Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Permit Number - D06-0035
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08/18/2006 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 08/21/2006 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 08/22/2006 | KAROL ARAGONEZ | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Karol Aragonez Planner PROJECT: D06-0035 Valencia Car Wash Development Plan TRANSMITTAL DATE: August 18, 2006 DUE DATE: September 18, 2006 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is September 17, 2007. 2. Within the project location map please label the Santa Cruz River West Branch, Indian Agency Road, and label the Tohono O'Odham Nation (not Pima County) to the west of the site. DS 2-05.2.1.D.2 3. Please correct General Note 4 to read "Existing zoning is C-1, Proposed zoning is C-2". The development plan case number D06-0035 has been assigned to this plan. Please place this number in the right corner of all sheets of the development plan, landscape plan, NPPO, and any other associated sheets. DS 2-05.2.2.B.2 4. Please provide a separate response letter detailing compliance with rezoning conditions DS 2-05.2.2.B.6 5. Please provide a copy of the proposed joint use access easement when complete. This along with the abandonment of the existing thirty (30) foot easement will be require prior to DP approval. DS 2-05.2.3.B 6. Please show on the development plan the current type and dimension width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, sidewalks and utility location. DS 2-05.2.3.C & DS 2-05.2.4.D.2 7. The site will require a land split be approved. If this has already been done provide a copy of the approved land split. The identification number and approximate square footage of each lot must be shown on the DP. Please be aware that, if land division occurs and the number of lots falls within the definition of subdivision, a subdivision plat will be required. Lot splits can be processed over the counter at DSD. Please contact David Rivera, Zoning Review at 791-5608. Also the development plan cannot be approved until the land split is processed and approved. DS 2-05.2.4.A 8. Proposed sidewalks shown on the DP do not match proposed location as stipulated in the Majors Streets and Routes Plan (MS&R) for a one hundred fifty- (150) foot right-of-way. Please draw and dimension the future MS&R future sidewalk, and curbs for Valencia Road per the MS&R Plan. Show all future sight visibility triangles for Valencia Road. DS 2-05.2.4.F 9. Please show, label and fully dimension all proposed easements (utility, drainage, access, etc.). Indicate whether they will be public or private. If none are proposed than state that in the response letter. DS 2-05.2.4.G 10. Please provide additional dimensions from the property line to the vacuum/employees area to the property line and edge of PAAL, from the vehicle mud wash area to the property line and edge of PAAL, the access way, and from the edge of the drying area to parking space that is southeast. Measurements to the edge of PAAL will assure that a twenty-four (24) foot PAAL is maintained. DS 2-05.2.4.I & 3-05.2.1.C.1 11. Please provide future sight visibility triangles along with the current triangles shown on the plan. These will be based on the future right-of-way cross section per the MS&R Plan. DS 2-05.2.4.I & DS 2-05.2.4.R 12. Provide as a note the square footage of each structure on the site and provide a note stating the gross floor area (GFA) of the site. GFA is defined as the sum of the horizontal areas of all floors of all buildings, including accessory buildings on a lot measured from the exterior faces of t he exterior walls or from the centerline of walls separating two (2) buildings, and service bays DS 2-05.2.4.M & LUC 6.2.7 13. Please dimension the vacuum/employee area and the customer waiting area DS 2-05.2.4.N 14. Please review the revised Standard Detail 2-09.0 bicycle parking. A minimum of thirty (30) inches is required between outer spaces of posts or racks. A minimum of thirty (30) inches is required between a parallel object or wall measured from the side of the bicycle rack to the parallel object or wall. The bicycle detail provided on the plan must be revised. The revised standard can be found on the DSD web site at: http://www.tucsonaz.gov/dsd/Codes___Ordinances/DevStd209.pdf DS 2-05.2.4.Q & DS 2-09.0 15. Please indicate the location and types of proposed signage (wall, freestanding, pedestal to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements and that minimal locational requirements can be met. Also indicate if there are existing billboards on site. Billboards will be required to meet all LUC requirements as stated in LUC Sec. 3.5.4.26. If none exist then respond so. DS 2-05.2.4.W & LUC 3.5.4.26 16. Please correct General Note 23 and Zoning Code Review notes to indicate proposed use as "Automotive Service and Repair". Remove Retail Automotive Uses and Administrative and Professional Office. 17. Please correct required parking calculations to read "one stacking space for each vacuum bay", not drying space. 