Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Permit Number - D06-0030
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06/30/2006 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 07/06/2006 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Revise the notes regarding the east landscape border on sheet 1 of the landscape plan. The width of the border is the area between the property line and the screen. Coverage requirements require adjustment. DS 2-06.3.4.C.2 2) The emergency/construction entrance from Pantano Road is required to be paved per LUC 3.3.7.3. 3) The entire site is subject to the dust control provisions of LUC 3.7.2.7. Provide information on the landscape plan regarding compliance. 4) The dust control requirements also apply in the adjacent right-of-way areas per LUC 3.7.2.4.A.4. Revise as necessary. 5) The use may not have any service or storage yards per 2.5.4.I.1. 6) All lettering and dimensions shall be the equivalent of twelve (0.12") point or greater in size per DS 2-05.2.1.A. Revise shhets D4 & D5 and any others as necessary. 7) Revise note six on sheet 1 of the landscape plan to refer to the correct jurisdiction. Revise note 5 on sheet 1 of the native plant preservation plan to identify the Development Services Landscape Section as the recipient of the copies of the monitoring reports. |
| 07/07/2006 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | NO COMMENT D06-0030 THE PLANNING CENTER PANTANO SUBSTATION -------------------------------------------------------- Confidentiality and Nondisclosure Notice: This email transmission and any attachments are intended for use by the person(s)/entity(ies) named above and may contain confidential/privileged information. Any unauthorized use, disclosure or distribution is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by e-mail, and delete or destroy all copies plus attachments. |
| 07/07/2006 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 07/12/2006 | JCLARK3 | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Approved | * No landfill with in 1000 feet of this development. * Electrical Substation. No refuse service required. |
| 07/18/2006 | RICHARD WILLIAMSON | TUCSON WATER NEW AREA DEVELOPMENT | REVIEW | Approved | WATER SUPPLY Tucson Water has been designated by the State of Arizona, Department of Water Resources, as having an assured water supply. This does not mean that water service is currently available to the proposed development. This development lies within the exterior boundary of Tucson Water's planned 50-year service area. Therefore, water supply is assured. WATER SERVICE The approval of water meter applications is subject to the availability of water service at the time an application is made. The developer shall be required to submit a water master plan identifying but not limited to: Water Use Fire Flow Requirements Offsite / Onsite Water Facilities Loops and Proposed Connection Points to Existing Water System Easements / Common Areas Any specific area plan fees, protected main / facility fees and / or other needed facilities' cost are to be paid by the developer. If the existing water system is not capable of meeting the requirements of the proposed development, the developer shall be fiscally responsible for modifying/enhancing the existing water system to meet those needs. This letter shall be null and void one year from the date of issuance. Issuance of this letter is not to be construed as agency approval of a water plan or as containing construction review comments relative to conflicts with existing water lines and the proposed development. If you have any questions, please call New Development at 791-4718. Sincerely, Richard S. Williamson, P.E. Manager, New Development RW:bjh |
| 07/24/2006 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | SUBJECT: PANTANO SUBSTATION D06-0030 Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the development plan dated June 30, 2006. Liza Castillo Right of Way Agent Land Management Tucson Electric Power Co. (520) 917-8745 lcastillo@tep.com |
| 07/24/2006 | TIM ROWE | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | July 23, 2006 TO: Robin Valenzuela The Planning Center THRU: Patricia Gehlen City of Tucson, Development Services Department FROM: Dickie Fernández, E.I.T. Pima County Development Services Department Development Review Division (Wastewater) SUBJECT: TEP Pantano Substation Development Plan – 1st Submittal D06-0030 The proposed sewer collection lines to serve the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. This review is being completed under the assumption that there are no proposed sewers or existing on-site sewers within the project boundaries. Based on this assumption, the following comments are relevant due to the fact that an existing sewer easement lies within the project boundaries. ALL SHEETS. Add the project number, D06-0030, to the title block of each sheet. This number should be shown larger or bolder than any cross-reference numbers. SHEET 1. Add the following General Note THERE ARE NO SEWERS ON-SITE AND THERE ARE NO PROPOSED SEWERS FOR THIS PROJECT. For accuracy purposes, please show the following existing public sewer infrastructure that is on this sheet: Existing sewer lines on Lakeside Parkway and Pantano Road. Size of these existing public sewers. Pima County plan number for these existing public sewers. Six-digit Pima County manhole number for all existing public manholes on this sheet. We will require a revised set of drawings and a response letter addressing each comment. