Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Permit Number - D06-0041
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10/19/2006 | MARILYN KALTHOFF | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 10/23/2006 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 10/30/2006 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Denied | 4350 E. Irvington Road, Tucson, AZ 85714 Post Office Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702 WR# 172158 October 30, 2006 Rick Engineering Company, Inc Attn: Mr. Eduardo Gonzalez 1745 East River Road, Suite 101. Tucson, AZ 85718 Dear Mr. Gonzalez: SUBJECT: Tucson Mall Oil Stop D06-0041 Tucson Electric Power Company (TEP) has reviewed the plan submitted October 20, 2006. TEP is unable to approve the plan at this time. There are existing electrical facilities within the boundaries of this project. In order for TEP to approve the plan, we will need a full set of approved site, electrical load, paving off-site improvements and irrigation plans. * Electric/PUE easements are not identified on Development Plan. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facility map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. All costs associated with the relocation of the facilities in conflict will be billable to the developer. Please resubmit two revised bluelines to Pima County Development Services Department for TEP’s review. You may contact the area Designer, Warren McElyea at 918-8268 should you have any technical questions. My telephone number is 918-8297. Sincerely, Elizabeth Miranda Office Specialist lm Enclosure cc: P. Gehlen and F. Rodriguez, City of Tucson (by e-mail) W. McElyea, Tucson Electric Power |
| 10/30/2006 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | NO COMMENT D06-0041 RICK ENGINEERING COMPANY, INC. TUCSON MALL OIL STOP -------------------------------------------------------- Confidentiality and Nondisclosure Notice: This email transmission and any attachments are intended for use by the person(s)/entity(ies) named above and may contain confidential/privileged information. Any unauthorized use, disclosure or distribution is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by e-mail, and delete or destroy all copies plus attachments. |
| 10/31/2006 | JCLARK3 | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Denied | * No known landfill within 1000 feet of this development. * No. 5 symbol states that the trash enclosure will be per the Architects' drawings. Request details of the enclosure and how the refuse will be handled. including access. |
| 10/31/2006 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Denied | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT D06-0041 Tucson Oil Stop () Tentative Plat (XXXX) Development Plan (XXXX) Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other CROSS REFERENCE: Annexation C9-82-48, Ordinance No. 5651 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: North Stone GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: COMMENTS DUE BY: November 17, 2006 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment () Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies () See Additional Comments Attached () No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: (XXXX) Resubmittal Required: () Tentative Plat (XXXX) Development Plan (XXXX) Landscape Plan (XXXX) Other – Elevations and Color Palette REVIEWER: D. Corral 791-4505 DATE: October 26, 2006 The General Plan, North Stone Neighborhood Plan (NSNP), Design Guidelines Manual and the Stone Avenue Corridor: Measures for a Livable Corridor all provide guidance for the review of this development. The Stone Avenue Corridor: Measures for a Livable Corridor and the NSNP state that design proposals for properties adjacent to Stone Avenue should demonstrate sensitivity to nearby neighborhoods. The Design Guidelines Manual states this should be done through four-sided architecture and detail comparable to the front façade, with consistent design treatment, including but not limited to, comparable color palette, signs, rooflines, and materials. Please submit elevations of all four sides of the proposed building. Please design side and rear building façades with attention to architectural character and detail comparable to the front façade. 2. The NSNP and the Design Guidelines Manual call for dumpster areas be screened with six-foot-high, masonry walls and landscaping. Please note height of wall around dumpster/service area. 3. The NSNP and the Design Guidelines Manual state that the use of vegetation should be used within the parking areas to reduce heat build-up. Please provide vegetation islands, which include shade trees, within the parking areas. The NSNP calls for screen walls along the frontages of major streets be designed with decorative materials such as tile, or brick; or cover walls with coarse-textured material such as stucco or plaster and promotes the use of colors found predominantly in the natural desert landscape. Please provide a wall detail and call out the color to be applied. The General Plan and Design Guidelines Manual state that signs should be incorporated with and improve the aesthetics of a development. Plans also have policies that promote signage that is clear, but is not the dominant feature of the development. Please provide the desired sign package for the proposed use. Please call out pedestrian circulation, particularly from the north and east parking areas |
