Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Permit Number - D06-0038
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 09/15/2006 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 09/18/2006 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 09/21/2006 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | NO COMMENT D06-0038 W.K. WALKER PE BLYTHE PROPERTY -------------------------------------------------------- Confidentiality and Nondisclosure Notice: This email transmission and any attachments are intended for use by the person(s)/entity(ies) named above and may contain confidential/privileged information. Any unauthorized use, disclosure or distribution is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by e-mail, and delete or destroy all copies plus attachments. |
| 09/25/2006 | KAROL ARAGONEZ | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Karol Aragonez Planner PROJECT: D06-0038 Blythe Property Development Plan TRANSMITTAL DATE: September 22, 2006 DUE DATE: October 13, 2006 COMMENTS: Please review Development Standard 2-05 for preparation of a Development Plan (DP). Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is September 14, 2006. 2. Please revise the project location in the upper right corner of the development plan (DP) as follows: a) The map should cover approximately one (1) square mile , be drawn at a minimum scale of 3"=1mile. b) Show the subject property approximately centered within the one (1) square mile. c) Identify major streets within the square mile area. d) Provide section, township and range; section corners; north arrow; and scale. DS 2-05.2.1.D 3. To save space, please remove the title listed in the upper right corner. Please add the rezoning case number C9-05-18 in the lower right corner of the DP next to the title block. Add all conditions of rezoning to the DP and provide a separate response letter detailing compliance with rezoning conditions. DS 2-05.2.1.K & DS 2-05.2.4.U 4. Please list the names, addresses, and telephone numbers of the primary property owner of the site and the developer of the project. DS 2-05.2.2.A.1 5. Case number D06-0038 has been assigned to this development plan (DP). Please place this number in the right corner of all sheets of the development plan, landscape plan, NPPO, and any other associated sheets. DS 2-05.2.2.B.2 6. Please provide as general notes: a) "Existing zoning is R-1, Proposed zoning is O-2" b) "The proposed use of the property is Administrative and Professional Office" c) "The project is designed to meet the overlay zone criteria of Sec. 2.8.3, Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Setback Zone" d) "The gross area of the site is (in square feet and acreage)" DS 2-05.2.2.B.1, 3, 10, & 11 7. Provide site boundary information, including bearing in degrees, minutes, and seconds, with basis for bearing noted, together with distance in feet, to hundredths of a foot. DS 2-05.2.3.A 8. Please draw all existing easements on the plan along with recordation information, location, width, and purpose. If an easement is no longer in use and scheduled to be vacated or has been abandoned, so indicate. If none exist provide response to reviewer's comments. Also if easements are purposed please draw, dimension and label as to their purpose and whether they will be public or private. If none exist provide response to reviewer's comments. DS 2-05.2.3.B & DS 2-05.2.4.G 9. Provide the recordation data, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks (from street centerline) for both existing and future right-of-way. DS 2-05.2.3.C & DS 2-05.2.4.f 10. Please provide the existing zoning classification for the property on north side of Wilmot Road. DS 2-05.2.4.B 11. Please dimension the back-up spur. The spur will be a minimum of three (3) in depth, will have a three (3) foot radii, and will have a wheel barrier to prevent encroachment onto the sidewalk. If the sidewalk is elevated please indicate so on the DP. A minimum distance of three (3) feet will be provided between the back-up spur and any wall. DS 2-05.2.2.D 12. Please provide the parking calculations on the DP. Required parking for office is one (1) space per every two hundred- (200) sq. ft. of GFA. Parking calculations cannot be determined at this review since GFA has not been provided on the DP. These calculations should include both standard and accessible parking calcs. Provide a typical parking detail for both a standard and accessible parking space. The accessible parking space should include detail of required signage. LUC 3.3.4 Commercial Services Use Group, DS 2-05.2.4.P & ANSI 13. Please add to note for curb access ramps on Wilmot Road that the ramp will include truncated domes. All accessible curb ramps shall have truncated domes installed that shall be twenty-four (24) inches minimum in the direction of travel and extend the full width of the curb ramp or flush surface. The domes shall be located so the edge nearest the curb line is six (6) inches to eight (8) inches from the curb line. ANSI 406.12, ANSI 705 14. Please provide an alley cross section indicating Engineering requirements. 