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. The next submittal of this project will be the 2nd submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $50.00 made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. For any questions regarding the fee schedule, please go to http://www.pimaxpress.com/SubDivision/Documents/Fees.PDF where you may find the appropriate wastewater review fees at the bottom of page 1. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. If you have any questions regarding the above mentioned comments, please contact me. Sincerely, Dickie Fernández, E.I.T. Telephone: (520) 740-6947 Copy: Project |
| 07/26/2006 | JOSE ORTIZ | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Denied | July 26, 2006 ACTIVITY NUMBER: D06-0030 PROJECT NAME: Pantano Substation PROJECT ADDRESS: 7960 E Lakeside Parkway PROJECT REVIEWER: Jose E. Ortiz PE, Traffic Engineer Resubmittal Required: Development Plan The following items must be revised or added to the plan. 1. Include a response letter with the next submittal that states how all comments have been addressed. 2. Ensure there is 80' of separation between the proposed driveways. 3. Provide a 40' offset from the proposed driveways to the property line. 4. Callout standard aprons for the proposed driveways. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-4259 x305 or Jose.Ortiz@tucsonaz.gov |
| 07/28/2006 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Approved | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: D06-0030 PANTANO SUBSTATION/DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE: 7/28/06 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and we hereby approve this project. NOTE: Submit a 24 x 36 Reverse Reading Double Matte Photo Mylar of approved Development Plan to City Planning. Signed and dated Mylar will be forwarded to Pima County Addressing prior to assignment of addresses. 2.) All addresses will need to be displayed per Pima County Address Standards at the time of final inspection. ES |
| 07/28/2006 | FRODRIG2 | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Approved | No Comment |
| 08/02/2006 | JASON GREEN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: August 1, 2006 SUBJECT: Engineering review of TEP Pantano Substation- Development Plan TO: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager LOCATION: 7960 E Lakeside PW, T14S R15E Sec28, Ward 2 REVIEWERS: Jason Green, CFM ACTIVITY: D06-0030 SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Development Services Department has received the proposed development plan and the submitted drainage report. Engineering Division has reviewed the submitted development plan and drainage report and does not recommend approval of the development plan at this time. The drainage report was reviewed for development plan purposes only. The following items need to be addressed: Development Plan: 1) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.N: Revise the development plan to show locations and footprints of all proposed structures as shown on the submitted Drainage Report for Tucson Electric Power Company Pantano Site prepared by Arroyo Engineering, LLC, dated June 17, 2006. A geotechnical report will also be required, refer to comments made in the Drainage Report and Geotechnical Report paragraphs. 2) DS Sec.2-05.2.1.C: Revise the legal description under the project location map so that all lettering is the equivalent of 12 point or greater to assure legibility when reproduced or photographically reduced. 3) DS Sec.2-05.2.1.D.2: Revise the project location map to include all major watercourses (Kinnison and Atterbury Wash) along with the Book and Page of any subdivision that lies within the project location map area. 4) DS Sec.2-05.2.1.K: The correct development plan number (D06-0030) may be added to the lower right hand corner of the plan where indicated by the "Case NO.___". 5) DS Sec.2-05.2.3.A: Revise the development plan to include site boundary information. Include bearing in degrees, minutes, and seconds, with the basis of bearing noted together with distance in feet. 6) DS Sec.3-01.3.2.C: Depict and label 18-feet radii concrete curbs per City of Tucson/Pima County Standard Detail 213 (PC/COT SD 213) at all of the driveway entrances. The curbs should be constructed at the edge of pavement, which must also be depicted on the development plan. Curb returns must be constructed entirely within the subject parcel and all proposed driveways must be a minimum of 20 feet apart. 7) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.D.3: Provide cross-section details for all parking area access lanes (PAALs) on the development plan. PAALs must be designed in accordance with Sec.3.3.0 of the Land Use Code (LUC) and DS Sec.3-04.0. Provide dimensions of parking spaces for all PAAL according to DS Sec.3-05.2.4, show the minimum standard parking space size of 8'-6" X 18' or label the wheel stop curbing, refer to Fig 5 DS Sec.3-05.2.3.C.2. 8) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.G: Revise the development plan to show all easements for utilities, drainage, access, etc. and label as to their purpose and whether they will be public or private. 9) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.H: Provide on the development plan all information associated with the drainage report. The following information must be indicated on the development plan: a) provide the specific PC/COT standard detail for the type of sidewalk scuppers that are used for conveying the roof drainage under the pedestrian sidewalk. The scuppers proposed under the sidewalk will be designed and constructed to convey the 10-year flood flow. Provide a revised drainage report showing scupper calculations that demonstrate that the 10-year flood flow is contained under the sidewalk; b) revise the development plan to show the 100-year ponding limits with water surface elevations within the proposed basin. The water surface elevations shown on the development plan must be verified within the revised drainage report. 10) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.K: Provide a continuous pedestrian circulation path that connects all public access areas of the proposed building and the proposed circulation path located on both Pantano Road and Lakeside Parkway. 11) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.L: Revise the development plan to show a detail for the handicap accesses ramps. Truncated domes are required for all proposed handicap access ramps. 12) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.O: Provide the required maneuvering area for all loading zones that are shown on the development plan. Refer to AASHTO for the national standards for turning radii. 13) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.R: Label the dimensions for the sight visibility triangles (SVT) shown on the development plan. 14) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.T: Revise the detail dimensions for refuse containers, the enclosure must have a minimum inside clear dimension of 10 feet by 10 feet between bollards that are required between the container and the enclosure's rear and sidewall. Refer to DS Sec.6-01.4.2 for specifications and requirements on access, placement of containers, bin enclosure and construction. 15) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.T: Show maneuverability for all refuse containers for the refuse vehicles in plan view. 16) DS Sec.11-01.2.1: Provide estimated cut and fill quantities on the development plan for grading plan purposes. 17) DS Sec.3-01.3.3.B.5: Provide a minimum 5-foot wide pedestrian circulation around the entire proposed structure, sidewalks must be physically separated from any vehicular travel lane (proposed location of loading zone) by means of curbing, grade separation, railing, or barriers. Refer to DS Sec.3-01.3.3 for pedestrian circulation paths. 18) DS 10-02.0, Section 14.3.2: Provide a note on the development plan stating that, (a) the owner or owners shall be solely responsible for operation, maintenance, and liability for drainage structures and detention basins; (b) that the owner or owners shall have an Arizona Registered Professional Civil Engineer prepare a certified inspection report for the drainage and detention/retention facilities at lease once each year, and that these regular inspection reports will be on file with the owner for review by City staff, upon written request; (c) that City staff may periodically inspect the drainage and retention/detention facilities to verify that scheduled and unscheduled maintenance activities are being performed adequately; and (d) that the owner or owners agree to reimburse the City for any and all costs associated with the maintaining of the drainage and detention/retention facilities, should the City find the owner or owners deficient in their obligation to adequately operate and maintain their facilities." DRAINAGE REPORT: 19) DS Sec.2-03.2.4.K: A Geotechnical Report is required for this project due to the proposed basins. The soils report needs to discuss suitability and feasibility of the project. Description of existing soil constraints for the site, structural design recommendations, pavement design section, and other typical geotechnical data is needed. The soils report shall provide identification / assessment of any potentially hazardous geotechnical areas, provide proposed recommendations for setbacks from building to drainage areas include minimum distance from foundations to drainage swales, and provide infiltration test results. The geotechnical report shall specifically address all criteria listed in this section. See last sentence of this section for items 6 (c) & (d) regarding hydro-collapsing soils and 30-foot test boring for basin design. Recommendations need to be incorporated into the development plan and drainage report. 