Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: CORE REVIEW
Permit Number - D06-0050
Review Name: CORE REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06/11/2008 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 06/12/2008 | FRODRIG2 | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | >>> "Chandubhai Patel" <Chandubhai.Patel@dsd.pima.gov> 06/11/2008 4:15 PM >>> Goeff, Patricia's email talks about the plan set . This is what I just reviewed and it talks about the new sewers. So, you need to make another submittal and pay $39 Here is what you should do: -Delete note # 9. -Delete Note # 13 - Add a note that says all sewers are existing. No new sewerslines are proposed. If this is done, we will be able to send you an approval letter. C.C. Patel |
| 06/12/2008 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Denied | Fire hydrants were not shown. Keynote 4. |
| 06/13/2008 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC SITE | REVIEW | Denied | 13 JUNE 2008 D06-0050/PAVILIONS, CORE REVIEW REVIEWED BY RON BROWN ACCESSIBLE REVIEW 2006 IBC/ICC 117.1 DENIED: SEE COMMENTS BELOW I. SHEET 1 AND 2 of 4 A. DENOTE GOVERNING ACCESSIBILITY CODE; 2006 IBC/ICC 117.1 FOR PRIVATE PROPERTY, SECTIONS 405 AND 406 IS FOR PRIVATE PROPERTY CURB AND SIDE WALK RAMPS. MAKE ALL NECESSARY REFERENCE NOTE CHANGES TO THAT EFFECT. PROVIDE LARGE SCALE DETAILS OF ALL DIFFERENT TYPES OF RAMPS. B. DENOTE RIGHT OF WAY ACCESSIBILITY STANDARDS; COT DOT STANDARDS FOR CURB RAMPS AT DRIVE WAYS. STANDARD DETAIL 207 IS FOR R.O.W. RAMPS ONLY. MAKE ALL NECESSARY REFERENCE NOTES TO THAT EFFECT. PROVIDE LARGE SCALE DETAILS OF ALL DIFFERENT TYPES OF RAMPS. C. NOTE STATES THAT THERE ARE 24 ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES PROVIDED, ALL SPACES NOT SHOWN. D. PROVIDE AND IDENTIFY ACCESSIBLE ROUTE THROUGHOUT SITE TO ALL BUILDING ENTRANCES AND EXITS AND PARKING FACILITIES AND TO NEAREST PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION POINT AS PER ICC 117.1, SECTION 402 1. SHOW LOCATION OF NEAREST PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION DROP OFF POINT. 2. PROVIDE SPOT GRADES THROUGH OUT ACCESSIBLE ROUTE FINISHED SURFACES TO SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SLOPES AS REQUIRED BY ICC 117.1, SECTION 403.3 3. SHOW AND PROVIDE ACCESSIBLE ROUTE CONNECTION TO PUBLIC R.O.W. PEDESTRIAN WAY. a. EXTEND CONCRETE ACCESSIBLE ROUTE AT THE ROSEMONT BLVD ENTRANCE TO PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY CONCRETE WALK WAY. 4. MAKE CONNECTION FROM NEW CONCRETE ACCESSIBLE ROUTE ON EAST SIDE OF EXISTING BUILDING TO THE NEW CONCRETE ACCESSIBLE ROUTE ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THE EXISTING BUILDING, CLOSE THE LOOP. E. VERIFY ACCESSIBILITY TO ALL BUILDING ENTRANCES AS REQUIRED PER 2006 IBC SECTION 1105 AND ICC 117.1, SECTIONS 302 AND 303. F. DETAIL D: 1. EXTEND CURB TO EDGE OF AISLE, REDUCE WIDE OF DETECTABLE WARNINGS TO THAT OF THE AISLE, PUSH RAMPS ON EITHER SIDE TO BOTTOM OUT AT EDGE OF AISLE, 2. PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF 4' ACCESSIBLE ROUTE BEHIND 2' WIDTH OF DETECTABLE WARNINGS. G. DETAIL E: RELOCATE SIGNAGE JUST TO THE EDGE OF THE ACCESSIBLE ROUTE AND DENOTE DETECTABLE WARNINGS AS PER ANSI 117.1, SECTION 705.5 NOT SECTION 406-18, NO SUCH SECTION. H. II. SHEET 3 OF 4 A. ALL NOTES FROM ITEM "I" ARE APPLICABLE B. ACCESSIBLE PARKING: a. IDENTIFY "VAN ACCESSIBLE" PARKING SPACES AS PER 2006 IBC, SECTION 1106.5; ICC 117.1, SECTION 503. LARGE SCALE DETAILS NEED TO SHOW ACCESSIBLE ROUTE AND GRADE SLOPES AND SIGN LOCATIONS ON SITE PLAN. b. SURFACE SLOPES FOR ALL ACCESSIBLE PARKING AREAS TO BE NO GREATER THAN 1:48, ICC 117.1, SECTION 502.5. PROVIDE SPOT GRADES REFLECTING COMPLIANCE. c. CLARIFY HOW ACCESS IS ACHIEVED FROM THE TWO ACCESSIBLE SPACES TO THE CONCRETE ACCESSIBLE ROUTE. d. CLARIFY CONNECTION OF EXISTING ACCESSIBLE SPACE LOCATED IN THE SOUTH EAST CORNER TO ACCESSIBLE ROUTE. e. CLARIFY HOW EXISTING MARKED CROSSING FROM THE FOUR EXISTING CONNECTED ACCESSIBLE SPACES IS MODIFIED TO CONNECT TO NEW CONCRETE ACCESSIBLE ROUTE AND BOLLARD ROW. DETAIL