Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Permit Number - D06-0033
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08/11/2006 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 08/16/2006 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | NO COMMENT D06-0033 BSW INTERNATIONAL. INC WALMART NEIGHBORHOOD MARKET -------------------------------------------------------- Confidentiality and Nondisclosure Notice: This email transmission and any attachments are intended for use by the person(s)/entity(ies) named above and may contain confidential/privileged information. Any unauthorized use, disclosure or distribution is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by e-mail, and delete or destroy all copies plus attachments. |
| 08/24/2006 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | 4350 E. Irvington Road, Tucson, AZ 85714 Post Office Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702 WR# 167778 August 23, 2006 BSW International, Inc. ATTN: Mr. Maolin Zheng 3420 E. Shea Blvd., Ste 200 Phoenix, AZ 85023 Dear Mr. Zheng: SUBJECT: WALMART NEIGHBORHOOD MARKET D06-0033 Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the development plan submitted August 23, 2006 All TEP facilities that need to be relocated due to conflicts with new development will be billable to the customer. The customer is to provide all civil work and easements per TEP specifications. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. In order to apply for electric service, call the New Construction Department at (520) 918-8300. Submit a final set of plans including approved site, offsite and electrical load plans. Include a CD with the AutoCAD version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Your final plans should be sent to: Tucson Electric Power Company Attn: Ms. Mary Boice New Business Project Manager P. O. Box 711 (DB-101) Tucson, AZ 85702 520-917-8732 Please call the area Designer Nancy DiMaria at (520) 918-8267, should you have any questions. Sincerely, Henrietta Noriega Office Specialist Design/Build Enclosures cc: N. DiMaria, TEP P. Gehlen, City of Tucson (by e-mail) |
| 08/24/2006 | JCLARK3 | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Approved | * No known landfill with in 1000 feet of this development. * Conversion of the County Fair shopping center into a Wal-Mart Food Mart. * Shown compactor is approved for service and access. |
| 08/28/2006 | KAROL ARAGONEZ | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Karol Aragonez Planner PROJECT: D06-0033 Walmart Neighborhood Market Development Plan TRANSMITTAL DATE: August 11, 2006 DUE DATE: September 11, 2006 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is August 10, 2007. 2. Please revise the location map with the following: a. All lettering within the location map is to be twelve (0.12) point. b. Correct the section, township, range from Sec. 21, T13S, R13E to Sec. 24, T 14S, R14 E. 3. Case number D06-0033 has been assigned to this development plan (DP). Please place this number in the right corner of all sheets of the development plan, landscape plan, NPPO, and any other associated sheets. DS 2-05.2.2.B.2 4. Please list in the general notes the proposed use of the property DS 2-05.2.2.B.3 5. Please list all zoning variances or modifications that are applicable to the project such as Board of Adjustment, Project Design Options, etc. Provide the case number, date of approval, what was approved, and conditions of approval. If none exist provide response to reviewer's comments. Provide a separate response letter detailing compliance with rezoning conditions for case number C9-85-36. DS 2-05.2.2.B.6 6. Please add as a general note: "This project is designed to meet the overlay zone criteria of Sec. 2.8.1, Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Setback Zone". 7. Please add to general note 1 the gross site area in square feet (263,538 sq. ft.). DS 2-05.2.2.B.11 8. Please draw all existing easements on the plan along with recordation information, location, width, and purpose. If an easement is no longer in use and scheduled to be vacated or has been abandoned, so indicate. If none exist provide response to reviewer's comments. Also if easements are purposed please draw, dimension and label as to their purpose and whether they will be public or private. If none exist provide response to reviewer's comments. DS 2-05.2.3.B & DS 2-05.2.4.G 9. Please provide the recordation data, dimensioned widths of curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks for both Twenty-second Street, Craycroft Road, Jefferson Avenue, and Juarez Street on the development plan (DP). DS 2-05.2.3.C 10. Basis of bearings on Twenty-second Street is written twice and cannot be read on sheet 2 of 3 of the DP. Please correct. 