Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Permit Number - D06-0031
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 07/17/2006 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 07/25/2006 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | SUBJECT: DESERT CHRISTIAN HIGH SCHOOL D06-0031 Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the development plan submitted July 17, 2006. It appears that there are no apparent conflicts with the existing facilities within the boundaries of this proposed development. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. In order to apply for electric service, call the New Construction Department at (520) 918-8300. Submit a final set of plans including approved site, offsite and electrical load plans. Include a CD with the AutoCAD version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Your final plans should be sent to: Tucson Electric Power Company Attn: Ms. Mary Boice New Business Project Manager P. O. Box 711 (DB-101) Tucson, AZ 85702 520-917-8732 Please call the area Designer Nancy DiMaria at (520) 918-8267, should you have any questions. Sincerely, Kathy Clark Scheduling Coordinator Design/Build kc Enclosures cc: P. Gehlen, City of Tucson N. DiMaria, Tucson Electric Power Kathy Clark Scheduling Coordinator Design/Build 520-918-8271 kclark@tep.com |
| 07/26/2006 | JOSE ORTIZ | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | July 26, 2006 ACTIVITY NUMBER: D06-0031 PROJECT NAME: Desert Christian High School PROJECT ADDRESS: 7777 E Speedway Blvd PROJECT REVIEWER: Jose E. Ortiz PE, Traffic Engineer Traffic Engineering recommends approval of the Development Plan. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-4259 x305 or Jose.Ortiz@tucsonaz.gov |
| 07/26/2006 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 07/31/2006 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Provide copy of the landscape easement for the north portion of the site. Note recording information on the plans. 2) If the proposal is to use the existing wall north of the property line to comply with screening requirements, then joint-use agreement must be provided indicating that the adjacent wall may be used to meet the screening requirement. 3) Clarify the landscape plan regarding the proposed 30" high screen on the north side of the site. A five-foot high screen is required. LUC Table 3.7.2-I 4) Show the oleanders and note the quantity proposed on the north side of the site. DS 2-07.2.2. 5) Revise the plans to show all individual planting for the Prudence Road landscape border and the eastern interior landscape border. 6) Revise the landscape and development plan to correctly note the height of the wall along the east property line. 7) Verify that the irrigation plan is correct in the area of classroom 10A. The irrigation line would not normally be located under the building. 8) The 2004 grading plan included with the submittal does not match the development plan. |
| 08/03/2006 | TIM ROWE | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | August 3, 2006 TO: Philip A. Carhuff, A.I.A. Krebs Carhuff Architects, Inc. THRU: Patricia Gehlen City of Tucson, Development Services Department FROM: Dickie Fernández, E.I.T. Pima County Development Services Department Development Review Division (Wastewater) SUBJECT: Desert Christian High School Development Plan – 1st Submittal D06-0031 The proposed sewer collection lines to serve the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. Provide a letter from PCWWM Planning Services, written within the past 90 days, stating that treatment and conveyance system capacity for this project is available. A capacity request form may be found at http://www.pima.gov/wwm/forms/docs/CapResponseRequest.pdf. ALL SHEETS. Add the project number, D06-0031, to the title block of each sheet. This number should be shown larger or bolder than any cross-reference numbers. Based on the evaluation of the proposed sewer design, this project qualifies for Standard sewer connection fee rates. SHEET 1. Add the following General Note and fill in the blanks appropriately. THIS PROJECT HAS ____ PROPOSED AND ____ EXISTING WASTEWATER FIXTURE UNIT EQUIVALENTS, PER TABLE 13.20.045(E)(1) IN PIMA COUNTY CODE 13.20.045(E). SHEET 1. Add the following General Note MAINTENANCE AND OPERATION OF THE PRIVATE SANITARY SEWER TO ITS POINT OF CONNECTION TO THE PUBLIC SEWER IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE PROPERTY OWNER. SHEET 1. Add the following Permitting Note A PROJECT CONSTRUCTION PERMIT MUST BE SECURED FROM PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT BEFORE BEGINNING ANY WORK ON THIS PROJECT. SHEETS DP-1 & DP-2. Show the six-digit Pima County manhole numbers for all existing public manholes shown on this sheet. SHEETS DP-1 & DP-2. Show the length, size and slope of all newly proposed private sewers. SHEETS DP-1 & DP-2. Please use a different symbol for existing public sewers, existing private sewers and proposed private sewers. Additionally, define the three different symbols in a legend. SHEETS DP-1 & DP-2. Show the rim and invert elevations for all newly proposed private cleanouts. SHEETS DP-1 & DP-2. For reference purposes, please assign a number to all newly proposed private cleanouts. Please explain in writing why proposed buildings 6, 8, 9 and 10A do not show proposed private sewer service. We will require a revised set of drawings and a response letter addressing each comment. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. The next submittal of this project will be the 2nd submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $100.00 made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. For any questions regarding the fee schedule, please go to http://www.pimaxpress.com/SubDivision/Documents/Fees.PDF where you may find the appropriate wastewater review fees at the bottom of page 1. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. If you have any questions regarding the above mentioned comments, please contact me. Sincerely, Dickie Fernández, E.I.T. Telephone: (520) 740-6947 Copy: Project |
