Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - DEV PLAN
Permit Number - D06-0045
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - DEV PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 03/15/2007 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 03/16/2007 | PAUL MACHADO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | To: Patricia Gehlen DATE: April 13, 2007 CDRC/Zoning Manager SUBJECT: Brown/Rita Ranch Lot 23, 9121 E. Cam. De Abril Development Plan D06-0045 (Second Review) T15S, R15E, Section 27 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Development Plan and Drainage Statement. The Development Plan (DP) and Drainage Statement (DS) cannot be approved as submitted. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal. Development Plan: 1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the DP. 2. Please list estimated cut & fill quantities. The DP is a Site plan with a re-zoning history. The c/f quantities will be checked against the grading plan for consistency. The c/f quantities an estimate only. Revise as required. 3. Show refuse container location, size, and access thereto fully dimensioned per D.S. 2-02.2.1.32 and D.S. 6-01.0. The approach to the refuse enclosure still does not meet standards. Perhaps a meeting to discuss it's location is necessary. Contact Paul Machado for an appt. 4. Show drainage protection at the discharge point of the P.A.A.L. area. Call out and dimension the rip-rap used for protection. Details of all drainage structures are required on the DP. 5. Per the DR by Ryan engineers, the gunite channel at the North property line is 0.5' thick. The proposed "weir/cut" of 0.375' into the exist. gunite channel will only leave 0.125' thick of concrete w/o steel reinforcement. The proposed "weir/cut" must be re-built into the exist. gunite with a thickness of 0.5' min. Details of all drainage structures are required on the DP. Drainage Statement: 1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the DS. 2. This review was performed for Development Plan purposes only. Final review and acceptance will be at the grading plan stage. 3. Show drainage protection at the discharge point of the P.A.A.L. area. Call out and dimension the rip-rap used for protection. 4. Per the DR by Ryan engineers, the gunite channel at the North property line is 0.5' thick. The proposed "weir/cut" of 0.375' into the exist. gunite channel will only leave 0.125' thick of concrete w/o steel reinforcement. The proposed "weir/cut" must be re-built into the exist. gunite with a thickness of 0.5' min. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 837-4932 or Paul.Machado@tucsonaz.gov Paul P. Machado Senior Engineering Associate City of Tucson/Development Services Department 201 N. Stone Avenue, P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210, (520) 837-4932 office, (520) 879-8010 fax, C:/9121 E Camino De Abril CDRC Lot 23_2 |
| 04/10/2007 | JOSE ORTIZ | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Denied | April 10, 2007 ACTIVITY NUMBER: D06-0045 PROJECT NAME: East Camino Abril Lot # 23 PROJECT ADDRESS: 9121 E. Camino Abril PROJECT REVIEWER: Jose E. Ortiz PE, Traffic Engineer Resubmittal Required: Traffic Engineering does not recommend approval of the Development Plan; therefore a revised Development Plan is required for re-submittal. The following items must be revised or added to the plan. 1. Include a response letter with the next submittal that states how all comments have been addressed. 2. Ensure that the solid waste vehicle can maneuver on-site to gather and leave the site without backing into the public roadway. The exhibit provided does not correctly illustrate the maneuvering motion of a standard solid waste vehicle. Please revisit and revise exhibit to ensure that solid waste vehicles can maneuver on site and leave the site face forward. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-4259 x305 or Jose.Ortiz@tucsonaz.gov |
| 04/11/2007 | ANDY VERA | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Denied | * Enclosure detail will work as shown. * Vehicle maneuverability does not work as shown on page 3. Service vehicle requires adequate space to maneuver and position itself safely within the development without having to back into the street. Requires a 36' inside rear wheel and 50' outside front bumper turning radii which the drawing does not demonstrate accurately. |
| 04/11/2007 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Approved | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: D06-0045 EAST CAMINO DE ABRIL/REVISED DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE: 4/11/07 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and we hereby approve this project. Submit a 24 x 36 Reverse Reading Double Matte Photo Mylar of approved Development Plan to City Planning. Signed and dated Mylar will be forwarded to Pima County Addressing prior to assignment of addresses. 2.) All addresses will need to be displayed per Pima County Address Standards at the time of final inspection. ES |
| 04/12/2007 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 04/16/2007 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES April 16, 2007 Steve Wollerman Southwestern Consulting Engineers, LLC 435 East 9th Street Tucson, Arizona 85705 Subject: D06-0045 East Camino Abril Lot 23 Development Plan Dear Steve: Your submittal of March 15, 2007 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 5 Copies Revised Development Plan (ESD, Zoning, Traffic, Engineering, DSD) 3 Copies Revised Landscape Plan (Zoning, Engineering, DSD) 2 Copies Revised Drainage Statement (Engineering, DSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 791-5608 extension 1179. Sincerely, Patricia Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 628-1063 |
| 04/16/2007 | KAROL ARAGONEZ | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Karol Aragonez Planner PROJECT: D06-0045 East Camino De Abril Lot 23 Development Plan Resubmittal TRANSMITTAL DATE: April 5, 2007 DUE DATE: April 12, 2007 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. Within the location map please label the S.P.R.R. line and the drainageway. DS 2-05.2.1.D.2 2. Uses that are indicated on the development plan must meet minimum motor vehicle and bicycle parking, off-street loading, and AEZ criteria. From the list of proposed uses and parking calculations, please remove the following uses: Communication and Trade Service and Repair Major. These uses will require additional parking and/or special requirements to be done to the site which currently cannot be met as drawn. 3. Please make sure that surrounding zoning is readable. Current font/style does not reproduce well and cannot be read. 4. Please provide a minimum distance of five (5) feet for a pedestrian refuge area between the building and PAAL. Within this refuge area a four (4) foot wide sidewalk must be provided and be physically separated with curbing. (DS 3-05.2.2.B.1) This is required along the northeast side of the building south of the loading space. 5. The sidewalk located along the northeast property line linking to the bicycle parking and portions abutting the PAAL along the north pedestrian path from the building along the fencing that is not considered a crosswalk, must be a four (4) foot wide concrete sidewalk and be physically separated from the vehicular travel lane by means of curbing, grade separation, barriers, railings, or other means. DS 2-08.4.1 & DS 2-08.5.1.A & C 6. Please revise the handicap parking detail C/3. For every six accessible spaces provided at least one shall be van accessible. The aisle is to increase to eight (8) feet per TDOT requirements for van accessible spaces for a total of sixteen (16) feet for both parking space and access aisle. 7. Signage for accessible parking is to be posted at seven (7) feet from the curb to the bottom of the sign per TDOT requirements. Please revise detail B/3 8. Please add the off-street loading requirements per Table 3 (LUC 3.4.5.3), one (1) space required for GFA between 1,500-10,000 sq. ft. to show that this requirement is being met. LUC 3.4.5.1 & LUC 3.4.5.3 9. Per DS 2-09.4.1 Class 2 bicycle parking facilities will be located no more than fifty (50) feet from the main building entrance(s). The current location is at fifty-five (55) feet from the proposed building. Please revise location. 10. It is suggested that Class 1 bicycle parking be removed from the development plan. Any use providing less than fifty (50) motor vehicle parking spaces may substitute Class 2 spaces for Class 1 spaces. LUC 3.3.7.8.A 11. Please correct the acronyms from AHD to ADC in general note 22. The reviewer provided the wrong acronym. 12. Please indicate that gate will remain open during business hours to allow access to required parking. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Karol Aragonez, (520) 791-5550, ext. 74960. KAA S:\zoning review\karol\planning\cdrc\developmentplan\D06-0045dpr.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development plan and additional requested documents. |