| 11/07/2006 | KAROL ARAGONEZ | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Karol Aragonez Planner PROJECT: D06-0041 Tucson Mall Oil Stop Development Plan TRANSMITTAL DATE: November 2, 2006 DUE DATE: November 17, 2006 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is November 16, 2006. 2. Case number D06-0041 has been assigned to this development plan (DP). Please place this number in the right corner of all sheets of the DP, landscape plan, NPPO, and any other associated sheets. DS 2-05.2.2.B.2 3. Please provide the percentage of expansion since the initial DP for the mall. This is to verify that the cumulative expansions of the mall have not exceeded twenty-five (25) percent, which would trigger full code compliance for the entire mall. 4. Please provide the site boundary information, including bearing in degrees, minutes, and seconds, with a basis for bearing noted, together with distances. DS 2-05.2.3.A 5. Please draw all existing easements on the plan along with recordation information, location, width, and purpose. If an easement is no longer in use and scheduled to be vacated or has been abandoned, so indicate. If none exist provide response to reviewer's comments. Also if easements are purposed please draw, dimension and label as to their purpose and whether they will be public or private. If none exist provide response to reviewer's comments. DS 2-05.2.3.B & DS 2-05.2.4.G 6. On sheet 3 of 5 please add the zoning of the property that is diagonal across the intersection from the project site (O-3). On sheet 2 of 5 zoning provided across Wetmore Road is incorrectly shown. Please revise. DS 2-05.2.4.B 7. Please add the angled parking detail dimensions and angles "A" (parking angle) and "E" (curb length) as they relate to LUC figure 3.3.7.2 used with Table 3.3.7-I. 8. Please identify and dimension the stacking spaces required for each vacuum bay and the actual location of the vacuum bays of the car wash. Are these shown in front of each bay of the auto repair? Is this where the vacuuming to take place? Vacuum bays are to be clearly shown on the DP. If the three spaces shown are stacking spaces they cannot extend into the required twenty-four (24) foot PAAL. Where is the fourth stacking space as noted in the parking calculations? The minimum length of a stacking space is eighteen (18) feet. Please respond. LUC 3.3.4 Car Wash Automative System & DS 3-05.2.1.C.2.d 9. Please revise the parking calculations to clearly represent the project site. As currently shown the calculations are confusing. Please provide the following: a) Provide two separate columns one showing required number of spaces required and the number of spaces provided for this project. Three (3) bays for auto service and repair would require fourteen (14) motor vehicle parking spaces, nine (9) plus five (5). The car wash would require, based on information provided, four (4) spaces plus one (1) for each vacuum bay for a total of eight (8) required. b) Stacking spaces are not including in the required parking space count for off-street parking. Spaces in service bays, stacking areas, or car wash bays are not considered off-street parking spaces. Please remove and provided revised calculations for off-street parking spaces and provide a separate calculation for stacking spaces. LUC 3.3.3.9 c) Please indicate how many spaces are provided within the project site and how many are distributed within "mall parking areas". It appears that thirty-one (31) spaces are provided, twenty (20) of, which are provided on-site, eleven (11) within surrounding mall parking areas. 10. A minimum setback distance of five (5) feet for a pedestrian refuge area must be maintained between any enclosed structure and a PAAL. The refuge area will contain a four (4) foot wide concrete sidewalk and will be physically separate from the PAAL. DS 2-08.4.1, DS 2-08.4.1.B, & DS 3-03.2.2.B.1 11. Please clarify if this is the first time the adjustment factor for Stone Avenue has been used to reduce parking for the Mall. It appears that the parking was adjusted for Stone on previous development plan CD9-82-48x. 12. Angled parking shown would indicate that the vehicles will only be allowed to access PAALs in a one-way direction. Would the three (3) spaces at the north portion of the site would have to go through the oil change area? Would the twenty (20) spaces south of the car wash have to proceed through the car wash? The handicap space does not appear to be maneuvered in and out of easily to exit the site without going through the service bay. Please explain. As is the these spaces are not usable. 