Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Permit Number - D06-0042
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/05/2007 | PAUL MACHADO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | To: Patricia Gehlen DATE: January 10, 2007 CDRC/Zoning Manager FROM: Paul Machado Engineering Division SUBJECT: 9417 E. Old Vail Rd CDRC Development Plan D06-0042 (First Review) T15S, R15E, Section 27 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Development Plan. The Development Plan (DP) cannot be approved as submitted. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal. Development Plan: 1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the DP. 2. As per the Federal ADA requirements, all wheel chair ramps shall have the truncated domes instead of the standard grooves that are shown on COT SD 207. Aside from the Truncated Domes, all wheel chair ramps shall be constructed in accordance with COT SD 207. 3. Please provide property description per D.S. 2-02.2.1.3. 4. Please label lot dimensions and bearings per D.S. 2-02.2.1.5 5. Provide all existing and proposed buildings and structures, including location, size, height, overhangs, canopies, and use per D.S. 2-02.2.1.6. 6. Label existing and future sight visibility triangles per D.S. 2-02.2.1.10. 7. Show all points of egress and ingress including locations and width of driveways and parking area access lanes (P.A.A.L.) per D.S. 2-02.2.1.11. 8. Please label all vehicular, bicycle, pedestrian, and handicapped circulation clearly identified per D.S. 2-02.2.1.12. 9. Fully-dimensioned loading space(s) and maneuvering area(s) per D.S. 2-02.2.1.14. 10. Show the limits of the 100-year floodplain and water surface elevation per D.S. 2-02.2.1.15. 11. Please provide Drainage patterns and finished grades per D.S. 2-02.2.1.16. 12. Please list estimated cut & fill quantities per D.S. 2-02.2.1.17. 13. Please show dimensioned right-of-way, including any applicable Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Plan right-of-way per D.S. 2-02.2.1.19. 14. Add the basin(s) maintenance responsibility note per S.M.D.D.F.M. 2.3.1.6 C 1 and 2 to the DP. 15. Dimension from street monument lines to existing and proposed curbs, sidewalks, driveways, and utility lines per D.S. 2-02.2.1.21. 16. Location and orientation of existing major physical features, such as railroad tracks and drainageways per D.S. 2-02.2.1.22. 17. Please provide existing topographic contours at intervals not exceeding two (2) feet and/or spot elevations as pertinent and Bench Mark based on City of Tucson Datum, including City Field Book and page number per D.S. 2-02.2.1.23. 18. Show all fences, walls, or vegetation for screening and sight visibility by type, material, height, location and spacing per D.S. 2-02.2.1.27. 19. Show Development plan (D06-0042) number on all sheets per D.S. 2-02.2.1.29. 20. Show refuse container location, size, and access thereto fully dimensioned per D.S. 2-02.2.1.32 and D.S. 6-01.0. Provide a detail of the dumpster enclosure on the plans. 21. A permit or a private improvement agreement will be necessary for any work performed within the Right-of-way. Contact Permits and Codes at (520) 791-5100 for permit information. 22. Please show a typical cross section of the P.A.A.L. or call out the percentage of slopes. Call out the GB at the D/W, if applicable. 23. Please show the proposed roof drainage patterns, 100% of the 10-year flow must be conveyed under the sidewalks including any other site drainage as well. Please provide supporting calculations to demonstrate compliance with D.S. 3-01.4.4. If the location(s) of the roof scuppers have not yet been decided, a general note indicating sidewalk scuppers will be used when the roof scuppers locations have been designed and located will suffice. 24. "A grading permit and Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans (SWPPP's) will be required for this project. Submit 4 sets of grading and SWPPP's with text, upon completion and submittal of a grading permit application. A grading permit may not be issued prior to site plan approval. Subsequent comments may be necessary, depending upon the nature and extent of revisions that occur to the plans". Drainage Report: 1. This review was performed for Development Plan purposes only. Final review and acceptance will done at the grading plan stage. 2. Show the project address or administration address on the cover sheet of the DR. 3. If applicable, add the basin(s) maintenance responsibility note and checklist per S.M.D.D.F.M. 2.3.1.6 C 1 and 2 to the DR. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550 x1193 or Paul.Machado@ci.tucsonaz.govs Paul P. Machado Senior Engineering Associate City of Tucson/Development Services Department 201 N. Stone Avenue P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210 (520) 791-5550 x1193 office (520) 879-8010 fax C/9417 E. Old Vail Rd CDRC |