| 08/04/2006 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: D06-0031 DESERT CHRISTIAN HIGH SCHOOL/REVISED DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE: 8/04/06 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: Correct Parcel Code to 133-13-005F. Buildings 10A and 10B are unacceptable. Correct to Bldg. 10 and Bldg. 11. Label “Proposed Teacher’s Lounge” as Bldg. 12. Bldg. 10A and 10B do not match Bldg. 10 on Sheet DP-2. Please match the wall division and Bldg. numbers. es |
| 08/10/2006 | PAUL MACHADO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | To: Patricia Gehlen DATE: August 10, 2006 CDRC/Zoning Manager SUBJECT: 7777 E. Speedway Blvd., Desert Christian HS. Development Plan D06-0031 (First Review) T14S, R15E, Section 05 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Development Plan. The Development Plan (DP). Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal. Development Plan: 1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the DP. 2. Attached to the present DP submittal are the comments from the second submittal of the original DP reviewed in July of 2004, the comments were not addressed and shall be revised in the current DP under review. 3. The current DP does not match actual field conditions. For example, buildings already constructed are called out as proposed. Revise as required. Drainage Report addendum: 1. DR addendum's are no longer accepted. Generate a DR or incorporate the DR addendum into the original DR and submit it along with the corrected DP. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550 x1193 or Paul.Machado@tucsonaz.gov Paul P. Machado Senior Engineering Associate City of Tucson/Development Services Department 201 N. Stone Avenue P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210 (520) 791-5550 x1193 office (520) 879-8010 fax, C:/ 7777 E. Speedway Blvd. CDRC To: Craig Gross DATE: July 14, 2004 Planning Administrator SUBJECT: 7525 E. Speedway Blvd., Desert Christian HS. Development Plan D99-0042 (Second Review) T14S, R15E, Section 05 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Development Plan. The Development Plan (DP). Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal. Development Plan: 1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the DP. 2. The information requested by this review is required to be on the DP. The grading plan is a separate entity with a separate activity number. The grading plan information can be used by the DP if it is made a part of the set, for example DP-3. However a Grading will be still be required. 3. Please provide Drainage patterns and finished grades per D.S. 2-02.2.1.16. Please show the drainage patterns at a minimum on the DP. Per previous comment. 4. Please list estimated cut & fill quantities per D.S. 2-02.2.1.17. Please show on DP. The grading application was not included with this submittal. Per previous comment. 5. Dimension from street monument lines to existing and proposed curbs, sidewalks, driveways, and utility lines per D.S. 2-02.2.1.21. Please show future right-of-way, SVT and curb location per the City of Tucson Major Streets and Routes plan. Per previous comment. 6. Please provide existing topographic contours at intervals not exceeding two (2) feet and/or spot elevations as pertinent and Bench Mark based on City of Tucson Datum, including City Field Book and page number per D.S. 2-02.2.1.23. The Bench Mark must be shown on the DP. Per previous comment. 7. Show refuse container location, size, and access thereto fully dimensioned per D.S. 2-02.2.1.32 and D.S. 6-01.0. Environmental Services may require the addition of a dumpster, please contact John Clark @ 791-5543. 8. A permit or a private improvement agreement will be necessary for any work performed within the Right-of-way. Contact Permits and Codes at (520) 791-5100 for permit information. It seems there is sidewalk connecting to the existing sidewalk on Prudence Rd. in the right-of-way. This comment is intended for information purposes only. 9. Please show a typical cross section of the P.A.A.L. or call out the percentage of slopes. Call out the GB at the D/W, if applicable. Please show drainage patterns at the minimum on the DP. Per previous comment. 10. Please show the proposed roof drainage patterns, 100% of the 10-year flow must be conveyed under the sidewalks including any other site drainage as well. Please provide supporting calculations to demonstrate compliance with D.S. 3-01.4.4. If the location(s) of the roof scuppers have not yet been decided, a general note indicating sidewalk scuppers will be used when the roof scuppers locations have been designed and located will suffice. Please add note to DP. Per previous comment. 11. Add note: "Depress all landscaped areas 6" maximum for water harvesting". This note must be shown on the DP. Per previous comment. 