ALL RAMPS AND DETECTABLE WARNINGS REQUIRED. C. CLARIFY DOT CURB RAMP AT CORNER OF ROSEMONT AND BROADWAY D. CLARIFY DOT CURB RAMPS AT SITE ENTRANCE FROM ROSEMONT. E. CLARIFY LOADING ZONES AS PASSENGER OR MATERIAL. IF THEY ARE PASSENGER LOADING ZONES, THEY MUST MEET 2006 IBC, SECTION 1106.7 AND ICC, SECTION 503; INCLUDES PARKING SPACE PLUS 5' ACCESS AISLE. III. SHEET 4 OF 4 A. ALL NOTES FROM "I" ARE APPLICABLE B. ACCESSIBLE ISLAND CROSSING AT BROADWAY BLVD ENTRANCE TO MEET DOT 207 STANDARDS PLUS DETECTABLE WARNINGS. C. PROVIDE DETAILED PLAN LAYOUT OF BROADWAY FRONT ENTRANCE PARKING. PROVIDE ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES AS REQUIRED WITH ACCESS RAMPS TO ACCESSIBLE ROUTE. D. SHOW ACCESSIBLE PARKING ACCOMMODATIONS ON EAST SIDE PARKING. E. CLARIFY LOADING ZONES AS PASSENGER OR MATERIAL. IF THEY ARE PASSENGER LOADING ZONES, THEY MUST MEET 2006 IBC, SECTION 1106.7 AND ICC, SECTION 503; INCLUDES PARKING SPACE PLUS 5' ACCESS AISLE. F. MAKE CONNECTION FROM NEW CONCRETE ACCESSIBLE ROUTE ON EAST SIDE OF EXISTING BUILDING TO THE NEW CONCRETE ACCESSIBLE ROUTE ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THE EXISTING BUILDING, CLOSE THE LOOP. G. CLARIFY HOW EXISTING MARKED CROSSING FROM THE SIX EXISTING CONNECTED ACCESSIBLE SPACES IS MODIFIED TO CONNECT TO NEW CONCRETE ACCESSIBLE ROUTE. DETAIL ALL RAMPS AND DETECTABLE WARNINGS REQUIRED. IV. GENERAL F. ALL ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES, PRIVATE PROPERTY SIDE WALK RAMPS AND CURB RAMPS AND RAISED MARKED CROSSINGS TO MEET 2006 IBC/ICC 117.1 ACCESSIBLE STANDARDS, SECTION 405 AND 406. PROVIDE LARGE SCALE DETAILS OF EACH DIFFERENT TYPE SHOWING SIZE OF SPACE AND ISLE, SIGNAGE, ACCESSIBLE ROUTE AND GRADE SLOPES. PROVIDE DETECTABLE WARNINGS AS PER SECTION 406.2. SHOW ALL DETAILS SPECIFIC TO SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN LAYOUT, NOT A-TYPICAL PLAN LAYOUTS. END OF REVIEW |
| 06/18/2008 | ANDY VERA | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Denied | 1. No provisions shown or mentioned for solid waste collection services. Clarify existing or proposed conditions/services within DP. 2. Provide detail of enclosure area/s. If required to meet full code compliance then refer to DS 6-01.3.0 & 6-01.4.0. Please provide corrections on resubmittal. If you have any questions you may contact Andy Vera at (520) 791-5543 ext 1212 or e-mail: Andy.Vera@tucsonaz.gov |
| 06/19/2008 | PAUL MACHADO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | To: Patricia Gehlen DATE: June 19, 2008 CDRC/Zoning Manager SUBJECT: 5151 E. Broadway Blvd. Development Plan D06-0050 (First Revision Rev.) T14S, R14E, Section 11 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Development Plan and Drainage Statement. The Development Plan (DP) and Drainage Statement (DS) cannot be approved as submitted. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal. Development Plan: 1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the DP. 2. Driveway Locations per the Transportation Access Management Guidelines for the City of Tucson Chap. 5.4 Design requirements for driveway locations onto arterial and collector roadways in all new development are as follows: 1) Entrance and exit drives crossing arterials and collectors are limited to two per three hundred feet of frontage along any major roadway. The nearest pavement edges spaced at least eighty feet apart. 2) A minimum of one hundred and fifty feet, measured at curbline, shall separate the nearest pavement edge of any entrance or exit driveway and the curbline to any signalized intersection with arterial and collector roadways. 3. The preferred curb radii will depend on the type of vehicles to be accommodated, the number of pedestrians crossing the access road, and the operating speed of the accessed roadway. Table 5-2 presents the minimum curb return radius for connection between two-types of streets, i.e. the minimum curb return for an arterial street to an arterial street is 30-feet. Driveway Curb Radius per the Transportation Access Management Guidelines for the City of Tucson Chap. 5.5. Show a new curb return at the West side of the NW ingress/egress point. 