| 01/11/2007 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES January 11, 2007 Wayne A. Royce Urban Engineering 877 South Alvernon Way Suite 200 Tucson, Arizona 85705 Subject: D06-0042 Rita Ranch Commerce Center Development Plan Dear Wayne: Your submittal of November 13, 2006 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 8 Copies Revised Development Plan (Landscape, ESD, Traffic, Addressing, Zoning, Wastewater, Engineering, DSD) 4 Copies Revised Landscape Plan (Landscape, Zoning, Engineering, DSD) 2 Copies Revised NPPO Plan (Landscape, DSD) 2 Copies Revised Drainage Report (Enigneering, DSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 791-5608 extension 1179. Sincerely, Patricia Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 318-3808 dp-resubmittal |
| 11/09/2006 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 11/16/2006 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | NO COMMENT D06-0042 URBAN ENGINEERING RITA RANCH COMMERCE CENTER -------------------------------------------------------- Confidentiality and Nondisclosure Notice: This email transmission and any attachments are intended for use by the person(s)/entity(ies) named above and may contain confidential/privileged information. Any unauthorized use, disclosure or distribution is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by e-mail, and delete or destroy all copies plus attachments. |
| 12/01/2006 | FRODRIG2 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Approved | Transportation Information for Rezoning, Subdivision, and Development Requests Delivered to: Date Delivered: Development Services - City of Tucson 11/30/2006 Case Number Project Name Average number of daily trips (ADT) forecasted as a result of the proposed development This information is provided for jurisdictional planning departments to assess the impact of the proposed residential or commercial development on surrounding traffic patterns and roads. If the forecasted daily traffic exceeds 500 average daily trips, a more detailed analysis is also provided. D06-0042 336 Rita Ranch Commerce Ctr. Lot 34 Pima Association of Governments Sandra C. Holland, Data Services 177 N. Church Ave., Suite 405, Tucson, Arizona 85701-1127 (520) 792-1093 FAX (520) 620-6981 |
| 12/04/2006 | JCLARK3 | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Denied | * No known landfill within 1000 feet of this development. * Refuse enclosure requires a 10' clear service area between the wall protection. * No sidewall protection shown. * Gates require positive anchorage system to secure the doors when they are open. * No provisions shown or discussed for recycling. |
| 12/04/2006 | JOSE ORTIZ | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Denied | December 4, 2006 ACTIVITY NUMBER: D06-0042 PROJECT NAME: Rita Ranch Commerce Centre PROJECT ADDRESS: 9417 E Old Vail Rd PROJECT REVIEWER: Jose E. Ortiz PE, Traffic Engineer Resubmittal Required: Traffic Engineering does not recommend approval of the Development Plan; therefore a revised Development Plan is required for re-submittal. The following items must be revised or added to the plat. 1. Include a response letter with the next submittal that states how all comments have been addressed. 2. Dimension width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks. (DS 2-05.2.2.D) 3. Tucson City Code Chapter 25 Section 39 states that the maximum driveway width is 30' (business district) 4. A permit or a private improvement agreement will be necessary for any work performed within the Right-of-way. Contact Permits and Codes at (520) 791-5100 for permit information. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-4259 x305 or Jose.Ortiz@tucsonaz.gov |
| 12/04/2006 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Add the CDRC case number and any related case numbers to the landscape and native plant preservation plans. DS 2-07.2.1.B 2) Revise note 1 on sheet 1 of the landscape plan. Existing zoning is I-1, there is no proposed zoning. 3) A vehicular use area must be provided with post barricades or wheel stop curbing designed to prevent parked vehicles from extending beyond the property lines; damaging adjacent landscaping, walls, or buildings and to prevent vehicles from driving onto unimproved portions of the site. per DS 3-05.2.3.C. Revise the plans as necessary to include a sufficient barrier at the edge of the paved area at the northeast portion of the site. 4) All disturbed, grubbed, graded, or bladed areas not otherwise improved shall be landscaped, reseeded, or treated with an inorganic or organic ground cover to help reduce dust pollution. Revise landscape plan to specify the treatment proposed for the retention basin. LUC 3.7.2.7. DS 2-06.5.2.C 5) Fifty (50) percent or more of the area of the street landscape border must be covered with shrubs or vegetative ground cover. The required ground coverage must be achieved within two (2) years from the date of planting. Provide calculations for vegetative coverage. DS 2-07.2.2, LUC 3.7.2.4.A.5 The use of vegetation to satisfy the screen requirement is allowed only to provide for alternative treatment and is not in any way meant to imply that the vegetative screen can also be used to