Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Permit Number - D06-0043
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10/17/2006 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 10/19/2006 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 10/23/2006 | JCLARK3 | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Denied | * No known landfill within 1000 feet of this development. * Dumpster enclosure size meets the Development Standards. (Notes states that the gates has a type 'B' metal deck and a detail shows opaque slate. Please clarify.) * Required dumpster enclosure service area is 14' x 40' directly in front. From the design as shown the service trucks cannot be positioned in the service area. The design truck length for today is 36'. The service trucks cannot service the enclosure and turnaround in the design as shown. * No provisions are shown or mentioned for recycling. |
| 10/24/2006 | KAROL ARAGONEZ | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Karol Aragonez Planner PROJECT: D06-0043 Camino De Café Lot 18 Development Plan TRANSMITTAL DATE: October 23, 2006 DUE DATE: November 15, 2006 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is November 14, 2007. 2. Within the location map please label the S.P.R.R. line and the drainageway. DS 2-05.2.1.D.2 3. Please correct the letter style of the sec. number in the title block. 4. Please add annexation case number C9-84-84 with the subdivision case number. DS 2-05.2.1.K 5. Case number D06-0043 has been assigned to this development plan (DP). Please place this number in the right corner of all sheets of the DP, landscape plan, NPPO, and any other associated sheets. DS 2-05.2.2.B.2 6. It appears that the principal use of the site is "Craftswork" under the Industrial Use Group. General note 2 lists two principal uses as Office and Craftswork. If the office supports the craftswork being conducted on site then office use is not a separate use. If two owners share the site conducting separate businesses then general note 2 would be appropriate. Please revise. Note: the AHD-2 of the AEZ does not allow administrative and professional office use. LUC 2.1.4 & LUC 2.8.5.8.B.2.b 7. Please add to the proposed use that craftswork is subject to LUC Sec. 3.5.5.1.B, F, G, and H. 8. Please revise general note 18 to read "This project is designed to meet the overlay zone criteria of Sec. 2.8.5, Airport Environs Zone (AEZ)". DS 2-05.2.2.B.10 9. Please draw all existing easements on the plan along with recordation information, location, width, and purpose. If an easement is no longer in use and scheduled to be vacated or has been abandoned, so indicate. If none exist provide response to reviewer's comments. Also if easements are purposed please draw, dimension and label as to their purpose and whether they will be public or private. If none exist provide response to reviewer's comments. DS 2-05.2.3.B & DS 2-05.2.4.G 10. Please provide the overall right-of-way width of Camino De Café. The sidewalk is dimensioned as three (3) feet in plan view but keynote 2 calls out the sidewalk width as four (4) feet. Please correct. If the sidewalk is currently three (3) feet refer to DS 3-01.4.1.A.1.b. DS 2-05.2.3.C & DS 3-01.4.1.A.1.b 11. Please add all existing zoning classifications on and adjacent to the project, including across Camino De Café and across the Drainage easement on sheet 2 of 3. All surrounding zoning is I-1. DS 2-05.2.4.B 12. Please add to the motor vehicle parking calculations the LUC parking requirement of "one (1) space per five hundred (500) sq. ft. GFA". LUC 3.3.4 Industrial Use Group 13. The PAAL cross section J/3 does not depict what is shown in plan view on sheet 2 of 3. A minimum distance of five (5) feet for a pedestrian refuge area must be maintained between any enclosed building and a PAAL. Within this refuge area a four (4) foot wide sidewalk must be provided. (DS 3-05.2.2.B.1) The minimum width of a two-way traffic aisle is twenty-four (24) feet. (DS 3-05.2.1.C.1) The smaller width gate blocks half the PAAL. 14. The width of the Handicap parking space must be increased to ten (10) feet. When sides of a parking space abuts any vertical barrier over six (6) inches in height, the required width for the space is ten (10) feet to provide extra width to allow passengers to enter and exit the vehicle on the side where the barrier exists. In this case the barrier is the screen wall of the