20) Further comments may be required at resubmittal of the development plan and geotechnical report. GEOTECHNICAL REPORT: 21) DS Sec.10-01.III.3.5.1.3.a, 10-02.14.2.6: A geotechnical evaluation needs to be submitted for review, addressing the following: a) Soils report should provide conformance with DS section 10-02.14.2.6 regarding 30-foot boring for basin, and provide discussion of potential for hydro-collapsible soils and any recommendation for setbacks from building to basin. b) The soils report shall provide identification / assessment of any potentially hazardous geotechnical areas, and state any geotechnical recommendations and whether there are special provisions for the soil preparation for this development. c) Provide slope stability recommendations for any proposed constructed slopes. d) Provide pavement structure design recommendations. GRADING PLAN: 22) DS Sec.11-01.2.1: A grading permit may be required for this project depending on the cut and fill quantities provided at resubmittal. If fill quantities exceed 50 cubic yards a grading plan and a grading permit application will be required after development plan approval and prior to any construction activity. A grading permit may not be issued prior to development plan approval. Subsequent comments may be necessary, depending upon the nature and extent of revisions that occur to the development plans 23) Please ensure that any future grading plan will be consistent with the development plan and drainage report. Grading standards may be accessed at: http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/DevStandsTOC.pdf 24) Arizona Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (AZPDES) requirements are applicable to this project. Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans (SWPPP) and text addressing stormwater controls for all areas affected by construction activities related to this development will be required with a grading plan submittal. For further information, visit www.adeq.state.az.us/environ/water/permits/stormwater.html. 25) If fill quantities exceed 50 cubic yards provide a general note on the development plan that references the City of Tucson Development Standard 11-01.0 (excavation and grading requirements). GENERAL COMMENTS: Please provide a revised development plan, a revised drainage report, and a geotechnical report that address the comments provided above. Include a comprehensive response letter addressing in detail responses to all of the above comments. Further comments may be generated upon resubmittal of the development plan, drainage report, and geotechnical report reviews. For any questions or to schedule a meeting, call me at 791-5550, extension 1189. Jason Green, CFM Senior Engineer Associate Engineering Division Development Services |
| 08/10/2006 | FRODRIG2 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Approved | Transportation Information for Rezoning, Subdivision, and Development Requests No Transportation Impact Report The following projects do not have any transportation impacts associated with them. Delivered to: Development Services – City of Tucson Date Delivered: 7/28/2006 Case Number Project Name Pima Association of Governments Kristen Zimmerman, Data Services 177 N. Church Ave., Suite 405, Tucson, Arizona 85701-1127 (520) 792-1093 FAX (520) 620-6981 D06-0030 Pantano Substation |
| 08/10/2006 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | DATE: August 09, 2006 TO: Ferne Rodriguez, Development Services FROM: Glenn Hicks Parks and Recreation 791-4873 ext. 215 Glenn.Hicks@tucsonaz.gov CC: SUBJECT: D06-0030 Pantano Substation: Development Plan(6-30-06) Staff has no comments. |
| 08/28/2006 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Approved | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT D06-0030 Pantano Substation 08/28/06 () Tentative Plat (XXXX) Development Plan () Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other CROSS REFERENCE: NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: South Pantano GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: COMMENTS DUE BY: 07/31/06 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment (XXXX) Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies () See Additional Comments Attached () No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: () Resubmittal Required: () Tentative Plat () Development Plan () Landscape Plan () Other REVIEWER: DCD 791-4505 DATE: 07/21/06 |
