Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Permit Number - D06-0025
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06/09/2006 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 06/12/2006 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | The Landscape Section does not recommend approval of the plans at this time due to inconsistencies with adopted codes and standards. The plan was reviewed for compliance with the Land Use Code (LUC), Development Standards (DS) and other applicable standards and guidelines referred to in the comments. Revise the plans as necessary to comply. The Native Plant Preservation application is approved. 1) Basin slopes are required to have slopes no steeper than 4:1 where depths exceed three feet, 3:1 for unprotected slopes and 2: 1 for protected slopes for depths less than three feet. DS 10-01. 2) Revise the landscape and development plans to provide consistent information. Note the slope ratios and the depth of retention basins. DS 2-07.2.2.B 3) Show any required screen walls on the development plan. DS 2-05.2.4.X Screening is required along the street, east property line, and for the refuse storage and vehicular use areas. LUC Table 3.7.2-I 4) The wall required along the east property line is required to provide effective screening five feet at all points above the finished grade of the vehicular use area. LUC 3.7.3.3 5) Vegetation or structures higher than thirty (30) inches must be located outside of the sight visibility triangle. Revise the plan to relocate Lantana horrida and Dasylirion Wheeleri. 6) Revise the plans as necessary to provide the required coverage for the Renaissance Drive street landscape border. The plant count within the ten foot wide border appears to be is low. LUC 3.7.2.4.A.5 7) Grading, hydrology, and landscape structural plans are to be integrated to make maximum use of site storm water runoff for supplemental on-site irrigation purposes. The landscape plan shall indicate use of all runoff, from individual catch basins around single trees to basins accepting flow from an entire vehicular use area or roof area. LUC 3.7.4.3.B The water harvesting retention volume designed to meet the requirement for water harvesting may be credited toward threshold retention volume requirements. If water harvesting areas retain the entire stormwater volume for the 2-, 5-, 10- and/or 100-year flood events generated within the water harvesting areas themselves, the surface area of the water harvesting area may be deducted from the watershed area used to calculate required detention/retention quantities or volumes for those events. See Engineering comments. 8) Revise the landscape plan to show the extent of supplementary irrigation in each planting area, provided by water harvesting methods and the points of drainage off roof areas and parking areas, amount of flow, and disposition of flow. Refer to the Water Harvesting Guidance Manual for additional information. http://dot.tucsonaz.gov/stormwater/downloads/2006WaterHarvesting.pdf 9) Revise the landscape and development plans to eliminate conflicts between planting areas and pedestrian routes. DS 2-07.2.1.A, DS 2-05.2.4.K RESUBMITTAL OF ALL PLANS IS REQUIRED. |
| 06/12/2006 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 06/16/2006 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | NO COMMENT D06-0025 TETRA TECH INC TUCSON COMMUNITY CHURCH -------------------------------------------------------- Confidentiality and Nondisclosure Notice: This email transmission and any attachments are intended for use by the person(s)/entity(ies) named above and may contain confidential/privileged information. Any unauthorized use, disclosure or distribution is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by e-mail, and delete or destroy all copies plus attachments. |
| 06/23/2006 | JCLARK3 | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Approved | * No known landfill with in 1000 feet of this development. * Requested a detail of the enclosure from the Engineer, Ray Brown. |
| 06/26/2006 | TIM ROWE | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | June 23, 2006 TO: Ray Brown Tetra Tech, Inc. THRU: Patricia Gehlen City of Tucson, Development Services Department FROM: Dickie Fernández, E.I.T. Pima County Development Services Department Development Review Division (Wastewater) SUBJECT: Tucson Community Church Development Plan – 1st Submittal D06-0025 The proposed sewer collection lines to serve the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. Provide a letter from PCWWM Planning Services, written within the past 90 days, stating that treatment and conveyance system capacity for this project is available. A capacity request form may be found at http://www.pima.gov/wwm/forms/docs/CapResponseRequest.pdf. ALL SHEETS. Add the project number, D06-0025, to the title block of each sheet. This number should be shown larger or bolder than any cross-reference numbers. Based on the evaluation of the proposed