dumpster surround. Wheel stop curbing is to be added to the handicap detail placed two and one half (2.5) feet from front of the parking space. DS 3-05.2.1.B.3 & DS 3-05.2.3.C.2 15. Detectable warnings (truncated domes) are required at all accessible aisles. The area covered by the truncated domes shall be twenty-four (24) inch deep and extend the full width of the access aisles of handicapped motor vehicle parking spaces. The domes shall be located so the edge nearest the curb line is six (6) inches to eight (8) inches from the curb line. ANSI 406.12, ANSI 705 16. Please dimension the back-up spur at the east end of the parking lot. The spur will be a minimum of three (3) feet in depth and will have a three (3) foot radii. A minimum distance of three (3) feet will be provided between the back of spur and any wall, screen, or other obstruction over six (6) inches in height. DS 3-05.2.2.D 17. Please revise the handicap parking detail C/3. For every six accessible spaces provided at least one shall be van accessible. The aisle is to increase to eight (8) feet per TDOT requirements for van accessible spaces. 18. Signage for accessible parking is to be posted at seven (7) feet from the curb to the bottom of the sign per TDOT requirements. 19. Please denote any outdoor storage area or site area dedicated to principal use, but excluding vehicle use areas. The area should be dimensioned with the square footage provided. This is used to calculate the require number of off-street loading spaces in addition to GFA. If no additional outdoor area is added the number of required off-street loading space would be one (1), not two (2). Please revise according. LUC 3.4.3.3 and LUC 3.4.5.1 20. Please provide the FAR calculations on sheet 1 of 3. Per LUC Sec. 2.8.5.8.B.1.c the maximum FAR is 0.30 of the project site. A FAR greater than that would be permitted only if a protected development right plan, was approved by Mayor and Council specifically for such development prior to June 30, 2005. LUC 2.8.5.8.B.1.c & LUC 2.8.5.8.B.3.c 21. Please dimension the distance between the building and the north and east property line. Provide the street setback from Camino De Café. The required setback is the greater of twenty-one (21) feet or the building wall height measured from the back of travel lane. DS 2-05.2.4.I 22. Please clearly show the sidewalk on site connecting to the existing sidewalk within Camino De Café. DS 2-08.4.1.A 23. Please add to detail or by note that sidewalk cross-slope will not exceed two (2) percent. DS 2-08.5.1.D 24. The current location of the class 2 bicycle parking spaces is placed directly in front of proposed motor vehicle parking. This would make access to the bike parking difficult if cars are parked. Relocating the bike parking to the end of the landscape area so bikes can access from the PAAL would be acceptable and meet DS 2-09.3.2. Per DS 2-09.4.3 the bicycle parking facility must be separated from vehicular parking and drive areas by a barrier to prevent damage to the parked bicycles. Racks placed in a row will allow a minimum seventy-two (72) inch length per bicycle parking space and thirty-six inches between a bicycle parking space and a perpendicular wall measured from the end of the rack and thirty (30) inches from a parallel wall (DS 2-09.5.1). Lighting will be provided in a bicycle parking area such that all facilities are thoroughly illuminated and visible from adjacent parking lots or buildings, during hours of use (DS 2-09.5.4). Please revise plan view and detail as required. 25. Please show sight visibility triangles as required by 3-01.5.0 DS 2-05.2.4.R 26. Please indicate the location and type of postal service to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements. If mail is to be delivered to an area with a building please state so on the plan. DS 2-05.2.4.V 27. Indicate the locations and types of proposed signs (wall, freestanding, pedestal) to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements and that minimal locational requirements can be met. Also indicate if there are existing billboards on site. Billboards will be required to meet all LUC requirements as stated in LUC Sec. 3.5.4.26. If none exists please state so. DS 2-05.2.4.W & LUC 3.5.4.26 28. Please add the following notes to meet requirements of the Airport Environs Zone (AEZ) AHD-2 and NCD-A-65-70 Ldn: a) "No more than twenty (20) employees per acre of the site area at any time may be accommodated by intention, design, or in fact." b) "The maximum FAR is 0.30 of the project site area." c) "The Final Plat Brown/Rita Ranch, Lots 1-42, Bk. 54, Pg. 84 was recorded June 7, 2001 prior to January 1, 2005 allowing lot 18, which is less than five (5) acres, to be developed in conformance with all other requirements specified in LUC Sec. 2.8.5.8.B.1., 2., and 3." d) "Offices on site will be sound attenuated, to reduce the interior noise level by twenty-five (25) decibels, to 40-45 Ldn, per DS9-05.0." 