13. Please provide a copy of cross access and parking agreement for the mall as it relates to this site which allows the use of parking and off-street loading and maneuvering. DS 2-05.2.4.P 14. Please indicate the height the handicap signage will be placed. TDOT requires that the sign must be seven (7) feet from bottom of sign to curb. 15. Detectable warnings (truncated domes) are required at access aisles of handicapped motor vehicle parking spaces. The truncated domes shall be installed twenty-four (24) inches minimum in the direction of travel and extend the full width of the curb ramp or flush surface. The domes shall be located so the edge nearest the curb line is six (6) inches to eight (8) inches from the curb line. ANSI 406.12, ANSI 705 16. Within all development, a continuous pedestrian circulation path is required. This path must connect all public access areas of the development. Please show how this out pad connects to the main mall circulation and to the adjacent right-of-ways. There appears to be no connection from this site to the rest of the mall. DS 2-08.3.1 17. All sidewalks will be a minimum of four (4) feet within the site. The sidewalk area adjacent to the bicycle parking appears to be reduced by the car wash structure. DS 2-08.5.1.A 18. Bicycle parking provided on the DP does not meet the requirements of revised DS (Development Standard) 2-09. Per DS 2-09.4.1 Class 2 bicycle parking facilities will be located no more than fifty (50) feet from the main building entrance(s) and will be along the front side of the building as well as along other sides of the building that has an entrance. Bicycle access through the development will be separate from the pedestrian ways. Vehicular access may be used as bicycle access. Bicycle access to a parking facility may cross a pedestrian way at a right angle (DS2-09.3.2). Multiple rack bicycle parking require a minimum thirty (30 inches between outer spaces of posts or racks (DS 2-09.5.1.A). The type of rack proposed does not provide two-point support for bicycles. Please review DS 2-09.8.0 Figure 2 - 7 for acceptable and unacceptable rack designs, Figure 8 for rack location, and Figure 9 for dimensional requirements. Please review the revised DS 2-09 and provide the necessary corrections to the bicycle parking as required. Once changes are provided and reviewed further comments may result. The revised DS may be found on the web at: http://www.tucsonaz.gov/dsd/Codes___Ordinances/DevStd209.pdf 19. Please indicate the location and type of postal service to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements. If mail is to be delivered to an area with a building please state so on the plan. DS 2-05.2.4.V 20. Indicate the locations and types of proposed signs (wall, freestanding, pedestal) to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements and that minimal locational requirements can be met. Also indicate if there are existing billboards on site. Billboards will be required to meet all LUC requirements as stated in LUC Sec. 3.5.4.26. If none exists please state so. DS 2-05.2.4.W & LUC 3.5.4.26 21. All changes, modifications, and/or corrections must be made on all applicable plans including the development plan, landscape plan, and NPPO. Once changes, modifications, and/or corrections are made and reviewed further comments may result. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Karol Aragonez, (520) 791-5550, ext. 1197. KAA S:\zoning review\karol\planning\cdrc\developmentplan\D06-0041dp.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development plan and additional requested documents. |
| 11/08/2006 | SUZANNE BOHNET | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | November 8, 2006 D06-0041 Tucson Mall Oil Stop: Development Plan 121 E. Wetmore Rd. Reviewer: Suzanne Bohnet, CFM Engineering Associate Development Services Dept. Comments: 1. Provide estimated quantities of cut and fill in cubic yards, listed separately, even if that quantity is zero. 2. Keynote 10 is not called out on the Development Plan. 3. Keynote 8 appears to call out the handicapped access ramp from the parking area to the sidewalk, however Detail C/1 does not show a ramp detail to support that assumption. Additionally, Standard Detail 209 is not a "depressed vertical curb". Please clarify. 4. Ensure that all necessary recordation of easements has been completed prior to the approval of the Development Plan and add the appropriate Docket and Page where necessary. 5. The finished grades on the east side of the proposed development show drainage going towards the building, rather than positive drainage away from the building. Please provide a cross-section detail from the proposed building to Stone Ave. to show positive drainage. 6. There appears to be a potential typographical error in the listing of the southern most finished grade on the eastern side of the proposed car wash. The northeastern corner is called out at 18.5' and the southeastern corner is called out at 17.5'. Please clarify if there is a one-foot difference between the two corners and, if not, please correct the error. However, if this is not an error, please explain how stormwater drainage will be prevented from entering the car wash and subsequent sewer drainage system. The finished grades provided do not conclusively establish this will not happen. 7. Call out the existing sidewalk in the right-of-ways. 8. Provide the sight visibility triangles (SVTs) for the intersection of Stone Ave. and Wetmore Rd. 9. Please provide the fully dimensioned refuse areas on the Development Plan, per D.S. 2-05.2.4.T. |
| 11/09/2006 | FRODRIG2 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Approved | Transportation Information for Rezoning, Subdivision, and Development Requests Delivered to: Date Delivered: Development Services - City of Tucson 11/7/2006 Case Number Project Name Average number of daily trips (ADT) forecasted as a result of the proposed development This information is provided for jurisdictional planning departments to assess the impact of the proposed residential or commercial development on surrounding traffic patterns and roads. If the forecasted daily traffic exceeds 500 average daily trips, a more detailed analysis is also provided. D06-0041 44 Tucson Mall Oil Stop Pima Association of Governments Sandra C. Holland, Data Services 177 N. Church Ave., Suite 405, Tucson, Arizona 85701-1127 (520) 792-1093 FAX (520) 620-6981 |