15. Per rezoning condition 6 the alley is to be paved from the Wilmot Road to the western property boundary line. Please extend pavement to meet this requirement. C9-05-19 Condition 6. 16. Please provide recordation documents for the alley dedication or alley easement. Add docket and page number to the DP when complete. Please verify with Engineering concerning this process. 17. Please indicate on the DP the required and proposed setbacks for the site. I.e. "Required setback from R-1 zoned property is 10 feet or 3/4 the height of the exterior building wall, whichever is greatest, Provided 10.3 feet". 18. Please provide all calculations as required by development designator "27" a) Site area required (0), Site area provided____ b) Maximum allowed Floor Area Ratio (FAR) 0.50, Proposed FAR ____ c) Maximum building height allowed (26 feet), Proposed building height _____ LUC 3.2.3.2.B 19. Please provide as a note the square footage of each commercial structure on site, it's dimensions, and heights. This includes the existing house and storage shed. It does not include the patio area and old carport. Remove square footage calculations listed on DP (one-story house sq. footage, total to be enclosed, and total to be enclosed). Remove the carport designation from the plan (no longer used as such) and re-label as a portico. Note: GFA that is 1,500 or greater will require an off-street loading zone twelve (12) feet by thirty-five (35) feet. DS 2-05.2.4.M & N 20. Please dimension all sidewalks on site. Minimum width required is four (4) feet and will be installed to avoid any obstruction, which decreases the minimum width to less than four (4) feet. DS 2-08.5.1.A 21. Please dimension all sidewalks on the DP. Minimum sidewalk width on-site is four (4) feet. DS 2-08.5.1.A 22. Please clearly identify the location of all sidewalks on the DP. It is not clear if the sidewalk extends along the east side of the building connecting to the sidewalk leading to Wilmot Road. 23. As a note, required minimum sidewalk width for non-MS&R streets is five (5) feet. The sidewalk along Hawthorne may be reduced by the applicant. DS 3-01.3.3.A 24. A minimum setback distance of five (5) feet for a pedestrian refuge area must be maintained between any enclosed structure and PAAL. The refuge area may have a roof for shade, provided it contains a sidewalk and pedestrian access which is unobstructed and is set back one (1) foot from the PAAL. Please provide dimensions of the pedestrian refuge area along the north side of the building to verify that this criterion has been met. DS 3-05.2.2.B.1 25. Please provide the required calculations for bicycle parking spaces. Eight (8) percent of the provided motor vehicle parking is required as bicycle parking. Of that eight (8) percent seventy-five (75) percent is to be Class 1 and twenty-five (25) percent Class 2. Any use providing less than fifty (50) motor vehicle parking spaces may substitute Class 2 for Class 1 spaces. LUC 3.3.4 Commercial Services Use Group & LUC 3.3.7.8.A 26. Please provide a dimensioned detail for class 1 and class 2 bicycle parking spaces. Be aware that that development standard 2-09 has been revised. Once provided and reviewed further comments may result. The revised standards can be found at the DSD web site: http://www.tucsonaz.gov/dsd/Codes___Ordinances/DevStd209.pdf 27. Per DS 2-09.4.1 Class 2 bicycle parking facilities will be located no more than fifty (50) feet from the main building entrance(s) and will be along the front side of the building as well as along other sides of the building that has an entrance. Bicycle access through the development will be separate from the pedestrian ways. Vehicular access may be used as bicycle access. Bicycle access to a parking facility may cross a pedestrian way at a right angle (DS2-09.3.2). Multiple rack bicycle parking require a minimum thirty (30 inches between outer spaces of posts or racks (DS 2-09.5.1.A). Please review the revised DS 2-09 and provide the necessary corrections to the bicycle parking as required. Once changes are provided and reviewed further comments may result. The revised DS may be found on the web at: http://www.tucsonaz.gov/dsd/Codes___Ordinances/DevStd209.pdf 28. Please provide calculations for off-street loading zones. GFA of 1,500 to 50,000 required one (1) off-street loading zone twelve (12) feet by thirty-five (35) feet. Present as: "Off-street loading space required ____, provided ____". (see note 19 above) LUC 3.4.5.5 - Table 5 29. Refuse collection is to meet DS 6-01.0. Please provide a letter from John Clark approving the use of containers instead of a dumpster for this project. DS 2-05.2.4.T 30. Office use adjacent to residential zoning requires both a five (5) high wall and interior landscape border. Please extend the five (5) foot high wall shown on the west side along the entire length of the site to meet this requirement. LUC Table 3.7.2.I 31. In comparing the landscape plan with the DP signage shown on the DP may conflict with plantings shown on the landscape plan. Please verify. 32. All changes, modifications, and/or corrections must be made on all applicable plans including the development plan, landscape plan, and NPPO. Once changes, modifications, and/or corrections are made and reviewed further comments may result. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Karol Aragonez, (520) 791-5550, ext. 1197. KAA S:\zoning review\karol\planning\cdrc\developmentplan\D06-0038dp.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development plan and additional requested documents. |