29. All changes, modifications, and/or corrections must be made on all applicable plans including the development plan, landscape plan, and NPPO. Once changes, modifications, and/or corrections are made and reviewed further comments may result. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Karol Aragonez, (520) 791-5550, ext. 1197. KAA S:\zoning review\karol\planning\cdrc\developmentplan\D06-0043dp.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development plan and additional requested documents. |
| 10/30/2006 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | NO COMMENT D06-0043 SOUTHWESTERN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, LLC CAMINO DE CAFÉ LOT# 18 -------------------------------------------------------- Confidentiality and Nondisclosure Notice: This email transmission and any attachments are intended for use by the person(s)/entity(ies) named above and may contain confidential/privileged information. Any unauthorized use, disclosure or distribution is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by e-mail, and delete or destroy all copies plus attachments. |
| 10/30/2006 | JOSE ORTIZ | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Denied | October 30, 2006 ACTIVITY NUMBER: D06-0043 PROJECT NAME: Camino De Café Lot # 18 PROJECT ADDRESS: 8190 S Camino De Cafe PROJECT REVIEWER: Jose E. Ortiz PE, Traffic Engineer Resubmittal Required: Traffic Engineering does not recommend approval of the Development Plan; therefore a revised Development Plan is required for re-submittal. The following items must be revised or added to the plan. 1. Include a response letter with the next submittal that states how all comments have been addressed. 2. Label the Sight Visibility Triangles. (DS 2-05.2.4.R) 3. If applicable, dimension the width of all ingress/egress points (Tucson City Code, Chapter 25, section 39 & 40) 4. Tucson City Code Chapter 25 Section 39 requires a minimum driveway separation of 20'. Ensure that this City Code is being met. 5. A permit or a private improvement agreement will be necessary for any work performed within the Right-of-way. Contact Permits and Codes at (520) 791-5100 for permit information. 6. Will the DOT Permits and Codes division allow the project entry with tie-in to wedge curb? 7. Ensure that the solid waste vehicle can maneuver on-site to gather and leave the site without backing into the public roadway. The exhibit provided, on sheet 3 detail K, illustrates that the solid waste vehicle will enter the solid waste enclosure on a skew and will not be able to maneuver as illustrated. The entrance onto the site may need to be adjusted to allow for this maneuver. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-4259 x305 or Jose.Ortiz@tucsonaz.gov |
| 10/31/2006 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | 4350 E. Irvington Road, Tucson, AZ 85714 Post Office Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702 WR#172244 October 31, 2006 Southern Consulting Engineers, LLC Attn: Steve Wollerman 435 E 9th St. Tucson, Arizona 85705 Dear Mr. Wollerman : SUBJECT: Camino de Cafe Lot 18 D06-0043 Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the development plan submitted October 17, 2006. It appears that there are no conflicts with the existing facilities within the boundaries of this proposed development. TEP will need a full set of approved site, electrical load, paving off-site improvements and irrigation plans. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. Any relocation costs will be billable to the customer. In order to apply for electric service, call the New Construction Department at (520) 918-8300. Submit a final set of plans including approved site, offsite and electrical load plans. Include a CD with the AutoCAD version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Your final plans should be sent to: Tucson Electric Power Company Attn: Ms. Mary Boice New Business Project Manager P. O. Box 711 (DB-101) Tucson, AZ 85702 520-917-8732 Please call the area Designer Todd Stocksdale at (520) 917-8715, should you have any questions. Sincerely, Elizabeth Miranda Office Support Specialist Design/Build lm Enclosures cc: P. Gehlen and F. Rodriguez, City of Tucson (email) T. Stocksdale, Tucson Electric Power |
