Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Number: D06-0043
Parcel: 141113810

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - DEV PLAN

Permit Number - D06-0043
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - DEV PLAN
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
03/15/2007 FERNE RODRIGUEZ START PLANS SUBMITTED Completed
03/16/2007 PAUL MACHADO ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied To: Patricia Gehlen DATE: April 25, 2007
CDRC/Zoning Manager

SUBJECT: Brown/Rita Ranch Lot 18, 8190 S. Cam De Cafe
Development Plan D06-0043 (Second Review)
T15S, R15E, Section 27

RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Development Plan and Drainage Statement.

The Development Plan (DP) and Drainage Statement (DS) cannot be approved as submitted. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal.

Development Plan:

1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the DP.
2. If the drainage from the roof will be directed towards the P.A.A.L. then scuppers will be needed to cross any sidewalks.
3. Please list estimated cut & fill quantities. The DP is a Site plan with a re-zoning history. The c/f quantities will be checked against the grading plan for consistency. The c/f quantities an estimate only. Revise as required.
4. Show refuse container location, size, and access thereto fully dimensioned per D.S. 2-02.2.1.32 and D.S. 6-01.0. The approach to the refuse enclosure still does not meet standards. Perhaps a meeting to discuss it's location is necessary. Contact Paul Machado for an appt.
5. Show drainage protection at the discharge point of the P.A.A.L. area. Call out and dimension the rip-rap used for protection. Details of all drainage structures are required on the DP.
6. Per the DR by Ryan engineers, the gunite channel at the North property line is 0.5' thick. The proposed "weir/cut" of 0.375' into the exist. gunite channel will only leave 0.125' thick of concrete w/o steel reinforcement. The proposed "weir/cut" must be re-built into the exist. gunite with a thickness of 0.5' min. Details of all drainage structures are required on the DP.

Drainage Statement:
1. This review was performed for Development Plan purposes only. Final review and acceptance will be at the grading plan stage.
2. Show drainage protection at the discharge point of the P.A.A.L. area. Call out and dimension the rip-rap used for protection.
3. Per the DR by Ryan engineers, the gunite channel at the North property line is 0.5' thick. The proposed "weir/cut" of 0.375' into the exist. gunite channel will only leave 0.125' thick of concrete w/o steel reinforcement. The proposed "weir/cut" must be re-built into the exist. gunite with a thickness of 0.5' min.

If you have any questions, I can be reached at 837-4932 or Paul.Machado@tucsonaz.gov
Paul P. Machado
Senior Engineering Associate
City of Tucson/Development Services Department
201 N. Stone Avenue
P.O. Box 27210
Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210,
(520) 837-4932 office,
(520) 879-8010 fax,
C:/8190 S. Camino De Cafe CDRC_lot_18_2
03/23/2007 JOSE ORTIZ COT NON-DSD TRAFFIC Approved
04/05/2007 KAROL ARAGONEZ ZONING REVIEW Denied CDRC TRANSMITTAL

TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office

FROM: Karol Aragonez
Planner

PROJECT: D06-0043
Camino Café Lot 18
Development Plan Resubmittal

TRANSMITTAL DATE: April 5, 2007

DUE DATE: April 12, 2007

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed.

1. Uses that are indicated on the development plan must meet minimum motor vehicle and bicycle parking, off-street loading, and AEZ criteria. From the list of proposed uses and parking calculations, please remove the following uses: Salvaging, Communication, and Trade Service and Repair Major. These uses will require additional parking and/or special requirements to be done to the site which currently cannot be met as drawn.

2. Please make sure that surrounding zoning is readable. Current font/style does not reproduce well and cannot be read.

3. The sidewalk located along the northeast property line linking to the bicycle parking and portions abutting the PAAL along the north pedestrian path from the dumpster area that is not considered a crosswalk, must be a four (4) foot wide concrete sidewalk and be physically separated from the vehicular travel lane by means of curbing, grade separation, barriers, railings, or other means.
DS 2-08.4.1 & DS 2-08.5.1.A & C

4. Per DS 2-09.4.1 Class 2 bicycle parking facilities will be located no more than fifty (50) feet from the main building entrance(s). The current location is at least one hundred and twenty (120) feet from the proposed building. Please revise location.