18. Please correct provided parking calculations. Numbers should match. Plan shows twenty (17) and eighteen (16). Please decide which number is correct. The plan actually shows eighteen (18) parking spaces provided, with two allocated to handicapped parking. Also correct the stacking number of spaces. It appears that the provided number of stacking spaces for the vacuum bays is nine (9). Please show the location of all stacking spaces on the DP. This will assure that the spaces will not interfere with provided PAALs. The length of a stacking space is eighteen (18) feet in length by eight (8) feet wide. DS 3-05.2.1.2.d 19. Please correct the maximum building height in the Zoning Code Review notes from forty (40) feet to one-story as required by rezoning condition 15. Please place on the DP heights of all structures including canopies on site. C9-05-10 RC 15 20. Per rezoning condition 11-14 the developer is responsible for dedicating a thirty (30) foot wide corridor along the West Branch of the Santa Cruz River Diversion Channel as part of the West Branch Santa Cruz River Linear Park for the length of the subject parcel's frontage. This corridor is to include a twelve (12) foot wide paved path for that entire length and be approved by City and County Parks and Recreation Departments. Please show this requirement on the DP and provide the documentation of recordation of the dedication. C9-05-10 RC 11-14 21. Please provide a detail as to how exterior mechanical equipment is to be screened as per rezoning condition 19. C9-05-10 RC 19 22. Please provide a copy of Airport Disclosure Statement as required by rezoning condition 22 for staff's review. C9-05-10 RC 22 23. Please indicate on the DP if the drying area will have a canopy structure covering it. If it does a minimum distance of one (1) foot must be maintained between the canopy measured from the roof over hang to the edge of PAAL. DS 3-05.2.2.B.2 24. Please provide a detail of the angled parking dimensioning the location of the wheel stop curbing. Please include all applicable dimensions as shown in DS 3-05.6.0 Figure 1 and Table 1.This may be included in detail E on sheet 4 of 4. DS 3-05.2.3.C.2 & DS 3-05.6.0 Figure 1 and Table 1 25. Detail D on sheet 4 of 4 should match the plan view. Ninety (90) degree parking shown in the SE portion of the site abuts a six (6) inch vertical curb and a landscaped area. There is no sidewalk or wall. Please correct. 26. Sidewalks will be provided adjacent and parallel to any PAAL on the side where buildings are located. Sidewalks will connect all areas of the development and must also connect to the pedestrian circulation path located along Valencia Road. Sidewalks are to be flood free for all storm discharges of up to a ten (10) year flood. The sidewalk along the entry PAAL ends without connecting to the site and does not indicate a connection to pads within the future development. These connections must be shown on the plan. Additional sidewalks will be required along the west, south and east sides of the building and meet requirements of DS 3-05.2.2.B.1 requiring a five (5) foot pedestrian refuge between a structure and a PAAL. DS 2-08.4.1.B, D, E & DS 3-05.2.2.B.1 27. Because the GFA has not been provided the correct number of off-street loading spaces can not be determined. Once this information is provided off-street loading will be reviewed. 28. Please correct Keynote 12 on sheet 2 of 4 to "Proposed 12'x35' Loading Zone". 29. The PAAL running along the north does meet the minimum requirements. Detail L on sheet 4 of 4 does not show the angled parking spaces and the required one (1) foot setback between the canopy measured from the roof over hang to the edge of PAAL. Please correct this detail. The remainder PAAL width is less than twenty-two (22) feet, and does not meet the requirement for a two way PAAL. If this PAAL, which extends around the building, is one-way, please label as such. 30. Detectable warnings (truncated domes) are required at marked crossings (crosswalks). The area covered by the truncated domes shall be twenty-four (24) inch deep and extend the full width of the crosswalk, preceding the crosswalk. Truncated domes will also be required preceding all access aisles to handicap parking spaces. ANSI 406.12 31. Of the two (2) provided handicapped parking spaces one is required to be Van Accessible. IBC1106.5 32. Please correct detail N note 1. The bottom of the sign should be no less than seven (7) feet above finished grade per TDOT regulations. 33. All revisions made to the development plan must also be made to the landscape, irrigation, NPPO and grading plans as applicable. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Karol Aragonez, (520) 791-5550. KAA C:\planning\cdrc\developmentplan\D006-0035dp.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development plan and additional requested documents. |