| 10/31/2006 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Approved | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT D06-0043 Camino De Café Lot #18 10/30/06 () Tentative Plat () Development Plan () Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other CROSS REFERENCE: Annexation C9-84-84 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Esmond Station GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: COMMENTS DUE BY: 11/15/06 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment (XXXX) Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies () See Additional Comments Attached () No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: () Resubmittal Required: () Tentative Plat () Development Plan () Landscape Plan () Other REVIEWER: D.R. Corral 791-4505 DATE: 10/26/06 |
| 11/06/2006 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | DATE: November 3, 2006 TO: Ferne Rodriguez, Development Services FROM: Glenn Hicks Parks and Recreation 791-4873 ext. 215 Glenn.Hicks@tucsonaz.gov CC: SUBJECT: D06-0043 Camino De Café Lot #18: Development Plan(10-17-06) Staff has no comments. |
| 11/07/2006 | FRODRIG2 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Approved | Transportation Information for Rezoning, Subdivision, and Development Requests Delivered to: Date Delivered: Development Services - City of Tucson 11/3/2006 Case Number Project Name Average number of daily trips (ADT) forecasted as a result of the proposed development This information is provided for jurisdictional planning departments to assess the impact of the proposed residential or commercial development on surrounding traffic patterns and roads. If the forecasted daily traffic exceeds 500 average daily trips, a more detailed analysis is also provided. D06-0043 40 Camino de Cafe Lot#18 Pima Association of Governments Sandra C. Holland, Data Services 177 N. Church Ave., Suite 405, Tucson, Arizona 85701-1127 (520) 792-1093 FAX (520) 620-6981 |
| 11/09/2006 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) The loading area is required to be screened from the street per LUC table 3.7.2-I. Revise the landscape and development plans to include the required wall. 2) Submit a native plant preservation plan or application for exception with appropriate documentation. LUC 3.8 3) A vehicular use area must be provided with post barricades or wheel stop curbing designed to prevent parked vehicles from extending beyond the property lines; damaging adjacent landscaping, walls, or buildings per DS 3-05.2.3.C. Revise the plans as necessary. 4) Provide a six-foot high screen for outdoor storage areas per LUC Table 3.7.2-I. 5) Show all proposed screen walls on the development plans. DS 2-07. 6) Revise the landscape plan to show the locations and note the height and materials used to construct any proposed or required screen walls. DS 2-07.A.3 |
| 11/14/2006 | ED ABRIGO | PIMA COUNTY | ASSESSOR | Passed | |
| 11/14/2006 | FRODRIG2 | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Approved | D06-0043, Camino De Cafe LOT #18 No comments. |
| 11/14/2006 | PGEHLEN1 | TUCSON WATER NEW AREA DEVELOPMENT | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 11/15/2006 | PAUL MACHADO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | To: Patricia Gehlen DATE: November 22, 2006 CDRC/Zoning Manager SUBJECT: Brown/Rita Ranch Lot 18, 8190 S. Cam. De Cafe Development Plan D06-0043 (First Review) T15S, R15E, Section 27 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Development Plan and Drainage Report. The Development Plan (DP) and Drainage Statement (DS) cannot be approved as submitted. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal. Development Plan: 1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the DP. 2. As per the Federal ADA requirements, all wheel chair ramps shall have the truncated domes instead of the standard grooves that are shown on COT SD 207. Aside from the Truncated Domes, all wheel chair ramps shall be constructed in accordance with COT SD 207. 