| 11/14/2006 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Add the CDRC case number and any related case numbers to the landscape and native plant preservation plans. DS 2-07.2.1.B 2) A vehicular use area must be provided with post barricades or wheel stop curbing designed to prevent parked vehicles from extending beyond the property lines; damaging adjacent landscaping, walls, or buildings per DS 3-05.2.3.C. Revise the plans as necessary to clarify that sufficient barriers will be installed at all required locations. 3) The loading area is required to be screened from the street per LUC table 3.7.2-I. Revise the development plan and landscape plan to provide the required 6' high masonry wall. 4) The area between the right-of-way line and sidewalk and the area between the sidewalk and the curb, if not covered with vegetation, shall be covered with an appropriate inorganic ground cover, such as decomposed granite. Revise the plans to clarify compliance. LUC 3.7.2.4.A.4 5) Revise the landscape plan to include the location and purpose of utility easements and other easements. DS 2-07.2.2.E.1 6) Show and identify existing plants to remain in place on the landscape plan. Existing trees along Stone Avenue are to identified by genus and species if they are used to meet the landscape border canopy tree requirement. DS 2-07.2.2.A.1.e 7) Revise the landscape plan to show the extent of supplementary irrigation in each planting area provided by water harvesting methods. Show the amount and disposition of flow and indicate drainage points from buildings and paved areas. DS 2-07.2.2.C Refer to: http://dot.tucsonaz.gov/stormwater/downloads/2006WaterHarvesting.pdf for guidance. 8) Show all proposed screen walls on the development plans. DS 2-07. 9) Note the height of the existing wall and proposed grade of the landscape area and vehicular use area at the intersection. Screen walls along a street frontage must be located on the development side of the street landscape border so that they do not obstruct the view of the street landscape border from the street. LUC 3.7.3.2.B 10) Vegetation or structures higher than thirty (30) inches must be located outside of the sight visibility triangle. Show the svt's on the landscape plans. 11) Revise the landscape plan general notes to correct errors: existing zoning, gross area of site, note 8 regarding native plant preservation and mitigation. 12) Revise the landscape plan to indicate the dimensions and square footage of tree planters in vehicular use areas. DS 2-07.2.2.A.2.e, LUC 3.7.2.3.A.1.c RESUBMITTAL OF ALL PLANS IS REQUIRED |
| 11/16/2006 | FRODRIG2 | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Approved | No comment |
| 11/16/2006 | JOSE ORTIZ | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Denied | November 16, 2006 ACTIVITY NUMBER: D06-0041 PROJECT NAME: Tucson Mall Oil Shop PROJECT ADDRESS: 4420 N Stone Avenue PROJECT REVIEWER: Jose E. Ortiz PE, Traffic Engineer Resubmittal Required: Traffic Engineering does not recommend approval of the Development Plan; therefore a revised Development Plan is required for re-submittal. The following items must be revised or added to the plat. 1. Include a response letter with the next submittal that states how all comments have been addressed. 2. If applicable, dimension the width of all ingress/egress points (Tucson City Code, Chapter 25, section 39 & 40) 3. This plan does not seem to take into account the future intersection widening on Wetmore Road and Stone Avenue in accordance with the Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) maps. According to the MS&R maps Wetmore Road will require 150' of right of way (75' from centerline) to accommodate future intersection widening. 4. Illustrate/label the location of the future/existing right of way along Stone Avenue and Wetmore Road. (DS 2-03.2.3.D) 5. If applicable, a permit or a private improvement agreement will be necessary for any work performed within the Right-of-way. Contact Permits and Codes at (520) 791-5100 for permit information. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-4259 x305 or Jose.Ortiz@tucsonaz.gov |
| 11/17/2006 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: D06-0041 TUCSON MALL OIL STOP/DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE: 11/17/06 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: Delete 121 E. Wetmore Road. The address assigned to the Christmas Tree lot (prior to this project) is 4413 N. Stone Av. Label dimensions of this project on Sheet 3. Provide copy of recorded lot split prior to final approval. Correct 42-23 to 43-23 on Location Map. es |
| 11/21/2006 | PGEHLEN1 | TUCSON WATER NEW AREA DEVELOPMENT | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 11/21/2006 | ED ABRIGO | PIMA COUNTY | ASSESSOR | Passed | |
| 11/21/2006 | ROBERT YOUNG | PIMA COUNTY | PIMA CTY - DEV REVIEW | Passed | |