meet the landscape coverage requirement. DS 2-06.3.7 6) Canopy trees must be evenly distributed throughout the vehicular use area. Every parking space shall be located within forty (40) feet of the trunk of a canopy tree (as measured from the center of the tree trunk). Revise the landscape plan as necessary. LUC 3.7.2.3.A 7) A fifteen (15) foot minimum height clearance, free of any overhead obstructions (wires, branches, etc.), must be provided above the refuse collection site. Revise the landscape plan as necessary. DS 6-01.2.1.B.1.b 8) Grading, hydrology, and landscape structural plans are to be integrated to make maximum use of site storm water runoff for supplemental on-site irrigation purposes. The landscape plan shall indicate use of all runoff, from individual catch basins around single trees to basins accepting flow from an entire vehicular use area or roof area. LUC 3.7.4.3.B Show water harvesting areas on the landscape plan. 9) Vegetation or structures higher than thirty (30) inches must be located outside of the sight visibility triangle. Show the sight visibility triangles on the landscape and development plans. DS 2-07.2.2 10) Revise the landscape plan to include the location and purpose of utility easements and other easements. DS 2-07.2.2.E.1 Trees and shrubs are to be selected and located so that, at maturity, they do not interfere with existing on-site or off-site utility service lines or utility. LUC 3.7.2.6.B 11) Revise the landscape plan plant legend and the NPP Mitigation Calculations to conform to the NPP Inventory Totals. Show all transplants on the planting plan. DS 2-15.3.4.B. 12) Dimension the length and width of landscape borders and the minimum dimensions for all tree planting areas on the landscape plan per DS 2-07.2.2.A.2.f. RESUBMITTAL OF ALL PLANS IS REQUIRED. |
| 12/04/2006 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 12/05/2006 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: D06-0042 RITA RANCH COMMERCE CENTER/DEVELOMENT PLAN DATE: December 5, 2006 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: Add recording Book and Page to Rita Ranch Commerce Center in Title Block. Correct Centre’ to “Center” on all adjacent lots (sheet 1). Correct all Book and Pages to Bk 49, Pg 34 on all adjacent lots (sheets 1 & 2). Correct Lot 35 to Lot 33 (sheet 1 & 2). Number Buildings numerically. Provide a “blank” Address Block on lower right side of sheet 1 (3” x 5”). jg |
| 12/06/2006 | KAROL ARAGONEZ | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | FROM: Karol Aragonez Planner PROJECT: D06-0042 Rita Ranch Commerce Centre Lot 34 Development Plan TRANSMITTAL DATE: December 5, 2006 DUE DATE: December 11, 2006 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is November 12, 2007. 2. Please correct the annexation case number in the lower right corner of all sheets. The correct number is C9-84-84 not C09-84-84. 3. Case number D06-0042 has been assigned to this development plan (DP). Please place this number in the right corner of all sheets of the development plan, landscape plan, NPPO, and any other associated sheets. DS 2-05.2.2.B.2 4. General note 3 lists the property as automotive service and repair. Parking calculations indicate uses as automotive service major and general merchandise and off street loading adds commercial storage as an additional use. On sheet 3 of 3 in detail 11 the use of the future building is labeled as general manufacturing. Please clarify the principal uses on the property. Per the commercial use group LUC Sec. 6.3.5.22 Trade Service and Repair includes bodywork and painting of automobiles. Please verify if commercial storage is for vehicles that are being worked on. If so then that use is accessory to the principal use and does not require separate calculations for parking and loading. Once the correct uses are provided motor vehicle/bicycle parking, and off street loading calculations are to be revised accordingly. Parking requirements are to be consistent with proposed uses. Parking calculations for motor vehicles, bicycle, and off street loading will not be reviewed until uses are determined. DS 2-05.2.2.B.3 & LUC 6.3.5.22 5. Please list all applicable conditions of annexation (C9-84-84, Ord. 6143) on the development plan as a note. A separate response letter detailing compliance with the conditions of annexation is to be provided with the resubmittal. DS 2-05.2.2.B.7 & 2-05.2.4.U 6. Please add the general note 4 the LUC Sec. 2.8.3 for MS&R and add Sec. 2.8.5, Airport Environs Zone (AEZ). DS 2-05.2.2.B.10 7. Please draw all existing easements on the plan along with recordation information, location, width, and purpose. If an easement is no longer in use and scheduled to be vacated or has been abandoned, so indicate. If none exist provide response to reviewer's comments. Also if easements are purposed please draw, dimension and label as to their purpose and whether they will be public or private. If none exist provide response to reviewer's comments. DS 2-05.2.3.B & DS 2-05.2.4.G 8. Please provide the recordation