11. Please provide a dimension from the proposed structure to Twenty-second Street. DS 2-05.2.4.I 12. Please provide the square footage of commercial vacant building 5510 and 5504 on the DP. DS 2-05.2.4.M 13. It appears that the trash receptacle behind the vacant building abutting Craycroft cannot be maneuvered into without utilizing required parking if accessible at all. Please demonstrate on the DP the maneuvering area in and out of all dumpster locations. Maneuvering radii can be verified by COT Engineering. DS 2-05.2.4.T 14. Please indicate the location and type of postal service to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements. If mail is to be delivered to an area with a building please state so on the plan. DS 2-05.2.4.V 15. At least one (1) sidewalk will be provided from each street to the project on which the project has frontage, unless there is no vehicular access from a street because of a wall or fence. Pedestrian access should extend to Jefferson Avenue and tie into the existing sidewalk in the street right-of-way (R/W). DS 2-08.4.1.A 16. Please dimension all sidewalks within site. Minimum width for sidewalks is four (4) feet and meets all requirements per Development Standard 2-08.5.1. Dimensioning of the sidewalk areas at the entrance to the building where planters are shown must be shown to assure that a four (4) foot wide path is maintained. DS 2-08.5.1 17. Bicycle parking provided on the DP does not meet the requirements of revised DS (Development Standard) 2-09. Per DS 2-09.4.1 Class 2 bicycle parking facilities will be located no more than fifty (50) feet from the main building entrance(s) and will be along the front side of the building as well as along other sides of the building that has an entrance. Bicycle access through the development will be separate from the pedestrian ways. Vehicular access may be used as bicycle access. Bicycle access to a parking facility may cross a pedestrian way at a right angle (DS2-09.3.2). Multiple rack bicycle parking require a minimum thirty (30 inches between outer spaces of posts or racks (DS 2-09.5.1.A). Please review revised DS 2-09 and provide the necessary corrections to the bicycle parking on the plan view and detail as required. Once changes are provided and reviewed further comments may result. The revised DS may be found on the web at: http://www.tucsonaz.gov/dsd/Codes___Ordinances/DevStd209.pdf DS 2-09.0 18. Please provide the location of the Class 1 long term bicycle parking. Per LUC 3.3.4 Food and Beverage Sales the required amount of bicycle parking is eight (8) percent of the provided number of motor vehicle parking spaces of which fifty (50) percent is to be Class 1 and fifty (50) percent Class 2. Class 2 is described as covered, secured bicycle parking facilities that protects from direct sunlight and theft of the entire bicycle and of its components and accessories. Please review revised DS 2-09 and provide the Class 1 bicycle parking as required in both plan view and as a detail. Once changes are provided and reviewed further comments may result. The revised DS may be found on the web at: http://www.tucsonaz.gov/dsd/Codes___Ordinances/DevStd209.pdf DS 2-09.0 & LUC 3.3.4 19. Motor vehicle parking spaces that abuts any vertical object over six (6) inches in height will require the space to be increased to ten (10) feet in width to provide extra width to allow passengers to enter and exit their vehicles on the side where the barrier exists. Please assure that spaces next to cart corrals meet this requirement. Also the parking space that appears to be abutting the dumpster in southwest portion of the site must meet this requirement. DS 3-05.2.1.B.3 20. The minimum width for a two way PAAL or a PAAL that accesses ninety (90) degree-parking spaces is twenty-four (24) feet wide. Please dimension the PAAL at the rear of the grocery at the exit east of the loading dock from the edge of the concrete landing south to the vertical curb, from the trash compactor area south to the vertical curb and the PAAL providing access to the eight (8) parking spaces at the southwest of the grocery. DS 3-05.2.1.C.1 21. Please dimension the drive-through lane leading to the window. Minimum width allowed is eleven (11) feet. The minimum drive-through lane width at the window is nine (9) feet. A minimum distance of one (1) foot must be maintained between a structure and the drive-through lane DS 3-05.2.1.C.2.a & DS 3-05.2.2.B.4 22. Please show the stacking spaces for the drive-through lane. Minimum stacking capacity is six (6) including the space at the window. The length of a stacking space is eighteen (18) feet. If there is a roof structure over the drive-through a height clearance of fifteen feet must be maintained. DS 3-05.2.1.C.2.c & d, DS3-05.2.1.C.4 23. If the main entrance is covered, extending to the edge of PAAL a minimum distance of one (1) foot must be maintained between it and the PAAL. Please show the required one (1) foot between the main entrance and PAAL if the area is covered. DS3-05.2.2.B.1 24. Please provide the sight visibility triangles for access PAALs off of Jefferson. DS3-05.2.2.C 25. Please dimension the back-up spur in the southwest corner of the site. The spur will be a minimum of three (3) feet in depth and will have a three (3) foot radii. A back-up spur will also be required at the end of the eight (8) parking spaces located behind vacant building 5510. DS 3-05.2.2.D 26. Wheel stop curbing may be necessary to prevent parked vehicles from damaging adjacent landscaping, walls, building, or overhanging adjacent sidewalk areas that are less than six and one-half (6 1/2) feet wide. It appears that these examples are occurring on site for a number of parking spaces and thus would require wheel stop curbing. Please review all parking scenarios on site and provide wheel stop curbing as necessary. When wheel stop curbing is used it is to be located two and one-half (2 1/2) feet from the front of the parking space. If used please update both the handicap and standard parking space details on sheet 1 of 3. DS 3-05.2.3.C 27. The original DP provided four (4) off-street loading spaces on site. One (1) for what is currently Hollywood Video and Harbor Freight, two for the then Lucky's Supermarket, and one (1) behind commercial building 5504. All where dimensioned twelve (12) by thirty-five (35) feet. The current LUC requires four (4) off-street loading spaces as well, all twelve (12) by thirty-five (35) feet. Please do the following: a) Provide the location of the off-street loading space that was removed from behind commercial building 5504. The loading space should be close proximity to the service entrance of the use it serves. b) Dimension all off street loading spaces Twelve (12) feet by thirty-five (35) feet, c) All maneuvering in and out of the space must occur on site using the national standards for turning radii required of the vehicles for which the loading space is designed. d) New loading spaces must conform screening and landscaping requirements. e) Revise the off-street loading parking calculations on sheet 1 of 3 to reflect the correct number of off-street loading spaces required and provided. LUC 3.4.4.1, LUC3.4.4.2, LUC3.4.4.3, & 3.4.5.3 28. Please correct zoning setbacks on sheet 1 of 3. Per perimeter yard "DD" Twenty-second Street and Craycroft Road (MS&R) is based on the ADT of over 1000 trips per day requiring a building setback of the greater of twenty-one (21) feet or the height of the building wall measured from the back of existing curb or future curb location. Juarez Street and Jefferson Avenue would require an established side street setback of ten (10) feet from property line. LUC 2.8.3.6, LUC3.2.6.5.A, & LUC Table 3.2.6-I 29. Please provide the Floor Area Ratio Calculation (FAR) as required by development designator "28" and remove references to lot coverage. Maximum allowed FAR is 0.35. Lot coverage does not pertain to this project. LUC 3.2.3.2.B 30. Please list the proposed use of the project as a general note. LUC 2.5.3.2.B.1 31. Please indicate if there are existing billboards on site. Billboards will be required to meet all LUC requirements as stated in LUC Sec. 3.5.4.26. If none exists please state so. LUC 3.5.4.26 32. Detectable warnings (truncated domes) are required at marked crossings (crosswalks). The area covered by the truncated domes shall be twenty-four (24) inch deep and extend the full width of the crosswalk, preceding the crosswalk, including the handicap access aisle. All accessible curb ramps including the flush entrance into the grocery shall have truncated domes installed that shall be twenty-four (24) inches minimum in the direction of travel and extend the full width of the curb ramp or flush surface. The domes shall be located so the edge nearest the curb line is six (6) inches to eight (8) inches from the curb line. Please revise keynote 4 and 19 ANSI 406.12, ANSI 705 33. The required number of accessible parking spaces is eight (8) based on the total parking spaces provided are between 301 to 400. Of those eight (8) accessible spaces, two (2) are required to be Van Accessible. Please revise parking calculation to reflect this. IBC2003 Sec 1106.1 & 1106.5 34. Per general restriction list in LUC Sec. 2.5.3.6.B all land use activities except vehicle use areas shall be conducted entirely within an enclosed building unless specifically provided otherwise. This pertains to the proposed outdoor storage area for pallets shown in the rear of the grocery. Please remove. LUC 2.5.3.6.B 35. The parking study is currently being reviewed by Traffic Engineering for sufficient information. Once this review is complete further comments may be forthcoming. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Karol Aragonez, (520) 791-5550. KAA C:\planning\cdrc\developmentplan\D06-0033dp.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development plan and additional requested documents. |