| 11/21/2006 | TIM ROWE | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | December 13, 2006 To: Eduardo Gonzalez, Rick Engineering Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Project Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department ____________________________________ From: Michael J.Harrington (520-740-6579), representing the Pima County Departments of Wastewater Management and Environmental Quality Subject: Tucson Mall, Oil Stop Development Plan - 1st Submittal (revised) D06-041 The proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. This letter has been revised to incorporate guidance form Tim Rowe, P. E., of the PCWMD Development Services Section. This project will be tributary to the Roger Road Wastewater Treatment Facility via the South Rillito - West (North Line) Interceptor. Obtain a letter from the PCWMD's Development Services Section, written within the past 90 days, stating that treatment and conveyance system capacity for the project is available in the downstream public sewerage system and provide a copy of that letter to this office. The required form to request such a letter may be found at: http://www.pima.gov/wwm/forms/docs/CapResponseRequest.pdf. The development plan for this project cannot be approved until a copy of this letter has been received by this office. All Sheets: Add the development plan case number, D06-041, to the title block of each sheet. This number should be shown larger or bolder than any cross reference numbers. No wastewater review fees will be charged for sheets where this is the only required revision. Sheet 4: Public sewer assets, adjacent to this project, are shown on this development plan and are not adequately identified. Revise the site plan so that: All public sewer elements (manholes), that are located on this project or are less than 100’ from this project, are identified with the wastewater plan and IMS numbers. The IMS numbers are the sewer element identification numbers that can be found on the PCWMD Maps and Records (5th floor) basemaps or on PCWMD and PCDOT MapGuide internet websites. Note that manhole 9811-13A and the existing 6” stubout were constructed under plan number G-89-99. Sheet 2: Rick Engineering is proposing to connect the new private BCS to an existing 6” private sewer stub-out. A manhole will be required at this point, as there is a change in alignment and grade at the proposed point of connection, and this new manhole will be located within the City of Tucson’s Wetmore Road right of way. The Pima County Wastewater Management Department will not accept the existing 6” private sewer stub-out and the new manhole into the public sewer system, as their diesign standards require all new public sewers to be constructed of 8” pipe. Therefore, to make this connection you will need to obtain written authorization from the City of Tucson (COT) Department of Transportation, to construct the new private manhole within the COT’s right of way. This office will not be able to approve this point and method of location to the public sewer system (and therefore the development plan) until it receives a copy of this authorization. This office will require a revised set of bluelines, and a response letter, addressing these comments. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. The PCWMD Industrial Wastewater Control Group will likely require an oil and sand interceptor and inspection manhole to be provided at an automotive service and car wash facility. Contact PCWMD prior to your next submittal and incorporate any grit/sand manhole requirements. Pima County Code Title 13.20.030.A.2 requires that a wastewater review fee be paid for each submittal of the development plan. The fee for the first submittal is $166 plus $50 per sheet. For the second submittal, the review fee is $50 per sheet. For all subsequent submittals, the review fee is $39 per sheet. The next submittal of this project will be the second (2nd) submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $50.00 (made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER) must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. If you have any questions regarding the above mentioned comments, please contact me at the telephone number shown under my signature on the first page of this letter CC: Project File |
| 11/24/2006 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | DATE: November 22, 2006 TO: Ferne Rodriguez, Development Services FROM: Glenn Hicks Parks and Recreation 791-4873 ext. 215 Glenn.Hicks@tucsonaz.gov CC: SUBJECT: D06-0041 Tucson Mall Oil Stop: Development Plan(10-20-06) Staff has no comments. |
| 12/15/2006 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES December 15, 2006 Eduardo Gonzalez Rick Engineering Company, Inc. 1745 East River Road, Suite 101 Tucson, Arizona 85718 Subject: D06-0041 Tucson Mall Oil Stop Development Plan Dear Eduardo: Your submittal of October 20, 2006 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 10 Copies Revised Development Plan (TEP, DUPD, ESD, Zoning, Engineering, Landscape, Traffic, Addressing, Wastewater, DSD) 5 Copies Revised Landscape Plan (DUPD, Zoning, Engineering, Landscape, DSD) 2 Copies Building Elevations (DUPD, DSD) 2 Copies Cross Access and Parking Agreement (Zoning, DSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 791-5608 extension 1179. Sincerely, Patricia Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 322-6956 dp-resubmittal |