12. Please list the area of disturbance. A Grading and Stormwater pollution prevention plan is required. Contact Paul P. Machado at 791-5550 x1193 for additional information. A separate grading submittal will be required. The information I have requested is intended to determine if grading submittal is necessary. Please list in area in SF. Per previous comment. Drainage Report addendum: 1. The DR addendum is accepted for DP purposes only. The final review will be done at the Grading plan stage. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550 x1193 or Paul.Machado@ci.tucsonaz.govs Paul P. Machado Senior Engineering Associate City of Tucson/Development Services Department 201 N. Stone Avenue P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210 (520) 791-5550 x1193 office (520) 879-8010 fax C:/ 7525 E. Speedway Blvd. CDRC 2 |
| 08/15/2006 | JCLARK3 | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Approved | * No known landfill with in 1000 feet of this development. * Dumpster enclosure is existing and is approved for service and accesibility. * No provisions for recycling. |
| 08/22/2006 | KAROL ARAGONEZ | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Karol Aragonez Planner PROJECT: D06-0031 Desert Christian High School Development Plan TRANSMITTAL DATE: July 17, 2006 DUE DATE: August 14, 2006 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is July 16, 2007. 2. The current legend has been cut off. Please provide a complete legend on the development plan. DS 2-05.2.1.J 3. Please provide a copy of the zoning ordinance listing all conditions of rezoning from case number C9-99-06. List all applicable conditions of rezoning on the development plan. DS 2-05.2.1.K & DS 2-05.2.2.B.2 4. Please list as a general note "Existing zoning is O-3", as general note 1, even though this information has been provided as part of the development designator. DS 2-05.2.2.B.1 5. Case number D06-0031 has been assigned to this development plan (DP). Please place this number in the right corner of all sheets of the development plan, landscape plan, NPPO, and any other associated sheets. DS 2-05.2.2.B.2 6. Please list all zoning variances or modifications that are applicable to the project such as Board of Adjustment, Project Design Options, etc. Provide the case number, date of approval, what was approved, and conditions of approval. If none exist provide response to reviewer's comments. Provide a separate response letter detailing compliance with rezoning conditions. DS 2-05.2.2.B.6 7. Please provide the gross area of the site by square footage and acreage as a general note. DS 2-05.2.2.B.11 8. Please draw all existing easements on the plan along with recordation information, location, width, and purpose. If an easement is no longer in use and scheduled to be vacated or has been abandoned, so indicate. If none exist provide response to reviewer's comments. Also if easements are purposed please draw, dimension and label as to their purpose and whether they will be public or private. If none exist provide response to reviewer's comments. DS 2-05.2.3.B & DS 2-05.2.4.G 9. Please provide type and dimension width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks within both Speedway Boulevard and Prudence Road. Abutting sidewalks must comply with accessibility requirements for the physically disabled. DS 2-05.2.3.C & DS 2-05.2.4.L 10. Please list zoning for the south side of Speedway Boulevard (O-3) and west side of Prudence Road (O-3). DS 2-05.2.4.B 11. Please provide a detail of both a standards parking space and a handicap parking space. Refer to development standard 3-05.0 for design criteria for standard parking and the Uniform Building Code for handicap parking criteria. Once provided and reviewed further comments may result. DS 2-05.2.4.P 12. Please provide a dimensioned detail for class 2 bicycle parking spaces. Be aware that that development standard 2-09 has been revised. Once provided and reviewed further comments may result. The revised standards can be found at the DSD web site: http://www.tucsonaz.gov/dsd/Codes___Ordinances/DevStd209.pdf 13. Please indicate the location and type of postal service to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements. If mail is to be delivered to an area with a building please state so on the plan. DS 2-05.2.4.V 14. Indicate the locations and types of proposed signs (wall, freestanding, pedestal) to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements and that minimal locational requirements can be met. Also indicate if there are existing billboards on site. Billboards will be required to meet all LUC requirements as stated in LUC Sec. 3.5.4.26. If none exists please state so. DS 2-05.2.4.W & LUC 3.5.4.26 15. Please provide as part of the lot coverage calculation the breakdown of building square footage and vehicle use area to allow verification of calculations. 16. In perimeter yard notes, please remove information provided in parenthesis for side yard that reads (also correlates to 21' developing area setback from outside edge of the nearest adjacent travel lane). 