Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: REVISION - DEV PLAN
Permit Number - D06-0040
Review Name: REVISION - DEV PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08/27/2008 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 08/28/2008 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 08/29/2008 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC SITE | REVIEW | Denied | 29 AUGUST 2008 D06-0040/STAYBRIDGE SUITES/REVISION-DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEWED BY RON BROWN ACCESSIBLE REVIEW 2006 IBC/ICC 117.1 DENIED: SEE COMMENTS BELOW I. SHEET 1 of 4: A. DENOTE GOVERNING ACCESSIBILITY CODE; 2006 IBC/ICC 117.1 FOR PRIVATE PROPERTY, DENOTE RIGHT OF WAY ACCESSIBILITY STANDARDS; COT DOT STANDARDS FOR CURB RAMPS AT DRIVE WAYS. II. SHEET 2 of 4: A. PROVIDE AND IDENTIFY ACCESSIBLE ROUTE THROUGHOUT SITE TO ALL BUILDING ENTRANCES AND EXITS AND PARKING FACILITIES, PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY WALKWAY AS PER 2066 IBC, SECTION 1104 AND ICC 117.1, SECTION 402. B. NOTE 17: DETAIL I/4 IS NOT RELATIVE TO THE EXISTING LAYOUTS AS SHOWN. PROVIDE ACCESSIBILITY AS PER DOT REQUIREMENTS. C. NOTE 50: CURB RAMP REFERENCES NEED TO BE AS PER 2006 IBC/1CC 117.2, SECTION 406. D. PROVIDE LARGE SCALE DETAIL OF POOL AND CABANA AREA SHOWING ALL ACCESSIBLE ROUTES, DIMENSIONS AND SLOPES AS PER ICC 117.1, SECTIONS 400, ACCESSIBLE ROUTES. III. SHEETS 4 of 4: A. DETAIL "I": HAVE BOTTOM EDGE OF RAMP OFF THE RADII OF THE SIDEWALK ARCH. IF CURB IS 6", MAKE RAMP 6' LONG, 1:12 SLOPE. B. DETAILS "J" AND "D": 1. ALL SURFACES SLOPES NOT TO EXCEED 2% (SECTION 502.5). 2. MOVE PARKING SIGNS TO THE BACKSIDE OF THE CURB. 3. PROVIDE A 4' WIDE ACCESSIBLE ROUTE BEHIND THE DETECTABLE WARNING AT DETAIL "J". 4. PLEASE CLARIFY NOTE ABOUT COUNTER SLOPES OF ADJOINING GUTTERS BEING 1:20. DON'T UNDERSTAND. C. DETAIL "H": 1. $532.00 FINE TO BE NOTED ON SIGN. 2. PROVIDE "VAN ACCESSIBLE" ON THE POLE. END OF REVIEW |
| 09/09/2008 | JASON GREEN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | DATE: September 4, 2008 SUBJECT: Staybridge Suites Revised Development Plan- 1st Engineering Review TO: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager LOCATION: 2705 E Executive Dr, T15S R14E Sec17, Ward 5 REVIEWERS: Jason Green, CFM ACTIVITY: D06-0040 SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Development Services Department has received the revised development plan. Engineering Division has reviewed the submitted development plan and recommends conditional approval at this time. The following items need to be addressed prior to Mylar submittal: DEVELOPMENT PLAN: 1) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.W: Revise the 'revised' development plan to show the proposed sign footprint per the last approved development plan or revise keynote #39 to state "No signs are allowed within the Sight Visibility Triangles". The dimensions do not have to be exact; however it does need to clearly show that the sign will not be constructed within the SVTs. 2) Any significant changes required by other City of Tucson Review Departments will require a re-review of the revised development plan. If the changes from those Departments are to be made on the Mylar provides a comprehensive response letter clearly stating what revisions were made and where on the plan the changes took place. DRAINAGE REPORT: 3) Provide a Drainage addendum or letter that discusses the revised development plan to ensure that all aspects of the proposed drainage solution are still applicable and functions as designed. GRADING PLAN: 4) DS Sec.11-01.2.1: For future reference a revised grading permit will be required for this project. A grading permit may not be issued prior to development plan approval. 5) Please ensure the grading plan is consistent with the revised development plan, Drainage Report, and Geotechnical Report. Grading standards may be accessed at: http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/DevStandsTOC.pdf. GENERAL COMMENTS: Please provide the Final development plan Mylar for review and approval and a revised drainage addendum that address the comments provided above. Include a comprehensive response letter addressing in detail responses to all of the above comments. Further comments may be generated upon resubmittal of the development plan Mylar and drainage report reviews. For any questions or to schedule a meeting call me at 837-4929. Jason Green, CFM Senior Engineer Associate Engineering Division Development Services |
