Sheet 3 remove the reference to a new public manhole #1. |
| 09/09/2008 | ANDY VERA | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 09/10/2008 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES September 10, 2008 Andrew Rob Paulus Architect Ltd. 116 East Congress Street Tucson, Arizona 85701 Subject: D06-0050 The Pavilions Revised Development Plan Dear John: Your submittal of August 21, 2008 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 3 Copies Revised Development Plan (Landscape, Zoning, DSD) 3 Copies Revised Landscape Plan (Landscape, Zoning, DSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4919. Sincerely, Patricia Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 293-2115 dp-resubmittal |