17. Please correct perimeter yard note pertaining to the rear yard setback. Per LUC Sec. 3.5.3.7.F the minimum building setback from all property lines adjacent to R-3 or more restrictive zoning is twenty (20) feet, unless setback requirements of the applicable development designator is greater. LUC 3.5.3.7.F 18. Please provide passenger drop-off area calculations. Drop-off spaces shall be provided at a ratio of one (1) motor vehicle parking space (parallel) for every twenty (20) students for which the school is authorized, up to a total of eight (8) spaces. LUC 3.5.3.7.G 19. Educational uses within Neighborhood Commercial (NC) or more restrictive zoning (O-3) are limited in hours of operation to 6:00 am to 7:00 p.m., Monday through Friday only. Please add note indicating such. LUC 3.5.3.7.C 20. Please provide licensing from the State of Arizona for the use which includes the number of students for which the school is approved. LUC 3.5.3.7.A 21. Dimensions shown for the passenger drop-off spaces are to be the length of a parallel parking space, which is twenty-three (23) feet long, and eight (8) feet wide. Lengths shown on the plan are twenty-two (22) feet, six (6) inches. Please correct. The drop-off space shown at twenty-eight (28) feet one (1) inch is measured on the diagonal and not the full space length. Please correct. DS 3-05.2.1.B.2 and LUC 3.5.3.7.G 22. Please dimension all sidewalks within site. Minimum width for sidewalks is four (4) feet and meets all requirements per Development Standard 2-08.5.1. DS 2-08.5.1. 23. Detectable warnings (truncated domes) are required at marked crossings (crosswalks). The area covered by the truncated domes shall be twenty-four (24) inch deep and extend the full width of the crosswalk, preceding the crosswalk. This will be required for the pedestrian path provided from Speedway Boulevard through the parking lot to the main building. Truncated domes are also required for all curb ramps. These shall be a minimum of twenty-four (24) inches in the direction of travel and extend the full width of the curb ramp or flush surface. They shall be located so the edge nearest the curb line is six (6) inches to eight (8) inched from the curb line. Truncated domes will also be required preceding all access aisles to handicap parking spaces. ANSI 406.12 24. Of the nine (9) accessible parking spaces provided two (2) must be van accessible. 25. Please dimension all PAALs on site. The minimum width for a two-way PAAL is twenty-four (24) feet with a minimum height clearance of fifteen (15) feet. DS 3-05.2.1.C.1 & DS 3-05.2.1.C.4.a 26. Those PAALs designated as a fire lane or used as access lanes for refuse collection or loading zones, a minimum unobstructed radius of eighteen (18) feet is required where they intersect another PAAL. Please demonstrate on plan that this criteria can be met. DS 3-05.2.1.C.3.a If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Karol Aragonez, (520) 791-5550. KAA C:\planning\cdrc\developmentplan\D06-0031dp.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development plan, tentative plat, final plat, CC&R's and additional requested documents. |
| 08/28/2006 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Approved | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT D06-0031 Desert Christian High School July 17, 2006 () Tentative Plat (X) Development Plan (X) Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other CROSS REFERENCE: C9-99-06 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Pantano East Area Plan GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: No COMMENTS DUE BY: August 14, 2006 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment (X) Proposal Complies with Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies () See Additional Comments Attached () No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: REVIEWER: de/msp 791-4505 DATE: August 25, 2006 |
| 08/30/2006 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES August 30, 2006 Philip A. Carhuff, AIA Krebs Carhuff Architects, Inc. 3149 East Prince Road, Suite 151 Tucson, Arizona 85716 Subject: D06-0031 Desert Christen High School Development Plan Dear Phil: Your submittal of July 17, 2006 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 6 Copies Revised Development Plan (Landscape, Wastewater, Addressing, Engineering, Zoning, DSD ) 4 Copies Revised Landscape Plan (Landscape, Engineering, Zoning, DSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 791-5608 extension 1179. Sincerely, Patricia Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 577-4599 dp-resubmittal |
| 08/30/2006 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | April 28, 2008 Philip Carhuff Krebs Carhuff Architects 3149 East Prince Road Suite 151 Tucson, AZ 85716 SUBJECT: CLOSURE OF CDRC FILE Development Plan Per Section 5.3.8.2.A, Expiration Dates, of the Land Use Code, "an applicant has one (1) year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A development plan application that has been in review for a period of one (1) year which has not been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a development plan for the property, a new development plan which complies with regulations in effect at that time must be submitted. The new submittal initiates a new one (1) year review period." Case # Case Name DSD Transmittal Date D06-0031 Jim Click Automotive July 17, 2006 Please note that this case has been closed and that, in order to continue review of the project, new development plan/tentative plat application is required which comply with regulations in effect at the time of the new submittals. CDRC members should be advised of their ability to review the new applications per the current regulations. Thank you for your assistance. Sincerely, Patricia Y. Gehlen CDRC Manager xc: CDRC file D06-0031 ……. |