data, type and dimensioned width of existing paving, curbs, and sidewalks within Old Vail Road. DS 2-05.2.3.C 9. The minimum width for two way PAALs is twenty-four (24) feet. Please indicate if the PAALs to the east and west of the site are intended as two way or one way PAALs. If one way provide directional arrows to indicate traffic flow. If two way they must be increased to the minimum size. The PAAL abutting the future off-street loading space must also provide directional arrows to indicate direction of traffic flow. DS 3-05.2.1.C.1 10. Sidewalks are required adjacent and parallel to any PAAL on the side where buildings are located. They are to be physically separated from any vehicular travel lane by means of curbing, grade separation, barriers, railings, or other means. The current striped pedestrian areas do not met this requirement. Please revise. DS 2-08.4.1 & B 11. Please dimension the wheel stop cubing shown in detail 9 on sheet 3 of 3. The curbing is to be located two and one half (2 1/2) feet from the front of the parking space. DS 3-05.2.3.C.2 12. Please correct the handicap sign detail. The required height of the signage is seven (7) feet per TDOT regulations. 13. Detectable warnings (truncated domes) are required for access aisles to handicap parking spaces. The area covered by the truncated domes shall be twenty-four (24) inch deep and extend the full width access aisles of handicapped motor vehicle parking spaces. Please revised detail 9 on sheet 3 of 3 to include truncated domes. ANSI 406.12, ANSI 705 14. Please include in motor vehicle parking calculations the required number of handicap parking spaces (including number of van accessible) and the number provided. Once provided further comments may be generated. 15. Please add to the FAR maximum allowed as "Per Airport Environs Zone (AEZ) ADC-3". Correct maximum building height allowed to "sixty-two (62) feet from design grade per AEZ ADC-3". LUC 2.8.5.8.C.1.b & d 16. Please indicate what cross section 2/5 was taken from on the plan view. 17. Please provide information if the commercial parking units are enclosed, covered, etc. 18. Please provide a plan view detail of the proposed class 2 bicycle parking spaces. Single rack spaces placed in a row will allow a minimum of seventy -two (72) inch length per bicycle parking space and a minimum of thirty (30) inches between outer spaces of racks. A five (5) foot wide access aisle measured from the front or rear of the seventy-two (72) inch long parking space will be provided beside each row. Lighting will be provided such that all facilities are thoroughly illuminated and visible from adjacent sidewalks, parking lots, or buildings, during working hours. The surface of the facility can be surfaced the same as for motor vehicle parking or with a minimum of one (1) inch thickness of one-fourth (1/4) inch aggregate material. DS 2-09.5.1, DS2-09.5.2, DS 2-09.5.4, & DS 2-09.6.2 19. Please show sight visibility triangles for Old Vail Road based on the MS&R cross section. DS 2-05.2.4.R 20. Please indicate the location and type of postal service to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements. If mail is to be delivered to an area within a building please state so on the plan. DS 2-05.2.4.V 21. Indicate the locations and types of proposed signs (wall, freestanding, pedestal) to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements and that minimal locational requirements can be met. Also indicate if there are existing billboards on site. Billboards will be required to meet all LUC requirements as stated in LUC Sec. 3.5.4.26. If none exists please state so. DS 2-05.2.4.W & LUC 3.5.4.26 22. Please remove the subdivision coordinator box. This is not used. 23. All changes, modifications, and/or corrections must be made on all applicable plans including the development plan, landscape plan, and NPPO. Once changes, modifications, and/or corrections are made and reviewed further comments may result. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Karol Aragonez, (520) 791-5550, ext. 1197. KAA S:\zoning review\karol\planning\cdrc\developmentplan\D06-0042dp.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development plan and additional requested documents. |
| 12/11/2006 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | 4350 E. Irvington Road, Tucson, AZ 85714 Post Office Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702 WR#173382 December 11, 2006 Urban Engineering Attn: Wayne A. Royce 877 S Alvernon Way, Suite 200 Tucson, Arizona 85705 Dear Mr. Royce : SUBJECT: Rita Ranch Commerce Center D06-0042 Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the development plan submitted November 13, 2006. It appears that there are no conflicts with the existing facilities within the boundaries of this proposed development. TEP will need a full set of approved site, electrical load, paving off-site improvements and irrigation plans. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. Any relocation costs will be billable to the customer. In order to apply for electric service, call the New Construction Department at (520) 918-8300. Submit a final set of plans including approved site, offsite and electrical load plans. Include a CD with the AutoCAD version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Your final plans should be sent to: Tucson Electric Power Company Attn: Ms. Mary Boice New Business Project Manager P. O. Box 711 (DB-101) Tucson, AZ 85702 520-917-8732 Please call the area Designer Todd Stocksdale at (520) 917-8715, should you have any questions. Sincerely, Elizabeth Miranda Office Support Specialist Design/Build lm Enclosures cc: P. Gehlen and F. Rodriguez, City of Tucson (email) T. Stocksdale, Tucson Electric Power |