4. Please provide property description per D.S. 2-02.2.1.3. 5. Please label lot dimensions and bearings per D.S. 2-02.2.1.5 6. Grade the new parking areas to drain into the water harvesting areas prior to discharging onto the street. Typical for all planters and depressed areas for water harvesting. 7. Provide depressed curbs for storm water in enter the depressed areas for water harvesting. 8. Grade breaks at the ingress/egress points may be necessary in order to achieve proper water harvesting techniques. 9. Label existing and future sight visibility triangles per D.S. 2-02.2.1.10. The future location of the face of curb/edge of pavement is 12' from the right-of-way/property line. Show the future SVTs at all egress/ingress points. Show the exist. and future SVT at the corner of Broadway Blvd. and Rosemont Blvd. also. 10. Show all points of egress and ingress including locations and width of driveways and parking area access lanes (P.A.A.L.) per D.S. 2-02.2.1.11. The "driveway turn around" at the front of the building does not meet min. radii requirements. Revise as required. 11. Please label all vehicular, bicycle, pedestrian, and handicapped circulation clearly identified per D.S. 2-02.2.1.12. It appears that a stairway at the NW pedestrian access point in not handicap accessible. The pedestrian route must be handicap accessible. Revise as required. 12. Please list estimated cut & fill quantities per D.S. 2-02.2.1.17. 13. Dimension from street monument lines to existing and proposed curbs, sidewalks, driveways, and utility lines per D.S. 2-02.2.1.21. 14. Show all fences, walls, or vegetation for screening and sight visibility by type, material, height, location and spacing per D.S. 2-02.2.1.27. 15. A permit or a private improvement agreement will be necessary for any work performed within the Right-of-way. Contact Permits and Codes at (520) 791-5100 for permit information. 16. Please show a typical cross section of the P.A.A.L. or call out the percentage of slopes. Call out the GB at the D/W, if applicable. 17. Please show the proposed roof drainage patterns, 100% of the 10-year flow must be conveyed under the sidewalks including any other site drainage as well. Please provide supporting calculations to demonstrate compliance with D.S. 3-01.4.4. If the location(s) of the roof scuppers have not yet been decided, a general note indicating sidewalk scuppers will be used when the roof scuppers locations have been designed and located will suffice. 18. List the consulting engineer and the owner/developer on the plans with the pertinent information. Drainage Statement: 1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the DR. 2. This review was performed for DP purposes only. 3. Grade the new parking areas to drain into the water harvesting areas prior to discharging onto the street. Typical for all planters and depressed areas for water harvesting. 4. Provide depressed curbs for storm water in enter the depressed areas for water harvesting. 5. Grade breaks at the ingress/egress points may be necessary in order to achieve proper water harvesting techniques. 6. Address the storm water harvesting techniques in the DS. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 837-4932 or Paul.Machado@ci.tucsonaz.govs Paul P. Machado Senior Engineering Associate City of Tucson/Development Services Department 201 N. Stone Avenue P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210 (520) 837-4932 office (520) 879-8010 fax C:/5151 E. Broadway Blvd._DP |
| 06/19/2008 | JOSE ORTIZ | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | |
| 06/24/2008 | TERRY STEVENS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Terry Stevens Lead Planner PROJECT: D06-0050 5151 E. Broadway Blvd. Revision TRANSMITTAL: 06/24/2008 DUE DATE: 6/25/08 COMMENTS: 1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is 06/11/09. 2. DS 2-05.2.4.A Provide the entire lot on the plan with dimensions and bearings for all lot lines. 3. DS 2-05.2.4.B Provide the adjacent zoning of the property located to the north of this project. 4. DS 2-05.2.4.D.3 Clearly indicate the required 24' with of the PAAL behind the perpendicular parking spaces located along the south property line between the two buildings (auto court). Clearly indicate the direction of travel for the one-way PAALs at the auto court area on the plan. East of the entrance from Rosemont is noted "existing columns to remain". Clearly indicate the width of the PAAL between the columns and how the PAAL will continue the required 24' width. 5. DS 2-05.2.2.B.3 Per attached letter, there is no longer going to be restaurant space and the calculations where to be changed. The indicated use include food services. Revise or clarify. Clearly indicate on the foot print of the building the food services (restaurant) area and any expansions of this area. If applicable. Clearly indicate, on the plan, the existing building and the areas of expansion for each use. Provide expansion calculations. This includes any pervious expansions. If the total expansion exceeds 25% then full code compliance will be required for the entire site. 6. DS 2-05.2.4.K Clearly indicate if the are any door openings along the south and west side of the expansion to the existing building on sheet #3. If there are any openings pedestrian circulation path (sidewalk) will be required. Clearly indicate the minimum sidewalk width along the north side of the building on sheet #3. The indicated 2'-6" sidewalk does not meet the minimum required clear width of 4'. If wheel stops are not provided in the adjacent parking spaces the minimum width of the sidewalk is 6'-6". If wheel stops are provided clearly indicate the location on each parking space on the site plan. Revise. The above comment applies also to the parking spaces and sidewalk along the east side and the north east corner of the building on sheet #4. Clearly indicate the location and width of the sidewalk for these areas. Provide dimensions of the sidewalks near the landscape area along the east side of the building on sheet #4. Provide pedestrian circulation path (sidewalk) to the required bicycle parking spaces. Provide pedestrian circulation path to all new trash enclosures. The trash enclosures were shown on the last approved development plan but are not indicated on this plan. Clarify. 7. DS 2-05.2.4.M Provide, as a note, the square footage of each commercial structure and the specific use proposed. The total square footage in the FAR calculations does not match the square footage in the parking calculations. Calrify. In the FAR calculations provide the proposed FAR as well as the allowed. 8. DS 2-05.2.4.N On the drawing, show locations and footprints of all structures. Label height and dimensions. 9. DS 2-02.2.4.O In the loading zone calculations clearly indicate the number of required loading zones as well as the number of provided loading zones. Clearly indicate maneuverability for the loading zones located along the west property line. If two of the spaces are full how will the third truck be able to maneuver in and out of the loading zone. See engineering comments. 10. DS 2-05.2.4.P Provide plans indicating all motor vehicle parking spaces provided for the entire site. Provide wheel stops at all required parking spaces to prevent overhanging of sidewalks (limiting the width to less than 4'), landscape areas, or to prevent damage to buildings. In the "auto court" clearly indicate the location of the parking spaces. It appears to have been a drafting error concerning line weight for the spaces. In the parking calculations for the restaurant, separate the existing from the new expansion in square footage and required parking. Clearly indicate the location of all provided and required handicap parking spaces. 