| 09/09/2008 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 09/10/2008 | CDRC1 | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | September 9, 2008 To: Darren Watson Kimley-Horn & Associates Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department ____________________________________ From: Tom Porter, Sr. CEA (520-740-6579), representing the Pima County Departments of Wastewater Management and Environmental Quality Subject: Staybridge Suites Development Plan -4th Submittal D06-0040 The proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. 1. We have sent to your office via e-mail, a .pdf file containing a Sewer Service Agreement for the proposed number of wastewater fixture units. Three originals will need to be printed out from this file for notarized signatures by the Owner of Record. The three signed originals of the Agreement must be returned to this office in order to satisfy the necessary requirements needed to approve the Mylars of the DP . Subject to the above, the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality and Wastewater Management Department hereby approve the above referenced submittal of the . The required revision(s) may be shown on the Mylars. Please note the following: Approval of the above referenced submittal does not authorize the construction of public or private sewer collection lines, or water distribution lines. Prior to the construction of such features, a Construction Authorization (Approval To Construct) may need to be obtained from the Pima County Environmental Quality. Also, air quality activity permits must be secured by the developer or prime contractor from the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality before constructing, operating or engaging in an activity which may cause or contribute to air pollution. If you have any questions regarding the above mentioned comments, please contact me . The next submittal of this project will be the fifth(5th) submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $39.00 (made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER) must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. |
| 09/10/2008 | ANDY VERA | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | ES approves of this DP as long as the following conditons are met: 1. Label trash enclosure so identifiable and in conjunction with keynote 21. 2. Vertical curb/island directly west of enclosure (southside) needs to be increased to a minimum 25 ft radius to allow adequate manueverabiltiy for collection vehicle to position itself to and from enclosure area. 3. Sheet 4, Double Dumpster Enclosure - Change spacing of rear post barricades/bollards from 6.7 ft to 4 ft for each container service area and adjust other diemnsions accordingly. Please provide corrections as noted above. If you have any questions you may contact Andy Vera at (520) 791-5543 ext 1212 or e-mail: Andy.Vera@tucsonaz.gov |
| 09/15/2008 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: David Rivera Principal Planner PROJECT: D06-0040 Staybridge Suites Development Plan (revised) TRANSMITTAL DATE: September 15, 2008 DUE DATE: September 11, 2008 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. The revised development plan has been reviewed by zoning. The following item must be addressed. While all the changes made to the site are consistent with the development criteria and development standards the only item that may not have been addressed correctly is the AEZ. It appears that in lowering the height of the building the length of the building was increased to the west side of the project site. Based on the AEZ overlay maps a portion of the North West corner of the building is now in the AEZ 55 height limitation. It is important to draw and label the AEZ AHD height lines that affect this site. The revised development plan cannot be approved until the requested information has been added to the plan and reviewed. To correctly locate the AHD lines on your drawing you must contact DUPD for assistance in locating the lines and the reference points used to draw them on the City AEZ maps. Once the AHD lines have been drawn on the development plan, set up an appointment with me to go over the findings and any revisions necessary. Provide documentation from DUPD relative to the AHD lines. I am willing to look over the plan prior to re-submittal to CDRC. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call David Rivera, (520) 791-5608. DGR C:\planning\cdrc\developmentplan\D060040revdp.doc |
| 09/16/2008 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES September 16, 2008 Dave Martin, P.E. Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 1860 East River Road, #100 Tucson, Arizona 85750 Subject: D06-0040 Staybridge Suites Revised Development Plan Dear Dave: Your submittal of August 28, 2008 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 6 Copies Revised Development Plan (ADA, Zoning, ESD, Wastewater, Engineering, DSD) 3 Copies Revised NPPO Plan (Zoning, Engineering, DSD) 2 Copies Drainage Addendum or Letter (Engineering, DSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4919. Sincerely, Patricia Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 615-9292 |