3. Please provide property description per D.S. 2-02.2.1.3. 4. Provide area of disturbance. 5. There are many discrepancies on the development plan. Re-check for mistakes and revise as needed. 6. Please label lot dimensions and bearings per D.S. 2-02.2.1.5. Correct all distances per the final plat. 7. Label existing and/or future sight visibility triangles per D.S. 2-02.2.1.10. 8. Please label all vehicular, bicycle, pedestrian, and handicapped circulation clearly identified per D.S. 2-02.2.1.12. The sidewalk shall be separated by a physical mean from the P.A.A.L. 9. Please provide Drainage patterns and finished grades per D.S. 2-02.2.1.16. 10. Please list estimated cut & fill quantities per D.S. 2-02.2.1.17. 11. All easement of record must be graphically shown on the plan together with recording docket and page per D.S. 2-02.2.1.20. Correct the size of the utility esmts. at the R/W line. 12. Per the final plat, add the existing channel's maintenance responsibility note maintenance responsibility note per S.M.D.D.F.M. 2.3.1.6 C 1 and 2 to the DP. 13. Dimension from street monument lines to existing and proposed curbs, sidewalks, driveways, and utility lines per D.S. 2-02.2.1.21. 14. Show Development plan number (D06-0043) on all sheets per D.S. 2-02.2.1.29. 15. Show refuse container location, size, and access thereto fully dimensioned per D.S. 2-02.2.1.32 and D.S. 6-01.0. 16. Correct the basis of bearing per the final plat. 17. Curb radii are required at the driveway with w/c ramps and a minimum 18' radius. A permit or a private improvement agreement will be necessary for any work performed within the Right-of-way. Contact Permits and Codes at (520) 791-5100 for permit information. 18. Please show a typical cross section of the P.A.A.L. or call out the percentage of slopes. Call out the GB at the D/W, if applicable. Slopes percentages shall be shown whether the slopes are cross slopes or longitudinal. 19. Please show the proposed roof drainage patterns, 100% of the 10-year flow must be conveyed under the sidewalks including any other site drainage as well. Please provide supporting calculations to demonstrate compliance with D.S. 3-01.4.4. If the location(s) of the roof scuppers have not yet been decided, a general note indicating sidewalk scuppers will be used when the roof scuppers locations have been designed and located will suffice. 20. Add note: "Depress all landscaped areas 6" maximum for water harvesting" and show by using drainage arrows how the water will be directed into the water harvesting areas. 6" depressed curbs may be necessary to allow water into planters. 21. A Stormwater pollution prevention plan may be is required. List the area and show the grading limits on the plan. Contact Paul P. Machado at 791-5550 x1193 for additional information. 22. "A grading permit and Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans (SWPPP's) will be required for this project. Submit 4 sets of grading and SWPPP's with text, upon completion and submittal of a grading permit application. A grading permit may not be issued prior to site plan approval. Subsequent comments may be necessary, depending upon the nature and extent of revisions that occur to the plans". Drainage Statement: 1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the DS. 2. This review was performed for Tentative Plat purposes only. Final review and acceptance will be at the grading plan stage. 3. Include a statement in the DS that you have reviewed the DR prepared by Ryan Engineers dated April 18, 2000 and agree to that data. 4. Include in this DS any maps, exhibits, figures etc. that pertain to or are used in the generating of the DS from the DR prepared by Ryan Engineers dated April 18, 2000. 5. Per the final plat, add the existing channel's maintenance responsibility note and checklist per S.M.D.D.F.M. 2.3.1.6 C 1 and 2 to the DS. 6. Show drainage protection at the discharge point of the P.A.A.L. area. 7. Add a cover sheet to the DS including the project name, COT activity, address etc. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550 x1193 or Paul.Machado@tucsonaz.gov Paul P. Machado Senior Engineering Associate City of Tucson/Development Services Department 201 N. Stone Avenue P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210,(520) 791-5550 x1193 office, (520) 879-8010 fax, C:/8190 S. Camino De Cafe CDRC |