| 09/25/2006 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | DATE: September 22, 2006 TO: Ferne Rodriguez, Development Services FROM: Glenn Hicks Parks and Recreation 791-4873 ext. 215 Glenn.Hicks@tucsonaz.gov CC: SUBJECT: D06-0038 Blythe Property: Development Plan Staff has no comments. |
| 09/27/2006 | JOSE ORTIZ | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Denied | September 27, 2006 ACTIVITY NUMBER: D06-0038 PROJECT NAME: Blythe Property PROJECT ADDRESS: 6279 E Hawthorne St PROJECT REVIEWER: Jose E. Ortiz PE, Traffic Engineer Resubmittal Required: Traffic Engineering does not recommend approval of the Development Plan; therefore a revised Development Plan is required for re-submittal. The following items must be revised or added to the plan. 1. Include a response letter with the next submittal that states how all comments have been addressed. 2. Label the size of the SVTs (DS 2-05.2.4.R). 3. A Right of Way permit or a private improvement agreement will be necessary for any work performed within the Right-of-way. Contact Permits and Codes at (520) 791-5100 for permit information. 4. Provide a copy of the approved Rezoning case (C9-05-18) to ensure that all traffic conditions have been met. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-4259 x305 or Jose.Ortiz@tucsonaz.gov |
| 10/03/2006 | JCLARK3 | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Approved | * No known landfill within 1000 feet of this development. * Conversion of existing resident to a commercial office. * Approved for APC curbside pickup. APC's are to be placed and remover from the collection area on the day of service. |
| 10/04/2006 | FRODRIG2 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Approved | Transportation Information for Rezoning, Subdivision, and Development Requests Delivered to: Date Delivered: Development Services - City of Tucson 9/21/2006 Case Number Average number of daily trips (ADT) forecasted as a result of the proposed development This information is provided for jurisdictional planning departments to assess the impact of the proposed residential or commercial development on surrounding traffic patterns and roads. If the forecasted daily traffic exceeds 500 average daily trips, a more detailed analysis is also provided. D06-0038 14 Pima Association of Governments Sandra C. Holland, Data Services 177 N. Church Ave., Suite 405, Tucson, Arizona 85701-1127 (520) 792-1093 FAX (520) 620-6981 |
| 10/10/2006 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Denied | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT D06-0038 Blythe Property ( ) Tentative Plat () Development Plan () Landscape Plan ( ) Revised Plan/Plat ( ) Board of Adjustment ( ) Other CROSS REFERENCE: C9-05-18 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Sewell-Hudlow Neighborhood Plan GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: N/A COMMENTS DUE BY: October 13, 2006 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: ( ) No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment ( ) Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions ( ) RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies () See Additional Comments Attached ( ) No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: () Resubmittal Required: ( ) Tentative Plat () Development Plan () Landscape Plan ( ) Other REVIEWER: J. Hershenhorn 791-4505 DATE: 10/6/06 D06-0038 Blythe Property Development Plan Please list out all rezoning conditions on the development plan. To demonstrate compliance with rezoning conditions #11 and #12, please indicate a consistent wall type, height and design along the northeastern edge of the parking area. Sheet 1/4 indicates a 5-foot high block wall, and note #6 calls out 6-inch fence block. Please clarify what “fence block” is. Sheet 2/4 indicates a 30-inch high block wall with wrought iron on top for visibility, and sheet 4/4 indicates that there will be a continuous row of decorative block with openings along the base of wall to accommodate drainage. Regarding the wall referenced in the above comment, please provide a typical wall detail section on the plan, including the construction material and decorative element(s). Please indicate on the plan that the wall will be constructed of or painted with graffiti-resistant material. |