11. DS 2-05.2.4.Q In the bicycle parking calculations combine the new admin. offices together and provide the number of required class one and class two bicycle parking spaces based on LUC 3.3.4 requiring 75% class one and 25% class two bicycle parking spaces. In the bicycle parking calculations for the restaurant use provide the number of required class one and class two bicycle parking spaces as per LUC 3.3.4 requiring 50% class one and 50% class two bicycle parking spaces. Provide locations of the class one bicycle parking spaces. Please provide a dimensioned detail for class 1 bicycle parking enclosures. Be aware that that development standard 2-09 has been revised Please provide a plan view detail of the proposed class 2 bicycle parking spaces. Single rack spaces placed in a row will allow a minimum of seventy -two (72) inch length per bicycle parking space and a minimum of thirty (30) inches between outer spaces of racks. A five (5) foot wide access aisle measured from the front or rear of the seventy-two (72) inch long parking space will be provided beside each row. Lighting will be provided such that all facilities are thoroughly illuminated and visible from adjacent sidewalks, parking lots, or buildings, during working hours. The surface of the facility can be surfaced the same as for motor vehicle parking or with a minimum of one (1) inch thickness of one-fourth (1/4) inch aggregate material. DS 2-09.5.1, DS2-09.5.2, DS 2-09.5.4, & DS 2-09.6.2 Bicycle parking provided on the DP does not meet the requirements of revised DS (Development Standard) 2-09. Per DS 2-09.4.1 Class 2 bicycle parking facilities will be located no more than fifty (50) feet from the main building entrance(s) and will be along the front side of the building as well as along other sides of the building that has an entrance. Space the class one and class two bicycle parking spaces through out the site. 12. DS 2-05.2.4.R Provide future and existing sight visibility triangles for all entrances from the streets into the property. See engineering comments. 13. DS 2-05.2.4.T Provide location of the refuse collection containers. See engineering comments. 14. DS 2-05.2.4.V Please indicate the location and type of postal service to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements. If mail is to be delivered to an area within a building please state so on the plan. 15. Additional comments maybe forth coming based on changes to the plan and responses to the above comments. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Terry Stevens, (520) 837-4961 TLS C:\planning\cdrc\developmentplan\D06-0050dp.doc |
| 06/24/2008 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Submit the previously approved Development and Landscape Plans. 2) Revise the Development and Landscape Plans to provide details for the planting space indicated west of the parking structure. Areas where plants are susceptible to injury by vehicular or pedestrian traffic must be protected by appropriate means, such as curbs, bollards, or low walls per LUC 3.7.2.3.B. 3) Rain water harvesting must be conducted at this site per the requirements in Land Use Code (LUC) Section 3.7.1.1.A, requiring that landscaping should accomplish natural resources conservation; LUC Section 3.7.4.3.B requiring integration of grading, hydrology and landscaping to make the maximum use of stormwater for on-site irrigation; and LUC Section 3.7.4.5.B requiring that stormwater and runoff harvesting be used to supplement drip irrigation for both new and preserved vegetation. Techniques to design and implement water harvesting are described in the City of Tucson's Water Harvesting Guidance Manual. This document can be downloaded as from the following website: http://dot.tucsonaz.gov/stormwater/ To comply with the above-referenced LUC sections, rain water harvested from building roofs, sidewalks, and parking lots shall be employed to assist in supporting landscaped areas including parking lot tree wells, landscape buffers, sidewalk plantings, and other vegetation locations at the site. Details and Specifications for water harvesting shall be clearly indicated on site plans to ensure it is correctly implemented at all necessary stages of construction. The City of Tucson's Office of Conservation and Sustainable Development is available for consultation regarding water harvesting principles, techniques and code requirements. Please contact Ann Audrey or Frank Sousa in OCSD to make an appointment. 