| 12/11/2006 | TIM ROWE | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | December 11, 2006 TO: Wayne Royce Urban Engineering. THRU: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager City of Tucson, Development Services Department FROM: Chandubhai C. Patel, P.E. Pima County Development Services Department Development Review Division (Wastewater) SUBJECT: Rita Ranch Commerce Center Lot # 34 Development Plan – 1st Submittal D06-042 The proposed sewer collection lines to serve the above-referenced development have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ), and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. ALL SHEETS. Add the project number, D06-042 to the title block of each sheet. This number should be shown larger or bolder than any cross-reference numbers. Provide a letter from PCWMD Development Services, written within the past 90 days, stating that the treatment and conveyance system capacity for this project is available. A capacity request form may be found at http://www.pima.gov/wwm/forms/docs/CapResponseRequest.pdf SHEET 1. Fill in the blanks in the GENERAL NOTE no. 12 about the Fixture Unit Equivalents. SHEET 1.Show a line symbol for New Private Sewer Line in the LEGEND. SHEET 1. The line symbols used for the existing and new Public Sewer lines are not readily distinguishable from each other. Please use symbols that are distinct from each other.. SHEET 1 & 2. The line symbols shown in the LEGEND on sheet 1for sewer lines are not the same as those used on drawing no. 2 for sewer lines. Please make necessary revisions on sheet no. 2. SHEET 2. Show how the ”Proposed Bldg” will be provided sewer service, showing the size, slope and invert elevations for the new sewer . SHEET 1 & 2. Show the six digit Pima County manhole numbers for the existing public manholes located immediately upstream and downstream of the planned connection point of the new sewer line to the existing 10-inch ESVCP. Also, show the invert and rim elevations of these manholes. We will require a revised set of drawings and a response letter addressing each comment. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. The next submittal of this project will be the 2nd submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $100.00 made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER must accompany the revised set of bluelines and the response letter. For any questions regarding the fee schedule, please go to http://www.pimaxpress.com/SubDivision/Documents/Fees.PDF where you may find the appropriate wastewater review fees at the bottom of page 1. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. If you have any questions regarding the above comments, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Chandubhai C. Patel, P.E. Telephone: (520) 740-6563 Copy: Project file |
| 12/12/2006 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | DATE: December 12, 2006 TO: Ferne Rodriguez, Development Services FROM: Glenn Hicks Parks and Recreation 791-4873 ext. 215 Glenn.Hicks@tucsonaz.gov CC: Patricia Gehlen SUBJECT: D06-0042 Rita Ranch Commerce Centre: Development Plan(11-13-06) Staff has no comments. |
| 12/13/2006 | ED ABRIGO | PIMA COUNTY | ASSESSOR | Passed | |
| 12/13/2006 | PGEHLEN1 | TUCSON WATER NEW AREA DEVELOPMENT | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 12/14/2006 | FRODRIG2 | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Approved | No comment |
| 12/20/2006 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Approved | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT D06-0042 Rita Ranch Commerce Centre 12/19/06 () Tentative Plat (XXXX) Development Plan (XXXX) Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment (XXXX) Other – Drainage Report CROSS REFERENCE: C9-84-84 Ordinance #6143 Rita Ranch NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Esmond Station GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: COMMENTS DUE BY: 12/11/06 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: (XXXX) No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment () Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies () See Additional Comments Attached () No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: () Resubmittal Required: () Tentative Plat () Development Plan () Landscape Plan () Other REVIEWER: D. R. Corral 791-4505 DATE: 12/19/06 |