| 10/11/2006 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) The area between the right-of-way line and sidewalk and the area between the sidewalk and the curb, if not covered with vegetation, shall be covered with an appropriate inorganic ground cover, such as decomposed granite. Revise the plans to clarify compliance. LUC 3.7.2.4.A.4 2) The site is required to include screening per along the entire length of the west property line. LUC Table 3.7.2-I. Revise as necessary. 3) A vehicular use area must be provided with post barricades or wheel stop curbing designed to prevent parked vehicles from extending beyond the property lines or paved area; damaging adjacent landscaping, walls, or buildings per DS 3-05.2.3.C. Revise the plans as necessary to provide the required barrier. 4) Resolve the conflict between the screening proposed on the development plan and the screening proposed on the landscape plan. A 5' masonry wall is required. 5) A minimum distance of two (2) feet must be maintained between a PAAL and any wall, screen, or other obstruction. DS 3-05.2.2.B.3 . Revise the plans at the alley entrance. 6) Revise the landscape plan to provide the square footage of the oasis allowance area for the Fraxinus velutina and oasis calculation. DS 2-07.2.2.A.2.b Resubmittal of the landscape and development plan is required. The NPP application is approved. |
| 10/12/2006 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: D06-0038 BLYTHE PROPERTY/DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE: October 11, 2006 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: 1.) Add the following legal description to Title Block: A development of Lot 16, Block 4, Wilmot Desert Estates Resubdivision, Book 10, Page. 4. Delete “6279 E” from Hawthorne and complete the spelling of street on sheet 1. Delete “South Bound” and 23,700 Veh./Day from Wilmot Road. Delete direction from street names on Location Map. Add Section, Township, Range and Section corners to Location Map. jg |
| 10/13/2006 | SUZANNE BOHNET | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | October 13, 2006 D06-0038 Blythe Property: Development Plan 6279 E. Hawthorne St. Reviewer: Suzanne Bohnet, CFM Engineering Associate Development Services Dept. Comments: 1. Include the following General Drainage Notes as outlined in D.S. 2-05.2.2.C.1a and b to the Development Plan: 2. "The developer, any successors and assigns, will hold the City of Tucson, its officers, employees, and agents harmless from any and all claims for damages related to the use of this development as shown hereon, now and in the future, by reason of flooding, flowage, erosion, or damage caused by water, whether surface flood or rainfall." 3. "Drainage will remain in its natural state and will not be altered, disturbed, or obstructed other than as shown on this development plan." 4. Label the site boundary bearings and distances. 5. Provide two physical monuments to establish the Basis of Bearing. 6. Eliminate Sheet 4 of 4, moving the topographic lines and water harvesting note to the Development Plan, and the Surrounding Area Hydrology Map to the Drainage Statement as an appendix. 7. Indicate graphically, where possible, and by notes, in all other instances, compliance with conditions of rezoning. Provide the re-zoning conditions on the Development Plan as Rezoning Conditions, not as Notes. 8. Per Rezoning Condition No. 6, the paving of the alley is to extend to the western edge of the property boundary. Revise the alley paving on the Development Plan. 9. The boundary edge of the property is mislabeled as "Existing Edge of Pavement". 10. Label all boundaries to clearly illustrate what the dimensions are measuring (i.e., from street centerline to existing or proposed curb, back of curb to sidewalk, width of sidewalk, etc.). Provide all dimensions. 11. Provide a separate symbol for the curb and proposed 5' block wall, as it is unclear on the Development Plan. 12. Remove Note No. 11, re-stating it as estimated quantities of cut and fill in cubic yards, listed separately, even if that quantity is zero. Remove the "No Grading Permit Required" comment from the Development Plan. |
| 10/13/2006 | FRODRIG2 | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Denied | Real Estate Division needs the following items: 1.) Legal description and sketch for the north 4 feet of the full width of the subject property to create a 24 foot wide alley per re-zoning condition No# 5. (This is for the alley, right of way easement) 2.) Title report for the subject property dated within 30 days. (To be used for document preparation) |
| 10/20/2006 | PGEHLEN1 | TUCSON WATER NEW AREA DEVELOPMENT | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 10/25/2006 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | 4350 E. Irvington Road, Tucson, AZ 85714 Post Office Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702 WR#169980 September 26, 2006 Dear . Mr. Walker: SUBJECT: Blythe / Hawthorne Property – Rezoning D06-0038 Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the development plan submitted September 15, 2006. There is an existing pole and anchor in conflict with the proposed access area. The pole and anchor proposed location is on private property and TEP will require an easement. All work required to move the existing facilities is billable to the customer. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. In order to apply for electric service, call the New Construction Department at (520) 918-8300. Submit a final set of plans including approved site, offsite and electrical load plans. Include a CD with the AutoCAD version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Your final plans should be sent to: Tucson Electric Power Company Attn: Ms. Mary Boice New Business Project Manager P. O. Box 711 (DB-101) Tucson, AZ 85702 520-917-8732 Please call the area Designer Nancy DiMaria at (520) 918-8267, should you have any questions. Sincerely, Henrietta Noriega Office Specialist Design/Build hn Enclosures cc: Patricia.Gehlen@tucsonaz.gov |