4) Show required sight visibility triangles on the landscape plan. Plant materials located within SVT's should consist of ground cover or low-growing vegetation of a species that will not grow higher than (30) inches. However, trees may be planted within SVT's provided that: A) The trunk caliper, at maturity, will not exceed twelve (12) inches in diameter; B) The lowest branch of any tree is at least six (6) feet above the grade of the street, and C) Trees are not planted in a line that could result in a solid wall effect when viewed from an angle. LUC 3.7.2.8 & DS 2-06 5) Revise the landscape plan to provide the square footage of the oasis allowance area and calculation. DS 2-07.2.2.A.2.b Except as otherwise provided in the LUC, all plant material used for landscaping shall be selected from the ADWR Low Water Use/Drought Tolerant Plant List per LUC 3.7.2.2.A http://www.azwater.gov/dwr/Content/Find_by_Program/Drought_and_Conservation/LowWaterPlantLists/TucsonAMA/2007_Plant_List_apha_botanical.pdf 6) Revise the Development and Landscape Plans for consistency regarding the location of loading areas. DS 2-07.2.1.A 7) Revise the Development and Landscape Plans to provide screening for loading areas per LUC Table 3.7.2-I. 8) Revise the plans to show any landscape borders or screening elements required or previously approved for the for the north and west property boundaries. LUC 3.7.1.2 Submit previously approved plans that address these areas. |
| 06/25/2008 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN | Approved | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT D06-0050 The Pavilions (Core Review) 6/24/08 ( ) Tentative Plat ( X ) Development Plan ( X ) Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other CROSS REFERENCE: C09-68-70 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Broadway-Craycroft Area Plan GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: Gateway COMMENTS DUE BY: June 25, 2008 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment () Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies () See Additional Comments Attached ( X ) No Additional Comments - Complies with Planning Comments Submitted on 11/29/06 () No Resubmittal Required: () Tentative Plat () Development Plan () Landscape Plan () Architectural Elevations and Renderings REVIEWER: JBeall 791-4505 DATE: 6/24/08 |
| 07/08/2008 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | SUBJECT: The Pavilions D06-0050 Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the development plan submitted June 12, 2008. Alberta Adrian Office Specialist 918-8347 Ofc. 793-7504 Pgr. |
| 07/10/2008 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Approved | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 JENNIFER STEPHENS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: JENNIFER STEPHENS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: D06-0050 THE PAVILIONS/REVISED DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE: 7/09/08 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and we hereby approve this project. 1.) Submit a 24 x 36 Reverse Reading Double Matte Photo Mylar of approved Development Plan to City Planning. Signed and dated Mylar will be forwarded to Pima County Addressing prior to assignment of addresses. 2.) All addresses will need to be displayed per Pima County Address Standards at the time of final inspection. |
| 07/17/2008 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES July 17, 2008 John Lupo Castro Engineering Corp. 3580 West Ina Road, Suite 200 Tucson, Arizona 85741 Subject: D06-0050 The Pavilions Revised Development Plan Dear John: Your submittal of June 12, 2008 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 8 Copies Revised Development Plan (ADA, ESD, Engineering, Landscape, Fire, Wastewater, Zoning, DSD) 4 Copies Revised Landscape Plan (Engineering, Landscape, Zoning, DSD) 2 Copies Revised Drainage Statement (Engineering, DSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4919. Sincerely, Patricia Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 293-2115 dp-resubmittal |