| 08/28/2006 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) A 10' wide street landscape border per LUC 3.7.2.4.A is required along the entire street frontage (all streets), except for ingress/egress and existing building locations, in order to qualify for the parking reduction in LUC 33.3.8.3. 2) The Landscape Section believes that if the entire site is modified to comply with Sec. 3.7.0, Landscaping and Screening Regulations, the number of required parking spaces may be reduced up to ten (10) percent for the entire site, not solely for the Wal-Mart building. The reduction may be more than the figure calculated on the development plan. Verify with the Zoning Section. 3) In order to comply with the Landscape and Screening regulations, several existing screen walls will need to be relocated in accordance with LUC 3.7.3.2. "so that they do not obstruct the view of the street landscape border from the street." 4) Landscape borders proposed in right-of-way or MS&R areas must be approved by the City Engineer or designee and comply with the City Engineer's requirements on construction, irrigation, location, and plant type. Provide verification, in writing, of any approvals obtained. Contact Gary Wittwer, DOT Landscape Architect for specific requirements. 5) Revise the development plan to include minimum dimensions for landscape borders and show all walls per DS 2-05.2.4.X. RESUBMITTAL OF ALL PLANS IS REQUIRED. |
| 08/28/2006 | FRODRIG2 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Approved | Transportation Information for Rezoning, Subdivision and Development Review Requests File Number Description Date Reviewed E Pima Association of Governments Sandra C. Holland, Data Services 177 N. Church Avenue, Suite 405 Tucson, AZ 85701 Phone: (520) 792-1093 Fax: (520) 620-6981 www.pagnet.org D06-0033 Walmart Neighborhood Market 8/24/2006 This analysis is designed to allow jurisdictional planning departments to further assess the traffic impacts of planned residential and commerical developments that PAG expects will generate more than 500 average daily trips. Nearby roadway data include planned improvements, existing and future volumes and capacities, and bus and bike accessibility. 1. Nearest Existing or Planned Major Street 2. Is a street improvement planned as part of PAG's 5-Year Transportation Improvement Program? See http://www.pagnet.org/tip/ for more information on the TIP planning process. Planned Action: STREET IDENTIFICATION 3. Existing (2005) Daily Traffic Volume (reported in ADT) See http://www.pagnet.org/TPD/DataTrends/ for more information. 4. Existing (2005) Daily Capacity (reported in ADT) 5. Existing (2005) Number of Lanes 8. Future (2030) Number of Lanes TRANSIT AND BIKEWAYS CONSIDERATIONS 10. Present Bus Service (Route, Frequency, Distance) 11. Existing or Planned Bikeway Remarks: Street Number 1 Street Number 2, if applicable. Year Year Planned Action: VOLUME/CAPACITY/TRAFFIC GENERATION CONSIDERATIONS 6. Future (2030) Daily Volume (reported in ADT) (Assuming planned transportation improvement projects are completed.) 7. Future (2030) Daily Capacity (reported in ADT) Craycroft (22nd to 29th) No 0 21,811 64,140 6 64,140 36,252 6 3,843 Route 34, 30min, 0 miles Bike route with striped shoulder 22nd St (Craycroft to Wilmot) No 0 36,679 64,140 6 44,938 64,140 6 Bike route with striped shoulder 9. Average daily traffic (ADT) forecasted as a result of the proposed development Transportation Information for Rezoning, Subdivision and Development Review Requests File Number Description Date Reviewed E Pima Association of Governments Sandra C. Holland, Data Services 177 N. Church Avenue, Suite 405 Tucson, AZ 85701 Phone: (520) 792-1093 Fax: (520) 620-6981 www.pagnet.org D06-0033 Walmart Neighborhood Market 8/24/2006 This analysis is designed to allow jurisdictional planning departments to further assess the traffic impacts of planned residential and commerical developments that PAG expects will generate more than 500 average daily trips. Nearby roadway data include planned improvements, existing and future volumes and capacities, and bus and bike accessibility. |
| 09/07/2006 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Approved | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT D06-0033 Walmart Neighborhood Market 09/06/06 () Tentative Plat (XXXX) Development Plan (XXXX) Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other CROSS REFERENCE: C9-85-36 and CD9-85-36 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: General Plan GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: COMMENTS DUE BY: 09/11/06 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment (XXXX) Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies () See Additional Comments Attached () No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: () Resubmittal Required: () Tentative Plat () Development Plan () Landscape Plan () Other REVIEWER: D. Estolano 791-4505 DATE: 8/30/06 |
| 09/08/2006 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: D06-0033 WALMART NEIGHBORHOOD MARKET/DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE: September 7, 2006 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: Label section corners on Location Map. Correct NE ½ of Section 21, T-13S, R-13E to NW ¼ of Section 24, T-14S, R-14E in Location Map. Delete direction from all street names in Location Map. And Development Plan (sheets 2 & 3). Delete 5500 E. 22nd Street on sheet 1. Correct Jefferson Ave. to Jefferson Avenue on sheets 2 & 3. Delete Parcel Code from buildings within this Project. jg |