| 11/15/2006 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: D06-0043 CAMINO DE CAFÉ LOT#18/DEVELPOMENT PLAN DATE: 11/15/06 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: Section corners are not accurate in Location Map. Please revise. Label adjacent lot numbers (sheets 1 and 2). es |
| 12/04/2006 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES December 4, 2006 Steve Wollerman Southwestern Consulting Engineers, LLC 435 East 9th Street Tucson, Arizona 85705 Subject: D06-0043 Camino De Café Lot 18 Development Plan Dear Steve: Your submittal of October 17, 2006 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 8 Copies Revised Development Plan (ESD, Zoning, Traffic, Landscape, Engineering, Addressing, Wastewater, DSD) 4 Copies Revised Landscape Plan (Zoning, Landscape, Engineering, DSD) 2 Copies Revised NPPO Plan (Landscape, DSD) 2 Copies Revised Drainage Report (Engineering, DSD) ALTHOUGH PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER CONDITIONALLY APPROVED THIS DEVELOPMENT PLAN, THE CITY OF TUCSON CDRC OFFICE CAN NOT REVIEW FOR THE CONDITIONS SO ANOTHER SUBMITTAL WILL BE REQUIRED TO WASTEWATER. Should you have any questions, please call me at 791-5608 extension 1179. Sincerely, Patricia Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 628-1063 |
| 12/04/2006 | TIM ROWE | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Approv-Cond | December 1, 2006 To: Steve Wollerman, Southwestern Consulting Engineers, LLC Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager City of Tucson, Development Services Department ____________________________________ From: Michael J.Harrington (520-740-6579), representing the Pima County Departments of Wastewater Management and Environmental Quality Subject: Lot 18, Camino De Café Commercial Craft Site Development Plan - 1st Submittal (corrected) D06-0043 The proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. This project will be tributary to the Roger Road Wastewater Treatment Facility via the Southeast Interceptor. Per written guidance provided by the PCWMD Development Services Section, sufficient conveyance and treatment capacity exists in the downstream public sewerage system for this small project, and a formal capacity response letter from the PCWMD will not be required. All Sheets: Add the development plan case number, D06-0043, to the title block of each sheet. This number should be shown larger or bolder than any cross reference numbers. No wastewater review fees will be charged for sheets where this is the only required revision. Sheet 1: Revise General Note #14, so that it states: THIS PROJECT WILL HAVE ZERO EXISTING AND 40 PROPOSED WASTEWATER FIXTURE UNIT EQUIVALENTS PER TABLE 13.20.045(E)(1) IN PIMA COUNTY CODE 13.20.045(E). Sheet 2: Revise the site plan to show: The adjacent lots, shaded and identified with the lot numbers. Sheet 2: Revise the site plan so that it shows: The existing downstream public sewer manhole #3953-06. And show a flow arrow over the sewer main. Sheet 2: In the Keynotes block, Keynotes #6, EXISTING PUBLIC WATER MAIN, on the site plan is pointed to the public sewer. Connect the Keynote label to the water main on the site plan. Sheet 2: In the Keynotes block, Keynotes #8, EXISTING INV. OF BCS…, points to a 4” BCS located at the south corner of the lot. The As Built, G-99-131, construction plan for the public sewer, shows the existing BCS, northeast, by the cul-de-sac and lot 17. Verify the location of the existing BCS. Subject to the above, the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality and Wastewater Management Department hereby approve the above referenced submittal of the development plan. The required revision(s) may be shown on the Mylars. Please note the following: Approval of the above referenced submittal does not authorize the construction of public or private sewer collection lines, or water distribution lines. Prior to the construction of such features, a Construction Authorization (Approval To Construct) may need to be obtained from the Pima County Environmental Quality. Also, air quality activity permits must be secured by the developer or prime contractor from the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality before constructing, operating or engaging in an activity which may cause or contribute to air pollution. If you have any questions regarding the above mentioned comments, please contact me at the telephone number shown under my signature on the first page of this letter CC: Project File |