sewer design, this project qualifies for Standard sewer connection fee rates. SHEET 1. Revise General Note 11 and fill in the blanks appropriately. THIS PROJECT HAS ____ PROPOSED AND ____ EXISTING WASTEWATER FIXTURE UNIT EQUIVALENTS, PER TABLE 13.20.045(E)(1) IN PIMA COUNTY CODE 13.20.045(E). SHEET 1. Add the following General Note ANY WASTEWATER DISCHARGED INTO THE PUBLIC SANITARY SEWERAGE SYSTEM SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE INDUSTRIAL WASTE ORDINANCE (PIMA COUNTY ORDINANCE NO. 1991-140, AS AMENDED). SHEET 1. Add the following General Note MAINTENANCE AND OPERATION OF THE PRIVATE SANITARY SEWER TO ITS POINT OF CONNECTION TO THE PUBLIC SEWER IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE PROPERTY OWNER. SHEET 2. Show cleanouts at each turn. SHEET 2. Show the rim and invert elevation for all cleanouts. SHEET 2. Show the length, size and slope of the proposed private sewers. SHEET 2. Show the size and Pima County plan number for the existing public sewer(s) shown on this sheet. We will require a revised set of drawings and a response letter addressing each comment. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. The next submittal of this project will be the 2nd submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $100.00 made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. For any questions regarding the fee schedule, please go to http://www.pimaxpress.com/SubDivision/Documents/Fees.PDF where you may find the appropriate wastewater review fees at the bottom of page 1. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. If you have any questions regarding the above mentioned comments, please contact me. Sincerely, Dickie Fernández, E.I.T. Telephone: (520) 740-6947 Copy: Project |
| 06/26/2006 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Approv-Cond | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: D06-0025 TUCSON COMMUNITY CHURCH/DEVELOPMNET PLAN DATE: June 26, 2006 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and we hereby approve this project. APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITION: ADD BK 36, PG 56 TO MIDVALE PARK COMMERCE CENTER (TITLE BLOCK) ON APPROVED MYLAR. NOTE: 1: Submit a 24 x 36 Reverse Reading Double Matte Photo Mylar of approved Development Plan to City Planning. Signed and dated Mylar will be forwarded to Pima County Addressing prior to assignment of addresses. 2: All addresses will need to be displayed per Pima County Address Standards at the time of final inspection. jg |
| 06/30/2006 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Approved | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT D06-0025 Tucson Community Church () Tentative Plat (XXXX) Development Plan (XXXX) Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other CROSS REFERENCE: NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Santa Cruz GATEWAY ROUTE: COMMENTS DUE BY: 7/10/06 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment (XXXX) Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies () See Additional Comments Attached () No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: () Resubmittal Required: () Tentative Plat () Development Plan () Landscape Plan () Other – REVIEWER: D. Estolano 791-4505 DATE: 06/27/06 |
| 07/10/2006 | FRODRIG2 | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Approved | No comment |
| 07/10/2006 | JOSE ORTIZ | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Denied | July 10, 2006 ACTIVITY NUMBER: D06-0025 PROJECT NAME: Tucson Comm. Church PROJECT ADDRESS: 6721 S Renaissance Dr PROJECT REVIEWER: Jose E. Ortiz PE, Traffic Engineer Resubmittal Required: Traffic Engineering does not recommend approval of the Development Plan; therefore a revised Development Plan is required for resubmittal. The following items must be revised or added to the plan. 1. Include a response letter with the next submittal that states how all comments have been addressed. 2. Provide dimensions to all curb returns. Minimum curb return radius is 18 feet(DS 3-01.0 figure 6) 3. Confirm the Right of Way width at the north portion of the project along Renaissance Drive. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-4259 x305 or Jose.Ortiz@tucsonaz.gov |
| 07/12/2006 | JASON GREEN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: July 12, 2006 SUBJECT: Southwest Tucson Community Church- Development Plan Review TO: Jay Hanson LOCATION: 6721 S Renaissance Dr., T15S R13E Sec15, Ward 1 REVIEWERS: Jason Green, CFM ACTIVITY: D06-0025 SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Development Services Department has received and reviewed the submitted development plan, landscape plan and drainage report. The drainage report was reviewed for development plan purpose only. The development plan is not approved at this time. Please address the following comments: DRAINAGE REPORT: 1) DS Sec.10-02.2.3.1.3: Revise the drainage report to show the same watershed area for concentration points 1E (existing) and 1D (developed). Or explain the difference in watershed area used for the developed conditions. If concentration point 1D is 1.6 acres revise all of the calculations for hydrology and hydraulics and provide the correct storage volume required for the proposed basin. Revise the development plan to reflect any changes made in the drainage report. 