| 09/11/2006 | FRODRIG2 | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Approved | No comment |
| 09/13/2006 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 09/14/2006 | FRODRIG2 | TUCSON WATER NEW AREA DEVELOPMENT | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 09/14/2006 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | DATE: September 14, 2006 TO: Ferne Rodriguez, Development Services FROM: Glenn Hicks Parks and Recreation 791-4873 ext. 215 Glenn.Hicks@tucsonaz.gov CC: SUBJECT: D06-0033 Walmart Neighborhood Market: Development Plan Staff has no comments. |
| 09/14/2006 | ROBERT YOUNG | PIMA COUNTY | PIMA CTY - DEV REVIEW | Passed | |
| 09/14/2006 | JOSE ORTIZ | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Denied | September 14, 2006 ACTIVITY NUMBER: D06-0033 PROJECT NAME: Walmart Neighborhood Market PROJECT ADDRESS: 5500 E 22nd St PROJECT REVIEWER: Jose E. Ortiz PE, Traffic Engineer Resubmittal Required: Traffic Engineering does not recommend approval of the Development Plan; therefore a revised Development Plan is required for re-submittal. The following items must be revised or added to the plan. 1. Include a response letter with the next submittal that states how all comments have been addressed. 2. Traffic Engineering does not support vehicular access directly onto Jefferson Avenue directly from the new development. The two existing driveways along Jefferson Avenue need to be removed. 3. Along Craycroft Road and 22nd Street the four access points do not have to consider the far side SVT's do to the median along Craycroft Road and 22nd Street per Development Standards 3-01 Figure 16. The pedestrian SVT's (20'x30') still need to be illustrated at all driveways. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-4259 x305 or Jose.Ortiz@tucsonaz.gov |
| 09/20/2006 | PAUL MACHADO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | To: Patricia Gehlen DATE: September 20, 2006 CDRC/Zoning Manager SUBJECT: Wal-mart Neighborhood Market, 5500 E. 22nd St. Development Plan D06-0033 (First Review) T14S, R14E, Section 24 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Development Plan and Drainage Report. The Development Plan (DP) and Drainage Report (DR) cannot be approved as submitted. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal. Development Plan: 1. Include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the DP. 2. As per the Federal ADA requirements, all wheel chair ramps shall have the truncated domes instead of the standard grooves that are shown on COT SD 207. Aside from the Truncated Domes, all wheel chair ramps shall be constructed in accordance with COT SD 207. The call-out shall include reference to the Truncated Domes in the key notes. 3. Where are key notes nos. 14 and 32 used on sheet 2? 4. Sheet 3 of 3 of the DP was reviewed as a supplement to the DP and is not considered a grading plan. See comment no. 18. 5. Provide all existing and proposed buildings and structures, including location, size, height, overhangs, canopies, and use per D.S. 2-02.2.1.6. 6. Label existing and future sight visibility triangles per D.S. 2-02.2.1.10. Add the SVT to the intersection of East Juarez St. and South Jefferson Ave. on the proposed project. Consult with the City of Tucson Major Streets and Routes Plan to obtain the correct SVT dimensions at: http://www.tucsonaz.gov/planning/plans/all/msr.pdf. 7. Upon consulting with the City of Tucson Department of Transportation, Permits and Codes Division has recommended that both the ingress/egress at the SE portion of the property has be eliminated in order to reduce the out flow of traffic onto the local neighboring streets. A new sidewalk and vertical curb shall be installed in place of the existing driveway aprons. 8. Fully-dimensioned loading space(s) and maneuvering area(s) for any trash enclosures per D.S. 2-02.2.1.14. 9. Please list estimated cut & fill quantities per D.S. 2-02.2.1.17. 10. Please show dimensioned right-of-way, including any applicable Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Plan right-of-way per D.S. 2-02.2.1.19. Obtain the correct R/W dimensions at: http://www.tucsonaz.gov/planning/plans/all/msr.pdf. 11. Dimension from street monument lines to existing and proposed curbs, sidewalks, driveways, and utility lines per D.S. 2-02.2.1.21. 12. Show all fences, walls, or vegetation for screening and sight visibility by type, material, height, location and spacing per D.S. 2-02.2.1.27. 13. Show Development plan number (D06-0033) on all sheets per D.S. 2-02.2.1.29. 14. Show refuse container location, size, and access thereto fully dimensioned per D.S. 2-02.2.1.32 and D.S. 6-01.0. 15. A permit or a private improvement agreement will be necessary for any work performed within the Right-of-way. Contact Permits and Codes at (520) 791-5100 for permit information. Also see comment no. 3 of the drainage report. 16. Please show a typical cross section of the P.A.A.L. or call out the percentage of slopes. Call out the GB at the D/W, if applicable. 