| 08/24/2006 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | 4350 E. Irvington Road, Tucson, AZ 85714 Post Office Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702 WR#168187 August 23, 2006 Engineering and Environmental Consultants Attn: Bruce Wilson 4625 E Ft. Lowell Rd Tucson, Arizona 85712 Dear Mr. Wilson : SUBJECT: Valencia Car Wash D06-0035 Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the development plan submitted (date). It appears that there are no conflicts with the existing facilities within the boundaries of this proposed development. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. In order to apply for electric service, call the New Construction Department at (520) 918-8300. Submit a final set of plans including approved site, offsite and electrical load plans. Include a CD with the AutoCAD version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Your final plans should be sent to: Tucson Electric Power Company Attn: Ms. Mary Boice New Business Project Manager P. O. Box 711 (DB-101) Tucson, AZ 85702 520-917-8732 Please call the area Designer Mike Kaiserat (520) 918-8244, should you have any questions. Sincerely, Elizabeth Miranda Office Support Specialist Design/Build kc Enclosures cc: Patricia Gehlen, City of Tucson (e-mail) Mike Kaiser, Tucson Electric Power |
| 08/25/2006 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | ADOT HAS NO COMMENT D06-0035 ENGINEERING and ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS, INC VALENCIA CAR WASH -------------------------------------------------------- Confidentiality and Nondisclosure Notice: This email transmission and any attachments are intended for use by the person(s)/entity(ies) named above and may contain confidential/privileged information. Any unauthorized use, disclosure or distribution is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by e-mail, and delete or destroy all copies plus attachments. |
| 09/05/2006 | JCLARK3 | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | * No known landfill within 1000 feet of this development. * Approved-conditionally * Detail shows a curb going straight out from the wall. Plan doesnot show the curb. In front of the enclosure a 14' X 40' clear area is required. The curb would be inconflict with the clear area. * Plan does not show a dimensions for the access along the south property and the building. If this is an access a minimum of 16' is required for one way traffic flow. |
| 09/06/2006 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Landscaping, compatible with pedestrian safety, drainage and sight distance is required in the area between the existing/future shoulder or curb and the property line. Maintenance of the landscaping shall be the responsibility of the abutting owner. Add landscaping and notes as necessary. MS&R Plan Policy 5, LUC 3.7.5 2) Revise the development plan to show the proposed sidewalk in channel Section A on sheet 3. 3) Revise the development plan to show the proposed sidewalk and bike lane in section F on sheet 4 of the development plan. C9-05-10 4) Add the CDRC case number and any related case numbers to the landscape and native plant preservation plans. DS 2-07.2.1.B 5) Revise the landscape plan to provide trees spaced in accordance with LUC 3.7.2.4 for the Valencia Road landscape border. Trees are to be provided for every thirty-three feet. 6) Fifty (50) percent or more of the area of the Valencia Road street landscape border must be covered with shrubs or vegetative ground cover. In situations where the street landscape border is wider than the minimum ten (10) foot requirement, the landscape border width needs to be determined for the purposes of calculating the fifty (50) percent vegetative coverage requirement, Sec. 3.7.2.4 of the LUC. The width is that area between the required screen and the property line. 7) Keynote 26 on sheet 3 of the development plan indicates water harvesting areas. Provide additional information. DS 2-07.2.2.C.5 8) Keynote 25 on sheet 2 of the development plan indicates existing temporary structures east of the driveway. DS 2-05.2.3.G |
| 09/11/2006 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: D06-0035 VALENCIA CAR WASH/DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE: 9/11/06 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: Delete reference to Docket/Pages for all adjacent parcels. Completely label Headley Road on Sheet 2. Spell out Avenue for Sandpiper on Sheets 2 & 3. es |
| 09/11/2006 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Denied | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT D06-0035 Valencia Car Wash 09/11/06 () Tentative Plat ( X ) Development Plan ( X ) Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other CROSS REFERENCE: C9-05-10 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Santa Cruz GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: Gateway COMMENTS DUE BY: September 18, 2006 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment () Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies ( X ) See Additional Comments Attached () No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: ( X ) Resubmittal Required: () Tentative Plat ( X ) Development Plan ( X ) Landscape Plan () Other REVIEWER: JBeall 791-4505 DATE: 9/12/06 The applicant’s request to rezone the property from C-1 to C-1/C-2 was approved by Mayor and Council, and is subject to meeting specific rezoning conditions. It appears that the rezoning condition, numeral 1., needs to be corrected to read Section 5.3.8, instead of Section 5, 3 and 8 ( see sheet 2 of 4). Defer to Traffic Engineering for comments and compliance of the following rezoning conditions: 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10. Defer to Historic Preservation for comments and compliance of the following rezoning condition: 26. Defer to Floodplain Engineering for comment and compliance of the following rezoning condition: 25. Defer to Tucson Police Department for comment and compliance of the following rezoning condition: 27. The development plan and the landscape plan should identify, including dimensions, of the required dedicated corridor for the Santa Cruz River Linear Park. Please provide a note in the Key Notes section of sheet 2 of 4. (Rezoning Conditions: 11, 12, 13, and 14.) The General Notes section under Zoning Code Review indicates that the building height is 40’ maximum. However the Rezoning Conditions indicate that all buildings on the site shall be limited to one story. Please include a note in the General Notes section that reads “All buildings shall be limited to one story.” Also include a note in the Key Notes section on sheet 2 of 4 that identifies and provides a dimension for all proposed buildings for the car wash. (Rezoning Condition: 15) The General Notes section should include a note that reads “Loudspeakers or other communications systems shall be located a minimum of one hundred (100) feet away from adjacent residential uses or zones.” (Rezoning Condition: 16) The General Notes section should include a note that reads, “All unsightly and noise-generating elements shall be located a minimum of fifty (50) feet away from adjacent residential property. These elements shall be screened using masonry walls and landscaping to mitigate potential visual, odor, and noise impacts. These include service lanes (drive-through), loading zones, trash containers, and compactors.” (Rezoning Condition: 17) Provide building elevations and details of the rear and side building facades which show that the architectural character and detail is comparable to the front façade, including, but not limited to comparable color palette and signs. (Rezoning Condition: 18) The General Notes section should include a note that reads, “All exterior mechanical equipment shall be screened from view of adjacent development and street frontages, and shall be architecturally integrated into the overall design of the buildings and development.” Please provide a typical or an architectural detail for such screening. (Rezoning Condition: 19) The General Notes section should include a note that reads, “All outdoor lighting shall be full cutoff and directed down and shielded away from adjacent residential parcels and public roadways.” (Rezoning Condition: 20) Defer to Development Services for comment and compliance of the following rezoning condition: 21, 22. Provide sectional detail, and/or typical, for all walls that are visible from a public right-of-way, and/or adjacent to existing residential development which shows that these walls are graffiti-resistant, and incorporate more visually appealing design treatments. (Rezoning Condition: 23, 24) Provide a notation on Detail B - Trash Enclosure Detail of sheet 4 of 4 that indicates the walls are graffiti-resistant. (Rezoning Condition: 23) |
| 09/18/2006 | FRODRIG2 | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Denied | Please provide Real Estate with the following: 1. Title report for the subject property dated within 30 days. 2. Legal description and sketch for right of way dedications as required by rezoning case C9-05-10, conditions No.# 2-4 and 11-13. 3. Provide recording information for the Joint Use Access Easement and for the Abandonment of Easement recorded in Docket 8102, at Page 1735. |
| 09/19/2006 | JOSE ORTIZ | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Denied | September 19, 2006 ACTIVITY NUMBER: D06-0035 PROJECT NAME: Valencia Car Wash PROJECT ADDRESS: 2011 W Valencia Road PROJECT REVIEWER: Jose E. Ortiz PE, Traffic Engineer Resubmittal Required: Traffic Engineering was unable to conduct a review due to a lack of information. In order to conduct a proper review the following items need to be submitted with the next submittal. A Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) and a copy of the accepted rezoning conditions for traffic. The following items must be revised or added to the plan. 1. The curb opening for the PAAL along Valencia appears excessive. The maximum curb cut is 35 feet per Tucson Codes section 25-39. Please address this issue in the TIA for justification for a 56' curb opening. 2. Verify that the 36' proposed joint access easement is a PAAL. If so please label it as being a PAAL . If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-4259 x305 or Jose.Ortiz@tucsonaz.gov |