2) DS Sec. 3-01.4.4.F: Provide a revised drainage report showing scupper calculations that demonstrate that the 10-year flood flow from the roof drainage is contained under the sidewalk. Provide details in plan view for the scupper dimensions. DEVELOPMENT PLAN COMMENTS: 3) DSSec.2-05.2.1.D: Revise the project location map on Sheet 1 of 3 to show the subject property approximately centered within the one square mile area. Identify conditions within the square mile area, such as major watercourses. 4) DS Sec.2-05.2.1.K: The correct development plan number (D06-0025) may be added to the lower right hand corner of the plans and provide the applicable annexation number where indicated by the "CoX-XX-XX-". 5) DS Sec.2-05.2.2.B.8: Revise Keynote #1 to include the Book and Page of Midvale Park Commerce Center 6) Ds Sec.2-05.2.2.C: Revise the development plan to show the existing right of way for Renaissance Drive. Provide the right-of-way width, recordation data and width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks. Indicate if the existing street is public or private. 7) DS Sec.3-01.3.2.C: Depict and label 18-feet radii concrete curbs per City of Tucson/Pima County Standard Detail 213 (PC/COT SD 213) at all of the driveway entrances along Renaissance Drive. The curbs should be constructed at the edge of pavement, which must also be depicted on the development plan. 8) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.H.1: Label 100-year water surface elevation and limits of ponding for the proposed detention basin in plan view to match the requirements of the drainage report. 9) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.H.3: Provide a detail for the location and type of drainage structure, label and dimension scuppers, that are used for collecting onsite roof drainage at all pedestrian sidewalk. Any scupper proposed under the sidewalk will be designed and constructed to convey the 10-year flood flow. Provide a revised drainage report showing scupper calculations that demonstrate that the 10-year flood flow is contained under the sidewalk. 10) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.T: Provide dimensions for refuse container as called out in Keynote #11, Architectural Plans were not submitted with the Engineering review package. Show and label gates or doors for trash enclosures. The enclosure must have a minimum inside clear dimension of 10 feet by 10 feet between steel pipes that are required between the container and the enclosure's rear and sidewall. Refer to DS Sec.6-01.4.2 for specifications and requirements on access, placement of containers, bin enclosure and construction. 11) DS Sec.3-01.3.3.B.5: Provide a minimum 5-foot wide pedestrian circulation around the entire proposed structure, sidewalks must be physically separated from any vehicular travel lane (proposed location of loading zone) by means of curbing, grade separation, railing, or barriers. Refer to DS Sec.3-01.3.3 for pedestrian circulation paths. 12) DS 10-02.0, Section 14.3.2: Provide a note on the development plan stating that, (a) the owner or owners shall be solely responsible for operation, maintenance, and liability for drainage structures and detention basins; (b) that the owner or owners shall have an Arizona Registered Professional Civil Engineer prepare a certified inspection report for the drainage and detention/retention facilities at lease once each year, and that these regular inspection reports will be on file with the owner for review by City staff, upon written request; (c) that City staff may periodically inspect the drainage and retention/detention facilities to verify that scheduled and unscheduled maintenance activities are being performed adequately; and (d) that the owner or owners agree to reimburse the City for any and all costs associated with the maintaining of the drainage and detention/retention facilities, should the City find the owner or owners deficient in their obligation to adequately operate and maintain their facilities." 13) DS Sec.11-01.2.1: Provide estimated cut and fill quantities on the development plan for grading plan purposes. GRADING PLAN: 14) DS Sec.11-01.2.1: A grading permit may be required for this project depending on the cut and fill quantities provided at resubmittal. If fill quantities exceed 50 cubic yards submit a copy of the grading plan with text upon completion and submittals of a grading permit application. A grading permit may not be issued prior to development plan approval. Subsequent comments may be necessary, depending upon the nature and extent of revisions that occur to the plans 15) Please ensure the grading plan is consistent with the development plan and drainage report. Grading standards may be accessed at: http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/DevStandsTOC.pdf 16) Provide a General Note to reference conformance with City of Tucson Development Standard 11-01.0 (excavation and grading requirements). 