5. It is suggested that Class 1 bicycle parking be removed from the development plan. Any use providing less than fifty (50) motor vehicle parking spaces may substitute Class 2 spaces for Class 1 spaces.
LUC 3.3.7.8.A

6. Please dimension the back-up spur at the southwest end of the parking lot. The spur will be a minimum of three (3) feet in depth and will have a three (3) foot radii. A minimum distance of three (3) feet will be provided between the back of spur and any wall, screen, or other obstruction over six (6) inches in height.
DS 3-05.2.2.D

7. Please revise detail B/3. Signage for accessible parking is to be posted at seven (7) feet from the curb to the bottom of the sign per TDOT requirements.

8. Please add the off-street loading requirements per Table 3 (LUC 3.4.5.3), one (1) space required for GFA between 1,500-10,000 sq. ft. An additional off-street loading space will be required that is a minimum of twelve (12) feet wide by thirty-five (35) feet long to be able to meet all requirements of proposed uses listed.
LUC 3.4.5.1 & LUC 3.4.5.3

9. Please dimension the distance between the building and the north property line.
DS 2-05.2.4.I

10. Please correct the acronyms from AHD to ADC in general note 22. The reviewer provided the wrong acronym.

11. Please indicate that gate will remain open during business hours to allow access to required parking.

12. Please remove detail I/3 from the plan view that is shown cutting through the loading space. The detail does not match this portion of the site.


If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Karol Aragonez, (520) 791-5550, ext. 74960.

KAA S:\zoning review\karol\planning\cdrc\developmentplan\D06-0043dpr.doc

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development plan and additional requested documents.
04/11/2007 ANDY VERA ENV SVCS REVIEW Denied * Enclosure detail on page 3 will work as shown

* Vehicle maneuverability does not work as shown on page 3. Service vehicle requires adequate space to maneuver and position itself safely within the development without having to back into the street.
Requires a 36' inside rear wheel and 50' outside front bumper turning radii which the drawing does not demonstrate accurately.
04/12/2007 KAY MARKS PIMA COUNTY ADDRESSING Approved 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL
TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207

KAY MARKS
ADDRESSING OFFICIAL
PH: 740-6480
FAX #: 740-6370


TO: CITY PLANNING
FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL
SUBJECT: D06-0043 CAMINO DE CAFÉ LOT#18/REVISED DEVELOPMENT PLAN
DATE: 4/12/07



The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and we hereby approve this project.


Submit a 24 x 36 Reverse Reading Double Matte Photo Mylar of approved Development Plan to City Planning. Signed and dated Mylar will be forwarded to Pima County Addressing prior to assignment of addresses.

2.) All addresses will need to be displayed per Pima County Address Standards at the time of final inspection.


ES
04/12/2007 JOE LINVILLE LANDSCAPE REVIEW Approved
04/24/2007 FRODRIG2 PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER Approved April 24, 2007

TO: Steve Wollerman
Southwestern Consulting Engineers, LLC

THRU: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager
City of Tucson, Development Services Department

FROM: Chandubhai C. Patel, P.E., Civil Eng. Manager
Development Review Division (Wastewater)
Pima County Development Services Department

SUBJECT: Lot 18, Camino De Café Commercial Craft Site
Development Plan – 2nd Submittal
D06-043


The proposed sewer collection lines to serve the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use.


The Pima county Department of Environmental Quality and the Wastewater Management Department hereby approve the above referenced submittal of the Development Plan as received by us on March 19, 2007.

Please note the following: Approval of the above referenced submittal does not authorize the construction of public or private sewer collection lines, or water distribution lines. Prior to the construction of such features, a Construction Authorization (Approval to Construct) may need to be obtained from the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality.

Also, air quality active permits must be secured by the developer or prime contractor from the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality before constructing, operating, or engaging in any activity which may cause or contribute to air pollution.


If you have any questions regarding the above mentioned comments, please contact me.

Sincerely,



Chandubhai C. Patel, P.E.
Telephone: (520) 740-6563

Copy: Project File
04/26/2007 PATRICIA GEHLEN ZONING-DECISION LETTER REVIEW Denied COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES

April 26, 2007

Steve Wollerman
Southwestern Consulting Engineers, LLC
435 East 9th Street
Tucson, Arizona 85705

Subject: D06-0043 Camino De Café Lot 18 Development Plan

Dear Steve:

Your submittal of March 15, 2007 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed:

ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED

4 Copies Revised Development Plan (ESD, Zoning, Engineering, DSD)

3 Copies Revised Landscape Plan (Zoning, Engineering, DSD)

2 Copies Revised Drainage Statement (Engineering, DSD)






Should you have any questions, please call me at 791-5608 extension 1179.

Sincerely,

Patricia Gehlen
CDRC Manager

All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/
Via fax: 628-1063