| 09/22/2006 | PGEHLEN1 | TUCSON WATER NEW AREA DEVELOPMENT | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 10/02/2006 | JASON GREEN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: October 2, 2006 SUBJECT: Engineering review Valencia Car Wash- Development Plan TO: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager LOCATION: 2011 W Valencia, T15S R13E Sec15, Ward 1 REVIEWERS: Jason Green, CFM ACTIVITY: D06-0035 SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Development Services Department has received the proposed development plan and the submitted drainage report. Engineering Division has reviewed the submitted development plan and drainage report and does not recommend approval of the development plan at this time. The drainage report was reviewed for development plan purposes only. The following items need to be addressed: DEVELOPMENT PLAN: 1) DS Sec.2-05.2.1.C: Revise the project location map on Sheet 1 to label the West Branch of the Santa Cruz River (WBSCR) and label the Tohono O'Odham Nation (not Pima County) to the west of the site. 2) DS Sec.2-05.2.1.K: The correct development plan number (D06-0035) may be added to the lower right hand corner of the plan where indicated by the "D05-00XX". 3) DS Sec.2-05.2.2.A.2: Provide the original seal and signature of the registered professional engineer. The development plan must have the original seal stamped and signed by the registrant, Edwin Bruce Wilson, PE prior to development plan approval. 4) DS Sec.2-05.2.2.B.10: Provide a General Note on the development plan stating that the project is designed to meet the criteria for the Major Streets and Routes setback Zone (MS&R) for Valencia Road. 5) DS Sec.2-05.2.2.C.1.b: Revise General Note #22 to state all of the following from the Development Standard; "Drainage will remain in its natural state and will not be altered, disturbed, or obstructed other than as shown on this development plan." 6) DS Sec.2-05.2.3.B: Provide a copy of the proposed joint use access easement with recordation information when complete for the proposed access P.A.A.L. off of Valencia Road. This along with the abandonment of the existing thirty (30) foot easement will be require prior to development plan approval. 7) DS Sec.2-05.2.3.C: Revise the development plan to label curbs, curb cuts, sidewalks and utility location. The proposed sidewalk along Valencia is required to be constructed at 6-foot width with curb along the street frontage of Valencia Road; the proposed sidewalk is labeled as 5-foot in Key Note #8, revise to read 6-foot. Per the adopted Mayor and Counsel policy all sidewalks along MS&R right-of-ways for arterial and collector streets require 6-foot wide sidewalks. Label the proposed sidewalk to be constructed as 6-foot. 8) DS Sec.2-05.2.3.H: Revise the development plan to show and label the existing spillways and bank protection for the WBSCR. 9) DS Sec.2-05.2.3.I.1: Revise the development plan to show the limits of the FEMA Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA) Zone AE with the associated Water Surface Elevation (WSEL) as shown on the FEMA approved Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs). The WSEL must be clearly labeled and must represent the datum shown in the Flood Insurance Study. If datum is to be converted provide both NGVD 29 and NAVD88 datum references with conversions. 10) DS Sec.2-05.2.3.I.1: Revise the development plan and associated drainage report to show that the subject parcel is located within a FEMA Shaded Zone X, 500 year floodplain as shown on the Community FIRM Panel # 04019C2220K. 11) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.A: Provide a survey showing proposed lot splits with site boundary information, including bearing in degrees, minutes and seconds that match the proposed development plan. Provide the gross area for each proposed lot. 12) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.D.3: Provide cross-section details for all parking area access lanes (PAALs) on the development plan. PAALs must be designed in accordance with DS Sec.3-04.0. Provide dimensions of parking spaces for all PAAL according to DS Sec.3-05.2.4, show the minimum standard parking space size of 8'-6" X 18' or label the wheel stop curbing, refer to Fig 5 DS Sec.3-05.2.3.C.2. 13) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.E: Revise the development plan to label and dimension the future MS&R right-of-way widths for Valencia Road. No development is allowed within the future half right-of-way width without approval from TDOT Permits and Codes. 14) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.G: Revise the development plan to show all easements for utilities, drainage, access, sewer, etc. and label as to their purpose and whether they will be public or private. 15) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.H: Provide on the development plan all information associated with the drainage report. The following information must be indicated on the development plan: I. Revise the development plan to show the ponding limits on the upstream end of the proposed elliptical culverts. Provide the WSEL for the proposed channel located on the north side of the development. II. Provide approval from TDOT Permits and Codes for the proposed channel within the public right-of-way. A right-of-way use permit application will be required prior to construction. Contact Steve Tineo at 741-3115 for all right-of-way requirements and permit applications. III. Revise the development plan and the associated drainage report to show the required type of drainage structure that is allowed within a public right-of-way. The proposed culverts at the access point must be entirely contained within the private property or if the proposed culverts are within a Public right-of-way they must be designed as reinforced concrete. Revise hydraulic calculations if culverts are revised to reinforced concrete pipes. 16) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.K: Provide a continuous pedestrian circulation path that connects all public access areas of the proposed building and the proposed circulation path located on the proposed P.A.A.L access point. Per DS Sec.2-08 provide pedestrian circulation around the entire proposed structure for pedestrian safety. Sidewalks are to be flood free for all storm discharges of up to a ten (10) year flood, provide a revised drainage report showing calculations, sizing and a detail for all sidewalk scuppers. 17) DS Sec.3-01.3.3.B.5: Provide a minimum 4-foot wide, 5-feet where sidewalks are adjacent to any vehicular use area, pedestrian circulation around the entire proposed structure, sidewalks must be physically separated from any vehicular travel lane (proposed location of loading zone) by means of curbing, grade separation, railing, or barriers. Refer to DS Sec.3-01.3.3 for pedestrian circulation paths. 18) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.O: Revise Key Note #12 to call out the correct dimensions for the proposed loading zone, the note calls out the loading zone as 1' x 35'. Provide the required maneuvering area for all loading zones that are shown on the development plan. Refer to AASHTO for the national standards for turning radii. 19) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.P: Revise detail D/4 on sheet 4 of 4 to call out the dimensions for the proposed pedestrian circulation area. Also revise detail F/4 to show the dimensions for the 6-foot sidewalk and curb that are required within Valencia Road right-of-way. 20) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.U: Per rezoning conditions 11 thru 14 the developer is responsible for dedicating a thirty (30) foot wide corridor along the West Branch of the Santa Cruz River Diversion Channel as part of the West Branch Santa Cruz River Linear Park for the length of the subject parcel's frontage. This corridor is to include a 12-foot wide paved path for that entire length and be approved by City and County Parks and Recreation Departments. Show this requirement on the development plan and provide the documentation of recordation of the dedication. 21) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.X: Revise the landscape plan to show the existing and future SVTs. No structures, signs, or vegetation is allowed within the 30" to 72" height limits within the sight visibility triangles. 22) DS Sec.11-01.2.1: Provide estimated cut and fill quantities on the development plan for grading plan purposes. 23) DS 10-02.0, Section 14.3.2: Provide a note on the development plan stating that, (a) the owner or owners shall be solely responsible for operation, maintenance, and liability for drainage structures and detention basins; (b) that the owner or owners shall have an Arizona Registered Professional Civil Engineer prepare a certified inspection report for the drainage and detention/retention facilities at lease once each year, and that these regular inspection reports will be on file with the owner for review by City staff, upon written request; (c) that City staff may periodically inspect the drainage and retention/detention facilities to verify that scheduled and unscheduled maintenance activities are being performed adequately; and (d) that the owner or owners agree to reimburse the City for any and all costs associated with the maintaining of the drainage and detention/retention facilities, should the City find the owner or owners deficient in their obligation to adequately operate and maintain their facilities." DRAINAGE REPORT: 24) Revise Section 2.3 FEMA Floodplain Designation to state that the subject parcel is located within a FEMA Shaded 500-year Zone X floodplain as delineated on the Communities FIRM Panel # 04019C2229K. Review of the approved work maps, that are on record at the City of Tucson DSD floodplain counter, show that the online FIRM Panel 2220K is incorrect. The LOMR dated September 9, 2002 verifies that the subject area has not changed and is still mapped by FEMA to be within a Shaded Zone X 500-year floodplain. 