17) Arizona Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (AZPDES) requirements are applicable to this project. Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans (SWPPP) and text addressing stormwater controls for all areas affected by construction activities related to this development will be required with a grading plan submittal. For further information, visit www.adeq.state.az.us/environ/water/permits/stormwater.html. GEOTECHNICAL REPORT: 18) DS Sec.10-01.III.3.5.1.3.a, 10-02.14.2.6: A geotechnical evaluation needs to be submitted for review, addressing the following: a) Soils report should provide conformance with DS section 10-02.14.2.6 regarding 30-foot boring for basin, and provide discussion of potential for hydro-collapsible soils and any recommendation for setbacks from building to basin. b) The soils report shall provide identification / assessment of any potentially hazardous geotechnical areas, and state any geotechnical recommendations and whether there are special provisions for the soil preparation for this development. c) Provide slope stability recommendations for any proposed constructed slopes. d) Provide pavement structure design recommendations. GENERAL COMMENTS: Please provide a revised development plan, a revised drainage report, and a geotechnical report that address the comments provided above. Include a comprehensive response letter addressing in detail responses to all of the above comments. Further comments may be generated upon resubmittal of the development plan, drainage report, and geotechnical report reviews. Please enclose "redlines" with the resubmittal package for reference. For any questions or to schedule a meeting, call me at 791-5550, extension 1189. Jason Green, CFM Senior Engineer Associate Engineering Division Development Services |
| 07/12/2006 | FRODRIG2 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Approved | Estimated daily trips - 57 |
| 07/21/2006 | PGEHLEN1 | TUCSON WATER NEW AREA DEVELOPMENT | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 08/02/2006 | ROBERT YOUNG | PIMA COUNTY | PIMA CTY - DEV REVIEW | Passed | |
| 08/03/2006 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Denied | DATE: August 03, 2006 TO: Ferne Rodriguez, Development Services FROM: Glenn Hicks Parks and Recreation 791-4873 ext. 215 Glenn.Hicks@tucsonaz.gov CC: SUBJECT: D06-0025 Tucson Community Church: Development Plan(6/09/06) Denied. Please show a “view” wall along the east side of the project that faces the Santa Cruz River. The Santa Cruz River area will be developed into a river park in the future. Walls along river park trail corridors should incorporate one of the following decorative materials: tile, stone, brick, textured brick/block, a coarse-textured material such as stucco or plaster, wrought iron, or a combination of the above materials to create a see-thru “view wall”. |
| 08/10/2006 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | 4350 E. Irvington Road, Tucson, AZ 85714 Post Office Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702 WR# 164386 June 26, 2006 Tetra Tech, Inc. Attn: Mr. Ray Brown 33 N. Stone Ave., Suite 1500 Tucson, AZ 85701-1413 Dear Mr. Brown: SUBJECT: TUCSON COMMUNITY CHURCH D06-0025 Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the development plan submitted June 9, 2006. It appears that there are no existing facilities within the boundaries of this proposed development. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. In order to apply for electric service, call the New Construction Department at (520) 918-8300. Submit a final set of plans including approved site, offsite and electrical load plans. Include a CD with the AutoCAD version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Your final plans should be sent to: Tucson Electric Power Company Attn: Ms. Mary Boice New Business Project Manager P. O. Box 711 (DB-101) Tucson, AZ 85702 520-917-8732 Please call the area Designer Mike Kaiser at (520) 918-8244, should you have any questions. Sincerely, Kathy Clark Scheduling Coordinator Design/Build kc Enclosures cc: P. Gehlen, City of Tucson M. Kaiser, Tucson Electric Power Co. |
| 08/15/2006 | KAROL ARAGONEZ | ZONING | REVIEW | Passed | PROJECT: D06-0025 Tucson Community Church TRANSMITTAL DATE: June 9, 2006 DUE DATE: July 10, 2006 COMMENTS: This site does not require a development as specified in Annexation Zoning Case No. C9-83-34, Zoning Ordinance 5843. A site plan will be required. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Karol Aragonez, (520) 791-5550. KAA C:\planning\cdrc\developmentplan\D06-0025dp.doc |
| 08/17/2006 | MKALTHO1 | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Completed |