Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - DEV PLAN
Permit Number - D06-0038
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - DEV PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 05/11/2007 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 05/15/2007 | FRODRIG2 | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Approv-Cond | May 15, 2007 To: W.K. Walker, P.E. Darling Environmental & Surveying Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Project Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department ____________________________________ From: Tom Porter (520-740-6579), representing the Pima County Departments of Wastewater Management and Environmental Quality Subject: Blythe Property, 6279 E. Hawthorne Street Development Plan – 2nd Submittal D06-0038 The proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. Sheet 1: Revise the site plan so that: The existing sewer line is clearly shown in the legend as existing and public or private. The rim and invert elevations for the cleanout IMS #8933*20 need to be shown. Also any cleanouts on site need to be shown w/rim and invert elevations. The HCS should be shown as private and the pipe size/material and slope need to be shown. There should be a different line-type for the HCS verses the existing sewer line. Also the sewer plan # for the existing sewer line and pipe size should be shown and remove City of Tucson under the IMS # , all sewer lines are owned by the county. Subject to the above, the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality and Wastewater Management Department hereby approve the above referenced submittal of the development plan. The required revision(s) may be shown on the Mylars. Please note the following: Approval of the above referenced submittal does not authorize the construction of public or private sewer collection lines, or water distribution lines. Prior to the construction of such features, a Construction Authorization (Approval To Construct) may need to be obtained from the Pima County Environmental Quality. Also, air quality activity permits must be secured by the developer or prime contractor from the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality before constructing, operating or engaging in an activity which may cause or contribute to air pollution. If you have any questions regarding the above mentioned comments, please contact me at the telephone number shown under my signature on the first page of this letter CC: Project File |
| 05/18/2007 | PATRICIA GILBERT | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | TO: Patricia Gehlen; CDRC Coordinator DATE: May 18, 2007 SUBJECT: Engineering review of the Blythe Property Development Plan. The activity number is D06-0038. SUMMARY: The Development Plan and Drainage Report were received by Engineering on May 11th, 2007. Engineering has reviewed the received items and does not recommend approval of the Development Plan. RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: DEVELOPMENT PLAN The next submittal must address the following items: DEVELOPMENT PLAN 1. The development plan must clearly show on the plan, Rezoning Condition No. 6 must extend to the west edge of the property. The submitted development plan does not clearly show on the plan view the alley is going to be paved. The plan view clearly shows the edge of pavement at the ingress/egress. However the plan does not indicate new pavement to the edge of the west property line. Revise the development plan to indicate a proposed paved 24' alley to meet Rezoning Condition No. 6. 2. Call out on the sheet 1 the new 5' block wall located adjacent to the alley. |
| 05/24/2007 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Approved | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: D06-0038 BLYTHE PROPERTY/REVISED DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE: May 24, 2007 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and we hereby approve this project. NOTE: Submit a 24 x 36 Reverse Reading Double Matte Photo Mylar of approved Development Plan to City Planning. Signed and dated Mylar will be forwarded to Pima County Addressing prior to assignment of addresses. 2.) All addresses will need to be displayed per Pima County Address Standards at the time of final inspection. jg |
| 05/31/2007 | JOSE ORTIZ | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | |
| 06/01/2007 | KAROL ARAGONEZ | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Karol Aragonez Planner PROJECT: D06-0038 Blythe Property Development Plan TRANSMITTAL DATE: May 31, 2007 DUE DATE: June 11, 2007 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. Please provide a separate response letter detailing compliance with rezoning conditions. DS 2-05.2.1.K & DS 2-05.2.4.U 2. Please provide as general notes "The project is designed to meet the overlay zone criteria of Sec. 2.8.3, Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Setback Zone". DS 2-05.2.2.B.1, 3, 10, & 11 3. The accessible ramp and bicycle ramp provided cannot be located within the access aisle. They shall be located so they do not project into vehicular traffic lanes, parking spaces, or parking access aisles. The bicycle ramp is not necessary and can be removed. Please revise placement of handicap ramp. ANSI 406 4. Please clarify if the stoop is elevated from the sidewalk area. All sidewalks are required to be a minimum of four (4) feet wide and be installed to avoid any obstruction that decreases the minimum width to less than four (4) feet. DS 2-08.5.1.A 5. A minimum setback distance of five (5) feet for a pedestrian refuge area must be maintained between any enclosed structure and PAAL. The refuge area may have a roof for shade, provided it contains a sidewalk and pedestrian access which is unobstructed and is set back one (1) foot from the PAAL. Please provide dimensions of the pedestrian refuge area along the north side of the building to verify that this criterion has been met. DS 3-05.2.2.B.1 6. The proposed sign shown on the landscape plan appears to be located within the sight visibility triangle (SVT) for Hawthorne Street. Clear lines of sight will be maintained along all streets and driveways to assure the safety of motorist and pedestrians. Lines of sight cannot be obscured between thirty (30) inches and six (6) feet through the SVT. Signage must either conform to these requirements or be relocated outside of the SVT. DS 3-01.5.1.A.1 If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Karol Aragonez, (520) 791-5550, ext. 74960. KAA S:\zoning review\karol\planning\cdrc\developmentplan\D06-0038dpr.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development plan and additional requested documents. |
| 06/04/2007 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. The area between the right-of-way line and sidewalk and the area between the sidewalk and the curb, if not covered with vegetation, shall be covered with an appropriate inorganic ground cover, such as decomposed granite. Revise the plans to clarify compliance in all areas. LUC 3.7.2.4.A.4 2. Resolve the conflict between the screening proposed on the development plan and the screening proposed on the landscape plan. A 5' masonry wall is required. LUC Table 3.7.2-I 3. A minimum distance of two (2) feet must be maintained between a PAAL and any wall, screen, or other obstruction. DS 3-05.2.2.B.3 . Revise the plans at the alley entrance. 4. Add the Development Plan case number along with the rezoning case number and any other relevant case numbers to the Landscape Plan. DS 2-07.2.1 Resubmittal of the landscape and development plan is required. The NPP application has been approved. |
| 06/12/2007 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Denied | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT D06-0038 Blythe Property ( ) Tentative Plat () Development Plan () Landscape Plan ( ) Revised Plan/Plat ( ) Board of Adjustment ( ) Other CROSS REFERENCE: C9-05-18 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Sewell-Hudlow Neighborhood Plan GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: N/A COMMENTS DUE BY: June 11, 2007 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: ( ) No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment ( ) Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions ( ) RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies () See Additional Comments Attached ( ) No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: () Resubmittal Required: ( ) Tentative Plat () Development Plan () Landscape Plan ( ) Other REVIEWER: J. Hershenhorn 791-4505 DATE: 6/6/07 D06-0038 Blythe Property Devlopment Plan Thank you for listing the rezoning conditions on the Development Plan (DP). Regarding detail 6, the typical site wall detail (DP sheet 2/4), please remove the word “max” so that the wall height is 5’-0”. Please show the wall openings at the base on detail #6. If the openings will not be in all the new walls, indicate which walls will have the openings. Please indicate on detail 6 that the walls will be constructed of or painted with graffiti-resistant materials (rezoning condition #11). Please indicate on wall detail #6 what decorative wall treatment will be used, per rezoning condition #11. Regarding the screening walls, the information shown on the DP and the Landscape Plan must be consistent. |
| 06/12/2007 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES June 12, 2007 W.K. Walker P.E. W.K. Walker P.E. 2919 East Beverly Drive Tucson, Arizona 85716 Subject: D06-0038 Blythe Property Development Plan Dear Mr. Walker: Your submittal of May 11, 2007 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 6 Copies Revised Development Plan (Zoning, DUPD, Landscape, Engineering, Wastewater, DSD) 5 Copies Revised Landscape Plan (Zoning, DUPD, Landscape, Engineering, DSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 791-5608 extension 1179. Sincerely, Patricia Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: dp-resubmittal |
| 06/12/2007 | CDRC1 | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Approved | >>> Jim Stoyanoff 06/12/2007 12:27 PM >>> Easement has been recorded no further comments. |