25) DS Sec.2-03.2.4.K: A Geotechnical Report is required for this project due to the proposed retention basin. The soils report needs to discuss suitability and feasibility of the project. Description of existing soil constraints for the site, structural design recommendations, pavement design section, and other typical geotechnical data is needed. The soils report shall provide identification / assessment of any potentially hazardous geotechnical areas, provide proposed recommendations for setbacks from building to drainage areas include minimum distance from foundations to drainage swales, and provide infiltration test results. The geotechnical report shall specifically address all criteria listed in this section. See last sentence of this section for items 6 (c) & (d) regarding hydro-collapsing soils and 30-foot test boring for basin design. Recommendations need to be incorporated into the development plan and drainage report. 26) DS Sec.10-02.2.3.1.4.C.2: Provide on the development plans the ponding limits at the upstream end of the proposed culverts. Revise the development plan and/or drainage report to show the required reinforced concrete culverts versus the proposed corrugated metal pipes (CMPs) that are shown to be within the Public right-of-way. If the proposed culverts are entirely contained within the private property the proposed CMPs do not need to be revised. 27) DS Sec.10-02.2.3.1.4.C.8: Provide on the development plans a note or label showing that the 100-year WSEL is contained within the proposed channel. 28) DS Sec. 3-01.4.4.F: Provide a revised drainage report showing scupper calculations that demonstrate that the 10-year flood flow is contained under the sidewalk at all scupper concentration points. Provide details and dimensions in plan view for the scuppers on the proposed development plan. 29) Further comments may be required at resubmittal of the drainage report, development plan, and geotechnical report. GEOTECHNICAL REPORT: 30) DS Sec.10-01.III.3.5.1.3.a, 10-02.14.2.6: A geotechnical evaluation needs to be submitted for review, addressing the following: a) Soils report should provide conformance with DS section 10-02.14.2.6 regarding 30-foot boring for basin, and provide discussion of potential for hydro-collapsible soils and any recommendation for setbacks from building to basin. b) The soils report shall provide identification / assessment of any potentially hazardous geotechnical areas, and state any geotechnical recommendations and whether there are special provisions for the soil preparation for this development. c) Provide slope stability recommendations for any proposed constructed slopes. d) Provide pavement structure design recommendations. e) Provide percolation rates for retention/detention basins for 5-year threshold retention. GENERAL COMMENTS: Please provide a revised development plan, a revised drainage report, a revised landscape plan, and a geotechnical report that address the comments provided above. Include a comprehensive response letter addressing in detail responses to all of the above comments. Further comments may be generated upon resubmittal of the development plan, drainage report, and geotechnical report reviews. For any questions, or to schedule a meeting call me at 791-5550, extension 1189. Jason Green, CFM Senior Engineer Associate Engineering Division Development Services |
| 10/02/2006 | FRODRIG2 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Approved | Transportation Information for Rezoning, Subdivision, and Development Requests Delivered to: Date Delivered: Development Services - City of Tucson 8/24/2006 Case Number Project Name Average number of daily trips (ADT) forecasted as a result of the proposed development This information is provided for jurisdictional planning departments to assess the impact of the proposed residential or commercial development on surrounding traffic patterns and roads. If the forecasted daily traffic exceeds 500 average daily trips, a more detailed analysis is also provided. D06-0035 Valencia car Wash 254 D06-0033 Walmart Neighborhood Market 3,843 D06-0034 Hermosa Village 761 Pima Association of Governments Sandra C. Holland, Data Services 177 N. Church Ave., Suite 405, Tucson, Arizona 85701-1127 (520) 792-1093 FAX (520) 620-6981 |
| 10/02/2006 | TIM ROWE | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | October 2, 2006 To: Bruce Wilson, EEC Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Project Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department ____________________________________ From: Michael J. Harrington (520-740-6579), representing the Pima County Departments of Wastewater Management and Environmental Quality Subject: Valencia Car Wash Development Plan - 1st Submittal D06-0035 The proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. This project will be tributary to the Roger Road Wastewater Treatment Facility via the Southwest interceptor. Obtain a letter from the PCWMD's Development Services Section, written within the past 90 days, stating that treatment and conveyance system capacity for the project is available in the downstream public sewerage system