| 10/25/2006 | ED ABRIGO | PIMA COUNTY | ASSESSOR | Passed | |
| 11/01/2006 | TIM ROWE | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | November 1, 2006 To: W.K. Walker, P.E. Darling Environmental & Surveying Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Project Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department ____________________________________ From: Michael J. Harrington (520-740-6579), representing the Pima County Departments of Wastewater Management and Environmental Quality Subject: Blythe Prperty, 6279 E. Hawthorne Street Development Plan - 1st Submittal D06-0038 The proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. This project will be tributary to the Ina Road Water Pollution Control Facility and the Roger Road Wastewater Treatment facility via the Pantano Interceptor. Per written guidance provided by the PCWMD Development Services Section, sufficient conveyance and treatment capacity exists in the downstream public sewerage system for this small project, and a formal capacity response letter from the PCWMD will not be required. All Sheets: Add the development plan case number, D06-0038, to the title block of each sheet. This number should be shown larger or bolder than any cross reference numbers. No wastewater review fees will be charged for sheets where this is the only required revision. Sheet 1: Add a General Note that states: ANY RELOCATION, MODIFICATION, ETC., OF THE EXISTING UTILITIES AND/OR PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS REQUIRED BY THIS DEVELOPMENT WILL BE AT NO EXPENSE TO THE PUBLIC. Sheet 1: Add a General Note that states: ANY WASTEWATER DISCHARGED INTO THE PUBLIC SANITARY SEWERAGE SYSTEM SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE INDUSTRIAL WASTE ORDINANCE (PIMA COUNTY ORDINANCE NO. 1991-140, AS AMENDED). Sheet 1: Add a General Note that states: THIS PROJECT WILL HAVE ______ EXISTING AND______ PROPOSED WASTEWATER FIXTURE UNIT EQUIVALENTS PER TABLE 13.20.045(E)(1) IN PIMA COUNTY CODE 13.20.045(E). And fill in the blanks with the appropriate values. Sheet 1: Add a General Note that states: THE ON-SITE SEWERS ARE EXISTING AND PRIVATE. NO NEW SEWERS ARE PROPOSED. Sheet 1: Revise the site plan so that: All public sewer elements (cleanouts and improvement plan numbers), that are located less than 100’ from this project, are identified. The IMS numbers are the sewer element identification numbers that can be found on the PCWMD Maps and Records (5th floor) basemaps or on PCWMD and PCDOT MapGuide internet websites. And add these elements to the Legend block as appropriate. Sheet 1: Revise the site plan so that it shows: The existing house connection sewer (HCS), from the existing one-story house, to the existing public sewer. This office will require a revised set of bluelines, and a response letter, addressing these comments. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. Pima County Code Title 13.20.030.A.2 requires that a wastewater review fee be paid for each submittal of the development plan. The fee for the first submittal is $166 plus $50 per sheet. For the second submittal, the review fee is $50 per sheet. For all subsequent submittals, the review fee is $39 per sheet. The next submittal of this project will be the second (2nd) submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $50.00 (made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER) must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. If you have any questions regarding the above mentioned comments, please contact me at the telephone number shown under my signature on the first page of this letter CC: Project File |
| 11/02/2006 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES November 2, 2006 W.K. Walker P.E. W.K. Walker P.E. 2919 East Beverly Drive Tucson, Arizona 85716 Subject: D06-0038 Blythe Property Development Plan Dear Mr. Walker: Your submittal of September 15, 2006 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 9 Copies Revised Development Plan (Zoning, Traffic, DUPD, Landscape, Addressing, Real Estate, Engineering, Wastewater, DSD) 5 Copies Revised Landscape Plan (Zoning, DUPD, Landscape, Engineering, DSD) 2 Copies Title Report (Real Estate, DSD) ALTHOUGH ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES HAS APPROVED THIS SITE FOR APC PICK-UP, A DEVELOPMENT STANDARD MODIFICATION REQUEST MUST BE SUBMITTED AN APPROVED PRIOR TO APPROVAL OF THIS DEVELOPMENT PLAN. Should you have any questions, please call me at 791-5608 extension 1179. Sincerely, Patricia Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: dp-resubmittal |