17. Please show the proposed roof drainage patterns, 100% of the 10-year flow must be conveyed under the sidewalks including any other site drainage as well. Please provide supporting calculations to demonstrate compliance with D.S. 3-01.4.4. If the location(s) of the roof scuppers have not yet been decided, a general note indicating sidewalk scuppers will be used when the roof scuppers locations have been designed and located will suffice. 18. Add note: "Depress all landscaped areas 6" maximum for water harvesting". 19. "A grading permit and Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) will be required for this project. Submit 4 sets of grading and SWPPP, with text upon completion and submittal of a grading permit application. A grading permit may not be issued prior to site plan approval. Subsequent comments may be necessary, depending upon the nature and extent of revisions that occur to the plans". Drainage Report: 1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the DR. 2. This review was performed for Tentative Plat purposes only. Final review and acceptance will be at the grading plan stage. 3. Upon consulting with the City of Tucson Department of Transportation, Permits and Codes Division, tapping into the existing underground Stormdrains will not be permitted. An extensive drainage study would be required in order to show that the existing stormdrains would be able to accommodate the flows that are introduced directly into the pipe. Adhering to the existing drainage patterns would be preferred, providing that all other drainage conditions could be met. 4. Include the signed letter from Walter Tellez concurring that the purposed changes constitute a "minor change" from the approved development plan. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550 x1193 or Paul.Machado@ci.tucsonaz.govs Paul P. Machado Senior Engineering Associate City of Tucson/Development Services Department 201 N. Stone Avenue P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210, (520) 791-5550 x1193 office C:/5500 E. 22nd St. CDRC |
| 09/20/2006 | TIM ROWE | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | September 19, 2006 TO: Maolin Zheng BSW International, Inc THRU: Patricia Gehlen City of Tucson, Development Services Department FROM: Chandubhai C. Patel, P.E.. Pima County Development Services Department Development Review Division (Wastewater) SUBJECT: Wal-Mart Neighborhood Market# 4603-00 Development Plan – 1st Submittal D06-033 The proposed sewer collection lines to serve the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. Provide a letter from PCWMD Development Services, written within the past 90 days, stating that the treatment and conveyance system capacity for this project is available. A capacity request form may be found at http://www.pima.gov/wwm/forms/docs/CapResponseRequest.pdf. ALL SHEETS. Add the project number, D06-033, to the title block of each sheet. This number should be shown larger or bolder than any cross-reference numbers. Based on the evaluation of the proposed sewer design, this project qualifies for Standard sewer connection fee rates. SHEET 1 LEGEND: Show legends for both the existing and proposed sewer lines and manholes. Distinguish between the private and public sewer lines. Use these same line types to show the existing and proposed sewer lines on Sheet 3. Sheet 3. Show the PCWMD sewer reach number for the existing sewer where the proposed 8-inch sewer line is to be connected. Sheet 3. Show the lengths of proposed sewers. For reference purpose, Please assign a number to all newly proposed manholes/cleanouts. We will require a revised set of drawings and a response letter addressing each comment. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. The next submittal of this project will be the 2nd submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $50.00 made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. For any questions regarding the fee schedule, please go to http://www.pimaxpress.com/SubDivision/Documents/Fees.PDF where you may find the appropriate wastewater review fees at the bottom of page 1. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. If you have any questions regarding the above comments, please do not hesitate tocontact me. Sincerely, Chandubhai C. Patel, P.E.. Telephone: (520) 740-6563 Copy: Project File |
| 09/21/2006 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES September 21, 2006 Maolin Zheng BSW International Inc., 3420 East Shea Blvd., Suite 200 Tucson, Arizona 85023 Subject: D06-0033 Walmart Neighborhood Market Development Plan Dear Maolin: Your submittal of August 11, 2006 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 7 Copies Revised Development Plan (Zoning, Landscape, Addressing, Traffic, Wastewater, Engineering, DSD ) 4 Copies Revised Landscape Plan (Zoning, Landscape, Engineering, DSD) 2 Copies Revised Drainage Report (Engineering, DSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 791-5608 extension 1179. Sincerely, Patricia Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: (602)953-5106 dp-resubmittal |