and provide a copy of that letter to this office. The required form to request such a letter may be found at: http://www.pima.gov/wwm/forms/docs/CapResponseRequest.pdf. The development plan for this project cannot be approved until a copy of this letter has been received by this office. All Sheets: Add the development plan case number, D06-0035, to the title block of each sheet. This number should be shown larger or bolder than any cross reference numbers. No wastewater review fees will be charged for sheets where this is the only required revision. Sheet 1: General Notes #3 and #12 are basically the same. Are they both required by city staff? Sheet 1: Revised General Note #17 so that it states: THIS PROJECT WILL HAVE ______ EXISTING AND______ PROPOSED WASTEWATER FIXTURE UNIT EQUIVALENTS PER TABLE 13.20.045(E)(1) IN PIMA COUNTY CODE 13.20.045(E). And fill in the blanks with the appropriate values. Sheet 1: Revise General Note #21 so that it states: THE ON-SITE SANITARY SEWERS WILL BE PRIVATE AND WILL BE CONSTRUCTED, OPERATED AND MAINTAINED ON A PRIVATE BASIS, AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH AN APPROVED OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE PLAN, IF REQUIRED. THE LOCATION AND METHOD OF CONNECTION TO AN EXISTING PUBLIC SANITARY SEWER IS SUBJECT TO REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT AT THE TIME OF SUBMITTAL OF PLUMBING OR BUILDING PLANS. Sheet 1: There is no public sewer easement located on the project site. Delete General Note #26 and General Note #27. Sheet 2: The public sewers that are adjacent to this project are not properly identified. There is a private abandoned force main (inactive) north of this project, plan G-81-27. and manholes, manhole IMS numbers and sewer main improvement plan numbers are not shown. Revise the site plan so that: All public sewer elements, within 100’ and adjacent to this project, are identified with manhole IMS numbers, pipe size and improvement plan numbers. Sheet 2: There is a 30’ public sewer easement adjacent to this project at the west property line. Revise the site plan so that it shows: The 30’ public sewer easement, with the appropriate recording information. Sheet 2: You are proposing to connect to the 10” public sewer main, G-94-097, with a 6” direct tap connection. PCWMD requires that this connection be made through a new public manhole. See PC/COT standard detail WWM 401. Revise the design as needed. Sheet 2: Revise the site plan so that: Cleanouts are provide at a minimum of every 100’. This office will require a revised set of bluelines, and a response letter, addressing these comments. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. Pima County Code Title 13.20.030.A.2 requires that a wastewater review fee be paid for each submittal of the development plan. The fee for the first submittal is $166 plus $50 per sheet. For the second submittal, the review fee is $50 per sheet. For all subsequent submittals, the review fee is $39 per sheet. The next submittal of this project will be the second (2nd) submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $100.00 (made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER) must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. If you have any questions regarding the above mentioned comments, please contact me at the telephone number shown under my signature on the first page of this letter CC: Project File |
| 10/10/2006 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Denied | DATE: October 10, 2006 TO: Ferne Rodriguez, Development Services FROM: Glenn Hicks Parks and Recreation 791-4873 ext. 215 Glenn.Hicks@tucsonaz.gov CC: SUBJECT: D06-0035 Valencia Car Wash: Development Plan Denied. Please contact Parks and Recreation to arrange a meeting to discuss rezoning conditions 11-14 relating to requirements and specifications for the West Branch Santa Cruz River Linear Park. |
| 10/10/2006 | ROBERT YOUNG | PIMA COUNTY | PIMA CTY - DEV REVIEW | Passed | |
| 10/18/2006 | ED ABRIGO | PIMA COUNTY | ASSESSOR | Passed | |
| 10/20/2006 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES October 20, 2006 Bruce Wilson Engineering and Environmental Consultants, Inc. 4625 East Fort Lowell Road Tucson, Arizona 85712 Subject: D06-0035 Valencia Car Wash Development Plan Dear Bruce: Your submittal of August 18, 2006 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 11 Copies Revised Development Plan (Zoning, ESD, Landscape, Addressing, DUPD, Real Estate, Traffic, Engineering, Wastewater, Parks and Recreation, DSD) 6 Copies Revised Landscape Plan (Zoning, Landscape, DUPD, Engineering, Parks and Recreation, DSD ) 2 Copies Revised Drainage Report (Engineering, DSD) 2 Copies Approved Lot Split Documents (Zoning, DSD) 2 Copies Color Building Elevations (DUPD, DSD) 2 Copies Title Report (Real Estate, DSD) 2 Copies Traffic Impact Analysis (Traffic, DSD) 2 Copies Geotechnical Report (Engineering, DSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 791-5608 extension 1179. Sincerely, Patricia Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 321-4625 |