| 08/30/2006 | KAROL ARAGONEZ | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Karol Aragonez Planner PROJECT: D06-0030 Pantano Substation Development Plan TRANSMITTAL DATE: June 30, 2006 DUE DATE: July 31, 2006 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is June 29, 2007. 2. Please increase the lettering size use with the location map to a minimum of twelve (0.12) point. DS 2-05.2.1.C 3. Please add the contour interval below the north arrow/scale. DS 2-05.2.1.H 4. Please add to general note 2 as the proposed use "Distribution System, Subject to LUC Sec. 3.5.11.1.A, E, & I". DS 2-05.2.2.B.3 & LUC 2.5.4.2.I.1 5. Please correct general note 3 to read "Overlay Zone" instead of "Setback Zone". 6. Please draw all existing easements on the plan along with recordation information, location, width, and purpose. If an easement is no longer in use and scheduled to be vacated or has been abandoned, so indicate. If none exist provide response to reviewer's comments. Also if easements are purposed please draw, dimension and label as to their purpose and whether they will be public or private. If none exist provide response to reviewer's comments. DS 2-05.2.3.B & DS 2-05.2.4.G 7. Please dimension the width of paving and curbs for Pantano Road and Lakeside Parkway. DS 2-05.2.3.C 8. This site contains two (2) separate parcels therefore you will need to show how the parcels can work as stand alone parcels if sold separately or provide a Pima County Tax Parcel Combo and a record covenant regarding development and use of real property. Forms may be found at http://www.tucsonaz.gov/dsd/Forms_Fees___Maps/Applications/applications.html DS 2-05.2.4.A 9. Please add the adjacent zoning of lot 9 as C-2. DS 2-05.2.4.B 10. Please revise general note 5, which currently references GFA. By definition GFA is the sum of the horizontal areas of all floors of all buildings, including accessory buildings on a lot. Area covered by equipment should be defined as square footage of area for the purpose of lot coverage only, not required by development designator "30". Continuing to label equipment area, as GFA would imply having to supply off-street loading or parking that is in reality not required. Please revise. LUC 6.2.7 11. Required motor vehicle parking for distribution system is one (1) space per five hundred (500) feet of GFA with a minimum of two (2) spaces to be provided. Of those two (2) spaces one (1) must be handicap van accessible accessed by a twenty-four (24) foot wide PAAL if ninety (90) degrees. Both access drives into the site from Pantano and Lakeside Parkway must be a minimum of twenty-four (24) feet wide to accommodate two-way traffic unless one-way drives (one in, one out) are proposed. Vehicle use area within the site must be surfaced with asphaltic concrete, cement concrete, or penetration treatment of bituminous material and seal coat of bituminous binder and mineral aggregate. LUC 3.3.4, LUC 3.3.7.3, DS 3-05.2.1.C.1, & DS 3-05.6.0 Table 1 12. Even though pedestrian traffic is not allow does not mean it is not required. Within all development, a continuous pedestrian circulation path is required connecting all public access areas of the development to the pedestrian path in any adjacent street. At least one (1) sidewalk will be provided to a project from each street which the project has frontage. Sidewalks shall be flood free for all storm discharges of up to a ten (10) year flood event. Sidewalks will be a minimum of four (4) feet wide and installed to avoid any obstruction. Cross slope on all sidewalks will not exceed two (2) percent. DS 2-08.3.1, DS 2-08.4.1, & DS 2-08.5.1 13. Please correct notes on DP for the north and south property line to indicate compliance to LUC 3.5.11.1.A.I. LUC 3.5.11.1.A.I 14. Please add matrix providing development designator "30" requirements stating site area, FAR, and building height as required and proposed and listing required and proposed setbacks. LUC 3.2.3.2.B & LUC 3.2.6.4 15. Indicate if there are existing billboards on site. Billboards will be required to meet all LUC requirements as stated in LUC Sec. 3.5.4.26. If none exists please state so. LUC 3.5.4.26 If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Karol Aragonez, (520) 791-5550. KAA C:\planning\cdrc\developmentplan\D006-0030dp.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development plan and additional requested documents. |
| 08/31/2006 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES August 31, 2006 Robin Valenzuela The Planning Center 110 South Church Avenue, Suite 6320 Tucson, Arizona 85701 Subject: D06-0030 Pantano Substation Development Plan Dear Robin: Your submittal of June 30, 2006 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 6 Copies Revised Development Plan (Landscape, Wastewater, Traffic, Engineering, Zoning, DSD ) 4 Copies Revised Landscape Plan (Landscape, Engineering, Zoning, DSD) 2 Copies Revised NPPO Plan (Landscape, DSD) 2 Copies Revised Drainage Report (Engineering, DSD) 2 Copies Geotechnical Report (Engineering, DSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 791-5608 extension 1179. Sincerely, Patricia Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 622-1950 |